CeramicSpeed DrivEN 99% Efficient Drive Shaft // Chain Free Bike // Eurobike 2018

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 июл 2018
  • Aiming for a practical 99% efficient drive train is the goal of Project CeramicSpeed DrivEn. This is one of the most talked about products here at Eurobike 2018. Thanks to DCRainmaker for calling me over and holding the camera as I checked out this amazing concept.... which has a little way to go. Remember to hit SUBSCRIBE to support this RUclips channel: bit.ly/3aUph9W
    Quick Facts:
    - No chain, derailleur, or jokey wheels.
    - Claimed 49% less friction than Dura-Ace drivetrain.
    - Claimed 32% less friction than CeramicSpeed UFO chain with oversized pulleys
    - Certified eye-opener when you see it in person. :)
    Please subscribe to support this RUclips channel: bit.ly/3aUph9W
    #CeramicSpeed #Eurobike #Cycling #Technology
    ­-­-­-­­--------
    Web: shanemiller.net
    Instagram: / gplama
    Strava: / strava
    Twitter: / gplama
    RUclips: / gplama
    -------------------
  • СпортСпорт

Комментарии • 4,7 тыс.

  • @thoocas
    @thoocas 6 лет назад +885

    The load will be concentrated on one or two teeth instead of being spread over 10-20 teeth.

    • @sammythekiller1079
      @sammythekiller1079 6 лет назад +70

      Xia Jiang the cranks and cassette needs to be extremely stiff and strong for it to be usable and practical

    • @stillededge
      @stillededge 6 лет назад +87

      Pretty sure the load is focused mostly on one or two teeth in a chain setup too...the chain just wraps around the others under no or minimal load? Hence the “reduction in friction” claim here?

    • @thoocas
      @thoocas 6 лет назад +87

      J Just J: pretty sure the load is supposed to be spread over all teeth in contact with the chain. This is the whole point of the shape of the teeth. As the chain wears and elongates, the tension in the chain will naturally cause the chain to move up towards the apex of the teeth and away from the base, so that the chain is still in full contact with every tooth and the load is spread. Only when you have excessive chain wear will the load be concentrated on the first few teeth. This is why an elongated chain is bad for the longevity of the drive train (this and the fact that the apex of a tooth is weaker than its base).
      Edit: BTW I suspect this is also the reason why the smallest sprocket we can have is 11-teeth -- any smaller there will be too few teeth to spread the load.

    • @leedove7255
      @leedove7255 6 лет назад +30

      Xia Jiang only if the chain and sprockets are a perfect match. Real world tolerances mean this is NEVER the case

    • @996vtwin2
      @996vtwin2 6 лет назад +5

      there is still a lot of friction due to the chain having to move through other teeth.

  • @stephanazor8898
    @stephanazor8898 6 лет назад +134

    Yeah that's 4 of my biggest concerns.
    1. Maximum power input
    2. How will the drive chain handle shock
    3. The amount of Watts lost during gear changes
    4. Upkeep, what will it take and how fragile this mechanism might be. You'll also have to deal with dirt and debris that might get caught in the mechanism. What will it take to keep this drive train mechanically sound.
    Good video. Thanks for posting.

    • @Heavywall70
      @Heavywall70 5 лет назад +2

      When you wrote “gear changes” I got to thinking the gear on the wheel could be a helical spiral type and the shaft could be lengthened by pedal force to alway be in the “right” infinitely variable ratio.
      Like a cvt maybe

    • @marianmarkovic5881
      @marianmarkovic5881 5 лет назад +1

      i tthing they could use less fancy but well tested rings from cars gearbox

    • @dzefrejzteksasu.6339
      @dzefrejzteksasu.6339 4 года назад +2

      Stupid idea.

    • @CuCulainn1
      @CuCulainn1 4 года назад +1

      Also how hard is it going to be to get the wheel off when you get a puncture.

    • @ruinadaz6695
      @ruinadaz6695 2 года назад

      as you can see its a triathlon bike it's not meant for impacts it's meant for racing on flat roads. small schock/impact can handle it since its only for racing

  • @balakrishnanprakash8552
    @balakrishnanprakash8552 5 лет назад +152

    A track sprinter will shred the hell out of that thing in his first pedal push.

    • @discbrakefan
      @discbrakefan 5 лет назад +38

      Well a track sprinter won't need gears will they...

    • @fenderstratguy
      @fenderstratguy 5 лет назад +9

      @@discbrakefan I think he means a track bike sprinter, not a runner

    • @discbrakefan
      @discbrakefan 5 лет назад +32

      @@fenderstratguy I know what he meant - track bikes don't have gears...

    • @fenderstratguy
      @fenderstratguy 5 лет назад +3

      @@discbrakefan Oh! lol

    • @bmw328igearhead
      @bmw328igearhead 3 года назад +2

      CHUNK-CHUNKCHUNKCHUNK for every power stroke.
      Very weak design.. innovative sure .. but weak. Anyone with big legs will destroy that design.

  • @gplama
    @gplama  4 года назад +40

    *NOVEMBER 2019 NOTICE*
    This video was made at a bicycle trade show in Germany in 2018. I am NOT associated with CeramicSpeed. ALL QUERIES regarding this product and its origins should be directed to the CeramicSpeed company.
    Bu video 2018'de Almanya'daki bir bisiklet fuarında yapıldı. CeramicSpeed ile ilişkili değilim. Bu ürüne ve kökenlerine ilişkin TÜM SORULAR CeramicSpeed şirketine yönlendirilmelidir.
    I am fully aware of the Turkish video from 2014.
    Abuse or unnecessary comments will be removed.

    • @refikcabuk4746
      @refikcabuk4746 4 года назад +4

      Watch this video published in 2015. Then, you will see that this chain free bike was made in turkey by Mucit Hasan
      ruclips.net/video/FDvoNXPIfJ0/видео.html

    • @carlitobenitto9283
      @carlitobenitto9283 4 года назад

      De uitvinder is een Turkse man.. Turkish guy found this out..

    • @videodamuratabileocaladdin5038
      @videodamuratabileocaladdin5038 4 года назад

      @@carlitobenitto9283 KARDEŞİM NİYE ALMANCA YAZDIN

    • @natann4474
      @natann4474 4 года назад

      @@refikcabuk4746 knk adamda onu anlatmış zaten

    • @vasokotidou3970
      @vasokotidou3970 4 года назад

      ? L

  • @aus890
    @aus890 6 лет назад +109

    That rear cassette proto is definitely going to trigger those already paranoid about spinning brake discs of death!

    • @martin.B777
      @martin.B777 6 лет назад +4

      A mincer ;)

    • @kevingiovanelli8917
      @kevingiovanelli8917 6 лет назад +7

      Those little plastic shields might be making a comeback!

    • @martin.B777
      @martin.B777 6 лет назад

      Turning the cassette around would solve that issue. Would require an offset though.

    • @Skyoneder
      @Skyoneder 6 лет назад +2

      It will be encased in a shell to get rid of the Mad Max style spinning razors ha - and so it will stay clean when going through mud etc.

    • @jonathanhowson6420
      @jonathanhowson6420 6 лет назад +1

      Ben W that was my first thought. Its a load of rubbish. Mtb 4x riders race down tracks against each other with numerous crashes. No issues with them using disc brakes

  • @Pratalax
    @Pratalax 6 лет назад +771

    Nice one for mentioning the engineering challenges no one else seems to have picked up on! Cheers!

    • @toordog1753
      @toordog1753 6 лет назад +1

      Easy work.... There aren't any major issues with this, it can all be easily built and prototyped....

    • @velimiru
      @velimiru 6 лет назад +2

      What challenges this system is like 30+ year old

    • @WOLFMAN2975
      @WOLFMAN2975 6 лет назад

      toordog How?.
      : )Tyler

    • @592sunrise
      @592sunrise 6 лет назад

      musicmetal1 wow that's an awesome explaination of this new design..!!??

    • @skys6655
      @skys6655 6 лет назад

      musicmetal1 wtf

  • @victorwasiluk8802
    @victorwasiluk8802 6 лет назад +11

    I really love the new design and the idea of having a driveshaft is really smart

  • @tthheekk
    @tthheekk 6 лет назад +6

    Wow mate 4 Million views on this and counting! Congratulations! Subs have shot up accordingly too. Well done and deserved!

    • @gplama
      @gplama  6 лет назад +1

      Cheers. I've got a video planned on hitting the RUclips lottery with this one. It was a wild ride for two weeks with this video.

  • @MattyIce2214
    @MattyIce2214 6 лет назад +329

    That’s the most advanced fidget spinner ever!

    • @duronboy2
      @duronboy2 6 лет назад +4

      And how many fidget spinners will grate carrots, too?

    • @fhlosten187
      @fhlosten187 6 лет назад +6

      It's not a fidget spinner! It's actually a prototype driveshaft for a bicycle, if you watch the video you will see!

    • @vytasffbismarck7001
      @vytasffbismarck7001 6 лет назад +1

      "a prototype" of 100 year old technology lols

    • @mateuszzimon8216
      @mateuszzimon8216 6 лет назад

      its two fidget spinners with stick replace a middle bearing transfreing rotation from cogs

    • @GewelReal
      @GewelReal 6 лет назад +2

      Damstrait As your Dad no

  • @kkehoe5
    @kkehoe5 6 лет назад +657

    This looks like a solution looking for a problem.

    • @zamboana
      @zamboana 6 лет назад +37

      The first patent for a shaft driven bicycle was issued in 1891, which... considering that the first rear wheel drive bicycle with a chain wasn’t manufactured until 1879, makes this idea almost as old as the bicycle itself. Gear driven front wheel drive bicycles are even older, having been invented well -before- chain drive, back in the days when there were probably still some real life Luddites around. Once you understand why chain drive took over the world, and shaft&gear drive did not, you’ll understand why this solution will never be better.

    • @dedfear9176
      @dedfear9176 6 лет назад +12

      necessity drives innovation. i just don't see a need for this. not to mention in the time it takes to machine that one part, an entire bicycle can be assembled. you 99% efficiency? make the motor the wheel

    • @DanielSultana
      @DanielSultana 6 лет назад +1

      DeD Fear the necessity here is to win the race

    • @brainmind4070
      @brainmind4070 6 лет назад +4

      Zack Aroo I'm genuinely interested in hearing why chain drive is better if you'd care to share.

    • @Robizzle01
      @Robizzle01 6 лет назад +10

      In races like the Tour de France, the competition is so fierce that even the smallest improvement would dramatically impact results. Multiple percent gains in efficiency would be quite dramatic. I think the best chain-based drive chains are around 96-97% efficient, so this would be a 2-3% improvement.
      On a more practical side, as a casual cyclist I’m pretty sick of dealing with slipping and derailing chains, difficulty changing gears, replacing worn/broken chains, and general cleaning and lube maintainable that chains require. If this addresses some of these issues, I’d be ecstatic, even if it had the same efficiency as a chain.
      As mentioned in the video, this is a prototype and there are many problems left to be solved before this will work, so some cautious realism is warranted. Conversely, as a non-incremental leap forward, there’s a lot of potential for further improvements to be made on top of this design if it works.
      I don’t understand where the negativity is coming from. Why specifically don’t you think folks should look for new ways to improve bicycles?

  • @lavapix
    @lavapix 6 лет назад +114

    No need for a baseball card in the spokes.

    • @thereborne5219
      @thereborne5219 3 года назад +4

      LOL or a coke can in the back

    • @waqasahmed939
      @waqasahmed939 3 года назад +3

      @@thereborne5219 We used to do that as kids except with plastic bottles instead

    • @mm-xe9oh
      @mm-xe9oh 3 года назад

      fun KNEE

  • @DarenC
    @DarenC 3 года назад +2

    Knocking on 6 million views now. Bet ya never saw that coming when you uploaded it! :D

    • @gplama
      @gplama  3 года назад

      I know! This was just another video uploaded... like the other 1100+ I have on here.... but it has gone wild.

  • @mirteoda
    @mirteoda 6 лет назад +122

    i always tahught chains were too light reliable and cheap. glad someone finally came up with a sollution

    • @timothycormier3494
      @timothycormier3494 6 лет назад +7

      mirteoda hahhhahahahahaha

    • @weazeluchiha13
      @weazeluchiha13 6 лет назад +3

      what's wrong with light reliable and cheap?

    • @weazeluchiha13
      @weazeluchiha13 6 лет назад +7

      George Alexander
      My head
      vvvvvvvvvvvvv
      your mom

    • @joevideowatcher
      @joevideowatcher 6 лет назад +5

      weazeluchiha13 only hipsters care about light reliable and cheap.

    • @weazeluchiha13
      @weazeluchiha13 6 лет назад +6

      George Alexander get some friends instead of talking to me on youtube.

  • @c.joseph7103
    @c.joseph7103 6 лет назад +39

    You're absolutely correct with every concerns you raise my thoughts exactly when I started the video, n that ticking sound I always try to get my louder n cleaner on my bike, I love it

  • @Synystr7
    @Synystr7 6 лет назад +147

    I think the holy grail would be a bike with a Continuously Variable Transmission.

    • @kagekitsune93
      @kagekitsune93 6 лет назад +13

      If they can solve the weight issue i agree.

    • @harshbarj
      @harshbarj 6 лет назад +12

      They have these, and the efficiency is very low, at under 85% under the best test. It's just not a good way to drive a bike. I myself owned one, and while the idea was neat, it never worked well. Hills that I could climb before with a 3-speed without problems I had to walk the bike up the CVT hub.

    • @siraff4461
      @siraff4461 6 лет назад +2

      I'm waiting for someone to work out that epicyclic gears in the crank mounting could replace the entire gearsets.
      That means lighter chain, only two sprockets and a more compact overall package. It would also be almost completely reliable if done properly. Downside is efficiency as the ratio's get wider. Of course if you want it could be 100% efficient in one ratio (the solid gear) then get less efficient as the ratio increases and the speed drops or vice versa.
      Would you trade a 3% efficiency loss at low speed for a 100% efficient gearset in top gear?

    • @astlerebello7984
      @astlerebello7984 6 лет назад

      Yea thats correct bro im with yaa

    • @germanborgesxrt
      @germanborgesxrt 6 лет назад

      It is done! the transmission can go forward and back with centripetal forces, and make it CVT.

  • @andyvaldez212
    @andyvaldez212 6 лет назад

    Don't know what there's so much hate. Innovation is a great thing.. is this perfect? no, but we should be rooting for whoever designed this... it looks really awesome.

  • @ropatekosa4501
    @ropatekosa4501 6 лет назад +14

    Chain ring and "cassette" would have to made out of some sort of space age material due to the very small contact points under stress, 2 or 3 teeth and possibly only 1 tooth or bearing in full contact.

    • @dippster357
      @dippster357 6 лет назад

      Hey Ropate K. Will titanium do, it's very light and very strong!

  • @MikeKleinsteuber
    @MikeKleinsteuber 6 лет назад +106

    You're right to mention the engineering challenges. Changing gear will be tough and all the load will be on a couple of aluminium 'spikes' so will have to be able to withstand enormous forces. Great idea but I doubt very much if the effort to overcome those challenges will be worth it.

    • @NJ-wb1cz
      @NJ-wb1cz 6 лет назад +7

      I'd say this idea is totally useless.
      The only reason why flimsy aluminium cogs work, is because they have very limited amount of forces applied to them.
      So bike manufacturers can make cogs super hard when compressed vertically, while mostly ignoring horizontal pressure.
      THIS idea makes that impossible, and if they want to do this - they will have to make all parts from steel, and reduce their size to save weight. And with reduction of size it becomes very vulnerable to dirt, so they also will have to seal it.
      And voila! We got ourselves a Pinion.

    • @AtomicArcherGuy
      @AtomicArcherGuy 6 лет назад +4

      They could make the cogs from softer titanium alloys probably to save on weight over steel. Cyclists love paying extra for that kind of kit, especially if the promise is to increase efficiency. Although, I’m having a hard time seeing where this system is a significant improvement over chain in terms of efficiency. I mean, if it isn’t silent, it’s gotta be losing some energy to friction, no?

    • @DustyCowdog
      @DustyCowdog 6 лет назад +2

      Mike Kleinsteuber , bear arms--- you're right. All those challenges to get a telephone, computer, TV, GPS, still camera and a video camera in a device the size of a deck of cards, completely useless. Wasting time. Can't be done. Those engineers should go back home and pick their naval lint.

    • @whataboutbob9786
      @whataboutbob9786 6 лет назад +1

      Lots of challenges to be met, with this set up, but given enough exposure, engineering minds can come up with viable solutions. One of the problems is keeping dirt out of little roller bearings.

    • @russellwalker3830
      @russellwalker3830 6 лет назад

      Nah man it will work no problem if you use adamantium

  • @danielbull6709
    @danielbull6709 6 лет назад +5

    It is definitely an interesting idea, I can see how the gear changes could work if the bearings on the driveshaft were attached to a keyed slot allowing it to slide up and down and could be controlled with some clever cable linkage. I'm not convinced it will replace the traditional chain and rear mech systems, however. My biggest concern is sideways deflection of the driveshaft and more likely the slender thickness aluminium gear-carriage which will cause the gears to skip.

    • @x2e4
      @x2e4 2 года назад

      I’m fed up with fixing my chains, this just solved all my problems

  • @goldfever4570
    @goldfever4570 6 лет назад +3

    Can you imagine the uproar in the pro peloton with the face grater rear casette there! Bloody cool tech though.

  • @RixterNow
    @RixterNow 6 лет назад +718

    That is so cool. So innovative. Since it took 15 years for roadies to get over disc brakes not slicing your limbs off, how long will it take to get over the effect of being grated up like mozzarella cheese?

    • @chrisvig123
      @chrisvig123 6 лет назад +39

      Rixter it’s the $600 pizza 🍕 gear replacement cost i would be worried about

    • @Rei89CH
      @Rei89CH 6 лет назад +50

      Roadies are a bunch of divas. Can never please them.

    • @BongED
      @BongED 6 лет назад +63

      A simple alloy or carbon plate to cover the cogs to avoid injuries...

    • @erik9108
      @erik9108 6 лет назад +28

      Are you kidding? With that much carbon, roadies will be all over it!

    • @crolson37
      @crolson37 6 лет назад +3

      1890 tech, luv bill,i voted 9thhor him

  • @CyclingSJH
    @CyclingSJH 6 лет назад +218

    Holy micrometer clearances

  • @ralphburns6659
    @ralphburns6659 4 года назад +2

    Bikes have come a long way since the old stingray days! lol

  • @hughbusby9923
    @hughbusby9923 4 года назад +22

    It’s a great shame that there is no video showing this bike being used in real life situations.

    • @joshiek7839
      @joshiek7839 4 года назад +11

      @drew13600 Prototypes are not prototypes if they cannot be tested in real life situations. In that case they are concepts. and this is a really shitty concept

    • @joshiek7839
      @joshiek7839 4 года назад +2

      @@benbktrstv6321 Calm down it was a shit idea back then too. Id hardly be claiming dibs on a shit design.

    • @kjesso
      @kjesso 4 года назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/UZcLioalnwQ/видео.html

  • @Harry-fh6gu
    @Harry-fh6gu 6 лет назад +153

    Reminds me of being down the casino the noise it makes

    • @jonmayer
      @jonmayer 6 лет назад

      Roulette anyone?

    • @lucase.7250
      @lucase.7250 6 лет назад +3

      year right, sounds super "efficient" with all that noise it makes

    • @chado3000
      @chado3000 6 лет назад +1

      Probably cost you about as much.

    • @lucase.7250
      @lucase.7250 6 лет назад

      you're right. my bad

    • @doublevanoz
      @doublevanoz 6 лет назад

      TRIGGER

  • @user-vz5bu6js4p
    @user-vz5bu6js4p 6 лет назад +216

    Chain is the holy grail of bike transmission. But it doesn't mean we should't try new things. This thing is not gonna work but it definitely looks cool.

    • @aiTheVulture
      @aiTheVulture 6 лет назад

      В 1890 появились подобные конструкции, с 1893 их серийно производили и продавали...
      130 лет прошло, а проблемы эксплуатации данной конструкции никуда не делись.

    • @HB-cg4jv
      @HB-cg4jv 6 лет назад +11

      Definetly gonna fail, they're not the first to try it. It's just the basic concept for automobile transmission the only problem is when a rock kicks in there. It'll be funny to see how this fails

    • @gur262
      @gur262 6 лет назад +5

      It works. Its a kardan. Motorcycles have it too. Bit heavier

    • @fukkinkana
      @fukkinkana 6 лет назад +1

      Hamza Bekkari any imperfection will fuck it up. They can overcome that with a casing possibly. Theirs successful driveshaft motorcycles. Not for sports use obviously.

    • @lalthanzualahauhnar4003
      @lalthanzualahauhnar4003 6 лет назад +6

      About time that something changes the chain system, chain system is well beyond 💯 years!

  • @williampennjr.4448
    @williampennjr.4448 3 года назад +9

    I dont think this is an original concept. I remember hearing that some of the early bicycles were powered this way.

  • @인문학여행
    @인문학여행 4 года назад +4

    The bicycle is the most complete machine made by man.

  • @cndsoda
    @cndsoda 6 лет назад +99

    Biggest question.... Can it still make that sweet engine noise when you wedge a soda can in the tire?

  • @MichaelHarto
    @MichaelHarto 6 лет назад +305

    The problem is that it would push the shaft outward as the torque increases and it would start skipping as it loses traction between the disc and the gear.

    • @giaxxone
      @giaxxone 6 лет назад +37

      That’s the first thing I thought. The “engineering challenge” here is that there’s no way this will ever work without adding a ton of weight and following it up with constant maintenance.

    • @srinivasnaga9372
      @srinivasnaga9372 6 лет назад +3

      Michael Harto yeah. That's what I'm thinking

    • @skiie
      @skiie 6 лет назад +14

      Thank you . I didn't know the words but you explained it perfectly. And if they wanna machine this out of aluminium they're in for alot of returns.

    • @lalthanzualahauhnar4003
      @lalthanzualahauhnar4003 6 лет назад +17

      If it works on automobile it'll work on bicycle too, remember that we are in the 21st century's

    • @stevorobo692
      @stevorobo692 6 лет назад +16

      Just incase it with a cover that can be opened.

  • @Texplainedeverythingdetailed
    @Texplainedeverythingdetailed 6 лет назад +1

    one of the coolest thing ever seen on RUclips

  • @timcoleman8964
    @timcoleman8964 6 лет назад

    Definitely thinking outside the box, WOW!!

  • @Hambini
    @Hambini 6 лет назад +534

    99% efficent, this is rubbish. Moving the direction of travel through 90 degrees twice incurs more loss than 1%, bunch of liars.

    • @gplama
      @gplama  6 лет назад +47

      In Hambini we trust. I knew you'd be interested in this one.

    • @jbkltc4469
      @jbkltc4469 6 лет назад +31

      thx man, i was really waiting for some real engineer laughing at this joke

    • @stevecrabb1
      @stevecrabb1 6 лет назад +9

      On what basis do you come to that conclusion? Total system losses including aerodynamic losses or just an idealised system?

    • @Hambini
      @Hambini 6 лет назад +109

      Having a drive that gets moved through 90 degrees creates forces on the teeth (or in this case the bearing elements) that are at an un-preferential angle, these forces are a mechanical loss. The maths behind this is here.
      www.roymech.co.uk/Useful_Tables/Drive/Gear_Efficiency.html
      Don't be fooled, this ceramicspeed setup is a crown/spur gear where one set of teeth on the spur gear have been replaced by bearings.
      The loss in tooth friction for turning the drive through 90 degrees alone is at best 1% (this is based on pure maths so the real loss will be higher). This has to be done twice 0.99x0.99=98%. The 98% is in sliding friction only.
      Then you have to subtract the loss for the friction in the driveshaft bearings, flex/torsion in the chainstay and losses associated with misalignment. There will also be a loss from flex within the "cassette".
      Furthermore as Shane rightly points out, if you wind up the power, the components are essentially flexible and will move. Go above 250W and it will creak.
      But... to the student that designed it, he/she did a good job. I feel sorry that the Ceramicspeed marketing department has put their spin on it and then engineering purists like me come along and tear a strip out of them.
      Hambini

    • @RedWingsninetyone
      @RedWingsninetyone 6 лет назад +33

      steve crabb motorcycles have 3 options for their drivetrains. Driveshaft, chain, or belt. A driveshaft requires the least maintenance, however, it is also the least efficient of the 3 and has much more power loss than the other 2.

  • @FowlersMakeryandMischief
    @FowlersMakeryandMischief 6 лет назад +30

    that is cool

    • @guruluka223
      @guruluka223 6 лет назад +2

      Hey there! Never knew you of all people were a bike enthusiast. Love your vids! And congrats on winning a whole bunch of money! Cheers! 👍

  • @bmack2000
    @bmack2000 6 лет назад

    This company already makes some components in use by some of the top pro teams in Europe and they have partnerships with several high-end manufacturers, including Specialized. This is a prototype and while not ready for prime time, it is some serious engineering.

  • @helmutbessing4288
    @helmutbessing4288 2 года назад

    Eine revolutionierende Idee - kein abspringen der Kette, kein reißen des Bowdenzuges. Genial. (•‿•)

  • @Hawlkeye-e9p
    @Hawlkeye-e9p 6 лет назад +586

    Ya pretty cool. Throw some oil sand and dirt on it and see what happens in 200 miles.

    • @palimpalim5291
      @palimpalim5291 6 лет назад +134

      Do the same with a chain ...

    • @get-the-lead-out.4593
      @get-the-lead-out.4593 6 лет назад +116

      palimpalim,
      Sure and the chain will last substantially longer

    • @mharped1443
      @mharped1443 6 лет назад +9

      engr. knows that before you know how to use youtube.

    • @palimpalim5291
      @palimpalim5291 6 лет назад +36

      Get-The-Lead-Out.45
      Why should it? Bike chains are not very durable products and they require constant care.

    • @davidashcroft5602
      @davidashcroft5602 6 лет назад +13

      Not to mention crash hard and it's fucked

  • @workwithnature
    @workwithnature 6 лет назад +238

    If you put a chain on it and a shimano gear you would be good to go.

    • @skeetermcswagger0U812
      @skeetermcswagger0U812 6 лет назад +9

      Work With Nature LOL!!!!
      BEST COMMENT ON THIS IN MY BOOK!!🚴‍♂️🚵‍♂️🚴‍♀️🚵‍♀️

    • @richarddalton5191
      @richarddalton5191 6 лет назад +4

      Work With Nature But using a chain would make it a lot less
      efficient

    • @Isegawa2001
      @Isegawa2001 6 лет назад +9

      I think you missed the point.

    • @workwithnature
      @workwithnature 6 лет назад +4

      Would love see someone stick a carrot on this. It would be at least 5% more efficient than current vitamix available!

    • @workwithnature
      @workwithnature 6 лет назад +1

      -
      Well if you want more efficiency than just an increase of 5%, it may be good to just lose weight. Make the bike lighter or just use the bike you have got.
      If this is for competition purposes than it would seem that the contestants should all get the same bike in an honest contest anyways. If this makes you 0.1 % faster than what came before than I do not see the point in that. The only point of friction you are loosing is that of the chain, it may be way smarter to focus on magnetic bearings to minimize friction.

  • @killuminatii1
    @killuminatii1 4 года назад +113

    This idea belongs to a man that lives in a poor village from Turkey. They actually stole his idea. Here is the video from 2014: ruclips.net/video/FDvoNXPIfJ0/видео.html

    • @tenj00
      @tenj00 4 года назад +3

      What looks so revolutionary is not so special really. Ofc it could be patented, if you are the inventor. Is there any patent known?

    • @videodamuratabileocaladdin5038
      @videodamuratabileocaladdin5038 4 года назад

      YES

    • @ozanozturk5399
      @ozanozturk5399 3 года назад +3

      Maalesef 1880'lerde şaftlı bisikletlerin patentleri alındı. Bahsettiğin şahsın hava gazından ibaret olduğunu anlamak için sadece ufak tefek mühendislik bilgisi edinmen yeterli sevgili dostum. Her videosunda bulunmaz hint kumaşı olduğunu dile getirmekten vazgeçmeyen birinden ötesi değil. Türkiye'de kalıp hayatımı kurmanın mantıklı olduğunu; Türkiye'den ayrılmanın bana faydadan çok zarar getireceğini düşünüyordum. Yurt dışına taşındıktan sonra ne kadar yanıldığımı daha iyi anladım. Türkiye eşittir vasatların ülkesi. Aklını kullanan da ülkede durmuyor zaten. Duran da milletin gazını almakla meşgul.

    • @frlc
      @frlc 3 года назад

      The first to invent is a Turkish man.

  • @affetvegofret9947
    @affetvegofret9947 4 года назад +82

    This machine had been found long ago and only financial support and sponsors could not be found. The inventor's name is Hasan Kum!!!

    • @emrecankara01
      @emrecankara01 4 года назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/FDvoNXPIfJ0/видео.html

    • @virjeeva
      @virjeeva 3 года назад

      @WungusBillThough I am not a mechanical engineer, I agree with your conclusion , with simple common sense it seems it is highly not practicable.

    • @paulgallagher2937
      @paulgallagher2937 3 года назад

      @@virjeeva No doubt many engineers have had this idea pass through their brain. It fails the practicality test at every level. I find it stunning that a company with enough skill to make that device also does not have enough common sense to see the failings. They should not have even shown it in that configuration. If they actually have a way to make it work, then show it.

  • @DilbertMuc
    @DilbertMuc 6 лет назад +4

    Shane, I already gave my list of engineering thoughts about this on GCN's youtube video.
    - However, as an inline speed skater I can tell you that those open bearings will become a major maintenance nightmare. They work fine when new and in the showroom. In the open they get dirty, squeaky and efficiency drops quickly. Speed skates have 16 similar bearings and they need thorough maintenance after each run. You can seal and grease them to avoid internal muc, but then they don't spin freely anymore. And yes, ceramic bearings were not different to steel bearings.
    - It would be nice to see this system shifting, and without a catastrophic gearing failure since there is zero tolerance between the contacting bearing and tooth.
    - Did you really mean that it takes 8 hours in the CNC machine to make the big mozzarella shredder in the back? So Ceramicspeed will charge USD 2000.00 per disc?

    • @sagichdirdochnicht4653
      @sagichdirdochnicht4653 2 года назад

      As for the maintainance, this is actually FANTASTIC - once it's encapsuled.
      I mean this isn't the first drivetrain for bicycles. It may be the highest engineered so far, but the Idea isn't new (at all). Those drivetrains who allready exist - altough they do not shift AFAIK - are completely closed off.
      This should lead to extremely low maintanence, since no dirt or whatever will find it's way IN there. I mean internal gear hubs are quite popular for low maintanence applications, because they are closed off as well. They'd be a maintanence and troubleshooting nightmare if they weren't as well. A little bid of sand in there and you are gonna have a REAL bad time.

  • @RileyGoss
    @RileyGoss 6 лет назад +458

    That's a pretty cool engineering feat, but there's nothing like an old trusty chain.

    • @gplama
      @gplama  6 лет назад +42

      100% with you there Riley. Until they nail this design... or something newer and more robust than this prototype/concept.

    • @DJRonnieG
      @DJRonnieG 6 лет назад +32

      A chain is only as strong as it's weakest link :p

    • @mikldude9376
      @mikldude9376 6 лет назад +10

      Riley Goss Totally agree mate , indeed cool engineering but sometimes simple engineering is the best .
      looking at that , i think it would have to have some sort of a cover or gaurd over the rear gear area , or the first time the tyre flicks up a bit of debris like a wood chip or a stone , that shiny cheese grater on the back i would imagine would go out of alignment very easily .

    • @iPTdar2I
      @iPTdar2I 6 лет назад +3

      and we got some old rusty crankplate

    • @johnnyblaze1372
      @johnnyblaze1372 6 лет назад +6

      Riley Goss thsts true in Chain we Trust😎 this seams to fragile and if somthing broke you are over.Whrere you can fix that in short Time and cost are huge to fix that.a chain you can fix everywear

  • @bongbiking2657
    @bongbiking2657 3 года назад

    Very good. Thanks for inventing this.

  • @liambrown8074
    @liambrown8074 6 лет назад

    It looks really cool, and I'm impressed that somebody actually built a driveshaft system for a bike. It's something I've wanted to implement myself, but I'm not a machinist. But I think a driveshaft system could be built using maybe 1/10 the number of discrete parts, and the result would be tough and reliable without weighing a ridiculous amount.
    EDIT: Now I'm chuckling at myself, because it turns out that this has been done numerous times in various ways. It's significant that most of the bikes we see in actual use still have chain drivetrains...

  • @johnniethepom2905
    @johnniethepom2905 6 лет назад +9

    Beautiful piece of engineering. The fact that it creates noise is indicative it may have more than 1% energy loss . Strictly speaking that is not the intended use for Roller bearings . I think it will be too expensive to produce and the rear gear system will be prone to failure ( certainly the weak link ) . It also strikes me that it must have a bias toward gear changes ie much smoother on the up than the down change or visa versa .

    • @vod3skixl454
      @vod3skixl454 5 лет назад

      Making sound doesn`t take so much energy, friction makes heat and it is much bigger problem.

  • @jbkltc4469
    @jbkltc4469 6 лет назад +68

    there's a reason why heavy industry relies on chains and belt drives for power transfer between two parallel shafts (like in your car etc.).

    • @jbkltc4469
      @jbkltc4469 6 лет назад +12

      also i highly doubt the many bearings i see in that system, which have to be properly sealed for real world use, will be more efficient than a chain

    • @lawryflynn7738
      @lawryflynn7738 6 лет назад +7

      Convert the the strongest of track sprinters putting 2200 watts + through the pedals and that doesn't even equate to 3hp. Hardly call a bicycle drivetrain heavy industry.

    • @jbkltc4469
      @jbkltc4469 6 лет назад +13

      i'd love to see some track sprinter rip this ridiculous idea apart with his legs. probably some proper roadie would do the job as well, though

    • @IUseTheOtherHand
      @IUseTheOtherHand 6 лет назад +7

      jbkltc Love to see it take more than about 200W let alone 1,500-2,000. This entire concept is laughable

    • @peglor
      @peglor 6 лет назад +3

      2200 W at bicycle rpms is a hell of a lot of torque. Power (Watts) = Torque * Angular velocity (Or force times speed if you like). A fast cadence is 120 rpm, which is 4*pi radians/second in SI units.
      Rearranging the power equations, Torque = Power / Angular Velocity = 2200 / 4*pi = 175 Nm (or 129 lbf.ft for fans of units from the dark ages), which is more than some small cars and most motorbikes can manage.
      IC engines put the torque out at a much higher speed, to make higher power outputs. If a car had to put it's power down between 60 and 120 rpm it would need much heavier, stronger components too.

  • @alienfac32
    @alienfac32 6 лет назад +7

    1899 Columbia Model 59 Shaft Drive Bicycle.

  • @robertosmitho2012
    @robertosmitho2012 5 лет назад +2

    It has to be an enclosed system so it doesn't jump out or break, like on bmw motorbikes with wide lines in the cone shaped gears parts touching eachother

  • @robiedoo00
    @robiedoo00 6 лет назад +13

    Wife says go visit.
    Lama says meh
    Ray says go visit
    Lama says how can you turn down a suggestion from Ray

  • @pope406
    @pope406 6 лет назад +70

    Nothing new - rambler cycles had that already in 1904

    • @manoo422
      @manoo422 6 лет назад +1

      ...and it was 99% mechanically efficient...?

    • @critical_mass6453
      @critical_mass6453 6 лет назад +14

      Manoo42 , no, it just doesn't work well which is why we have chains.

    • @danhenderson783
      @danhenderson783 6 лет назад +3

      1904 Pope Rambler 88

    • @sethh8892
      @sethh8892 6 лет назад

      Manoo42 I doubt it's 99% efficient... that's virtually impossible to get...

    • @sanctus722
      @sanctus722 6 лет назад

      roland H sure

  • @pocketpunkie
    @pocketpunkie 6 лет назад +57

    I really love how this host is both incredibly knowledgeable about bikes, and plays the total bumbling idiot so perfectly. It's professional level stuff. Making a video that is informative, interesting to the experts (not me) and entertaining to the novice (me. I can inflate a bike tire!) as well. This is what a quality RUclips video should look. Informative, entertaining, fun

    • @gplama
      @gplama  6 лет назад +10

      "plays the total bumbling idiot".... yeah...um... thanks...I guess? I'm confused.

    • @agapiosagapiou
      @agapiosagapiou 6 лет назад

      pocketpunkie they call it Marketing

  • @javedsunny
    @javedsunny 3 года назад +2

    that bike looks so cool and futuristic

  • @uhhhhh262
    @uhhhhh262 6 лет назад +5

    Makes me think possibly they could have a single angled gear on the rear (similar to rear diff) to take that shaft then do some clever gearing on the front mech. Would maybe give more options in terms of torque / stronger mounts etc but less gear sizing. Interesting stuff, please follow up with these guys

  • @simongorman1378
    @simongorman1378 6 лет назад +53

    That noise would drive me nuts

    • @skuzlebut82
      @skuzlebut82 6 лет назад

      Simon Gorman that and their claim to 99% efficient. It's no better than a regular bike.

    • @blanerobinson6459
      @blanerobinson6459 6 лет назад

      Yes, the noise is annoying, but where is used coming from? It's not from the drive itself, because it keeps going when the pedals and the entire drive mechanism stop. So that seems like something that's easy to solve.

    • @danbooher5843
      @danbooher5843 6 лет назад

      Ur already nuts

    • @simongorman1378
      @simongorman1378 6 лет назад

      Whats it going to be like on that big 46t or what ever it is .that’s going to have be strong to stop it jumping

    • @chrispyfer7721
      @chrispyfer7721 6 лет назад +3

      turn the volume down.

  • @nowayout8773
    @nowayout8773 2 года назад

    I was at a vintage car show and there was a vintage bicycle section and there was a shaft drive bicycle from probably the 1970s , not sure. So I googled shaft drive bicycles and it turns out they were developed in the late 1890s in Britain and they didn't catch on so the inventor went to the USA and there was some interest.
    They are very interesting. I believe the one I saw was a three speed.

  • @julianacheampong8853
    @julianacheampong8853 6 лет назад

    That bike's not the only one with a 99% efficient drive shaft 😏

  • @YukiKawaiUltimatum
    @YukiKawaiUltimatum 6 лет назад +3

    Its good for internal gear hub or single speed setups.

  • @hothothotmale
    @hothothotmale 6 лет назад +68

    Ideas to concepts are difficult.
    Have to start somewhere, and they have. Well done.

    • @gplama
      @gplama  6 лет назад +7

      Exactly. Fail fast, fail often. When something does work it just might change the world.

    • @hothothotmale
      @hothothotmale 6 лет назад +3

      Shane Miller - GPLama As with many concepts, this will generate other ideas and may produce something totally unexpected.

    • @petesmith9475
      @petesmith9475 6 лет назад +2

      to scam some money from idiots.

    • @abdullahkardas8887
      @abdullahkardas8887 4 года назад

      @@hothothotmale I hope this will inspire someone

    • @SpecialStreaming
      @SpecialStreaming 4 года назад

      They copied

  • @zheuscher
    @zheuscher 5 лет назад

    This beats turning over a heavy chain endlessly . I would buy it.

  • @markkovalcson7243
    @markkovalcson7243 6 лет назад +1

    Very nice prototype, and please keep in mind that this is a prototype and not what would be released to manufacturing. I look forward to seeing what the final production version looks like if they get that far.

  • @lawrencekeating5571
    @lawrencekeating5571 6 лет назад +57

    Engineering problems to solve?? Absolutely. But it’s this out of the box thinking that moves technology forward. Maybe it won’t be this exact design. Maybe someone else will see it and say “Heh - if I changed this or added that” and a new viable concept is born.
    I say kudos to these guys for even trying this. If nobody tried, we’d still be walking.

    • @rook-tv
      @rook-tv 6 лет назад +4

      Lawrence Keating this guy gets it!

    • @kelzuya
      @kelzuya 6 лет назад

      So many cynics

    • @NJ-wb1cz
      @NJ-wb1cz 6 лет назад +1

      Lawrence Keating, in what way does this move anything forward?
      These types of driveshafts were in use for centuries.
      The problem is, these guys replaced cog to cog interface with bits of chain and chain specific cogs. These types of cogs only work when there's just one plain, in which the chain squeezes the cog. In their variant their drive shaft will be pushing the flat cog sideways almost as hard, as it pushes it downward. Thus bending or breaking the cogs.

    • @team3383
      @team3383 6 лет назад +1

      @Lawrence Keating: I've just come along and watched and somethoing clicked in my brain and I had a "Eureka" moment: "I'll change this, add that, put it underneath the lid of a cyclindrical shaped plastic container and make a salad drying kitchen ustensil for Mum" - it'll sell like hotcakes at any fair..... Thanks mate.

    • @lawrencekeating5571
      @lawrencekeating5571 6 лет назад

      Team33 No problem. Excited for your new invention 😉👍

  • @mopar1465
    @mopar1465 6 лет назад +10

    Looks good on a bike stand, at a bike show, that's about it though.

  • @Raka71
    @Raka71 6 лет назад

    There is a lot of engineers around with a lot of mechanical background. Can't imagine what was said when carbon appeared...
    As for me, thumbs up for all the ideas coming out of the box. I am sure is doable for a real mass product.

  • @gubertog
    @gubertog 10 месяцев назад +1

    i did that design 30 years ago, what a surprise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @gplama
      @gplama  10 месяцев назад

      And you're commenting on a video that's five years old....

  • @lawmate
    @lawmate 6 лет назад +58

    Very interesting idea!
    I would have thought the gear slipping due to over-torque could be solved by putting a support roller on the wheel side of the sprocket.
    I could imagine aluminium being tough enough if the unit was covered. Cant imagine it lasting long exposed.
    Also those bearing do not have outer raceways that are designed to be rollers with an unsupported point load. They would need higher load bearings to last well i would think.
    Great idea though. There are similar transmissions for some cnc rotary tables. The benfit is that by eliminating the sliding action of spur gears you can eliminate any wear. Same would be true for this design.
    As for machine time, I'm sure if you had a custom for cutter for each of the tooth rings the machine time would be a fraction of its current time. No point in making tools like that for prototypes though

    • @user-mp9rd4hg8b
      @user-mp9rd4hg8b 6 лет назад

      What about the ability to actually switch gears? This prototype can't even do that.

    • @octaviomarquez9781
      @octaviomarquez9781 6 лет назад

      Lorro Symonds en una cnc se pueden hacer de titanio.

    • @jamesyork6512
      @jamesyork6512 6 лет назад +4

      I think that would work. Or they can run another shaft on the opposite side of the sprocket that turns opposite to the other one. Machine out both sides of the sprocket to have contact on both sides. Then tie the two shafts together ,with bearings, for support,and the bearings can act as a collar for use when switching gears wouldn’t be hard to do and would strengthen the build. Instead of the bearings on the shaft requiring horizontal force to propel the bike it would be sandwiching the sprocket in between the bearings leaving no room to skip gears.

    • @lawmate
      @lawmate 6 лет назад +2

      Double drive shaft idea sounds good if theres enough room. I guess you lose another pecentage point of efficiency and would cost more in components but could negate any slippage.
      The second drive shaft could have clearence on the wheel sprocket to reduce frictional loss there.
      You might be able to do it just with an idler bearing on the wheel side though.
      As for gear changing, i guess the designers have probably thought about this. At the very least you could change a gear one time per wheel revolution with it engaged. The drive shaft would have a spline to couple the rollers' motion to it but allow it to move between the different sprocket rings.
      I guess you could introduce a clutch on the driveshaft if this is difficult, but it would make the mechanism complicated.
      Maybe if the sprocket was tough enough you could disengage the roller away from the sprocket, shift it, then re-engage, but it would be pretty crunchy on the re-engagement i reckon.
      Look forward to seeing what the next iteration looks like.
      Still a very interesting concept

    • @RhanzChannelprojectXposed
      @RhanzChannelprojectXposed 6 лет назад

      Lorro Symonds

  • @Reeverts49
    @Reeverts49 6 лет назад +97

    Very bad, separation forces on it will have it skipping teeth like crazy. They won't be able to keep it from happening without massive reinforcement which means weight.

    • @Mrhollerr
      @Mrhollerr 6 лет назад +8

      So the Engineers at CeramicSpeed, who are all most likely highly educated and well versed in the engineering principles involved in bike design... Not one of them thought about skipping teeth?
      More to the point, this is a prototype/proof of concept... It's not finished. The designers obviously believe they can solve (or already have solved) the basic issues you can see, or they wouldn't have put it on display at the show.

    • @IUseTheOtherHand
      @IUseTheOtherHand 6 лет назад +12

      Sam The same amazing engineers who charge £1,200 for a piece of crap oversized pulley/cage set for a rear mech?
      Simple sketches and a few calculations should tell them that this is a dead end.
      The entire design is riddled with flaws. The cassette's strength is in the wrong axis for a start and would more than likely fatigue to the point of total failure within an extremely short time. The chainset's teeth being in contact one at a time would leave them bent and mangled in minutes too.

    • @Mrhollerr
      @Mrhollerr 6 лет назад +1

      The Engineers don't set the prices of the companies products. They are given a criteria to meet and design a product . If the marketing department then want to slap a £1,200 price tag on, then that's an issue to take up with marketing.
      But if muppets are buying it then why shouldn't they charge that price?

    • @Mrhollerr
      @Mrhollerr 6 лет назад +4

      Some nicely thought out points on the potential flaws, I don't disagree with you.
      My point is, why would the company show this bike at a show if it was such a poor and flawed design?
      Either;
      - They have solutions to all these flaws you've pointed out.
      - The flaws you've thought of don't exist or don't factor into the intended end use for this tech.
      - The bike is a gimick marketing stunt to generate more business.
      Considering the company tend to make products for serious cyclists, I don't think option 3 is a likely case. Unless the people in charge are muppets.

    • @seppstarthebest
      @seppstarthebest 6 лет назад +2

      like self filling water bottles
      ruclips.net/video/lYFH_bXM5gU/видео.html
      solar friggin roadways
      ruclips.net/video/O0yn-xBjb9c/видео.html
      or the juicero?
      ruclips.net/video/zpmd7renbxI/видео.html

  • @julirensch
    @julirensch 6 лет назад

    back in the 50's the Indian Bicycle dealer in Ohio had an antique Dunault with shaft drive...very slick....

  • @quickreviewchannel6931
    @quickreviewchannel6931 3 года назад +8

    If. Tiny stone gets into the moving parts I can’t imagine what damage that would cause

    • @eastkoma6215
      @eastkoma6215 3 года назад

      i think its ment for inside drive, like racing or how its called with bikes

    • @gumbassanee
      @gumbassanee 3 года назад

      @@eastkoma6215 no gears on track bikes...

  • @jbrizz99
    @jbrizz99 6 лет назад +8

    Those bearings are so tiny and all the power from the rider is going through, two or three, at best? I'm just a lazy downhiller but I bet I could still crank that to destruction.

  • @homosapiensqp3225
    @homosapiensqp3225 6 лет назад +10

    That's not a new idea, AFAIK it was in some bikes in 90's, it didn't work well tho

  • @MrRobobear
    @MrRobobear 2 года назад

    The biking world is so ahead of the game in drive train tech

    • @philperry6564
      @philperry6564 6 месяцев назад

      That 'tech' is more than a century old.

  • @cedricbottom2932
    @cedricbottom2932 5 лет назад +1

    Great little video

  • @markmangion454
    @markmangion454 6 лет назад +7

    Hi Shane, yes you brought up the very issue I first thought of, small contact area = big problem under load. I do like the idea though and thought for gear changing the wheel "cassette" could be smaller and the inside of the chainring be a similar design to the cassette, so that when the drive shaft moves forward, the drive circle at the front is reduced while the drive circle at the back is increased, lowering the gear, and when it is moved backwards, the gear is increased. the designers still have a lot of issues to "torque" about though.

  • @jlebrech
    @jlebrech 6 лет назад +59

    they could maybe make it double sided

    • @KDNPARKER
      @KDNPARKER 6 лет назад +12

      Good idea that would equalise the lateral forces, also as the front and back cogs are no longer being pulled together, as in chain drives, eliminating the chain stays would save some weight if dual driven. It will be interesting to see if they can bring it ti market.

    • @KirbyZhang
      @KirbyZhang 6 лет назад +3

      maybe a reverse hook in the teeth pattern can avoid deforming the disc. I think their real problem is shifting under load. they haven't figured out how to pattern the teeth and bearings to allow shifting yet.

    • @jlebrech
      @jlebrech 6 лет назад +1

      they shouldn't have to pattern the teeth, the mechanism could lift and drop the rollers onto the teeth.

    • @KirbyZhang
      @KirbyZhang 6 лет назад

      they were talking about some kind of electronic system, precisely syncing the engagement. sounds way harder than di2!

    • @willis23jm1
      @willis23jm1 6 лет назад

      jlebrech great idea

  • @mercytoday
    @mercytoday 5 лет назад +1

    Love it, it’s simple and all of it can be encased. Looks promising

    • @GabrieLight
      @GabrieLight 2 года назад

      That's not simple at all! Lol

  • @orppranator5230
    @orppranator5230 3 года назад +1

    Wouldn't it be easy to change the gears to toroids/torus's or something else that would effectively make it into a CVT?

  • @ScottTandoi
    @ScottTandoi 6 лет назад +92

    Aluminum will certainly not work

    • @danielszallai5294
      @danielszallai5294 6 лет назад +6

      Scott Tandoi it's a prototype

    • @HaaskaChan
      @HaaskaChan 6 лет назад +7

      americans call it aluminum... freaking special snowflakes want's to be different from rest of the world

    • @buildintotrains
      @buildintotrains 6 лет назад +5

      -T-X-M- i know. Prototypes are made of cheap materials as proof of concept. If a stronger yet affordable material is available for marketed models then it could work

    • @jonnathan780
      @jonnathan780 6 лет назад +2

      -T-X-M- Neither way of spelling it is wrong.

    • @jeffl4830
      @jeffl4830 5 лет назад +4

      7075 T-6 aluminum is used for aftermarket rear sprockets on dirt bikes. Lots of power and torque handling, and hard anodized 7075 is some hard and tough stuff.
      www.chapmoto.com/renthal-520-off-road-rear-sprocket-parent-520-rear

  • @dadinggo
    @dadinggo 6 лет назад +8

    I don’t ride bikes but very innovative 👌🏽

  • @belovedsonoftheking2449
    @belovedsonoftheking2449 5 лет назад

    The obvious solution to the "indoor vs. outdoor" question, as well as the dust/grime problem, is to encase the whole thing in an enclosure of some sort. With a retention mechanism in place, jumping out of gear would be obviated as well. It wouldn't be as elegant but it would undoubtedly work better.

  • @nasuh_won
    @nasuh_won 4 года назад +2

    I would like to see a driveshaft for the front as well

  • @dannygonzalez6548
    @dannygonzalez6548 6 лет назад +6

    Art

  • @thedude7726
    @thedude7726 6 лет назад +41

    Wait till those open bearings get dirty.

    • @jeffl4830
      @jeffl4830 5 лет назад

      It's a prototype. The bearings would have to be sealed.

    • @Metal-Possum
      @Metal-Possum 5 лет назад +2

      @@jeffl4830 Seals add drag. Drag reduces efficiency.

    • @indiansrus2
      @indiansrus2 5 лет назад +1

      Mudguards would help

  • @leamsy1969
    @leamsy1969 5 лет назад +1

    I remember our old egg beater, it works exactly like that

  • @jeraldocalma96
    @jeraldocalma96 3 года назад

    Question: Is there any adjuster to increase/decrease the speed on this gear disc plate pedal?

  • @kurtiskoppdrums
    @kurtiskoppdrums 6 лет назад +20

    Whether this ever makes production or not because of some of the hangups in physics I want one and I will ride it and not look where I'm going because I'll be busy watching it operate

    • @kurtiskoppdrums
      @kurtiskoppdrums 6 лет назад +1

      Rusty Shackleford it's ok they could reapply the mechanism to lower my casket down and cover me with worn out Schwalbe KENDA and maxxis tires lol

    • @gersonlovell70
      @gersonlovell70 6 лет назад

      Kurtis J. Kopp true

    • @garymitchell5899
      @garymitchell5899 6 лет назад

      It'd be broken or bent every other week. The tolerances are too small.

    • @trickeeau
      @trickeeau 6 лет назад

      They have tried these types of gear concepts in the automotive industry. The increase in the diameter of the cog size means more teeth to maintain the same tooth size, meaning more teeth required. This causes a misalignment of the teeth. Thus misaligned teeth between gears. Hense the invention of the clutch. This idea works but gear changes will be rough and clunky. All the best.

  • @l34052
    @l34052 6 лет назад +3

    I'm not sure if this is really viable or not but it is a very intriguing product I think.

  • @sunnyhe1644
    @sunnyhe1644 6 лет назад

    Nice job!

  • @vellingirirajaprabhu2122
    @vellingirirajaprabhu2122 6 лет назад

    The design is great, brilliant ,and simple.

  • @SergZatochka124
    @SergZatochka124 6 лет назад +6

    The technology is interesting, but not very practical. Very gentle treatment and constant service. And if you hit the moving element at speed, then everything will break at once. But the idea is amazing.

  • @dbmail545
    @dbmail545 6 лет назад +17

    Technology 😂 motorcycles with drive shafts lose about 12.5% per 90° translation. 25% loss through a double translation is typical. Chains lose way less in use, which is why all racing motorcycles use chains.

  • @douglasgordon8753
    @douglasgordon8753 6 лет назад +1

    Look forward to the final solution, looks good so far. the machining is protype. so final manufacturing will take micro seconds, they will solve it all. Great effort.

  • @freddyrosenberg9288
    @freddyrosenberg9288 5 лет назад

    I want to know how much torque the system can handle before the bearings begin to jump out and skip.

  • @thomasdavis4253
    @thomasdavis4253 6 лет назад +88

    It is definitely cool BUT for efficiency and ease or maintenance and repair, you will be hard pressed to beat a chain.

    • @MrDmadness
      @MrDmadness 6 лет назад +7

      Thomas Davis yup, chain already over 99% efficiant

    • @vurbin
      @vurbin 6 лет назад +4

      MrDmadness yeah, I’m not sure why they are saying this system is “so efficient” when the power from pedaling has to be translated to torque through a shaft first and then to the rear sprocket when Chaim allows the moment to be applied directly to the sprocket.

    • @haydenb8911
      @haydenb8911 6 лет назад

      You can’t have anything over 100% efficient. It breaks the laws of well.. everything. If you had a system of over 100% efficiency it would be a free energy thingy which doesn’t exist

    • @danmaynard5631
      @danmaynard5631 6 лет назад

      Come up with something like a belt drive on my motorcycle...

    • @JamesJLaRue
      @JamesJLaRue 6 лет назад

      Cool to finally see more than judt a video on instagram. This actually looks cool to me. Seems like, if they can address the issues mentioned, this could make its way down to the affordable end of the spectrum evebtually. Belt drive bikes need some sort of internally geared hub and those are rarely affordable if you want any real range of reduction. I like this idea because the drive shaft is at the same angle with every gear, no issues with crosschaining or in the case of a driveshaft, over bending a u-joint. Seems like having 2 shafts with the front chainwheel and rear...I guess those aren't "cogs"...the rear gear sandwiched between the 2 shafts...with both shafts connected in the same piece of metal at the end..that seems like it would create enough stiffness no keep the bearings from jumping out of the gearswould require odd spacing the get the inner shaft to the highest gear without hitting spokes though.

  • @mclovin583
    @mclovin583 6 лет назад +44

    Replacement cassette $7,000

    • @crosswire7777
      @crosswire7777 6 лет назад

      Mc Lovin WRONG!! Its only $842.67

    • @SLIMKUTT
      @SLIMKUTT 6 лет назад +2

      Now that's a bargain^^

  • @atxfireman
    @atxfireman 5 лет назад +1

    There are always critics and naysayer of new innovations. I remember when the first carbon fiber bikes came out. The die hards cited lots of reasons they were impractical and unsafe. They said, "ride safely on steel." Then when integrated shifting arrived they had lots of reasons against it. They railed against tubeless road tires. They said electronic shifting was a fad, also that it put you "out of touch" with the bike. I could go on. I purchased all of those items early on and loved them all. This innovation may work and it may not. It looks promising. I'll give it a chance if and when it comes to market.

  • @VaidyaRakeshMohan
    @VaidyaRakeshMohan 6 лет назад +1

    A unique chainless bicycle technology, best video.

  • @olivercollard8767
    @olivercollard8767 3 года назад +9

    As a pure bred mountain biker, this even makes me gasp!

  • @ArrKayCee
    @ArrKayCee 6 лет назад +189

    It's a prototype and people here are like "it's unreliable and sucks". Firstly, there's a near 0% chance you've tried this. Second, chill, let the engineers do what they do and if it doesn't work, it doesn't work.

    • @gplama
      @gplama  6 лет назад +17

      🙏🏻 Exactly

    • @AdiCherryson
      @AdiCherryson 6 лет назад +12

      Exactly BS. "Let the engineers do what they do and if it doesn't work, it doesn't work". What the f. does that suppose to mean? If they were doing their work things would work and this thing is plane stupid from the mechanical point of view.

    • @ArrKayCee
      @ArrKayCee 6 лет назад +15

      listerreg except that 99% efficiency thing is really enticing, so if they can find a way to make it work, great! If not, it isn't your money wasted, only your time watching the video and typing these comments.

    • @Jonj57
      @Jonj57 6 лет назад +14

      people said the same thing about the plane, if you live in a world where experimenting is stupid you'd be a caveman.

    • @gplama
      @gplama  6 лет назад +17

      Challenge ideas, sure. My request is to do it with respect. I make a video - My wife and I are now the subject of personal abuse (which I won't go into here). I reply "exactly" - Now I'm being called bullshit. People. Respect. I don't ask for anything more.

  • @TheCheasequah3
    @TheCheasequah3 5 лет назад

    I'd love to get one of these for my middrive 9speed ebike my only concern is at full 2500 watts could this handle it

  • @abdoharos7299
    @abdoharos7299 6 лет назад +1

    Nice job dude 😃