How (and Why) We Got Our Unitarian Universalist 7 Principles | Rev. David Schwartz

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
  • For more than two centuries, the principles and purposes of our tradition have changed in their expression and remained constant at the same time. How do we articulate what we believe in a creed-less religion? Rev. David walks though 150 years of Unitarian attempts to answer that question, looking at what stayed the same, what changed, and when any of it really matters!
    Preached at the Unitarian Universalist Church of Boulder on February 12, 2023.
    Continue the conversation by exploring what it means to put "Love" at the center of our values in the Article II revisions proposal: • What Does It Mean That...
    *
    Like what you see? Subscribe to the channel: www.youtube.co...
    Much more about us at: uuchurchofboul...
    Like us on Facebook: / boulderuu
    Follow us on Instagram: / boulderuu

Комментарии • 8

  • @paigelorrabeth
    @paigelorrabeth 17 дней назад +1

    Thank you very much for this framing of the principles. I’ve been struggling with the change and I appreciate this perspective.

  • @catharsis21
    @catharsis21 4 месяца назад +3

    Bonus points for having the coolest looking vest in town.

  • @francesbrisco776
    @francesbrisco776 9 месяцев назад +3

    Uu community is wonderful

  • @rainatempest4641
    @rainatempest4641 Год назад +5

    I had no idea UU history was so full of inventors. Feeling even more proud to be a part of this community

  • @moxafoot
    @moxafoot Год назад +7

    I'm very new to the UU community. This sermon has been so incredibly helpful. Thank you!

  • @uuubeut
    @uuubeut 2 месяца назад +1

    Define sacred - define liberalism does that include transhumanism ?

    • @rogerforsberg3910
      @rogerforsberg3910 Месяц назад

      A very astute question, Mme, and one that those historical worthies who originated liberalism from the ferment of the European Enlightenment, Scottish Enlightenment & English Enlightenment, i.e., John Locke, David Ricardo, Adam Smith, J S Mill, Wm Hazlitt, F-M de Voltaire, S T Coleridge, John Bright, Richard Cobden, etc, might not have had any immediate answer for. However, Friedrich Nietzsche might have an opinion -- were he still alive.