She 100% needs to be retried. I watched the interrogation video. She fully admitted to pushing her baby's face into the mattress and holding it there. Because she wanted her to stop crying. She was acquitted on a technicality. She deserves to rot in a cell for the rest of her days. The fact she's got the audacity to show her face and do an interview like this- acting like she's innocent- is just flat out repulsive. I hope that retrial comes swiftly and that she's put away for a long, long time.
It is sad and she has no remorse… i could not imagine hurting anyone and after watching the video of the interrogation I feel she’s 100% guilty… that poor baby… she is a cold hearted snake 🐍!
@@lyndieskurry1969 greedy lady. coulve given baby to a safe place location. take time for yourself and when the baby grows up to be an adult your daughter would of still been here... being a mom is not for everyone it should not be a stigma for post partum deppression..
She says I guess maybe I could have the medical findings still said sids even after an autopsy. So autopsy and hospital findings were both the same most likely detectives lied about the finger marks on babys neck and thats why the jury didn't find her guilty for 1st murder because the findings were not there
@cruisannarobertson7196 groomed and lied to? You can find the full interrogation video on here. From start to finish. She starts off laughing and giggling and asking about her baby's life insurance money so she can put it towards the house she was in the process of buying.. She goes on to admit to killing her baby. The autopsy report found the baby died of asphyxiation. The only one saying that the asphyxiation could be related to SIDS is her defense attorney. Because that's literally what he's paid to do. She was acquitted on a technicality. The charging papers did not specify an act of negligence on the part of the mother. “The specification alleges that Appellant murdered (Scarlett Flores-Guerra) ‘by asphyxia’ without further identifying an act or omission.” That's what her appeal was granted for. She was only released because the paperwork wasn't specific enough. You can look any of this up for yourself. It's public information.
Shouldnt be out. She admitted yo swaddling a 5 month old and too tight putting her face down. Spoke about cashing in the babys life insurance to pay for her house. Theres no justice. You dont get to escape the truth when you cross over
@@soupnfresh They are getting the insurance information from her interrogation. She talks about wondering when they would collect the insurance money because they were moving into a new house and wanted to use part of it for that. Around 4:30 in this video. ruclips.net/video/vZFjsSQs-cI/видео.html
@@soupnfreshBecause she never says anything about it people are just adding what they want. And only picking the words they want like when she says i thought it was because I swaddled her too tight.
One of the very first things she asked in the interrogation was about about the death benefits not being processed. She stated they were building a new home and were hoping to pay for it with the money as well as paying down their debt. She also definitely said that she swaddled the baby tightly and that she pushed her babies face into the mattress. They also brought up that in one of their conversations that she said the baby looked like her face had been smashed into the mattress. Not sure how this got over turned but I’m very curious!
@@cruisannarobertson7196it's literally in the 1st minute of her interrogation, she asks why it wasn't released yet, and goes in what the plans were with it.
Yes, they did. That is why the jury found her guilty of 2nd degree murder and also because of her internet searches of "what if I want to harm my baby." She also admitted to shoving the babies face into the bed. She was let out after serving only 2 years over a technicality in the paperwork, not because they acquitted her. That is why they can re-try her if they choose to.
@@John-tp5gc I think it’s automatic for US military family members to be covered with life insurance. (?) that’s what someone on one of these threads said.
@@John-tp5gc I can the military saying if your child dies, all services will be covered.. something like that.. But the parent should never be allowed to profit off a death. They wouldn’t want to.. unless..
@@John-tp5gc It's actually a really good idea - can you imagine losing a child and then on top of that having to worry about the expenses of the ambulance that couldn't save them and the funeral?! I couldn't. I was sick about getting policies on my children but did because the thought of having to focus on anything but grieving in that awful circumstance was something I just wouldn't want to worry about. That said, I can't imagine it even TOUCHING my priority list, especially when you don't even know for sure what happened to your baby and then to say you're going to use it to pay off house expenses?! Are you kidding me?! That's not what it's for.... it's gross.
@@soupnfresh the problem is, she never said that in her interrogation, she admitted to shoving the babies face into the bed when she put her to bed (there were marks on her neck and the back of her head) and had made internet searches for "what if I want to harm my baby," and "what if I hate being a mom." She was found guilty of 2nd degree murder, but was let out after serving 2 years on a technicality over paperwork, not because they acquitted her of the charges, thus why she can be re-tried if they choose to. It came out in court that the dad was out with friends when the baby died and that is why he was never a suspect.
The problem is you think that video was the only interrogation. They had spoken to her for several days by that point. That video is from months after the baby died.
@@soupnfreshshe's the one who put the baby in the crib, she's the one who swaddled her, and she's the one who shoved the baby's face into the mattress, the husband most likely assumed the baby was sleeping, he did nothing, hence why he wasn't charged. She's the one who looked up disgusting searches in the internet, she's the one who wanted an abortion, she's the one who wanted the life insurance payout, she's the one who had post.partum depression and should have gotten some help.
Oh my, I am so glad that she is all happy again and life is so colorful. Too bad Scarlet is not alive to celebrate and share your wonderful life. Bullshit!!!!!!! You murdered your baby and you are no hero or unique.
She murdered her baby. She is so good at covering her evil deed with excuses and LIES, but she will have to live with it. She keeps talking about "suffering" and all the horrible experiences in her life. How much did that sweet baby girl suffer when her mother held her hand on the back of her head and pressed it into the bed to suffocate her????????
Exactly!! She ADMITTED she shoved the baby's head into the bed and there were marks on the baby's neck and the back of its head. The coroner said it was NOT SIDS, it was a homicide by suffocation. Her conviction was overturned on a paperwork technicality. They can choose to re-try her, sadly, they probably won't and there will never be justice for the poor baby murdered at the hands of its own mother. When they interrogated her, she was much more concerned with when she would get her insurance pay out, because she wanted to use it to help build their new house.
Calling BS on her innocence story. The final question about why she's still on active duty really sums up how full of BS she is "I wasn't given a choice" lol
This is so gross. How does a mother murder their BABY and then just get to live their best life? What the actual fuck. And she’s giving this interview with a smile? 🤢
Absolutely disgusting! The world is colorful now? What a POS... You don't admit to harming YOUR INFANT CHILD & get to PRETEND you weren't the reason! Shame on this system. Shame her ridiculous story.
@@John-tp5gc am sure many moms have googled these and similar questions and ended up raising wonderful kids into adulthood. motherhood is extremely hard.
@@fernfunk wanting to hurt your kid is absolutely not normal. You can feel a lot of things. Resentment, regret over being a parent, irritation at your kids, disillusioned spent tired pissed and disappointed. That's all normal, but wanting to hurt your kid is despicable and psychopathic
@@jamessteele5918 yes that probably is true! i felt all those things but never ever thought about harming either of my kids. i just thought maybe some mothers do think it without intending to ever act on it.
Here we have what a narcissist looks like. All she wanted was the insurance money and never once asked about the baby or cared about the baby. Now it is poor me poor me poor me. What about that maybe that you smothered that you never wanted. That you wanted to plan b and to abort. Good thing her husband left her. Good thing she wasn't pregnant.
@@jessjensen1294I was so nervous when my sons was a baby, now 7. My family use to make fun of the fact my son was deprived of a blanket that’s why he’s obsessed with soft blankets now. He has atleast 5 soft blankets in his bed and many others that he loves. I don’t actually think he was deprived of a blanket , it was safety and I gave him his blanket and monkey when I felt comfortable and he loved them from 6-9 months ish to 4/5 years old. monkey and Blankey came everywhere and it was a pain in butt to remember everytime we left house but it Was a sad day when he stopped carrying monkey and blanket everywhere and didn’t need them to sleep ❤❤
Infants under 1 shouldn't have a blanket AT ALL, they can use swaddling devices (they actually make swaddlers that velcro) as long as the infant can't roll yet.
your whole life turned upside down??? At least you still have a life........what about the life that baby could have had in this world? You remember...first thing you asked detective about when you went for integration? You were asking about insurance money from baby's death. Sick!
When talking about the interrogation she says “ you can see my reaction. “ and shows her neck which has been red the whole time. lol this girl is such a clown. Why is this murderer released ???
smth about the charge of causing asphyxiation not being specific enough, a technicality as I understand it. I am also surprised at what she is saying here as it seemed like the marks on the baby and what she said in the interrogation implies she pressed the baby’s face into the mattress out of frustration to stop her crying.
@@soupnfresh you need to do better research. The dad was never a suspect; he was out with friends when the baby died, and she admitted to shoving the babies face into the bed (there were marks on the baby's neck and the back of its head). Her conviction was overturned on a paperwork technicality, not because they had any evidence to acquit her and that is why they can choose to retry her.
It was overturned after she served 2 years on a paperwork technicality not because they had any new evidence to acquit her. That is why they can choose to retry her. She admitted to shoving the baby's head into the bed and had performed internet searches of, "what if I want to harm my baby." The coroner said it was not SIDS, but it was a homicide, and the baby died by being smothered. She is lying as she did in court.
She is very lucky. I don't want to place judgement, only on a police interrogation. It could have been SIDS. But also, it could have been, Kate being totally lost for a few minutes, not getting sweet little Scarlett, quiet. It is something, Kate has to live with rest of her life, but I can understand not wanting to face that. I wish Kate the best. Deepdown, she knows, if she smothered little Scarlett.
You need to get out they are not being helpful your 4 years are up I don't know why they're trying to keep you but I think you should talk to your lawyer because I think they're only holding you so they can recharge you
She did more talking one minute than in the entire law&crime network on RUclips entire 1hr 30mins. She didn't even know what smothered meant!!! 11 minutes!!!
God will judge. She will never know her daughter, she will never have beautiful memories, she will never have a mother daughter relationship, she will never see her daughetr grow into a beautiful woman. Unless she is a psycopath, she will be traumatised for the rest of her life over this. You never get over the loss of a child. I hope she has the Lord in her life and I hope God guides ger in the rigght way.
As an investigator, I absolutely knew during her interrogation, she was absolutely not guilty or at fault. I had no doubt and I wanted so badly to reach out and get in tge case, as a defense investigator. Retrospectively, I wish I woukd have. Kare, Im so sorry that this all happened to you and especially Scarlet. You were a good mom.
Ugh I hope you’re unemployed and stay that way. You don’t need a degree to see this woman was guilty as sin. She admitted guilt. With zero fear or intimidation. Tf are you talking about?
I suppose the world is made up of a**-holes, like yourself. I'd explain how I arrived at my conclusion, but it is obvious to me (and likewise any whose read your response), that you are illiterate. If I had to guess, you've got tires piled up in front of your rented trailer, right? You've got at least two kids (different baby daddy's) and cannot wait until your next SNAP/EBT deposit. How am I doing? (No degree needed). As I stated above, I won't bother explaning it, you'll never be able to grasp the higher thinking. I'm not saying its your fault. Sone of us just have dirtleg-DNA. Now run along and go watch your Jerry Springer re-runs. @itstatystoopid1538
Just being honest and I know ppl wont agree byt when watching the interrogation she never said she smotherd her she seemed genuinely upset thinking she accidentally killed her child and the cops were trying to talk her into what they thought happened so idk just not convinced she intentionally killed her baby
There were red marks on the back of the baby's neck where she pressed her head into the mattress. It is hard to get around that fact. Plus, the first thing she asked about was the insurance money to build a new house with and there were those disturbing google searches. Her now trying to blame her husband when he wasn't even there is also telling.
I never understood how they could lie in that interview/interrogation and tell her she wouldn’t go to jail. And she never admitted to killing her baby…she just felt that she maybe swaddled her daughter too tight.
So you obviously didnt watch it then because she clearly says that she flipped her daughter over and pushed her head down into the matress she said she coukdnt remember how long she had pushed her head down for !!! She said she was angry because the baby was crying.. her internet search history was i hate being a mother and that she wants to hurt her baby. She admitted pushing her babies head into the matress they even found blood on the pacifier the postmortum said there were injries on the back of her neck and back of her head that were consistant with a human hand pushing down hard. !!!! Shes murdered that poor baby!! She is a monster!!!
You can hear the depression in her voice she is depressed because she killed her child and got away with it. An innocent person would not be depressed after being released from prison. Her hell is just beginning.
Prayers for this Mom..I truly don’t believe she killed her baby girl..the base investigators told lies about what “evidence” they had and truly played mind games with her during their questioning…I’m sure during all that questioning she was in a total state of shock..and who would be normal with that kind of loss?!..prayers for her healing!❤
There were marks on the back of the baby's head and neck and the coroner said it was NOT SIDS, it was a homicide by suffocation. She had done internet searches on, "what if I want to harm my baby," and admitted to shoving its face into the bed. The dad was out with friends when the baby died and was never a suspect and she never said anything about him in her interrogations, but here she is trying to blame him in this interview. That is telling. Also, in her interrogation, the first thing she asked was when she would get the insurance pay out because they were building a new house and she wanted to use some of the money for that. She is NOT the innocent caring mother she is now trying to portray herself to be. she was found guilty of 2nd Degree Murder but was let out after 2 years over a paperwork technicality, not because they had any new evidence to acquit her. That is why they can choose to retry her, but sadly they probably won't.
Are u kidding me!!!!????? She had been searching i want to hurt my baby and i haye being a mum. The baby had injuries on the back of her neck and back of her head consistant with a hand pushing down on her!!! The mum even said she pushed the babies head into the matress!!! How dsre you shr killed that child all because the baby was crying she is a monster!!!
@@joanne12348 r u kidding me???…How dare YOU to tell me what my opinion should be! I’ve watched the interviews…all of them..My OPINION is that she didn’t kill her baby girl. The things she said was her repeating what the investigators said to her!..the INVESTIGATORS said the baby had HAND marks on the back of her neck…NOT the coroners report! I can’t even fathom having rational thoughts if my infant baby had just died!…That is my opinion…respectfully I disagree with you!
Why are they dismissing the hand print on the back of SCARLETTS head???? Does anyone care about this baby. SHE never bought up her husband drinking tequila on the couch. During the interrogation, she was worried about being away from him while going into the mental institution, so if you're worried about your husband being away from you but he could possibly be the killer of your daughter because he was drinking tequila on the couch. It's unacceptable.
Wrongfully convictions?? Im disgusted that because she had post partum she gets off. She knew exactly what she was doing, she shoild have just laid the baby in the crib, not swaddled amd left the room to calm down. She should be in jail for murder
Why wasn't the husband charged since he was with her daughter drinking tequila when the baby died... It was probably negligent to put the baby on her stomach which resulted in death but the husband could have been fed up with the baby crying and smothered her. Hmm
what a disgrace...no justice for the innocent baby...who suffered a terrible death at this narcissist's hands. You are an adult...you knew enough to get mental help and not leave yourself alone with the baby. You knew the baby was at risk being with you. You wanted to abort this baby.....so you knew you were not the motherly type. You will be re-tried and justice will be done.
I don't understand why you swaddled her, put a pacifier in her mouth and then place her on her stomach? Didn't they teach you safe sleeping habits? I don't believe you killed but all of those things don't make any sense.
Wtf was the husband even questioned like she was? Or maybe he was because he was drinking and wouldn’t remember what he did when being alone with the baby? She didn’t kill her baby , I don’t have that feeling after watching all the interviews of her. Very sad.
Its astonishing after hearing the interrogation that people have no common sense to hear that these people were saying and doing ANYTHING to make her feel safe enough to confess to murdering her child after she continuously kept telling them in many ways she could NOT remeber doing what she was accused of and she couldnt understand HOW her death happened, to the point of exhaustion and desperation to get passed the torture. If these people who beleive she is guilty are chisen to be jurors then we need to demand a common sense test be given to every juror in the world. Yes she asked twoo ths later about her childs benefits like anyone going through emotional and financial situation. My daughter has had post partum depression after 8 children and never murder any of them. Doesnt mean she was guilty of murder. She was convinced and promised anything if she went along with the story they kept beating into her head. Reminds me of a child when accused of doing something and the child in weak state of mind decides to confess indeed they are guilty of eatinf the cupcakes yet the family pet is the one who ate them. Only to have punished the child for it. The point is knowingly willingly and she kept saying she didnt know and giving honest explanations as to what xould of happened. Smh!
Kate, why the heck didn't you ask for an attorney? My heart breaks for you listening to that video. I kept thinking if she didn't do this they are psychologically messing with her beyond what a grieving mother can handle.
Give it up! She knew what she was doing, she was frustrated and tired and instead of leaving the baby and calming herself down, she smothered her, pushing her into the mattress, she had internet searches about killing her baby, and why do I not want to be a mother, post partum mothers who murder should still be charged and put into prison. This I'd disgusting that she's out!!! That poor baby
I survived 911...building ONE: I suffer terribly from ptsd......but I don't think of hurting people....I only think of helping or saving people. Stop blaming ptsd. And you didn't lose your child, you took her life. You could have saved her by calling your husband to come home ASAP! No...she did not die from SID....she had the markings of your hands on her neck and head. ER said that becuase they didn't have enough info. Specialists examining the body found she died from blunt force of smothering.
What a lot of BS. She can quit her job ? I fo not bekieve her. What about the hand print? I fo not now if the ex husband is involved. But first she says it is SIS and than she says her rx was involved. That does not fit right by me.
Are u for real she pushed her babies head into the matress they found blood on her pacifier ! She killed her baby because she was crying she is an absolute monster!!!
She 100% needs to be retried. I watched the interrogation video. She fully admitted to pushing her baby's face into the mattress and holding it there. Because she wanted her to stop crying. She was acquitted on a technicality. She deserves to rot in a cell for the rest of her days. The fact she's got the audacity to show her face and do an interview like this- acting like she's innocent- is just flat out repulsive. I hope that retrial comes swiftly and that she's put away for a long, long time.
It is sad and she has no remorse… i could not imagine hurting anyone and after watching the video of the interrogation I feel she’s 100% guilty… that poor baby… she is a cold hearted snake 🐍!
@@lyndieskurry1969 greedy lady. coulve given baby to a safe place location. take time for yourself and when the baby grows up to be an adult your daughter would of still been here... being a mom is not for everyone it should not be a stigma for post partum deppression..
She says I guess maybe I could have the medical findings still said sids even after an autopsy. So autopsy and hospital findings were both the same most likely detectives lied about the finger marks on babys neck and thats why the jury didn't find her guilty for 1st murder because the findings were not there
@@lissetcarreno1167Also remember she was groomed and lied to before they recorded the part they wanted for the court.
@cruisannarobertson7196 groomed and lied to? You can find the full interrogation video on here. From start to finish. She starts off laughing and giggling and asking about her baby's life insurance money so she can put it towards the house she was in the process of buying.. She goes on to admit to killing her baby.
The autopsy report found the baby died of asphyxiation. The only one saying that the asphyxiation could be related to SIDS is her defense attorney. Because that's literally what he's paid to do.
She was acquitted on a technicality. The charging papers did not specify an act of negligence on the part of the mother. “The specification alleges that Appellant murdered (Scarlett Flores-Guerra) ‘by asphyxia’ without further identifying an act or omission.” That's what her appeal was granted for. She was only released because the paperwork wasn't specific enough.
You can look any of this up for yourself. It's public information.
Shouldnt be out. She admitted yo swaddling a 5 month old and too tight putting her face down. Spoke about cashing in the babys life insurance to pay for her house.
Theres no justice. You dont get to escape the truth when you cross over
Where is everyone getting the life insurance info. Can't find that anywhere.
@@soupnfresh They are getting the insurance information from her interrogation. She talks about wondering when they would collect the insurance money because they were moving into a new house and wanted to use part of it for that. Around 4:30 in this video. ruclips.net/video/vZFjsSQs-cI/видео.html
@@soupnfreshBecause she never says anything about it people are just adding what they want. And only picking the words they want like when she says i thought it was because I swaddled her too tight.
One of the very first things she asked in the interrogation was about about the death benefits not being processed. She stated they were building a new home and were hoping to pay for it with the money as well as paying down their debt. She also definitely said that she swaddled the baby tightly and that she pushed her babies face into the mattress. They also brought up that in one of their conversations that she said the baby looked like her face had been smashed into the mattress. Not sure how this got over turned but I’m very curious!
@@cruisannarobertson7196it's literally in the 1st minute of her interrogation, she asks why it wasn't released yet, and goes in what the plans were with it.
HOLD ON!!! Didnt they find hand prints on the back of the babys head where she had been smothered?
Wtf. The baby went to the ER. Hand prints from Mom and not the doctors and nurses. Not plausible.
Yes, they did. That is why the jury found her guilty of 2nd degree murder and also because of her internet searches of "what if I want to harm my baby." She also admitted to shoving the babies face into the bed. She was let out after serving only 2 years over a technicality in the paperwork, not because they acquitted her. That is why they can re-try her if they choose to.
That's not why.
All she was concerned about was cashing in that life insurance policy!
why does an infant have a life insurance policy?
@@John-tp5gc I think it’s automatic for US military family members to be covered with life insurance. (?) that’s what someone on one of these threads said.
@@John-tp5gc I can the military saying if your child dies, all services will be covered.. something like that..
But the parent should never be allowed to profit off a death. They wouldn’t want to.. unless..
I hope she didn't get anything
@@John-tp5gc It's actually a really good idea - can you imagine losing a child and then on top of that having to worry about the expenses of the ambulance that couldn't save them and the funeral?! I couldn't. I was sick about getting policies on my children but did because the thought of having to focus on anything but grieving in that awful circumstance was something I just wouldn't want to worry about. That said, I can't imagine it even TOUCHING my priority list, especially when you don't even know for sure what happened to your baby and then to say you're going to use it to pay off house expenses?! Are you kidding me?! That's not what it's for.... it's gross.
She is a murderer. She should be in prison continuing to serve her sentence. This is what privilege looks like!
So the husband who was drinking tequila and with the baby when she died couldn't possibly be the murderer. Okay
@@soupnfresh the problem is, she never said that in her interrogation, she admitted to shoving the babies face into the bed when she put her to bed (there were marks on her neck and the back of her head) and had made internet searches for "what if I want to harm my baby," and "what if I hate being a mom." She was found guilty of 2nd degree murder, but was let out after serving 2 years on a technicality over paperwork, not because they acquitted her of the charges, thus why she can be re-tried if they choose to. It came out in court that the dad was out with friends when the baby died and that is why he was never a suspect.
The problem is you think that video was the only interrogation. They had spoken to her for several days by that point. That video is from months after the baby died.
@@soupnfreshshe killed her child fuck offfffff
@@soupnfreshshe's the one who put the baby in the crib, she's the one who swaddled her, and she's the one who shoved the baby's face into the mattress, the husband most likely assumed the baby was sleeping, he did nothing, hence why he wasn't charged. She's the one who looked up disgusting searches in the internet, she's the one who wanted an abortion, she's the one who wanted the life insurance payout, she's the one who had post.partum depression and should have gotten some help.
Oh my, I am so glad that she is all happy again and life is so colorful. Too bad Scarlet is not alive to celebrate and share your wonderful life. Bullshit!!!!!!! You murdered your baby and you are no hero or unique.
Shes more traumatized by what happend to her rather than her babies death!!!
She murdered her baby. She is so good at covering her evil deed with excuses and LIES, but she will have to live with it. She keeps talking about "suffering" and all the horrible experiences in her life. How much did that sweet baby girl suffer when her mother held her hand on the back of her head and pressed it into the bed to suffocate her????????
That's what gets me she seems a lil self centered why did she search feelings of hurting a baby
Exactly!! She ADMITTED she shoved the baby's head into the bed and there were marks on the baby's neck and the back of its head. The coroner said it was NOT SIDS, it was a homicide by suffocation. Her conviction was overturned on a paperwork technicality. They can choose to re-try her, sadly, they probably won't and there will never be justice for the poor baby murdered at the hands of its own mother. When they interrogated her, she was much more concerned with when she would get her insurance pay out, because she wanted to use it to help build their new house.
This is repulsive. She is actually acting like she is a victim. And who caused the loss of your baby? God knows the truth!
I THOUGHT it got overturned because they found the baby passed from SIDS??
Calling BS on her innocence story. The final question about why she's still on active duty really sums up how full of BS she is "I wasn't given a choice" lol
This is so gross. How does a mother murder their BABY and then just get to live their best life? What the actual fuck. And she’s giving this interview with a smile? 🤢
Never, EVER trust military lawyers. Ever. Never.
How about dont murder your infant
She confessed pushing her baby’s face into the mattress so much there was a fuxin imprint on the baby’s face!!!! WTF IS GOING ON?
When “everyone turned on me’ is part of a conversation…Run.
Absolutely disgusting! The world is colorful now? What a POS... You don't admit to harming YOUR INFANT CHILD & get to PRETEND you weren't the reason! Shame on this system. Shame her ridiculous story.
Girl you can lie all you like with your words.
you KNOW what you did and for rest of your life it will haunt you
We all know what she did. It's so terribly obvious she's guilty. This interview reminds me of a movie star on the red carpet
The beetroot face and neck, during the obvious lying parts of this video is hugely telling !!
her Google searches are telling. They included, “What do I do if I feel like I want to hurt my baby?” and “What do I do if I hate being a mom?”
@@John-tp5gc am sure many moms have googled these and similar questions and ended up raising wonderful kids into adulthood. motherhood is extremely hard.
@@fernfunkShe sure didn't did she. Her baby is dead.
@@fernfunk wanting to hurt your kid is absolutely not normal. You can feel a lot of things. Resentment, regret over being a parent, irritation at your kids, disillusioned spent tired pissed and disappointed. That's all normal, but wanting to hurt your kid is despicable and psychopathic
@@jamessteele5918 yes that probably is true! i felt all those things but never ever thought about harming either of my kids. i just thought maybe some mothers do think it without intending to ever act on it.
Here we have what a narcissist looks like. All she wanted was the insurance money and never once asked about the baby or cared about the baby. Now it is poor me poor me poor me. What about that maybe that you smothered that you never wanted. That you wanted to plan b and to abort. Good thing her husband left her. Good thing she wasn't pregnant.
The interrogation happened months after the baby died.
You are not supposed to put the baby to sleep on their stomach and they need a loose blanket over them, not a tight swaddling blanket,
Ummm no… no loose blankets and yes they make swaddle onesies with straps.
That's what I was screaming 😢
@@jessjensen1294I was so nervous when my sons was a baby, now 7.
My family use to make fun of the fact my son was deprived of a blanket that’s why he’s obsessed with soft blankets now. He has atleast 5 soft blankets in his bed and many others that he loves. I don’t actually think he was deprived of a blanket , it was safety and I gave him his blanket and monkey when I felt comfortable and he loved them from 6-9 months ish to 4/5 years old. monkey and Blankey came everywhere and it was a pain in butt to remember everytime we left house but it Was a sad day when he stopped carrying monkey and blanket everywhere and didn’t need them to sleep ❤❤
Infants under 1 shouldn't have a blanket AT ALL, they can use swaddling devices (they actually make swaddlers that velcro) as long as the infant can't roll yet.
Yep, my baby would only sleep if tightly swaddled 👶🏼
your whole life turned upside down??? At least you still have a life........what about the life that baby could have had in this world? You remember...first thing you asked detective about when you went for integration? You were asking about insurance money from baby's death. Sick!
WHAT A JOKE 😡
How is she not in jail??
How is she saying this is a wrongful conviction when she admitted to killing her baby? She admitted to pushing her babies face into the mattress.
Hasn't mentioned her baby
She gross
Unbelievable
When talking about the interrogation she says “ you can see my reaction. “ and shows her neck which has been red the whole time. lol this girl is such a clown. Why is this murderer released ???
Totally wanted this pointed out, my reaction when she said that was like really?? She just didn't■bit sure enough ..
This can't be serious....
I just the law and crime interrogation.. Then I Googled her name Why was it overturned? He was frustrated, and he held her head down
smth about the charge of causing asphyxiation not being specific enough, a technicality as I understand it. I am also surprised at what she is saying here as it seemed like the marks on the baby and what she said in the interrogation implies she pressed the baby’s face into the mattress out of frustration to stop her crying.
The husband was with the baby drinking tequila when she died. Maybe the husband smothered her.
@@soupnfresh you need to do better research. The dad was never a suspect; he was out with friends when the baby died, and she admitted to shoving the babies face into the bed (there were marks on the baby's neck and the back of its head). Her conviction was overturned on a paperwork technicality, not because they had any evidence to acquit her and that is why they can choose to retry her.
It was overturned after she served 2 years on a paperwork technicality not because they had any new evidence to acquit her. That is why they can choose to retry her. She admitted to shoving the baby's head into the bed and had performed internet searches of, "what if I want to harm my baby." The coroner said it was not SIDS, but it was a homicide, and the baby died by being smothered. She is lying as she did in court.
You should do better research. The dad was their with her daughter.
She is very lucky. I don't want to place judgement, only on a police interrogation. It could have been SIDS. But also, it could have been, Kate being totally lost for a few minutes, not getting sweet little Scarlett, quiet. It is something, Kate has to live with rest of her life, but I can understand not wanting to face that. I wish Kate the best. Deepdown, she knows, if she smothered little Scarlett.
You need to get out they are not being helpful your 4 years are up I don't know why they're trying to keep you but I think you should talk to your lawyer because I think they're only holding you so they can recharge you
She shouldn't be out should of gotten life all she cared about was life insurance
She did more talking one minute than in the entire law&crime network on RUclips entire 1hr 30mins. She didn't even know what smothered meant!!! 11 minutes!!!
where does the 11 min come from? i missed that… time stamp?
Yeah but mentioned she wondered id she wrappes hwr too tight causing her to smother
God will judge. She will never know her daughter, she will never have beautiful memories, she will never have a mother daughter relationship, she will never see her daughetr grow into a beautiful woman. Unless she is a psycopath, she will be traumatised for the rest of her life over this. You never get over the loss of a child. I hope she has the Lord in her life and I hope God guides ger in the rigght way.
As an investigator, I absolutely knew during her interrogation, she was absolutely not guilty or at fault. I had no doubt and I wanted so badly to reach out and get in tge case, as a defense investigator. Retrospectively, I wish I woukd have. Kare, Im so sorry that this all happened to you and especially Scarlet. You were a good mom.
Ugh I hope you’re unemployed and stay that way. You don’t need a degree to see this woman was guilty as sin. She admitted guilt. With zero fear or intimidation. Tf are you talking about?
I suppose the world is made up of a**-holes, like yourself. I'd explain how I arrived at my conclusion, but it is obvious to me (and likewise any whose read your response), that you are illiterate. If I had to guess, you've got tires piled up in front of your rented trailer, right? You've got at least two kids (different baby daddy's) and cannot wait until your next SNAP/EBT deposit. How am I doing? (No degree needed). As I stated above, I won't bother explaning it, you'll never be able to grasp the higher thinking. I'm not saying its your fault. Sone of us just have dirtleg-DNA. Now run along and go watch your Jerry Springer re-runs. @itstatystoopid1538
Just being honest and I know ppl wont agree byt when watching the interrogation she never said she smotherd her she seemed genuinely upset thinking she accidentally killed her child and the cops were trying to talk her into what they thought happened so idk just not convinced she intentionally killed her baby
There were red marks on the back of the baby's neck where she pressed her head into the mattress. It is hard to get around that fact. Plus, the first thing she asked about was the insurance money to build a new house with and there were those disturbing google searches. Her now trying to blame her husband when he wasn't even there is also telling.
she said she pushed her baby into the mattress. there were marks on the baby.
Stop them before it gets bad!
I never understood how they could lie in that interview/interrogation and tell her she wouldn’t go to jail. And she never admitted to killing her baby…she just felt that she maybe swaddled her daughter too tight.
Why you ask for a lawyer and never speak to police. They are allowed to lie
So you obviously didnt watch it then because she clearly says that she flipped her daughter over and pushed her head down into the matress she said she coukdnt remember how long she had pushed her head down for !!! She said she was angry because the baby was crying.. her internet search history was i hate being a mother and that she wants to hurt her baby. She admitted pushing her babies head into the matress they even found blood on the pacifier the postmortum said there were injries on the back of her neck and back of her head that were consistant with a human hand pushing down hard. !!!! Shes murdered that poor baby!! She is a monster!!!
You can hear the depression in her voice she is depressed because she killed her child and got away with it. An innocent person would not be depressed after being released from prison. Her hell is just beginning.
Prayers for this Mom..I truly don’t believe she killed her baby girl..the base investigators told lies about what “evidence” they had and truly played mind games with her during their questioning…I’m sure during all that questioning she was in a total state of shock..and who would be normal with that kind of loss?!..prayers for her healing!❤
She did she admitted zhe wrapped her too tight and put her face down
I agree. I think they wore her down. She’s lost everything. My heart goes out to her. ❤
There were marks on the back of the baby's head and neck and the coroner said it was NOT SIDS, it was a homicide by suffocation. She had done internet searches on, "what if I want to harm my baby," and admitted to shoving its face into the bed. The dad was out with friends when the baby died and was never a suspect and she never said anything about him in her interrogations, but here she is trying to blame him in this interview. That is telling. Also, in her interrogation, the first thing she asked was when she would get the insurance pay out because they were building a new house and she wanted to use some of the money for that. She is NOT the innocent caring mother she is now trying to portray herself to be. she was found guilty of 2nd Degree Murder but was let out after 2 years over a paperwork technicality, not because they had any new evidence to acquit her. That is why they can choose to retry her, but sadly they probably won't.
Are u kidding me!!!!????? She had been searching i want to hurt my baby and i haye being a mum. The baby had injuries on the back of her neck and back of her head consistant with a hand pushing down on her!!! The mum even said she pushed the babies head into the matress!!! How dsre you shr killed that child all because the baby was crying she is a monster!!!
@@joanne12348 r u kidding me???…How dare YOU to tell me what my opinion should be! I’ve watched the interviews…all of them..My OPINION is that she didn’t kill her baby girl. The things she said was her repeating what the investigators said to her!..the INVESTIGATORS said the baby had HAND marks on the back of her neck…NOT the coroners report! I can’t even fathom having rational thoughts if my infant baby had just died!…That is my opinion…respectfully I disagree with you!
Her first question was the baby life insurance. That’s motive!
Why are they dismissing the hand print on the back of SCARLETTS head???? Does anyone care about this baby. SHE never bought up her husband drinking tequila on the couch. During the interrogation, she was worried about being away from him while going into the mental institution, so if you're worried about your husband being away from you but he could possibly be the killer of your daughter because he was drinking tequila on the couch. It's unacceptable.
Wrongfully convictions?? Im disgusted that because she had post partum she gets off. She knew exactly what she was doing, she shoild have just laid the baby in the crib, not swaddled amd left the room to calm down. She should be in jail for murder
2:07 till she mentions her daughter at all
Why wasn't the husband charged since he was with her daughter drinking tequila when the baby died... It was probably negligent to put the baby on her stomach which resulted in death but the husband could have been fed up with the baby crying and smothered her. Hmm
Why are you everywhere blaming the husband lol it was her
Why are you blaming the mother when the mother left the baby alive with the father.
May I ask where you heard or read about the husband being with the baby and drinking tequila? I am genuinely interested.
@@huntasoup They said in this full length interview.
what a disgrace...no justice for the innocent baby...who suffered a terrible death at this narcissist's hands. You are an adult...you knew enough to get mental help and not leave yourself alone with the baby. You knew the baby was at risk being with you. You wanted to abort this baby.....so you knew you were not the motherly type. You will be re-tried and justice will be done.
After what she googled how th is she free wth 😮😮😮
All the people in the comments treating her like a white savior. Please I implore you, do not ever serve in a jury.
I don't understand why you swaddled her, put a pacifier in her mouth and then place her on her stomach? Didn't they teach you safe sleeping habits? I don't believe you killed but all of those things don't make any sense.
Wtf was the husband even questioned like she was? Or maybe he was because he was drinking and wouldn’t remember what he did when being alone with the baby?
She didn’t kill her baby , I don’t have that feeling after watching all the interviews of her. Very sad.
sorry for your loss
Wow
Ms. Richard...PLEASE read "Crooked" by Forrest Maready. My heart goes out to you.
So wrong what has happened to our military.
so much trauma. I pray for your repeated healing,
She's a murderer she should of gotten life all she cared about was life insurance policy
Our justice system sucks. Kharma will get her ass
Its astonishing after hearing the interrogation that people have no common sense to hear that these people were saying and doing ANYTHING to make her feel safe enough to confess to murdering her child after she continuously kept telling them in many ways she could NOT remeber doing what she was accused of and she couldnt understand HOW her death happened, to the point of exhaustion and desperation to get passed the torture. If these people who beleive she is guilty are chisen to be jurors then we need to demand a common sense test be given to every juror in the world. Yes she asked twoo ths later about her childs benefits like anyone going through emotional and financial situation. My daughter has had post partum depression after 8 children and never murder any of them. Doesnt mean she was guilty of murder. She was convinced and promised anything if she went along with the story they kept beating into her head. Reminds me of a child when accused of doing something and the child in weak state of mind decides to confess indeed they are guilty of eatinf the cupcakes yet the family pet is the one who ate them. Only to have punished the child for it. The point is knowingly willingly and she kept saying she didnt know and giving honest explanations as to what xould of happened. Smh!
Kate, why the heck didn't you ask for an attorney? My heart breaks for you listening to that video. I kept thinking if she didn't do this they are psychologically messing with her beyond what a grieving mother can handle.
Give it up! She knew what she was doing, she was frustrated and tired and instead of leaving the baby and calming herself down, she smothered her, pushing her into the mattress, she had internet searches about killing her baby, and why do I not want to be a mother, post partum mothers who murder should still be charged and put into prison. This I'd disgusting that she's out!!! That poor baby
@Lisa-pu9d exactly i
This is crazy, I never thought she did anything to that baby intentionally🤷🏼♀️
Our heavenly Father knows the truth. We all pay for our sins.
Someone should have to pay for all that she’s went through!!!
and what if she did it? She gets rewarded for it?
And what if she didn't. Should she be punished for it?
@@soupnfresh she shouldn't get paid because there's alot of doubt. Have you seen her Google searches before the baby's death?
Someone should pay..and it should be her in prison
Why did she Google about feelings of hurting a baby 🤔 @@soupnfresh
I survived 911...building ONE: I suffer terribly from ptsd......but I don't think of hurting people....I only think of helping or saving people. Stop blaming ptsd. And you didn't lose your child, you took her life. You could have saved her by calling your husband to come home ASAP! No...she did not die from SID....she had the markings of your hands on her neck and head. ER said that becuase they didn't have enough info. Specialists examining the body found she died from blunt force of smothering.
15 ads
So that means that you can smother someone and if you go to counseling, prior to that, you will not go to prision??
What does "fo to prison" mean?
@@phil1517 go to prision
@lettyrodrz9940 --- what is a "prision"?
@@phil1517 when you go for vacation!
What a lot of BS. She can quit her job ? I fo not bekieve her. What about the hand print? I fo not now if the ex husband is involved. But first she says it is SIS and than she says her rx was involved. That does not fit right by me.
Its been difficult right but u did this. I just cant with her! God don't like ugly.!
wow, this is absolutely horrible. what a traumatizing thing to go through. i’m so sorry, mama, you didn’t deserve that treatment. ❤
Are u for real she pushed her babies head into the matress they found blood on her pacifier ! She killed her baby because she was crying she is an absolute monster!!!
Well, the puddle pirates seem to have covered themselves with glory here.