Especially the face and jaw. It looks like there are 2 large pieces of the jaw but the reconstruction was done based on "the desire to make a jaw with a more pronounced chin". They even admit they just made up what they wanted it to look like! There are no images that I can find of the pieces of the jaw separate from the reconstruction and nobody has even done any new analysis in over 30 years. Very suspect.
Because many people aren't comfortable with the idea that humanity should be extended so far. I'm all for it, myself. Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis x Homo Sapiens Sapiens FTW
@Sonieta03.By definition, if the child is fertile, the parents are the same species. It's only when the child is infertile that the parents are considered different species.
Old habits and assumptions biased the categorization of our species....binomial taxonomy was standard practice but many are arguing today for a trinomial classification. For example to better reflect our genus, Homo sapien sapien and thus would allow for Homo sapien neanderthalens......this would better reflect our relationship to other forms, however those that support the "out of Africa hypothesis " can not accept this because it interferes with the premise that Homo sapien left Africa and "REPLACED" all other human forms rather than interbred......Human evolution is a complicated discussion and debates will surely continue for a long time.....And not all paleoanthropologist and archaeologist support the OOA hypothesis, those who support the Multiregional hypothesis dont have a problem recognizing the genetic exchange that occurred among earlier human forms.
The video was well worth watching but the clickbait nature of the title is irritating. A fossil discovered over fifty years ago is not a “new fossil” and it did not just rewrite human history in Africa. I would have subscribed if it were not for the clickbait title.
I agree with clickbait comments. While some of the videos from this source are good, in my opinion the titles can be quite suspect and promise more than they deliver. It's a shame because some of it is good,but does take away credibility.
Ethiopia's Omo Kibish formation is part of the Omo-Turkana basin in the North of the East-African Rift, the cradle of _Paranthropus boisei, H. ergaster, H. heidelbergensis_ and, finally, of _H. sapiens_ some 250 kya, when "Mitochondrial Eve", the mother of all of us, roamed through the Omo river valley. The Omo Kibish fossils represent the geochronologically earliest _H. sapiens,_ dating 197 kya, making him a contemporary of the enigmatic _H. naledi_ in South Africa with his intelligent, yet just grapefruit-size brain of a chimpanzee that rocked the world of paleoanthropology.
What do you think of the Reconstruction of Omo 1? I think that they should use some Modern computerized 3D imaging to reconstruct it but that has never been done
@@HighlyCompelling The reconstruction of Omo 1 was first published by Chris Stringer in 1982 already, and no artistic depiction by, say, John Gurche, ever followed up. In so far you're right with the need for a printed 3-D model.
Difficult to confirm much like the reconstruction of Apidima 1. Both of these specimens likely have reconstruction flaws due to the level of fragmentation.
The only thing more impactful than "an aggressive military strategy" is "an aggressive military strategy combined with a post victory aggressive mating strategy".
It was probably an ancestor of modern Africans. But to assert that it was the ancestor of all humans is a bridge too far. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Thank you. ...and thank you for satisfying a little bug-bear of mine. No organism exists out of context, but you might be surprised how few videos of this nature include the context (environment) of their subject(s). Thank you for not doing 'the usual' by showing a stock photo of the current arid environment from which these fossils were gathered and then leaving the viewer to possibly wonder how they survived.
WELL DONE!!! The genetic evidence and Omo 1 clearly establish the Homo sapiens lineage evolved in Africa and debunks multiregional theory. It would be interesting to revisit the Apidima 1 morphology at 210 kya and contrast it with Omo at 233 kya. Was Apidima 1 fully modern or a combination of archaic attributes like Jebel Irhoud?
@@HighlyCompelling The accuracy is questionable, very much like the fragmented Apidima specimens. But Omo 1 does appear very modern... it would be interesting comparing Omo 1 and Apidima 1 since both are dated to nearly the same age...
No dna evidence. Then there's the question of what is the morphology of a modern homo sapien. Modern Europeans, Asians & sub saharan Africans living today have different morphologies. Then you have to take into account that Asians, European & Africans are different hybrid mixes of different archaic hominids.
We modern humans had better hurry our archeology of human evolution before we extinct ourselves. This is so future alien archaeologists can't up to speed quickly.
If humans lived millions of years ago, why don’t we find graveyard’s everywhere. Many more human fossil should be found of ancient man but the fact is that isn’t what we find.
Good point we’re all came from the tree of life for humans initially we can all mate or could with these so called different species that are in fact not but part of our big human family
Hahaha. Fun fact: Omo means Child in Yoruba which can also be used to mean "people of". Down south the Zulu use Ama for the same purpose. We see it in Latin too in Homo Sapien.
man left Africa went all around the globe evolved changed colours amd shapes went back 100s of thousamds of years later amd they were still bearly out the stone age how can u have the longest time in one place amd have the least makes no sense what so ever.
The "genetic studies" can consist of no more than comparison and discussion of morphology (as in the video) until technology advances. The recent DNA and protein analysis advances of the last few years have still not reached back as far as most of the remains concerned (which are unfortunately from a warm part of the world where complex chemical structures do not preserve well). So it is going to take the discovery of a lot more specimens in Africa, actual visibly complete bone structures, to 'fill in the gaps' and allow us to build up a more complete picture.
This could have been a great video and not clickbait-stop being lazy and calling old discoveries "new". More recent discoveries in North Africa have pushed back Homo sapiens to *300,000* years bp!
The skull fragments are few and very small. The whole skull is therefore an extrapolation!
Especially the face and jaw. It looks like there are 2 large pieces of the jaw but the reconstruction was done based on "the desire to make a jaw with a more pronounced chin". They even admit they just made up what they wanted it to look like! There are no images that I can find of the pieces of the jaw separate from the reconstruction and nobody has even done any new analysis in over 30 years. Very suspect.
people talk about "settled science". ain't nothing settled.
After all those genetic test done in Europe it’s settled.
We don''t even know what gravity is, or the true nature of a photon.
Amen
Yes it is, if you gave white skin your a mutation
Why are we calling different types of hominids different species if they could breed together ?
They no longer use that as a basis of speciation. There are multiple skeletal, dental, etc. criteria that have to be met
Because many people aren't comfortable with the idea that humanity should be extended so far.
I'm all for it, myself. Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis x Homo Sapiens Sapiens FTW
@Sonieta03.By definition, if the child is fertile, the parents are the same species.
It's only when the child is infertile that the parents are considered different species.
Wolves can breed with dogs, and with coyotes and jackals.
Old habits and assumptions biased the categorization of our species....binomial taxonomy was standard practice but many are arguing today for a trinomial classification. For example to better reflect our genus, Homo sapien sapien and thus would allow for Homo sapien neanderthalens......this would better reflect our relationship to other forms, however those that support the "out of Africa hypothesis " can not accept this because it interferes with the premise that Homo sapien left Africa and "REPLACED" all other human forms rather than interbred......Human evolution is a complicated discussion and debates will surely continue for a long time.....And not all paleoanthropologist and archaeologist support the OOA hypothesis, those who support the Multiregional hypothesis dont have a problem recognizing the genetic exchange that occurred among earlier human forms.
The video was well worth watching but the clickbait nature of the title is irritating. A fossil discovered over fifty years ago is not a “new fossil” and it did not just rewrite human history in Africa. I would have subscribed if it were not for the clickbait title.
The Pelvis was found a few years ago and the female attribute is new and rewrites the history of the fossil imo
Clickbait reduces credibility. For me at least.🌹j.
I agree with clickbait comments. While some of the videos from this source are good, in my opinion the titles can be quite suspect and promise more than they deliver. It's a shame because some of it is good,but does take away credibility.
It's new information to me. And thank you, very interesting.
Ethiopia's Omo Kibish formation is part of the Omo-Turkana basin in the North of the East-African Rift, the cradle of _Paranthropus boisei, H. ergaster, H. heidelbergensis_ and, finally, of _H. sapiens_ some 250 kya, when "Mitochondrial Eve", the mother of all of us, roamed through the Omo river valley. The Omo Kibish fossils represent the geochronologically earliest _H. sapiens,_ dating 197 kya, making him a contemporary of the enigmatic _H. naledi_ in South Africa with his intelligent, yet just grapefruit-size brain of a chimpanzee that rocked the world of paleoanthropology.
What do you think of the Reconstruction of Omo 1? I think that they should use some Modern computerized 3D imaging to reconstruct it but that has never been done
@@HighlyCompelling The reconstruction of Omo 1 was first published by Chris Stringer in 1982 already, and no artistic depiction by, say, John Gurche, ever followed up. In so far you're right with the need for a printed 3-D model.
@@TheTamriel one would think that errors would be likely without reconstruction of fragmented skulls
8:45 Pretty much our Australian aborigines minus the Indian mixture from the upper west since 12,000 years ago.
The image is an altered photo of a Wakaya man from central Australia. That said, I do think it's likely the first humans resembled early Australians
It would be fabulous if they could find more skeletal remains from this period.
Great research
What do you think of the Omo 1 reconstruction? Accurate or not?
Unfortunately that's not my area of expertise.
Difficult to confirm much like the reconstruction of Apidima 1. Both of these specimens likely have reconstruction flaws due to the level of fragmentation.
@@Istandby666 only no bs comment on this video, bravo honest Joe
How can it be accurate when there’s not even a complete skull, jaw or skeleton for that matter?! 😂
The only thing more impactful than "an aggressive military strategy" is "an aggressive military strategy combined with a post victory aggressive mating strategy".
You might get shot while trying
I'm going to use that quote in a future video😅
@@TheTamriel "...post victory aggressive 'patriarchal' based mating strategy"?
Got my sub. Excellent video.
Thanks for sharing 😀👍
It was probably an ancestor of modern Africans. But to assert that it was the ancestor of all humans is a bridge too far.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
And your theory??
6 feet tall and only 150 pounds but well built and muscular? Definitely a chick.
No sugar, no processed junk food, probably 5 or 6 percent body fat. I'm 5'6", male, low body fat, muscular, and weigh in at 135 lbs at 67.
@@samreh6156 adding those extra six inches add a lot of muscle mass broh
Quite long arms .. she would have been a good basketball player
Yes I'm 5ft6in and usually go from 135-150lbs.
Mankind originated on five different parts of the globe not just one place!
No.
Brilliant
Thank you.
...and thank you for satisfying a little bug-bear of mine. No organism exists out of context, but you might be surprised how few videos of this nature include the context (environment) of their subject(s). Thank you for not doing 'the usual' by showing a stock photo of the current arid environment from which these fossils were gathered and then leaving the viewer to possibly wonder how they survived.
So what group does the Sasquatch come from?
Fantasy group
Fairytales
Blurryous erectus
Look at the intellectual cowards who are afraid to admit that there is another human species living on Earth, today.
Sasquatch is most likely living Denisovans.
Excellent video! 😊
Thank you! 😃
WELL DONE!!! The genetic evidence and Omo 1 clearly establish the Homo sapiens lineage evolved in Africa and debunks multiregional theory. It would be interesting to revisit the Apidima 1 morphology at 210 kya and contrast it with Omo at 233 kya. Was Apidima 1 fully modern or a combination of archaic attributes like Jebel Irhoud?
The latter. Like Jebel Irhoud, Apidima 1 might be a late _H. heidelbergensis_ in the transition phase towards _H. sapiens._
@@TheTamriel Agreed!
What do you think about the accuracy of the Omo 1 skull reconstruction especially the face given the fragmentary nature?
@@HighlyCompelling The accuracy is questionable, very much like the fragmented Apidima specimens. But Omo 1 does appear very modern... it would be interesting comparing Omo 1 and Apidima 1 since both are dated to nearly the same age...
More "science" from the "experts". Yawn.
The video is a breakdown of the research papers so you can male your own decision
No dna evidence. Then there's the question of what is the morphology of a modern homo sapien. Modern Europeans, Asians & sub saharan Africans living today have different morphologies. Then you have to take into account that Asians, European & Africans are different hybrid mixes of different archaic hominids.
We modern humans had better hurry our archeology of human evolution before we extinct ourselves. This is so future alien archaeologists can't up to speed quickly.
"Woman"? How dare you avouch zer sex in these modern times!?
The title is wrong. The findings sketchy but intresting
Maybe used that title in the future.
So what is the new find?
The pelvis
If humans lived millions of years ago, why don’t we find graveyard’s everywhere. Many more human fossil should be found of ancient man but the fact is that isn’t what we find.
It's simply complex,give it enough time we will work the problems out.
strong thumbnail but wheres the music opener
I was wondering that too.
Decided to skip the music and just get ready to do it
Just because you share some genes with creatures does not make you a soul carrying human.
Am i the only one who sees the neanderthal resembance looking at the front of the skull
What does the Catholic Church and its derivatives have to say about this?
Why should anyone care?
Good point we’re all came from the tree of life for humans initially we can all mate or could with these so called different species that are in fact not but part of our big human family
Uh? What do you know. We are all a bunch of Omo's .
Hahaha. Fun fact: Omo means Child in Yoruba which can also be used to mean "people of". Down south the Zulu use Ama for the same purpose. We see it in Latin too in Homo Sapien.
Very interesting fakts. Thx
man left Africa went all around the globe evolved changed colours amd shapes went back 100s of thousamds of years later amd they were still bearly out the stone age how can u have the longest time in one place amd have the least makes no sense what so ever.
Ever gave yourself time to study A bit about African history?
Change in skin color is a very recent mutation. They did not change color 100k yrs ago
Because there was no reason to change to survive. It is challenges that favor mutations and not successes.
White skin is maximally 6000 yrs old, kinda like blue eyes.
@@mrbaab5932It's kind of like when you give everyone EBT cards.
Science fiction.😅 .
Archaic Modern Sapiens?
The title is always so click baity, bro. 😂 New discovery changes everything!! ReWriteS hiStory!!!
A lot of really old and dated information in this video. I would have liked to see up to date findings and conclusions.
I think the findings that the skeleton may be female is fairly interesting and the discussion of the reconstruction of the skull
😂
I give little credence to these so called discoveries.
And why is that?
Have there been genetic studies of OMO?,,,,,And what conflicting evidence do they present?......Or does everything align?
The "genetic studies" can consist of no more than comparison and discussion of morphology (as in the video) until technology advances. The recent DNA and protein analysis advances of the last few years have still not reached back as far as most of the remains concerned (which are unfortunately from a warm part of the world where complex chemical structures do not preserve well). So it is going to take the discovery of a lot more specimens in Africa, actual visibly complete bone structures, to 'fill in the gaps' and allow us to build up a more complete picture.
Since nothing can be proved its all just a bunch of egos quarreling
This could have been a great video and not clickbait-stop being lazy and calling old discoveries "new". More recent discoveries in North Africa have pushed back Homo sapiens to *300,000* years bp!
This is not a new story!
If you don't understand our past at this point you need tutoring. If you still need more information you may be delusional
BS
U mean rewrote human pre-history