@@diegoleonelreyes only M3gan was never made with the intent of being PG-13, it only got that treatment after the film had already gone into post-production.
Finding out that is going to be PG-13 was really no surprise. I had a feeling it was going to be, but I honestly do not mind since the majority of the fan base is technically teens/adults but I have high hopes that this will succeed nonetheless chris!
@@shinichi6235 So are telling me there are more kids in the fandom who didn't know about the first games and came from 2022's FNAF SB than teens and and adults who knows about it since 2014. Seriously?
@@shinichi6235I’ve been a fan since 2015 and im now 13 Im still a kid but im was alive all through out it and plus pg13 is also scary sometimes look at insidious by blumhouse and also they said that this movie will have gory secens and intense scenes , idk which scenes but this movie is gonna be scary I know of it
As much as alot of people will hate the rating, making Freddie's pg13 was the smartest decision that ever could have been made. Considering typically what average age plays the Games, your able to reach a larger target audience and obviously make more money. It made financial sense to do this
That's literally what happened with M3GAN when that movie was coming out. It was going to be R-rated but since she blew up on Tiktok on because of her dance trend she was well known to younger audiences so they cut it down and gave it a PG-13 rating.
What people don’t realize is that the horror in fnaf didn’t come from gore and shock value. It came from the atmosphere and the tension. You felt as if something was always around you and that your not seeing everything. You fear that they could strike any moment. That’s what makes FNAF scary. Also the series was always for a more teen audience anyways
@@jahali1462 I think that’s why people debated on rating and also I think they’ll put it in with creative ways like showing it originally and maybe the kids ghost act as lighting and actually make it so we see him die on the wall with his shadow leting some blood splatter maybe but mainly it keeps it slightly less gruesome we don’t need it to scar people a new exorcist movie is releasing anyway
The springlock scene can still happen cause William can just fall to the floor and struggle with a few gurgle noises and blood leaking out occasionally, kinda similar to the fnaf 3 trailer when Springtrap was struggling.
They could show like an x-Ray view of it. Showing what that would actually entail. They did something like that in the X-Men movies to show how painful Wolverine’s claws are when they exit his hands. That’d be a good work around.
@@pinkanimositygaming yea plus it wouldn't be extremely graphic cause a springlock victim wouldn't even be able to scream so it's just gonna be the suit twitching and squirming with gargled noises
Five nights at Freddy’s has always been an inherently PG-13 series. Sure there’s dark elements and a lot of disturbing lore, but it’s never been overly graphic or filled with gore. It being PG-13 is perfectly fine, I really don’t see the problem most people are having with that
Bite of 83: Boys head crushed by Fredbear Bite 87: Loss of a frontal lobe from the brain 5 Children: Murdered William Afton: Accidentally Spring-locked his insides as he was bleeding Elizabeth Afton: Killed by Circus Baby, her fathers creation PG 13?
Honestly they can do alot with a PG 13 rating, I’m not one of those haters that think it should definitively be rated r but, we’ll have to see how the movie will perform critically and in the box office. I’m predicting a big opening weekend but then it’ll dip down slowly since it’s also on peacock for people who already have it to stream it for free. I would’ve dropped the streaming and just have the fnaf movie exclusively in theatre’s since I think it’ll have an increase.
They don’t need to do shadows for pg13. It’s only intense very showy gore that makes it 18, like saw. They can show the suit and the spring locks stabbing in without it being 18
Here's my take: the FNAF games always went a long way in merely implying or mentioning horrific events without needing to show them in ultra-graphic detail. Like even the springlock scene, as you brought up, can really be sold mostly in the sound design. He's being killed while wearing a giant exoskeleton anyway, so it's not like you'd be able to see more than maybe some blood splatters. My hope is that they can really push that one scene (assuming it will happen). I think being more reserved throughout the rest of the movie will make that moment feel even more satisfying and chilling. Ideally it'd be kind of like Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3, where you have one big scene that REALLY makes use of the rating and leaves a lasting impact.
Don't worry about the age rating. Age ratings are just to put you on notice of what content is in the movie. Worry about if the story, acting, and visuals are good
it could of been better but it was visually entertaining, thought the acting was good from hutcherson and the rest of the cast and the animatronics had that fnaf one feel. cannot complain.
@EMITRAMBOcrad Yeah. To me, it was like the first game, but with more story, lore, ACTION, and character development. That's why I wished the game was more like that.
I think PG-13 FNAF is a really good idea, because it will help them make as much money as they can and allow the entire fanbase to enjoy it. In addition, the FNAF games never explicitly showed any gore so there's really no reason to need extra blood for the movie to be good.
Bite of 83: Boy's head got crushed by Fredbear Bite 87: Loss of his frontal lobe Five Children: Murdered William Afton: Accidentally Spring-locked his insides while bleeding out
@@audax117how much if that was shown outside of 8-bit mini games, fnaf isn’t a hyper excessive gore fest, the horror of fnaf is meant to come from atmosphere, not endless blood and guts flying around
The thing with FNAF is that up until the books started coming out, FNAF was always meant for Teen or PG-13 audiences. What made FNAF so good for me was that instead of showing you what was happening, the event was described to you. So that you would visualize what was happening, which in my opinion makes it more memorable. It didn't really matter to me what the rating was going to be, I was always gonna watch it anyway.
@@Nat3Riv3r have you read them? Just because they’re targeting a teen audience doesn’t mean they aren’t brutal, the deaths throughout the books and even the games are crazy graphic and dark from an employee cutting his face off with a razor blade to disembowelment and dismemberment (of course) As far as FNaF is concerned with the fanbase it’s exactly like the Hunger Games series, those movies with all the source material provided could easily have been rated R, same goes for FNaF, of course the hunger games weren’t rated R because of its audience and FNaF won’t be rated R for the same reason it’s not because it can’t be
Remember everyone, it’s the fan-made content side of FNAF that adds the true gore and horror. No mainline FNAF game has ever shown the level of gore that some fans were hoping for, outside of a retro video game art style.
@@LazarusGamingandDiscussion no it has not if anything it's made things better sorry the Walton files is amazing and does a really good job and that the sort of LC I expect from this movie I am not going to see the movie now all so ruin was not scary at all in fact indound it to be some what boring to be honest
Just because a horror movie is rated PG-13 doesn’t mean it’s gonna be bad, there are a lot of young FNAF fans that really want to watch this movie, and since this movie is finally appropriate for teens, they don’t have too worry about the violence of the movie or the restrictions of there age, so there parents won’t refuse to let them watch the movie.
@@theceoofeggmansempire5214pg doesn't = not scary, less scary maybe but it's a small price to pay so other people can watch it, yk instead of being mad and selfish
For the springlocks scene, I think it would come down to sound design. They can probably get away with showing a little bit of blood, although, we won’t be getting anything too extreme, but I feel like as long as the sounds are visceral, it’ll be just fine
I do agree that the ring was one of the if not the scariest PG-13 movies of all time and that also means that fnaf can potentially do the same but a R rating just seems like a more suitable rating
I was expecting PG-13, and it’s completely fine with me. As a fan of horror games but not really horror movies, I don’t care about the blood and gore. I’m still super excited to see this movie
Ive always been suprised by PG-13 horror films and with the tagline "Strong Violent Content" i think Scott and Blumhouse are still gonna give us some crazy scenes in this movie
if it's a trilogy like some of the contracts for the actors have kinda poked at i bet they do like 2 pg-13 movies and the 3rd being R cause by that point the majority fanbase will be grown up
For the 18+ fans you have to remember that it is created by blum house and scott Cawthon alot of 13+ movies that blum house made is literally so gory 💀 + alot of kid murders or blood and gore can be 13+
It makes sense because there are kids and young audiences that love FNAF. I knew it would be PG-13, you don’t know if they will probably make an Unrated version of the movie just like M3GAN did. We’re just gonna have to wait.
I don't get why people think a pg13 rating is bad. A lot of great horror films have pg13 ratings like "The Ring, Insidious, Happy Death Day, etc. I think people expect this to be like Willys Wonderland, which isnt rated, or the Banana Splits horror movie, which was rated R.
I think it make’s perfect sense for it to be PG-13. I was about 11 or 12 when I first saw Markiplier’s play through & MatPat’s theories on it. I’m. 19 now & I’m just excited that we’re getting this movie at all because for a while it was feeling like an urban legend
Kinda surprised Scott didnt want this to be R rated, because the way he has been planning this movie it never seemed like it was just for engagement. Because yes a pg-13 movie does gain more traction. But the passion Scott had for this movie, having years and years go by,made me feel like he’d go that extra mile to really convey those horror elements in fnaf, not saying that he won’t in the movie since it’s not out yet, but he won’t be able to go as far with this age rating. But I hope he does make an R rated cut in the future for other fans which would be cool to see.
I got introduced to FNAF when I was only 8 or 9 years old and as I got older I started to love FNAF. Now that I'm 15, I'm glad that this movie is PG-13 because I know that I am not aloud to watch R-Rated stuff yet but seeing the FNAF Movie in theaters with a PG-13 rating..... I think this is my first horror movie I saw in movie theaters (without the blood and gore)
The largest demographic of people who follow this series and will be going to see this movie are 10-15, so this rating makes perfect sense. The games didn’t rely on gore to be scary, so you can still make it scary without it being violent.
That's not really the case, that WAS the demographic back in 2014, now the hardcore fans who've stuck with the series since 2014 are adults there's not really any new children just joining the fandom out of nowhere, that being said a PG13 rating is still the best rating for this movies success
@@shadowcastyt I would argue that’s still the demographic, as FNAF has evolved and continued to hit new audiences. If you look at the breakdown of demographics of FNAF channels such as 8BitRyan or Dawko or even Game Theory, I guarantee a large percentage, likely over half, of their audience base is still in that age range
@@TuckerMorgan-i1hthat’s not true at all. people who grew up on the series aren’t the only ones left in the fan base and kids are still finding out about those old games these days because they’re just that popular and still talked about to this day. as someone who grew up with fnaf since 2014 my lil brother and my lil cousins are all into the old fnaf games and old fnaf songs they listen tf out of it and they’re the same age i was when i found out about fnaf when i was 8.
to be fair a lot of pg13 movies have surprisingly brutal moments in them (like all the messed up shit that happens in guardians 3) you can kinda get away with one or two r rated ish moments on a pg13 movie, the springtrap scene could be one of those
Chris they can still show all the blood and gore. It doesn’t need to be rated R just to show that. Spring lock failure is gonna happen. The fnaf movie is gonna be strong pg-13 movie.
@Crepis it's gonna be labelled as 12A in the UK. This means that anyone under the age of 12 still can go as long as they are with an adult. Edit: It's going to be a 15 in the UK.
I think there could be an unrated cut. There are many pg 13 movies that have had to cut certain scenes because they deemed too violent to get that pg 13 rating.
I think PG-13 makes sense, I had a feeling this would be the rating. There’s all ready a lot you could do with PG-13, but there’s a lot more you could do with an R rating. Either way I’m hyped for this movie
It being PG-13 is a smart move. The kids who play fnaf can watch it, while also being somewhat bloody for older fans. Plus fnaf is rated T, so it evens out
“since it’s PG13 it’s gonna be kid friendly!” oh really? pg-13 movies can be violent, bloody, & gory. see watch me go on this spree of films like that -old -a quiet place, a quiet place 2 -truth or dare -SOME of the insidious films -meg -the invitation -fall -king kong -dark knight -the impossible -scary movie 3, 4, & 5 -that one star wars movie when anakin catches on fire -the ring -anddd lots more edit: 2:51 literally me rn lmao 😭💀
I do believe Blumhouse will definitely push the limits! I mean honestly, as long as the story telling is good, I’m very happy. I could see a potential “unrated” cut, but again, in the games there really isn’t much gore
Yeah, I don’t get why people are so upset! We’ve been waiting for this movie for what, like 8 years? And there trying to cancel it as much as they can 😂
@@TheFrogthat_SLAYSit's because we've been waiting all those years only to be met with toddler FNAF. The kids who grew up and followed this series since 2014 are all adults now and want to see the carnage they could only imagine happen on screen. The movie has been in development a long time, and many folks don't feel like they're gonna get what they were waiting so long for exactly.
@@aubergineman3205 but pg13 can still have a lot of gruesome moments, and I don’t think it’s going to go soft on the movie. But I don’t think it needs to be REALLY gory. And I’m just happy we’re getting a movie.
@@aubergineman3205 I think they are really pushing the PG-13 rating based on what its rated PG-13 for, its not going to be a gore-fest slasher like something like sleepy hollow would be.
fnaf has never been the type of franchise that needed the over the top violence. it just needs the creep factor and story to be good cause to me, seeing the eye hanging from Freddy's socket through a camera is way better that seeing someone get torn in half by Bonnie's super robot hands. so it being PG is actually a good thing in my opinion.
For those people who can't understand why a movie is PG-13 Because Scott Cawthon wants a movie follow original age rating that always been there since very beginning of FNAF Franchise. *13+* It's a age rating that always follow both game series and Novel series
Personally, I am SO GLAD THAT IT ISNT RATED R! I’ve watched R rated horror before, and not ONCE DID I GET SCARED WHEN IT WAS FROM GORE/Other stuff :/ I FREAKING RAN TO THE BATHROOM TO THROW UP I hate gore bc it makes me literally sick. So happy rn.
When people say PG-13 horror movies can't be good, just remember these films: The Ring, The Grudge, A Quiet Place, A Quiet Place Part II, Insidious, The Boy, Mama, M3gan, The Skeleton Key, Lights Out, The Others, Signs, Prom Night, Tremors, Drag Me to Hell, Poltergeist (The Remake), The Mothman Prophesies, Cloverfield, World War Z, The Haunting, Shutter, Troll Hunter, The Final Girls, Maggie, Warm Bodies, Ouija: Origin of Evil, Before I Wake, When a Stranger Calls, and The Sixth Sense.
I think it’s fine since the FNAF games don’t feel rated R anyway Also what Chris said about the books being made for kids those books (specifically fazbear frights) are really dark
I feel like we are all kind of expecting it, so I don’t really care. I’m just surprised how many people are mad but the most blood that we seen in the game is pixel, lysed blood so you can’t really expect much I am thinking they’re going to do what they did with M3gan and later make a rated R version.
The only thing to me seeming like it could have a hard time being in a pg 13 movie would be spring locks, but I don't get why everyone thinks the movie 100% needs to be rated r. For example the new security breach dlc came out, and Eben though it had no gore it still felt scarier than the main security breach game we got a year and a half ago
I loved that you used my idea of the silhouette on the wall…it made smile when you mentioned it cause I remember mentioning it in the trailer breakdown and one of the last FNAF videos. Love you Chris!!!!
There are PG-13 movies that make things scarier because it isn’t Rated R and you don’t see everything. The springlock scene could be so horrifying because it’s PG-13. You don’t have to see everything, but what you see could be terrifying when you leave your imagination to fill the gaps.
As long as the story stays in its high quality range im fine with that, because a good horror movie needs a good story, you can have a very violent and gory horror film but it could have bad writing and story while you can have a not so gory and violent film yet you have an amazing story.
Yeah FNAF is infamous for having an extremely graphic and disturbing story that receives zero gorey details, and more child-friendly cover ups. It doesn't address or delve into its background because that would be too adult-orientated. Still really fucking irritating though ngl. I'll still watch it, and I think we all knew it was going to be PG13. I hope the wait was worth it for everyone, *especially* for the now-adults.
I think the reason for this is because most (or at least some) of the fandom are mostly kids 9 - 13,14. I think it's a great idea to make FNAF pg- 13. Plus, there are great PG-13 horror movies, like Insidious, and A Quiet Place. Looking forward to this movie
I am kind of annoyed by this. While PG-13 can still be violent and dark, I just really wanted to see a spring-lock failure in live action. And while action/dramas are usually more violent in PG-13 settings, horror movies like M3GAN are notoriously censored for PG-13 cuts. Fun fact btw, this was made by the producer of M3GAN, so all my hope of a serious fnaf movie is lost...
I thought the games were targeted towards kids and teens? Making it R would cut out a large chunk of the audience. Besides, M3gan made it clear PG-13 can work perfectly for something like this.
I got to agree with you on everything you said, I mean I’m just happy that we are getting a movie for this Franchise as it always felt like it deserved to have its own movie and no we are finally getting sure it’s PG 13 but that doesn’t change anything sure it may not show as much gore as some people would like but that’s ok, the main thing is that they get a great and fun and scary movie out which recaptures the vibe of the games and that they have good character arcs for our heroes and villains.
I am aware of fnaf basics but I have only played the security breach game myself (minus playing the old ones in school with friends). My take on this is that the games ratings were never 18+ and neither did they show any gore so making the film a 13+ makes sense. The games rely in suspense, design and jumpscares to get that 'horror' rating so as long as the movie follows that then it is technically accurate and targets the audience it was originally for.
As an adult FNAF fan, I am honestly glad to hear that it has a PG-13 rating. It’s really going to open up the movie to so many more audiences that wouldn’t see it otherwise.
As someone who’ll be 14 by the time the movie releases, I’m really glad to hear that it’s PG-13 as well, so I can watch it and spot all the references, and without waiting for it to be released in stores
@@firstnamelastname956that kid fan base has long gone like me im 13 almost turning 14 and making the movie pg13 can let the now grown up and more matured fanbase actually have a reason to watch it and blumhouse makes better sales and hopefully completing the 3 part movie deal blumhouse signed for
Well to be fair, Scott has always pleased his audience, so I’d imagine he could find a loophole to make the movie as violent as possible for the matured audience
I'm fine with this. We don't need a gory and depressingly serious movie, this one is trying to be a bit more light hearted and fun while still being scary.
I find it kinda annoying, but predictable. We've been waiting for years, we're grown up now. We want to see something more fitting for us- the people who waited almost a decade for this. I hope that it uses its rating well, though, and that we all didn't wait years for some cheesy, overly kid-friendly money grabber. I'm still glad we're getting a movie at all though. I hope it comes out scary.
I think the spring lock scene could be completely shown while still maintaining PG-13, on paper, it’s just metal and crunching noises, William going stiff, some funny red juice, and screaming. If they can get away with child ‘slaying’, they can get away with doing the spring lock scene.
@@EliRetroVHS642"that's disgusting" It's FNAF. If we don't see some kind of visual of children being murdered how am I supposed to take it seriously? I want to feel bad for wronged kids not laugh because they completely skip it over.
As long as we get a unrated version or something like a director's cut will be good cause m3gan has a unrated version on peacock and it a lot better than the one we got in theaters. But both versions are good
It honestly makes sense to be pg13 because no one ever saw the kids being murdered, they were lured away by William in a spring Bonnie suit and murdered but no one saw it so I think that would be the only reason we would see blood in THIS movie
4:20 For the Springlock failure scene, it will most likely, like he kind of said, just toned down a bit. I think it will either be off screen, hearing screaming, or like 3C said.
see now I'm a kid cause I'm only 12, but I still liked FNaF for like 5 to 6 years, also I still watch a bunch more horror movies with gore and all that, but now I feel like people are just being plain rude now on tiktok and other apps. It's just outta hand now, some people just have to accept that people like something.
People also forget that World War Z and Happy Death Day and Cloverfield was PG13. Even though it has a PG13 rating, it still has potential to be pretty bloody and scary
I’m actually glad they did, it was a really smart choice. I’m speaking for the younger audience (I’m a teen) I have a lot of friends that are into the lore and fnaf. So making it this rating will lead to a lot more people watching it. This will also help me to understand the lore better (help everyone really). I think what everyone wanted to see was the spring lock and Afton on his killing spree
Yk all movies should be rated pg 13 because if a child dares to watch it then he obviously doing it out of free will because fnaf movie with also the games being genuinely Gordy and scary the kid knows about fnaf and has likely played the game before so he will not be frightened by the game Edit : mom I have 69’420 likes
@@LowTierMarstonecause it’s a game about dead children being shoved in animatronic suits, and people having their entire body’s mutilated by millions of tiny robotic pieces. People have their frontal lobes torn our by huge bears. That’s some pretty heavy stuff, and that’s just a tiny piece of it.
@@nucygnet5881 most of the FNAF games shows a little bit of blood or the jumps scares look like it can show blood. Night one of FNAF 1, phone guy was talking about the bite of 83. And the bite of 83 had blood in the game.
@@MonkeyMan90.5 here's the thing though, pretty much non of that is ever shown, the majority of it is all told and implied and when it is shown it's in minigame form or just red on the screen.
Let’s be real, just hearing the victim of the animatronics and knowing what the animatronics are doing can cause the human mind to think of the most disturbing scenes, far more disturbing than whatever can be put on the big screen. Imagination can be more effective than viewing it
I cannot fathom the delusions of people who thought this movie was going to be rated R. Just even after seeing the trailers, how is there people who still thought this? The franchise implies a lot of dark things, but has always been very kid friendly. People who are actually upset about this are either 12 or just not familiar with the franchise.
It’s the vhs tapes that’s what they think FNaF is like don’t get me wrong those vhs tapes are really well made but so many people have let those videos distort their view of what FNaF is it’s not gonna be watered down it’s gonna not be overdone
@@theceoofeggmansempire5214 they exist. There’s plenty of movies and shows that fall into the category of horror and are still for kids. Goosebumps, scary stories to tell in the dark, monster House, Coraline, anything by Tim burton. Not everything horror related has to have extreme blood and guts. And it’s good that there are things like this that open up the genre to kids, because it would be worse if a nine-year-old was introduced to horror with a movie like saw, or Halloween.
Another reason its PG-13 is so they can make money off of it. If its Rated-R then only older people will go see it since most parents wouldn't let their kids see it.
![Cody Johnson - I'm Gonna Love You (with Carrie Underwood) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yy9PuYMU29g/mqdefault.jpg)
I don’t think it was ever going to be R rated but an unrated cut is definitely something I’d want to see
Yeah.
It’s gonna be 15+. I wanna see something scary and gory and horrific, like the story really is.
@@Thebluegyif they make it gory/fucking scary, it’ll be a proper scare for sure.
Yeah that will happen cause if M3GAN had a unrated version In peacock back then
@@diegoleonelreyes only M3gan was never made with the intent of being PG-13, it only got that treatment after the film had already gone into post-production.
Finding out that is going to be PG-13 was really no surprise. I had a feeling it was going to be, but I honestly do not mind since the majority of the fan base is technically teens/adults but I have high hopes that this will succeed nonetheless chris!
Agree
Nah it’s mostly kids and kids who weren’t alive when the first game came out
@@shinichi6235 So are telling me there are more kids in the fandom who didn't know about the first games and came from 2022's FNAF SB than teens and and adults who knows about it since 2014. Seriously?
@@shinichi6235I’ve been a fan since 2015 and im now 13 Im still a kid but im was alive all through out it and plus pg13 is also scary sometimes look at insidious by blumhouse and also they said that this movie will have gory secens and intense scenes , idk which scenes but this movie is gonna be scary I know of it
@@shinichi6235I been a fan since 2014 and I'm still a kid
As much as alot of people will hate the rating, making Freddie's pg13 was the smartest decision that ever could have been made. Considering typically what average age plays the Games, your able to reach a larger target audience and obviously make more money. It made financial sense to do this
yeah I agree with this
The focus on finances usually ruins a film. If the sole reason of this rating is because of money then it won’t be a good movie.
That's literally what happened with M3GAN when that movie was coming out.
It was going to be R-rated but since she blew up on Tiktok on because of her dance trend she was well known to younger audiences so they cut it down and gave it a PG-13 rating.
@@doomer5688You realize that’s what movies are for, right? To make money.
@@Sir_Shark06what about entertainment
What people don’t realize is that the horror in fnaf didn’t come from gore and shock value. It came from the atmosphere and the tension. You felt as if something was always around you and that your not seeing everything. You fear that they could strike any moment. That’s what makes FNAF scary. Also the series was always for a more teen audience anyways
Look man I just wanna see a live action spring lock failure
@@jahali1462 just remember that the Jurassic park/world and jaws movies were given ratings under r and still got away with some violent stuff
@@jahali1462 I think that’s why people debated on rating and also I think they’ll put it in with creative ways like showing it originally and maybe the kids ghost act as lighting and actually make it so we see him die on the wall with his shadow leting some blood splatter maybe but mainly it keeps it slightly less gruesome we don’t need it to scar people a new exorcist movie is releasing anyway
People just were expecting a springlock failure scene
FRRRRRR
The springlock scene can still happen cause William can just fall to the floor and struggle with a few gurgle noises and blood leaking out occasionally, kinda similar to the fnaf 3 trailer when Springtrap was struggling.
They could show like an x-Ray view of it. Showing what that would actually entail. They did something like that in the X-Men movies to show how painful Wolverine’s claws are when they exit his hands. That’d be a good work around.
@@pinkanimositygaming yea plus it wouldn't be extremely graphic cause a springlock victim wouldn't even be able to scream so it's just gonna be the suit twitching and squirming with gargled noises
Five nights at Freddy’s has always been an inherently PG-13 series. Sure there’s dark elements and a lot of disturbing lore, but it’s never been overly graphic or filled with gore. It being PG-13 is perfectly fine, I really don’t see the problem most people are having with that
Bite of 83: Boys head crushed by Fredbear
Bite 87: Loss of a frontal lobe from the brain
5 Children: Murdered
William Afton: Accidentally Spring-locked his insides as he was bleeding
Elizabeth Afton: Killed by Circus Baby, her fathers creation
PG 13?
@@THEJefftheKiller okay and how much of that was shown in immense gorey detail and not 8-bit mini games
@@THEJefftheKilleryeah but they imply it but don’t SHOW it
Honestly they can do alot with a PG 13 rating,
I’m not one of those haters that think it should definitively be rated r but,
we’ll have to see how the movie will perform critically and in the box office.
I’m predicting a big opening weekend but then it’ll dip down slowly
since it’s also on peacock for people who already have it to stream it for free.
I would’ve dropped the streaming and just have the fnaf movie exclusively in theatre’s since I think it’ll have an increase.
True facts,
Chris’ face at 2:56 was scarier than any Fnaf jump scare
Lol true
I’m dying 😂
I think it could still be pretty good with some loopholes they could use with like shadows for the spring locks would still horrify people
That would go crazy that'd give me chills..
They don’t need to do shadows for pg13. It’s only intense very showy gore that makes it 18, like saw. They can show the suit and the spring locks stabbing in without it being 18
I really dont want them too. All i wanted was a graphic live action depiction of williams spring lock failure....sigh
@@payt00nthe fans can always do it better
@@aubergineman3205 for sure just search up springlock faiulure vhs tape or somethin you'll see some gory stuff
Here's my take: the FNAF games always went a long way in merely implying or mentioning horrific events without needing to show them in ultra-graphic detail. Like even the springlock scene, as you brought up, can really be sold mostly in the sound design. He's being killed while wearing a giant exoskeleton anyway, so it's not like you'd be able to see more than maybe some blood splatters.
My hope is that they can really push that one scene (assuming it will happen). I think being more reserved throughout the rest of the movie will make that moment feel even more satisfying and chilling. Ideally it'd be kind of like Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3, where you have one big scene that REALLY makes use of the rating and leaves a lasting impact.
I think if they do make a scene really bad, it would probably be the scene where the kids get murdered.
Don't worry about the age rating. Age ratings are just to put you on notice of what content is in the movie.
Worry about if the story, acting, and visuals are good
it could of been better but it was visually entertaining, thought the acting was good from hutcherson and the rest of the cast and the animatronics had that fnaf one feel. cannot complain.
@EMITRAMBOcrad Yeah. To me, it was like the first game, but with more story, lore, ACTION, and character development. That's why I wished the game was more like that.
I think PG-13 FNAF is a really good idea, because it will help them make as much money as they can and allow the entire fanbase to enjoy it. In addition, the FNAF games never explicitly showed any gore so there's really no reason to need extra blood for the movie to be good.
Exactly. The games (especially the first one) was based around suspense and the unknown.
As the consumer, all that matters is if the film is good or not.
I definitely agree
Bite of 83: Boy's head got crushed by Fredbear
Bite 87: Loss of his frontal lobe
Five Children: Murdered
William Afton: Accidentally Spring-locked his insides while bleeding out
@@audax117how much if that was shown outside of 8-bit mini games, fnaf isn’t a hyper excessive gore fest, the horror of fnaf is meant to come from atmosphere, not endless blood and guts flying around
The thing with FNAF is that up until the books started coming out, FNAF was always meant for Teen or PG-13 audiences. What made FNAF so good for me was that instead of showing you what was happening, the event was described to you. So that you would visualize what was happening, which in my opinion makes it more memorable. It didn't really matter to me what the rating was going to be, I was always gonna watch it anyway.
That's a fair take… but you can't read the books and say the series is PG13 the book content has some crazy brutal events in them
The books are like seventh grade level
@@shadowcastyt I saw FNaF books at my book fair in school not that long ago. (I was in 8th grade in a pre-k-8 school)
@@Nat3Riv3r have you read them? Just because they’re targeting a teen audience doesn’t mean they aren’t brutal, the deaths throughout the books and even the games are crazy graphic and dark from an employee cutting his face off with a razor blade to disembowelment and dismemberment (of course)
As far as FNaF is concerned with the fanbase it’s exactly like the Hunger Games series, those movies with all the source material provided could easily have been rated R, same goes for FNaF, of course the hunger games weren’t rated R because of its audience and FNaF won’t be rated R for the same reason it’s not because it can’t be
as somebody who straight up lacks the ability to visualize i prefer show dont tell
Remember everyone, it’s the fan-made content side of FNAF that adds the true gore and horror. No mainline FNAF game has ever shown the level of gore that some fans were hoping for, outside of a retro video game art style.
Exactly. Analog horror has done irreparable damage to the FNAF community
@@LazarusGamingandDiscussion no it has not if anything it's made things better sorry the Walton files is amazing and does a really good job and that the sort of LC I expect from this movie I am not going to see the movie now all so ruin was not scary at all in fact indound it to be some what boring to be honest
@@brightlights2489honestly, the PG-13 rating fits on how your acting.
@@brightlights2489the walten files were just “omg look at this scary imagery!!!!!” you’re giving that mid series way more credit that it should have
@@LazarusGamingandDiscussion it has saved the community from being too kid-friendly and keeps the spirit of fnaf alive
Man really disappointed that we’re not gonna see the chica shower scenes 🤦♂️
I’m sure in time they will make an R-rated film. And if they don’t, a fan will.
maybe the sequel will be R since it will have spring trap and other stuff in it
@@Wii07ENTERTAINMENTIt depends if the film does good enough, But when the movie comes out they might release a rated version just like M3gan
@@Writer_Of_Storytellingtrue
@@Writer_Of_Storytelling'm pretty sure that's what's going to happen. Hopefully.
I’m pretty sure the RUclipsr Battington is already making a fan film that’s R rated
I am not really mad that it’s pg 13 I just want a good movie
A good movie? Have you seen the trailer? You're not getting a good movie.
@@gd7022fr
Bruh, I bet he didn't watch the trailer, rewatch it then you will think it will be good.
its Hollywood bro you aint getting a good story lmaooooo
@@gd7022The trailer was changed from red red to yellow eyes
Just because a horror movie is rated PG-13 doesn’t mean it’s gonna be bad, there are a lot of young FNAF fans that really want to watch this movie, and since this movie is finally appropriate for teens, they don’t have too worry about the violence of the movie or the restrictions of there age, so there parents won’t refuse to let them watch the movie.
If the rating is this low then it shows how little of horror it has. Therefore it's not gonna be scary, then why waste time making it?
@@theceoofeggmansempire5214 The ring was pg-13 and it was a great scary movie
@@theceoofeggmansempire5214insidious is pg-13 and is scary
@@orlaith_2910but this is fnaf. not insidious
@@theceoofeggmansempire5214pg doesn't = not scary, less scary maybe but it's a small price to pay so other people can watch it, yk instead of being mad and selfish
Something I love about Chris's content is that when he covers movie news he also gives his opinion on it as opposed to just reading news from a script
For the springlocks scene, I think it would come down to sound design. They can probably get away with showing a little bit of blood, although, we won’t be getting anything too extreme, but I feel like as long as the sounds are visceral, it’ll be just fine
The Ring was PG-13?!?! 😱 That was the scariest PG-13 movie I’ve seen when I was a kid! 😳
True, but FNAF isn't going to be scary movie, its gonna to be a corny fun movie.
@@yousefgus727I hope it's scary and corny, kinda like the evil dead movies
@@SmokeyMarshmallows Not sure about that though, we hadn't really seen anything scary from the film yet, it won't be too scary I think.
@@SmokeyMarshmallows cringe
I do agree that the ring was one of the if not the scariest PG-13 movies of all time and that also means that fnaf can potentially do the same but a R rating just seems like a more suitable rating
I was expecting PG-13, and it’s completely fine with me. As a fan of horror games but not really horror movies, I don’t care about the blood and gore. I’m still super excited to see this movie
Ive always been suprised by PG-13 horror films and with the tagline "Strong Violent Content" i think Scott and Blumhouse are still gonna give us some crazy scenes in this movie
It feels kinda like the batman weirdly enough? Like it’s pg13 but hella dark that it touches the line of r rated
if it's a trilogy like some of the contracts for the actors have kinda poked at i bet they do like 2 pg-13 movies and the 3rd being R cause by that point the majority fanbase will be grown up
For the 18+ fans you have to remember that it is created by blum house and scott Cawthon alot of 13+ movies that blum house made is literally so gory 💀 + alot of kid murders or blood and gore can be 13+
fr fr
I’m honestly glad it’s it fits Fnaf, but don’t get me wrong I think a rated R Fnaf movie sounds cool, but PG-13 fits better!
I can see it being an intense PG-13, I could never see it being R, fnaf in itself is geared towards a more younger audience
It makes sense because there are kids and young audiences that love FNAF. I knew it would be PG-13, you don’t know if they will probably make an Unrated version of the movie just like M3GAN did. We’re just gonna have to wait.
I don't get why people think a pg13 rating is bad. A lot of great horror films have pg13 ratings like "The Ring, Insidious, Happy Death Day, etc. I think people expect this to be like Willys Wonderland, which isnt rated, or the Banana Splits horror movie, which was rated R.
IDC IF IT'S PG-13 IT WILL BE THE BEST MOVIE IN HISTORY
Doesn’t Bother Me Because Blumhouse Is Known For Sometimes Making PG-13 Movies. Also If Anyone Wants An R Rated FNAF Movie, Watch Willys Wonderland
Willy’s Wonderland was a great movie imo
Why did you capitalize every word
@@LiquidSteel_04i was about to ask that
Willy's wonderland? Bro that shit's just an ass FNAF copy!
I WANT THE ACTUAL FREDDY FAZBEAR TO CRUSH SOMEONE'S SKULL IN WITH HIS BEAR HANDS!
@@TeeJack_1No it's not
Haunting movies are fine with being pg13 and I always thought of fnaf as more of a haunting type story especially if you only go off of gameplay
I think it make’s perfect sense for it to be PG-13. I was about 11 or 12 when I first saw Markiplier’s play through & MatPat’s theories on it. I’m. 19 now & I’m just excited that we’re getting this movie at all because for a while it was feeling like an urban legend
I was 7 or 8 when I watched Markiplier’s gameplay in 2014.
I was 10 or 11.
I've loved it ever since
I was 9 when fnaf came out
I REALLY hope there IS an unrated or R rated cut for streaming...
Kinda surprised Scott didnt want this to be R rated, because the way he has been planning this movie it never seemed like it was just for engagement. Because yes a pg-13 movie does gain more traction. But the passion Scott had for this movie, having years and years go by,made me feel like he’d go that extra mile to really convey those horror elements in fnaf, not saying that he won’t in the movie since it’s not out yet, but he won’t be able to go as far with this age rating. But I hope he does make an R rated cut in the future for other fans which would be cool to see.
I got introduced to FNAF when I was only 8 or 9 years old and as I got older I started to love FNAF. Now that I'm 15, I'm glad that this movie is PG-13 because I know that I am not aloud to watch R-Rated stuff yet but seeing the FNAF Movie in theaters with a PG-13 rating..... I think this is my first horror movie I saw in movie theaters (without the blood and gore)
In the UK it’s a 15 and I’m nearly 14 so I probably cant watch it and I will probably have to watch it on peacock
I’m 14, same for me 😁
Blood and gore is allowed but not much
The largest demographic of people who follow this series and will be going to see this movie are 10-15, so this rating makes perfect sense. The games didn’t rely on gore to be scary, so you can still make it scary without it being violent.
Yeah there is scary pg-13 movies quiet place etc
That's not really the case, that WAS the demographic back in 2014, now the hardcore fans who've stuck with the series since 2014 are adults there's not really any new children just joining the fandom out of nowhere, that being said a PG13 rating is still the best rating for this movies success
@@shadowcastyt I would argue that’s still the demographic, as FNAF has evolved and continued to hit new audiences. If you look at the breakdown of demographics of FNAF channels such as 8BitRyan or Dawko or even Game Theory, I guarantee a large percentage, likely over half, of their audience base is still in that age range
@@shadowcastyt dude there’s still 10-15 today who loves this franchise
@@TuckerMorgan-i1hthat’s not true at all. people who grew up on the series aren’t the only ones left in the fan base and kids are still finding out about those old games these days because they’re just that popular and still talked about to this day. as someone who grew up with fnaf since 2014 my lil brother and my lil cousins are all into the old fnaf games and old fnaf songs they listen tf out of it and they’re the same age i was when i found out about fnaf when i was 8.
I hope there's a unrated/rated R cut somewhere! If not on Peacock, hopefully it will be attached to the digital release or something.
YESS
to be fair a lot of pg13 movies have surprisingly brutal moments in them (like all the messed up shit that happens in guardians 3) you can kinda get away with one or two r rated ish moments on a pg13 movie, the springtrap scene could be one of those
Chris they can still show all the blood and gore. It doesn’t need to be rated R just to show that. Spring lock failure is gonna happen. The fnaf movie is gonna be strong pg-13 movie.
We all knew this was comin. Whoever is upset just gotta deal with it lol
The games were never 18+ so PG -13 actually makes sense.
Yes you are right people need to realize that 13+ means that people under that age can’t watch the movie
@Crepis it's gonna be labelled as 12A in the UK. This means that anyone under the age of 12 still can go as long as they are with an adult.
Edit: It's going to be a 15 in the UK.
isnt that for every movie ever?@@1nkT1tan
I think there could be an unrated cut. There are many pg 13 movies that have had to cut certain scenes because they deemed too violent to get that pg 13 rating.
Why does it look like Freddy’s got a who’ll ass unibrow in the thumbnail 😭😂
They could just do what Deadpool did just revers reales the pg-13 ver and then the rated R ver
0:20 I’m sorry, but that hilarious dance you made literally made me laugh so hard 😂😂😂
I think PG-13 makes sense, I had a feeling this would be the rating. There’s all ready a lot you could do with PG-13, but there’s a lot more you could do with an R rating. Either way I’m hyped for this movie
It being PG-13 is a smart move. The kids who play fnaf can watch it, while also being somewhat bloody for older fans. Plus fnaf is rated T, so it evens out
“since it’s PG13 it’s gonna be kid friendly!” oh really? pg-13 movies can be violent, bloody, & gory. see watch me go on this spree of films like that
-old
-a quiet place, a quiet place 2
-truth or dare
-SOME of the insidious films
-meg
-the invitation
-fall
-king kong
-dark knight
-the impossible
-scary movie 3, 4, & 5
-that one star wars movie when anakin catches on fire
-the ring
-anddd lots more
edit: 2:51 literally me rn lmao 😭💀
I do believe Blumhouse will definitely push the limits! I mean honestly, as long as the story telling is good, I’m very happy. I could see a potential “unrated” cut, but again, in the games there really isn’t much gore
Yeah, I don’t get why people are so upset! We’ve been waiting for this movie for what, like 8 years? And there trying to cancel it as much as they can 😂
@@TheFrogthat_SLAYSit's because we've been waiting all those years only to be met with toddler FNAF.
The kids who grew up and followed this series since 2014 are all adults now and want to see the carnage they could only imagine happen on screen.
The movie has been in development a long time, and many folks don't feel like they're gonna get what they were waiting so long for exactly.
@@aubergineman3205 but pg13 can still have a lot of gruesome moments, and I don’t think it’s going to go soft on the movie. But I don’t think it needs to be REALLY gory. And I’m just happy we’re getting a movie.
@@aubergineman3205 I think they are really pushing the PG-13 rating based on what its rated PG-13 for, its not going to be a gore-fest slasher like something like sleepy hollow would be.
fnaf has never been the type of franchise that needed the over the top violence. it just needs the creep factor and story to be good cause to me, seeing the eye hanging from Freddy's socket through a camera is way better that seeing someone get torn in half by Bonnie's super robot hands. so it being PG is actually a good thing in my opinion.
For those people who can't understand why a movie is PG-13
Because Scott Cawthon wants a movie follow original age rating that always been there since very beginning of FNAF Franchise.
*13+* It's a age rating that always follow both game series and Novel series
It was going to be pg-13 anyway
Originally, I was mostly here for the gore but now I kind of lost track and now I’m here for the good story and characters.
What gore? Lol
@@campfunkokoda3419 I'm assuming he joined through fanmade content
@@campfunkokoda3419remember the eyes popping out in the FNAF 1 game over screen?
"What gore?"
Oh I don't know...
@@aubergineman3205tbh thats still not really gore its just eyeballs people see them all the time
@@aubergineman3205 I mean the FNAF 1 game over screen wasn't really gory.
I was hoping for an r rating but i have faith in Blumhouse to still make this scary
Same i trust them
Honestly, after waiting years for this movie, I’m not fussed about this movies age rating. Just happy we’re finally getting it
Rob Schneider must be in it
Personally, I am SO GLAD THAT IT ISNT RATED R! I’ve watched R rated horror before, and not ONCE DID I GET SCARED WHEN IT WAS FROM GORE/Other stuff :/ I FREAKING RAN TO THE BATHROOM TO THROW UP
I hate gore bc it makes me literally sick. So happy rn.
When people say PG-13 horror movies can't be good, just remember these films: The Ring, The Grudge, A Quiet Place, A Quiet Place Part II, Insidious, The Boy, Mama, M3gan, The Skeleton Key, Lights Out, The Others, Signs, Prom Night, Tremors, Drag Me to Hell, Poltergeist (The Remake), The Mothman Prophesies, Cloverfield, World War Z, The Haunting, Shutter, Troll Hunter, The Final Girls, Maggie, Warm Bodies, Ouija: Origin of Evil, Before I Wake, When a Stranger Calls, and The Sixth Sense.
Huh didn’t know wwz was PG-13
Warm Bodies was a more comedic love story even though there were zombies.
I think it’s fine since the FNAF games don’t feel rated R anyway
Also what Chris said about the books being made for kids those books (specifically fazbear frights) are really dark
You can get away with a lot in PG-13 and still be scary. Both Lights Out and Insidious are terrifying and PG-13
Honestly, the forst Conjurng move could’ve almost been PG-13 instead of R
I feel like we are all kind of expecting it, so I don’t really care. I’m just surprised how many people are mad but the most blood that we seen in the game is pixel, lysed blood so you can’t really expect much I am thinking they’re going to do what they did with M3gan and later make a rated R version.
Never mind forget the m3gan I gust finished the video 😭
Five nights at Freddy's the movie is PG-13 five nights at Freddy's the movie 2 PG-13 and five nights at Freddy's the movie 3 rated R😮😮😮 cool🎉🎉🎉🎉
The only thing to me seeming like it could have a hard time being in a pg 13 movie would be spring locks, but I don't get why everyone thinks the movie 100% needs to be rated r. For example the new security breach dlc came out, and Eben though it had no gore it still felt scarier than the main security breach game we got a year and a half ago
I loved that you used my idea of the silhouette on the wall…it made smile when you mentioned it cause I remember mentioning it in the trailer breakdown and one of the last FNAF videos. Love you Chris!!!!
There are PG-13 movies that make things scarier because it isn’t Rated R and you don’t see everything. The springlock scene could be so horrifying because it’s PG-13. You don’t have to see everything, but what you see could be terrifying when you leave your imagination to fill the gaps.
As long as the story stays in its high quality range im fine with that, because a good horror movie needs a good story, you can have a very violent and gory horror film but it could have bad writing and story while you can have a not so gory and violent film yet you have an amazing story.
Yeah.
Yeah FNAF is infamous for having an extremely graphic and disturbing story that receives zero gorey details, and more child-friendly cover ups. It doesn't address or delve into its background because that would be too adult-orientated.
Still really fucking irritating though ngl. I'll still watch it, and I think we all knew it was going to be PG13. I hope the wait was worth it for everyone, *especially* for the now-adults.
I think the reason for this is because most (or at least some) of the fandom are mostly kids 9 - 13,14. I think it's a great idea to make FNAF pg- 13. Plus, there are great PG-13 horror movies, like Insidious, and A Quiet Place. Looking forward to this movie
Ouija: origin of evil is another good PG-13 horror.
@@nickdorenkamp959 I haven't heard of it. Will check out, good sir
@@confusedafsonimost of the fanbase is I say grown up now because if the passage of time
@@grathem9789 oh yeah. I forgot about them. Sorry 😅. But, then again, some of the audience are 9 - 12 year olds.
@@confusedafsoni yeah but you do have to factor in the insane VHS Tapes and the fazbear fanverse initiative
I am kind of annoyed by this. While PG-13 can still be violent and dark, I just really wanted to see a spring-lock failure in live action. And while action/dramas are usually more violent in PG-13 settings, horror movies like M3GAN are notoriously censored for PG-13 cuts. Fun fact btw, this was made by the producer of M3GAN, so all my hope of a serious fnaf movie is lost...
Feel like those hopes should’ve been lost by the time the full trailer came out.
@@aregularhorrorfan4184 yeah, with the marvel level dialogue and goofy ah animatronics
I thought the games were targeted towards kids and teens? Making it R would cut out a large chunk of the audience. Besides, M3gan made it clear PG-13 can work perfectly for something like this.
I got to agree with you on everything you said, I mean I’m just happy that we are getting a movie for this Franchise as it always felt like it deserved to have its own movie and no we are finally getting sure it’s PG 13 but that doesn’t change anything sure it may not show as much gore as some people would like but that’s ok, the main thing is that they get a great and fun and scary movie out which recaptures the vibe of the games and that they have good character arcs for our heroes and villains.
I honestly don’t care what age rating is it, I’m just grateful that we’re FINALLY getting a movie after 8 fucking years. That’s all it matters!
Same here.
As long they can make a good story for the movie that's all that matters
I don't care what the rating is as long as it's a good movie
I am aware of fnaf basics but I have only played the security breach game myself (minus playing the old ones in school with friends). My take on this is that the games ratings were never 18+ and neither did they show any gore so making the film a 13+ makes sense. The games rely in suspense, design and jumpscares to get that 'horror' rating so as long as the movie follows that then it is technically accurate and targets the audience it was originally for.
I'm hoping for it to be 90's hard PG-13
As an adult FNAF fan, I am honestly glad to hear that it has a PG-13 rating. It’s really going to open up the movie to so many more audiences that wouldn’t see it otherwise.
As someone who’ll be 14 by the time the movie releases, I’m really glad to hear that it’s PG-13 as well, so I can watch it and spot all the references, and without waiting for it to be released in stores
That’s lame. People should play the games. The mainstream fan base always ruins things. No respect for the source material.
@@firstnamelastname956yeah, no respect.
The kids can go away...
@@aubergineman3205 I agree.
@@firstnamelastname956that kid fan base has long gone like me im 13 almost turning 14 and making the movie pg13 can let the now grown up and more matured fanbase actually have a reason to watch it and blumhouse makes better sales and hopefully completing the 3 part movie deal blumhouse signed for
PG-13, or or versus, or which do you think?
Well to be fair, Scott has always pleased his audience, so I’d imagine he could find a loophole to make the movie as violent as possible for the matured audience
I'm fine with this. We don't need a gory and depressingly serious movie, this one is trying to be a bit more light hearted and fun while still being scary.
I am really happy that it is this rating so younger fans can enjoy (like minors) the movie! ❤
I find it kinda annoying, but predictable. We've been waiting for years, we're grown up now. We want to see something more fitting for us- the people who waited almost a decade for this. I hope that it uses its rating well, though, and that we all didn't wait years for some cheesy, overly kid-friendly money grabber.
I'm still glad we're getting a movie at all though. I hope it comes out scary.
The chica shower scene will definitely make the film rated R
Ok I still wants this movie
I think the spring lock scene could be completely shown while still maintaining PG-13, on paper, it’s just metal and crunching noises, William going stiff, some funny red juice, and screaming. If they can get away with child ‘slaying’, they can get away with doing the spring lock scene.
I really hope we don't see kids get gutted
@@EliRetroVHS642it’s a fnaf movie they better show it
@@death7380 That's disgusting and if it's PG-13 that's probably not happening
@@EliRetroVHS642"that's disgusting"
It's FNAF. If we don't see some kind of visual of children being murdered how am I supposed to take it seriously? I want to feel bad for wronged kids not laugh because they completely skip it over.
@@death7380 It's PG-13, so that's not gonna be shown.
hope we get a uncensored/unrated cut
I knew it was going to be PG-13 five nights at Freddy’s is extremely popular with kids
As long as we get a unrated version or something like a director's cut will be good cause m3gan has a unrated version on peacock and it a lot better than the one we got in theaters. But both versions are good
It honestly makes sense to be pg13 because no one ever saw the kids being murdered, they were lured away by William in a spring Bonnie suit and murdered but no one saw it so I think that would be the only reason we would see blood in THIS movie
4:20
For the Springlock failure scene, it will most likely, like he kind of said, just toned down a bit. I think it will either be off screen, hearing screaming, or like 3C said.
Why were you looking forward to a Chica Shower Scene?
see now I'm a kid cause I'm only 12, but I still liked FNaF for like 5 to 6 years, also I still watch a bunch more horror movies with gore and all that, but now I feel like people are just being plain rude now on tiktok and other apps. It's just outta hand now, some people just have to accept that people like something.
People also forget that World War Z and Happy Death Day and Cloverfield was PG13. Even though it has a PG13 rating, it still has potential to be pretty bloody and scary
I’m actually glad they did, it was a really smart choice. I’m speaking for the younger audience (I’m a teen) I have a lot of friends that are into the lore and fnaf. So making it this rating will lead to a lot more people watching it. This will also help me to understand the lore better (help everyone really). I think what everyone wanted to see was the spring lock and Afton on his killing spree
Yk all movies should be rated pg 13 because if a child dares to watch it then he obviously doing it out of free will because fnaf movie with also the games being genuinely Gordy and scary the kid knows about fnaf and has likely played the game before so he will not be frightened by the game
Edit : mom I have 69’420 likes
I am happy that I can watch the fnaf movie with my siblings. and we are also young.
For the whole time, I wanted it to be rated-R because of the gore.
I don't know why u expected gore in the first place
@@LowTierMarstonecause it’s a game about dead children being shoved in animatronic suits, and people having their entire body’s mutilated by millions of tiny robotic pieces. People have their frontal lobes torn our by huge bears. That’s some pretty heavy stuff, and that’s just a tiny piece of it.
You really don't know Scott don't you? He doesn't like to show explicit violence.
@@nucygnet5881 most of the FNAF games shows a little bit of blood or the jumps scares look like it can show blood. Night one of FNAF 1, phone guy was talking about the bite of 83. And the bite of 83 had blood in the game.
@@MonkeyMan90.5 here's the thing though, pretty much non of that is ever shown, the majority of it is all told and implied and when it is shown it's in minigame form or just red on the screen.
Let’s be real, just hearing the victim of the animatronics and knowing what the animatronics are doing can cause the human mind to think of the most disturbing scenes, far more disturbing than whatever can be put on the big screen.
Imagination can be more effective than viewing it
I cannot fathom the delusions of people who thought this movie was going to be rated R. Just even after seeing the trailers, how is there people who still thought this? The franchise implies a lot of dark things, but has always been very kid friendly. People who are actually upset about this are either 12 or just not familiar with the franchise.
It’s the vhs tapes that’s what they think FNaF is like don’t get me wrong those vhs tapes are really well made but so many people have let those videos distort their view of what FNaF is it’s not gonna be watered down it’s gonna not be overdone
Horror-kid friendly frachise?
And u call us delusional?
@@theceoofeggmansempire5214 they exist. There’s plenty of movies and shows that fall into the category of horror and are still for kids. Goosebumps, scary stories to tell in the dark, monster House, Coraline, anything by Tim burton. Not everything horror related has to have extreme blood and guts. And it’s good that there are things like this that open up the genre to kids, because it would be worse if a nine-year-old was introduced to horror with a movie like saw, or Halloween.
@@theceoofeggmansempire5214 welcome to mascot horror would you like an introduction
@theceoofeggmansempire5214 I mean Goosebumps exists..
Another reason its PG-13 is so they can make money off of it. If its Rated-R then only older people will go see it since most parents wouldn't let their kids see it.