The Supersonic Flying Beast That Totally Changed Aviation

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024

Комментарии • 117

  • @MERKAMGCLK
    @MERKAMGCLK Месяц назад +17

    I had the GREATEST HONOR to have met both Chuck Yeager and Scott Crossfield. What amazing pilots and heros of aviation.

    • @TurboNFRStwoK
      @TurboNFRStwoK 24 дня назад +2

      I met Chuck Yeager when I was 13 at a Young Aviators of America gathering. At the time I didn’t REALLY know who he was. It wasn’t until a few years later that I realized how awesome it was that I got to meet him in person.

  • @isucyclonenick05
    @isucyclonenick05 25 дней назад +5

    When I was a young Lt in the Air Force I had the honor of meeting Scott Crossfield at Maxwell AFB in AL. As he departed that day in his own private aircraft to fly home, he hit a thunderstorm in GA and crashed. RIP Scott. I’m better for having met you.

  • @marko11kram
    @marko11kram Месяц назад +9

    The more you know about Neil Armstrong, the more amazing it is

  • @harrybalsak916
    @harrybalsak916 Месяц назад +48

    What is truly amazing about all these aircraft is that they were designed from start to finish using slide rules.

    • @johnbrobston1334
      @johnbrobston1334 Месяц назад +5

      And a lot of expensive and somewhat limited wind tunnel and structural tests that can now be conducted via computational fluid dynamics and finite element analysis.

    • @dougcastleman9518
      @dougcastleman9518 Месяц назад +1

      As well as spacecraft.

    • @skyedog24
      @skyedog24 Месяц назад +3

      Don't forget pocket protectors. Pocket protectors and slide rules got us to the moon.🤓

    • @hagerty1952
      @hagerty1952 Месяц назад +2

      Not entirely. There were also Frieden mechanical calculators to do the simple repetitive stuff. By the mid '50s, the period this video covers, there were plenty of IBM, Honeywell and Burroughs mainframes around. Using them was pretty awkward, though.

    • @johnbrobston1334
      @johnbrobston1334 Месяц назад +2

      @@hagerty1952 And even in the early '40s quite a lot could be done with a room full of punch-card machines. Feynman mentions these being in use during the Manhattan Project--at one point somebody wanted the punch card crew to stop what they were doing and immediately run his calculation--the high school kid who was bossing that operation stood up to him and made it stick--apparently they had multiple calculations going simultaneously and they would have had to stop more than one other calculation to give his priority.

  • @johnathandavis3693
    @johnathandavis3693 Месяц назад +25

    25 yrs. ago, I was working at Edwards AFB and they had a Bell X-1 on static display and a couple others, I think one of these in a fenced area. With my bright green "contractor" pass, I was able to go back in the fenced area and touch all the aircraft, including the Lunar Module trainer vehicle that the Apollo astronauts trained-on. Couldn't have cameras though. That would have gotten me thrown off the base, and probably fired by the phone company. It's harder to get on that base now, if you don't have business there.

    • @dothatwattentwat
      @dothatwattentwat Месяц назад

      lies...............all lies!..................your full of lies!

    • @Istandby666
      @Istandby666 Месяц назад

      If you're a civilian, the best time to go is during an Air Show.

    • @Istandby666
      @Istandby666 Месяц назад

      If you're a civilian, the best time to go is during an Air Show.

    • @hud86
      @hud86 Месяц назад

      I went to a community college that had a spar x-2 motor. Reedley college, go check it out, no security

    • @hagerty1952
      @hagerty1952 25 дней назад

      That's actually the X1-A. The original X-1 has been on display at the Smithsonian from about 15 seconds after the Air Force stopped using it.

  • @michaellinner7772
    @michaellinner7772 Месяц назад +13

    Crossfield had balls of pure titanium.

    • @sim.frischh9781
      @sim.frischh9781 Месяц назад

      Unlikely, they would have made the plane too heavy for the record flight XD

    • @Lazmanarus
      @Lazmanarus Месяц назад +2

      @@sim.frischh9781 Titanium balls are lighter than steel balls.

    • @sim.frischh9781
      @sim.frischh9781 Месяц назад

      @@Lazmanarus But heavier than carbon-based life form ones still.

    • @Lazmanarus
      @Lazmanarus Месяц назад +1

      @@sim.frischh9781 When someone does something extremely brave, we generally say they have balls of steel, titanium is both harder & lighter than steel.

    • @sim.frischh9781
      @sim.frischh9781 Месяц назад

      @@Lazmanarus but also much more brittle.
      And still not as light as actual organic ones.

  • @LVSAR
    @LVSAR Месяц назад +6

    4:41 you state that Muroc is now Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC). DFRC was renamed Armstrong Flight Research Center several years ago, and therefore no longer called Dryden Flight Research Center. Dryden became the flight area when NASA moved most of the 800 series aircraft from Edwards to Palmdale Plant 42 in Palmdale CA.

  • @seanhewitt603
    @seanhewitt603 26 дней назад +1

    The story about the propeller through the body of the airplane,and Neil Armstrong being in the cockpit, that's the first I've ever heard about it.

  • @JohnHoranzy
    @JohnHoranzy Месяц назад +6

    Neil Armstrong was the most competent and capable pilot. He earned the position to be the first human on the Moon.

    • @r.b.ratieta6111
      @r.b.ratieta6111 Месяц назад +3

      I remember reading in a book about the Apollo program that Jim Lovell said it was bittersweet to watch Neil be the first to step on the moon. Paraphrased: "Neil was a fine pilot and a good man, we all liked him. At the same time, each and every one of us was secretly wishing it was us that had that opportunity."
      They had no hard feelings against Neil, but when you're an Astronaut, you have a natural Alpha-type personality.

  • @drmarkintexas-400
    @drmarkintexas-400 Месяц назад +7

    🎖️🏆🙏⭐
    Thank you for sharing this

  • @josephharvat6202
    @josephharvat6202 Месяц назад +1

    Crossfield was one of my childhood heroes. He went on to pilot the X-15. He wasn't picked for the Mercury program because he wasn't a military pilot.

    • @hifi6638
      @hifi6638 Месяц назад +1

      He piloted the X15 only for the builder, to prove deliverable for flight testing by NACA/NASA. The actual test flights were flown by other pilots. Crossfield had expected that the builder would also do the flight testing. Instead, once the craft was shown to be in deliverable condition it/they were taken away by the flight testing teams who had their own pilots.

  • @johndyson4109
    @johndyson4109 23 дня назад +1

    The swept wing was crucial in achieving Mach 2 flight..Those test pilots had A LOT OF BALLS!!!

  • @Istandby666
    @Istandby666 Месяц назад +3

    @12:54
    You can't combine Muroc and Edwards.
    They are different names of the base at different times for different reasons.

  • @RussellBond-zh9qw
    @RussellBond-zh9qw Месяц назад +2

    I can still remember the first time I saw Glamorous Glennis as Yeager named the X-1 and thinking about how brave the Men who were the pioneers of the Sound Barrier Research and the attempts to understand and surpass its limits on our future travels. They didn't know if they could pass Mach or if they were going to fly strait into a Unpenetrable and solid barrier and be smashed to jelly. I wish I was just 1/4 that brave and had just 1/10 the skill and opportunity.

  • @marvelfanalliance7725
    @marvelfanalliance7725 Месяц назад +1

    My local community college campus has a Douglas Skyrocket mounted on a pylon in the middle of the campus. It's located at Antelope Valley College in Lancaster, CA. Sometimes, I sit underneath it on the grass and enjoy my lunch. 😊

  • @g3mck120
    @g3mck120 Месяц назад

    I was very young, but I can remember sitting in front of the black and white TV in our living room, watching the adventures of "Jet Jackson and the Secret Squadron". He flew a 2-seater version of the Skyrocket from his secret base. That show was apparently a successor to Captain Midnight, which was before my time. I never drank Ovaltine or got a secret decoder ring, either.
    The Skyrocket is unquestionably the prettiest test plane of its generation. That it was record-breakingly fast is just icing on the cake.

  • @loacoonian
    @loacoonian 20 дней назад

    Love the synth. Got Tokyo vibes.

  • @andrewmcwilliams1626
    @andrewmcwilliams1626 Месяц назад +1

    There is a D-558 hanging on the wall at the naval aviation museum in Pensacola FL.

  • @hifi6638
    @hifi6638 Месяц назад +4

    ARRRRGGHHH!!!
    @2:23 it is NOT “Nakkuh” It is “The N.A.C.A.”
    Nobody spoke acronyms for initials back then. My dad was Chief Aerodynamicist for the agency. I used to play in the halls of Headquarters in the Dolly Madison House on Lafayette Square when dad would go into the office on weekends.
    N - A - C - A was a family like organization back then. And nobody called it anything except its initials one by one.

    • @FatherExo
      @FatherExo 27 дней назад +2

      Cringe i think youre lying
      Anyways since literally anyone in the DOD and engineering field likes using initialism. Im going to say “Nakkuh” and theres nothing that will ever change my mind

    • @hifi6638
      @hifi6638 26 дней назад +1

      @@FatherExo i got used to ppl like you decades ago. I was there when The N.A.C.A. existed, were you?

    • @FatherExo
      @FatherExo 26 дней назад +1

      @@hifi6638 you mean nakkuh

  • @shockwave326
    @shockwave326 Месяц назад +2

    i knew about these planes im 60 and an aircraft nut,,, thanx for the extra details

  • @SPak-rt2gb
    @SPak-rt2gb Месяц назад +4

    One sits at the Planes of Fame Chino, California

    • @sim.frischh9781
      @sim.frischh9781 Месяц назад

      That´s a place i would like to visit if i ever come to the US.
      One of several interesting places.
      Not sure whether i would visit Washington, i still don´t understand why it´s called the Washington Monument when it looks more like a tribute to Bill Clinton ;)

  • @JSFGuy
    @JSFGuy Месяц назад +3

    Just happened to be checking.

  • @Goldetector
    @Goldetector Месяц назад +1

    I didn't know this about Neil Armstrong. The Balls

  • @whytebearconcepts
    @whytebearconcepts 20 дней назад

    Mav: "Just....a little........push....."

  • @socaljarhead7670
    @socaljarhead7670 Месяц назад

    There was an I’m sure there still is an NF - 104 on a pedestal in front of the test pilot school at Edwards. I was there in the late 90s with my Marine Reserve squadron. Remarkably small aircraft.

  • @brianartillery
    @brianartillery Месяц назад

    I had a Revell kit of this aircraft. Considering it was released in 1955, it wasn't bad. Weird scale, though. An obvious 'Fit the box' kit.

  • @mingfanzhang4600
    @mingfanzhang4600 Месяц назад +3

    😊❤😊❤😊

  • @dougcastleman9518
    @dougcastleman9518 Месяц назад

    Mach 2 was never a “barrier” but just another goal. Mach one might have been considered a barrier, but after that, no more. Even Mach one wasn’t considered unobtainable. The V-2 certainly went much faster, as well bullets. But it did have a nice ring to it.

  • @cmdrflake
    @cmdrflake Месяц назад +1

    The Navy had it’s own aircraft (the skyrocket) essentially to protect NACA and the their interests as opposed to that of the Air Force. It was very problematic to justify such needless duplication. It was just this idiocy that led to Eisenhower and congress to re-organize NACA to NASA in response to Soviet satellite launches.

  • @Tomcatntbird
    @Tomcatntbird 18 дней назад

    Meanwhile, the SR71 resulted in all this research ❤

  • @TheUmdexMan
    @TheUmdexMan Месяц назад +1

    Plane go fast me likey

  • @frozencanary4522
    @frozencanary4522 Месяц назад +1

    🛩🛩🛩🛩🛩🛩

  • @spidennis
    @spidennis Месяц назад

    Tangerine Dream sound track?

  • @Ro-Bucks
    @Ro-Bucks 13 дней назад

    I would have dropped to, you're sitting in a smaller aircraft attached to a really big ones that seem about to break apart. I don't care if my wings are untested, I'll see you on the ground best of luck to ya all lol

  • @jameseubanks1817
    @jameseubanks1817 Месяц назад

    How in he'll do you make instruments to give you accurate information on stuff that no one has ever done before? Just supersonic guessing?

    • @Johnwashere-dt2ov
      @Johnwashere-dt2ov 15 дней назад

      You study hard, learn science, physics, maths and become an Engineer. A real one. Not the ones that fix your stove.

  • @SamIIs
    @SamIIs Месяц назад +1

    9:20

  • @mingfanzhang8927
    @mingfanzhang8927 Месяц назад +2

    ❤😂😂😂😂😂😂❤

  • @guyh.4553
    @guyh.4553 Месяц назад

    Imagine just exactly could have happened if the Navy, Air Farce, & & NASA ALL worked together under one project? Consolidation of resources, especially brain power, could have & should have happened. And remember, ALL of these feats were accomplished by using slide rulers & hand drafting. There were no computers until roughly into the Gemini Project were available. And is it just me, or does this rocketship look similar to the F-35? 😊

  • @dartviader6292
    @dartviader6292 Месяц назад

    Now I'm waiting for history of first Warp 5 starship. ;)

  • @markxfarmer6830
    @markxfarmer6830 Месяц назад +1

    Not classified (besides a few design elements) and I’ve known about it since the 60s (as a kid). Just more bogus clickbait, lackluster research and miserable b-roll.

  • @nmarks
    @nmarks Месяц назад +1

    Oh look, it's the Miles M.52.

  • @christophercoupe5006
    @christophercoupe5006 21 день назад

    Since when is 1291 mph mach 2??? (12:38) Mach 2 is 1540mph!!!!

    • @KSparks80
      @KSparks80 19 дней назад +2

      Mach 2 is 1291mph when it's at 60,000' altitude at -86.69*f. That's when! Mach 2 at sea level and 59*f (the std. day) is 1522mph

    • @Harley-D-Mcdonald
      @Harley-D-Mcdonald 11 дней назад

      The mach speed changes at different altitude.

    • @christophercoupe5006
      @christophercoupe5006 11 дней назад +1

      @@Harley-D-Mcdonald Thank you

    • @Harley-D-Mcdonald
      @Harley-D-Mcdonald 11 дней назад +1

      @@christophercoupe5006 it seems wrong but when you consider air temperature and density it makes sense. What I think is cool is all the scientific and engineering that went into those old analog units. Very cool and very fun.

  • @jamesragus1577
    @jamesragus1577 Месяц назад

    Complimentary algorithm enhancement comment!😊

  • @camdenharper7244
    @camdenharper7244 15 дней назад

    FIA. we know we can't win so let's make it as stupid and impossible for everyone else

  • @jacquesmertens3369
    @jacquesmertens3369 Месяц назад +1

    Would be nice if you hired a narrator.

  • @dhroman4564
    @dhroman4564 Месяц назад +3

    Love the channel but the click bait thumb nails are stupid.

  • @hagerty1952
    @hagerty1952 Месяц назад +2

    Please, please, PLEASE! "N.A.C.A. was never pronounced "nack-a." It was an abbreviation, not an acronym. For it's entire existence from the 1920's until it was absorbed into the newly-formed NASA in 1958, it was referred to as "En-A-Cee-A." I mention this on every video you produce but apparently you don't read this, or don't care.
    I love your videos, but this is a serious historical error.

    • @leechjim8023
      @leechjim8023 25 дней назад

      Picky, picky, picky! Now wipe off your tears!😮

    • @hagerty1952
      @hagerty1952 24 дня назад

      @@leechjim8023 - Yes, sir, Mr. Leech! I'll see you next time I'm at Afrack. What's that? Oh, it's the Armstrong (formerly Dryden, formerly Muroc) Flight Research Center. But you knew that, right?

    • @Stuart-nf4rw
      @Stuart-nf4rw 23 дня назад

      It's AI audio

    • @hagerty1952
      @hagerty1952 23 дня назад

      @@Stuart-nf4rw - Somehow, I don't think it is, unless the guy sampled his own voice. And if it is, then why can't train it to pronounce N.A.C.A right? After all, the periods are right there.

  • @flyingdutchmanindustries5877
    @flyingdutchmanindustries5877 23 дня назад

    I wanted to watch the entire video, but the super corny music prevented me. Not sure where you got this 80's sounding elevator music, but it was terrible. I don't understand what the music is for anyway - what does it do?
    Anyway, no more Dark-Series for me. 👎

  • @dubnutter
    @dubnutter Месяц назад +3

    FiRsT 😜

  • @franksmith3602
    @franksmith3602 Месяц назад +1

    when Dacron was first invented. X pilots had Airo flight suits. woven on there body. thought was they would be protected from subatomic particles at speeds that are still classified. problem , the flight suits shrank. all the bodies fluids were pushed up to the skull. the x pilots did break all speeds records, and died doing it. there head, were the size of water melons. they gave there last debriefs as they died. telling what it was like to travel faster than light. hanna hanna, yellow, white swan 1978. arura nicked named a time slider, is the fastest craft ever built by humans. plasma powered. no fuels or sound, or trail of anything.

    • @joeh4295
      @joeh4295 Месяц назад +3

      What are you talking about?

    • @JimGeigerMusic
      @JimGeigerMusic Месяц назад

      ​@@joeh4295It's the shrooms, dude

    • @joeh4295
      @joeh4295 Месяц назад

      @@JimGeigerMusic 😆😆

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 Месяц назад +1

    not that much of difference is there between jet engine and rocket engine

    • @bdwillis8284
      @bdwillis8284 Месяц назад +1

      Jet engines use ambient oxygen, rockets do not. Rockets use oxidizers in the fuel. I think?

    • @nmarks
      @nmarks Месяц назад

      Once a rocket engine is ignited it burns untill all it's fuel is exhausted.

    • @johnbrobston1334
      @johnbrobston1334 Месяц назад +2

      @@nmarks Solid fuel will. Liquid fuel can be shut off and restarted repeatedly.

    • @clc2328
      @clc2328 Месяц назад +1

      uh....yea there is

    • @Jakal-pothos
      @Jakal-pothos Месяц назад

      So very wrong