Manim is such a powerful library, it's surprisingly amazing how many incredible animations you can do with a few lines of code. Maybe, combining it with AE would show some new horizons. Really nice video and comparation.
I remember trying to pick up Manim years ago and you were the only resource I could find teaching it... nice job sticking with it and creating a skill set! :D There's like a 70% chance I'll get the course at some point
Actually, also in Geogebra you can define objects as parameters. The most important different between the two softwares is the editor and the Geogebra one is much less comfortable than Manim one. But you realize that only if you have to write software with hundreds of variables or objects, and with thousands of line. Moreover in Geogebra, if the code lines are made of long sequences of characters, you cannot watch the entire single instruction because it is impossible to adjust the width of the windows you are typing in. And I can go on making many examples to show you how the Geogebra editor make you go crazy dealing with big codes. If you only show little codes, you cannot find significant differences between the two software. I love Geogebra, but I hate it at the same time. The quality of 2D and 3D graphics is excellent. I try to explain my tips on Geogebra blog, to let them to improve the quality of the editor and other topics, but they only misunderstood me.
I just started using Manim today. Couldn't have been simpler and I was able to achieve something I had not seen replicated elsewhere. And be because it's python, as said by the video, I now have the beginnings of a time series data animation library. One problem however is that it is not exactly perfectly suited to my task of working with real data. Plotting prefers lamdba functions, while I am working with rows and columns (dataframes). That being said it will certainly both prettify my presentations, and the utility of using animation awards a time-dimension to data visualisation, so concepts are more easily articulated also.
Manim is a powerful library, but I really hope that the author of FFmpeg and Cairo can make a parallel version of their library and, if possible, support rendering with an NVidia GPU.
adobe after effects has coding integration with py language features. hence using that will a speed up the process, and b also add the level of flexibility that u want...
I think you didn't see the full video, yes, AF you can use JS to program, but AF only makes animations and basic figures, for more complex things you have to use Illustrator or Photoshop, That is, you are limited to what your Illustrator files have, and that makes it cumbersome to use on some things. For many animations it is easier to use Manim, in other AF, it depends on the animation
Hello friend, I'm currently enrolled to your course (Chapter2) and although I'm so very pleased with Manim and your lessons so far; I am kind of startled with the fact that, for my kind of "modest" PC, rendering 10 RelativePosition Animations for 2 Mobjects, while using JUPYTER takes around 12 seconds. I know, it is not such a big deal but, needless to say, that, looking forward on making a 10 min animation...that might take quite a bit to render....Right? So I have 2 questions, hope you can help me out with them. 1.- What would be the disadvantages or limitations for rendering animation through GoogleColab? 2.-Does rendering through Jupyter Notebook slows down the process as opposed to rendering through the Terminal (or CMD)? Thank you very much for all of your effort in spreading high quality practical knowledge!
1) the problem is that it is slower, and if your animation is complex it will be very cumbersome to work with, use GC just to learn. 2) Jupyter uses extra resources from your PC, if it is low on resources I recommend you use the terminal. I also recommend using a low-end editor, like neovim, so your computer can Use all their power in the rendering
An average PC nowadays have 4-8 CPUs, but manim can only use 1, this means it can only use 1/4 or 1/8 of the full power of your CPU, and it does not support GPU. One way to work around it is to write 8 scripts, each script renders 1/8 of your video, you run these scripts simutaneously and combine them together using e.g. ffmpeg or adobe premiere pro.
@@HanwenJin Well THANK YOU! for taking the time to write down all of these information. Certainly your suggestion of writing 8 scripts Is useful. Probably a whole game-changer. Thank you
Buena suerte creando una animación con degradado radial sobre la que unos enanitos alienígenas disparan rayos laser por los ojos. Bromas aparte, Manim es muy potente para ciertas cosas y After Effects para otras. Yo los estoy usando combinados para hacer un videos de divulgación de química y, sinceramente, no habría sido posible sin tus tutoriales. ¡Muchísimas gracias por todo y espero que vendas muchos cursos! En cuanto tenga dinero suficiente pienso comprarlo aunque se haya caducado el cupón
I don't want to hate manim or something, but it has a lot of problems with stability. I made a number of animations by manim and I know what I am talking about. I don't know what exactly is wrong, but you constantly meet some problems. And what is connected with this video btw: try to do the same with function f(x) = 1/x (P/S: you will get weird and strange results even if you add discontinuities=[0] in ParametricFunction args)
Although it is true that for certain things Manim is difficult, your example is not very problematic, you just need to create two graphs, or the graphs that are necessary separating the discontinuities.
manim - use math to create math animation... after effects - not use math to create math animation... if you are creating math animations you probably enjoy math... so manim is the clear winner.
Yes, you can change the background color, even export the video with "alpha channel" transparency. And yes, you can pass the video to Adobe if you want, either as an MP4 file, .mov (alpha channel) or images.
@@TheoremofBeethoven Thanks. Also, where did you get the geogebra video from? are you following what someone else did (geogebra + after effects)? That was not clear to me.
Man, I'm pretty good at CGI and I tried making math videos in AE, and... long story short it sucks. Does it look technically good? Sure. It does. Cuz I'm good. But was it easy or seamless like programming? Hell, no! I haven't even tried Manim yet, but if it's anything close to, say, POV-Ray's scripting ability, then it's better by default.
@@TheoremofBeethoven For me, it says "AttributeError: 'NumberPlane' object has no attribute 'plot'. Did you mean: 'split'?" although I put "left_plot = axes.plot(func, x_range=[X_MIN_RANGE,0])" just like you did.
las animaciones de manim parecían muy bonitas en un principio pero ahora como que cansan, en todas los videos de matemática. similar a lo que pasó con Prezi hace varios años atrás.
Y eso qué? No es como si alguien te obligaran a ver videos del estilo. Si te cansan es porque tú eres el que los busca. Además, no todos tienen el buen gusto y habilidades para hacer buenas presentaciones, si te parecen aburridas/malas no es culpa de Manim, sino del poco talento o esfuerzo de quienes las hacen.
![KSI - Thick Of It (feat. Trippie Redd) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/At8v_Yc044Y/mqdefault.jpg)
Manim is such a powerful library, it's surprisingly amazing how many incredible animations you can do with a few lines of code. Maybe, combining it with AE would show some new horizons. Really nice video and comparation.
Louro José
I remember trying to pick up Manim years ago and you were the only resource I could find teaching it... nice job sticking with it and creating a skill set! :D There's like a 70% chance I'll get the course at some point
I've been looking for this stuff for 10 years. That's absolutely insane!
Great job explaining the advantages. Creating variations is far easier in manim.
Actually, also in Geogebra you can define objects as parameters.
The most important different between the two softwares is the editor and the Geogebra one is much less comfortable than Manim one. But you realize that only if you have to write software with hundreds of variables or objects, and with thousands of line. Moreover in Geogebra, if the code lines are made of long sequences of characters, you cannot watch the entire single instruction because it is impossible to adjust the width of the windows you are typing in.
And I can go on making many examples to show you how the Geogebra editor make you go crazy dealing with big codes.
If you only show little codes, you cannot find significant differences between the two software.
I love Geogebra, but I hate it at the same time.
The quality of 2D and 3D graphics is excellent.
I try to explain my tips on Geogebra blog, to let them to improve the quality of the editor and other topics, but they only misunderstood me.
I just started using Manim today. Couldn't have been simpler and I was able to achieve something I had not seen replicated elsewhere. And be because it's python, as said by the video, I now have the beginnings of a time series data animation library.
One problem however is that it is not exactly perfectly suited to my task of working with real data. Plotting prefers lamdba functions, while I am working with rows and columns (dataframes).
That being said it will certainly both prettify my presentations, and the utility of using animation awards a time-dimension to data visualisation, so concepts are more easily articulated also.
very interesting content and straight-forward presentation. much love from hk.
Great course!! Congrats!! When you will release the intermediate and the advanced one? I will buy for sure!!
Excelente. Excelente.
Espero inscribirme pronto en tu curso.
Saludos y muchisimas gracias.
Loved your Buckethead playlist, and I will enroll to the course, thanks.
I spend 5 hours in manim to do this
Manim is a powerful library, but I really hope that the author of FFmpeg and Cairo can make a parallel version of their library and, if possible, support rendering with an NVidia GPU.
Please help me I am having a tough time installing manim.
adobe after effects has coding integration with py language features. hence using that will a speed up the process, and b also add the level of flexibility that u want...
I think you didn't see the full video, yes, AF you can use JS to program, but AF only makes animations and basic figures, for more complex things you have to use Illustrator or Photoshop, That is, you are limited to what your Illustrator files have, and that makes it cumbersome to use on some things. For many animations it is easier to use Manim, in other AF, it depends on the animation
just like word and LaTeX😂
Hello friend, I'm currently enrolled to your course (Chapter2) and although I'm so very pleased with Manim and your lessons so far; I am kind of startled with the fact that, for my kind of "modest" PC, rendering 10 RelativePosition Animations for 2 Mobjects, while using JUPYTER takes around 12 seconds. I know, it is not such a big deal but, needless to say, that, looking forward on making a 10 min animation...that might take quite a bit to render....Right?
So I have 2 questions, hope you can help me out with them.
1.- What would be the disadvantages or limitations for rendering animation through GoogleColab?
2.-Does rendering through Jupyter Notebook slows down the process as opposed to rendering through the Terminal (or CMD)?
Thank you very much for all of your effort in spreading high quality practical knowledge!
1) the problem is that it is slower, and if your animation is complex it will be very cumbersome to work with, use GC just to learn.
2) Jupyter uses extra resources from your PC, if it is low on resources I recommend you use the terminal. I also recommend using a low-end editor, like neovim, so your computer can Use all their power in the rendering
The reason why manim is slow is because it uses SINGLE core and only supports OpenGL. And you cannot take advantage of the GPU in google colab.
An average PC nowadays have 4-8 CPUs, but manim can only use 1, this means it can only use 1/4 or 1/8 of the full power of your CPU, and it does not support GPU. One way to work around it is to write 8 scripts, each script renders 1/8 of your video, you run these scripts simutaneously and combine them together using e.g. ffmpeg or adobe premiere pro.
@@HanwenJin Well THANK YOU! for taking the time to write down all of these information. Certainly your suggestion of writing 8 scripts Is useful. Probably a whole game-changer. Thank you
Buena suerte creando una animación con degradado radial sobre la que unos enanitos alienígenas disparan rayos laser por los ojos.
Bromas aparte, Manim es muy potente para ciertas cosas y After Effects para otras. Yo los estoy usando combinados para hacer un videos de divulgación de química y, sinceramente, no habría sido posible sin tus tutoriales.
¡Muchísimas gracias por todo y espero que vendas muchos cursos! En cuanto tenga dinero suficiente pienso comprarlo aunque se haya caducado el cupón
I don't want to hate manim or something, but it has a lot of problems with stability.
I made a number of animations by manim and I know what I am talking about. I don't know what exactly is wrong, but you constantly meet some problems.
And what is connected with this video btw: try to do the same with function f(x) = 1/x (P/S: you will get weird and strange results even if you add discontinuities=[0] in ParametricFunction args)
Although it is true that for certain things Manim is difficult, your example is not very problematic, you just need to create two graphs, or the graphs that are necessary separating the discontinuities.
manim - use math to create math animation...
after effects - not use math to create math animation...
if you are creating math animations you probably enjoy math... so manim is the clear winner.
This is an amazing tool.
Does Manim only produce videos with a black background? Is there a way to export the animation to after effects to add more stuff to the video?
Yes, you can change the background color, even export the video with "alpha channel" transparency. And yes, you can pass the video to Adobe if you want, either as an MP4 file, .mov (alpha channel) or images.
@@TheoremofBeethoven Thanks. Also, where did you get the geogebra video from? are you following what someone else did (geogebra + after effects)? That was not clear to me.
Man, I'm pretty good at CGI and I tried making math videos in AE, and... long story short it sucks. Does it look technically good? Sure. It does. Cuz I'm good. But was it easy or seamless like programming? Hell, no! I haven't even tried Manim yet, but if it's anything close to, say, POV-Ray's scripting ability, then it's better by default.
The first thing is a great Manim install video. I just sent you an email.
I don't think I got your email.
Upload the course to udemy, please
Which vs code font and theme is that?
Gracias
Which manim version did you use?
I don't remember, but the code still works for the current version.
@@TheoremofBeethoven For me, it says "AttributeError: 'NumberPlane' object has no attribute 'plot'. Did you mean: 'split'?" although I put "left_plot = axes.plot(func, x_range=[X_MIN_RANGE,0])" just like you did.
Is this module sufficient for researchers?
No, Manim is not suitable for complex simulations, see this video:
ruclips.net/video/EONHtYkfCds/видео.html
@@TheoremofBeethoven then should I learn blender for python? Is there an "all in one" library which is suitable for researchers?
@@epictetus__ No, it depends on what you want to do, Manim is used to teach, Blender for 3D.
There are no magic libraries to do everything.
las animaciones de manim parecían muy bonitas en un principio pero ahora como que cansan, en todas los videos de matemática. similar a lo que pasó con Prezi hace varios años atrás.
Y eso qué? No es como si alguien te obligaran a ver videos del estilo. Si te cansan es porque tú eres el que los busca. Además, no todos tienen el buen gusto y habilidades para hacer buenas presentaciones, si te parecen aburridas/malas no es culpa de Manim, sino del poco talento o esfuerzo de quienes las hacen.
@@TheoremofBeethoven. cansan y en breve van pasar de moda.
@@pochotom2834 lo que tú digas crack