George Daniels - Persuading Omega to take an interest in the co-axial escapement (48/85)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 28

  • @jpogigtxcr1778
    @jpogigtxcr1778 5 лет назад +41

    This movement is reason why I chose a Seamaster over a Submariner.

    • @StephanJPPL
      @StephanJPPL 2 года назад +1

      Same here. My Seamaster 300 has an accuracy of about +0.2 sec per day. During nights it stands on the crown which seems to be the best "sleeping" position.

    • @Mark-lj1dj
      @Mark-lj1dj 4 месяца назад

      Same here. The Seamaster is more beautiful anyway but it's also a better watch because of the coaxial. I have a Seamaster 300m and a Planet Ocean for the same price as one inferior Submariner. No brainer 🤷‍♂️

  • @deemdoubleu
    @deemdoubleu 6 лет назад +20

    The Swiss "not invented here syndrome" was quite ironic since the lever escapement wasn't invented there anyway.

  • @SOPHIAFLYGIRL
    @SOPHIAFLYGIRL Месяц назад +1

    N E V E R underestimate the motivation of an apprentice. They are often extremely motivated to learn new things.

  • @bharatc.sampat6406
    @bharatc.sampat6406 5 лет назад +4

    Thank You for your genius and deciphering the hype God be with you

  • @Mark-lj1dj
    @Mark-lj1dj Год назад +4

    Its funny that Omega sort of bothered to give his escapement a chance. Now it's their biggest selling point. It's the major reason Omega beats Rolex, other than price point.

  • @stevefox8605
    @stevefox8605 2 года назад +3

    Legend 🇬🇧👍🏻

  • @rage8kage
    @rage8kage 3 года назад +7

    It's a crying shame he bothered to pursue omega. He liked the prestige. He had a thought of his own legacy that's the problem. If he hadn't the faintest idea of his own greatness. He would have brought the new escapement to the world 20yrs earlier with some Japanese maker who would bite his hands off. He also wanted to prove to the best Swiss makers that he's better than them. So he wasted 20yrs with them. And Now his name isn't even on all these coaxials. Real shame

    • @IrishScribbler
      @IrishScribbler 2 года назад +3

      What the fuck are you on about? Omega wasn’t the only Swiss watch manufacturer offered the co axial movement. Zenith and Rolex were too. Omega, however, were the only ones intelligent enough to use the lovely and good luck to them. They are an amazing watchmaker.

    • @rage8kage
      @rage8kage 2 года назад +1

      @@IrishScribbler that's exactly it. They're all Swiss watch makers. He really wanted to stick it to the swiss. He should have went to Seiko with his invention

    • @horologyhandle
      @horologyhandle 17 дней назад

      ​@@rage8kage I understand your point, but it's an unfortunate reality that "Swiss Made" is still considered by many to be the highest and most recognizable standard within horology. It consistently receives the most press, sales, and trust amongst consumers. Daniels also had uncompromising standards, and I believe he initially wanted to partner with a company that had more of an emphasis on quality over quantity to meet his exacting standards - and Grand Seiko wasn't a clear independent brand yet. For those reasons and more, I can understand Daniels' desire to to manifest his invention within the production of a prestigious Swiss company. Seiko would have done a good enough job with it, but since they were already developing the spring drive, Daniels' invention may have been overshadowed or under appreciated or simply not taken on. Not to mention, the fact that you can now buy a Speedmaster with a coaxial escapement is a fantastic conversion of horological importance and a win for enthusiasts

  • @ericashmusic8889
    @ericashmusic8889 6 лет назад +1

    This just goes to prove something I discovered around 1964. despite all the Hype-

  • @Orrico84Harp
    @Orrico84Harp 3 года назад +2

    Mah Hero! Watch Hero

  • @infinitytoinfinitysquaredb7836
    @infinitytoinfinitysquaredb7836 4 года назад +4

    Build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door. Build a better watch and time stands still.

  • @juniorjohnson5961
    @juniorjohnson5961 3 года назад +2

    From what I've been able to find they waited until the patent expired and then supposedly improved it and he got nothing !

    • @ALL-il1sw
      @ALL-il1sw 2 года назад +1

      That's just what Rolex fans say🤣

    • @Mpayne1472
      @Mpayne1472 2 года назад

      @@ALL-il1sw absolutely nothing wrong with being a Rolex fan. I have been a fan since 1989 and I find no reason to change my allegiance thank you.

    • @ALL-il1sw
      @ALL-il1sw 2 года назад +1

      @@Mpayne1472 stay strong bro, nothing wrong with that. just don't spread hate or perpetuate lies on other brands.

    • @Mpayne1472
      @Mpayne1472 2 года назад +1

      @@ALL-il1sw never have

  • @crobulari2328
    @crobulari2328 6 лет назад +2

    George should have taken it to say Seiko !!.

    • @Waltham1892
      @Waltham1892 6 лет назад +2

      Seiko has the Spring Drive, which is essentially an escapementless electro-mechanical watch.
      Its very innovative, but not a purely mechanical watch.

    • @markn3586
      @markn3586 6 лет назад +3

      Yes, Seiko kicked their butts in the observatory competitions after they were opened up to the world. That's why they no longer hold them!

    • @dedsert9653
      @dedsert9653 4 месяца назад

      the japanese are much more nationalist and protectionist than the swiss. what george daniels describes here is rather minor compared to what you would experience in france or germany even today.

  • @oclvcarbon123
    @oclvcarbon123 2 года назад

    No way he asked Roger what his name is!! Come on!

    • @Mpayne1472
      @Mpayne1472 2 года назад +7

      You just didn’t understand the reference. He was giving Roger praise

    • @JustMeTalking
      @JustMeTalking 9 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@Mpayne1472100% Agreed. It's British humour and a massive nod to his FULL NAME.

    • @Mark-lj1dj
      @Mark-lj1dj 4 месяца назад +1

      Error 404 British humour not found