Unfortunately, it's got chromatic aberration, and any lens with chromatic aberration is not for me. I value my footage too much that anything that hurts it; hurts me.
@@PitlordWeedsmurph I've seen those before, correct me if I'm wrong but I've heard they don't work well with video and are so noisy that you can hear it in the video. Although if there is one that don't have those negatives, I wouldn't mind pairing it with my helios lens
@@creed3500 I’ve only used one that a guy i met had. I’ve tried it for photos and it was uncanny to see a manual vintage lens AF, but i haven’t tried video. I reckon you’re right about the noise since it was quite audible.
which look do you prefer more the Helios 44-2, or the lens baby ?
I’d say they are very similar so totally user choice!
Unfortunately, it's got chromatic aberration, and any lens with chromatic aberration is not for me. I value my footage too much that anything that hurts it; hurts me.
which lens on the beggining of video at talk part?
Sigma 18-35
@@CamVFilm Thanks 🙂
I wish a lens like this would have autofocus
You should check the manual lens autofocus adapter that moves the lens back and forth in order to AF on a modern camera.
@@PitlordWeedsmurph I've seen those before, correct me if I'm wrong but I've heard they don't work well with video and are so noisy that you can hear it in the video. Although if there is one that don't have those negatives, I wouldn't mind pairing it with my helios lens
@@creed3500 I’ve only used one that a guy i met had. I’ve tried it for photos and it was uncanny to see a manual vintage lens AF, but i haven’t tried video. I reckon you’re right about the noise since it was quite audible.