I have this car and I totally love it... I was debating to get between this one and a cayman but honestly I prefer this 3.0 twin turbo v6 than new cayman which is a 2.5 4 cylinder
Love the small roadster design! Being a 3.0 V6 Bi-turbo, with just a remap it would get a serious bump in power that the old (and lovely) 5.5 V8 would take lots of upgrades to keep up.
I think the slightly older 2015 5.5 V8 would keep up with a new SLC43 it’s 367BHP but after a remap if you got to 400-410 BPH it s gonna be a close race the mighty 5.5 V8 with its 421 BHP is only 0.1 of a second faster 0-60 so not much in it. Except the sound of the V8 burbling away 😊worth the extra money just for that sound
@@DJAkayManchester Oh! The V8 sound is something else! About the performance there’s a big upgrade with the modern 9 GTronic transmission vs the old and much slower 7 GTronic. I read something about the better weight distribution with the new and lighter engine, but I’m not sure about that.
I ve got a 2015 350 SLK 3.5 V6 . This newer SLC43 totally outperforms my older 350 but the interior is practically the same except the gear shift is new. The newer modern slightly smaller capacity 3.0 V6 engine with its biturbo and new 9 speed gearbox makes this a really fast fun quality convertible. I would swap mine for it all day
I'm iffy about them using the AMG brand on these cars. but i stronly agree with merc launching these cars. A more sporty profile can only benefit MB, and i bet that these cars are FAR more suitable for real humans in the real world. Good and informative video Tim. I think your description gives a good feel for this car.
Nice color on that SLC 43. Gotta love that Michigan "wilderness"! There was another video you posted a while back that looked to be shot in the USA. I thought I saw Pennsylvania plates on that vehicle(can't remember what it was right now) but might have also been Michigan. Anyway, cool footage! Rock On!
Hi shmee! The camera which was used in the new BMW M5 video was really good. I really liked that footage, is it possible to make videos with that camera?
I'm a bit disappointed in the performance of this car. The 2002 SLK32 AMG had a supercharged V-6 instead of the twin turbocharged V-6 with only 10hp less. The performance figures are almost identical with 0-60 about 4.5 seconds and 1/4 mile of about 13.0 seconds at 110mph. One would think that after 15 years they would have upped performance significantly yet this has remained static. So, for $65,000 I can have a new SLC43 AMG or for about $13,000 I could buy a used 2002 SLK32 AMG and get the same performance. M-B should do better. I've owned several SLKs and Chrysler Crossfires and the SLK32 is a screamer. I only wish any of them had three pedals.
Of course being an early 2000's Mercedes, the 2002 SLK32 AMG will break down every other week and cost thousands to repair each time. On the plus side, it'll be much nicer to look at than this ugly turd.
I don't get where you're coming from. It's a car that fulfills the expectations of it's class. If you say horsepower should be improved the longer a model is around, we would all have a 1000 hp cars by now
The reason you keep bouncing off the limiter is because the dial is not representative of where the limiter actually is on these 43 cars. Something along the lines of the dial says its at 6500 but it's actually 6250.
Neil Baldacchino The SLC has come out in replacement of the SLK. It was called the SLC in another country years before (I forgot what country it was) 😂.
If you think this is quite nice, take a drive in an SL400 and you'll start to wonder why you spent three times as much on an Aston Martin. They're awesome and genuinely usable everyday.
I really don't understand why Mercedes didn't fit the 4,0 V8 in this one. The R171 had the 5,4 V8 and the prefacelift R172 had the 5,5 V8 with over 400 HP.
How incredibly sad that the AMG 43 engines are TWIN TURBO V6s that make a lousy 362hp while their 45 engines are a SINGLE TURBO 4 CYL that make 375hp. How these engines don't make 400+ hp to compete with the likes of the M3 and M4 is beyond me.
rha600 they can, but it's a de-tuned version to appeal to people who want power but not as much and can still get accepatble fuel economy and reliability out of them
Sorry but that's a ridiculous argument. No one is buying an AMG and wanting less power. If they want something detuned for economy (reliability is not a problem) then they could buy the regular V6 that still makes 326hp (see the E400). MB screwed the deal with their entire line. The 300 series cars are not 241hp I4s, no V6 option except the 43 which as I said, even when compared to it's competition should have in the 400hp range. When you have a twin turbo V6 that doesn't even make as much as your turbo I4 you should know you screwed up.
Please show me where MB says it competes with those? It does not. And even If that were the case, that means the C63 for example competes with the M3/M4 and has FAR more HP (over 500 compared to 425) yet they didn't do the same thing with the C43? You're claiming the C43 series competes with a series in BMW's lineup while making barely 20hp more? And you're still forgetting one key point to my statement.
rha600 They say it by price point and performance. C63 is an M3/4, RS4/5 and Alfa Giulia QF rival by the same measure. The E43 is outgunned by the new M550i though.
SLC 43 or 718 Boxster S, that's the question! Well, f*ck that question: I'd actually look for a used Naturally Aspirated Boxster S or else wait for the upcoming soft-topped BMW Z5, with the Straight-6 of course! :-P Also, @9:48, what is this black coupe rolling behind the cherry-red E43??
Obviously they don't want you telling us. The car has Michigan plates but background looked more like California. What state plates were on the majority of the other cars? That would be the obvious answer.Who travels to another country and doesn't know where the plane ticket was going to? I smell a cover up.
Wow, the R172 SLK was so much better looking, that front end with the tacky ass diamante things on the grill and deformed headlights is repulsive. The interior is very nice though.
Random Car Guy Also, i wasn't criticizing them for downsizing, I was criticizing them for keeping the same names as their old cars even though those names now have no meaning behind them
43´s are not build in affalterbach and the engin is not build by " one man one engin" like all the 63´s and 65´s so for me its not a real AMG but still a great Mercedes
Schmee, I like your videos but sometimes I really feel like you're being paid for just saying nice things... every car you review is ' great or awesome' etc. Almost never, or actually never really criticizing a car... never heard you say you really don't like (something about) a car. I'm pointing it out on this video because I strongly feel you weren't enthusiastic about this car but were holding it back.
micglou I m agree with this. I ve never seen a journalist saying or writing that's the cars he tried were always the best he's ever seen?! But Tim is always saying the same things, any critic, all the car he drives seems to be perfect and the best... So two answer to explain this: He's paid by the brand to make publicity or he doesn't want to displease to the cars manufacturers hoping they continue to invite him to try some more vehicule
I found criticisms in the review-- slightly under-powered to his taste but not to drastic levels, fiddly buttons, poor ergonomics for the ride control selector, some budget materials, value for price in those want more performance-oriented driving. I think he missed the point that the wind deflector can be removed manually. He asserted it was fixed (correct me if this is AMG-specific), model perception, etc...
The SLC 43 from Mercedes-AMG introduces a new tier in the model line with character and touches from AMG. Do you like it?
cheeky 50fps shmee, cheeky
Most videos have been recently, we're doing our best to manage 50p where internet connections allow
lol
Shmee150 almost a million subscribers!!! Early congratulations to you Tim
Shmee150 its ugly in my opinion
basically Merc AMG 43's = Audi S and Merc AMG 63-65 = Audi RS. Am I correct?
That seems like a very fair comparison
toddf93 sounds right, just swap = with >
add M 240i M 550i etc = AMG 43 = Audi S and Full M2 M3 M4 etc = AMG 63-65 = Audi RS
And Cadillac's V-Sport and V, and Lexus's F-Sport and F.
Ye but you don't compare Cadillac and Lexus to the germans
I have this car and I totally love it... I was debating to get between this one and a cayman but honestly I prefer this 3.0 twin turbo v6 than new cayman which is a 2.5 4 cylinder
Tim i think this car is really overlooked i think its great everyday car
It's an easy one to overlook, and it has been fairly generalised, but out driving there's actually quite a lot to it.
i think as soon as you overcome the "womens car" prejudice you realize the slc is quite a decent car
Nice summary
...for a woman.
Or just the SLK55 Black Series 😂
I liked the last one, the SLK. It could be had with 5.5l N/A V8. In a car this small size, thats awesome!
Love the small roadster design! Being a 3.0 V6 Bi-turbo, with just a remap it would get a serious bump in power that the old (and lovely) 5.5 V8 would take lots of upgrades to keep up.
I think the slightly older 2015 5.5 V8 would keep up with a new SLC43 it’s 367BHP but after a remap if you got to 400-410 BPH it s gonna be a close race the mighty 5.5 V8 with its 421 BHP is only 0.1 of a second faster 0-60 so not much in it. Except the sound of the V8 burbling away 😊worth the extra money just for that sound
@@DJAkayManchester Oh! The V8 sound is something else! About the performance there’s a big upgrade with the modern 9 GTronic transmission vs the old and much slower 7 GTronic. I read something about the better weight distribution with the new and lighter engine, but I’m not sure about that.
Test drove the final edition one last week. That exhaust sounds amazing in sport+
I ve got a 2015 350 SLK 3.5 V6 . This newer SLC43 totally outperforms my older 350 but the interior is practically the same except the gear shift is new. The newer modern slightly smaller capacity 3.0 V6 engine with its biturbo and new 9 speed gearbox makes this a really fast fun quality convertible. I would swap mine for it all day
I swear shmee I've been watching your videos since 2014 and never missed any video if I miss it I will go back and watch it (love you)❤️🔥
I'm iffy about them using the AMG brand on these cars. but i stronly agree with merc launching these cars. A more sporty profile can only benefit MB, and i bet that these cars are FAR more suitable for real humans in the real world.
Good and informative video Tim. I think your description gives a good feel for this car.
Thanks Shmee you made my day.
Absolutely stunning. Beautiful car with a fantastic power plant.
Nearly 1 million subscribers shmee something to be proud of. I try to support your channel the best i can 😎
AMG GTR is my primary future target. I will get it one day.
Best of luck to you, work hard and you never know
Shmee150 Thanks man! It's one of the greatest Mercedes that I've ever seen!! it sounds amazing, looks great and it will always be classic to me!!!
That's right. Work hard and you never know. Nothing is for sure, even with hard work. Life isn't fair, and some people are born with huge advantages.
thank you very much Tim
Stunning colour!
remember when the SLK still had V8...
there should be an AMG SLC 63 and 63 S
yup sounded much better but my dad has the slc black series
Yea and around the same HP 15 years ago (probably a better torque curve on the v8 though), without any turbos :/
Progress.
Nice color on that SLC 43. Gotta love that Michigan "wilderness"! There was another video you posted a while back that looked to be shot in the USA. I thought I saw Pennsylvania plates on that vehicle(can't remember what it was right now) but might have also been Michigan. Anyway, cool footage! Rock On!
hi shmee150 hope you good thank you for your car vlog everyday I watch ur vid....by the way that spec of that car is amazing
A proper BRABUS chip will do the power trick.
A very diplomatic review. As if you are holding something back.
Shmee almost at 1Mil subs! been here since 50k
I wanna get one, eventually.
Thanks for doing this great video!
This car looks simply stunning!. Can i have the color code of this blue please?
Yes
Can you please tell us how much it costs like when you want it in full option ?
Lovely car shmee
What is the worst Mercedes benz you driven
I'm trying to think if I've driven many that aren't AMG models, and probably other than my mother's SLK 350 I haven't
great answer
come on ... :P
THINKS, TIM AND CREW
It's the most amazing sounding engine ever !
The 3.0L 6 cylinder
Also the beautiful DSG
(Or is it DSG?)
Supercars in England no it's a 7 speed g tronic single clutch with torque converter
The SLK VIDEO was the first shmee video unsaw
They've really improved the styling with the latest model. I quite like the color too, but I'm a bit bias toward dark blue 😎
Vraiment top et tenue de route in-cro-ya-ble !!!
Isn't that the same area where you tested the AMG GT roadster a few months ago?
At last great quality videos... Told u to get these cameras long ago...
Cameras have not changed ;)
Hi shmee!
The camera which was used in the new BMW M5 video was really good.
I really liked that footage, is it possible to make videos with that camera?
Unfortunately not, that was a really professional camera mounted on the shoulder of the camera man and connected to a rig.
Shmee, what is the "Sketchiest" situation you have been in during your travels?
That's a good question I need to think about
Certainly, also i should have added without being disparaging to any nation or event. Naturally.
I'm a bit disappointed in the performance of this car. The 2002 SLK32 AMG had a supercharged V-6 instead of the twin turbocharged V-6 with only 10hp less. The performance figures are almost identical with 0-60 about 4.5 seconds and 1/4 mile of about 13.0 seconds at 110mph. One would think that after 15 years they would have upped performance significantly yet this has remained static. So, for $65,000 I can have a new SLC43 AMG or for about $13,000 I could buy a used 2002 SLK32 AMG and get the same performance. M-B should do better. I've owned several SLKs and Chrysler Crossfires and the SLK32 is a screamer. I only wish any of them had three pedals.
Of course being an early 2000's Mercedes, the 2002 SLK32 AMG will break down every other week and cost thousands to repair each time. On the plus side, it'll be much nicer to look at than this ugly turd.
The 2002 SLK doesn't have as much technology as the slc
I don't get where you're coming from. It's a car that fulfills the expectations of it's class. If you say horsepower should be improved the longer a model is around, we would all have a 1000 hp cars by now
I really like this!
Beautiful!
How is the 9G transmission in the 43 different from the 7G in the 350? I found the 7G in the 350 to be a bit slow
Where were you in this video Tim? Just gorgeous!
Here before the people complaining about the amount of Mercedes on this channel
Is that a problem? They are making great cars!
I am guessing he watches salomondrin too. :) :) They are getting a lot of flack about all the Mercs on their channel. :)
I guess I have a lot of every brand now, oh well
new car, great looks exterior, but old interior is a let down
shmeetastic!
The heart of AMG is a V8. These lesser AMGs, S-line, M-Sport, R-lines are just diluting and screwing the performance brands.
Bob Colonelgees yep, should be all or nothing imo, they don't seem special anymore
Bob Colonelgees I Guess There's NO SLC 55 Because How Terrible The SLK 55 Was Selling..
A 415 HP 5.5 L V8 Is Always Better Than A Fake AMG
Wow. Your mother still have the SLK. I remenber you reviewing her car when you had the S5 or the Vantage.
Basically the exact same interior as the SL range (that model is due an update soon I hope)
The reason you keep bouncing off the limiter is because the dial is not representative of where the limiter actually is on these 43 cars. Something along the lines of the dial says its at 6500 but it's actually 6250.
Is that the CA upper desert?
Theres the 45s aswell e.g. A45 amg, Cla 45 and Gla 45.
Where is this recorded?
Why it does not have an amg badge on the engine?
Michael Stabelos because v6 vehicles are not true AMG but they design them
Shumang Chung ooh now I get it cool to know. Thanks :)
Tim! Can you make a review with a C43 please? :)
I shot a video with the C63 and with the E43, so it fits somewhere in that crossover
Shmee150
Okay. Thank you very much for the reply.
I've already ordered my C43, but I'm curious about your opinion. :)
What's the difference between the slc and the sl?
Neil Baldacchino The SLC has come out in replacement of the SLK. It was called the SLC in another country years before (I forgot what country it was) 😂.
hi shmee aswm vid
@ 3:15 that temperature gauge was looking a tad too high lol
that's a nice miata
GTR Wendy -
funny
for me personally: v6
If you think this is quite nice, take a drive in an SL400 and you'll start to wonder why you spent three times as much on an Aston Martin. They're awesome and genuinely usable everyday.
Looks nice but needs to be drastically lowered.
Havn't Mercedes just announced they are discontinuing the SLC at the end of the year????
Hahaha ``maybe it is not fast enough``. 250 km/h and 0 to 100km/h in 4.9 seconds is impresive.
Hi Shmee I'm Guys !
Sounds really slow for the power.
Its nice but the proportions is just not write its like to wide but short but the BMW Z4 2018 will be looking good with there m version
What does 43 stand for?
Equivalent to 4.3l naturally aspirated motor.
I'm starting to think you have a small preference fir the color blue? lol
This car is made to be remapped, adding about 100BHP and 100NMT remap this and it turns into an animal.
I really don't understand why Mercedes didn't fit the 4,0 V8 in this one. The R171 had the 5,4 V8 and the prefacelift R172 had the 5,5 V8 with over 400 HP.
Deora Carphotography Downsizing... nothing more...
If I'm gonna shell out the money for a merc like that, it needs a v8
Getting Mazda Miata vibes with this one...
My hairstylist would never own such a cool 😎 car. No
Where is the video?
VROOM-VROOM
How incredibly sad that the AMG 43 engines are TWIN TURBO V6s that make a lousy 362hp while their 45 engines are a SINGLE TURBO 4 CYL that make 375hp.
How these engines don't make 400+ hp to compete with the likes of the M3 and M4 is beyond me.
rha600 they can, but it's a de-tuned version to appeal to people who want power but not as much and can still get accepatble fuel economy and reliability out of them
Sorry but that's a ridiculous argument. No one is buying an AMG and wanting less power. If they want something detuned for economy (reliability is not a problem) then they could buy the regular V6 that still makes 326hp (see the E400). MB screwed the deal with their entire line. The 300 series cars are not 241hp I4s, no V6 option except the 43 which as I said, even when compared to it's competition should have in the 400hp range. When you have a twin turbo V6 that doesn't even make as much as your turbo I4 you should know you screwed up.
rha600 the 43 models compete with the Audi S and BMW Mxxx/x35/x40 models and in that segment they are the most powerful and aggressive
Please show me where MB says it competes with those? It does not. And even If that were the case, that means the C63 for example competes with the M3/M4 and has FAR more HP (over 500 compared to 425) yet they didn't do the same thing with the C43? You're claiming the C43 series competes with a series in BMW's lineup while making barely 20hp more?
And you're still forgetting one key point to my statement.
rha600 They say it by price point and performance. C63 is an M3/4, RS4/5 and Alfa Giulia QF rival by the same measure. The E43 is outgunned by the new M550i though.
SLC 43 or 718 Boxster S, that's the question!
Well, f*ck that question: I'd actually look for a used Naturally Aspirated Boxster S or else wait for the upcoming soft-topped BMW Z5, with the Straight-6 of course! :-P
Also, @9:48, what is this black coupe rolling behind the cherry-red E43??
MafiosoItaliano458 civic coupe
Tim you didn't say anything about the colour :D
refresh squad ! 😁 btw personally I don't like the sl series 😅
Thanks for tuning in!
Shmee150 I always tune in for your videos 😄😄😄
I appreciate the support! Thank you
Here before people complain that this is a girl's ca-
Oh wait they beat me to it.
where is d location?
I don't even know!
Obviously they don't want you telling us. The car has Michigan plates but background looked more like California. What state plates were on the majority of the other cars? That would be the obvious answer.Who travels to another country and doesn't know where the plane ticket was going to? I smell a cover up.
I prefer the Audi TT! Especially the TTRS! That's because I'm not the biggest fan of the SLC and Z4
The slc will discontinue and this might be the last generation.
SLC 43 is an upgrade from an SLK 350. SLK 55 successor doesint exist. Merc will come up with a '55' with more power for the slc.
Not quite a 63 or 65... but I wouldn't say no lol.
Wow, the R172 SLK was so much better looking, that front end with the tacky ass diamante things on the grill and deformed headlights is repulsive. The interior is very nice though.
I was going to get one but they won't give me enough for my cabriolet a class E so we didn't do it. A WM
Very sexy cruiser, too bad it has the old dashboard lay-out.
PS: 1 MILLION SUBSCRIBERS INCOMING =)
it's funny hearing Tim try to stick up for & explain the pro's to peasant vehicles... you know he never wants to step in this car ever again.
Who was here when shmee's mother had a slk350...
so you're not going to tell us where you are at?
The Pre Facelift Version, The SLK 55 AMG.. WAS BETTER!
Sad That Mercedes-AMG Had Do Downgrade It..
Shhthmmeee
pathetic naming scheme. "55" and "63" used to actually stand for something
Random Car Guy Ah yes, Americans are so ignorant. That must explain why our economy is so much better than yours.
Random Car Guy Also, i wasn't criticizing them for downsizing, I was criticizing them for keeping the same names as their old cars even though those names now have no meaning behind them
Stop complaining.
it used to stand for displacement but not anymore
+Willy Willy I just don't like dishonest marketing
Dont looks like a 360cv car, needs to be much more aggressive
From the side it looks a lot like a BMW Z4
43´s are not build in affalterbach and the engin is not build by " one man one engin" like all the 63´s and 65´s
so for me its not a real AMG but still a great Mercedes
Annnnd the tune alone from eurocharged uts it at 460HP and 528LB-FT of torque........holy fuckin shit.....
Schmee, I like your videos but sometimes I really feel like you're being paid for just saying nice things... every car you review is ' great or awesome' etc. Almost never, or actually never really criticizing a car... never heard you say you really don't like (something about) a car. I'm pointing it out on this video because I strongly feel you weren't enthusiastic about this car but were holding it back.
micglou I m agree with this. I ve never seen a journalist saying or writing that's the cars he tried were always the best he's ever seen?! But Tim is always saying the same things, any critic, all the car he drives seems to be perfect and the best... So two answer to explain this: He's paid by the brand to make publicity or he doesn't want to displease to the cars manufacturers hoping they continue to invite him to try some more vehicule
I found criticisms in the review-- slightly under-powered to his taste but not to drastic levels, fiddly buttons, poor ergonomics for the ride control selector, some budget materials, value for price in those want more performance-oriented driving. I think he missed the point that the wind deflector can be removed manually. He asserted it was fixed (correct me if this is AMG-specific), model perception, etc...