LMs are still way to expensive for normal people. Requiring a subscription to keep a device working should also be illegal. Requiring a subscription to allow device to work with 3rd party software should be illegal.
I believe the RCT balls help with radar based monitors because of the limited space to read the shot. Not needed outdoors at a range because it has a much longer path to read the stats. In my opinion this shouldn’t be a deterrent
If you are at the range and use range balls, MLM2P tracks the ball using its radar and gives you accurate distance numbers, shot shape, etc. The visuals are in my opinion are a good replacement for measured spin rates...
Crazy advice…. I played mlm2 all winter, hit the course this spring and my numbers and shot shapes are pretty damn spot on. I think you would be better to buy mlm2 and then take a handful of lessons on trackman with a coach for the money.
Golf is fun! That’s why we play, are you a pro? Is this your livelihood? Then yes, fine, spend over 2k. If you’re an amateur than this is perfectly fine.
Interesting that in tests with no editing the $700 one is 10-15% off with carry distance BOTH WAYS and you can assume with it its even more off with other stuff...go check some videos
10% on a 200 yard shot is 20 yards, you’re telling me any launch monitor on the market has a deviation of 40 yards on a 200 yard shot? Like the same shots will read 180 and then 220?
Unless this short video was edited, the carry distance between Rapsodo and GCQuad on the lob wedge is 1.1y, 7i is 1.3y and driver is 2y. The spin rates were spot on. I would say you cant get anymore accurate than this. If you put two GCQuad together and have the same shots, the numbers will differ.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
LMs are still way to expensive for normal people. Requiring a subscription to keep a device working should also be illegal. Requiring a subscription to allow device to work with 3rd party software should be illegal.
Then the device wouldn’t be affordable. Pick your poison, spread the cost out over years or pay a large sum up front.
I agree but I’m pretty sure the only thing in the subscription is spin numbers. I just got one so I’m curious.
@@MrDill32 having fun with it?
Woah, the spin axis is very different. This is very concerning. Question is, which one's wrong?
The foresight is more accurate which is a reason its $7k
It's only 0.2 degrees
I have the MOM2Pro. It’s not accurate and misses a lot is shots.
Go watch more videos of non sponsored golfers, who didn't get it and few thousand K to make fee videos..this thing is way off
Missed one on about 500 of my swings so excellent to me. @Co-Monad
Thanks for this! I just wish mlm2pro had AOA. Do you think having AOA is critical for game improvement though?
Yeah... That would so nice
Why do you need an angle of an attack?
Is that truly going to help your golf game?
@@chezchezchezchez i dont know, that's why i'd like to have that data to find out.
The only thing drawing me away from the MLM2 is having to use specific balls for spin rate. If I’m at an outdoor range I can’t use them
I believe the RCT balls help with radar based monitors because of the limited space to read the shot. Not needed outdoors at a range because it has a much longer path to read the stats. In my opinion this shouldn’t be a deterrent
If you are at the range and use range balls, MLM2P tracks the ball using its radar and gives you accurate distance numbers, shot shape, etc. The visuals are in my opinion are a good replacement for measured spin rates...
What I don’t understand is with a swing like that why ok earth would you even invest in a 7k one??… all the gear but no idea
I guess if you’re gonna swing that light, any launch monitor will do
Huh? U want to swing light to have a control swing watch tom watson the club he doesnt have a aggressive seing
So easy to cherry pick data and make the 700 like like 7000. Show 10 shots of each
Get the blp, don’t waste your money on anything under 2k unless you playing just for fun.
Crazy advice…. I played mlm2 all winter, hit the course this spring and my numbers and shot shapes are pretty damn spot on. I think you would be better to buy mlm2 and then take a handful of lessons on trackman with a coach for the money.
Golf is fun! That’s why we play, are you a pro? Is this your livelihood? Then yes, fine, spend over 2k. If you’re an amateur than this is perfectly fine.
Interesting that in tests with no editing the $700 one is 10-15% off with carry distance BOTH WAYS and you can assume with it its even more off with other stuff...go check some videos
Where the hell u getting 10-15%?
10% on a 200 yard shot is 20 yards, you’re telling me any launch monitor on the market has a deviation of 40 yards on a 200 yard shot? Like the same shots will read 180 and then 220?
The biggest deviation is on the wedge and it's like 3 yards. For some dumb reason the carry number is at the bottom in the second shot.
Unless this short video was edited, the carry distance between Rapsodo and GCQuad on the lob wedge is 1.1y, 7i is 1.3y and driver is 2y. The spin rates were spot on. I would say you cant get anymore accurate than this. If you put two GCQuad together and have the same shots, the numbers will differ.
Not 700$ … 700$+200$+200+200$+…. It adds up. Also no club data???
Yeah it’s worth purchasing something around 800-1000 with no subscription fee