First Thunderbolt 5 SSD test with M4 Max MacBook Pro!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 21

  • @UT48D
    @UT48D Час назад +2

    the fact that the cable is a part of the drive means once the cable breaks, the drive is done too. They should have made the cable detachable.

  • @arctan2010
    @arctan2010 47 минут назад +1

    Nice work, Jerry. You showed us it’s the cache size that makes the difference in sustained transfer of large files.

  • @chrisbogart687
    @chrisbogart687 5 часов назад +5

    I think they made the cable permanently attached so they can claim Waterproof and Weatherproof. BTW Sabrent has announced their Thunderbolt 5 drive and it has a removable cable. In the meanwhile I went with a ACASIS thunderbolt 4 NVME enclosure with a 2TB Sabrent NVME drive for half the price. I will wait until more drives hit the market and prices come down. Hoping for a Thunderbolt 5 NVME enclosure that I can reuse my current NVME SSDs which are more than fast enough to take advantage of the increased throughput of Thunderbolt 5.

  • @thetechpastor
    @thetechpastor 5 часов назад +3

    Even on my rather low end/cheap 4TB ssd in a cheap Amazon Thunderbolt 4 case, I obtain 2.5-2.8GB/s transfer, and I have two of them plugged into my M4 max MB. They are running through a thunderbolt 4 docking station. I have found that though 2.5GB/s is well below the MB 1TB drive, it is still much better than the same drives on my older M1 Studio Ultra.
    I am very pleased, and will look forward to the Thunderbolt 5 standard maturing as my MB ages.
    Good video, thanks.

  • @PerroneFord
    @PerroneFord 2 часа назад

    DIT/Data wrangling on movie sets is where I am seeing big needs now. While I am doing small shows, the guys doing big reality shows may be offloading north of 10-20TB per day. And yes, the speed REALLY matters.

  • @im_rajanluthra
    @im_rajanluthra Час назад +1

    nice bro love your efforts

  • @Langkinhsaigon-SaigonHoloscope
    @Langkinhsaigon-SaigonHoloscope 4 часа назад +1

    Same situation here as I used the Lacie Rugged TB3 vs Samsung T7, sometimes the Lacie even slower than SS :(. Thus I would not might to buy all TB either. Just 3.2 is enough.

  • @jmreagle
    @jmreagle 5 часов назад +1

    There’s also Sabrent.

  • @j340_official
    @j340_official 9 минут назад

    Is the nvme disk removable on the tB5 version of the envoy ? It is on the TB3 version.
    I can’t wait until the manufacturers release an empty TB5 enclosure, and adopt bring your own SSD! It looks the owc ssd has limited cache and when it runs out, the write speed slows down!
    I want an empty enclosure Like the ones from various manufacturers like acasis or owc express 1m2. Until then, I am not buying any TB5 drives.

  • @TheJoaolyraaraujo
    @TheJoaolyraaraujo 4 часа назад +1

    The cache is too small. Waiting for NVME TB5 enclosure.

  • @expectmore-
    @expectmore- 22 минуты назад

    Cache is King 😉

  • @digitaldevigner4080
    @digitaldevigner4080 2 часа назад

    On one hand since video editing is just reading files from the drive it might be close to the internal performance.
    From a transfer perspective however these are a bit disappointing. To be fair I don’t think k a lot of us plan on transferring a lot of data this way unless it’s to archive or transfer camera footage recorded to the external SSD. If camera footage is already on such a fast drive however there is very little point in doing that transfer unless one needs that drive right away for another shoot.
    I feel like the main point of a drive this fast is to read or write files from it directly. Even used in a camera it’s exceptionally overkill for current formats. Even recording external raw doesn’t need drives that fast to shoot with.
    So the transfer speed thing feels kind of like not a big deal I guess. I just don’t see myself realistically copying TB worth of data from internal to this drive in a regular basis. If one buys this it’s likely because they have a 256 or 512 GB Mac and they have no large files to actually transfer because it’s impossible to fit large files internally.
    Mac users could have seen this as an ultra fast backup solution to their larger storage Macs but again that feels kind of pointless to make that process faster.
    I just don’t see a lot of people copying over TBs of data on a regular basis from internal to external.

  • @reginaldwalton
    @reginaldwalton 6 часов назад +3

    Don't like the fact that the cable is permanently attached. Will pass on this one.

    • @p.nandhukutty7331
      @p.nandhukutty7331 4 часа назад

      But isn't that an advantage that you won't lose the cable right...???

    • @kajms222
      @kajms222 3 часа назад

      @@p.nandhukutty7331 It more than anything means that if the cable is damaged because it was turned too much in your bag or whatever, your very expensive drive with possibly important data is useless. A bit of bad luck and it doesn't take much for a cable to break.

    • @reginaldwalton
      @reginaldwalton 2 часа назад

      @@p.nandhukutty7331 For me, it's not an advantage, but more of a nuisance, especially with all the wear and tear it could suffer with all the handling. I don't lose cables, especially expensive ones.

    • @KoenKooi
      @KoenKooi 2 часа назад

      OWC has stated that the amount of warranty repairs for broken cables is far, far less than handling complaints by people using the wrong usb-c cable.
      Personally, I’d prefer a non-recessed socket and provide my own cables. Sabrent said they have a TB5 enclosure coming out soon and their TB5 SSD is also a bring your own cable.

    • @JamesBond-fo6ow
      @JamesBond-fo6ow 36 минут назад

      @@KoenKooi this, x100.