I made it to 7:11 and then my brian just couldn't take anymore. I love the topic. The information is interesting. But, it's obvious that the intent was to take 2 minutes of text and stretch it into 12:34 of agonizingly slow and repetitive AI voiceover.
Mankind,at each era of time,think that they are the most knowledgeable and what they think is the way everything must be..just look at our past and you will see that they just guess
So we can build a telescope that can spot an object 14 billion years old and millions of light years away but we still cant build a telescope that can spot a rock on the moon ?
The perception of the Hubble constant”s expansion is misinterpreted. More like a spaghettification of a universe on its way to the great attractor. The ancient symbol of the OUROBOROS was known many centuries before . The CMB may be the accretion disk residue of an event horizon that was breached over 13.8 billion years ago. So tell me where else would a flat universe be heading?
I don't like the way hollywood and the makers of these videos make it look like stars and galaxies will wizz by if you are moving fast enough. Even at 100 times the speed of light it wouldn't look like that. Stars are light years away from each other. Also the stars wizzing by remain small like light bulbs, if you were close enough for it to appear to wizz by it would fill your field of view
For real, any English teacher of mine would give this video a fat C or maybe D, you’d expect them to atleast proofread what the ai generates but aptly not
No, it is just the "ScieNtiSTs" that get more insane and out of touch with reality as they attempt to force observations to fit General Relativity, which is a demonstrably false theory.
It's likely because there is an extra component to redshift, aka intrinsic redshift, so that z 14 object maybe isn't 13.6b years old, but much younger.
The problem is if it’s actually younger the light wouldn’t be here to see……unless you mean the light we are seeing is from when it was younger then yes…..?
Big deal. All of this is about theories.. i.e. ideas.. what we THINK is out there. Who's been there to make sure it's accurate? No-one. When will be be able to? Never. All this conjecture is unprovable and any almost any theory is valid as an idea.
The fact "scientist" wanted to force their "agreed and proven" ideas instead of learning and possibly learning new things.. And holy hell, how many times can the same statement be made to extent this video?!?!
Scientists look into space and observe things that they do not understand. It seems that they must then use a basic "earthbound" maths system to generate equations. If they can make what they observe fit into their "blackboard" equation they seem to think that they have proved something.
Come on...These astrophysicists e.g Hubble, Miku Kaku, Hawking's, Greene and Cox don't know 'Jack $***'. It's time to ditch the 'Caveman' approach and get some real brains to figure out the origins of the universe.
It's been shown that the milky way and our solar system are traveling through an old supernova remnant where there is less matter within our area. Should have known that by now if this channel is truly scientific
There is no dark energy or any accelerating expansion of the universe and I can prove it, I just can't get my research paper onto the arxiv repository as I need endorsement and I'm just an independent researcher. It's such a dumb gatekeeping method that limits potential advancement for humanity and our understanding of the universe.
@@devoncomaroff7572 it's not debunking redshift which is still very much a thing, it's all a matter of perspective. I'm currently working on producing my work in the form of a video instead but I have to learn how to use new software such as blender in order to visually demonstrate it and create a dated publicised record of the work.
@@devoncomaroff7572 it's not debunking redshift which is still very much a thing, it's all a matter of perspective. I'm currently working on producing my work in the form of a video instead but I have to learn how to use new software such as blender in order to visually demonstrate it and create a dated publicised record of the work.
@@devoncomaroff7572 it's not debunking redshift at all, it's simply all just a matter of perspective. I'm currently working on producing my work in the form of a video instead but I have to learn how to use new software such as blender in order to visually demonstrate it and create a publicized record of my work with a time stamp.
First they say the universe is expanding, then they will start convincing people the universe is just breathing. According to which laws it dilates? Why? What does it prove?
1988 - expansion rate slowing - age 13.8b years 2020 - expansion rate speeding up - age 13.8b years.. Everything is moving away from Everything except for Andromeda which is heading right at us...
Gravity nudges galaxies toward one another-sometimes two, sometimes more-until they meet, their contents whooshing and mixing, and the slow-moving chaos molds them all into one big galactic ball.
Big bang Theory that they cling on is a crap. 😂😂😂. The universe is expanding in all parts of it not from a specific point. I hope a more reliable theory will arise from all this misleading information, if not, human race will not be able to move on. -Frieza😅😂
After they turn blind eye of the following.. 1. Mega structures like pyramid of egyp and others mega structures which is imposible for early humas to create. 2. All accounts wrtten in the Bible and and the book of genesis,book of jubilee,Book of Enoch. -Now the are going to turn blind eye on james weeb discovery..
So many decades wasted on an unbelievably primitive hypothesis. The big bang will go into history along with things like geocentrism, phlogiston, or aether. Science has stepped on the same rake once more.
@@devoncomaroff7572 Looks like we don't have any. And judging by the similar past situations, when it emerges we will recognize its correctness immediately. Like what happened with epicycles. Before Copernicus, explanations of epicycles were ridiculously artificial and clumsy. And as soon as it appeared, the only question about it was how on Earth could not people figure it out for so many centuries. The same must happen with the cosmological redshift puzzle. Mainstream scientists refuse to think seriously about radically different explanations precisely because this would need to admit our profound stupidity.
Bunch of crappy physics they give Nobel prizes for… there is no accelerating expansion. Those redshifts are in the past, not the present. The closer you get to us (the present) the lower the redshift becomes. The universe is decelerating…. From a faster rate in the past….
Theory has it that space is expanding at the same rate everywhere except for some possible localized anomalies. The increasing red shift is due to the “stacking effect”. Like a spring where each coil expands at the same rate but the coils farther from the fixed end move faster.
The redshift is not caused by space expanding. The redshift is caused by gravitational acceleration of light. This phenomena was proved by the Pound Rebka and Pound Snider Experiments. Relativists like to either pretend these experiments never happened or make false claims about what the papers say because the results violate relativity. Light that is accelerating cannot have a constant speed. This is also throwing off all their distance calculations.
@@burnerjack01 ahhh, so now magical expanding nothing is accelerating magic expanding nothing? I’m still waiting for someone to admit to an ether since they constantly want to bend, expand and accelerate space…..
I want to believe we shall discover Blue Light ,,, objects coming towards us . Not talking about Andromida . There could be another Universe getting closer .
Trust in the Lord with all your heart. Do not lean on your own understanding. In all your ways acknowledge Him, and He will make straight your paths. This goes for scientific discovery as well.
The event called the big bang and the events of the next billion years clearly had vastly different Newtonian physics giving rise to a huge lack of knowledge about how matter and energy behave, not unlike the black hole or magnatron star, we know so little. What we do know is more than anybody has ever known about how the fuck did we get here. If I had to question everything to learn more then so be it. The moment you need to cling to a model you loose the ability to think of something new... Failures only guaranteed if yu dont try :0
![[DOKKAN BATTLE] Worldwide Campaign Announcement Video Part 2!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JpT5Voak6WA/mqdefault.jpg)
I made it to 7:11 and then my brian just couldn't take anymore. I love the topic. The information is interesting. But, it's obvious that the intent was to take 2 minutes of text and stretch it into 12:34 of agonizingly slow and repetitive AI voiceover.
Mankind,at each era of time,think that they are the most knowledgeable and what they think is the way everything must be..just look at our past and you will see that they just guess
It's all imagination.
Scientists have no clue what those are.
They really don't. BUT, with more funding...
They STILL won't know.
Lightening bug flew in front of the telescope and they go Wow! I wonder what that is.
Even if they did I doubt they'd tell us.
@@GideonFerrante “Those that know don’t say. Those that say don’t know.” Found these words true more often than not.
@@burnerjack01 Perfect summary!
What if observed red shift is not caused by expansion at all?
So we can build a telescope that can spot an object 14 billion years old and millions of light years away but we still cant build a telescope that can spot a rock on the moon ?
Donate more money to get what you want
I can go to sleep now, the voice and the (repeated) content made me tired, your cosmic fairy tale is my sleeping pill during the summer lull...
The perception of the Hubble constant”s expansion is misinterpreted. More like a spaghettification of a universe on its way to the great attractor. The ancient symbol of the OUROBOROS was known many centuries before . The CMB may be the accretion disk residue of an event horizon that was breached over 13.8 billion years ago. So tell me where else would a flat universe be heading?
How many more of these videos can they make that say the exact same thing?
It's one of the most efficient clickbaits for today, what do you want?
Not only didn't it state what they are, but they never asked the question!
An infinite number. Expanding at a faster and faster rate.
I don't like the way hollywood and the makers of these videos make it look like stars and galaxies will wizz by if you are moving fast enough. Even at 100 times the speed of light it wouldn't look like that. Stars are light years away from each other. Also the stars wizzing by remain small like light bulbs, if you were close enough for it to appear to wizz by it would fill your field of view
The only thing human need to do is getting the real insight to truly know what universe is. 😅
The answer is 42.
Ha hahahaha!
Do you mean its not 13.8b old , its 42b old???
Just ask the mices
Please hire me as the new writer of your text! Please? I mean holy mother of redundantly unnecessary words!
it's ai generated
For real, any English teacher of mine would give this video a fat C or maybe D, you’d expect them to atleast proofread what the ai generates but aptly not
Maybe every 30 years the redshift gets even more bizarre or out of touch with the models.
No, it is just the "ScieNtiSTs" that get more insane and out of touch with reality as they attempt to force observations to fit General Relativity, which is a demonstrably false theory.
Now we need an even bigger telescope to see "further" than JWST.
To peak beyond the Big Bang? 😅
I still say they forgot the E with all the matter and antimatter collisions.
It's likely because there is an extra component to redshift, aka intrinsic redshift, so that z 14 object maybe isn't 13.6b years old, but much younger.
I think Halton Arp will get his Nobel after all.
The problem is if it’s actually younger the light wouldn’t be here to see……unless you mean the light we are seeing is from when it was younger then yes…..?
Big deal. All of this is about theories.. i.e. ideas.. what we THINK is out there.
Who's been there to make sure it's accurate? No-one.
When will be be able to? Never.
All this conjecture is unprovable and any almost any theory is valid as an idea.
The fact "scientist" wanted to force their "agreed and proven" ideas instead of learning and possibly learning new things..
And holy hell, how many times can the same statement be made to extent this video?!?!
Scientists look into space and observe things that they do not understand. It seems that they must then use a basic "earthbound" maths system to generate equations. If they can make what they observe fit into their "blackboard" equation they seem to think that they have proved something.
Come on...These astrophysicists e.g Hubble, Miku Kaku, Hawking's, Greene and Cox don't know 'Jack $***'. It's time to ditch the 'Caveman' approach and get some real brains to figure out the origins of the universe.
You volunteering?
The answer to how fast galaxies separate is 67.4 kilometers per second per Mega parsec : or 41.9 miles per second.
A weird Deja Vu of space creation expansion and compression.
It's been shown that the milky way and our solar system are traveling through an old supernova remnant where there is less matter within our area. Should have known that by now if this channel is truly scientific
There is no dark energy or any accelerating expansion of the universe and I can prove it, I just can't get my research paper onto the arxiv repository as I need endorsement and I'm just an independent researcher. It's such a dumb gatekeeping method that limits potential advancement for humanity and our understanding of the universe.
I hate when that happens
Well I'm interested. Debunk redshift for me please?
@@devoncomaroff7572 it's not debunking redshift which is still very much a thing, it's all a matter of perspective. I'm currently working on producing my work in the form of a video instead but I have to learn how to use new software such as blender in order to visually demonstrate it and create a dated publicised record of the work.
@@devoncomaroff7572 it's not debunking redshift which is still very much a thing, it's all a matter of perspective. I'm currently working on producing my work in the form of a video instead but I have to learn how to use new software such as blender in order to visually demonstrate it and create a dated publicised record of the work.
@@devoncomaroff7572 it's not debunking redshift at all, it's simply all just a matter of perspective. I'm currently working on producing my work in the form of a video instead but I have to learn how to use new software such as blender in order to visually demonstrate it and create a publicized record of my work with a time stamp.
Why does mankind need to know anything about space since he is earthbound by empty space and can never leave his home planet.
First they say the universe is expanding, then they will start convincing people the universe is just breathing. According to which laws it dilates? Why? What does it prove?
1988 - expansion rate slowing - age 13.8b years
2020 - expansion rate speeding up - age 13.8b years..
Everything is moving away from Everything except for Andromeda which is heading right at us...
So can you explain to me how some galaxies merge into others? if they all are moving at the same speed?
Gravity nudges galaxies toward one another-sometimes two, sometimes more-until they meet, their contents whooshing and mixing, and the slow-moving chaos molds them all into one big galactic ball.
But not the same direction 🤔
Yeah, that one bothered me too, but then I thought about gravity, and the veil lifted.
@@michaelmiranda8670 Yeah, logic says to me it can't happen yet it does so it must be gravity causing the collisions.🤷♂
KILO'METERS, not kalamaduhz.
"Experts".... gimme a break!
For probably not wath was done the big bang explosion
Ok scientists repeat after me: I. Don’t. Know.
Big bang Theory that they cling on is a crap. 😂😂😂. The universe is expanding in all parts of it not from a specific point. I hope a more reliable theory will arise from all this misleading information, if not, human race will not be able to move on. -Frieza😅😂
Sounds like what happened in the beginning was an act of creation???
God is amazing “hallelujah “hallelujah” hallelujah” 🙏🏻 Amen
Does this mean Darwins theory of the Planet of the Apes in Reverse is no longer viable ?
After they turn blind eye of the following..
1. Mega structures like pyramid of egyp and others mega structures which is imposible for early humas to create.
2. All accounts wrtten in the Bible and and the book of genesis,book of jubilee,Book of Enoch.
-Now the are going to turn blind eye on james weeb discovery..
Your error is that dark matter does not exist at all. The only dark matter is your ego.
The Almighty is laughin at man, there is no big bang, just him, I love science but to that end
Santa and the Easter bunny are also laughing
No intelligence here.
The heavens declare the glory of God!
😂 can't even tell what's on 🌍🌏🌎 and you now somethings came before 🦄🕳💤😀
2 funny.
So many decades wasted on an unbelievably primitive hypothesis. The big bang will go into history along with things like geocentrism, phlogiston, or aether. Science has stepped on the same rake once more.
What's the correct hypothesis?
@@devoncomaroff7572 Looks like we don't have any. And judging by the similar past situations, when it emerges we will recognize its correctness immediately. Like what happened with epicycles. Before Copernicus, explanations of epicycles were ridiculously artificial and clumsy. And as soon as it appeared, the only question about it was how on Earth could not people figure it out for so many centuries. The same must happen with the cosmological redshift puzzle. Mainstream scientists refuse to think seriously about radically different explanations precisely because this would need to admit our profound stupidity.
Bunch of crappy physics they give Nobel prizes for… there is no accelerating expansion. Those redshifts are in the past, not the present. The closer you get to us (the present) the lower the redshift becomes. The universe is decelerating…. From a faster rate in the past….
Theory has it that space is expanding at the same rate everywhere except for some possible localized anomalies.
The increasing red shift is due to the “stacking effect”. Like a spring where each coil expands at the same rate but the coils farther from the fixed end move faster.
That's okay you're usually not the smartest one in the room anyway.
The redshift is not caused by space expanding. The redshift is caused by gravitational acceleration of light. This phenomena was proved by the Pound Rebka and Pound Snider Experiments. Relativists like to either pretend these experiments never happened or make false claims about what the papers say because the results violate relativity. Light that is accelerating cannot have a constant speed. This is also throwing off all their distance calculations.
@@Cad97D Insults?
How to tell someone you have no legitimate argument without actually saying it. Good job!👍
@@burnerjack01 ahhh, so now magical expanding nothing is accelerating magic expanding nothing?
I’m still waiting for someone to admit to an ether since they constantly want to bend, expand and accelerate space…..
SUPPOSE TO FIND A BLACK HOLE FIRST ALTER BLOOD
I want to believe we shall discover Blue Light ,,, objects coming towards us . Not talking about Andromida . There could be another Universe getting closer .
Trust in the Lord with all your heart. Do not lean on your own understanding. In all your ways acknowledge Him, and He will make straight your paths. This goes for scientific discovery as well.
The event called the big bang and the events of the next billion years clearly had vastly different Newtonian physics giving rise to a huge lack of knowledge about how matter and energy behave, not unlike the black hole or magnatron star, we know so little. What we do know is more than anybody has ever known about how the fuck did we get here. If I had to question everything to learn more then so be it. The moment you need to cling to a model you loose the ability to think of something new...
Failures only guaranteed if yu dont try :0