The History of Indo-Iranians. Aryan ancestry from Sintashta in percentages. 2200 BCE - 2024 CE
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 сен 2024
- This map shows the spread of Indo-Iranians from the Sintashta culture 4200 years ago to this day. It also shows the percentage of proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry, that is, Sintashta ancestry.
Articles:
The formation of human populations in South
and Central Asia
An Ancient Harappan Genome Lacks Ancestry
from Steppe Pastoralists or Iranian Farmers
Shifts in the Genetic Landscape of the Western
Eurasian Steppe Associated with the Beginning
and End of the Scythian Dominance
A Dynamic 6,000-Year Genetic History of
Eurasia's Eastern Steppe
137 ancient human genomes from across the
Eurasian steps
Triangulation supports agricultural spread of
the Transeurasian languages
The genetic origin of Huns, Avars, and
conquering Hungarians
Ancient genomes reveal origin and rapid trans-
Eurasian migration of 7th century Avar elites
Music:
Merlean - Adventures in India
Crusader Kings 2 Songs of India - Alauddin
besieges Chittor
Across the Ocean
Medieval 2Total War Soundtrack-Crack Your
Head With A Tabla
This is the real ancestry of the Buddha
Perfect accurate✅✅✅
Your spelling is not very accurate curry boy india 🦃😂
@@Liam-eo5dythanks for correcting me mehmet.
@@Liam-eo5dy🤜🤜🤜🪳🪳🪳🪳
@@Liam-eo5dy🦃 Turk imagine not being indo european
@@Liam-eo5dynorth indian stepe ancestry goes upto 50% while turk have no steepe ancesty
I am iranan i love Aryans ❤
Why did you ignore Rors? They're more Steppe shifted than Jats... Why the hell did you ignore Rors?
Not anymore. Some recent Jaat samples have showed some of the highest sintashta ancestry ever (~45%)
interesting, coming from the forests to the steppe, intermixing with the altaic people, then retreating to the mountains and plateaus of the south while the bulk of their proto ancestry gets spread across the continent by the turks and mongols
Linguistics today doubt that Altaic is a real language family. They just say Turkic and Mongolic, a connection between the two families cannot be proven.
@@Ravie3 Sure they can.
The word for arm/hand (these languages tend to use the same word for both):
Proto-Japonic: ta(r)i
Proto-Koreanic: tali
Proto-Mongolic: gar
Proto-Turkic: kar(i)
In Mongolic languages the word for arm has developed a martial sense of flank or wing of an army, while in Turkic it has developed into a more merchantile sense of a unit of measurement, usually ranging between the length of a forearm (cubit) to the length of 2 arms.
The divergence in connotation from a word that originally referred to the same thing suggests a common origin rather than a loanword.
@@siyacer My dude, don’t do amateur linguistics research, leave it to the experts. Neighboring languages, through contact, can share vocabulary or even sound/grammar changes, which is why determining what’s a cognate and what’s a loanword can be so difficult to figure out. The professionals who study this for a living say that there’s no concrete evidence that Turkic and Mongolic stem from a common root.
@@Ravie3 Did you seriously just call a paraphrasing of an actual peer-reviewed article "amateur linguistics research". Sure, if you love your "experts" so much, here's an article on the topic. Search up "Triangulation supports agricultural spread of the Transeurasian languages"
@@Ravie3 😂😂😂 aferin siz bu kafayla devam edin
do you know anything about khasas ?
Turkestan geography has east eurasian dna more than indo iranian
Yup, I'm a pashtun and got 34 percent steppe ancestry in my DNA test. 22.6% European in illustrativeDNA
I am Jat from west uttar pradesh bijnor district I have 42% stepee ancestry
@@vaibhav_Jat jats have more haha, I had a huge chunk of zagros and anatolian. BMCI
@@maseehwardak6055 yeh you have Anatolian farmer dna also but in india haryana and west uttarpradesh jats have very high stepee ancestry and in some ror community also in haryana and west Uttar Pradesh side other Indian are Iranian neolithic farmer only jats and some ror have high stepee ancestry in india brother
@@vaibhav_Jat here's my full illustrative DNA
38.4 zagros
22.6 Europe.
18.8 anatolia
7.6 amur river
7.2 ancient Indian
5.4 Caucasian
@@maseehwardak6055 really high Amur for a Pashtun
Nicely done, man 👍🏻 Thank you for putting so much effort 💝😊
This map is not really correct, and not complete either.
The Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry map of South Asia highly correlates with the linguistic map of South Asia except for some regions like Uttara Kannada (North Karnataka, India) which is linguistically mostly Dravidian but their speakers have similar levels of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry as people from Southern Maharashtra who mostly speak Konkani which is an Indo-Aryan language. Also southern parts of Chattisgarh which has one of the lowest levels of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry but their people speak an Indo-Aryan language.
Apparently, afaik, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Odisha region was mostly occupied by various hunter and farmer tribals, and spoke various lost languages in the past, before they homogenized by switching to Kol, Munda and Prakrit tongues.
Alas, I did not find so many genomes in India, probably because I mainly used Vahaduo. For example, I am missing the genomes of Marathis, Konkanis, Sinhala, Assama and Odia. That's why I've outlined them roughly. I would be very grateful if you shared the sources from where you got the genomes.
@@The_Geographer_MapsIranians are arabic people, same genes and dna with arabs, this iranian arab made this un scientific imagination geographic youtube page 🐪🐫🐵🐒🍌🇮🇷
@@The_Geographer_Maps Also, malayali brahmins from the southern part of india, have about 20% sintashta ancestry even though they speak a dravidian language.
Amazing map. Thank you.
I am iranan i love Aryans ❤
@yxzhvw348 none of your business
So do I as an Indian
@@iamzeus7368great response to that good job
@@soumyajitsingha9614 During the Neolithic, East Iranian farmers settled in northwestern South Asia and mixed with the native South Asian hunter-gatherers, creating the Indus Valley Civilization. Eventually, the people of the Indus Valley Civilization finally managed to adapt to the more humid and tropical areas of South Asia and migrated south, absorbing extra South Asian hunter-gatherer DNA, creating the Dravidians as we know them. The Dravidians also have some Sintashta steppes, though much less than the Indo-Aryans.
I love ayran with mint 🐫🐵🇮🇷🐪🐒
Bullshit
Heggarty et al , yang et al 2024 disapproves indo Iranians being from sintastha petrovka , adna doesnt co relates with sintastha petrovka either, ancient vedic samples lack any mlba related ancestry, this is further backed by finds pf royal chariot burials in sanauli and excavation of burzahom, both lack any steppe
Also Metspalu and moorjani et al perfectly concluded that steppe-mlba ancestry in modern indians arrived only prior to 1000 bce , which is too late to be a be a source of vedic
Mittani Aryan genome from alalakh sample in syria , doesn't has any source of steppe either , mede parthian genome lack it too ,
So i better recommend you to be updated and not misinform people by providing old sources to back your thoughts
"Ancient Vedic samples lack any MLBA-related ancestry". Rakhigarhi sites aren't ancient Vedic sites. Steppe MLBA ancestry arrived with the migration of Vedic Aryans, around 1500-1200 BCE. Implying that it arrived around 1000 BCE or later suggests a desire to portray Vedic Aryans as natives of India, which they were not. Proponents of Indigenous Aryanism are just like Sub-Saharan Africans who lived in huts contributing little to no to the development of any modern civilization until very recently but still claim that Cleopatra was black.
@@jostnamane3951 well mr. Smartass vedic languages are attested before 1000 bce , and 1000 bce date for vedic arrival is too late for anything too be true
@@jostnamane3951 rakhighari isn't vedic but sanauli and abhaypur, kalibangan and vadnagar is vedic indeed
@@boiled_fish_with_rice your point?
Carduchii☀️🦅
hey geographer, can u do research on the genetic relation between slavs & proto-aryans? it seems to me unrealistic that slavs have 0% sintashta ancestry, i mean the scythians inhabited such a large area of ukraine & southern russia for such a long time, it just seems crazy to me that ukrainians & russians have 0% sintashta ancestry, unless the eastern slavs had a cultural thing like some germanic tribes like the heruli & the rugii had where they avoided mixing with other ethnic groups.
Iranian Sailors also migrated to East Africa, such as Zanzibar, Madagascar Commors and Somalia
That explains why some East Africans show Caucasoid features.
Yous have have added gypsy as well since they bought R1a Z93 and Indo Iranian Ancestry In Europe as Well Gypsy Is Missing other wise based vidoe very informative
Basically this diagram shows:
1) Uzbeks = Yagnobo-Kazakh mix
2) Crimean Tatars = Kazakh-Osseto-Slavic mix
3) Bashkirs = FinnoUgro-Kazakh mix
Qoʻtoqdan oldingmi buni
Bro kazakh used to part with Medieval Uzbeks😂😂. We are almost same how tf we came from you. But Yagnobo-Northeast asian correct
Wow very accurate map.
ah good video i am proud of my alanic ancestry
alani were caucasia not siberia , and were just small tribes people they were part of sarmatians
@@danythrinbell1596why do you think i am siberian? i am not siberian
Im always amazed at the million different names given. It makes it appear that there's a million different races.
Tatars are classified as both Turkic and Indo-Iranian languages. In the end, who do they belong to?
😂
"Non-Indo-Iranian speakers" are marked in grey.
Turks
Chinese
Bro can you make a video on indian caste dna specifically because it might look like all indians have similar dna however many indian castes have very high steppe ancestry and some have none therefore castewise is much better represents indo iraninan dna rather than geography
Geography wise is also correct. No need to bring your casteism here. This map is mostly correct.
There would be millions of dots in the map if he try to do so 😅
@@ShiblyMartin-yp6mj That's true. That is why a column chart is correct
@@jmab721 Let me tell you the reason. Irula a lower indian caste does not have any steppe ancestry while the Iyer brahmin has one of the highest steppe ancestry in tamil nadu. The problem is that dna is in extremes not similar
@@jmab721 caste wise is more relevant. Here in Maharashtra, Chitpavan Brahmins can sometimes score 40-50% Steppe MLBA. Whereas Tribals who are mostly related to Dravidians and Austro-Asiatics score only 5-10% and 1-2% steppe MLBA respectively.
Fascinating that central Asians have higher Indo Aryan ancestry than even Persians.
Yes
It depends on what is meant by Indo Iranian ancestry. The people with the highest amount of steppe ancestry are Northern Europeans.
@@stsk1061 The first known peoples of the nomadic Aryans were the Scythians, Sarmatians and Yuezis. They are not Northern Europeans. They were Caucasian horse-drawn nomads who spread from Eastern Europe to the Mongolian steppes.
@@aliklc1970 The Aryans were just Steppe people mixed with Neolithic Europeans. This is basically the same population that exists in Northern Europe today.
@@stsk1061 No way. Unlike northern Europe, it is a mixture of eastern European steppe nomads and indigenous northern European hunter-gatherer people
Pls do on one vedic anscestry.❤
It will basically be double of whatever Sintashta ancestry one has. So a Haryanvi with 40% sintashta will be roughly 77-80% Vedic because vedic ancestry essentially means 50% sintashta & 50% IVC.
Hello from Gilan-Iran , sending my love and good wishes to all , great video btw ❤
Why do haryanvis have higher percentage than punjabis punjab plains were where aryans entered they should have higher percentage.
Haryanvis do not necessarily possess a higher Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry; rather, it is the Eastern parts of the Punjab region 🇮🇳🇵🇰 (encompassing Modern-day Haryana, Indian Punjab, Pakistani Punjab, and Himachal Pradesh) that exhibit a higher percentage of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry compared to Western Punjab 🇵🇰 (Modern-day Pakistani Punjab). The map illustrates the overlap of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry between what is represented as Punjabis (or Eastern Punjabis🇮🇳) and "Hindis" (or Haryanvis🇮🇳). My theory is that Aryans who settled in the Punjab region (especially Eastern Punjab) were less prone to mixing because of the already fertile landscape of the region and low population. Whereas Aryans who settled in Central (Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh) and Eastern parts of India (Bihar and Madhya Pradesh) were more prone to mixing because of the already high population of these regions.
@@jostnamane3951Haryana is literally the core of Vedic expansion.
Himachalis do not have high PII ancestry, they are a max of 25% PII, whereas Haryana max PII is 43%.
Hindi, Prakrit, Sanskrit all expanded from the core area of Haryana, Delhi, northwest UP so it is not surprising that the heaviest steppeMLBA is also here.
Other variables like Punjabis becoming more liberal wrt to free mixing, or being at the forefront of attacks, are also responsible why PII is slightly less in Punjab. It's a direct continuum where Pakistan Punjab is 25-30% max PII, Indian Punjab is 35% max PII, and Haryana is 43% max PII.
@@jmab721fake information , Haryana don't have high steppe just the jats and rors who are high steppe mostly stay in Haryana they have elevated steppe due to being Scythian heavy mixed , other haryanvi normal
@@jostnamane3951 Jat's were Indo Saka desendents (all Jat's were High Steppe) including North Rajasthan, haryana, West up, even two North district of Gujarat.
Do arabs
Nice video, but modern people with 20%, 30% Western Siberian hunter gatherer ancestry? I'm so sorry, but perhaps with the exception of Saami, there is no one alive with such high percentages of this ancestry.
I wonder why Mansi is then considered to have one of the highest ANE ancestry?
i.imgur.com/Rdx1whi.png
This is what Vahaduo shows:
Saami: 68.2% Erzya; 16.9% Nganassan; 15.0% KAZ_Botai.
Mansi: 30.5% Erzya; 40.8% Nganassan; 28.7% KAZ_Botai.
Ket:584_R01C01: 3.6% Erzya; 53.0% Nganassan; 43.4% KAZ_Botai.
@@The_Geographer_Maps Please search the 2023 scientific research "Ancient human DNA recovered from a Palaeolithic pendant" by Elena Essel, ..., Svante Pääbo (Nobel Prize winner) et al.
In this scientific research, they managed to extract human DNA from a Paleolithic pendant found in the Denisova cave in Siberia.
It was concluded that this DNA belonged to two women who were part of the population that became known in the scientific circles as "Ancient North Eurasians" (ANE).
Table 7.2 of the supplementary information from the same research shows the genetic affinities that these two women had with the current people of the world (the higher the value, the greater the genetic affinity):
(I sorted the values in the table in descending order)
f3-statistics
A B C f3
Pima DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.271
Pima DenPen(deam) Mbuti 0.273
Surui DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.271
Surui DenPen(deam) Mbuti 0.273
Quechua DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.27
Quechua DenPen(deam) Mbuti 0.273
.
.
.
Saami DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.263
chechens and all south and north caucasians have alanic scythian ancestry
that"s cool
Aint no way Kazakhs are on average more Indo Iranian than Indians and Iranians lol
kazaks are more chinese
Thats on genetic basic
Qazağlar Türkdür
@@حيثلاانت yeah, I know, and?
i mean come on kazakhs live in the same land sintashta formed
Indo aryans are hindu 🕉️😊❤
No , but , there religion was close to arya samajists of today
@@sahilsingh6048Vedic religipn then became brahmanism which became hinduism
@@based4560 im saying about which Sect of hinduism is most similair to vedic religion in Todays time , mostly Arya samajists and Smartism are similar and still follow very similar ideology.
so you agree Hinduism is not native to india, instead it was result of looting and colonization and genocide, that the Hinduism got formed in india by invaders
Do one for semitic ancestry
based
n imagination, dreams to be western and white man 😂
Germans were never aryans, lol
Love the Medieval 2 Total War music!
What about Mitanni? They came to the Middle East around 1700 BC.
Iranian hunter gatherer were Indo-iranian speaker from Iran not Dravidian. More likely these hunter gatherer were earliest Indo-European language speaker in India who founded Indus valley civilization. South Asian hunter gatherer ancestry were Dravidian which found in majority among Dravidian tribals (70-88%).
Proto Turks are not Iranians. The video is incorrect wtf
Knk dikkatli izle irani demiyor zaten.
@@tanhukim9963 Soy diyor. O da yanlış?
@@Secular_Turkish knk silik yazılan yazılar var, bir de koyu yazılanlar var. Silik olanlar Hint İran olmayanlar zaten, sadece onların dnasını taşıyanlardır.
@@tanhukim9963 onu anladım zaten. Ancak Proto Türklerin coğrafyası İrani coğrafyadan çok ayrıydı. Proto Türklerin taşıma olasılığı çok düşük ve yanlış
Turks originate from modern day mongolia
It's interesting to see how far these people have gone. Influencing the Mongols and the Turks in more ways then one. Invading India, the Middle East and even Eastern Europe and Korea possibly. Love to the Aryans/Indo-Iranians. ✝️❤️
I am East Persian and I got 30 percent Andronovo, balanced by my copper age ancestry.
باید 7 8 تا بچه بیاری 😂
This is just a bluff, chinese looking people wannabe Aryans?
Afghanistan Tajakistan Northern india have highest concentration of R1A1Z93 haplogroup
This is very unnacurate for pashtuns, it's as if you ignored all the pashtuns from South Central Afghanistan and kandahar and only looked at samples from Pakistani pashtuns who are heavily mixed with natives of khyber pakhtunkha
Indo aryans had entered indus valley earlier,by 1700 bc - refer to gandhara grave culture.
Can U pls make about sino Tibetan ancestry?🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Ladakhis have no Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry? Phenotypically they look mostly East Asian unlike their Dardic Kashmiri neighbours but even Mongols have some Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry but 0% for Ladakhis?
Mongols have some indo European ancestory because andronovo or some other culture migrated around Mongolia before the rise of mongols there. Ladakhis are mostly just tibetians whom indo Europeans rarely encountered thats why I think they have no aryan ancestory
@@Hindustaniyoddha089 makes sense, but then how do you explain Nepalis having comparable levels of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry to Uttarachalis and Biharis? Nepal is 30% Tibetan ethnically. Likewise, Ladakh is 51% Tibetan, 48% Indo-Aryan ethnically, and 1% other ethnicities. The similarity in Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry between Nepalis and Indians can be attributed to the fact that intermixing between Tibetans and Indo-Aryans is common in Nepal, especially in the Kathmandu region. Similarly, there would likely be some degree of Indo-Aryan influence in Ladakh and therefore among ethnic Ladakhis.
@@jostnamane3951 ladakh is very difficult place reach even more than nepal maybe thats why also nepalis are pahari people and mountains were scarcely populated by proto dravidians thats why aryans didn't intermarry also look at example of himachal pradesh where many people are fair skin and have. Caucasian features
Maybe I should have added Ladakhis. They, unlike other Tibetans, have some Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry. Apparently Ladakhis can be considered to be 30% Burusho
@@The_Geographer_Maps Hey man, can you tell me your source for the claim that Ladakhi have 30% Burusho like ancestry
Afanassievo Culture is ignored in this video. Such complex matters cannot be described just by an animated map.
Because the Afanassievo Culture didn't carry indo-iranian ancestry they were related to indo-iranians but not identical and they spoke in proto-tocharian language(they are both indo-european) only maybe in iron age and bronze they interacted each other and intermixed and tocharians in this time started to have dna from sintashta gene pool
@@Yokina-kana many Indo-Aryans carry afanassievo genetics. As an example, my steppe admixture is 22% sintashta type and 6.5% afanasievo type.
@iacko12345 The admixtures between both happened several centuries later after Afanassievo Culture with the migration of indo-iranians in tarim basin
Afanassievo was most likely Proto Tocharian. Distantly related to Indo Iranian Andronovo. Because both derived from earlier Yamnaya.
Linguistically speaking, Indo Iranian languages are Satem & Afanassievo derived Tocharian languages are Centum branch of the Indo European family.
Interesting, I heard the Achaemenid Persians only had around 5% steppe ancestry based on the few examples they had.
I haven't checked the data, but it makes sense. That general region was already quite densely populated by the time the Iranian tribes got there, probably because it was very much tied with Elam and Mesopotamia. So actual replacement was just unlikely to happen.
no that"s impossible
because today persians from that region(while they"re more mixed with elamites than ancient persians) have 18% sintashta
so ancient persians I think were more than 25% sintashta
@@user_18789 impossible. The 20-30% is not really steppe ancestry. It's steppe_mlba ancestry, which is significantly admixed with european farmers. Steppe_EMBA is the real 'steppe ancestry' and it is this kind of ancestry which northern europeans have ~50% of. Yamnaya, Afanasievo and early CWC ancestry basically.
Steppe_mlba are the Sintashta / Srubnaya / Andronovo populations. Basically 70% steppe_EMBA 30% late neolithic farmer.
The peak is with Rors and Haryana jatts who have like 30-35% steppe_mlba or 21-25% steppe_EMBA. But most South Asian Indo-Aryan speakers have significantly less than that, even the Brahmin.
Its less in Armenians, Kurds and Iranians. Armenians have like 5% steppe_EMBA ancestry, depends on individual and if they have ancestry from elsewhere, as some groups in the Caucasus have higher steppe ancestry (peaks around 35-40%) but funnily enough those groups are not Indo-European speaking.
In Iran it depends on the ethnic group but its mostly around 10-15% (EMBA), similar for Kurds. East Iranian have the highest amount of steppe_mlba of Indo-Iranians, around 40% give or take a couple percentages. Or 28% steppe_EMBA roughly.
@@Shtf132
yes I mean steppe _EMBA or sintahsta
Also just armanians have 4% steppe EMBA
but iranian have between 10_33%
steppe(sintahsta)
forexample:
kurds have 16% sintashta
Azeris 12_25%
persians 15%_33%
baluch 22%
lur 10_17%
gilak 15%
you can check it
yes it depends where region are you from
aryans❌
horse✅
Wow what a channel this is the future of archeogenetic geography
This is how I have visualised it as flows of certain peoples, very refreshing depiction, not static
Thank you for making the Haryana, Delhi region as distinct and more steppe heavy than Punjab. Otherwise people often forget about it, Hindi comes from that core region.
Also, you forgot to add Rors of Haryana, who are 40% Proto Indo Iranian, but rest of the video is fine. Great effort.
Yes also Western UP I believe is more steppe heavy than Punjab
This is fake information, highest steppe aryan ancestorry percentage is found in Nordic Europeans , original aryans looked like that not Delhi Haryana 😂
@@ashri3494 Aryan ancestry means Proto Indo Iranian ancestry, nordics don't have that. Pehle tu apna unpadd gawaarpana durr kar, fir baat kar.
@@jmab721they have it who are you fooling around jackass 😂 , closest populations to sintashta are mostly Nordic phenotype European ethnicity groups not Delhi Haryana one
@@jmab721 ganwar Dravidian , check pictures of rors they don't look anything like Dravidian. They look more like kalash chitpavan etc types in terms of phenotype 😊
Biz türküz Hint avrupalı değiliz europoid (caucasoid) ile mongolidlerin orta asya bölgesinde çiftleşmeleriyle oluştuk biz Hint Avrupalı değil Ural altaylıyız
Comment that i looking for😊😊
So, turkics from central asia are ethnically more iranian than persians? Thats crazy
If the Turks had not come, we probably would have had more iranian in central asia
persians of afghanistan and tajikistan have highest genetic of sintashta on earth
Turks are from Mongolia and aren't Netive of central Asia
@@Unknown_Soldier_2 İran'da Türk topraklarıdır
not rly, honestly i expected even more proto-aryan ancestry from kipchaks & uzbeks bc their lands were once inhabited by scythians.
The percentages are all over the place. Persians from Eastern Iran have 20-25%, Persians form the center have 20%, and Lurs and Kurds have 15-20%.
You should make native American ancestry
Archeology has not found a difference in material culture between the Cimmerians and Scythians. In Assyrian sources, the Scythians in the northeast of their empire and the Cimmerians in the northwest appear simultaneously. Herodotus’ story that the Cimmerians came to the northern Black Sea region earlier and then were replaced by the Scythians is most likely not true.
The Scythians and Sakas formed a single cultural community. At the same time, both of them could be very different ethnically. It is possible to divide them into Sakas and Scythians - this is not entirely correct.
If we also follow the division into European Scythians and Asian Saks, then the Sarmatians are definitely not the descendants of the European Scythians. They came from Central Asia from the Sako-Massogetian tribes
Karasuk culture 15-9BC -Cimmerians and Proto-Scythians. Tagar culture 8BC Early Scythians. Pontic Scythians 8BC Srubnaya culture. Saka have an additional influx of East Asian ancestors. The Sarmatians inherit exactly the old Karasuk, but not the Scythians and Saka. Sargats like Sarmatians, only an additional influx of Ugric ancestors. Descendants at the beginning left the chat and no longer went there.
Err errr uhmmmm wot about the Hittites????
Turks have got high percentages bcz they mixed with the already living indo iranins of central asia on the mother side, otherwise there were no turks in central asia.
Tocharians and iranic scyhts dominatet you tousend of years 😅
@@ChristopherTanne-se3pzyes as i say iranians>>>>... You people
Wannabe Aryan spotted
@@soumyajitsingha9614understand my comment first
@@soumyajitsingha9614abhijit chavda fan i presume😂 you are not aryan and certainly your face dont look like one !
Amazing effort! Great job
Я Алан АсТуал Ирон ❤ Приветствую всех Ариев из Алании г.Цхинвал
We Are Aryan
🇮🇷🇮🇳🇦🇫🇬🇭🇹🇯🇵🇰🇳🇵
Mannai no irans, they is pre-irans
Horse riders who lost their horses in India 😂😂😂
😂hehehe, But oldest chariot founded in Rakhigarhi 2800BCE in India oldest chariot in sintashta is 2100BCE😂😂 they ran towards Iran and india for stabilizing Sanskrit & Avesta and they gifted this to Indo-Iranian 😂and disappeared. Europian is such a jok
interesting
Mannai? Please send me articles which proves that this ancestry of Mannaeans came from same origin with Iranic people.
I wonder, what do you mean by "Indo-Iranian ancestry?" 🤔 Very much looks like adjusting genetic to desirble turkic languages map configuration in the north part.
It started in modern Kazakhstan🇰🇿
Russia actually
I thank you deeply, king.
SouthWestern Turks/ Yoruks would score %20-25 sintastha ancestry
No. %10
@@tanhukim9963 you liar bastard, Even central Turks could score %25 sintasta like in this video, how is possible yoruks have %10 sintastha ancestry
ruclips.net/video/JxMbrtK7R0g/видео.htmlsi=GGHq2UnIf3j62brw
@@FurkanArıkan-y2fBecause they mixed with the natives of the paleo Balkans and Anatolia.
@@tanhukim9963 Anatolian natives had just %3 Yamnaya ancestry and there is no real Balkan ancestry except in northwest Turks. Therefore, I didn't mention northwestern Turks.
@@FurkanArıkan-y2f O now. Okey bro 🙂👍
Kurds have around 20-25 steppe ancestry, also there was a parthian migrations into Western Iran. And the medians got parthianzied
Kurds have the most Iranic DNA even more than than Persians
@@Hj-te6mm kurds are the old iranic people , iran today got a lot of admixed populations , 70 % yemenites are iranic , saudis 30% , do you think migration , populate the country or empty from its native populations ? , remember cananites were 50% iranic
Бред
Aryans now think twice before calling Turks assimilated. They have assimilated, they don't know. Kurdish %5🤣
Kurds are largely indigenous to their lands, they are not Aryans or have any significant Aryan/Steppe DNA, they only speak an Indo-Iranian language
Kurds are iranized Assyrians Aramians by medes in fact
@coginito8365 Iranians are actually of Elamite and Kassite origin. They assimilated with Aryan immigrants coming from Central Asia. There is little Aryan influence on their genetics.
@coginito8365 it's because Modern-day Biharis are mixed with Austro-Asiatic people who came to the region even later than Aryans. Ancient people from what is now known as Bihar didn't look like that. Look at the portrayals of Chandragupta Maurya and some other ancient "Bihari" emperors and rulers. Most of them had pale-yellowish skin tone. Plus I know plenty of good-looking Biharis.
@coginito8365 every Jat I’ve seen looks like a brown punjabi though, most Aryan DNA is concentrated in the Khurasan region, north Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Tajikistan, and the Turkic central Asian countries
Bro forgot East Thrace 💀💀💀
is it possible for you to make one on the spread of indo-european genes in america next?
How is the Germanic progress going my friend?
I've just almost finished the Migration Period. There is more work to be done on colonialism. Maybe in a month map will be ready.
Will be in germanic peoples videos migration of the new world?
@@The_Geographer_Mapshow long until it gets released?
@@ganglosaxon1488you are iranian arab wanna be white western people, you were born dark skinned middle eastern, forget imagination, live real
@@The_Geographer_Mapsdon't do germanic, you are arabic, do your arab brothers kurds persians syrians
very nice video, I love these sorts of maps, nobody ever does them!
why not add russians and ukrainians? iranians used to live in much of ukraine
They are Slavic
Because the channel holder is ihnorant.
@Unknown_Iranian_Soldier1 The Slavic are one of the major Aryan group in Europe.
No iranians only lived in arabia, not in europe
@@antonival50slavian people are different race, you iranian arab, slavians are europeans
The AASI amount for pashtuns seems to be unnacurate.
I'm a karlani pashtun with Gm377 haplogroup. And in illustrativeDNA I got :
38.4% zagros
22.6% European
18.8% Anatolian
7.6% Amur river
7.2% AASI
5.4% Caucasian.
Do the Berber language brother
Can you do one on vedic anscestry pls❤
The steppe were primitive spear throwers who hid within caves due to their highly sensitive s((((s. They could never have invaded India nor gotten through the civilised IVC. The real aryans are zagrosians. Not euros.
Khamag mongols occurred on the map too early, they initially consisted of Jalair and Qiyat tribes. Tatars also chnaged their name and initially were an amalgamation of tribes. Naimans were Sekiz-Oghuz initially
Not accurate
What do you find to be inaccurate in the video? Personally, I find it hard to believe that Ladakhi people have no Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry despite being surrounded by Dardic speaking Aryan Kashmiris, even Mongols have some Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry but 0% for Ladakhis according to this video.
@jostnamane3951 That the fact is not shown! The fact that Sintashta ancestry came very late in India and probably due to elite Sakan migrations. It's becoming increasingly clear that the whole Indo-European 'western steppe origins' is a myth. Instead, Indo-European either originated in lower Caucasus or central steppe (below Urals and east of Caspian). I personally lean towards central steppe. Since the dawn of man, people have migrated from eastern and central steppe to western steppe and Europe, including the later Turks and Mongols and perhaps the Indo-Europeans themselves! The reverse was not so common and barely occurred even in the Bronze Age and Copper Age, the time Indo-Europeans speaking communities exploded. Sintashta ancestry, for example, came late into India, and only via Scythian/Sakan admixture. Indo-European languages are quite different from Caucasian languages despite the apparently large sound inventory, and also share vague similarities with Siberian and Uralic ones. In fact, the central steppe was probably occupied by old hunter Europeans and North Eurasians, as evidenced from adjacent areas, and both of those groups have significant contributions in modern Europeans and Central Asian populations, making the case stronger. Yet, the later, western steppe 'Yamnaya' ancestry is rarer and not ubiquitous as some may hold it to be. Horses were also domesticated more east than the western steppe.
It's quite explainable as Indian literature also talks about migrants to India who occupied the northwest, aka the Indus Valley and eastern Hindu Kush. They are regularly called "Mlecchas" (the "ch" here is an aspirated form of the "ch" used in English for "chocolate", otherwise written as "c" for South Asian linguistic transcription), which means foreigners, and influenced Hinduism, and its various aspects. Sakans were Iranians, and their tongues lacked some features of Indo-Aryan languages, which probably influenced the northwest Indo-Aryan languages (they lack the breathy voiced sounds, for example). In fact, Sakans penetrated continuously into India, and gave a lasting, considerable mark on most South Asian bloodlines. They are frequently found in Brahmin lineages, suggesting their elite status was retained during caste reforms in ancient India.
The video is wrong in several aspects, as the Sintashta ancestry entered much later and spread more gradually (the rate at which the color gradients shift in this vid for South Asia seems like a few men r*ped a lot of women in just a few years, which is also unlikely considering the relatively large population of the area even back then).
Well then, where did the Indo-Iranians/Aryans come from? Probably from an eastern offshoot of the Indo-Europeans in the central steppe, whose hunter European/North Eurasian ancestry gradually was diluted by pastoralist Iranian/Khorasani ancestry as they penetrated into Central Asia via the Pamir-Tianshan-Altai Mountain Corridor, and then successfully encroached upon the Oxus civilization and Indus-Saraswati civilization (IVC) lands, with very similar genetics and medium-scale elite dominance (elites patronizing their languages and culture onto those below them). More archeological excavations of post-IVC northwest India and Copper Age central steppe would shine light into these yet poorly understood population dynamics.
Note that, by 'India', I meant South Asia in general, not just the modern country.
@@king_halcyon modern-day Indians barely have any Steppe/Aryan ancestry. And why have you added Saraswati to the name of the Indus Valley Civilization?
@@ayzmalo5553 that's my point as well. Also, I added that considering Saraswati was a major river of the civilization as well. And maybe because I don’t like "Valley" in the name, so that's why. The name doesn’t matter in this context.
Turks are not considered as Aryan, they are mongolic, with high yellow Asian genes.
Have you ever seen Turks in large quantities? None of them look like Central Asian Turks, much less a Mongolian, they are mixed with Anatolians
Beautiful video highly informative 👍
Fascinating illustration of the language and people spread over the land over time. Thank you.
Oh nice. As a Persian Kurd Azeri I find this very interesting. thank you very much for your work
Persian Kurd Azeri?
@@tanhukim9963 yes I have diverse ethnicity
@@qpdb840 Azerbaijanis= Turk
@@tanhukim9963 Not Oghuz Azeri Azeri Iranian
@@qpdb840 If Azeris are Iranians, Hazaras are Turks. Does race look at DNA? Even Mongolians have more Aryan DNA than Azeris. Are they Iranian too? Also, Mongolians mostly have Turkish DNA. But we do not come out and call the Mongols Turks.
Hello, author. I have a question: Why qazaqs,kyrgyzes,altaians,bashkirs and other turkics don't have proto-mongolic ancestry, like buryats,kalmyks and khalkhas? These turkics have a lot mongolic tribes, especially qazaqs and kyrgyzes
Eyes looking like asian doesnt stand for being asian. But yeah you are right they are more NorthEast Asian but not Mongolic.
Will there be a similar video about romancers?
Yes, after the Germans.
Bro, ground evidence plz, not hypothesis !!?..
These are very wrong chronological calculations.
Saydı 22 Türk Tarixi dövləti var bunun başlığına Türkdə yazmalı idiniz 😂😂
Jats have highest steppe Aryan dna in south Asia
Yep that's their only achievement
@@based4560 they acheived lots of achievments
@@based4560😂😂😂
Rors***
4:12 только русские поймут "Yueban" 😂
Yeubana blyat?
Brother, what is the source of these last photos?
What about Croats? big mistake
0:07 I love the history of the people of the central Asia.
Can't imagine wronger display of Eurasian population explanation.
Yep and your a unicorn right?
Why does Assam only appear in 1500 when indo aryans moved there in 200?
Thank you