at the very beginning, he had typos to say 4f electrons protected by 5s and 5p electrons for rare earth element, but I think they should be 6s and 5d electrons.
The angular momentum Lz operator acts on a wave function ( say f ) as the following : -i.hbar.(dow.f/dowphi) = m.hbar.f if f is a real function, we would not get a real eigenvalue ( m is the magnetic quantum number and is real , hbar is real , hence m.hbar is real ) since the i term on the left cannot vanish. The only way this equation is satisfied is if the eigenvalue is zero.
@@shaikwasef6974 Thanks for your explanation, but why would we force the eigenvalue to vanish instead of questioning the validity of the assumption of a real wavefunction? Of course, this goes back to why would a nondegenerate eigenvector of an operator must be real, which I don't quite get.
Excellent man of knowledge and kind human being.
at the very beginning, he had typos to say 4f electrons protected by 5s and 5p electrons for rare earth element, but I think they should be 6s and 5d electrons.
At 10.50,. Its stated that... An imaginary operator acting on a real function gives eigen value equal to zero ?
How ?
It's not the eigenvalue, the expectation value would be zero
@@moglibora why would that vanish again
The angular momentum Lz operator acts on a wave function ( say f ) as the following :
-i.hbar.(dow.f/dowphi) = m.hbar.f
if f is a real function, we would not get a real eigenvalue ( m is the magnetic quantum number and is real , hbar is real , hence m.hbar is real ) since the i term on the left cannot vanish.
The only way this equation is satisfied is if the eigenvalue is zero.
@@shaikwasef6974 Thanks for your explanation, but why would we force the eigenvalue to vanish instead of questioning the validity of the assumption of a real wavefunction? Of course, this goes back to why would a nondegenerate eigenvector of an operator must be real, which I don't quite get.
T and theta are different ?? at 22:21
Theta is nothing but Curie temperature here