FE Exam Review - Dynamics (Kinematics)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 янв 2025

Комментарии •

  • @hamadalsaqqar68
    @hamadalsaqqar68 4 года назад +1

    Very clear explanation and make it really easy. Thanks a lot!

  • @luisguevara4113
    @luisguevara4113 Год назад +2

    Can someone help? I am confuse why we can’t use the constant acceleration formula, v^2=v0^2+ 2a(delS)… it may be that this is NOT constant a, if so what makes it not constant? (The v var being multiplied?) sorry I have 15 years out of school and I am very rusty.

    • @tjweiler
      @tjweiler 11 месяцев назад

      I was wondering the same thing

    • @asfdsdfasdf
      @asfdsdfasdf 2 дня назад

      For it to be constant acceleration, the acceleration given would have to be a single numerical value without any other variables. Constant acceleration equation would be "a = 5", but not a linear equation like "a = 2v + 1" or an exponent function like the one given in the problem.

  • @xzxz1506
    @xzxz1506 8 дней назад

    Hi Faroq, I get what you mean in the video, but how do you know a (the deceleration) is independent of the distance s? This should be the premise for the integration.

    • @directhubfeexam
      @directhubfeexam  6 дней назад +1

      Hi!
      The given acceleration (a) is explicitly a function of the velocity (v). This alone is enough to solve the problem.
      Using the Particle Rectilinear Motion equation from the FE Handbook on page 102, we can express acceleration in terms of velocity (v) and distance (s) as:
      a * ds = v * dv
      Rearranging to isolate the acceleration term:
      a = v * (ds/dv)
      We can then substitute the given expression for acceleration, resulting in:
      -1.5 * v^(1/2) = v * (ds/dv)
      Isolate "ds" and solve, then integrate with respect to velocity to find the total distance (s).

    • @xzxz1506
      @xzxz1506 6 дней назад

      @@directhubfeexam Thank you, this is a great explanation. I'll be taking my fe next week, I'm sure that I'll pass it easily with you help.

    • @directhubfeexam
      @directhubfeexam  6 дней назад +1

      @@xzxz1506 You're very welcome 😁
      Wishing you all the best this week! Don’t forget to take a break the day before the exam. Go in there and crush it!

  • @zaq1525
    @zaq1525 2 года назад

    When we integrate the "S", why didn't it become S^2/2?

    • @directhubfeexam
      @directhubfeexam  2 года назад +1

      I believe in the solution we integrated "dS" not "S". "dS" is the "differential of S". Since integration is the opposite of differenitation, the integral of "dS" simply becomes S.
      I hope that makes sense.

    • @zaq1525
      @zaq1525 2 года назад

      @@directhubfeexam that does make sense. Thank you

    • @directhubfeexam
      @directhubfeexam  2 года назад

      @@zaq1525 You're welcome!

  • @BeatzFresh
    @BeatzFresh 3 года назад

    Awesome videos, Thank you

  • @tjweiler
    @tjweiler 11 месяцев назад

    Why was there no +C after we integrated s at the end?

    • @directhubfeexam
      @directhubfeexam  11 месяцев назад

      Technically, it’s supposed to be there but for almost all dynamics problems we ignore it because it will be ZERO. This is because when the initial velocity V = 6 m/s, the distance S = 0, giving us a constant of integration, C = 0
      snipboard.io/RdcFEk.jpg

    • @tjweiler
      @tjweiler 11 месяцев назад

      @@directhubfeexam Thank you so much for responding!
      So when s=0 and v=6, C = 0.444(6)^3/2-6.532=-0.0066. Is the only reason it's not zero due to rounding errors?

    • @directhubfeexam
      @directhubfeexam  11 месяцев назад +1

      @@tjweilerexactly! It’s a rounding error. I’m glad we cleared this up.

    • @tjweiler
      @tjweiler 11 месяцев назад

      @directhubfeexam thanks for responding! I'm preparing for the FE, and your videos have been really helpful! You're awesome!

    • @directhubfeexam
      @directhubfeexam  11 месяцев назад

      @@tjweiler Thank you very much! I'm really happy to hear this.

  • @ajama9191
    @ajama9191 3 года назад

    Thank you.