Great video. Thanks..... but regarding the Canon Pro-1000,- you didnt say, that this is an A2 printer.... not A4 or A3, but A2. This is a masive printer, that gives the best prints I have ever seen,- and I have been in the field of photography for over 30 years now. AND this printer CAN do roll prints for panoramic prints since the latest software update. Just to tell you and others...... cheers from Denmark.
@@kingstonemusarurwa336 If you were new to printing, one tip might be don't expect prints to look exactly as the photos on the screen. Remember that colour space, ambient light and paper type all affect how prints look.
You are ignoring the several elephants in the room. The average consumer does not make prints every day, or every month. This is the problem with inkjet printers as the print head clogs up with dried ink and wastes a lot of ink trying to clear it. If an ink runs out and you don't realize it, the print head can overheat and fail because it is the ink flow that cools it. Don't but a printer that does not have a user replaceable print head. Don't buy a printer that does not have refillable cartridges with third party inks, and can be reset to register full. I have been running a Canon Pro-100 for the past ten years. When idle, it is connected to a small PC that sends a 1/2 page test print every other day. This uses very little ink, and I print over the used paper. This prevents the printer from going through a head clearing routine before I make prints, which save a lot of ink. I have had to replace the print head once because I did not realize that the yellow cartridge ran dry. This cost me $100. Much cheaper than buying a new printer. The print quality remains excellent.
2 года назад+35
There are many printers out there but not mentioning the SureColor printers from Epson stands out a bit. Have the SureColor 800, now replaced by the 900 model on the market. And it prints long prints from a roller too! Outstanding printers for photos. Almost never use the SureColor for anything else. For regular printing documents or whatever I use the Epson Ecotank 2880 which works fine.
Give me some recomend for home use,but to be good quality pictures i have high quality pictures from kids. Recomend me some good quality printer mostly A4 i wanna priht
If you were buying a photo printer today, what would you buy?
Год назад+13
I don't know if we should compare quality of photos for 6-ink printers vs eg 9-ink. Usually gamut, dynamic range of the latter is much more better. I waste lot of money for "economic" photo printers before I discovered Epson SC-P600 and similar. Are you sure that mentioned PRO-1000 is comparable at all to eg. ET-8550 in terms of quality of colors?
What a "great" test ;) - The Pro 1000 has 11 inks + the croma optimzer. - The Pro 1000 does panaramic prints. - The Pro 1000 a better then the Pro 300. - Different facts/specs presentented throughout the video. - Espons Surecolor not in the test.
Thanks--great review. I purchased the ET-8500 and it is wonderful. Agree that the color is a bit over-saturated, but the operating cost is very low. I no longer send prints out. Printed over 700 pictures on the fist ink tanks, and still had ink left.
@@captaintravel5823I’m not sure there is a good photo on bond paper. The printer prints well on bond, but photos are typically way too saturated to reproduce well on bond.
@@ebayseller6040 can you print big beautiful pictures with the models that you suggested? Also can you use them with transfer paper to print onto t shirts as well ?
I used to use an Epson ET-2550 ruclips.net/user/postUgkxciSwynMJ7PnUvvx11rewiu-yFBkZTl53 , an early model of the ink tank style. It worked well, but had one nuisance that drove me up the wall; if you didn't put it in high quality print mode you'd get a streak across the page. I'm happy to say I have yet to see this with this printer. The print quality has been fantastic so far, the set up was super easy. All in all I'm very happy with this printer.
My ET-2875 can print manual dobbelsides but the App Epson Smart Panel can only print a whole file, e.g. file is 100 pages but you only want 10 dobbeltsided . This is a software error, very easy to fix. But our local agent seems not able to communicate with Epson. What is wrong?
Never again an inkjet printer, always problems, ink runs out, nozzle blocked, fading colours, water damage, etc… i use a sublimation printer for a few years now, works perfect, never had a problem, brilliant colours.
Which sublimation printer? How are the colors? I want to print my own photo's onto wood surfaces but thought I would lose color accuracy with a sublimation printer. Would I?
If you're just printing photos for your own personal enjoyment and memories, you really can't afford to NOT buy the ecotank. Yes, the upfront cost is expensive. But the tanks last for ages before you have to refill. I have two eco-tank printers- one for photos, one for documents. Despite needing to print a fair amount for course work and for communicating with builders, I only have had to re-fill the tanks three times in the past 6 years - I've printed thousands of pages. I've just recently brought the ET-5800. The picture quality is more than decent, and it costs mere cents per photo. Cartridges are a rip-off, and should only be tolerated if you have no other choice. If you do have a choice, go with the eco-tank printers. It WILL save you money in the long-run.
Can anyone help..I need a printer for my cricut maker. Every cricut owner praises Epson for affordability and how long the ink lasta but most of these cricut owners don't know any better about the quality of their prints because for many of them it's their first printer and it's good enough. I've seen one side-by-side comparison of an epson vs a canon printer and the canon colour was more accurate and vivid. Can someone with experienc recommend which to get - Canon or Epson? And which model? Im choosing based onboth short and long term costs and print colour accuracy and vividness. Thanks ❤
Epson p700/p900? Hello? I have the p800 ... fabulous A2 pigment ink printer for fine art prints, and has roll feeder for panoramas. If you omit these its not a serious video.
Tank printer's cost more and are pretty bare minimal in features compared to cartridge printers. That's where the tank printers get you. The cartridge printers cost less but where these companies make their money is by you constantly buying the expensive ink cartridge replacements. You can get a cartridge printer that is loaded with features like touchscreen controls, scan, copy, fax, auto two sided printing, front loading paper trays, automated etc. and they'll cost you far less than a bottom of the line tank printer with no touchscreen, no auto two sided printing, no fax, no auto feed. And that's where they get you by selling you a bare bones printer to make up for the loss of selling you expensive cartridges. Depending on how much you print you may come out ahead or break even depending on when the printer fails. Printers need to be used on a regular basis to keep the ink moving through the system otherwise the ink will start gunking up the system. Should do something once every week or two like print something or do a cleaning cycle or something. Something like that would waste ink so maybe a tank printer may be feasible if the ink cost is less and holds more than a cartridge.
CANON PRO-1000: $1,200 USD CANON PRO-300: $850 USD Now, add in the cost of ink and paper. Save yourself a ton of money and have your enlargements done by a professional lab.
@@penelopebranson1565 Not the way I see it. Let's say someone purchased the Pro-1000. Let's add sales tax and all the costs of the extras like paper and ink. I think we can agree we'd be somewhere around $1400. That's without making a single print. For around $20 I can get a 16X20 color print done by a pro lab. And it will be done correctly. If not, I send it back with a dissatisfied comment and I get a redone print at no extra cost to me. I can do that for about 200 prints before I reach the $1400 threshold. 200 prints using a self purchased printer like the Pro-1000 would certainly require additional supplies of ink, adding more to the cost. So unless a person is actually a Pro Lab with a significant customer base and a huge volume of work behind it, I can't see the advantage.
First off - over all print quality for photos is based solely on the accuracy of the icc profile for the paper being used. So comparing quality differences between printers is, basically, meaningless. Individual icc profiles need to be made for each type of paper surface and manufacturer for each individual printer to make any comparison valid. One need to use an X-Rites spectrophotometer and accompanying software , or equivalent, to make any such comparison's really meaningful. And if the computer screen being used to view does not have its own icc profile - getting consistent, accurate results is nothing more that a crap shoot. My old Epson 3880 Pro (17"x what ever) so set up rivals the quality and print longevity of traditional silver based photo prints. And I am speaking as a former photo engineer with FujiFilm.
Icc profiles have nothing to do with bronzing from a pigment printer on glossy paper. You can make as many profiles as you like, bronzing will always occur in your prints, this has to do with the microscopic particles of the pigment ink. Dye ink on glossy paper the colors will be more beautiful than pigment on glossy paper and an icc profile will not change that.
@@charlesverbruggen1011 Did not say they will - that was just an inference on your part 😀 Bronzing is a function of a few factors - dye vs pigment inks and not only paper surfaces but also brands. With the latter two it has to due with surface 'gloss' - the higher the gloss the greater the problem can be. And none can match the 'smoothness' of traditional silver based prints. My point only had to do with trying to compare different printer's characteristics to one and other with the generic profiles supplied by the manufacture. They can range from OK to pure junk. The comment about saturation of color with the one unit - that problem could easily be corrected with a decent icc profile. As an aside - have been in continuing discussions with X-Rite about including an actual icc editor in their current iterations of the i-Profile software which was available in earlier versions. The current iteration consistently produces a magenta/red shift, on a 21 step gray scale of between 2-3 cc's starting around step 14 and visible up to step 18/19 as 20 and 21 are to dark to see unless viewed under very strong light.
The Canon Pro 1000 can print up to a maximum printable length of 47.2 inches (1200.0 mm). Is that not what you would consider to be a "longer landscape print"? If that's not panorama I don't know what is. The printer also uses 12 ink cartridges plus the chroma optimizer, not 10. You need to do a better job of research.
If one checks the Canon website or B&H, the maximum paper size is listed as 17x22", and a max print length of 25.5". The firmware upgrade to get the 47" prints is very poorly advertised.
Pigment inks are better than dye inks when exposed to ultraviolet light. As an example from the video, the canon pro-1000 uses pigment ink, while the Epson 8550 uses dye ink. Hope this helps.
@@romanticdonkey468 you can also find top coats that protect from UV rays. For example,, I use a lot of spar varnish on projects that go outside, although so far it's not available in a matte finish.
@@danijelkadic7929 I actually bought a Canon Pixma Megatank because I was at the Canon store for my camera maintenance, and they had a sale of the printer. It's one of the basic model with basic CMYK colors (try get a model with a little screen to make life easier), but the print quality is very good for average person (you do need to try out different types of paper, I find print quality depends on paper quality). I say it's even okay for photographer/artist just starting their business. But you do need the Canon paper for best print quality. I tried other brands, and sometime the inks don't dry, leaving roller mark on the photo paper, which did not happen with Canon brand photo paper. I had it for a year now, printed teaching material, flyers, photo, invitation cards (definitely over 500 sheets) and it's not even half way down. It's amazing. The printer is easy to use, always connects (as long as you have stable wifi connection). Very happy with the purchase. In comparison I had the worst experience with Hp printers. Never had an epson printer, so I can't comment on that.
Dye ink printers, like the Ecotank and smaller Canon models, are not ideal for art or photo reproductions. The prints tend to fade quickly unless they're stored in a sun-protected, airtight environment. In typical conditions, they can start to fade within months and deteriorate significantly within a year. For prints meant to be displayed, pigment-based inks are the better option for long-lasting quality.
The canon pro 1000 has 11 color pigment ink cartridges plus chroma optimiser, and not 10 cartridges (2min 11sec). You should do your homework better, with the canon 300 you are making another mistake, the pro 300 is a pigment printer and will be best with matt paper and not with glossy paper. (6min 36sec)..... Cheers from Belgium
@@seoulrydr Pigment will keep the longest, although canon claims their dye inks will keep for at least 100 years. If you use matte paper, pigment ink will result better. For glossy paper, dye ink will show up much better than pigment, see Jose Rodriguez on you tube.
@@seoulrydr I have had both a Canon Pro 200 and the Pro 1000 - Regarding IQ I could not tell the difference - But the Pro 200 "popped" a bit more and pictures with "strog" colours, and the Pro 1000 was better at B/W... But the differences are quite small
@@hansholck5982 The pro 1000 has a chroma optimizer on board, which explains why it is more difficult to compare the prints of the two printers. Chroma O puts a film over the print to prevent bronzing as much as possible.
Don't buy the HP unless you enjoy having the printer refuse to work unless the ink cartridge is both HP and In-Date. I can't even use my old HP for scanning if I don't have the "right" ink cartridges installed. Meanwhile my Epson 8550 prints more pages in one fill than the HP could for $1000. No exaggeration.
Playing B-roll for the companies doesn't help me, put all the printers on a video printing the same image would be helpful and at different sizes. I too can just believe the ads for the printers and say which is best without testing them. This is poor consumer advice, show the printers actually printing, setting them up, the relative sizes of them, the draw backs of each and so on. Don't just show what the companies show and say they the best because the company says so. What a waste of my time.
Real men use paper that comes in sizes called something like "Ax". Inches have been obsolete since 1970 in the UK,a nd the 1800's in the rest of Europe!
Except you wouldn't know what the best photo printers of 2023 were back in January of 2023! The year had barely even begun yet. I really hate it when you people do that. I also hate it when you waste 2 minutes of my life intro'ing your video. This isn't speech class, this isn't an essay. This is the internet. Get on with it. You have a title and a description that already tell me what the video is going to be. Again, GET ON WITH IT!
![I Replaced ALL my ADOBE APPS with these [free or cheaper] Alternatives!](/img/1.gif)
► Links to the Best Photo Printers 2025 we listed in this video:
► 5. HP Envy 7855 - geni.us/HPENVY7855
► 4. Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-1000 - geni.us/Canon1000
► 3. Canon PIXMA TS8320 - geni.us/CanonTS8320
► 2. Epson EcoTank Photo ET-8550 - geni.us/EpsonET-8550
► 1. Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 - geni.us/CanonPRO-300
It Would be nice if this video shows actual testing. This feels more like an advertisement
Great video. Thanks..... but regarding the Canon Pro-1000,- you didnt say, that this is an A2 printer.... not A4 or A3, but A2. This is a masive printer, that gives the best prints I have ever seen,- and I have been in the field of photography for over 30 years now. AND this printer CAN do roll prints for panoramic prints since the latest software update. Just to tell you and others...... cheers from Denmark.
So It wasn't a bad a choice for me, I just got one. And I am new to the industry
@@kingstonemusarurwa336 If you were new to printing, one tip might be don't expect prints to look exactly as the photos on the screen. Remember that colour space, ambient light and paper type all affect how prints look.
Thanks for the informations for you both
How will it do roller prints without a roller?
@@memcrew1 You basically cut the paper to the length you need for the print, and set a custom size in the settings.
You are ignoring the several elephants in the room. The average consumer does not make prints every day, or every month. This is the problem with inkjet printers as the print head clogs up with dried ink and wastes a lot of ink trying to clear it. If an ink runs out and you don't realize it, the print head can overheat and fail because it is the ink flow that cools it. Don't but a printer that does not have a user replaceable print head. Don't buy a printer that does not have refillable cartridges with third party inks, and can be reset to register full. I have been running a Canon Pro-100 for the past ten years. When idle, it is connected to a small PC that sends a 1/2 page test print every other day. This uses very little ink, and I print over the used paper. This prevents the printer from going through a head clearing routine before I make prints, which save a lot of ink. I have had to replace the print head once because I did not realize that the yellow cartridge ran dry. This cost me $100. Much cheaper than buying a new printer. The print quality remains excellent.
There are many printers out there but not mentioning the SureColor printers from Epson stands out a bit. Have the SureColor 800, now replaced by the 900 model on the market. And it prints long prints from a roller too! Outstanding printers for photos. Almost never use the SureColor for anything else. For regular printing documents or whatever I use the Epson Ecotank 2880 which works fine.
Give me some recomend for home use,but to be good quality pictures i have high quality pictures from kids. Recomend me some good quality printer mostly A4 i wanna priht
If you were buying a photo printer today, what would you buy?
I don't know if we should compare quality of photos for 6-ink printers vs eg 9-ink. Usually gamut, dynamic range of the latter is much more better. I waste lot of money for "economic" photo printers before I discovered Epson SC-P600 and similar. Are you sure that mentioned PRO-1000 is comparable at all to eg. ET-8550 in terms of quality of colors?
Different needs for different home offices
Some recomend for quality A4 printer ?
Ended up purchasing a Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-1000. Love the print quality and size of the prints it produces.
They left the similar Epson SureColor 900 off this list, did you look into that one? I am looking at Epson and wondering why you chose Canon.
What a "great" test ;)
- The Pro 1000 has 11 inks + the croma optimzer.
- The Pro 1000 does panaramic prints.
- The Pro 1000 a better then the Pro 300.
- Different facts/specs presentented throughout the video.
- Espons Surecolor not in the test.
I am looking to start a small photo magnet business and need a photo printer. Whcih printer is a good for beginner that is affordable
Thanks--great review. I purchased the ET-8500 and it is wonderful. Agree that the color is a bit over-saturated, but the operating cost is very low. I no longer send prints out. Printed over 700 pictures on the fist ink tanks, and still had ink left.
Love my 8500 also ….best printer I’ve ever had and same huge plus that you had in ink lasting ! People love my prints for cards now!
is it great for printing full-color photos on a bond paper??
@@captaintravel5823I’m not sure there is a good photo on bond paper. The printer prints well on bond, but photos are typically way too saturated to reproduce well on bond.
All bot comments as you see in the username... Great job Epson
@@martinschmidt1652 I'm not a bot. It really is a good printer.
Excellent reporting 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
cartridges are a joke now. there is no reason for anyone to EVER buy a cartridge printer anymore. eco tank all day everyday (I own 3 models)
Thanks for the info, didn’t know that. What model do you recommend?
@@acrp2770 mostly epson t3170x and Epson et15000
I’m so done with cartridges. 20 prints and it’s already running out of ink.
@@ebayseller6040 can you print big beautiful pictures with the models that you suggested? Also can you use them with transfer paper to print onto t shirts as well ?
Which one do you have. Im looking to purchase a photo printer for my business
Can anyone guide me on all these reliability rate? Over years?
Very helpful. TQ 🙏
I used to use an Epson ET-2550 ruclips.net/user/postUgkxciSwynMJ7PnUvvx11rewiu-yFBkZTl53 , an early model of the ink tank style. It worked well, but had one nuisance that drove me up the wall; if you didn't put it in high quality print mode you'd get a streak across the page. I'm happy to say I have yet to see this with this printer. The print quality has been fantastic so far, the set up was super easy. All in all I'm very happy with this printer.
If you were buying a photo printer today, what would you buy?
Canon inks are very expensive and the maintenance cartridge too
I own a image prograf 520
My favorite is always Epson
Very economic and profitable
If you were buying a photo printer today, what would you buy?
As always high quality content that makes finding what we need easy. Thanks!
Cual recomiendas?
Can these print art or pictures on both side on the paper
Do you have to have a print shop to print fine art photos?
My ET-2875 can print manual dobbelsides but the App Epson Smart Panel can only print a whole file, e.g. file is 100 pages but you only want 10 dobbeltsided . This is a software error, very easy to fix. But our local agent seems not able to communicate with Epson. What is wrong?
I am surprise that the Epson SureColor P900 is not here. I think it is better than the Canon Pro-1000.
Me to, but having to pick the best is very difficoult - I went with the Pro 1000, but I think the Epson is just a good :)
"the only models to consider for printing photos are CANON and EPSON..."
"And now the ranking: #5 is a HP printer..."
lol.... I noticed that too
If you were buying a photo printer today, what would you buy?
Think you've missed the Cannon film printer ! No ink but uses colour films, worth having a look , but the big one very expensive.
Are you talking about the cannon 4770 let me know thanks
Correction - The Canon Pro 1000 CAN do large landscape/panoramic prints up to 1200mm
Never again an inkjet printer, always problems, ink runs out, nozzle blocked, fading colours, water damage, etc… i use a sublimation printer for a few years now, works perfect, never had a problem, brilliant colours.
True, but you lose the flexibility of the inkjet.
Which sublimation printer? How are the colors? I want to print my own photo's onto wood surfaces but thought I would lose color accuracy with a sublimation printer. Would I?
If you're just printing photos for your own personal enjoyment and memories, you really can't afford to NOT buy the ecotank. Yes, the upfront cost is expensive. But the tanks last for ages before you have to refill. I have two eco-tank printers- one for photos, one for documents. Despite needing to print a fair amount for course work and for communicating with builders, I only have had to re-fill the tanks three times in the past 6 years - I've printed thousands of pages.
I've just recently brought the ET-5800. The picture quality is more than decent, and it costs mere cents per photo.
Cartridges are a rip-off, and should only be tolerated if you have no other choice. If you do have a choice, go with the eco-tank printers. It WILL save you money in the long-run.
Make sure it’s a new model tank printer. Older models need expensive cleaning maint.
Which printer gives how many copies
Can anyone help..I need a printer for my cricut maker. Every cricut owner praises Epson for affordability and how long the ink lasta but most of these cricut owners don't know any better about the quality of their prints because for many of them it's their first printer and it's good enough. I've seen one side-by-side comparison of an epson vs a canon printer and the canon colour was more accurate and vivid. Can someone with experienc recommend which to get - Canon or Epson? And which model? Im choosing based onboth short and long term costs and print colour accuracy and vividness. Thanks ❤
Epson p700/p900? Hello?
I have the p800 ... fabulous A2 pigment ink printer for fine art prints, and has roll feeder for panoramas. If you omit these its not a serious video.
Tank printer's cost more and are pretty bare minimal in features compared to cartridge printers. That's where the tank printers get you. The cartridge printers cost less but where these companies make their money is by you constantly buying the expensive ink cartridge replacements. You can get a cartridge printer that is loaded with features like touchscreen controls, scan, copy, fax, auto two sided printing, front loading paper trays, automated etc. and they'll cost you far less than a bottom of the line tank printer with no touchscreen, no auto two sided printing, no fax, no auto feed. And that's where they get you by selling you a bare bones printer to make up for the loss of selling you expensive cartridges. Depending on how much you print you may come out ahead or break even depending on when the printer fails.
Printers need to be used on a regular basis to keep the ink moving through the system otherwise the ink will start gunking up the system. Should do something once every week or two like print something or do a cleaning cycle or something. Something like that would waste ink so maybe a tank printer may be feasible if the ink cost is less and holds more than a cartridge.
Thank you for the advice!
Information on the Pro-1000 is incorrect - it has 12 Ink Tanks not Ten
CANON PRO-1000: $1,200 USD
CANON PRO-300: $850 USD
Now, add in the cost of ink and paper. Save yourself a ton of money and have your enlargements done by a professional lab.
pay now or pay all along the way. Wouldn't it balance out?
@@penelopebranson1565 Not the way I see it. Let's say someone purchased the Pro-1000. Let's add sales tax and all the costs of the extras like paper and ink. I think we can agree we'd be somewhere around $1400. That's without making a single print. For around $20 I can get a 16X20 color print done by a pro lab. And it will be done correctly. If not, I send it back with a dissatisfied comment and I get a redone print at no extra cost to me. I can do that for about 200 prints before I reach the $1400 threshold. 200 prints using a self purchased printer like the Pro-1000 would certainly require additional supplies of ink, adding more to the cost. So unless a person is actually a Pro Lab with a significant customer base and a huge volume of work behind it, I can't see the advantage.
@@markmalasics3413You schooled that trans person
@@Ihavetocorrectyou You had ONE job, to make an intelligent response, and failed. Yes, quite an embarrassment.
@@markmalasics3413well said
First off - over all print quality for photos is based solely on the accuracy of the icc profile for the paper being used. So comparing quality differences between printers is, basically, meaningless. Individual icc profiles need to be made for each type of paper surface and manufacturer for each individual printer to make any comparison valid. One need to use an X-Rites spectrophotometer and accompanying software , or equivalent, to make any such comparison's really meaningful. And if the computer screen being used to view does not have its own icc profile - getting consistent, accurate results is nothing more that a crap shoot. My old Epson 3880 Pro (17"x what ever) so set up rivals the quality and print longevity of traditional silver based photo prints. And I am speaking as a former photo engineer with FujiFilm.
Icc profiles have nothing to do with bronzing from a pigment printer on glossy paper. You can make as many profiles as you like, bronzing will always occur in your prints, this has to do with the microscopic particles of the pigment ink. Dye ink on glossy paper the colors will be more beautiful than pigment on glossy paper and an icc profile will not change that.
@@charlesverbruggen1011 Did not say they will - that was just an inference on your part 😀 Bronzing is a function of a few factors - dye vs pigment inks and not only paper surfaces but also brands. With the latter two it has to due with surface 'gloss' - the higher the gloss the greater the problem can be. And none can match the 'smoothness' of traditional silver based prints. My point only had to do with trying to compare different printer's characteristics to one and other with the generic profiles supplied by the manufacture. They can range from OK to pure junk. The comment about saturation of color with the one unit - that problem could easily be corrected with a decent icc profile. As an aside - have been in continuing discussions with X-Rite about including an actual icc editor in their current iterations of the i-Profile software which was available in earlier versions. The current iteration consistently produces a magenta/red shift, on a 21 step gray scale of between 2-3 cc's starting around step 14 and visible up to step 18/19 as 20 and 21 are to dark to see unless viewed under very strong light.
@@citroenfan8930 Im here for the nerd battle - - Citro vs. Charles. Cmon Charles - dont stop, unless you were WRONG
You completely missed to mention Deli printers.
Out of date information as firmware updates have changed some specs
The Canon Pro 1000 can print up to a maximum printable length of 47.2 inches (1200.0 mm). Is that not what you would consider to be a "longer landscape print"? If that's not panorama I don't know what is. The printer also uses 12 ink cartridges plus the chroma optimizer, not 10. You need to do a better job of research.
If one checks the Canon website or B&H, the maximum paper size is listed as 17x22", and a max print length of 25.5". The firmware upgrade to get the 47" prints is very poorly advertised.
Can somebody please help me with a hint which printer / ink prints the most resistant prints to color fading when exposed to sunlight.
Pigment inks are better than dye inks when exposed to ultraviolet light. As an example from the video, the canon pro-1000 uses pigment ink, while the Epson 8550 uses dye ink. Hope this helps.
@@romanticdonkey468 you can also find top coats that protect from UV rays. For example,, I use a lot of spar varnish on projects that go outside, although so far it's not available in a matte finish.
In my opinion, the intro is too loud compared to the rest of the audio. It startled my cat.
Price
Qualcuno supporto c''è "Fine Art" su Epson ET-8500 o ET-8550?
will go with epson just because it gives more color for refillable tank model
If you were buying a photo printer today, what would you buy?
@@danijelkadic7929 I actually bought a Canon Pixma Megatank because I was at the Canon store for my camera maintenance, and they had a sale of the printer. It's one of the basic model with basic CMYK colors (try get a model with a little screen to make life easier), but the print quality is very good for average person (you do need to try out different types of paper, I find print quality depends on paper quality). I say it's even okay for photographer/artist just starting their business. But you do need the Canon paper for best print quality. I tried other brands, and sometime the inks don't dry, leaving roller mark on the photo paper, which did not happen with Canon brand photo paper.
I had it for a year now, printed teaching material, flyers, photo, invitation cards (definitely over 500 sheets) and it's not even half way down. It's amazing.
The printer is easy to use, always connects (as long as you have stable wifi connection). Very happy with the purchase.
In comparison I had the worst experience with Hp printers. Never had an epson printer, so I can't comment on that.
I think FW update make panorama on canon 200/300 pro seroes
Thanks.
If you were buying a photo printer today, what would you buy?
Dye ink printers, like the Ecotank and smaller Canon models, are not ideal for art or photo reproductions. The prints tend to fade quickly unless they're stored in a sun-protected, airtight environment. In typical conditions, they can start to fade within months and deteriorate significantly within a year. For prints meant to be displayed, pigment-based inks are the better option for long-lasting quality.
If you were buying a photo printer today, what would you buy?
The central bank could use more of these.
The canon pro 1000 has 11 color pigment ink cartridges plus chroma optimiser, and not 10 cartridges (2min 11sec). You should do your homework better, with the canon 300 you are making another mistake, the pro 300 is a pigment printer and will be best with matt paper and not with glossy paper. (6min 36sec)..... Cheers from Belgium
In your opinion, which is the better ink for both archiving and IQ - pigment or dye ink?
@@seoulrydr Pigment will keep the longest, although canon claims their dye inks will keep for at least 100 years. If you use matte paper, pigment ink will result better. For glossy paper, dye ink will show up much better than pigment, see Jose Rodriguez on you tube.
@@seoulrydr I have had both a Canon Pro 200 and the Pro 1000 - Regarding IQ I could not tell the difference - But the Pro 200 "popped" a bit more and pictures with "strog" colours, and the Pro 1000 was better at B/W... But the differences are quite small
@@hansholck5982 The pro 1000 has a chroma optimizer on board, which explains why it is more difficult to compare the prints of the two printers. Chroma O puts a film over the print to prevent bronzing as much as possible.
If you were buying a photo printer today, what would you buy?
No se habla que sea especial para sublimación y los cabezales
Vos vidéos me intéresse ,mais je parle pas anglais
Don't buy the HP unless you enjoy having the printer refuse to work unless the ink cartridge is both HP and In-Date. I can't even use my old HP for scanning if I don't have the "right" ink cartridges installed. Meanwhile my Epson 8550 prints more pages in one fill than the HP could for $1000. No exaggeration.
Playing B-roll for the companies doesn't help me, put all the printers on a video printing the same image would be helpful and at different sizes. I too can just believe the ads for the printers and say which is best without testing them. This is poor consumer advice, show the printers actually printing, setting them up, the relative sizes of them, the draw backs of each and so on. Don't just show what the companies show and say they the best because the company says so. What a waste of my time.
I prefer HP.
The printer is the best in 2023, but i like epson
Thanks. Be kind to one another. Stay safe. Love to all
obnoxious
Real men use paper that comes in sizes called something like "Ax". Inches have been obsolete since 1970 in the UK,a nd the 1800's in the rest of Europe!
Dollars?
Why is a British site telling us the price in dollars?
What is a fax? I can’t believe they are still make machines with this feature
Still used quite a bit
TS printer mentioned is rubbish quality for photos and the ink runs out with hardly any use and expensive to replace
Except you wouldn't know what the best photo printers of 2023 were back in January of 2023! The year had barely even begun yet. I really hate it when you people do that. I also hate it when you waste 2 minutes of my life intro'ing your video. This isn't speech class, this isn't an essay. This is the internet. Get on with it. You have a title and a description that already tell me what the video is going to be. Again, GET ON WITH IT!
Hola amigo
Not much of a review for highest quality photo printers although you did touch on a few of the important points
does it say its a review....?
Those inks burn your pocket, haha
You’re not valid. I just chucked a new hp envy. Screw the money that things garbage.
* Hola para el hogar recomiendo epson, si te gusta dale una manito *
The best photo printers out there? This is ridiculous.
Gd
The most unprofessional setup I've ever seen.
F
이무리 잘만들어도 소비자가 알기쉽게 사용법
초등학교 졸업생도 사용할수있는 유튜브 필요
바보야 바로 경제야!
Canon sucks
Inkjet cartridge printer is the worse printer
Printing cost is too much
And Cartridge gets block every now and then