The Electron: Crash Course Chemistry #5

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 сен 2024
  • Hank brings us the story of the electron and describes how reality is a kind of music, discussing electron shells and orbitals, electron configurations, ionization and electron affinities, and how all these things can be understood via the periodic table.
    Watch this video in Spanish on our Crash Course en Español channel! • El electrón: Crash Cou...
    Pssst... we made flashcards to help you review the content in this episode! Find them on the free Crash Course App!
    Download it here for Apple Devices: apple.co/3d4eyZo
    Download it here for Android Devices: bit.ly/2SrDulJ
    Table of Contents
    Snobby Scientists 00:43
    Great Dane/Bohr Model 01:57
    Electrons as Music 04:13
    Electron Shells and Orbitals 04:44
    Electron Configurations 05:54
    Ionization and Electron Affinities 08:17
    Periodic Table 10:18
    Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at / crashcourse
    Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
    Facebook - / youtubecrashcourse
    Twitter - / thecrashcourse
    Instagram - / thecrashcourse
    CC Kids: / crashcoursekids

Комментарии • 3,2 тыс.

  • @crashcourse
    @crashcourse  4 года назад +260

    Pssst... we made flashcards to help you review the content in this episode! Find them on the free Crash Course App!
    Download it here for Apple Devices: apple.co/3d4eyZo
    Download it here for Android Devices: bit.ly/2SrDulJ

  • @jplant1414
    @jplant1414 5 лет назад +1101

    Course progression:
    Vid 1: Learn to crawl.
    Vid 2: Crawling forwards, backwards, turning and varying speed.
    Vid 3: Learning to stand up.
    Vid 4: First walking steps while holding on to tables, railings or someone's hand.
    Vid 5: Competing in the decathlon while sampling magic mushrooms between events.
    Can't wait for Vid 6...

  • @XpertPilotFSX
    @XpertPilotFSX 8 лет назад +2191

    No matter how many times I watch this, I still can't wrap my mind around electron orbitals.

    • @raw7504
      @raw7504 8 лет назад +23

      Same

    • @notyourbusiness5530
      @notyourbusiness5530 8 лет назад +102

      Read a book on it first, then when you come back to this video you'll understand everything.

    • @alphadawg81
      @alphadawg81 8 лет назад +29

      I have the same problem. Glad I'm not alone.

    • @DamiiCalifornia
      @DamiiCalifornia 8 лет назад +535

      Consider a train track, the shape of it doesn't matter but let's say its just a circle. We can say at any time where the train is situated and at which speed it's travelling. You can draw a circle and mark a point of where the train is.
      Now with very very small particles (like electrons) we can't exactly know where it's located or what it's speed is (this is known as Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle).
      So we know the electron is around the core (nucleus) of the atom somewhere, but we don't know exactly. But thanks to mathematical equations we know all the possible locations it can be and where it's more possible to find it. These 'groups of locations' are the orbitals. It's just the shape of where we can probably find the electron.
      For the train all the possible locations is the circular track, for the electron it's the shape of the orbital.
      For the train we can pinpoint the exact location on this track, for the electron we don't know exactly where, but we know it's somewhere in the orbital and in this orbital some 'spots' are more probable to find the electron.
      Hope this helped!

    • @YashArya01
      @YashArya01 8 лет назад +26

      Nicely explained!

  • @KeysmashGirl
    @KeysmashGirl 8 лет назад +3371

    What I learned from this video:
    Electrons are music and this guys name is Hank.

    • @starcaster1400
      @starcaster1400 8 лет назад +135

      i have to watch each of these videos on an average of 100000000 times before it all starts making a little sense

    • @sachinraghavan4556
      @sachinraghavan4556 8 лет назад +9

      +Malak Hasham Same

    • @15float
      @15float 7 лет назад +4

      Lmfao me to

    • @nicu_danciu
      @nicu_danciu 7 лет назад +6

      ... plus the fact that Hank is the most boring man on the Planet Earth...

    • @roshanshah3425
      @roshanshah3425 6 лет назад +1

      i agree with u

  • @geniustennisacademy5182
    @geniustennisacademy5182 9 лет назад +3079

    Okay, okay, for all of you that are confused. Before I begin explaining, it is important to understand that an "orbit" and an "orbital" are two completely different things. So every atom's electrons occupy energy levels, which are also called orbits, which are those circles you see around the nucleus of an atom in those diagrams you see. An energy level could be 1, 2, 3, 4, and so on, and is usually represented in chemistry by the variable "n". Note that these types of diagrams aren't showing literally how the electrons look when they travel around a nucleus; that is dictated by energy sublevels, so try to put it out of your mind that electrons always look like circles around the nucleus all the time. These energy sublevels, are the s, p, d, and f that he was talking about. These sublevels dictate the shape of the path that the electrons are most likely to travel through; so basically, that's what an orbital is: the shape of the path an electron is most likely to take when it travels around its nucleus. An orbital of the s sublevel looks like a plain circle; a p sublevel orbital looks like an infinity sign; a d sublevel orbital looks like a 4 leaf clover; an f sublevel orbital takes a shape that... really doesn't have a name. Every orbital can hold a maximum of two electrons that have opposite spins, and every sublevel has a maximum capacity for orbitals; the s sublevel holds 1 orbital, the p sublevel holds 3, the d sublevel holds 5, the f sublevel holds 7, and so on. So now you might be thinking, okay, so it'll be 1s 1p 1d 1f, then 2s 2p 2d and 2f, but in fact, that's incorrect. Through Bohr's discoveries, he found that the first energy level can only hold two electrons, the second can hold 8 electrons, the third can hold 8 electrons, the fourth can hold 18 electrons, and the fifth can also hold 18 electrons. You can actually see this in the periodic table; the first period only has 2 elements, the second period has 8, the third has 8, the fourth has 18, and the fifth also has 18. So in order from least to greatest energies, this is how energy levels and their sublevels are written; 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, 4p, 5s, and so on as shown in the small graph below
    1s

    • @millieristic
      @millieristic 6 лет назад +118

      oh yes it helps, thank you

    • @Jazzimus
      @Jazzimus 6 лет назад +67

      Thanks man this really helped

    • @lswarden1046
      @lswarden1046 6 лет назад +128

      Finally, someone who makes sense!!!! Wish there was some way to move this explanation to the top of the comments list!

    • @zeannejoylabadia222
      @zeannejoylabadia222 6 лет назад +19

      Thanks

    • @davidgrigsby8963
      @davidgrigsby8963 6 лет назад +81

      Helps? Are u kidding? U must be (@ the very least! ...) Boarder-line genius-level intellectual. At any rate, thank you--&, well on u! dbg

  • @2020balance
    @2020balance 8 лет назад +3971

    Dedication is watching all 46 chemistry videos before your chemistry final!

    • @kateevans2362
      @kateevans2362 8 лет назад +47

      I'm doing that too :)

    • @munchie.madness
      @munchie.madness 8 лет назад +111

      +2020balance True dedication is watching all the world history videos before your ap exam

    • @wunderkind7762
      @wunderkind7762 8 лет назад +14

      +Sam Clifford best of luck to you.

    • @wunderkind7762
      @wunderkind7762 8 лет назад +31

      I am using these to fill in for a chemistry course, because my school lacks one in my current year.

    • @znout65
      @znout65 8 лет назад +3

      +2020balance two days left

  • @andresperalta4436
    @andresperalta4436 8 лет назад +689

    2:16 For consolation Hank I discovered you first so you're my original green.

  • @dylankrejci5693
    @dylankrejci5693 9 лет назад +124

    Great videos. I'm 13 years old and hoping to grow up to be a chemical engineer, so this is a really helpful and interesting series to tell me more about what I already know about chemistry.

  • @CrackyBoi69
    @CrackyBoi69 8 лет назад +315

    I'm taking notes on the whole series. I currently have 9.5 pages worth of notes from episodes 1-4 alone. Remember everyone, knowledge is power. The more knowledge you posses, the more powerful you are.

    • @miriellecaradonna617
      @miriellecaradonna617 8 лет назад +13

      i'm doing the same thing

    • @garfieldphillips3214
      @garfieldphillips3214 8 лет назад +3

      +1

    • @florrrina
      @florrrina 8 лет назад +45

      Lmao, relax.
      I get it, though. The only issue is that I'm HORRIBLE at taking good notes. I either write EVERYTHING down or just take down the wrong/trivial points.

    • @theramblingreviewer5150
      @theramblingreviewer5150 7 лет назад +12

      I used to do the same, however I personally think writing too much can actually make the note process more difficult. It also is pretty stressful. I've been trying to employ the Feynman technique recently in the note taking I have been doing, and I would recommend looking into it.

    • @jackbalitok3910
      @jackbalitok3910 6 лет назад +2

      I'm going supersaiyan!

  • @ranshibuki9659
    @ranshibuki9659 7 лет назад +129

    "This machines Pwns n00bs"
    "Hank is a mass of incandescent gas"
    i will now pay more attention to CC intros

  • @omjoeandsteve
    @omjoeandsteve 9 лет назад +638

    This is the first crashcourse video I've understood almost nothing of.

    • @ghostnoodle9721
      @ghostnoodle9721 5 лет назад +50

      The whole chemistry is music threw me off a whole lot

    • @zalinakhan7179
      @zalinakhan7179 5 лет назад +3

      honestly same

    • @blakebauman6374
      @blakebauman6374 5 лет назад +29

      This might help
      Okay, okay, for all of you that are confused. Before I begin explaining, it is important to understand that an "orbit" and an "orbital" are two completely different things. So every atom's electrons occupy energy levels, which are also called orbits, which are those circles you see around the nucleus of an atom in those diagrams you see. An energy level could be 1, 2, 3, 4, and so on, and is usually represented in chemistry by the variable "n". Note that these types of diagrams aren't showing literally how the electrons look when they travel around a nucleus; that is dictated by energy sublevels, so try to put it out of your mind that electrons always look like circles around the nucleus all the time. These energy sublevels, are the s, p, d, and f that he was talking about. These sublevels dictate the shape of the path that the electrons are most likely to travel through; so basically, that's what an orbital is: the shape of the path an electron is most likely to take when it travels around its nucleus. An orbital of the s sublevel looks like a plain circle; a p sublevel orbital looks like an infinity sign; a d sublevel orbital looks like a 4 leaf clover; an f sublevel orbital takes a shape that... really doesn't have a name. Every orbital can hold a maximum of two electrons that have opposite spins, and every sublevel has a maximum capacity for orbitals; the s sublevel holds 1 orbital, the p sublevel holds 3, the d sublevel holds 5, the f sublevel holds 7, and so on. So now you might be thinking, okay, so it'll be 1s 1p 1d 1f, then 2s 2p 2d and 2f, but in fact, that's incorrect. Through Bohr's discoveries, he found that the first energy level can only hold two electrons, the second can hold 8 electrons, the third can hold 8 electrons, the fourth can hold 18 electrons, and the fifth can also hold 18 electrons. You can actually see this in the periodic table; the first period only has 2 elements, the second period has 8, the third has 8, the fourth has 18, and the fifth also has 18. So in order from least to greatest energies, this is how energy levels and their sublevels are written; 1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, 4p, 5s, and so on as shown in the small graph below
      1s

    • @boazrobin
      @boazrobin 5 лет назад +3

      if try you can understand

    • @chelseamurphy9171
      @chelseamurphy9171 4 года назад +2

      @@blakebauman6374 thank you do much omg this helps

  • @freddyfozzyfilms2688
    @freddyfozzyfilms2688 4 года назад +89

    Physicists: we invented quantum mechanics so we can predict electron configurations before discovering them.
    Chemists: Let's put them in a table and force people to memorize it.

  • @booshbabe55
    @booshbabe55 8 лет назад +33

    "Like certain other people I might name he sometimes felt like he was in the shadow of this older, more successful brother"
    Omg.
    You and John are both magnificent and you both help me in different ways!

  • @Zosio
    @Zosio 9 лет назад +32

    My brain is not one that is naturally oriented toward the natural sciences, so I've been pretty anxious about taking my first college biology class.
    I had to watch this video over, and over, and over... but I *finally* got it. Each part starting clicking into place after each rewatch, and it was definitely worth it.
    Major thanks to Hank and his team for producing these videos. They're life-savers for students like myself.

  • @j.lombardo
    @j.lombardo 4 года назад +46

    “The music of electrons is not simple music. It’s no three chord song. It’s like Beethoven.” *plays Beethoven’s Ode to Joy - a piece that uses 3 chords*

  • @OrchidAlloy
    @OrchidAlloy 8 лет назад +501

    This video makes a lot of sense once you realize that Hank is a musician.

  • @JC19021
    @JC19021 9 лет назад +284

    I'm glad I'm not the only one that is incredibly confused. I've watched the video 4 times now and still can't make sense of much.

    • @samuelxu6878
      @samuelxu6878 9 лет назад +9

      First Time Watching: Wait... wait... what just happened?
      Second Time Watching: Oh... I still don't get it.
      Third Time Watching: Um... Oh... Okay...
      Fourth Time Watching: Okay, I think I got this... NOT.
      Fifth Time Watching: Okay, I got this. I really do.
      Sixth Time Watching: YES!!! I FINALLY UNDERSTAND!!! (Achievement Unlocked)
      If you didn't get it, skip to 11:45 (ruclips.net/video/rcKilE9CdaA/видео.html#t=705)

    • @xFirebird925x
      @xFirebird925x 9 лет назад +1

      |Jake|C| Are you taking a Chemistry course? If you are taking a course in Chemistry and you are watching this to reinforce the learning, this video will probably work better. Just sayin'.

    • @JC19021
      @JC19021 9 лет назад

      xFirebird925x Yes but just Chemistry I.

    • @xFirebird925x
      @xFirebird925x 9 лет назад +1

      John Miller That's nice. :D It's good to learn something everyday, isn't it?

    • @nickstoli
      @nickstoli 9 лет назад +4

      |Jake|C| How many times do you have to listen to a song to remember all the words? I'd say more than 4. A lot more. Well, why should this be any different? Keep at it. You'll be surprised because it'll seem like all of a sudden you make sense of it.

  • @uyenvu5568
    @uyenvu5568 8 лет назад +79

    As a music nerd, this made so much sense to me.

  • @ParkerToFetch
    @ParkerToFetch 9 лет назад +232

    Awww....
    YOU ARE NOT IN JOHNS SHADOW HANK.

    • @call-me-yaa
      @call-me-yaa 9 лет назад +8

      Yeah, he kinda is.

    • @ParkerToFetch
      @ParkerToFetch 9 лет назад +27

      Not for me.

    • @Krazycutiegurlxxx
      @Krazycutiegurlxxx 9 лет назад +34

      +Zedd Hopkins I kinda prefer hank.

    • @Spycyzygy
      @Spycyzygy 9 лет назад +3

      +Zedd Hopkins except that he isn't an unquestioning unthinking ideologue like John

    • @karimsaleem1983
      @karimsaleem1983 8 лет назад +1

      +Parker So Fetch jhon green is my favourite he is very funny losers

  • @rlrsk8r1
    @rlrsk8r1 10 лет назад +165

    So, the orbitals are similar to the propeller disc of an airplane. The propeller is turning so fast that we can't actually see it, but you can see a blurry disc. At any given time, you know the propeller blades are somewhere in that disc, but it would take a camera with a very rapid shutter speed to exactly locate it. The exact position of the blades doesn't actually matter in a practical sense, because basically nothing can make it through the prop arc without hitting a blade. Same with electron orbitals.

    • @caoscosmos
      @caoscosmos 10 лет назад +19

      Nice analogy!

    • @JamDaaMan
      @JamDaaMan 10 лет назад

      Yep

    • @caoscosmos
      @caoscosmos 10 лет назад +5

      If by saying "only" a theory you're implying that it's an educate guess then you're wrong.
      Maybe what you have in mind is an "hypothesis" instead of a theory.
      If you have another theory that could replace the atomic theory...please, share it with us! We are eager to hear you groundbreaking proposal!

    • @JamDaaMan
      @JamDaaMan 10 лет назад +1

      ***** I'm not trying to undermine atomic theory, all I'm saying is its only a theory - just as the 'big bang' is a theory. Atomic theory is simply the most accepted theory in its field, however that does not change the fact that it is a theory. And not to be a grammar nazi, but check your grammar -(educate, an hypothesis) that is all.

    • @caoscosmos
      @caoscosmos 10 лет назад +5

      BilboMcSwaggins "Is its" maybe before checking my grammar you should check yours.
      I won't argue any further with you because we seem to have different perceptions about how accurate and true a theory can be.
      I think that it's just a matter of personal appreciation.

  • @jbkjbk1999
    @jbkjbk1999 9 лет назад +542

    "litlle babies or women" o 19th century scientists, how you amuse us.

    • @jbkjbk1999
      @jbkjbk1999 9 лет назад +26

      ***** Why not both?

    • @MiguelMendozamiguelamd
      @MiguelMendozamiguelamd 9 лет назад +5

      +Totally Not A Cylon both
      both is good

    • @Henry-gv4yj
      @Henry-gv4yj 8 лет назад

      +Totally Not A Cylon Your videos are awesome. Just thought I'd let you know.

    • @ArtinTheBeast
      @ArtinTheBeast 6 лет назад +1

      Walker Hayes are you saying that we're still misogynistic?

    • @eleanorhuxley6959
      @eleanorhuxley6959 5 лет назад +4

      @@stellarmori what

  • @hanneliseirrah4755
    @hanneliseirrah4755 9 лет назад +180

    I'm so glad he kept explaining it through music; I don't understand chemistry well, but I understand music, and this helped more than any teacher has.

    • @marcinsobota14
      @marcinsobota14 8 лет назад +8

      +Hanneli Seirrah Luckily, I'm better at science, and in particular chemistry, than music, so this does not apply to me.
      Win.

    • @hendrickdias8366
      @hendrickdias8366 8 лет назад +5

      +Marcin Sobota same here, when he started to talk about notes, my mind had just blocked!

    • @rayres1074
      @rayres1074 8 лет назад +6

      +Hanneli Seirrah I remember an episode of Drake and Josh which was basically Josh teaching Drake chemistry through music.

    • @islandkidd97
      @islandkidd97 7 лет назад +1

      well.. you want to teach me..

    • @cammieknox7308
      @cammieknox7308 6 лет назад +1

      This confused me way more. Couldn't even watch the whole video

  • @GoodGlitterGumdrops
    @GoodGlitterGumdrops 9 лет назад +55

    I watch CrashCourse the night before any of my tests (as I am doing right now). It really helps everything finally click into place in my mind before I am tested over the material. Thank you Hank and the rest of the CrashCourse team for keeping my grades up!

  • @glennsnare09
    @glennsnare09 6 лет назад +16

    Your musical analogies really help me understand this stuff being a musician. You're an absolute genius and I want to watch every single one of the videos that you have ever made and ever will make again

  • @declanchang9864
    @declanchang9864 5 лет назад +44

    During summer vacation..
    Crash course: watch me!
    Me: no
    On the weekends...
    Crash course: watch me!
    Me: no
    Monday....
    Teacher : tomorrow is your exam
    Me : Crash course I need you
    Crash Course: no!

  • @zogfotpik8848
    @zogfotpik8848 8 лет назад +597

    The whole music analogy only served to confuse me more, hate to say.

    • @ProfessorSyndicateFranklai
      @ProfessorSyndicateFranklai 8 лет назад +32

      Don't take analogies literally.

    • @osoascam
      @osoascam 7 лет назад +1

      SAME

    • @jackbalitok3910
      @jackbalitok3910 6 лет назад +16

      That actually made sense. Confusion is a disturbance of thought. The electrons' movement is a disturbance but because most electrons wanted to move in a particular route, that route paves way that it leaves a tract, that tract are the spdf shapes.

    • @AllenGrimm1145
      @AllenGrimm1145 6 лет назад +4

      As of now, the comment above this is actually about how much the analogy helped them. I guess if you win some, you lose some. In any case, it's a little more concrete than most analogies I've heard.

    • @Gifxia
      @Gifxia 5 лет назад

      same:(

  • @ConvivialCadaver
    @ConvivialCadaver 8 лет назад +107

    I understood every video before this one but I didn't understand this video at all man

    • @dandavis6795
      @dandavis6795 7 лет назад +2

      I'm in the same boat. Effortless until right here. High school apparently didn't prepare me for RUclips

  • @TroggacomCactus
    @TroggacomCactus 10 лет назад +11

    A nice thing about your musical electron analogy is that having one extra electron makes an element want to get rid of it, like a supertonic resolving to tonic, and missing one does the same, like a leading tone. Furthermore, a half-full electron shell behaves kind of like a dominant or subdominant, not perfectly happy but stable enough.

  • @adamborison3054
    @adamborison3054 9 лет назад +185

    6:27 funny, but you're going to actually leave people thinking that there's a dog orbital

  • @TheTexas1994
    @TheTexas1994 7 лет назад +12

    I'm a chemical engineer, but I love learning the history involved in some of the chemistry that I study as well. I know a lot about chemistry, but I actually learned a lot of history from these videos.

  • @MUGENanaya
    @MUGENanaya 10 лет назад +10

    Id never thought id hear my two passions combine in this way

  • @milasyt
    @milasyt 9 лет назад +255

    I AM SO FUCKING PISSED AT MY HIGH SCHOOL CHEMISTRY TEACHERS!!!
    The way they taught us about atoms and electrons is so fucking wrong! It's taken me almost a month to get this is because I had to unlearn all the bull shit they told me about atoms in grade school to try and understand what's actually happening here. God damn it!

    • @milasyt
      @milasyt 8 лет назад +5

      +SilentMajority420 perfect point

    • @TayzerStrike
      @TayzerStrike 8 лет назад +17

      +Jesse Jacobs ...If you take AP Chem, they do teach you about electron clouds. They don't teach it to everyone because most people *cough cough*, would just get mad, and not understand it.

    • @justintime3534
      @justintime3534 8 лет назад +4

      +Jesse Jacobs chill bro

    • @EvilSandwich
      @EvilSandwich 8 лет назад +7

      +Jesse Jacobs To me, using the Bohr's model in school is fine for mental shorthand to count electrons. A bit like how you use an O-scope to measure waves even though real waves don't really look like that. Or using two dots and and curved line to depict a smilie face. However, that only works if when teaching the Bohr's model, the teacher stresses that the Bohr's model is NOT what atoms really look like. They're just useful symbols for an atom's make up.

    • @bohan2843
      @bohan2843 8 лет назад

      +justin lee LOL

  • @somewright4440
    @somewright4440 7 лет назад +3

    I recently decided to listen daily to at least 10 minutes of educational audio (can include video). Right now I'm swapping back and forth between "How to Win Friends and Influence People" and Crash Course Chemistry. While the previous four videos took around 15 minutes, this fifth one required 2 hours to complete due to all the additional research I did.
    Today was a good day.

  • @TheWanderbugChannel
    @TheWanderbugChannel 9 лет назад +175

    I feel so happy and smart whenever I finish watching a crash course video but this one made me scroll down to comment, depressed and suicidal because I didn't understand a single thing.

    • @FROPDESAI
      @FROPDESAI 9 лет назад +39

      ***** Are you fucking kidding me?! A comment about a guy not understanding a simple video with obvious hyperboles makes you lose faith in the world?!

    • @voyagerabove4034
      @voyagerabove4034 9 лет назад +3

      ***** hyperbole is difficult

    • @ryekis
      @ryekis 9 лет назад +3

      TheWanderbugChannel electronconfiguration.info/ this will help along with the video

    • @kylelance4280
      @kylelance4280 9 лет назад

      +Tanishq Desai Are you fucking kidding me??? just about a joke wanting to make people laugh cause you to be so serious about everything?

    • @BiggestBelieberForever
      @BiggestBelieberForever 7 лет назад

      Exactly

  • @kaiwen1511
    @kaiwen1511 5 лет назад +16

    "Electrons are like music." "I don't kow anything about music."

  • @alphadawg81
    @alphadawg81 8 лет назад +365

    I usually like your videos a lot. But rushed a little bit too fast through that whole orbital subject. Could you please make another video explaining the orbitals, and how electrons stay in their designated orbitals, a little more detailed?

    • @aquirkypenguinuwu5626
      @aquirkypenguinuwu5626 8 лет назад +25

      That's why I rely on the subtitles, you should do it to. Only big con is that you'll be pausing a lot.

    • @lucasxu5597
      @lucasxu5597 6 лет назад +1

      I didn't get the orbitals either...

    • @ParkorEnderman
      @ParkorEnderman 4 года назад +4

      Episode 25

  • @grimmitachi
    @grimmitachi 10 лет назад +70

    Mind-fucked, barely got any of this.

    • @ThePizzaassasin
      @ThePizzaassasin 10 лет назад +3

      What's 9+10?

    • @jadathomas4966
      @jadathomas4966 10 лет назад +4

      AnthonyGiants 21

    • @ThePizzaassasin
      @ThePizzaassasin 9 лет назад +3

      Jada Thomas Thank you

    • @alice16399
      @alice16399 9 лет назад +2

      AnthonyGiants 19.

    • @nickstoli
      @nickstoli 9 лет назад +5

      This is my third go-around of all these videos. I get maybe half of it. That said, I retain more each time. Keep at it. If I can learn this, anybody can.

  • @JungThug
    @JungThug 5 лет назад +4

    For those of you struggling maybe I can help because I was right there with you. 1. Slow down and rewatch some or all of the video if you need to, he's giving a lot of information rather quickly.
    2. Grab a pen and pencil and write out his electron configuration chart with the diagonal lines and compare it to a pereodic table, going back and forth between that and the explanation.
    3. Even if you dont understand anything about music theory "listen" the backtrack gives examples of everything he describes while hes saying it, by this point you should be starting to grasp the chemistry and the feel of the music might just bring it home.

  • @djr5995
    @djr5995 8 лет назад +65

    Ahhh the elusive *d-og* orbital. 6:28
    I believe it is only found in *wolf*-ram
    P. S. W (wolfram) = tungsten

  • @mkp898
    @mkp898 10 лет назад +11

    This makes A LOT more sense to me than how my chem teacher explained it. Thank you Hank, this is gonna help me not fail!

  • @marcelolauzurique9060
    @marcelolauzurique9060 10 лет назад +48

    You know how to tell a cation and an anion
    CATions are PAWsitive

  • @MumboJ
    @MumboJ 5 лет назад +19

    Music may be Art, but the mechanics of Sound are a perfectly legitimate field of scientific study.
    Not to mention that everything (including Art) has some basis in Science anyway.

  • @dudedude3926
    @dudedude3926 7 лет назад +4

    Thank you, Hank, for giving me an appreciation for chemistry. For going into the backgrounds of chemists and incorporating my love of history to this subject, and furthering my understanding of it. Thank you for understanding that the statement my teachers constantly say, "School is for learning, not fun" is completely and utterly wrong and that entertainment is directly connected to retainment. Thank you for doing in 15 minutes what my teacher could not do in 180 days.
    Sincerely, a very grateful high school student.

  • @NixxSings
    @NixxSings 8 лет назад +5

    As a Science major with a background in music, this video not only made total sense, but it also kept me completely engaged. Thanks #CrashCourse !

  • @DaesungMars
    @DaesungMars 8 лет назад +217

    highschool chemistry is a nightmare you guys

    • @zuanyp.m.6231
      @zuanyp.m.6231 7 лет назад +4

      Daesung Mars agreed 😑

    • @mohamedmohamud1727
      @mohamedmohamud1727 7 лет назад +3

      Daesung Mars is apt biology harder?

    • @DaesungMars
      @DaesungMars 7 лет назад +6

      mohamed mohamud I took general biology last year. It was a lot of memorization but it was a lot easier than chemistry.

    • @mohamedmohamud1727
      @mohamedmohamud1727 7 лет назад +21

      Daesung Mars but if you take chemistry you can learn how to make meth in a lab

    • @sarcat6012
      @sarcat6012 5 лет назад +4

      facts

  • @rahmabakhtiar4142
    @rahmabakhtiar4142 8 лет назад +10

    The way you showed spdf shells with music tones was amazing idea !

  • @sabinegray1450
    @sabinegray1450 8 лет назад +15

    Actually binge watching this while taking notes was not what I came for. By the way, that musical metaphor was beautiful. I should've known this guy was a band nerd in high school. we have to stick together.

  • @banditrymile9241
    @banditrymile9241 8 лет назад +2

    yo so as someone who gets music but pretty much cries as soon as someone brings up science out of confusion, and who also happens to be taking their actual exams that will determine the rest of their life... these videos have helped wayyyy ore than my actual "teachers" at school. lookin at you mrs chadwick. pretty much marathoning these videos rn.

  • @therongjr
    @therongjr 11 лет назад +13

    Someone please tell me that I am not the only one who cries every time I watch 4:23 - 5:53, from the simplicity, elegance, and very-near-complete accuracy of Hank's presentation, especially understanding wave-particle duality and standing waves in terms of music? (Oh god, I'm such a huge nerd.)

  • @BrianLee01
    @BrianLee01 9 лет назад +24

    In 12 minutes I have learned more than I have learned in 2 weeks of my chemistry class

  • @MajorShot
    @MajorShot 8 лет назад +35

    99.9% of people don't know this
    So about 7 000 000 people do know this
    And this video has about 1 000 000 million views
    So a seventh of the people that know this you were the one that taught them

    • @Rebecca-qj1uk
      @Rebecca-qj1uk 8 лет назад +4

      7.2 billion, not million

    • @fireybear
      @fireybear 8 лет назад +7

      That's assuming everyone who watched this video understood what they just saw.

    • @kristianjuskiw8691
      @kristianjuskiw8691 8 лет назад

      There has to be more people than that, I mean all he talks about is the fact that electrons move in a wavy circle around the core.

    • @safiaberry
      @safiaberry 6 лет назад +1

      7.5billion people in 2018

  • @emilylucie7502
    @emilylucie7502 7 лет назад +7

    This is perfect for procrastinating revising my chemistry syllabus

  • @kvothe2144
    @kvothe2144 8 лет назад +128

    Information overload!...>.

    • @zeromailss
      @zeromailss 7 лет назад +2

      SuperDude214 my brain is melting, I think I'm just gonna continue watching and after I finish 46 video I'll just rewatch the whole thing again in hope that will make it easier to understand this

    • @kvothe2144
      @kvothe2144 7 лет назад +2

      don't do that that's counterproductive, try khan academy, its helpeful

  • @Christian-wb7je
    @Christian-wb7je Год назад +2

    Thank you, Hank Green, for making my CHEM 101 college class so much easier and less stressful than it needed to be.

  • @Kuraskvids
    @Kuraskvids 10 лет назад +20

    Yeah I would have to agree with some of these comments. If you don't know music theory is just makes it more confusing.

    • @alexcharles7712
      @alexcharles7712 6 лет назад

      If you don’t understand the music reference then clearly you are one of the most stupid people ever because year 8 music class covered that but clearly you are a high school drop out!

  • @journeeclouse4694
    @journeeclouse4694 Год назад +3

    Hank, you and your brother are both wonderful and equal contributors to the world of enlightenment. Don't feel like you're in his shadow, because the sun is shining on you both. You are a wonderful teacher, and I'm thankful to have access to this wonderful content!

  • @sergeantsonso3490
    @sergeantsonso3490 Год назад +2

    oh hey! i watched this a few months ago for fun, and now it's required watching for my college biology course! this is awesome!

  • @ChrisCB0328
    @ChrisCB0328 5 лет назад +4

    Watching 46 videos about my least favorite class before a final and actually enjoying it? Surprisingly yes.

  • @guyonacomputer1261
    @guyonacomputer1261 10 лет назад +22

    We are now the 1%. Suck it, Occupy.

  • @Jo-gj2nr
    @Jo-gj2nr 5 лет назад +7

    god you're the only reason im passing any of my science classes rn lmao

  • @tiffanywells1312
    @tiffanywells1312 11 лет назад +12

    THANK GOD for crashcourse! I will be lost without it

  • @Nsta1
    @Nsta1 10 лет назад +27

    Even though there are 8 notes in an octave, there are 7 notes because the top and bottom notes are the same. In chemistry there are truly 8 different "Notes" of electrons, which is a flaw in the music analogy.

    • @j.davidosorio1154
      @j.davidosorio1154 10 лет назад +9

      all analogies have limitations. even if you're correct about the characteristics of an octave, it was a clever way to tie in music theory and chemistry.

    • @trmn8tr3737
      @trmn8tr3737 10 лет назад +1

      also, it was stated in the previous episode that the periodicity was only seven before noble gases were added to the table

    • @edug8047
      @edug8047 10 лет назад +1

      Incorrect my friend, 12 equal tempered tuning have "7" notes to the octave, youcan have n notes to the octaves my friend and even in the equal tempered tuning one can argue that a octaves is another note that we percive logarhythmic similar. have a good day :))

    • @MusicByInterval
      @MusicByInterval 10 лет назад +1

      Music is not flawed! The octave is a doubling of a frequency and is not the same. In music terms the note sounded by two people is unison and the octave is an inverted unison, Unisons are right side up and have no tension. Octaves are upside down with the root at the top and so is unstable and has tension. Simpler said. when people sing the same note you can't tell who the root is but the octaves root is always the voice on top. Try in on a piano. Top note on an octave is always louder with the same force applied to both keys the top note is louder ie. root.
      The real problem here is "What do you think the term equal means." In number theory the first thing mathematician do is define equals. Dec, octal, hexadecimal base what?
      Correction: There are not 12 but 13 intervals we composer have used for over 200 years now. There are 13 levels of tension that I use to emotionally move you. Other music systems like Harry Parke's have divided the octave into as many as 137 parts. Etc. Different tuning systems that still use 12 divisions have newer and newer points of view over "Equals" as the human ear learns to hear higher and higher over tones and science extends our hearing to the atomic with every tone having it's own Eigen frequency value and NO TWO TONES ARE EVER THE SAME.
      The REAL universe in absolute exacting truthful terms.... There is no perfectly equals.. Only domains. [] or () or {} or " " or this scale. There are no two angels that are the same and no two of anything that is exactly the same. ONLY ideas!
      Think in scale. Without Wax Natch (%

    • @MusicByInterval
      @MusicByInterval 10 лет назад

      Edu G Thank you. Your so right it's perception. Just a notion in our head. Most primitive cultures can't hear an octave or find themselves in a black and white photo because they haven't learned the convention... N(% Wink.

  • @emmalielavers
    @emmalielavers 8 лет назад +1

    I want to thank all of you at Crash Course and everyone who works in part with Crash Course because you all have helped me realize how beautiful science is. Before watching your videos I never thought I wanted to go into a science field when i grow up but I truly do. Your videos have helped so many people and I want to ask you to please keep on making videos because there are so many children like me who don't know what the future holds but with these videos we can all figure it out together, Thank you xox

  • @vulcanangel735
    @vulcanangel735 9 лет назад +3

    Thank you so much for making these! Chemistry is very hard for me to understand, and my teacher is so monotone that I constantly end up dozing off in class! These videos are the only reason that I am passing the class at all, and I am extremely grateful for that. These videos are very entertaining and easy to comprehend. It also helps that you are able to go back and listen to parts again :) Once again, thank you.
    -10th and 11th grade chemistry students
    P.S you are the only youtube series that I recommend to people for help with school subjects. Keep up the good work!

  • @silverdeamonz1211
    @silverdeamonz1211 9 лет назад +111

    Took me two weeks to understand

    • @kylelance4280
      @kylelance4280 9 лет назад

      +Silver-Demon Productions i may ask you in the next 2 weeks

    • @milasyt
      @milasyt 9 лет назад +12

      +Silver-Demon Productions Still working on it....

    • @Henry-gv4yj
      @Henry-gv4yj 8 лет назад +9

      +Silver-Demon Productions
      Were you watching at 0.25 speed?

    • @silverdeamonz1211
      @silverdeamonz1211 8 лет назад

      no

    • @izzyg.1933
      @izzyg.1933 6 лет назад

      lol I'm gonna have to learn this in one night. wish me luck

  • @brandytanner8192
    @brandytanner8192 6 лет назад +2

    Wow. I'm a chemistry teacher and I learned stuff watching this. Also, I can totally use this if I have any musical students struggling to understand electron configuration. THANKS!

  • @scahsaint6249
    @scahsaint6249 9 лет назад +15

    I love studying the electron. It's a peculiar yet utterly important aspect of reality. It's the main reason anything in this world happens at all. Harnessing the electrons full power is like being a God yourself.

    • @ordinarymind1804
      @ordinarymind1804 9 лет назад

      Scah Saint Can you explain to me the end of the video, about the electron field,the excitation, then the orbital, what is Hank talking about?

    • @scahsaint6249
      @scahsaint6249 9 лет назад +11

      phuong le It can get complicated but i'll tell you the basics.
      In regards to the electron field, like Hank mentioned don't thing of electrons as small negatively charged particles circling an atom. Think of it as a fuzzy cloud around the atom and where the cloud is the densest is where there is a higher PROBABILITY of an electron being there. It's a probability because of the uncertainty principal. We can"t know the position and momentum of the electron.
      In terms of the orbitals. Electrons occupy certain orbitals depending on the atom. Orbitals range from S to F(S,P,D,F etc). Now, a simple atom like hydrogen, 1 proton, 1 electron. The electron will occupy for first and foremost orbital which is S. Each orbital can hold 2 electrons. Once an orbital is filled the electron must occupy another orbital. The next one would be P.
      This takes us to electron configurations. This is basically putting the electrons in the orbitals in the correct order. Each atom has it's own electron configuration depending on amount of electrons. When an electrons gets excited it moves to a higher energy level, becoming unstable. It will then release that energy and return back to it's ground state(unexcited state) this emergy is usually in the form of light. I will stop here for simplicity sake. Hope it helped.

    • @ordinarymind1804
      @ordinarymind1804 9 лет назад +2

      Scah Saint Wow. You sound like a professor. Thank you very much. I understand better now.

    • @scahsaint6249
      @scahsaint6249 9 лет назад +3

      phuong le No problem my friend. Keep learning and make the world that much of a better place. :)

    • @Krazycutiegurlxxx
      @Krazycutiegurlxxx 9 лет назад +1

      +Scah Saint Thanks to reading up on quantum mech just a twinge before starting chemistry, the whole wave-particle duality and heinsenburg uncertainty principle stuff seems fairly simple, but shit, electron configurations still confuse me. The video helped though, and i THINK i get it now. However... What are shells?

  • @nicolestarke9403
    @nicolestarke9403 9 лет назад +56

    Thank goodness, my chemistry book did not help, but this did! DFTBA

    • @FROPDESAI
      @FROPDESAI 9 лет назад +1

      Nicole Harris My book sucks. Thank goodness for the internet! DFTBA!

    • @johnguerriero4608
      @johnguerriero4608 9 лет назад

      FROP DESAI

    • @FROPDESAI
      @FROPDESAI 9 лет назад +1

      John Guerriero
      Yes?

  • @musiccouturexo
    @musiccouturexo 8 лет назад +2

    OMG MT TWO FAVORITE THINGS COMBINED: chemistry and music!!!! aghhh love the analogies

  • @niveenalkhourbatly841
    @niveenalkhourbatly841 8 лет назад +3

    That part when you said:" its all lies Hank, I'm leaving!". ou made me laugh my heart off :D
    I love you Hank

  • @rachelgoetz4288
    @rachelgoetz4288 10 лет назад +10

    I WAS following along with my periodic table. HA! Do I get nerd points? >.<
    And I really appreciate this video. I'm cramming/reviewing before Chem 2, and I honestly didn't get the orbitals concept the way my professor taught it. I feel like I actually understood it this time! THANK YOU!

  • @rocky4976
    @rocky4976 6 лет назад

    Thank you Hank Green. I am an old man semi-retired and am teaching my grandkids and using your crash course. #5 brought tears to my eyes. I lacked instrumental analysis in college to obtain a chemistry major and you've brought more light than many hours in college. Maybe I knew all this back then but I never understood the orbitals nor the brilliance of the periodic table. Trying to pass some on to the grandkids so they will be smarter than me.

  • @kooshkack
    @kooshkack 10 лет назад +43

    Is he a professor in a college, cause then I want to go to that college.

    • @PineappleAwesomenes1
      @PineappleAwesomenes1 10 лет назад +2

      look up vlogbrothers-all questions will be answered and you will laugh

    • @isakoqv
      @isakoqv 10 лет назад

      PineappleAwesomenes1 Who the eff is Hank?

    • @PineappleAwesomenes1
      @PineappleAwesomenes1 10 лет назад +37

      isakoqv Hank Green is a massive star that provides life for Earth. Hank is the center of the solar system, but in the dark ages people thought that the Earth revolved around Hank.

    • @heartles_xyz
      @heartles_xyz 10 лет назад

      isakoqv WHO THE FUCK IS STEVE?

    • @davidbaldwin2833
      @davidbaldwin2833 10 лет назад +1

      joeysucks42 hes the guy in minecraft XD

  • @averdict1758
    @averdict1758 8 лет назад +44

    5:27 Professor Snape? Is that you? Why are you holding babies?

    • @squashyhex9818
      @squashyhex9818 8 лет назад +1

      That is exactly what I thought!

    • @g40rc378
      @g40rc378 8 лет назад +2

      It's a bird, it's a plane, it's Octomom!

  • @xandrewvondiue522
    @xandrewvondiue522 10 месяцев назад +1

    I first watched these in highschool for fun, and as I rewatch them for nostalgia after college, I deeply admire all the humor in this. Awesome team, and amazing content

  • @b3yourself91
    @b3yourself91 8 лет назад +33

    Crash course music theory now?

  • @rosh7388
    @rosh7388 4 года назад +3

    I did follow with a periodic table and noticed it! I exist Hank! Btw thanks a lot for the lessons!❤️

  • @lisiisil2810
    @lisiisil2810 2 года назад +1

    Wooowww, this chanel is amazing, words can't even explain how good this is, helps, you don't know how much to understand chemistry. I am spanish and this is the perfect reason of why being bilingual, I feel privileged of knowing english.

  • @soniamangal7507
    @soniamangal7507 8 лет назад +4

    I'm watching this 8 months after my finals. haha
    I like chem but tbh it's created to make your mind go crazy lol

  • @felipegarcia5649
    @felipegarcia5649 10 лет назад +14

    how would shüdringer react if he knew that his cat is his defining feature

  • @themightykyuss
    @themightykyuss 5 лет назад

    5:28 i really like that symphony/harmony resolution analogy. Hank's
    commentary is always the perfect blend of profound, informative and
    entertaining.

  • @caro1942
    @caro1942 10 лет назад +5

    You lost me on this episode the first, second and third times through, but I came back armed with the first four chapters of the 'Chemistry for Dummies' ebook, an interactive periodic table iPhone app, and an actual pen and notebook (the nostalgia!) and I think I get wtf you're on about here. I just wish I could work through the rest of the Dummies book faster so I could understand the rest of these videos!

    • @likain2
      @likain2 10 лет назад

      Good for you :)

  • @opeth51
    @opeth51 6 лет назад +4

    After watching this, my head hurts with massive smartness migraine. This is what your mind being blown feels like. It hurts!!

  • @cathaldunne6741
    @cathaldunne6741 6 лет назад

    Just a point on the connection between music and chemistry. Yes music is much less complicated but as someone who has been studying both for the last six years and also as someone who is a big CC fan, I believe a music course would be something worth looking into.
    Some videos I would suggest
    1. Intro(With a basic introduction as to the impact of music on the world)
    2. Notes and Pitch
    3. Scales and Key signatures: The Major, The Minor and the Modal
    4. Chords and Triads
    5.Rhythm and Meter
    6. A real pain in the brass: Trumpets, trombones and the flugels
    7. Don't be percussion: Snares, Xylophones and Timps
    8. You had me at Cello: Guitars, Sitars and Violins
    9. Having a bari bad day: Clarinets, Saxophones and Flutes
    10. The Power of the Voice
    11. Other weird and wonderful instruments
    12. Ancient and Early music
    13. The Medieval Classics
    14. The Renaissance
    15. Too hot too Handel: The Baroque era:
    16. Dude, Bach off: The Classical Classical music
    17. The Liszt goes on: Romantic era
    18. Claude Debussy: Modern Classical Music
    19. The Modern Classics: Modern, post-modern and post post-modern
    20. Take it easy: Jazz, Blues, Soul and R&B
    21. Take me home: Country
    22. Down with the kids: Pop, Dance and the music of today
    23. Please stand up: Rap and Hip Hop
    24. Rock part I: Rockin' through the years
    25. Rock part II: For the love of Rock
    26. What Really makes a movie: Soundtrack and Scores.
    27. Can you hear the people sing?: Music in the Theatre
    28. Ska, Trad and Afro: Music in Culture
    29. Feeling all the feels(A good conclusion in any essay would reiterate what was said at the start and quite obviously the episode would discuss how music impacts us and drives us, inspires us and evokes the great bouts of soppy emotion that requires ice cream to remedy)
    I am gonna send this message 3 more times over the next week as it is something I know people would watch and enjoy. I can really see Mike Rugnetta doing the series as well with maybe a cameo or two from Hank.
    I'm not looking for credit since I have not done anything but IF there is anything I can do that would help including writing main points or topics to discuss, I will do so gladly.

  • @Fizer005
    @Fizer005 8 лет назад +27

    im so confused right now

  • @Novjuly
    @Novjuly 9 лет назад +5

    I love you, Hank!!! thank you for everything you do. I and so many others appreciate your ingenuity, courage, humor, and overall awesomeness. John Green is my favorite author, and I love watching his videos and crash course stuff because I love english and humanities! But I'm so very thankful y'all are a duo because it got me into watching your science-y stuff which I have a really hard time trying to understand (...abstract isn't my thing) but you make it so much fun and funny. I love you two and the way you see life! You've made me feel such better about myself knowing that nerdy=awesome!

  • @emilyparks8635
    @emilyparks8635 7 лет назад

    I took an entire organic chemistry class last year, and I just learned something new (or rather understood something new) because of this video. My mind is blown. I can't thank you enough, Crash Course! Because of your videos, I will graduate university someday with an actual understanding of the material! We need more teachers like you in school

  • @ericgamble5561
    @ericgamble5561 8 лет назад +39

    Did any one else notice the balloon animal electron orbital?

  • @coldflamelive1829
    @coldflamelive1829 8 лет назад +69

    im still confused

  • @1993Redemption
    @1993Redemption 8 лет назад

    This makes SO much more sense. I'm learning just the nuts and bolts of chemistry right now, and the part about electrons causing bonds with other elements by being covalent or ionic didn't seem to measure up. Like what if these tiny "particles" as I knew them as didn't bond correctly with another element, or what if too many particles tried to create the bond? Imagining it as a field of flexible energy makes much more sense in my opinion.

  • @ashleyl8619
    @ashleyl8619 10 лет назад +47

    I don't get it. I am utterly confused.

    • @elizabethj1167
      @elizabethj1167 10 лет назад +1

      Same here. I wish someone would help.

    • @ashleyl8619
      @ashleyl8619 10 лет назад +4

      Lol I thought that was what this video was for. Guess not

    • @NeonsStyleHD
      @NeonsStyleHD 10 лет назад

      verycoolwilliam
      Don't worry, you won't have to know this until year 12 of school.

    • @elizabethj1167
      @elizabethj1167 10 лет назад +1

      NeonsStyle Good point, as I am only 11.

    • @NeonsStyleHD
      @NeonsStyleHD 10 лет назад

      verycoolwilliam
      Just think of it this way. Pretty much most of this and the Biology is year 12 level. So if you can understand any of it (which is not too hard), you'll be way ahead of any of your friends and have a good start. Hell, you might even find it's what you want to do later in life. :)

  • @eugeniomyles
    @eugeniomyles 8 лет назад +3

    I just watched the coolest commercial for a hot plate. RUclips finally understands me.

  • @thelolminecrafter7830
    @thelolminecrafter7830 5 лет назад +1

    6:25
    I was trying not to laugh from the silliness of the animations, but the dog orbital got me.

  • @doodelay
    @doodelay 10 лет назад +103

    The music analogy really complicated things. I grasped almost nothing.

    • @discountconsulting
      @discountconsulting 10 лет назад +6

      He didn't explain the whole picture. Electrons are never fixed within a stable orbital position for long. They oscillate by absorbing and emitting energy. This is why everything is visible with an infrared camera; i.e. it is always resonating at some frequency that is emitting light waves (photons) at some frequency.
      If an electron is oscillating (vibrating) and sending out light waves, there is some other electron resonating with that vibration and absorbing them. E.g. your skin is emitting some heat waves that are being absorbed by your clothes and the clothes are emitting some heat back that's getting absorbed by your skin. In other words, they are vibrating in resonance with each other.
      So the music analogy really is about the notes (various frequencies) of photon (light energy) vibrations that connect different electrons that are resonating in harmony with each other. Electrons only absorb/emit specific frequencies of light at each orbital level, so they are like strings tuned to vibrate and resonate only at certain frequencies and not others.
      The only reason this is not completely true is because electrons can absorb part of a photon's energy and scatter the rest in a process called Compton Scattering. This sort of undermines the idea that electrons and photons only resonate at specific, matching frequencies. It would be as if you sung a D note that could cause sympathetic vibration in a string tuned to C and then the unused portion of the D note energy would scatter off as some lower note that contains the amount of energy not absorbed by the C string.

    • @matthewcapobianco9332
      @matthewcapobianco9332 9 лет назад

      It wasn't too complex. Haven't you ever listen to music.

    • @doodelay
      @doodelay 9 лет назад +6

      Matthew Capobianco I've listened to music but never learned about it in that much depth. It's like you've seen paintings but never learned about the in depth process of painting one. That's the same with me and music.

    • @horsecrazy2266
      @horsecrazy2266 9 лет назад +2

      doodelay Do you know what octaves are? That's basically all you need to know (I think, unless I missed something else). The analogy is actually pretty helpful if you understand... Octaves are how when you're listening to a song and a note sounds the exact same as another note only higher. It happens a lot if there's a guy singing with a girl unprofessionally but they're singing the same song. Or, I don't know if you've ever heard Max Schneider's covers on youtube, when he sings in his high voice so that it sounds the same as the original song but it's just higher, that's a difference in octaves. (If you haven't heard his covers, he uses his high voice towards the end of his 'How to Save a Life' cover by The Fray). Like in the scale do re mi fa so la ti do. Do and do are an octave apart. I don't know if this helps any...

    • @osoascam
      @osoascam 7 лет назад

      SAME. The music analogy made it worse.

  • @capple2949
    @capple2949 6 лет назад +4

    Is it bad that I’m binge watching all 46 of these videos because I have a test in the next 12 hours and don’t know what it’s on?

  • @FirstRisingSouI
    @FirstRisingSouI 8 лет назад +7

    I too am tired of people saying quantum mechanics is incomprehensible. It just makes people not try.

    • @alexturlais8558
      @alexturlais8558 8 лет назад +1

      we just look for excuses not to work

    • @Ny0s
      @Ny0s 8 лет назад

      +FirstRisingSouI Well, quantum mechanics is, actually, by essence, incomprehensible. I mean, it's out of reach of our comprehension. It doesn't mean we shouldn't try, but that we will never be abble to fully apprenhend it.

    • @FirstRisingSouI
      @FirstRisingSouI 8 лет назад

      ***** Speak for yourself. I understand it well enough, and anyone who applies themselves can too. It's not mystical, just weird.

    • @michaelsommers2356
      @michaelsommers2356 8 лет назад

      +FirstRisingSouI +"Speak for yourself. I understand it well enough, and anyone who applies themselves can too."_
      If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't. Sure, you might know it well enough to do calculations, but Feynman himself said that nobody understands quantum mechanics.

    • @FirstRisingSouI
      @FirstRisingSouI 8 лет назад

      Michael Sommers "If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't. Sure, you might know it well enough to do calculations, but Feynman himself said that nobody understands quantum mechanics."
      Argument from authority fallacy.
      When you are doing physics, there are three parts: the actual phenomena that are happening, the mathematical representation of what is happening, and the coupling between them.
      I claim that I can, to an extent, understand all 3. I can easily visualize a 3D vibrating field, leading to quantization of certain properties of the field like angular momentum and energy via harmonics. I can comprehend the uncertainty principle based on frequency and position spread of a wave. Are there things I don't understand about QM? Certainly. But there are things I don't understand about anything; why my shoelaces seem to get longer over time, for instance. When I say I understand something, I mean I understand it on the level that people generally do when they say they understand something.
      Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean nobody can.

  • @Daruqe
    @Daruqe 10 лет назад +19

    Lol Hank, I dunno if half your audience knows what the word "octave" means. Maybe I'm not giving them much credit, but have you read their comments?

    • @gregmosier5908
      @gregmosier5908 10 лет назад +14

      I would be surprised if many of the people that would watch this video wouldn't know what an octave is. It's hard to imagine getting to this part of your education without a reasonable exposure to music and it's concepts.

    • @shannonfickling449
      @shannonfickling449 10 лет назад

      I'm guessing some people are confused by the fact that a note gets repeated, just at a higher octave. You go abcdefga, so the A is argueably the same note even though one is higher than the first. The analogy is just a tiny bit flawed as this is technically the same note twice. Then again, I'm sure alot of people also just have no idea what an octave is. But hey, the point of an analogy is to help explain and make things easier to remember and I think the octave analogy will help those who understand basic music to remember this.

    • @gregmosier5908
      @gregmosier5908 10 лет назад +1

      Shannon Fickling smh... Another one that thinks that the typical visitor of this video would be searching out to learn about electrons and have no exposure to music. I'd put $1,000 on the masses on the street being more knowledgeable about a musical octave than valence electrons.

    • @ijustintime4u2bui46
      @ijustintime4u2bui46 6 лет назад

      I thought he said octet
      this is what I get for configuring IPv4 addresses on a semi regular basis

  • @rachelburroughs2383
    @rachelburroughs2383 6 лет назад +1

    Your amazing Hank. You taught me anatomy and physiology 2 years ago and I got a HD in that class. Next year I’ll be studying chem and I have no doubt I’ll get good marks again. Thank you so much!

  • @longshot606
    @longshot606 9 лет назад +17

    PLEASE DO CRASH COURSE PHYSICS!!!!

    • @harvirdhindsa3244
      @harvirdhindsa3244 9 лет назад

      Longbow101 Physics is too complicated and beautiful to condense properly into 10 minutes. At least I think so:)

    • @vijayagrawal3102
      @vijayagrawal3102 8 лет назад

      +longbow101
      actually they are planning to do a physics crash course ...but they haven't reached their $40000 patreon goal. So go and support their patreon to have a crash course physics

  • @michaelcheng569
    @michaelcheng569 8 лет назад +5

    "All do re mi far so la ti do"
    -Hank Green