This goes to show that even the most seasoned of entrepreneurs still have failures. No matter the success or the failure, we must keep learning and moving forward.
They wasted so much money They would buy the most over by expensive material that had limited shelf life, enough to build say 8 rockets and then they would only bud 2 or 3 and would just eat the cost of tossing out the materials they over bought And 2 launches a year back to back is no good
The idea that Virgin Orbit was more flexible, more nimble because they could "launch from anywhere" is a nice marketing story and gives the impression they had hundreds of potential launch pads all around the world because all they needed was an airport runway. But that's marketing spin. In reality, the launch pad wasn't the runway. It was the highly modified 747 carrier aircraft - a flying launchpad - and there was only one of it. Instead of a nimble "launch from anywhere", the reality was the cumbersome "drag your entire launch pad ground infrastructure all around the world". And their concept of operations involved having a crew in close proximity to a fully loaded (and potentially explosive) rocket for several hours, including at rocket ignition. In every other rocket launch in the world, all humans are moved MILES AWAY long before liquid fuels are pumped into the rocket, and definitely during rocket ignition. In Orbit's case, the crew is sitting right on top of the rocket for hours and at the moment of rocket ignition are at most just a few hundred meters away. It was always a bad business model. And that's without even getting into the flawed economic analysis of the small satellite launch market.
even if that amount given too us we will send humans to Mars coz our Mars mission successfully get into Mars orbit in its first go or first attempt and total cost is around 73million $ 😂
@@CSAdityaHoon maybe a small constellation of satellites orbiting Mars, but human spaceflight is currently really expensive and much more difficult than just lifeless satellites.
@@1ndragunawan just a approx i tell yess we still need to develop lots of technologically advancement for it and no doubt Elon Musk will be the first who dominating in this race
@@CSAdityaHoon Oh yes he will. His strategy to the Moon and Mars is simple, make a proven reliable launch system. One that will be achieve lunar or Mars landing within 1 or 2 terms of US presidency. No sane US president will throw away that chance, to be forever remembered in the same positive tone as Kennedy. Even Trump bet on Elon, and now Biden does too. I suggest India signed Artemis Accord and purchase a Starship flight to the Moon and Mars, that will accelerate national achievement, and definitely faster than what China will be doing. This is the strategy of UAE, Saudi Arabia and other countries that signed Artemis Accord.
I was just wondering what happened to this project. This was actually my second favorite project next to SpaceX. It had alot of promise, it really is a good idea. Could have been a good vehicle for launching smaller crewed spacecraft one day. Would be cool to see another company pick this technology up.
didn't watch the video - but the answer to the title is Branson's choice for an air launch. Air launching a rocket severely limits the size of the rocket. Basically the launching aircraft replaces the stage 1 of a ground launch. Stage 1 of a ground launch does not suffer the same limitations as an air launch...
This Virgin doing everything from Cola to Airlines to Rockets always confused me. As a consumer I would not choose Virgin products. An obsolete company in my opinion. The super-woke advertisement of Virgin Atlantic finished if off for me.
Well, the idea of launching commercial satellites from an airplane sounds good until you look at the cost comparisons with more traditional rockets. The versatility of launching everywhere and in every vector may be useful for the military, but the civilian space sector doesn't need that yet. Why bother with that when SpaceX has cheaper launches per kilogram?
Virgin Galactic appears to be following a similar trajectory. In space travel, as in any business, success isn’t a matter of “build it, and they will come.” It requires far more than just launching a product. True success lies in solving complex challenges and achieving economies of scale, balancing innovation with sustainable operations.
I do not see this as a failure. This is part of capitalism. Hopefully someone will have a better idea or a better implementation next time. Good effort richard.
A failed business model from the start. Pegasus has been doing the same thing for 3 decades and it is totally uncompetitive in todays space launch market. I wondered from the start what he was thinking.
It went bankrupt because they have been working on it longer than Space X has even been in existence, and they still couldn't complete it's goals. I kinda like a little eccentricity, but Richard, between this and the fantasy hyperloop fiasco, I can't believe you aren't fully bankrupt. I wish I had 10% of the money that you threw away.
Everyone seems to think it was a bad concept but they should’ve been the low cost leader using that 747. Having a fueled rocket strapped to the side of the 747 is another story.
SpaceX is definitely the big dog on the street, if the day comes when Elon puts SpaceX on the Stock Exchange, I'll be an investor. Another good company is Rocket Lab, they are nowhere near SpaceX, but has potential to be around for a long time and NASA uses them.
A poorly thought out launch system, without a customer. Good riddance. Let's see how long it takes for Spaceship 2 to kill everyone on board, and also go belly up.
It's so hard to get investment for my normal businesses that have a good financial statement and P&L... Meanwhile these people in the West gets billions of dollars of investment without proper due diligence and plain old hunch.... What the heck
That’s the beauty of American capital, more finance capital in America and California than anywhere else in the world. Only in america can a startup get 100s of millions.
He scammed his investors. There was no reason to have a separate orbital launch company except to fleece investors. Branson should’ve been thrown in prison for investor fraud, but he’s basically “too big to arrest” at this point.
what went wrong? the employees are the reason for the failed launch. they did it on purpose. they dont care about reaching space. its "o look what i built now give me millions for while i sit around doing nothing for the rest of my life" now every last employee is fired .
As small launch companies moving to heavier launchers. This company's design is doomed from the start
What happened, Richard....?
Do you need help..?
This goes to show that even the most seasoned of entrepreneurs still have failures. No matter the success or the failure, we must keep learning and moving forward.
Space exploration must be done by state power, this is not any entrepreneurs can afford the spending. Elon will be doomed like him as well!
They wasted so much money
They would buy the most over by expensive material that had limited shelf life, enough to build say 8 rockets and then they would only bud 2 or 3 and would just eat the cost of tossing out the materials they over bought
And 2 launches a year back to back is no good
facepalm
They worked out space ain't real! Very difficult to recover from billions of $ n years of research that turns out to be completely false.
The idea that Virgin Orbit was more flexible, more nimble because they could "launch from anywhere" is a nice marketing story and gives the impression they had hundreds of potential launch pads all around the world because all they needed was an airport runway. But that's marketing spin. In reality, the launch pad wasn't the runway. It was the highly modified 747 carrier aircraft - a flying launchpad - and there was only one of it. Instead of a nimble "launch from anywhere", the reality was the cumbersome "drag your entire launch pad ground infrastructure all around the world". And their concept of operations involved having a crew in close proximity to a fully loaded (and potentially explosive) rocket for several hours, including at rocket ignition. In every other rocket launch in the world, all humans are moved MILES AWAY long before liquid fuels are pumped into the rocket, and definitely during rocket ignition. In Orbit's case, the crew is sitting right on top of the rocket for hours and at the moment of rocket ignition are at most just a few hundred meters away.
It was always a bad business model. And that's without even getting into the flawed economic analysis of the small satellite launch market.
Branson is not a first principles thinker and engineer, he's a marketer so makes sense.
Great breakdown
But we can make planes that drive itself nowadays, then you dont need a crew in the plane
Most of his companies ended up failing. It's just a brand at this point. There is a very long list of the companies that failed with the brand.
LOL. All these comments pretending to be experts are hilarious.
3:44 400M for a small rocket.
For comparison, Falcon Heavy development cost was more than 500M, and that's a heavy rocket.
even if that amount given too us we will send humans to Mars coz our Mars mission successfully get into Mars orbit in its first go or first attempt and total cost is around 73million $ 😂
@@CSAdityaHoon maybe a small constellation of satellites orbiting Mars, but human spaceflight is currently really expensive and much more difficult than just lifeless satellites.
@@1ndragunawan just a approx i tell yess we still need to develop lots of technologically advancement for it and no doubt Elon Musk will be the first who dominating in this race
@@CSAdityaHoon Oh yes he will.
His strategy to the Moon and Mars is simple, make a proven reliable launch system. One that will be achieve lunar or Mars landing within 1 or 2 terms of US presidency.
No sane US president will throw away that chance, to be forever remembered in the same positive tone as Kennedy. Even Trump bet on Elon, and now Biden does too.
I suggest India signed Artemis Accord and purchase a Starship flight to the Moon and Mars, that will accelerate national achievement, and definitely faster than what China will be doing.
This is the strategy of UAE, Saudi Arabia and other countries that signed Artemis Accord.
That was a Heavy Scam idi0t.
Earth is FLAT, Space is FAKE
Sorry it didn't work out Richard, keep going
I was just wondering what happened to this project. This was actually my second favorite project next to SpaceX. It had alot of promise, it really is a good idea. Could have been a good vehicle for launching smaller crewed spacecraft one day. Would be cool to see another company pick this technology up.
There is not even one of u I have met until today and u know me more than i do❤❤🎉🎉
I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this company finally goes out of business.
didn't watch the video - but the answer to the title is Branson's choice for an air launch. Air launching a rocket severely limits the size of the rocket. Basically the launching aircraft replaces the stage 1 of a ground launch. Stage 1 of a ground launch does not suffer the same limitations as an air launch...
This Virgin doing everything from Cola to Airlines to Rockets always confused me. As a consumer I would not choose Virgin products. An obsolete company in my opinion. The super-woke advertisement of Virgin Atlantic finished if off for me.
ISRO also has a proven low cost "BUS" service. There is a lot of competition in this space.
not really just a lot of scammers waiting to take over.
Earth is Flat Space is Fake
ret@rd
nice pun
not a single word on Rocket Lab eating their lunch? :D
Well, the idea of launching commercial satellites from an airplane sounds good until you look at the cost comparisons with more traditional rockets. The versatility of launching everywhere and in every vector may be useful for the military, but the civilian space sector doesn't need that yet. Why bother with that when SpaceX has cheaper launches per kilogram?
the cost is how much tax dollars they can scam you for idi0t.
Space is Fake, Earth is Flat
Excellent,
Virgin Galactic appears to be following a similar trajectory. In space travel, as in any business, success isn’t a matter of “build it, and they will come.” It requires far more than just launching a product. True success lies in solving complex challenges and achieving economies of scale, balancing innovation with sustainable operations.
I do not see this as a failure. This is part of capitalism. Hopefully someone will have a better idea or a better implementation next time. Good effort richard.
A failed business model from the start. Pegasus has been doing the same thing for 3 decades and it is totally uncompetitive in todays space launch market. I wondered from the start what he was thinking.
Big leap back for brand Virgin.
It went bankrupt because they have been working on it longer than Space X has even been in existence, and they still couldn't complete it's goals. I kinda like a little eccentricity, but Richard, between this and the fantasy hyperloop fiasco, I can't believe you aren't fully bankrupt. I wish I had 10% of the money that you threw away.
Everyone seems to think it was a bad concept but they should’ve been the low cost leader using that 747. Having a fueled rocket strapped to the side of the 747 is another story.
Hahahaa what?
They don't even know there are two companies and the second one just had their crew launch successfully.
space cessna launched from cape pasty, cornwall.
Hired former Boeing,…there’s your first mistake.
They don’t have a chance
Spacex is the most successful and innovative space company in the world. Branson and Bezos are minnows in space, they don’t compare.
SpaceX is definitely the big dog on the street, if the day comes when Elon puts SpaceX on the Stock Exchange, I'll be an investor. Another good company is Rocket Lab, they are nowhere near SpaceX, but has potential to be around for a long time and NASA uses them.
SpaceX you mean FakeX Scammer.
Earth is Flat Space is Fake mor0n
LOL. MuskCult MuskCult MuskCult
@@java4653 The person who has achieved more and will achieve more than any human in history, of course I admire Elon Musk.
@@marsspacex6065 what has Elon the Scammer achieved? Besides pretending to be smart to steal you taxes.🐒
A well known chewing gum brand might be interested in those Boeings… 😂
Common sense always tells you anything that has to do with aviation usually ends up bankruptcy 😂
Wow
A poorly thought out launch system, without a customer. Good riddance.
Let's see how long it takes for Spaceship 2 to kill everyone on board, and also go belly up.
Within 10 days!
It's so hard to get investment for my normal businesses that have a good financial statement and P&L... Meanwhile these people in the West gets billions of dollars of investment without proper due diligence and plain old hunch.... What the heck
That’s the beauty of American capital, more finance capital in America and California than anywhere else in the world. Only in america can a startup get 100s of millions.
Still they create companies which allow you to show your ignorance.
Did not have what it takes and most likely does not have the funds to continue.
He has plenty of your tax dollars that he scammed already.
Earth is Flat Space is Fake idi0t
You win some, you lose some.
He should just stick to record sales.
What is the wall and who walks the street and who writes the journal!
Hi, I'm from São Paulo!
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
I know I’m late to the party but R.B looks fresh out of the facelift department ?
Don’t you agreee ?
He scammed his investors.
There was no reason to have a separate orbital launch company except to fleece investors.
Branson should’ve been thrown in prison for investor fraud, but he’s basically “too big to arrest” at this point.
It took 10 years to generate any revenue?
He Scammed you out of your Tax dollars for 10 years idi0t.
Earth is Flat Space is Fake
His thoughts diminished , while worshiping idols , made that false financial game fade right away .
Space doesn’t exist so this all makes sense
Re upload videos😮
Branson is known for failures…Virgin America, Virgin Orbit etc
negative content about richard branson is a cry for attention and a lame story, he is doing a lot to help the world
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Within 71,200 views!
what how? british made an empire on earth so why not give space to america
Branson v/s Elon is the example of businessman v/s an *engineer*
Virgin Galactic is next to go bankrupt.
Johnny CASH
SOONER, OR LATER.....GOD will cut ya down❤
Make vodka
Bullish af
He is still a billionaire
Glad that the posers are starting to die out.
they are all posers🐒No One Goes to Space. Ever.
Earth is Flat Space is Fake
How much did Branson screw out of taxpayers this time?
Never happened. He’s a virgin after all! 😂
Scammer.
superlative richard
Dude is scammer….
*"THE PROTECTOR, OF ROCKET VIRGINITY... RIIIIIIICHAARD BRAAAAANNDSON"*
What went wrong ? They didn't have Elon as their leader.
Musk >>>> Branson
Imagine Russia and China coming to the rescue😂😂
Went WOKE
Ask any freshman and he'll tell you that, when your "Rocket's a Virgin", you can't fly around much.
No one can beat NASA!
actually they can dont be naive
Bad American politics can beat NASA. "We're from the government and we're here to help" President Ronald Reagan
The Firmament Can Ret@rd.
Earth is Flat Space is fake mor0n
UK😅
Just enjoy retirement lol
He will as you pay for it in taxes. idi0t
Earth is Flat Space is Fake
Richard will fly you into fake space!
what went wrong? the employees are the reason for the failed launch. they did it on purpose. they dont care about reaching space. its "o look what i built now give me millions for while i sit around doing nothing for the rest of my life" now every last employee is fired .
LOL. There's nothing as entertaining as the comments when the MuskCult is about.