The respondent accepted that he was not aware about the indian law , he hadn't mens rea , thereafter SC applied Doctrine of strick liability where held ignorantia juris non execusat but if go through section 21 of contract act ,mistake regarding foreign law is considered as an excuse because no party is supposed to know the provision and law enforced in foreign country.
Actual video regarding case starts from 1:51 ...
Thank you so much ma'am
You are one of the best mentor for me ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Happy learning 😊❤️
Thanks m aisa hi search krra kch .. finally mil gya specially du case mat h
The respondent accepted that he was not aware about the indian law , he hadn't mens rea , thereafter SC applied Doctrine of strick liability where held ignorantia juris non execusat but if go through section 21 of contract act ,mistake regarding foreign law is considered as an excuse because no party is supposed to know the provision and law enforced in foreign country.
But it is in relation to contract between parties
Super presentation with easy method
Thank you Ma'am ♥️
you are wrong. magistrate convicted him. high court acquited him
Thank you so much Ma'am
can you please provide case material
very nice 👍
Thank You So Much Ma'am.
Happy learning 😊
Thank you Mam. 😊
Happy learning 😊
Awesome video ma'am 😍😍💥
Thank you 🌟
Thanks
Hello mam how can i get these notes in pdf form? I was very easy to understand these cases
🔥🔥🔥🔥
Good 👍👍😊
thankyou mam 🙏
Please make more videos
Please provide the pdf
Thank u so much mam .much needed video ♥️
Nice maam
Are u from du law faculty?
Mam itne short me nipta diya apna atleast judges k statement to btana tha.
Ye pura case law paper me likhna hota hai?
Yes