I'd like to see a mock trial based on the information in the Aimed At America 1 and the Aimed At America 3 video. There are too many parallels for an impartial juror to rule that America does not fit the description of the prime suspect described in the Bible.
The system/structure of Grand Juries is the purest garbage. The purpose of a grand Jury was originally created for two reasons: 1. To protect the accused from public exploitation and destruction of life and liberty prior to a legitimate accusation through an indictment, with notification of accusation with legal promise that all evidence is fact, achieved legally, and is truth. 2. To prevent the fleeing, and destruction of evidence by the accused prior to arrest. The entire judicial system wrongfully keeps the Grand Jury Separate from the trial. There are no transcripts taken. There is no defensive representation allowed for the accused. EVERYONE knows the stupid saying in absolute accepted conformity concerning Grand Juries...Prosecutors can indict a "Ham sandwich" through a grand jury by being a purely one sided presentation that has absolutely no factual affirmation as to all evidence...people lie, police can legally lie by lying, manipulation, threats, etc., are all investigatory tactics, prosecutors can lie by being silent to exculpatory, witnesses can lie...Only the worst prosecutor on earth could loose in a grand jury setting. The only equal remedy to both sides is that if a person is indicted, that the exact same panel of jurists that indicted, is the exact same jury for the trial. This provides remedy that the actual evidence of facts that were presented to them in the grand jury is the same as what is presented to them in the actual trial. if it is found that evidence is missing in trial due to falsely created theory, illegal evidence, etc...Being the same jury would allow them to weigh the changes as to what was presented in promise during the grand jury and whether they would have voted to indicted in the first place. A speedy trial rarely takes place and where that waiver is rejected by a defendant and wants that speedy trial...That lawyer is frowned upon and over ruled...exposing the fact that prosecution is not prepared and creates suspicion because if in fact they claimed complete preparation to the evidence to the grand jury they should have been already prepared for trial. The Grand Jury would then be able to correct a life destroying decision against an accused person and allow for a clean conscious as to their vote.
Nick, you are the man! You make us proud.
Matt
I'd like to see a mock trial based on the information in the Aimed At America 1 and the Aimed At America 3 video. There are too many parallels for an impartial juror to rule that America does not fit the description of the prime suspect described in the Bible.
Great argument but ultimately the points that Ibrahim and Moran did were superior. Well received however.
what kind of case is this? i am not knowledgeable of american law
Good enough.
so...I'm going to law school and I am not looking forward to be torn to shreds like the second guy did :)
moot?
Best oralist 37:14
The system/structure of Grand Juries is the purest garbage. The purpose of a grand Jury was originally created for two reasons:
1. To protect the accused from public exploitation and destruction of life and liberty prior to a legitimate accusation through an indictment, with notification of accusation with legal promise that all evidence is fact, achieved legally, and is truth.
2. To prevent the fleeing, and destruction of evidence by the accused prior to arrest.
The entire judicial system wrongfully keeps the Grand Jury Separate from the trial. There are no transcripts taken. There is no defensive representation allowed for the accused. EVERYONE knows the stupid saying in absolute accepted conformity concerning Grand Juries...Prosecutors can indict a "Ham sandwich" through a grand jury by being a purely one sided presentation that has absolutely no factual affirmation as to all evidence...people lie, police can legally lie by lying, manipulation, threats, etc., are all investigatory tactics, prosecutors can lie by being silent to exculpatory, witnesses can lie...Only the worst prosecutor on earth could loose in a grand jury setting.
The only equal remedy to both sides is that if a person is indicted, that the exact same panel of jurists that indicted, is the exact same jury for the trial. This provides remedy that the actual evidence of facts that were presented to them in the grand jury is the same as what is presented to them in the actual trial. if it is found that evidence is missing in trial due to falsely created theory, illegal evidence, etc...Being the same jury would allow them to weigh the changes as to what was presented in promise during the grand jury and whether they would have voted to indicted in the first place.
A speedy trial rarely takes place and where that waiver is rejected by a defendant and wants that speedy trial...That lawyer is frowned upon and over ruled...exposing the fact that prosecution is not prepared and creates suspicion because if in fact they claimed complete preparation to the evidence to the grand jury they should have been already prepared for trial. The Grand Jury would then be able to correct a life destroying decision against an accused person and allow for a clean conscious as to their vote.
W.Uguanda gulag , likes takis. COVID19-INÉ.😅😅😅😅😅.