🌕 Uncovering The Truth: Did We Really Land On The Moon? Behavior Analysts Investigate 🚀
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 май 2024
- Did the moon landing really happen? Or was it a huge government conspiracy? Top behavior and body language analysts react to the moon landing press conference.
⭐JOIN OUR BODY LANGUAGE MASTERCLASS: thebehaviorpanel.com/
🔔PLEASE SUBSCRIBE: ruclips.net/user/thebehaviorpa...
👕MERCH STORE: thebehaviorpanel.myspreadshop...
😊FACEBOOK GROUP: / thebehaviorpanelists
🆂🅲🅾🆃🆃 🆁🅾🆄🆂🅴: 🔥Body Language Tactics body-language-tactics.mykajab...
🅼🅰🆁🅺 🅱🅾🆆🅳🅴🅽: ⭐ TRAIN TODAY: truthplane.mykajabi.com/store... ⭐
🅲🅷🅰🆂🅴 🅷🆄🅶🅷🅴🆂: ⭕ THE APP: www.chasehughes.com
🅶🆁🅴🅶 🅷🅰🆁🆃🅻🅴🆈: 🔥Body Language Tactics body-language-tactics.mykajab...
In 1969 Apollo 11 was the first crewed mission to land on the Moon. There were six crewed landings between 1969 and 1972, and numerous uncrewed landings. All crewed missions to the Moon were conducted by the Apollo program, with the last departing the lunar surface in December 1972. A total of twelve astronauts have landed on the Moon. This was accomplished with two pilot-astronauts flying a Lunar Module on each of six NASA missions. The missions spanned a 41-month period starting 20 July 1969, beginning with Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on Apollo 11, and ending on 14 December 1972 with Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt on Apollo 17. Cernan was the last man to step off the lunar surface.
Moon landing conspiracy theories claim that some or all elements of the Apollo program and the associated Moon landings were hoaxes staged by NASA, possibly with the aid of other organizations. The most notable claim of these conspiracy theories is that the six crewed landings (1969-1972) were faked and that twelve Apollo astronauts did not actually land on the Moon. Various groups and individuals have made claims since the mid-1970s that NASA and others knowingly misled the public into believing the landings happened, by manufacturing, tampering with, or destroying evidence including photos, telemetry tapes, radio and TV transmissions, and Moon rock samples.
Nothing in the broadcasts constitutes legal, medical, financial, or professional advice, nor does any communication on this site create any form of professional, privileged, or confidential relationship. The opinions contained in this publication reflect and represent the views and opinions of each of the individual speakers and are not the views or opinions of anyone else. All statements by the individuals in the broadcast reflect and represent their personal opinion only, based on their years of experience and study in their respective subject matters of experience and education, and, in the case of any opinion voiced in this particular publication, are based solely on the reference materials published therein. The opinions represented are just opinions, and do not intend to represent any factual claims about any specific individual, directly or inferentially, and should be understood as such. Copyright and all rights reserved.
The Behavior Panel comprises the world's top body language and behavior experts: Scott Rouse, Mark Bowden, Chase Hughes, and Greg Hartley. They analyze behavior and body language in videos of public interest. This non-partisan group aims to educate and entertain, focusing on nonverbal communication, deception detection, behavioral analysis, statement analysis, interrogation, and resistance to interrogation. Through careful examination of gestures, expressions, linguistics, and cultural context, they reveal truths and deceptions. The Behavior Panel is prominently featured on The Dr. Phil Show and has its own show on the US TV Network, Merit Street Media.
Chapters:
00:00 Moon Landing Fake Body Language Analysis
0:30 Apollo 11 press conference analysis
7:28 Differences in interview stress signals
14:45 Lunar module delay discussion
22:51 Speaker confidence and humor analysis
30:57 Eyebrow movement interpretation
38:00 Communication style analysis
45:11 Post-war aviation and lunar experiments
52:25 Challenges in lunar experiments
59:39 Astronaut's supply questions response
1:06:55 Comedy performance engagement tips
1:14:35 Press conference dynamics discussion
1:21:17 Moon surface appearance discussion
1:28:22 Buzz Aldrin's press conference response
#moonlanding #apollo #buzzaldrin #neilarmstrong #conspiracytheory #truecrime #liedetection #bodylanguage #behavioranalysis #behavioralpsychology #learnbodylanguage #thebehavioralarts #howtoreadpeople #psychology #deception #meritstreet #meritstreetmedia #thebehaviorpanel #bodylanguageanalysis #interrogation #interview
⭐JOIN OUR BODY LANGUAGE MASTERCLASS: thebehaviorpanel.com/
🔔PLEASE SUBSCRIBE: ruclips.net/user/thebehaviorpanel
👕MERCH STORE: thebehaviorpanel.myspreadshop.com/
😊FACEBOOK GROUP: facebook.com/groups/thebehaviorpanelists
🆂🅲🅾🆃🆃 🆁🅾🆄🆂🅴: 🔥Body Language Tactics body-language-tactics.mykajabi.com/body-language-tactics-landing
🅼🅰🆁🅺 🅱🅾🆆🅳🅴🅽: ⭐ FREE TRAINING: TruthAndLies.ca ⭐
🅲🅷🅰🆂🅴 🅷🆄🅶🅷🅴🆂: ⭕ THE APP: www.chasehughes.com
🅶🆁🅴🅶 🅷🅰🆁🆃🅻🅴🆈: 🔥Body Language Tactics body-language-tactics.mykajabi.com/body-language-tactics-landing
Please do some videos analyzing Candace Owens!!!! I used to really like her but something about her seems dishonest to me now, but I can't quite pinpoint why specifically. I would especially LOVE to see you breakdown her interview with Andrew Tate.
OMGGGGGG guys
you are amazing
thank you sooooo much
because this was my request
:) :) :)
yeayyyyy
looking so forward to it
Why do these guys look so unempressed.
Especially for someone who just got back from thee
MOON
I'm hearing chase on this one....all very interesting. I'm gripped
No one is joining your master class after this video!
I just watched 4 guys giving "excuses" and "divining peoples thoughts" instead of reading "behaviors".
What's even more disappointing, is that a "devils advocate" should NEVER be required when commenting on behaviors. Yes, a panel can have different takes on certain behaviors, which are then discussed, but a behavioral panel member should NEVER just try find the complete opposite reasons for behaviors ON PURPOSE. (This is what's called a Debate, not Behavioral reading).
All this episode exposed, is that even behavioral professionals can be so set on a "belief", that it makes their own behaviors questionable .
Yes I realized a while ago that behavior experts can be super biased & are totally reading the wrong thing, clearly, so, cannot trust what they say 100%. However I wouldn't go so far as to say reading body language is a waste of time, some think reading body language is pointless & I disagree with that for sure. It isn't fool proof like many things in life are not black and white.
If the earth were flat, cats would have knocked everything off by now.
@dianasponsier3567 That made me laugh 😂
@dianasponsler3567
🤣😂😆👏👏👏👌
😂😂😂
Spot on 😂
& if it were a globe all the water would have spun off. Despite 'gravity' that can hold a container ship down but can't hold a butterfly down. LOL
After the greatest human accomplishment and the first press conference expresses like a funeral. Totally bizarre.
💯as if they realize they are embarking on the biggest lie in human history thus far or they were worried sick someone would call them out on their BS.
100% bizarre, Twilight Zone should have done a NASA episode. "This is the dimension of imagination, it is an area in which we call, NASA headquarters."
@@rawveganterra twilight zone was off the air by then.
@@healthy2202
It was just another bad joke of mine sir, not serious. Yes they created "Leave It to Beaver" & other such shows, to paint a false goody-goody portrait of the country, why the hoax was going on.
I don't know who was more awkward and embarrassed , the astronauts or the panel.
I’m just here for the comments.
😂
Find mine, Moon is made of cheese. Funny replies
,😂🤣🤣
I’m loving these comments!
Ahh, social media. The perfect place to discuss politics, religion, and apparently, moon landings! 😂
Hee hee 😁
I see you playing “devil’s advocate”, Chase 😊
You know the truth. Much respect 🫡
I am not a behavioural expert but I can notice that they look rather uncomfortable cause they are hiding something. I don't know what, but that is not the attitude of people who just came from the moon, let alone pilots that accomplish the greatest feat in human history and obviously their dream. In my opinion, there is something a bit shady.
In the last 6 months, Russia, Japan, and the US failed to put even a rover on the moon. And we are in 2024. Google "japan rover landed sideways" "russia moon crash" and "Odysseus moon lander failed". All 3 failed within a couple of days of landing on the moon. All in 2024.
I was at work when the Challenger exploded. Watching the ominous scorpion-shaped cloud, my first thought was "they couldn't even get into orbit. How did they make it to the moon more than once?" Immediate skepticism.
Wait until you see the video showing that crew today. They are all Alive and barely changed their names
@@pattiedeville8302 Puhl-eaze.
@@pattiedeville8302lol yeah sure
I was in 5th grade when that happened. Our class was so excited to watch the Space Shuttle, and we watched as it happened. As young kids, we didn't understand the magnitude of what we were watching. So heartbreaking.
@@pattiedeville8302What are you smoking?
I was 3 years old when this happened, my question is…… If we had truly gone to the moon, why haven’t we been back in all of these years??
Many failed missions. The technology to go thru the radiation around the globe has not been invented still.
because we never went there in the first place....never would have made it past the van allen belt...communicating via air waves from the moon in the 60's is a joke...
Cost
@@pelicanvibe hahaha....your funny
Exactly! I was 8 yrs old at the time
It's almost painful how many signs of deception is going on in these videos
We even got a classic moment of duping delight. Neil almost lost it.
😁
And yet we can't even get thru the Van Allen Belt safely over 50 years later. And all the information on how they did it was lost somehow. Right.
There should be a behavior panel video based on this behavior panel video. Something isn’t right.
😂
Agree
@@mags6665 💯🙏
FACTS
There is just too much evidence and not a single person has come forward. So much hard work went into this event and 50 years later you don't see how everyone that could came together to make this a reality and its too bad you are this delusional about it.
A Navy guy, and Air Force guy, and a civilian walk into a bar….
And all stare at the floor....
Deeply disappointed in all but Chase.
I'd like to rename this episode: "Was The Moon Landing FAKE? Chase attempts to be objective and analyse body language whilst the others laugh at him."
Hahaha YES! Chase knew that the other three were just going to fangirl the whole time.
Seriously? Didn’t you watch the last minute of this video?
Why aren't they happy and excited about their amazing successful accomplishment?
Why should they be? It happened in 1969 ;).
Chase is the only one truly analyzing these guys.
I agree
@@zaproodas9626 Watch the video to the end. Chase breaks character and admits that he was "being that guy to make the video more interesting". You moon deniers are lacking in knowledge and understanding of basic parts of our life and history. Think please...
And yet we’ve never gone back.
@@Lkhrobertson We are going back.
@@user-bd6eo9wk9j I agree
FAKE.
Totally fake
@@UnderHisWing7That is where I disagree. It can't be 100%. The astronauts did orbit the Earth.
To manipulate the camera to take fake pic of the Earth 1/2 to the moon.
Or
If they didn't orbit the earth, there was a rocket launched for the public to see.
@@UnderHisWing7 Birds aren't real.
Someone should do a behavioral analysis of the 2 guys on the top of the screen whenever Chase is talking! 😂
Just Scott acting tired when Mark talks.
Yep. When Chase was talking I was watching Scott. Very interesting
@@Marsand100any signs of deception?
@@neolord50pro77 I know Mark's "tell" of nerves is adjusting his glasses. He never does it...but go watch the one on Prince Andrew, I think...dude adjusted like every sentence. Very noticeable. He was treading very carefully on that one.
In my opinion, they sit there with their heads down as if they did something shameful or if they are guilty of something, instead to look like the most brave people in the world for what they achieved. Nobody is like them in that moment, so they had to feel and act proud, happy!! Both leave Neil to tell they "story" and they do not even shake their hads for aproval... They look forced to stay there, and they do that only to give autenticity to the lie. I do not believe them.
These guys are catering to the narrative. Tons of respect I’ve lost for you guys. Couldn’t even finish it.
Here is the thing... they've already been brave even doing this... we all know that really right?
Tell me about it. I never thought I would the that guy who unsubscribes from the channel just because they may have an analysis that differs from mine, however in this instance, they started from a position of this is true, now lets rationalize and do mental gymnastics to the nth degree to make it fit as the truth. They lose all credibility with me on this because they weren't even able to analyze this objectively... I could care less what conclusion they come too, but they start from a place of truth and then rationalize everything so it fits in with that truth... which is redic.. A supposed behavior analyst who's incapable of being objective is as embarrassingly low as it gets. Even Chase had to take the position of devils advocate to appease him and they still threw condescension at him the whole time, just for objectively analyzing the astronauts behavior. These guys have some serious balls.
Chase is the MAN. I remember how you commented on the Lee Harvey Oswald tapes. You've got my upmost respect. I am not a big denier of the moon landing, but see many clues that call it into serious question.
Watch American Moon docu
"A funny thing happened on the way to the moon"
- "Astronauts Gone Wild"
- "American Moon"
Chase got as close as one can without angering the overlords.
Staying in their lane 100%!
You got it. The problem is, a lot of the monkeys on this site (and in society in general) don't even know there ARE overlords. They think, "We live in a democracy" and "WE are the boss" or some such deluded nonsense that amounts to a political fairy tale for adults.
@@christopher9152🙄
He angered Scott.
Who is he to bring down glorified legends? They are national heroes after all.
We can't send men to the Moon today, and we went there 57 years ago. C'mon guys[?]
It takes a huge amount of resources, manpower and finance to carry out a manned lunar landing. Between the end of the Apollo Program when the US congress cut the Apollo funding and the current Artemis Program who exactly was volunteering to provide these resources, manpower and finance? Take care.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth Elon's got the money AND the space agency and he can't do it. NASA not having the money any more is an argument that no longer holds up.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth Thank you! It costs an enormous amount of time and effort with no financial benefit. Idk why people assume it would’ve been an annual event.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth BlaH Blah wrong answer.
@@infamoussinphony4853 You asked a question. You received an answer. It may not align with your particular fantasy of choice but at least you should have the basic decency and manners not to behave like a petulant child. Take care.
Chase, I'm glad that you are sharing your experience with your brain condition. Honestly, while watching your video I lost it and cried several times. I'm so sorry that you are dealing with that, I can only imagine how horrifying the seizures are for you, we have been praying for you and as always happy to see you here! ❤🌹
Wow never noticed how uncomfortable they were. Seemed like they really didn’t want to be there.
I noticed this viewing that sometime Michael Collins or Buzz would look at Neil, or away from him, or gesticulate (fidgetspin) as Neil said something or other that made them uncomfortable. Looking at how the other men react while one of them is speaking raised my suspicions something is amiss.
They wanted to go back to the moon staged studio.
So, if Armstrong was the first one to step on the moon who set up the camera? 🤔
Im curious how we made it to the moon, but a NASA scientist said a few years ago we don't have the technology to make it to the moon, we somehow lost the technology they used to get to the moon, and we can't go to the moon now. 🤔
The camera deployed from the lem on a long rig/arm. And the technology being lost means all those factories and infrastructure that made the lems and rockets and all those capsules etc are long gone
100
Gumby was filming
Why they look guilty instead to look proud and happy?!
So true
The first time most of the behaviour panel have let's say, allowed personal feelings mar their judgement, I think two of the panel would never find any fault with these astronauts. ( nostalgia can blur the mind )
Cognitive dissonance
not the first time.
I was a moon landing fanboy growing up in the '80's and was extremely sad when I came to my senses 😥
Yes everyone probably believed at one point. I did, when I was a kid, then, slowly began to realize as I grew older, hmmm, this sounds weird, hmmm, this sounds impossible, hmmm I think they friggin' lied, hmmmm by Jove it was all a hoax?! My...mind...is...blown... 😱🤯 my trust level is now down to zero. 0️⃣
*WILLFUL IGNORANCE of MOON HOAX ENTHUSIASTS* There is no evidence that proves the Moon landings were a hoax, just hearsay and conjecture. People who are scientifically illiterate will never comprehend the mountain of empirical evidence that proves the Moon landings are an astonishing series of events in Modern History.
@@rawveganterra *THE MOON LANDING DENIERS MINDSET* Denialism is more than just another manifestation of the humdrum intricacies of our deceptions and self-deceptions. In the psychology of human behavior, denialism is a person's choice to deny reality as a way to avoid a psychologically uncomfortable truth. Denialism is an essentially irrational action that withholds the validation of a historical experience or event when a person refuses to accept an empirically verifiable reality.
@@apolloskyfacer5842
Sir are you copying and pasting?
@@rawveganterra I'll let you figure that out all by yourself.
I am completely open to either side. I don’t like the unusual bias that I feel right now.
They are all connected to the Gov in some way, they must be biased on issues as large as this.
Scott tells us at the beginning how this episode is gonna go 😅
For comparison the international space station is only 400 miles above earth, the moon is 250,000 miles away, think about that for a second..
And the present day, they have the balls to say We're going to go to Mars. More money laundering
I was a boy in 1969. Immeadiately I realized that 1/3 of American called another 1/3 of the people gullable fools. And 1/3 in the middle just said this thing cost a lot of money. Today, not much has changed.
Yeah America seems F'd.
Chase, 'At this period of time the US is number 1 organization that can manage psychological propaganda.'
This is the most accurate comment I’ve seen. Great observation, @MrMockingbird1313.
Brilliant.
America is a mess
And magically, much of the technology that made manned travel to the moon possible decades ago disappeared, so no one has "been back" since. Yeah, that sounds really plausible. There is very little reason to believe that astronauts have ever left the Earth's orbit.
I think they tried, as in the fictional movie Apollo 13, had very serious unanticipated issues, lucky to be able to turn around and get home safely. The cracked nut is they pronounced w/ certainty, "no water on the Moon"; "no atmosphere", when some of ours extends beyond the Moon, and all Moon rocks given as gifts to countries/dignitaries and kings/queens are no where to be found. Hummmmmm 🤗
The technologies had been written on a paper napkin, but a few days after the last moon landing that napkin was accidentally thrown away by the janitor. 😂
What technology disappeared? Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 went back to the moon. It stopped after 1972 bc the it cost trillions of dollars with no financial benefit. Theres no oil or diamonds up there to mine, so the government slashed the budget.
@@nomadscavenger What about Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17? Funny how the USSR’s space program never questioned it during the height of the Cold War.
I find it disturbing that the panel felt more enthused and patriotic about the trip than the actual astronauts. The panel had more to say than the astronauts also than the actual trip supposedly took.
I am glad TBP did this topic. And I am glad they presented themselves as they did.
It has led me to more Truths.
I Do Encourage TBP to watch Bart Sibrel documentaries because this Fake Moon Landing has caused murders, deaths, misuse of tax funds, etc.
There's a few episodes that warrant a behaviour panel to analyse the behaviour panel.
W
YES lol
They look like they’re on trial. They’re behaving like guilty children.
I worked for a computer chip manufacturing company and attended hundreds of meetings and quarterly meetings. This reminds me of those meetings. Very dry and data driven.
@@whitebird803 The Moon, is not a boardroom meeting for a computer chip manufacturer.
You're reading into it what you want to see. Putting your own personal 'spin' on it. It's just an interview with the press. They're tired. They didn't really want to be there. They'd had enough of the tours and the press interviews. They're all military men. They'd rather be some place else doing other things, such as being with their families. Is that too difficult for you to understand ?
@@apolloskyfacer5842I’d say that’s exactly what you’re doing! Look at your lil picture. You’re a fan boy, I get it.
Has anyone watched the “lunar module take off” any time recently? It’s absolutely hysterical. The technology outpaced their lies. Now their “proof” is hilariously bad, outdated CGI with multicoloured sparkles. Watch it. It’s good stuff.
I think Chase is being truthful and the other three are playing ‘devils advocate’
💯
I think Chase Drew the short straw and had to act like he didn't believe them. The whole time I felt like they were just making fun of anyone who had any doubts. Also, I need Scott to quit drooling over Taylor Swift or "Tay Tay " as he calls her.
🤣🤣🤣love it!!
😉
My favorite chain smoking aunt (Rita Jo) worked on the Apollo guidance system as a Raytheon contractor in Clear Lake from 1962-72.
I would always ask her why we never went back to the moon & She would always reply with the same answer. She would take a drag from her cigarette & say:
“We lost the data & the magic men are dead”
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Aunt Rita Jo sounds awesome!
@@Christine__D
🚬☣️☠️🤢
I guess she didn’t work on Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, or 17 then? Moon hoax people often don’t seem to realize that Apollo 11 was not the only moon landing mission.
We all knew when we clicked on this that a bunch of government contractors and ex spooks were never going to say anything disparaging about the Moon Landing.
Good on Chase for taking a critical look at the footage.
Just the opinion of a long time viewer, but if 3 of 4 are just going to toe the lines and repeat say the same thing in different way, just don’t do the upload. It’s a lot better when you all have a somewhat open mind.
Thanks for the info.
Ever considered that the rest of the world might have a point, and that you only see what you want to see? I mean, you must see how ridiculous it is to think everyone somehow is in on this supposed lie?
@@princepsbellum3413 then why do the episode? If it’s so obvious, then why look for lies? If the general consensus is that these gentlemen are telling the truth, then why analyze it for deception? Especially if it’s is in any way sacred to any of them. Is it just catharsis?
You in to watch people tell you what you already know? Does it make you feel better to have your bias confirmed? If there are no questions to analyze, then this is just clickbait.
Ever consider that?
@@indiansummer5122 LMAO Weren't you the one who were triggered because they didn't agree with you? You people are so self ´-unaware it's hilarious.
@@princepsbellum3413 😂 how far does this stuff go over your head? You are literally responding to my opinion bc you don’t like it. If anyone is “triggered” here I would think it’s you kettle.
You can always tell when somebody in over there head when they start rolling out either grammar corrections or making the “ you’re triggered” and other buzz words you’ve been taught to deflect from honest discourse.
Here; let me type plainly and if you would, read this slowly and maybe you’ll get it.
I often disagree with things this and many other channels say. That is what makes it interesting.
What is not interesting is getting to a topic like the Moon Landing and then just fan boying out for an hour and a half. If you have to have one person “pretend to look critically” while everyone else is running cover, that’s not interesting. And they are always encouraging feedback, so again am I not allowed to have an opinion? Is that what you’re so upset about, stranger on the internet?
Don’t get me wrong, you do seem like the kind of person who thinks “those WMD’s gotta be over there somewhere”, but some of us realize that the government has and continues to lie on a regular basis.
So, if you are going to take a critical look at parents who have a kid missing (which i absolutely think they should), then don’t bring a holy cow on if you aren’t able to separate yourself from the subject and take an honest critical look.
I’ll never try to analyze videos of my parents trying to find deception or ill will bc it would destroy my childhood my perception of my parents. I will defend them and give any excuse I can find. Same with childhood hero’s.
Now I get you don’t understand the nuance of what I am saying, but rest assured, even after all this, it’s just my opinion and I’m entitled to it. No matter how triggered triggered triggered you are. 😂
@@indiansummer5122 sweetie, I'm not the one calling for a stop of videos who don't agree with me. The lack self-awareness continues, please keep writing, you're cracking me up 🤣🤣🤣
I have doubts about the moon landing. Scared to say it cause people get VERY personally offended by a person questioning it and feel threatened and angry by someone having doubts😬 There are things that just don’t line up for me. 🤷♀️* braces for vicious attacks” 😖
How dare you
@@rkillalea6706😂
How dare you have opinions on things. This is unacceptable.
My neighbor was one of the engineers who worked on the moon landing.
I find it difficult to doubt it when I know a guy 😂😂
He's deaf and I believe in his late eighties now but he's always been a very nice man 😊
@@raayaswidler1049 You seem to think it’s supper funny that you “have a hard time doubting” why is that so funny?
I grew up believing they did it. But after watching these guys again... I see guilt on the 1st speaker... I see discust in they man to our left... it feels like they are ashamed and discusted with what they have to tell the public. The man on our right is just glad he doesn't have to tell "the story". Today... after all these years... for the first time... I have doubts.
And then watch the panel bizarrely trying to explain the obvious away....
Bart Sibrel was given a video of the astronauts faking going to the moon. The astronauts were willfully going along with it. If you would like to see it watch his documentaries.
1. ASTRONAUTS GONE WILD
2. A FUNNY THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE MOON
"A funny thing happened on the way to the moon"
- "Astronauts Gone Wild"
- "American Moon"
They let Neil to talk only, in order to not cotradict themselves by mistake and appear that everything is a lie
Watch the original conference. All 3 do talk. Neil is the head speak because he was the COMMANDER of the mission. AKA, the lead guy.
Chase you are the best. Propaganda not behavior. I see liars.
Chase really won me over with this episode. I unsubbed from the Panel & subbed him.
Re - putting in the flag, "That moment happened!" All panelists nodding except Chase. 😂 love it!
yeah, it happened because they had real cement powder that they poked real poles into - in a studio.
That's because Chase is the only one young enough to not be part of the cover up and is the only one who watched previous videos for baseline
First men on the moon would be beaming with ego, yet they all look like their parents just died. 3 week quarantine to be coached on the script and to be reminded of what happens if you don't go along (Chaffee Grissom and White) nuff said
no ego, just the facts
💯
I can tell you what conclusion these guys will come to before even watching. In no universe are these guys gonna call these American heroes liars.. just not going to happen publicly ever.
So true-they wouldn’t even chance it! The same people who think they landed on the moon think that Joe Biden is a good President!
The whole interview with the astronauts looks very suspicious to me
I couldn't listen at the end, too strange.
@@Blue-hf7xt particularly when you know that Wernher Von Braun was head honcho. 🤣🤣🤣😱
@@sophiarevel6952yup
@@sophiarevel6952
Von Braun, a Nazi connection? Weird and more weird.🐇
@@rawveganterra Wernher Von Braun was head of the Moon mission because he was one of Hitler's rocket scientist. Von Braun developed the V2 rocket.
The lunar buggy tells me everything I need to know about this hoax
WHt does it say
Sweetie, Apollo 11 didn't even have a buggy....
@@princepsbellum3413 thanks sweetie ❤️
The fact that the Apollo 11 mission did not carry a LRV tells me everything that I need to know about you basic knowledge of the topic. Take care.
The Eagle. A shopping cart looks more sturdy
They don’t look particularly happy about going to the moon and back.
Well, they were laughing and smiling too, as far as I could tell. And remember they spent 3 weeks in isolation.
Fair point.
"A funny thing happened on the way to the moon"
- "Astronauts Gone Wild"
- "American Moon"
Bart Sibrel nailed this a long time ago.
@@LkhrobertsonHe did and I finally know about him.
In your other analyses, you guys have been pretty good at peeling back "truth's protective layers". You really dropped the ball on this one.
After watching other videos recommended by commenters.
It is amazing how effective NASA, US government was in deception and propaganda that these 3 are still unable to look at 1 interview honestly.
100% fake
Unless there's proof beyond a doubt I couldn't run with 100% on things I don't actually have facts on.
I am not sure it's 100%
Some of operation could have been real. Maybe they just orbited the Earth. Maybe?
100% real.
@@TrueStoreyPBkeep repeating it maybe your soul will eventually believe it.
Birds aren't real.
So they waited 3 weeks after landing to do any sort of press conference? Cameras don't get sick.. they can also record through glass windows and such. Just seems kinda odd that they waited so long to speak about such an exciting and historic achievement - in addition to all the other odd seeming things about the moon landing and this press conference.
Yep! The quarantaine was prepping for their future public appearances.
And to this day with 4K + digital video capabilities we can not release actual footage from a Japanese lunar lander on the surface right now
The guy in brown quickly flipped his head around at the word "desert". They were in the desert
Yes. It was called the moon
wow
They look and act more like they are going on trial and facing some serious jail time. I know if I got a chance to go to the moon and come back and tell the world about it I'd be a little more excited
They were afraid someone would call them out on their BS. Years later, Buzz would assault someone who did just that.
The entire decade seemed everyone was a crook , getting assassinated ,going behind the presidents back , president getting caught being a crook and stepping down. The list goes on around this time. Vietnam I mean come on add on the facts about the greatest accomplishments in the world “ lost the technology and film.
I've read and watched everything available for and against over the past 15 years. When I watched this video 10 years ago I was convinced that they never went.
You're reading into it what you want to see. Putting your own personal 'spin' on it. It's just an interview with the press. They're tired. They didn't really want to be there. They'd had enough of the tours and the press interviews. They're all military men. They'd rather be some place else doing other things, such as being with their families. Is that too difficult for you to understand ?
@@apolloskyfacer5842keeping copying and pasting the same comment over and over convinces no one
@@Marsand100 I'm not here to convince people who are willfully ignorant. I'm here just having fun trolling the trolls and pushing back on their inane nincompoopery.
@@apolloskyfacer5842Why are they tired? From 3 weeks of quarantine?
@@none4126 Read my comment again. You're reading into it what you want to see. Putting your own personal 'spin' on it. It's just an interview with the press. They're tired. They didn't really want to be there. They'd had enough of the tours and the press interviews. They're all military men. They'd rather be some place else doing other things, such as being with their families. Is that too difficult for you to understand ?
Chase, right on with your facts! These astronauts are holding back big time, pretty obvious to me. We were more reserved back then but they're almost ready to erupt!
Stopped watching after second segment, not doing usually analysis i've seen on other subjects, just making excuses why they were behaving oddly. Clearly have preconceived bias and not an honest analysis.
Anyone find themselves reading the panel’s body language and truth meter ?
Yeah, I had to stop and rewind sometimes because I was too absorbed in watching their reactions to each other, ands wasn’t listening to what they were actually saying 😂😂
One of the supposed "moon rocks" was later analyzed and turned out to be petrified earth WOOD....
what about the Pet Rocks?
True.
Yes, it was the sample they gave to the President of Holland. They gave him a piece of petrified wood and said it was from the Moon.
Truth. They actually tested it!
Most likely pictures in a desert too. What a joke
Wow. Greg, Scott, Mark actually believe there was a landing. I was in love with Chase from the beginning, and now he's my absolute daydream soul mate 🥰 Keep living with the clear mind and opened eyes, Chase 🌟
Dude he has a wife and family calm down lol. Chase is brilliant but he already had a soul mate sorry
@nessablank1752 dude, I know. I live on a different continent and have my own family. Love doesn't have to be perv, you know
@@Ella-nx5sm I'm sure your husband loves reading your comments about your day dream soul mate. I'm reading your words not your emotions. Sorry for the miscommunication :)
They didn't say who was holding the camera when Armstrong took the first step on the moon. 🤔😳🤦
There was an external camera attached to the lunar module. They thought of that before the occasion. After all it was quite a momentous one….
It was said to be strapped to the outside of the lunar lander. It managed to hang on through the liftoff, and the pressure of the release of the boosters. Oh and the jolt of landing on the surface. Not only that, but the wizards of NASA managed to make a subsequent camera pan upwards and beam the imagery to Earth when the module finally left the moon on its way back to the orbiter. Pretty amazing technology for the mid 70s.
By the same token, I believe that the “one small step…” speech was definitely pre scripted, so he’s lying there, in my opinion
They look like 3 naughty boys talking to the headmaster
Disappointed in you guys, you let nostalgia and patriotic pride overrule your basic training. They looked scared stiff in all interviews, its like a funeral. Peter Hyatt already analysed Armstrong and said deception
You're reading into it what you want to see. Putting your own personal 'spin' on it. It's just an interview with the press. They're tired. They didn't really want to be there. They'd had enough of the tours and the press interviews. They're all military men. They'd rather be some place else doing other things, such as being with their families. Is that too difficult for you to understand ?
Once a hero always a hero. Especially if they are a childhood hero.
It's a tough position to be in, mostly for men.
Oh my sport heroes can commit crimes and men say they are innocent.
Give the behavioral panel a break.
I wish they didn't commit to a fake or true vote. Inconclusive works
No comment works
Yes every little boy loves the idea of being an astronaut. Unfortunately they never will be as there's no such thing. The fantasy has captured most men. Star Wars is a fantasy that promotes it & it has sucked many grown adult children in. Shame on them.
@@apolloskyfacer5842no, as they said, Peter hyatt already analysed this and it was persuasive.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 BOT.
These poor guys went on a very dangerous mission. When they got out of 2 weeks of quarantine in a tin can, they were sent on a world tour, like rock stars. Neil didn't sign up to be a rock star, he wanted his family and peace and quiet and back to work. This interview just shows how ticked off and fed up they are
Aluminum can.
Not to mention mentally and physically exhausted
35:17 Mark, to be fair, this could be him remembering them acting in a studio as much as it could be him remembering on the moon. No one is questioning wether or not he put a flag in the ground, just wether that ground was in a studio or the moon.
This must be the most divided the comments have ever been on TBP's channel?
Something seems way off about the astronauts behaviour in these clips. Moon landing hoax or not, their behaviour is sus and doesnt sit right with my intuition and gut
Two questions......who took the video footage and how come no one has gone back all these years?
They left an astronaut behind, Seamus McGill, he took the video. The haven't been back because Seamus is still there and very angry
@@rkillalea6706😂
So many questions lol
I am really not very familiar with this event, what is it they say who took the video footage?
@@lowandodor1150 when the craft leaves the surface of the moon, the camera pans up to follow the craft. The official story is they remote controlled it from earth, there are problems with that story
I am not a moon landing skeptic, but I will say this: It's interesting to me that Greg and Scott are not applying the same impartial rigor they normally do, and often move to excuse the body language they see in a way they would never normally do. Definitely signs of unconscious bias on their part
They can't speak the truth and go against the biggest lie of all time. Look into the topic thoroughly...
Yes it looks like the panel is compromised this time I wonder why? This was a difficult one to watch as total cover up.
astronauts are Childhood heroes. It is difficult to throw your heroes under the bus.
Especially for men.
Plus it is proof the propaganda machine of the US works very well.
@@PaperclipProphets it's not something I ever spent any time thinking about, until seeing Greg ans Scott's performance here 🤔
It's evident of how strong, rooted the government Nasa propaganda took hold. Especially on children at that time.
I encourage them to take a look at Bart Sibrel documentaries and books.
He explains how this Lie Fake Moon Landing has harmed so many people, murders, wars, huge misuse of tax money, lots of evils.
Soooo you want us to believe they landed on the moon, but Mark states the "early"projector they were using at the time weren't capable of producing enough light😂😂
Rocket science is a different field to light projection. Different fields progress at different rates. Jesus wept.
😂Exactly
Good call and we had to use tinfoil on our rabbit ears to have been able to watch this on our televisions. Who was watching it ? Everyone was that the only channel there was that came in clear.
@@bethanyhunt2704 Jesus Wept - John 11:35 KJV
As an engineer, I have to disagree with Mark (sorry, Mark!). Fidgeting is not typical at all, as it's generally unproductive. If anything, engineers do much more mental fidgeting than physical.
Chase’s eye roll when Mark basically called them autistic (neurotype)
Engineer here - I did a lot of physical fidgeting during meetings like this because my mind would be going crazy with boredom. I would much rather be working to solve a problem. I would hide my fidgeting to be polite (fiddle with my hands under the table, or when my whole body was visible I would wiggle my toes so it wasn’t visible) but for me, physical fidgeting relieved the stress of boredom while allowing my mind to be present enough to respond when spoken to. If I did mental fidgeting, I would be so caught up in interesting mental problems that I would be completely lost if I got asked for my opinion!
I asked my engineer friend what he thought. He said, hummm.
NASA National Association of Space Actors 🧑🚀🧑🚀🧑🚀😂
Only 30 minutes in and I have to say something. Guys, what the heck?! Greg, Scott, Mark. You guys usually tell us what you see, and preface it by telling us that you can't explain why you see what you see, but this is what you are witnessing. For instance, "I see a sign of deception. Don't know why they are being deceiving or what is causing that deception, but that is what I see." I have not given a direct quote from any one of you from any of your body language videos, but a generalization of how y'all normally operate. But not this time. Instead, because you know that it is obvious to us, the viewer, that we see something here that is not quite right, you are actually trying to explain away what it is you think we are seeing. And I suspect that what you think we are seeing is exactly what you are seeing. But you are noticably going out of your way to not tell us what you are seeing in their behavior. Why? Chase is doing so. But he is doing so with the caveat that even though we may be seeing something that is off in their behavior, that still, we must ignore that and pretend that all is well. I'm actually seeing deception, not just from the astronauts, but in you guys. Certainly from the astronauts there is a strong discomfort and these men are not wanting to discuss this mission. This doesn't necessarily mean that they did not go to the moon. As a matter of fact, their pre-launch interviews are not the interviews of men who were getting ready to pull the wool over the eyes of the entire world. Pre-launch, these men truly believed they were going to the moon. So what happened between before and after? Were there last minute orders to fake a moon landing? Did they make it to the moon and something happened while there that they are not allowed to talk about? I don't know. But something is dead wrong with this interview. Something happened. These men do not want to talk about it. And you gentlemen know it but you don't want to say the obvious. Maybe things improve as your video goes along. I'll have to see. Perhaps, as usual, I have jumped the gun and commented before I have the whole story. But 30 minutes on and I don't think I have ever seen you guys try to cover up for anyone as much as you are jumping through hoops to try to cover up for the behavior of these three men.
Well said thank you, having researched this topic for many years { perhaps a comment on my own life or lack there of} it turns out NASA has spilled the beans on this scam them selves many times. e.g. "We must solve the problem of the Van Allan radiation belts before sending people thru this region of space" 2014 NASA employee Kelly Smith admits. Buzz Aldrin tells a 5 yr old they haven't gone back because they didn't really go to...the...moon. He couldn't bring himself to lie to her. etc.etc.
I think they can’t tell the truth or their lives would be harmed. So this is the one time I think the guys can’t tell the truth. This was fake.
@@blingmeupbyapril6110I’ve never believed we landed on the moon & I was alive to “see it.” I don’t understand why they even bother doing these type of things if they’re afraid of someone harming them. Idk
You are exactly right!
Would you not be beaming with light and excitement if you had just been on the moon? And home alive safe and well?
That's what I'm saying! They definitely didn't go to the moon.
I personally have no skin in this but I will say (if it’s true) the scene in The Crown where prince Phillip speaks with these men and all they can do is ask about the Prince when they’ve just been on the moon was the oddest thing I could think of.
These men were in space and on the moon! What could be more awe inspiring than that? You wouldn’t get me shut up about it, if I’d done it.
Are these the faces of people who just went to the moon. Where is the pride, happiness?
Exactly!!
Lost in space.
They were combat veteran test pilots, not gregarious people.
@@patrickthomas8890so they were not human, able to express excitement. Aliens!
@@patrickthomas8890 So what?! Don't sombre veterans feel any elation for accomplishing such a unique feat as landing on the moon? They are human and they should have felt something if the event had happened.
Quit giving excuses for them and I think it was scripted
THese guys behold to NO ONE. Most have had secret to top secret clearance of military maters If there was one hint of deception, they wouldn't have done a show on it.
You would think that the astronauts would have been more nervous at the press conference before the mission with the potential of being killed on the way up, than after they got back!
My Dad retired from NASA, he worked in Houston on the testing Quality Control phases of the Gemini and Apollo programs. He passed in September just before his 99th birthday with his full mental capacity. He would choke up talking when talking about “fails” in testing because they had identified potential problems of flight and could fix them and save lives before astronauts were in space. “Space flight” talk was fascinating at the dinner table each night when I was a teen. I have NEVER doubted the reality of our lunar landing!
I know you don't want to believe your Dad was fooled by the scam, but such is the case.
They look super stressed. Their demeanor is similar to that of hostages being forced to make statements on camera.
@@kaslu1082i remember an American woman who was taken by a moo slim group in the ME. They released a hostage video and later klled her. She seemed scared like these guys.
Hostage video - exactly!
You guys, except for Chase, just lost a whole lot of trust most of us had in you. If you guys weren’t going to actually read their body language without giving excuses as to why they look like they are being deceitful, why do it? Why not give excuses to the other people you read? We see who pays Scott and Greg, that’s for sure.
Scott is not an expert. Pretends to be, unsuccessfully
Dr. PHil?
I that the two are looking down because they don’t want anyone to direct a question towards to them
Funny that they supposedly went to the Moon, and they aren't excited or happy to tell the story. It's all moot and boring. I'd be so excited to tell the story! They didn't go.
They look chagrined to me.
We did not land on the Moon nor can we now because we do not have a spacecraft where an astronaut can safely pass through the outer limits of Earth's lower orbit even NASA agrees with that right now. We did not land on the moon in 1969.
They may totally believe they did but, no earth mammals have survived outside Van Allen's belts.
How about space mammals?
@@Jezza640 haven't known of any. Have you?
Just posting this, I can see the contradiction.
Wiki: The belts endanger satellites, which must have their sensitive components protected with adequate shielding if they spend significant time near that zone. Apollo Astronauts going through the Van Allen Belts received a very low and unharmful dose of radiation.
How have the space shuttle maneuver around this Van allen's belts?
Here are the words of Dr. James Van Allen himself: "The outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable. The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." Dr. James A. Van Allen.
None of the astronauts look happy or excited to be there.
They don't call them ASTRO-NAUTS (NOTS) for nothing! 👍
Did anyone in the media at that time question this?
Now that's what you call Gatekeeping. 😂
😂🤣🤣
Hey guys, how many times around the earth can a plane fly without refueling? Ask yourself how many earths are between here and the moon. Do you think after burning so much fuel to get out of the atmosphere they had enough fuel to go there and come back? ☠️
Why did Kennedy buy this project of going to the moon?
I want to talk to the camera man that video taped it
sammme
What is the official explanation about that?
Gumby
I couldn't finish watching this. Most of you sounded like a bunch of kids defending your favorite fantasy. I was thrilled to watch it on TV as a kid, too. But as an adult, I have a lot of questions about what we were shown.
100%
Do you also have questions about the 5 other landings?
Kids defending a fantasy, indeed. Scott gave it away as he spoke of his autographed memorabilia.
Exactly propagandized and spoke more on the supposed astronauts backgrounds and what could be happening. They usually go only by facial expressions, gestures ,emotions etc. They seemed to be voting as waiting in the voting line. One even seemed frightened just like the astronaut at the other end of the table.
For those interested in exploring the moon landings further, you might want to see these videos:
- "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon"
- "Astronauts Gone Wild"
- "American Moon"
I just watched 'a funny thing happened on the way to the moon'.
The crew did have a color camera, and yet they filmed the moon landing in Black and White.
The networks complained because they operated in color.
I would have interviewed the news crews about this.
I want to believe them, but there are too many contradictory aspect to their experience, photos, and subsequent challenges of travel beyond low level orbit.
One thing is definitely true. Chase's dog is cool and really likes him a lot! Another thing that is true is that the four of you are fun to watch. Thanks guys!
Chase; glad you are blunt and brave. not an ounce of enthusiasm on their faces. monotonous voice as though reading from a script, and almost fearful side looks while the other person is answering a question from the audience ....says a lot.
NASA was a bit of a cult.
I don’t because we’ve never gone back!!
Chase is the best….💕 always honest
The panel is part half part of US military for 1. These guys did not look or give Bob Lazar, a scientist/engineer nearly the same stance as they are giving these guys. Lost all respect for them on such an obvious liars. Unsubscribed..🙃
After watching all of your videos this one seems very bias to me. Chase is the only one who did research on prior videos? It appeared that excuses were being made for their movements rather than a true analysis, truly disappointing.