People comment this over and over again. I teach and have to project my voice in a lecture room so I was in that mode when I made the video. It's my first video I've ever made so I'm learning. Since it has 100k views I didn't want to take it down and rechange it. The later videos I've made are much quieter. If it bothers you - you can turn your volume down on your computer or RUclips. Hope you found the video helpful even though my voice was loud.
I asked my 10yo brother what he would do in this situation and he said he would steal to save the wife, but before saying that he was like "depends on day" and I asked him to explain why he said that, and he said he thought he would steal only during the night so he doesn't get caught and go to jail
I love to watch ur videos. Your videos helped me a lot in school of thought and developmental psychology. Thanks a lot and keep going. I want to teach like you.
A huge thanks and huge appreciation from India Dude you just cleared the concept in few minutes and to be honest I didn't even get bored for one single second in the video I love watching other videos of yours as well Keep up the good work dude.... Thanks again
hell yeah I'm stealing that mediation. I am BIG on morals but if my significant other needs that medication to live or dies if they can't receive it then my morals are going out the window because Im not about to sit here and let my partner die.
The only thing that would stop me from stealing the drug is the fact that I'm a Christian (stage 4 or 5 morality). Looking at this from a purely secular perspective, it would def be the moral choice to finesse that drug. If you were to look at this from a deontological perspective, you'd basically be saying that the act of stealing is more significant than a human life. Most people will agree that's false and will instead look at the scenario through a utilitarianism perspective. Stealing the drug will save a life at a cost of some thousands of dollars from some pharmaceutical company which is probably swimming in wealth. It's not a given that the supply of the drug is very limited, so because the only cost is a tickle to some aggregate of millionaires, it would maximize wellbeing to a greater extent if you just stole the drug. Then after that, you need to consider the risk factor of actually stealing the drug. The prospect of being incarcerated would probably serve as a huge deterrence to many people who arrive at the conclusion that stealing the drug is the right thing to do, especially if they have no experience in theft... but if you use the same utilitarianism perspective then even a slight chance of being able to save the life outweighs the probability of getting caught.
The problem with Christianity is not that it is a deontological system of ethics, it is that an objective system of ethics derived from a supposed divine prescriber. While this may sound like a good thing, in practice it leads to an undeserved certainty in the consequences or lack thereof of your actions without giving due concern to the subjective implications reported by others. This undeserved certainty also is apparent in the epistemology of religions. Relative ethics would be equally unwise because it could be wrangled to justify any action. Unless it can be said surely that societies can collectively prescribe an objective moral system as a whole (and I don't think it can, though I could be mistaken), then subjective ethics is the only solution. And the only way that subjective ethics can be accurately used in hypotheticals such as this is by way of empathy and life experience, so I think that is the lens this theory is coming from. He is basically saying that this is a very rudimentary way to gauge peoples life experience + their levels of empathy and how that carries out in the decision-making of ethical dilemmas.
Thanks for your explaining about moral theory. It's really difficult for me due to the second language in English. I felt really clear to understand via this video for my marketing course in College. I understood this video that's not easier to create. Just want to thank you.
I can confirm stage 6 does exist indeed.. was my initial response before I started thinking deeper and was like well society expectations and legal restrictions would I really considering I have kids etc..? Tough call but without kids and to save my wife? Dare I say I would at very least I would be tempted.
Kohlberg asserted that women usually only reach stage 3 whereas men can reach higher stages with some men reaching stage 6. Is there a gender difference?
Hi, your retelling of Heniz's Dilemma is flawed. Nice video apart from that. "In Europe, a woman was near death from cancer. One drug might save her, a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The druggist was charging $2,000, ten times what the drug cost him to make. The sick woman’s husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money, but he could only get together about half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said, “No.” The husband got desperate and broke into the man’s store to steal the drug for his wife. Should the husband have done that? Why? " The extra information about how Heniz managed to gather half and the pharmacist still declined, even though he would still make a profit, adds to the overall dilemma. This is because stealing the medicine can be justified as the pharmacist shows a lack of empathy which puts Heinz in a position where he could of saved his wife if the pharmacist wasn't greedy, and now has to steal.
What if my answer is this. "I will not steal the drugs. Don't get me wrong but I really love my partner, its just that if she is having a hard time in battling the special cancer, and I can't guarantee the safety of the drugs, even if it is a painful decision, I wanted to end her suffering. I do not want to see her in pain. I will just be by her side" what stage does it fall into?
Hi! This is a great question. Your response is consistent with a conventional level, stage 3. When you say, "I love my wife and don't want to lose her", you are focused on your relationships and role as a husband. Stage 3 responses fit into that relationship category. I appreciate the question and thanks for watching the video!
WOW! I was never expecting such a speedy reply. You deserve so many followers and subscriptions. So much knowledge and clarity of concepts! Rare! Thank you God bless! I d suggest make a facebook page and an instagram study motivational page to get followers who will ultimately land to this page.
Thank you so much for the comments! Its definitely work to put this together, so I really appreciate the positive feedback. I hope that many people will find the videos useful and share them with others. We do have a Facebook and Instagram account. I will begin to post my videos on them, I haven't been as good about it recently. Thanks for the advice!
Hi there Learn My Test. I am a PhD student studying on the Defining Issues Test by James "Jim" Rest. I am currently having trouble on finding out how to measure the score on the DIT test. Care to provide some clarification on that? Thank you, Sir.
Hi Zach, Try contacting Steve Thoma at the University of Alabama's Center for Ethical Development (ethicaldevelopment.ua.edu). They should be able to provide information on how to get the DIT and use it in your research. Thanks for asking and watching the video!
The test on the website is inaccessible, it keeps saying the Question bank does not have minimum questions each time i click on the link to Take Test. Is this practice test still available to take?
Hi, thanks for watching the video! Try clicking on this link: www.learnmytest.com/Publictaketest/publicTestLink/WVAjD6vuHHoM2pKf9YQR6DcyuYp72np_Bx_xnfdEMBQ. This should include questions from concepts discussed in all my videos.
@@LearnMyTest Well I was looking specifically for Kohlberg's Theory. However I was able to gain some studying from the Theories of Development test you have on the website. But thank you anyways
What if my answer is I won't steal the drug because I don't want to risk my husband's life for possible side effects and dangers that may be associated with a drug that is not yet catered to the public? What stage am I in? And why?
What if my answer is I won't steal the drug because I don't want to risk my husband's life for possible side effects and dangers that may be associated with a drug that is not yet catered to the public?
Thanks for watching Khate. This would be a stage 3 response - because it focused on your relationship as a wife but also has some stage 1-2 because your focus is on the negative outcome that may result from not stealing the drug.
I think a lot of people mentioned - from a philosophical perspective one person cannot be more advanced in moral thinking than another another man. The other arguments are that it does not exactly correlate to moral decision making. This lead to the four component model which Rest discussed in his theories.
One is Giligan's criticism about the gender differences. Then there's the universality of the stadiums, for example stage 5 (stage 1 of post conventional stadium) is extremely rare, and the same goes for stage 6, which cannot be found at all in primitive societies, so Kohlberg had to adjust his theory a little. And last, there's a question about "regression" in moral judgments. Like, is it possible to think sometimes like you're on stage 1, even though you've reached higher levels? The answer is yes (wars, poverty etc.) which means that stadiums are not organized in hierarchical structure, as Kohlberg claimed. they're rather set of abilities that we obtain during our lives
no amount of justification is going to make it ok for you to participate in what is effectively murdering your spouse. if its within your means be it legal or not to save their life then choosing not to participate makes you effectively an accessory to her death. cant see how theft is ever going to outweigh death in any kinda moral comparison.
After watching this video.. I felt there will be a stage zero.. If a person love his wife very much... He will kidnap children of the doctor or pharmacist.. And take all the treatment until his wife will be fine.. .. If a personr DONT LOVE his wife.. He will definitely find these EXCUSES.. . Some times we mix LOVE with NEEDS.. Like i need this person... And we mix it with love... But... Every thing depends on the intensity of the relationship..
me and my husband would both go to different drs to see different options and all but if there was absolutely nothing we could do wed try and get friends and family to help and they would but if not wed do anything for eachother so yes we would is that stage 3?
That is a good question. They divided the stages up into levels like I said in the video because some people thought that stage 6 didn't exist but as I said in the video kohlherg insisted there was a stage 6. Most people look to rules and what everyone else is doing to define their moral decisions and being able to reason higher than that is hard.
Kohlberg's model is way too simplistic and assumes that moral decisions fall neatly into one of these categories. I would not steal the medicine, not because I think it's always wrong to steal, but simply because I take into consideration how difficult this particular crime would be to get away with. I would likely go to prison for a long time and leave my dying wife to fend for herself, making a bad situation worse. If there was a guarantee that I'd be able to get away with it, I would do it since big pharmaceutical companies could afford the loss. The reasoning behind this ethical decision doesn't fall squarely into one of Kohlberg's categories.
Respectfully, I disagree. Your decision not to steal because you would go to prison (that's to avoid a negative consequence) which is a state 1. Saying if I would get away with it - further justifies the stage 1 response and focus on consequences of the action. Hope this makes sense.
I have watched few videos on this and they all seem to say something different for level 1 stage 2. I asked my teacher and she just said “different individuals have different viewpoints” so I am very confused now. Can someone please explain?
They have organized them into schemas. So really stages 1 and 2 are a schema 1 = personal interests... where consequences are used to explain choices in the dilemma. Schema 2 is comprised of = stage 3 and 4 are where you use relationships, roles, rules, and norms to explain your decision with the dilemma. Schema 3 - the post-conventional schema goes beyond the rules and norms to provide an answer that supports social cooperation.
Your options are to let your wife die or steal the drug to save her. I guess you can steal the drug and sell it for 10k but you'll be caught quickly because someone just stole the pill and you're selling it soon after, very suspicious. However, theres better ways to save lives than stealing things because you risk ending your own life. You can directly help people without stealing
There is a sociological aspect to moral development. Few US adult develop past the adolescent level: stage three. We have very structurally violent nation because US adults can't think morally. All arguments against that reality will be adolescent sorts of fallacies.
why does it sound like ur constantly yelling at me?
LMAO- Facts!
People comment this over and over again. I teach and have to project my voice in a lecture room so I was in that mode when I made the video. It's my first video I've ever made so I'm learning. Since it has 100k views I didn't want to take it down and rechange it. The later videos I've made are much quieter. If it bothers you - you can turn your volume down on your computer or RUclips. Hope you found the video helpful even though my voice was loud.
Bro, its a very good video and his loud voice is energetic, he helps me remember. At least its not a monotone voice
Wow. You learned a lot for free and all you did is complain?
@@LearnMyTest no I think your voice helped me focus! Thanks for your hard work!
he sounds like a lawyer in a commercial. Call LARRY H. PARKER NOW!!!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 thanks for watching!
better call saul
I appreciate this video in prep for my upcoming licensing exam. Great energetic presentation. Thank you.
No problem! Thank you so much for watching and I'm glad it was helpful.
LET?
It is really very easy to learn theories with the animated videos
Thank you sir 🤗
Thank you so much for watching!
Super helpful. I kept reading the text and couldnt understand it. Watched this twice and I got it down in memory! Thank you!
No problem thanks for watching!
You're the real professor in this lesson, thanks so much
No problem! Glad I could help.
I am helping my daughter through her final exams. Your videos are fantastic. Thank you!
Thank you so much for watching, Veronica!
I am here for my ethics exam
Awesome thanks for watching!
Me too
I have quizzes and activities coming up for my ethics subject. Thanks for this!!!
Awesome! I'm glad you found the videos helpful! 😃
watching this for my high school freshman Human growth and development class and somehow ended up writing 3 pages of notes on a 6.5 minute video.
This explaination is better than the book I read.
I'm glad it was helpful. Thank you so much for watching! 😃
4:03 these are great examples thank you so much❤
I asked my 10yo brother what he would do in this situation and he said he would steal to save the wife, but before saying that he was like "depends on day" and I asked him to explain why he said that, and he said he thought he would steal only during the night so he doesn't get caught and go to jail
I love to watch ur videos. Your videos helped me a lot in school of thought and developmental psychology. Thanks a lot and keep going. I want to teach like you.
A huge thanks and huge appreciation from India
Dude you just cleared the concept in few minutes and to be honest I didn't even get bored for one single second in the video
I love watching other videos of yours as well
Keep up the good work dude....
Thanks again
Aysha, Thank you for your comment and watching! I'm really glad you enjoyed the videos!
hell yeah I'm stealing that mediation. I am BIG on morals but if my significant other needs that medication to live or dies if they can't receive it then my morals are going out the window because Im not about to sit here and let my partner die.
Simple enough for a student like me to digest all the infos 😍
Thank you for watching! 😀
I loved this, way better than the video my professor gave us to watch, thanks!
Thanks for watching!
The only thing that would stop me from stealing the drug is the fact that I'm a Christian (stage 4 or 5 morality). Looking at this from a purely secular perspective, it would def be the moral choice to finesse that drug. If you were to look at this from a deontological perspective, you'd basically be saying that the act of stealing is more significant than a human life. Most people will agree that's false and will instead look at the scenario through a utilitarianism perspective. Stealing the drug will save a life at a cost of some thousands of dollars from some pharmaceutical company which is probably swimming in wealth. It's not a given that the supply of the drug is very limited, so because the only cost is a tickle to some aggregate of millionaires, it would maximize wellbeing to a greater extent if you just stole the drug. Then after that, you need to consider the risk factor of actually stealing the drug. The prospect of being incarcerated would probably serve as a huge deterrence to many people who arrive at the conclusion that stealing the drug is the right thing to do, especially if they have no experience in theft... but if you use the same utilitarianism perspective then even a slight chance of being able to save the life outweighs the probability of getting caught.
The problem with Christianity is not that it is a deontological system of ethics, it is that an objective system of ethics derived from a supposed divine prescriber. While this may sound like a good thing, in practice it leads to an undeserved certainty in the consequences or lack thereof of your actions without giving due concern to the subjective implications reported by others. This undeserved certainty also is apparent in the epistemology of religions. Relative ethics would be equally unwise because it could be wrangled to justify any action. Unless it can be said surely that societies can collectively prescribe an objective moral system as a whole (and I don't think it can, though I could be mistaken), then subjective ethics is the only solution. And the only way that subjective ethics can be accurately used in hypotheticals such as this is by way of empathy and life experience, so I think that is the lens this theory is coming from. He is basically saying that this is a very rudimentary way to gauge peoples life experience + their levels of empathy and how that carries out in the decision-making of ethical dilemmas.
Thanks for your explaining about moral theory. It's really difficult for me due to the second language in English. I felt really clear to understand via this video for my marketing course in College. I understood this video that's not easier to create. Just want to thank you.
Hard concept but well explained. THANKS!!
Thanks and thanks for watching 😃
Thank you for this video. It really helps me a lot.
I can confirm stage 6 does exist indeed.. was my initial response before I started thinking deeper and was like well society expectations and legal restrictions would I really considering I have kids etc..? Tough call but without kids and to save my wife? Dare I say I would at very least I would be tempted.
Makes sense while using the same example.
Thanks
This is awesome! Thank you for making everything clear.
I’m in school for nursing & I want to be a life coach on the side like a therapist. I might just get a degree in psychology
Kohlberg asserted that women usually only reach stage 3 whereas men can reach higher stages with some men reaching stage 6. Is there a gender difference?
but he actually it was said that kohlberg only interviewed male interviewees for this theory, so i’m not quite sure about that
Great video. Thank you for breaking it down.
Gerard Murray No problem! Thanks for watching.
plz make video on Clark Hull’s Reinforcement Theory (Drive Reduction Theory)...
Anil Pandey thanks for the suggestion! That is on the list!
Thank u!!!!
Best example ever!!!
Hi, your retelling of Heniz's Dilemma is flawed. Nice video apart from that.
"In Europe, a woman was near death from cancer. One drug might save her, a form of
radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The druggist was
charging $2,000, ten times what the drug cost him to make. The sick woman’s
husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money, but he could only get
together about half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and
asked him to sell it cheaper or let him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the
druggist said, “No.” The husband got desperate and broke into the man’s store to
steal the drug for his wife. Should the husband have done that? Why? "
The extra information about how Heniz managed to gather half and the pharmacist still declined, even though he would still make a profit, adds to the overall dilemma. This is because stealing the medicine can be justified as the pharmacist shows a lack of empathy which puts Heinz in a position where he could of saved his wife if the pharmacist wasn't greedy, and now has to steal.
I know. I just wanted to tell it in my own way. But thank you for sharing.
This is class
great video - but the website isn't working for me. :(
This was fabulous. Thank you.
Thanks for watching!
Anyone else think about how US specific this situation is? In any other developed country Heinz wouldn't even have to think about stealing the drug
you're very right
I didn't find the link for the test !
Now i get it. Thanks
Thanks for watching!
Your welcome
Thank you for explaining 😊
Mae Boiser your very welcome! Glad it was helpful.
Wonderful video!!!
Thanks for watching!
this is 10/10 thank you
Your welcome!
What if my answer is this. "I will not steal the drugs. Don't get me wrong but I really love my partner, its just that if she is having a hard time in battling the special cancer, and I can't guarantee the safety of the drugs, even if it is a painful decision, I wanted to end her suffering. I do not want to see her in pain. I will just be by her side" what stage does it fall into?
I think stage 3
For my classmate she's answer no because stealing is a choice not a mistake
This was very helpful thank youuu
What if my answer was yes I would steal because I want to save her life because I just love her and donot want to lose her! What is this stage?
Hi! This is a great question. Your response is consistent with a conventional level, stage 3. When you say, "I love my wife and don't want to lose her", you are focused on your relationships and role as a husband. Stage 3 responses fit into that relationship category. I appreciate the question and thanks for watching the video!
WOW! I was never expecting such a speedy reply. You deserve so many followers and subscriptions. So much knowledge and clarity of concepts! Rare! Thank you God bless!
I d suggest make a facebook page and an instagram study motivational page to get followers who will ultimately land to this page.
Thank you so much for the comments! Its definitely work to put this together, so I really appreciate the positive feedback. I hope that many people will find the videos useful and share them with others. We do have a Facebook and Instagram account. I will begin to post my videos on them, I haven't been as good about it recently. Thanks for the advice!
Tnx so much..from Philippines
Thanks for watching!
Best Video with details.
Thank you so much for watching. I'm glad you found it helpful! 😀
@@LearnMyTest - welcome!
I didn't understand until it was yelled at me thank you will be asking my professor to scream from now on for PEAK COMPREHENSION
😂😂😂😂
Outstanding.
Great great great dear sir....
Juran Mezka Thank you so much!
Simply put: I love your stuff.
Thank you so much for watching!
Hi there Learn My Test. I am a PhD student studying on the Defining Issues Test by James "Jim" Rest. I am currently having trouble on finding out how to measure the score on the DIT test. Care to provide some clarification on that? Thank you, Sir.
Hi Zach, Try contacting Steve Thoma at the University of Alabama's Center for Ethical Development (ethicaldevelopment.ua.edu). They should be able to provide information on how to get the DIT and use it in your research. Thanks for asking and watching the video!
The test on the website is inaccessible, it keeps saying the Question bank does not have minimum questions each time i click on the link to Take Test. Is this practice test still available to take?
Hi, thanks for watching the video! Try clicking on this link: www.learnmytest.com/Publictaketest/publicTestLink/WVAjD6vuHHoM2pKf9YQR6DcyuYp72np_Bx_xnfdEMBQ. This should include questions from concepts discussed in all my videos.
@@LearnMyTest Well I was looking specifically for Kohlberg's Theory. However I was able to gain some studying from the Theories of Development test you have on the website. But thank you anyways
@@pick6817 no problem! I'm sorry I couldn't get you on more specific.
Thank you
What if my answer is I won't steal the drug because I don't want to risk my husband's life for possible side effects and dangers that may be associated with a drug that is not yet catered to the public? What stage am I in? And why?
Hi Khate - this would be considered a stage 1 response because you are focused on the consequences of taking the drug.
I'm just confused about the ages... What age do these stages relate to?
What if my answer is I won't steal the drug because I don't want to risk my husband's life for possible side effects and dangers that may be associated with a drug that is not yet catered to the public?
Thanks for watching Khate. This would be a stage 3 response - because it focused on your relationship as a wife but also has some stage 1-2 because your focus is on the negative outcome that may result from not stealing the drug.
Is this theory still applicable even today?. Why?
This guy almost sounds like Trevor Moore. RIP Trevor.
If I said, I would steal because "she needs it," which stage does that fall under?
I don't think that would be enough information to score it
I'm sorry, what? I couldn't hear you there.
Do you want me to talk louder for the next one?
Thank you for explaining～
Your so welcome! Thank you for watching!
What about stage 7?
Yes
Thanks for watching!
What are other criticisms about Kohlbergs theory?
I think a lot of people mentioned - from a philosophical perspective one person cannot be more advanced in moral thinking than another another man. The other arguments are that it does not exactly correlate to moral decision making. This lead to the four component model which Rest discussed in his theories.
One is Giligan's criticism about the gender differences. Then there's the universality of the stadiums, for example stage 5 (stage 1 of post conventional stadium) is extremely rare, and the same goes for stage 6, which cannot be found at all in primitive societies, so Kohlberg had to adjust his theory a little. And last, there's a question about "regression" in moral judgments. Like, is it possible to think sometimes like you're on stage 1, even though you've reached higher levels? The answer is yes (wars, poverty etc.) which means that stadiums are not organized in hierarchical structure, as Kohlberg claimed. they're rather set of abilities that we obtain during our lives
Hell yeah because I love my BF(my future husband) what I will do with my morality n dharma if he not there with me.
no amount of justification is going to make it ok for you to participate in what is effectively murdering your spouse. if its within your means be it legal or not to save their life then choosing not to participate makes you effectively an accessory to her death. cant see how theft is ever going to outweigh death in any kinda moral comparison.
Least aggressive psychodynamic psychologist.
Just came here to review the content of my Ethics class and honestly, i feel so attacked right now.
After watching this video.. I felt there will be a stage zero.. If a person love his wife very much... He will kidnap children of the doctor or pharmacist.. And take all the treatment until his wife will be fine.. .. If a personr DONT LOVE his wife.. He will definitely find these EXCUSES.. . Some times we mix LOVE with NEEDS.. Like i need this person... And we mix it with love... But... Every thing depends on the intensity of the relationship..
Saved me bro !
me and my husband would both go to different drs to see different options and all but if there was absolutely nothing we could do wed try and get friends and family to help and they would but if not wed do anything for eachother so yes we would is that stage 3?
I agree that this would be stage 3 since your focus is on friends and family.
Is stage 6 linked to utilitarianism?
Stop yelling at me teacher!
No i wouldnt steal drugs
Why is he screaming.
Hey, why was it difficult for us to reach stage 6?
That is a good question. They divided the stages up into levels like I said in the video because some people thought that stage 6 didn't exist but as I said in the video kohlherg insisted there was a stage 6. Most people look to rules and what everyone else is doing to define their moral decisions and being able to reason higher than that is hard.
Wasn't it $4000
Kohlberg's model is way too simplistic and assumes that moral decisions fall neatly into one of these categories. I would not steal the medicine, not because I think it's always wrong to steal, but simply because I take into consideration how difficult this particular crime would be to get away with. I would likely go to prison for a long time and leave my dying wife to fend for herself, making a bad situation worse. If there was a guarantee that I'd be able to get away with it, I would do it since big pharmaceutical companies could afford the loss. The reasoning behind this ethical decision doesn't fall squarely into one of Kohlberg's categories.
Respectfully, I disagree. Your decision not to steal because you would go to prison (that's to avoid a negative consequence) which is a state 1. Saying if I would get away with it - further justifies the stage 1 response and focus on consequences of the action. Hope this makes sense.
Anybody can make me understand about stage 5 please?
Soo good
Velisa Sishuba thanks!
Why are you yelling?
I want to make sure you can hear me
Came her bc lms wouldn't allow horizontal full screen nor screen rotation to view dis lesson. 🙄 It's for ethics and the exam's next week.
Plot twist; the wife cheated you or has been super irresponsible emotionally. Would you still try to save her?
That's definitely an interesting plot twist!
I have watched few videos on this and they all seem to say something different for level 1 stage 2. I asked my teacher and she just said “different individuals have different viewpoints” so I am very confused now.
Can someone please explain?
They have organized them into schemas. So really stages 1 and 2 are a schema 1 = personal interests... where consequences are used to explain choices in the dilemma. Schema 2 is comprised of = stage 3 and 4 are where you use relationships, roles, rules, and norms to explain your decision with the dilemma. Schema 3 - the post-conventional schema goes beyond the rules and norms to provide an answer that supports social cooperation.
Learn My Test
Thank you so much that really helped
yes ...
I want save the life first
Thanks for watching!
So am i level 6 if i sead i woildnt because i could save more lives with 10k or am i just heart less
You don’t have 10k that’s why you have to steal the drug.
Your options are to let your wife die or steal the drug to save her. I guess you can steal the drug and sell it for 10k but you'll be caught quickly because someone just stole the pill and you're selling it soon after, very suspicious. However, theres better ways to save lives than stealing things because you risk ending your own life. You can directly help people without stealing
i'm stage 6. im so special :D
How's that for irony?
I wouldn't steal the drug because I can just get a new wife.
I'd sell my car or house to save my wife if none of the other things worked.
i think im in stage 6
That's pretty rare!
You are not in your classroom prof!!! dont yell lol
calm down
why are you screaming
I want to make sure everyone watching hears me
@@LearnMyTest ahh okay, good video
😊
The content is good, but this guy sounds like he is angry or something
I'm not angry. Just enthusiastic about the topic! Thanks for watching.
Americans are loud
@@MrDanMac 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
bring ear plugs for a conversation with this guy . wow . but thank you
Hope this explains everything. I'm a Jewish man
Sure would and then sure the evils.
❤️💙💙
Thompson Joseph Hall Laura Thomas Barbara
There is a sociological aspect to moral development. Few US adult develop past the adolescent level: stage three.
We have very structurally violent nation because US adults can't think morally.
All arguments against that reality will be adolescent sorts of fallacies.