I'm a career woman, out of obligation, many working women would much rather be at home w their children, the working world isn't a nice place, men always knew it
@@jeanniefelix6534 EXACTLY. most women were thrust into the workplace OUT OF NECESSITY...whether it'd be a cheating, abusive husband, or abandonment, or lack of responsibility, or even death...I am NOT blaming ALL husbands (God bless and keep the good ones out there!- BUT- the good ones are not fundamentally the CAUSE for women resorting to feminism)...there are all kinds of reasons for women to have to work...mostly it's because we got tired of putting up with the negative, and not being able to defend ourselves....I can see how feminism has pushed the boundaries to where we may be over correcting, and that isn't good- either.
@@nvrsaydie the evil one's influence can be SAVAGE working through ANYONE...women, men, children, elders, priests, lay,...satan is AS evil, no matter the conduit.
Harrison Butker was the recent lightning rod for praising traditional gender roles. He struck a nerve when he said that what women do for their families will be remembered long after what they do for their companies. May we men recognize that the same principle applies to us.
Originally Jesus was warning about the seige of Jerusalem in 70 AD where people turned to cannibalism to survive without food. Those without children were considered more blessed.
This submission thing is confusing and I wish you would offer more practical advice. For example I married a man that I love very much and I thought/think he would be a great leader. So I’ve learned more about the faith and what it means to be a mom and wife. I work and I want to stay home and take care of my young children but my husband thinks right now I should continue working because the economy is unstable at the moment. sometimes I try to convince him that we should still try to have me stay home even though it’s a tight budget then I realize I am kind of trying to manipulate the situation. So even in these types of cases I should still just submit and listen to my husband? Because you guys talk a lot about women not wanting to submit but there’s a ton of examples where it’s confusing because people talk about what a woman’s role is but a lot of men don’t believe in those gender roles and a lot of us women are already married to men that believe that so more practical advice would be appreciated because I want to do the right and virtuous thing.
If he thinks there isn’t enough money financially and you must work then, you must submit to his judgment and work. Once you guys have made some money you can ask to him again. Until then you must submit to your husbands judgment.
It's because he's money hungry and even when the economy gets better with Trump (?), he will still convince you to work so you can "save money" for the future. Men are these days, despicable creatures!
I disagree with this. You can't do something you believe is immoral just because your husband says to. First rule of discernment, right, is that if something interferes with fulfilling one's vocation, you should consider dropping it. If working is interfering with your vocation as a wife and mother, then it's generally better to not work. Submitting to something you know is wrong is still sinful.
Here's an obvious example, if my husband would prefer I not take our children to Mass, I'm still obligated to take the children to Mass and teach them the faith. Submission to sin is not rightly ordered in any way.
@@victoriaeinbinder9487 the problem with your statement is that you are presupposing it’s immoral. Who makes the judgment if it’s immoral or not ? If the husband doesn’t have a good job to financially take care of the family and asks his helpmate to help, it’s not immoral. Yes he should do so in a way that she isn’t deprived of her motherly duties but as long as he makes the judgment that doesn’t affect that primary care, she is obligated to submit to him.
Thank you father Ripperger for helping make the woman I am today a more intelligent woman with communication. To really be a woman is to be free. Love to you every day. Thanks be to God.
* Good times make “strong” women * “strong” women emasculate and weaken men * weak men make hard times * hard times make humble women * humble women make strong men * strong men make good times
Lots of strong men still out there. Problem is they're more often than not labeled as controlling, toxic masculinists, misogynistic, etc. Would you submit to a proper man? That's the question modern women need to honestly ask themselves.
At every level of society men are emasculated from: 1. Family therapy 2. Education 3. Emasculated by wives and mothers 4. Environmental factors in the water 5. Media and entertainment 6. Legal system and then you have conservative women with their head in the dirt complaining in an asinine manner about men being weak
Blessings to both of you! My experience from ministry as a Deacon in marriage preparation, parish life, and campus ministry agrees with everything you say about the pervasive evil of feminism. I believes that this makes "three of us". Lord Jesus, please defend and protect us and Your holy Church.
My Dad is a Deacon of 11 yrs...he recently stepped out of a 25 yr marriage while in retirement with my mom...with his cousin....she tempted and manipulated him like a true serpent...I am so ashamed....please pray for me and I you..
@@lunarvania8073 Dear lunarvania8073, how painful it must be to be the victim of a broken marriage. So sad that your Deacon father gave way to temptation. Please pray for all clergy, especially Deacons who are the least corrupt branch of Holy Orders. Praying for you and your family! Lord Jesus, deliver us from evil!
@@shaunblack3246 Aww thank you so much! This has not only been a nightmare for my Mother and my brother, sister and I...but he also has 3 grandchildren he sacrificed. The worst part is he hasnt even tried to apologize....when I asked if he even felt remorse or want forgiveness hes reply was "god forgives people dont" thank you so much for your kind words! Evil has no bounds...God Bless You!
I dont know but i am a little old fashioned. Meaning keeping the household and giving a good example to my child. Not that a woman working is wrong but a mans work is different from a womans.
In 98 I had a coworker that divorced his wife for wanting to be a sahm. I’d love to have been a sahm but never found anyone who agreed. Too many twisted people out there.
"Feminism..." Men and women NEED each other. We're a team. The first woman Episcopal priest in Alabama, a friend of me and my wife, said she dropped out of the feminist movement because "they don't understand the difference between feminism and lesbianism."
True feminism is seeing and advocating for men and women to be seen as equal in value by society. People who have a problem with that have issues in general.
The reason why I don't subscribe to the whole relying on the man financially is because I have seen too many women ending up fending for themselves because their husband ends up abandoning them or they become bums. If anything I'd prefer not the 1950s trad life. I want the old farmer trad life because even though the wife was at home tending the farm and rearing the children at least she was still making an income. You can't really cheat too if you're all in the farm working lol
@@maripuff yes that makes sense. I see cases like this. In Canada the woman in entitled to half, but in other countries like Nigeria or the Congo the woman gets nothing. In muslim countries women are not allowed to work and exist at the whim of their often abusive ´husbands’
@@maripuff yes that makes sense. I see cases like this. In Canada the woman in entitled to half, but in other countries like Nigeria or the Congo the woman gets nothing. In muslim countries women are not allowed to work and exist at the whim of their often abusive ´husbands’
It is OK to be a SAHM, IMO, so long as you have some education or skills that would enable you to work if your husband could not. Even a good and loving husband could get laid off from his job, or become ill or disabled, or die suddenly and force the wife to become the breadwinner through no fault of his own. A SAHM could also perform work at home, sell crafts, etc. on Etsy, or take a part time job during hours when her husband is home or the children are in school. Being a "trad wife" doesn't totally exclude ways for the wife to bring in extra income when needed.
woman working - making 2 chqs per family has made everything go up and up in prices now.........both husband and wife/mother has to work leaving kids not raising there own going to nursery schools to raise. seems backwards, have a baby....send them off to someone else to watch their first steps, growing up etc. working to pay them to look after your kids. so sad. i had to move out of town to a cheaper house so i could afford to stay home with my kids....i just couldnt do it. now i dont know if thats possible to raise kids as stay at home (of course there is 1 year after birth thats it). Thank you feminists ....(: so sad for those who want to raise there own kids.
Believe it or not, back in the early 2000's Elizabeth Warren -- yes, THE Elizabeth Warren the now Dem Senator from Massachusetts -- wrote a book (with her daughter) titled "The Two-Income Trap" in which she argued AGAINST married couples building their lifestyle around both spouses working. When only one spouse is the breadwinner, she wrote, the other spouse is there as a backup in case the breadwinner loses their job, becomes sick/injured, etc., and their income does not suffer as much of a hit as when they are living on two salaries and lose one. I have not read the book but have heard about it and it has often been cited in the past in defense of SAHMs.
If in ~95% of traditional conservative marriages the wives have reduced their husbands to mere domesticated, beasts of burden then imagine just marriages in general… This is why churches have become so useless because you need to appeal to women’s pride and insecurities to stay relevant. None of those wives in the 80-95% femturd marriages will reach paradise because humility is the ticket for entrance into heaven. Even in some of the most traditional, conservative, pious, religious Christian homes (the last hold outs in this Age of Eve AoE), the husband doesn’t actually have any true headship or authority because when push comes to shove the wife generally has exclusive legal (corrupt gynocentric/ Eve-centric courts) and social (court of public opinion, within the context of relationships the women’s account is more readily believed and she’s regarded as more infallible - her point of view) power, authority and leverage over him. Being labeled as the "head" or "leader" doesn't necessarily mean having actual, substantive authority, especially if that authority can be revoked at any time or if others have more legal or social power over you. Genuine authority implies the ability to make binding decisions, exercise control, and maintain influence over others without constant threat of losing that power. If a husband’s leadership or headship is contingent on the approval of the wife and can be overridden or revoked easily, then that authority is not genuine in the strictest sense. It's more symbolic or conditional, dependent on the consent or deference of the wife being "led." The husband is merely the “nominal head of his wife”. Authentic leadership or authority typically requires not only a title or role but also the legal, social, or institutional backing that secures one's ability to act independently and enforce decisions. If that backing is weak or revocable at will, the authority is essentially limited or superficial. This aligns with the idea that true authority is stable and not easily subject to removal unless under extraordinary circumstances. Otherwise, the husband’s “headship” or leadership is nominal, lacking real decision-making power or control. On the contrary the wife wields significantly greater power and dominance over the husband through fear/ legal intimidation so that he doesn’t step out of line. Since the wife has the unilateral authority to exact legal penalties, it does imply a form of hierarchical dominance. This is because the ability to impose consequences without requiring consent or approval from the other party - the husband (via no fault divorce) indicates an unequal distribution of power and authority. In such a scenario, the party with the power to exact penalties (the wife) holds a dominant position over the husband, who is subject to those penalties without having reciprocal control. The court system seems to operate on the notion “whatever primarily benefits Eve’s self-interests despite however corrupt” It’s ironic we get persistently force fed the idea that women are somehow more innately empathetic.
Men have abused their “power“ and therefore it has been taken away. It seems like maybe you’ve been very hurt by a woman in the past and I’m sorry for that. I understand where you’re coming from.
@@rachelelizabeth5416 Perhaps you need to re-read what he wrote, because there is a lot of logical and legal fact in what he said, especially in light of church promotion of "headship" in some quarters, which really is a vain attempt at making religious morals and ideas about marriage relevant in a society where marriage is a product of the State. Whether men abused power in the past is irrelevant to what society faces today, just as the dating and marriage standards of the 1950's are irrelevant to life today. One has to deal with today's issues from today's perspective, and today's issues -- after 50 years of feminist influence in laws and social structures -- are much different from those that dominated most of the last century. For example, today 60% of men between 18-30 are single and aren't even dating. Also statistically, 60% of the women in the same age range are all dating the same 20% of men. The average marriage lasts 8.3 years and only 25% of the remaining marriages are happy ones. Less couples are having children. These are real issues that have nothing to do with what happened 50 years ago, and society will experience the results of the present day issues whether people like it or not. When the OP mentioned that "headship" and "authority" is not substantial or real because it can be so easily revoked by his wife filing papers and the ensuing court divorce orders (and TRO's, many of which are trumped up to gain the wife a better legal position in the divorce), he's actually correct: it's not real 'headship' or 'authority' at all, but a sham version -- a facade. Most men have figured this out. They know that if they marry there is statistically more than a 50% chance their wife will file papers within 8-9 years, and churches have no clue how to remedy this even for the dwindling numbers of men in their congregations. Even Christian men have figured this out. They're told all this BS about headship -- but they know the reality, that the State ultimately determines whether you actually have 'authority' in marriage or not. The reality is that you don't. You are correct that men's "power" has been taken away -- it's been removed from the family. And in greater society, women have much more freedom, and that is a good thing. But men still have power -- over their own lives, and over their own choices. And they are using that to survive.
Quite often I hear the “state” has destroyed marriage. Do lawyers and judges “force” women to emotionally, psychologically and financially eviscerate the lives of their ex-husbands? Or is it female empathy which does that? Women do that by their own free will. Case in point, if I could get away with theft, I’d still be a thief - a felon criminal. Just because the state empowers me to commit theft doesn’t make me any less of a thief in the event that that I do commit theft. Likewise with women filing for divorce in countries like China, USA, Russia, UK, Australia 70-83%+ of divorces are filed by them. As much of an abomination that gay marriage and transgenderism are the breakdown of society is due to invalid divorces, and the majority of invalid divorces also happen to be initiated by society’s “protected” special sacred cows albeit straight women.
Fr Ripperger, please do a speech on “nice guys’” vs “kind” men. There is a huge difference. Kind men will sacrifice for their wives and children. The nice guy has a boat or golf or hunt club membership. Discern the difference gals or live an isolated, oppressed life.
I was a sahm until my husband left. My youngest was 3 months old. After that I worked as a single mom. Men need to be the spiritual head of their households that they are called to be and quit leaving it to the women to do.
I married a man who I thought was a leader, strong and head of our family (military for a decade). As soon as he found out what I was capable of, he quit working, and i supported us, the house, his children, cooked, cleaned, did all the laundry, etc. I begged him to get a job bc we were drowning. He refused. We had a miracle baby, and a year later, he completely abandoned us. If I didn't step up, we'd have lost everything. Now, he's living with a woman half his age, the age of his eldest, and HER child (who is our child's age). I grew up, and still have, traditional values. I have a degree in psychology/sociology and special education. I do NOT agree with this feminist movement. We have different strengths naturally. It's been the most difficult last 2 years. I think the world has made our men so effeminate and I don't know how to pray that out. I've been praying for 1.5 years for his conversion and return to my daughter and I ... this really hit home. I just don't know what else to do about it.
@catherineobrien-mchue1388 exactly right. I pray daily but wow. The infidelity, the mental anguish, the refusal to get help and worst of all, the pain they inflict on our children. I will pray for you, if that's ok?
I hear many trad wives are left alone. It's dangerous when your life is dictated by people who have no stakes in it. I like the trad movement, but all these trad channels are run by men, hours and hours behind a microphone and camera, editing, etc... In the mean time, who is doing the endless life chores? Is not as if youtube pays millions for them to provide
St Paul is often cut short. He actually said that wives should submit to their husband. Husbands should love their wives as Jesus loved His church and died for her If I ever find that man who will love me enough to die for love of me, you can be sure that I will submit. Until then, I submit to Jesus only.
You'll be looking a long time then. Because what Paul told wives to do is not conditioned upon what he told husbands to do. What you suggest is the ideal, but the commands / instructions given to both spouses by St. Paul do not hinge on what the other spouse does or doesn't do.
@@ssllylawrence618 True, people weren't stamped out of some factory somewhere. We all have our faults. That said, there is a difference between establishing a rubric for imperfect people, and trying to apply the ideal that way, and denying that the 'ideal' was ever written in Scripture, or completely rewriting it to fit modern day society. Once one ideal is rewritten, they all can be. And I think that -- for better or for worse -- we see a lot of that happening today in churches.
@@lwest46 Nowhere in scripture does any Apostle condone domestic (or other) violence, from anyone. Nowhere. Especially when dealing with Christians, regardless of the setting. The Scriptures were intended for Christians, and Christians aren't supposed to settle their differences with violence. Period. That should be a given when dealing with these verses. Violence and ill treatment of others goes against everything Christ and the Apostles taught Christians to be. The verses about the roles of husband and wife hinge on those other edicts -- to be humble, patient, love others, etc.
Rebellion is the devils perrorgative, Typical is the Jezebel Spirit, the problem with the Church of Thyatira, (that behind the Protestant reformation rather rebellion) Even as the prophecy says " Those who have not known the depths of satan " I will give him the Morning Star-- The Antidote of the Jezebel Spirit,, It does suggest that the Jezebel teaching have to do with the depths of satan,
Women are wanting a perfect man to support everything and are all looking for a St Joseph. Yet they are not Mary. The current society, we can do our best but unfortunately it’s not enough for the women these days. That’s even for us men going to FSSP mass.
I think Hildebrand’s philosophy really touches on the idea of “ natural inclinations” the problem is a lack of ability to respond to proper value and or have a response at all in a feminine or masculine way .. values in this case being masculinity or femininity .. Yeah it’s the culture .. but there are other reasons too..screens and television are one …
I wonder if Eve would of separated from Adam if he was more patriarchal? Asking for a friend. PS Thinking no, because she had no government or other man to protect her.
Don't blame women for the communist/luciferian scheme to separate men and women and parents and children. The communists, in their stated 48 goals of communism, wanted to bring women outside the home so they could more readily indoctrinate and attack the vulnerable children. Defeating Christianity is much simpler if mothers and fathers are not present to teach and model the faith to their children.
Ok grasshopper, I shall try to help you understand, since you didn't get the pebble from my hand. Eve always has her autonomy. She chose wrong. Adam chose to do wrong with her. He should not have. He should of grabbed the bad fruit from her hand and burned it. That way she could have the autonomy of not having death entering into the world.
O MARIA… - “I have noticed that the devil seeks first of all, with any excuse, to deprive his victim of the MIRACULOUS MEDAL of the IMMACULATA. Once he has donet that, the rest will come very easy to him.” †St. Maximilian M. Kolbe (her littlest knight), ora pro nobis
All forms of the mass can be reverent. But unfortunately most priests don’t understand or aren’t willing to take a stance as to why reverence is necessary. I’m thankful to have a priest at our parish who understands this.
@@RussCornwall-un3spReverence is always key , but Unfortunately the Novus Ordo is inherently flawed by the methodology for its creation … that of overlapping Protestantism like worship practices with an intermixing of elements of the True Mass of the Ages . Confusion is sown , and these begets confusion to this very day .
Women are waiting to submit...they want to submit, but there must be a leader and if the husband cant or wont lead, then women must step forward... I am catholic...before i divorced my husband we went to a priest for counseling...he said i needed to let my husband lead...i did...he overdrew the band account...the electricity was turned off ( he neglected the bills) One car was reposessed...i had to lead to survive...we divorced...got an annulment and 10 years later i married a man ( Catholic) and he was a leader...We were married nearly 40 years until he died...he was the light of my life...we were both consecrated to Our Lady...that matters too
@@wolfkingsigma2795 "societal observations"-->your own experience of life who is not even a millionth good enough to describe what happens in the world
@@planteruines5619 Insults behind a keyboard? OK SIMP GOOFBALL CUCK. Be your own fool with eyes blinded over. May you find your needle in the haystack in modern female culture. Good luck.
The case for Patriarchy needs to account for the modern misapprehension regarding what Patriarchy is and how to implement a Patriarchy at home and in the business world sensitive to modern psychological and emotional needs. Its a very worthy project. A development of Patriarchy theology of St Thomas Aquinas is also a worthy enterprise.
@@RubenWalsh-iv5ik The modern western world is psychologically deformed through feminism and a deformed sexuality through contraception. The Patriarchy intellectual movement needs to be sensitive to the legitimate needs of men and woman subject to the modern deformed culture, initially changed and reformed by a legitimate Patriarchal society.
I hate to say it but the most evil women I've met are actually misogynistic. For example, my ex mother in law (I mistakenly or misguidedly married a muslim who forcably sodomized me and as a result I had to divorce) would literally bring my ex husband money to go to prostitutes everytime she visited us. My mother also- hated other women but claimed to be submissive. Before Susan B Anthony's early feminism, 1 out of 20 (or more) women in NYC were prostitutes. Please please for one address the iceberg of the sin of misogyny. It's big, it's often hidden and to be honest, feminists at least stand up to some of the misogyny.
Yeah, Catholics aren't misogynistic. Feminists don't stand up to misogyny; they muddy the water and call patriarchy misogyny. Catholics developed chivalry. Of course people living outside the grace of God will live lives that are disordered.
It's shocking that your mother in law would do such a thing. Narcissistic men are often very close to their toxic mothers. Sounds similar. Yes, many women dislike other women. There are hidden resentments, jealous feelings, even sabotage in female friendships. I rather stay on my own for that reason. I'm kind, offer help and concern for female friends, but its seldom returned.
I feel sorry for what you got through. Do not expect from this kind of religious ppl to address misogyny, they have a very specific agenda. Pray to God to give you discernment to find your own spiritual kin. Do lve your life with responsibility -its life who teaches us in person, not any idle youtube preachers. Let these ppl (men and many women) fight their own demons (feminism, modernism, communism or whatever). Live your life in full, God bless you
In my opinion, the indispensible treatment the Patriarchy received in the Old Testament and the rigidity of the laws that maintained it gave way in some respects as other disciplines did with the fulfillment of the law accomplished by Jesus. God taking on human nature as a man born of a perfect woman, one that He created with such perfection and graced with such gifts that He could submit Himself to her, turned, one could say, things upside down(The Magnificat). This was not done to negate Divine Order but to signal a change, a change needed , the change of the heart that Jesus so emphasized. The Pharisees were the epitome of Patriarchy but managed to continually stir the ire of Jesus. They could obey all laws to the t and still not be saved. The vestiges of sin that remain with us until Jesus comes again cause the loss of souls and we should discipline ourselves with humility to prevent it, but in Christ, women as well as men are justified. Jesus is the new Adam and Mary is the new Eve. A husband and wife, most importantly, should be equally yoked and work for the salvation of each other and that of their children. Otherwise, there will be bitterness that will transfer to the children and cause the social and psychological problems spoken of. Finger pointing never works( the plank in the eye). Again, my comments are my opinions.
@@vw5056yes, there are some many feminist assumptions operating in the software, they are some common and accepted now. Like how a fish does not know what water js
Adam was essentially a cuck. Had he reprimanded Eve for her sin he'd have likely found favor with God. How many times have we heard modern men say things such as "happy wife, happy life?" Same thing. This type of beta behavior is not Godly. That's why i blame both rebellious (feminist) women and weak men who won't put their foot down.
TG begins the show by stating that he and Fr Ripperger are very much alike. I thought, "Really, is Fr. Ripperger a narcissist, too?" I guess so, because the two of them spend the whole video talking about themselves. I had only decided to listen to this because I thought some issues would be covered. The last time I listened to R4R was about Vatican II where TG blamed the failures of Vatican II on feminism! But there were no women at Vatican II! It was all priests. Finally, during the last half minute of this video Fr Ripperger said something substantiative, that the Curse of Adam was that men are unwilling to be responsible and unwilling to suffer. That's sort of the way I see Adam in the Garden, but I would describe him as selfish and manipulative. For most of history, people have been blaming Eve solely for the fall. But Adam was fully involved. Popular art and movies, for example, often depict Adam as being somewhere else when Eve partook. The popular movie of the '60s, "The Bible," for example shows Adam in another area of the Garden, and Eve brings him the apple of which she has already partook. But the Bible says clearly that Adam was right at Eve's side when she partook. (And we're not talking about an apple here, that's just a metaphor for sex and occultism that the Devil used.) So why didn't Adam speak up and do something? Fr. Ripperger and TG would say it was because he was weak, didn't take authority, yada, yada. I think Adam didn't speak up because he wanted to see if Eve would die first before he partook. After all, God had promised that "on the day. . ." they partook, Adam and Eve would surely die. Adam wanted to use Eve as a guinea pig. He was just as greedy and power hungry as Eve, but didn't want to endanger himself. And when he saw she survived, he then partook himself. But Adam didn't know how God was defining a day. In God's timeline, a day is as a thousand years. And Adam did indeed die at almost a thousand years of age. What makes me believe Adam was this underhanded, a toothless rat, as it were? His own words tell me that. When God found them out and confronted them, Adam retorted the he never would have sinned had it not been "for that woman you gave me." So Adam blamed Eve, and, by extension, God, because God created Eve. So at least Eve confessed. Hers is called the first confession. She said that the Devil had tempted her, "but I did eat." But I don't think that either Adam or Eve ever repented. At least it's not mentioned that they did so. So God should have gotten two confessions and two repentences. But he only got one confession.
You obviously never heard Fr Ripperger's talk on the fall of Adam and Eve. He never says that Adam never sinned. In fact, he says just the opposite in that talk.
Tim loves himself so much its hilarious. He constantly pouts at the camera and adjusts his hair more than any woman ive ever seen!!! His wife cannot say 1 single sentence without giggling like a child. I watch this for pute comedic value 😂😂😂
I suppose I am a 'feminist' as in a female who is single independent owns a home, car...so I have the responsibility of taking care of myself. Retired RN, so took care of others for years including an elderly mother. I have learned to use tools, changed spark plugs, a little plumbing - it's called survival with God as my savior. When I listen to 2 men try to define women....well it's definitely from an inexperienced point of view. Good look fellow men on trying to figure out women. Sometimes I think God made us for your entertainment, be it laughter or putting you down on your knees praying to God for relief.
@@RulesForRetrogrades I admire Father Ripperger's work, his words are bringing light and true guidance to many. I am however very surprised and saddened by this disrespectful answer to a lady viewer. Even if this woman tries to contradict your talkshow, is it really necessary to answer in such an aggressive way ? I doubt Father Ripperger would approve of it.
So…rather than marring a man at your station, you wasted your youth getting ran thru by one randy Doctor after another, thinking you could lock them down with your sassy gumption??
@@RulesForRetrogradesPerhaps you boxing in women into a box of your liking is calming for you to collect your mind. I don't disagree with women who live by what they stand for I think it is disrespectful to try to place all into your idea of how they should live and relate to men. If you actually knew the Aramaic translation of the Bible you may understand differently.
Where are tbe strong men? The family leaders? The men who pray and take care of their families? Women don't want to Be men, some have to take on that role bevsuse the men don't want to.
Unfortunately these days, many young men are taught that these positive male attributes are "toxic". It's a lose-lose-lose situation. We need to teach boys and men that being strong and protective and masculine are good things!
@@nicolamustard7232 I consider that an excuse. The young males are allowed to indulge themselves with video games and porn (both of which are pushed by communists/luciferians). Children who are given cell phones and computers with internet access are being exposed to porn (including violent porn) starting at the age of 8 -- parents need to understand this evil. No women that I know are teaching young men that being mature, responsible, protective and working for the family is "toxic".
What percentage of fatherlessness is due to women leveraging corrupt courts to physically remove the presence of their children’s fathers from the lives of their children? Father ripperger and Timothy just said 80-95% of trad con women have emasculated their husbands. What do you mean where are all the strong men? What’s women’s level of moral agency compared to men’s? That’s the right question to ask.
I’m in my soft guy era” = the realization that what’s the point of manning up and carrying the extra burden and weight of responsibility if you can just basically be a “woman” in some sense and be entitled to the same equal benefits and advantages of manning up without actually having to man up.
I think with regards to the men’s right to the marital act the men need to go first. They need to be responsible and willing to suffer. My husband was watching porn and I always felt I HAD to, you know, because of the Bible. But I was reading this book on angels and when I finished it I felt like I received a message that I didn’t have to. And so it’s been years and years and I just don’t want to. He also was abusive verbally and I prayed and prayed and prayed but I never felt license from God to leave him. Even I thought he was trying to poison me and in prayer about it I think Jesus said, “Let him.” (I’ve been careful with him around my food, I keep an eye on it all the time out of habit, but I also think God is keeping me alive). And once at mass he thinks God told him, “I will remake you.” So I keep waiting and he’s been fairly reliable about not verbally abusing me. But I don’t believe him when he says he doesn’t use porn. That’s what I’m waiting for, I think, plus for him to integrate with the family. The kids really love him and wouldn’t understand if I left.
“I felt like I received a message…”. A message that what? That You could break the natural law, and your marriage vows, forcing your husband into Celibacy, which is not a gift given to him by God in his vocation as a married man. No lady, God does not allow you to just abrogate your duty b/c you had a feeling from an angel book, lol. Are you sure this is not a power play in the relationship, that you have not succumb to temptation of a spirit of usurper?
Twice in OP you say that you heard the voice of God. understand that people receiving messages from God is EXTREMELY rare. It happens to a few in some rare circumstances but we are to be skeptical of any alleged inner or outer and we are not to judge these thing all on our own outside of spiritual direction… Also, your discussion of him poisoning you makes me suspect you may have some mental health issues… jus saying you should probably not take these vpices so seriously…
…and we should NEVER heed any such voices that tell us to to do wrong. Deciding to, categorically, and for YEARS, refuse to do the marital duty is a sin, an infidelity to your marriage vows and a GRAVE uncharity. you need to confess this, you need to divulge exactly how long this has been going on of you unilaterally deciding to end all intimacy. And you need not only apologize to God but to your husband and do penance…
…and regarding his (hopefully former) porn use, yes this is a serious problem and it can have a negative impact in the bedroom, and even beyond just the distress it causes you and it absolutely needs to stop. That is for him to work out with the grace of the sacrament of confession. Even if he still may…do it himself sometimes, he needs to leave the porn out of it as the first and most critical step in a journey towards self mastery. But you also need to consider how you are imperiling both his and your souls with this abandonment and ursupation. I really cant believe I am having to explain this to a Christian woman that you can not just arbitrarily decide to make him wait and wait and suffer endlessly. You are basically driving him to sin, are being incredibly derilict and uncharitable. You will have to answer to the Almighty for all of this…
…You need to divulge all of this in detail in the confessional ASAP. You cant just to say: “id like to confess being arbitrarily unavailable to my husband on more than one occasion.” That would be deceptive and a sacrilege. You need to explain EXACTLY what you have done to your marriage and for how long this has been going on! I will be praying for your family tonight. God Bless you all, and may God have mercy on your husband, and especially on you… Sincerely.
You lost me at 6:11. You wasted *MY* time because you failed to get to the point of the discussion. AND because you were too busy patting yourself on the back. AND flattering your guest was more important to you than serving the needs of your customers. Don't waste my time kid.
Well now, isn't that an informed, intellectual response by a Christian Catholic author ?! I'm writing on Healing Diabolic Narcissisism in the Church, care to have me on?@@RulesForRetrogrades
@@RulesForRetrogrades My dude, take the L on this one. You did take a lot of time to get to the discussion and spent too much on defending originality. Not throwing shade, just an observation. Appreciate what you do.
At some point, one must wonder if certain individuals are cognizant of the fact that they are actively attempting to turn half of the population away from Christianity due to the distortion of Christian teachings they are disseminating? I fully believe these individuals need to be more careful and should realize that they WILL one day be held accountable for every soul they may have turned away from Christ in their hubris. From the perspective of some of us, such individuals are just as wrong as the Fr. James Martins of the world.
Great point. Instead of helping young men with their actual issues (gaming, p&rn addiction, loneliness, violence) they add up to the incel culture. However, these clerics are quite few thankfully. Catholic Church has done a lot to overcome her past demons and be more inclusive. The problem is much more flagrant within the Orthodox (s)-
This perspective sounds a lot like deflecting blame. It seems like immoral or bad men are trying to point a finger and blame it on women when ultimately it comes down to individual responsibility. It’s kind of sad because honestly, both genders are responsible for a lot of bad. Men lost their power because they abused it and women are now losing their femininity because they’re abusing their gain of power. And the family suffers. And on and on it goes. My husband, who is the head of the household, does an amazing job of being the head of the household without making me feel like a subject. He deserves my submission because he is a good man who is leading me to holiness and I gladly give it to him however, he does respect me, my body and my mind. It’s definitely a two-way street. The way this RUclipsr talks seems dangerously close to the “women are cattle” notion. I don’t think I’m going to listen to anymore of his videos. It’s disappointing that Father Ripperger was on here.
@@rachelelizabeth5416 if you actually read the original feminists you'd understand that gaining power and losing femininity was what feminism was all about. Losing femininity, as femininity used to be defined, was intrinsic to freeing women from the prisons of motherhood and marriage. Women had to be freed from motherhood and marriage to be fully independent persons, and achieve their full potential as individuals. And we're seeing the results of that today. Is it a problem? Only if you still hold morals and values from the 1950's or earlier.
@@chriscampbell9191 You're not up to date on this. New stats just dropped this year on this topic. It's the opposite, in fact. Women are leaving churches in unprecedented numbers now. In Gen Z there are more men than women in church and women are leaving the faith, and how women are treated is one of the biggest factors cited. One definitely sees this in Orthodoxy (we call them Orthobros) and in more traditional Catholic parishes (more younger men than younger women). If you spend any time whatsoever in online religious forums you'll see a trend of young men being very toxic against women and also simultaneously wondering why there are no women around to date in church. Topics I've seen personally from random young men (repeatedly) concerned with whether women are wearing head coverings, how women dress, whether or not women should be allowed to commune whilst menstruating, whether women can kiss icons whilst menstruating, whether or not women should even go to college, how Russia getting rid of all of their domestic violence laws is based and not a problem, the surprise that there aren't many women in their churches, how their girlfriends/wives (if they have them) are not interested In Orthodoxy after they've been pushing for the lack of women's autonomy and rights, etc. On the other hand, these guys are the definition of folks who are so into aesthetics that they've completely forgotten about the person of Christ. They need Jesus in the worst way.
I agree. In the East we have a word that exemplifies what's going on here, called prelest. It's a state where one mistakenly believes that they are more holy and less sinful than they actually are.
I do not at all see the vice of Pride in these two Catholic gentlemen (one ordained, one laity). They have similar interests and are sharing the things upon which they are working. There was very little actual self-referencial commentary, and no hint of boasting. The supposed vice, i just cannot see it. C'mon, give these men a break...
The decline of the west is mostly attributed to the special, sacred cows of society - women. Women are the true leaders of society into perdition like Eve. Men like Adam are their followers.
@@silverback3382Adam actually had the first sin - where was he? Why was he not there protecting Eve? That was his primary role - protector- and he failed and so it goes throughout history.
Reality check: Even in some of the most traditional, conservative, pious, religious Christian homes (the last hold outs in this Age of Eve AoE), the husband doesn’t actually have any true headship or authority because when push comes to shove the wife generally has exclusive legal (corrupt gynocentric/ Eve-centric courts) and social (court of public opinion, within the context of relationships the women’s account is more readily believed and she’s regarded as more infallible - her point of view) power, authority and leverage over him. Being labeled as the "head" or "leader" doesn't necessarily mean having actual, substantive authority, especially if that authority can be revoked at any time or if others have more legal or social power over you. Genuine authority implies the ability to make binding decisions, exercise control, and maintain influence over others without constant threat of losing that power. If a husband’s leadership or headship is contingent on the approval of the wife and can be overridden or revoked easily, then that authority is not genuine in the strictest sense. It's more symbolic or conditional, dependent on the consent or deference of the wife being "led." The husband is merely the “nominal head of his wife”. Authentic leadership or authority typically requires not only a title or role but also the legal, social, or institutional backing that secures one's ability to act independently and enforce decisions. If that backing is weak or revocable at will, the authority is essentially limited or superficial. This aligns with the idea that true authority is stable and not easily subject to removal unless under extraordinary circumstances. Otherwise, the husband’s “headship” or leadership is nominal, lacking real decision-making power or control. On the contrary the wife wields significantly greater power and dominance over the husband through fear/ legal intimidation so that he doesn’t step out of line. Since the wife has the unilateral authority to exact legal penalties, it does imply a form of hierarchical dominance. This is because the ability to impose consequences without requiring consent or approval from the other party - the husband (via no fault divorce) indicates an unequal distribution of power and authority. In such a scenario, the party with the power to exact penalties (the wife) holds a dominant position over the husband, who is subject to those penalties without having reciprocal control. The court system seems to operate on the notion “whatever primarily benefits Eve’s self-interests despite however corrupt” It’s ironic we get persistently force fed the idea that women are somehow more innately empathetic. What percentage of women who initiate divorce psychologically, emotionally and financially eviscerate the lives of the husbands? Paternity fraud, child custody, alimony, child support + without having to prove how they spend it, his assets - the fruits of his labor, his toil. They say men have become soft and too weak to fight in battles. On the contrary men still fight in battles, the battlefield has shifted from the outdoors into family courts. No lawyer forces women full child custody or forces her to keep the fruits of his labor. This whole notion of female empathy runs counter to reality. Then you have abortion. It only makes sense why 95% of households have become feminist, because men are afraid of a very real threat subconsciously at best. What percentage of this crisis of fatherlessness is caused by women leveraging the corrupt courts to physically remove the presence of fathers from the lives of their children? Even in homes men have retreated into man caves. Proverbs 21:9 states, "It is better to live in a corner of the housetop than in a house shared with a quarrelsome wife". I could be wrong but it seems like a substantial portion young “trad con” women seeking to get married view their prospective husbands as some sort of resource acquisition that they feel entitled to have and to manage and direct, rather than to truly follow their husbands as means of getting their “misbegotten and defective” (to quote St. Thomas Aquinas) behinds into heaven The only true authority that husbands have these days is moral authority and they’ll have this moral authority until the end of time; however, this moral authority is rarely preached in churches but it will be actualized on judgment day when wives have to pay an account as to how they “followed” their husbands like how the church - the bride - is to follow Christ.
Please do not blame women for the evils of communism/luciferianism that have been imposed by the ruling luciferian cult that Jesus identified in the Book of Revelation (2:9 and 3:9) -- imposed through secular education, entertainment, porn, abortion, unjust laws and corrupt courts.
Men really have no 'authority', except over themselves, and themselves alone. Churches' teachings on 'headship' and 'authority' in marriage and family are a weak attempt at being relevant in a society where the Laws of the State are paramount, and will always prevail in marriage and family.
@@lwest46 We had a version of 'patriarchy' (under the feminist definition) until the 1970's, and believe you me, women before then were thought of as a lot more than just 'mindless breeders'. They were respected as wives and mothers, and their opinions were respected also. Ask anyone who lived back in the early 20th Century how things were. They weren't a panacea, but they weren't all abusive marriages, either. Feminism is what Betty Friedan and others taught. The advancement of women by freeing them from the old morals, freeing them from being tied permanently marriage and motherhood, and freeing them from familial responsibilities if they so choosed. Along with that there were calls for equal pay, equal opportunity, and completely equal rights under the law. So it wasn't just one thing, but the marriage and motherhood aspects were important because they held women back. In 1980 they were even calling for the family to be redefined, to accommodate women's desires to be all they can be in business and other pursuits -- if they so choosed. Judges get involved in the majority of marriages, because the divorce rate is well over 50%, most marriages only last 8.3 years, and even Catholic commentators recognise those statistics -- so divorce is pertinent to the conversation, especially when 70% of them are filed by the wife. And you seem to be equating Biblical 'headship' -- of the husband -- in the family with abuse and bullying, two things which Paul was completely against (Ephesians 5:25, and also Ephesians 6:4)). And where did St. Paul say women can't do tasks like drive or hold a job? That said, St. Paul wrote what he wrote for a reason. There had to have been a reason he wrote, at least three or four times, that wives are to submit to their husbands. We didn't write it -- he did. We may not agree with it today, and we may not like it, but it's still Scripture, and Paul (and Peter) wrote it. Of course, none of this matters, because the Laws of the State will always prevail, as well as the customs and morals of today's society. We get the society we live in.
@@lwest46 I never said they were idyllic, but your average family in the 50's, 40's, and before then wasn't the way you describe things, either. The fact is, no polling survey institute ever polled all families back in the early 20th Century because polling didn't really exist until the late 1950's and early 1960's. Betty Friedan wrote a book full of anecdotes that were portrayed to represent all suburban and married women. More than half the book is full of them. Yet the women in the anecdotes were all under therapy of some sort. They were not the typical suburban, married housewife in America at that time. The book was based on an extrapolation of the statistically few women Friedan encountered. Yet her conclusions were accepted as gospel truth by millions, and she was the mother of a movement which results we all live with today -- modern feminism has shaped modern society in ways that we still are seeing play out. Whenever I tune into Catholic radio, the subjects they complain about the most -- broken homes, divorce, absent fathers, abortion, etc. -- all can be traced in some way to feminism. I'm not exaggerating here, it's just fact. I've read the literature, I was raised by a feminist, I know clearly what the movement stood for and stands for -- good or bad. I think churches in general are lost when it comes to dealing with these things. Bringing back 'patriarchy' not only wouldn't work, it simply will never, ever happen. But churches have to be able to identify the source of a problem if they truly want to deal with it, and attempt to solve it. I don't' see that happening. Agreed on extremism. It seems to be endemic in society these days. [Edited for a left out word, and a typo]
Suppose a wife wants to divorce and her husband wants to see his children regularly while his wife leverages the courts to eviscerate his life (financially and psychologically). Are you suggesting that most women who keep sole child custody are basically subhuman completely bereft of empathy?
This guy probably has nuanced views on trump, (and many of those backing him). Regardless, this guy obviously does not the idea of ANY woman beibg president
@@johnanon658Yes it does. And maybe stupid men should concern themselves with the state of masculinity…men are more like beasts than human these days. Leave women alone and sort your own sick selves out.
Unfortunately, for women to be able to trust their husbands enough to be able to submit to them, the husbands would need to be more aligned with the teachings of the faith....HOWEVER...what is MUCH overlooked is the original cause of feminism...AND THAT BEING that husbands have abused AND NEGLECTED their role in a marriage (as taught by example by ST. JOSEPH AND THE FAITH). FEMINISM is a response to the fault, NOT vice versa . And until men are responsible enough to play their roles in what it means to be a husband...(ie- role model ST. JOSEPH-he never mistreated Mary....) women can't submit to men who don't follow the teachings of Christ, and fundamentally, lead a family into chaos and decay. I do not agree with all of the feminism views, but-i can understand why it is so strong of a response to the abusive, mistreating, cheating husbands of the past...(among other issues)...sooo...until guys are held responsible for their faults in bringing about feminism...order in the family unit WILL NOT be restored.
Op, you seem to be coming up with some generalized justification to not submit to your husband, as if any of the alleged crimes of “men” in the past justify your attitude. Or, are you even married?
That is not the cause of feminism. The elites that rule our societies are the cause of feminism. They want to inflate the currency, put more of that money in their own pockets. But they can't do that if families are single income homes. They have to trick women into working. They have to trick everybody into accepting the new paradigm. They created feminism to fool you into thinking slavery is empowering. And it worked. My grandfather could support a family of seven kids on a taxi drivers wage. Now families struggle to support one kid with both parents working. Why do you think that is?
@@johnanon658 And the original sin was that of Adam. The instruction not to eat the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was given to Adam before Eve was formed. Adam failed in his duty to protect his bride Eve and he failed in his obligation to God to not eat of the forbidden fruit. So men are the first to fail in their duty as spiritual leader and protector. A true leader serves his bride -- just as Christ, the true leader, served His Church and continues to do so today.
@@johnanon658 haha...I could have been deceived into a marriage where my husband follows satan...I WILL NOT, and AM NOT obliged to obey...I will take my chances and obey Christ, instead....THE ORIGINAL BRIDE-GROOM... sooo... no. It is not an excuse, AND it's also NOT a cop out for husbands to use that to do what ever the hell they want in a marriage and control and abuse their wives and children. Learn to be like Christ!...if a husband is not obligated to follow what's right, they are the original breakers of the vow...and breach of contract.
@@rccyberwarrior2267 AMEN!...finally!!...men have for soooo long used women as scapegoats for their faults!!...always focusing on the sin of Eve to divert taking responsibility for their own actions, and they back this up by paragraphs in scripture to justify their means, instead of conveying the entire message. I used to have an issue with the whole wives obey your husbands...until I learned the whole story...women ARE supposed to obey their husbands, BECAUSE husbands are supposed to act like Christ!!!...WHO wouldn't obey someone who's got your back to the point of laying their life down for you???...OF COURSE I would trust that person WITH MY LIFE (like we are called to do in Christ...as the church, as well)...BUT, let's get real...how many husbands are in compliance with this scenerio??...(and...let's not forget, if they have let in the evil one into their life via sin ( we all sin), the husband can be influenced to bring about destruction to the wife and the whole family....so...I think there has to be some context formed here, about this general rule of obeying the husband...
I’m fully aware of the feminist movement and how destructive it is. However… Adam failed to protect Eve from the serpent. So where does the blame actually start?
@@RulesForRetrogrades…Okay…Yes we took the bite and convinced Adam to do the same…but…as man is to protect and lead their families….you would think that would’ve been an equal bad. When Adam should have not allowed the serpent in and protect Eve. I know it sounds like I’m being a jerk…I’m honestly not trying to. I will 100% admit the feminist movement has destroyed the family. I’m still trying to brake that mindset …because, being born in 1973, I am a product from the hippies and feminine revolution. I also don’t consider myself evil because I’m a woman. I’m truly trying to live out my roll as a woman. I failed at being a stay at home mother…instead took a career. You’re going to love this one…. My career is a police officer. With that being said both my daughters are married and stay at home mothers. I did strongly encourage that.
@@RulesForRetrogrades Don't forget that God made the covenant with Adam, not Eve. The real sin occurred when Adam went along with it. Also, because of the fall and how God used the BVM, the devil has made a concerted effort to be extremely evil against all women.
@@RulesForRetrogrades Just stating “The church fathers disagree” isn’t a great answer. ‘The church fathers’ are hardly going to accept culpability are they? Being as sinful and imperfect as the rest of us. What might the church mothers say? 🤣
... and this is why St Paul advised it is better not to marry. I wish I'd listened to him 😂 25 years with an abusive closeted gay man was enough and the Lord guided me safely out of it. You guys are so prescriptive, like the pharisees.
Father,please receive conditional traditional Rite Ordination from a Resistance-SSPX or Thuc line Bishop. Bishop Williamson,Father Moylan,and this Priest,are the only clerics who condemn Feminism.
To me it is masculine and unattractive, we want women who are better than us to keep us grounded, we will go out and take on the world don't want the ways of the world to infect my home as well
You know, since Adam and Eve, men have been blaming women for their problems and refusing to take responsibility for their own shortcomings. Nothing changes. Adam and Eve were equal partners in the Fall; we both sinned. We both have to make it up . And right now, the patriarchy is not working for the church. Only men can be priests, but men are not stepping up to the plate. So if you want patriarchy, then you, ie men, are going to have to do something about that. So sort it.
You just said Adam and Eve were equal partners and then proceeded to blame men. Also this video is talking not only about feminism but about effeminate men.
I'm in RCIA w/ 2 female teachers. Does anyone know if this is permitted? Something seems off and they were soft on mortal sin saying it's very hard to commit it, and that you should "feel" during Mass, if you should receive the Eucharist. Advice is very appreciated.
Male RCIA teacher here. You shouldn’t receive the Eucharist in a state of mortal sin. Mortal sin needs to meet these conditions: grave, know it is wrong, and do it anyway. It is easier to commit than most of us think. Do not be driven by feelings, but instead use your intellect and will to make a conscious decision. Feelings are fleeting, especially when God challenge us in life. Good luck in your spiritual journey. God bless.
@@steveb5331 Thank you for the great response. I objected to their teachings by saying that you should mistrust yourself and your feelings and look to Church teachings instead... They didn't buy it. I dislike going to RCIA because of this... even though I love our faith. I dislike being told by women about our faith in this manner. Do you recommend me to keep going there? God bless.
Since Eve gave a wrong advice to Adam, I never had confidence in women wanting to govern. If married she should put her priority to her family. I'm a woman and I know why some women are evil...Eve always comes up in my mind.
@@crevecouer6772 Ok I am a widow and was married for many years to a strong man. He was kind and generous, he saw the good. His first wife died and he raised his two daughters very well. He was highly intelligent and wise. We never quibbled over who does what as our relationship was built on respect and love. A strong man is one whose foundation is Christ and who acts and behaved as Christ would.
Your analysis is off. The snake isn't the woman, the snake is Satan. Woman isn't Satan, she is human. And men aren't blind, they are cowardly. The nature of women has been corrupted by original sin to want to control. And the nature of men has been corrupted by original sin to cede control.
I'm a career woman, out of obligation, many working women would much rather be at home w their children, the working world isn't a nice place, men always knew it
They created it to be like that.
@@m.935nope not true , women can be even more savage trust me
@@jeanniefelix6534 EXACTLY. most women were thrust into the workplace OUT OF NECESSITY...whether it'd be a cheating, abusive husband, or abandonment, or lack of responsibility, or even death...I am NOT blaming ALL husbands (God bless and keep the good ones out there!- BUT- the good ones are not fundamentally the CAUSE for women resorting to feminism)...there are all kinds of reasons for women to have to work...mostly it's because we got tired of putting up with the negative, and not being able to defend ourselves....I can see how feminism has pushed the boundaries to where we may be over correcting, and that isn't good- either.
@@nvrsaydie the evil one's influence can be SAVAGE working through ANYONE...women, men, children, elders, priests, lay,...satan is AS evil, no matter the conduit.
@@BH-oq7pz Preaching to the choir.
Harrison Butker was the recent lightning rod for praising traditional gender roles. He struck a nerve when he said that what women do for their families will be remembered long after what they do for their companies. May we men recognize that the same principle applies to us.
What about women who never marry and own a company and considers her company (employees) are her family?
Sorry for the bad grammar xD
@@m.dieveroThey're fools
@@lmaoyourekiddingme Ah… the misogyny is showing finally xD
Yes
"Weep not for Me but for yourselves as a time will come when barron wombs will be celebrated."
Originally Jesus was warning about the seige of Jerusalem in 70 AD where people turned to cannibalism to survive without food. Those without children were considered more blessed.
God bless Fr. Ripperger
ok Timothy quit boasting about yourself. Fr Ripperger is in a class of his own
@@salusindomino Father is a brain with legs. Just hiding it under the clothes.
@@lmaoyourekiddingme Rude
@@rccyberwarrior2267 No way. Just a big brain with legs. The rest is body suit.
Yeah Timothy has this tendency with some of his guests, but he's doing good work. Pray for his humility!
He was just saying thar he is of similar personality type, but yeah, he seemed a bit arrogant somehow
***** PLEASE OFFER MASSES FOR ALL OUR BLESSED MOTHER'S INTENTIONS!!!!! *****
Amen !!!
This submission thing is confusing and I wish you would offer more practical advice. For example I married a man that I love very much and I thought/think he would be a great leader. So I’ve learned more about the faith and what it means to be a mom and wife. I work and I want to stay home and take care of my young children but my husband thinks right now I should continue working because the economy is unstable at the moment. sometimes I try to convince him that we should still try to have me stay home even though it’s a tight budget then I realize I am kind of trying to manipulate the situation. So even in these types of cases I should still just submit and listen to my husband? Because you guys talk a lot about women not wanting to submit but there’s a ton of examples where it’s confusing because people talk about what a woman’s role is but a lot of men don’t believe in those gender roles and a lot of us women are already married to men that believe that so more practical advice would be appreciated because I want to do the right and virtuous thing.
If he thinks there isn’t enough money financially and you must work then, you must submit to his judgment and work. Once you guys have made some money you can ask to him again. Until then you must submit to your husbands judgment.
It's because he's money hungry and even when the economy gets better with Trump (?), he will still convince you to work so you can "save money" for the future.
Men are these days, despicable creatures!
I disagree with this. You can't do something you believe is immoral just because your husband says to. First rule of discernment, right, is that if something interferes with fulfilling one's vocation, you should consider dropping it. If working is interfering with your vocation as a wife and mother, then it's generally better to not work. Submitting to something you know is wrong is still sinful.
Here's an obvious example, if my husband would prefer I not take our children to Mass, I'm still obligated to take the children to Mass and teach them the faith. Submission to sin is not rightly ordered in any way.
@@victoriaeinbinder9487 the problem with your statement is that you are presupposing it’s immoral. Who makes the judgment if it’s immoral or not ? If the husband doesn’t have a good job to financially take care of the family and asks his helpmate to help, it’s not immoral. Yes he should do so in a way that she isn’t deprived of her motherly duties but as long as he makes the judgment that doesn’t affect that primary care, she is obligated to submit to him.
Thank you father Ripperger for helping make the woman I am today a more intelligent woman with communication. To really be a woman is to be free. Love to you every day. Thanks be to God.
Some men are not men
We also need strong men
* Good times make “strong” women
* “strong” women emasculate and weaken men
* weak men make hard times
* hard times make humble women
* humble women make strong men
* strong men make good times
Lots of strong men still out there. Problem is they're more often than not labeled as controlling, toxic masculinists, misogynistic, etc. Would you submit to a proper man? That's the question modern women need to honestly ask themselves.
Would you submit to a strong man?
At every level of society men are emasculated from: 1. Family therapy 2. Education 3. Emasculated by wives and mothers 4. Environmental factors in the water 5. Media and entertainment 6. Legal system and then you have conservative women with their head in the dirt complaining in an asinine manner about men being weak
Blessings to both of you! My experience from ministry as a Deacon in marriage preparation, parish life, and campus ministry agrees with everything you say about the pervasive evil of feminism. I believes that this makes "three of us". Lord Jesus, please defend and protect us and Your holy Church.
My Dad is a Deacon of 11 yrs...he recently stepped out of a 25 yr marriage while in retirement with my mom...with his cousin....she tempted and manipulated him like a true serpent...I am so ashamed....please pray for me and I you..
@@lunarvania8073 Dear lunarvania8073, how painful it must be to be the victim of a broken marriage. So sad that your Deacon father gave way to temptation. Please pray for all clergy, especially Deacons who are the least corrupt branch of Holy Orders. Praying for you and your family! Lord Jesus, deliver us from evil!
@@shaunblack3246 Aww thank you so much! This has not only been a nightmare for my Mother and my brother, sister and I...but he also has 3 grandchildren he sacrificed. The worst part is he hasnt even tried to apologize....when I asked if he even felt remorse or want forgiveness hes reply was "god forgives people dont" thank you so much for your kind words! Evil has no bounds...God Bless You!
Look to our Blessed Mother, pray the Rosary, Confession, Holy Communion, the Mass..you have all the treasures Christ left us in His Holy Church.
I dont know but i am a little old fashioned. Meaning keeping the household and giving a good example to my child. Not that a woman working is wrong but a mans work is different from a womans.
@@lwest46are you trying to do an argument of the beard??
My like was not counted 👍👍👍
Now it is.
RFR needs Fr. R.
BOOM!!
Christ made it happen!
Thanx B 2 God!
In 98 I had a coworker that divorced his wife for wanting to be a sahm.
I’d love to have been a sahm but never found anyone who agreed. Too many twisted people out there.
Whats a sahm??
Stay at home Mom @@johnanon658
@@johnanon658single at home mother
@@johnanon658stay at home mom
Our world has become so sad. No wonder the population is collapsing.
"Feminism..." Men and women NEED each other. We're a team. The first woman Episcopal priest in Alabama, a friend of me and my wife, said she dropped out of the feminist movement because "they don't understand the difference between feminism and lesbianism."
True feminism is seeing and advocating for men and women to be seen as equal in value by society. People who have a problem with that have issues in general.
God bless you our Lady keep you
10:32 Seems the book will be a success based on what's said, known for few.
The reason why I don't subscribe to the whole relying on the man financially is because I have seen too many women ending up fending for themselves because their husband ends up abandoning them or they become bums. If anything I'd prefer not the 1950s trad life. I want the old farmer trad life because even though the wife was at home tending the farm and rearing the children at least she was still making an income. You can't really cheat too if you're all in the farm working lol
@@maripuff yes that makes sense. I see cases like this. In Canada the woman in entitled to half, but in other countries like Nigeria or the Congo the woman gets nothing. In muslim countries women are not allowed to work and exist at the whim of their often abusive ´husbands’
@@maripuff yes that makes sense. I see cases like this. In Canada the woman in entitled to half, but in other countries like Nigeria or the Congo the woman gets nothing. In muslim countries women are not allowed to work and exist at the whim of their often abusive ´husbands’
It is OK to be a SAHM, IMO, so long as you have some education or skills that would enable you to work if your husband could not. Even a good and loving husband could get laid off from his job, or become ill or disabled, or die suddenly and force the wife to become the breadwinner through no fault of his own. A SAHM could also perform work at home, sell crafts, etc. on Etsy, or take a part time job during hours when her husband is home or the children are in school. Being a "trad wife" doesn't totally exclude ways for the wife to bring in extra income when needed.
woman working - making 2 chqs per family has made everything go up and up in prices now.........both husband and wife/mother has to work leaving kids not raising there own going to nursery schools to raise. seems backwards, have a baby....send them off to someone else to watch their first steps, growing up etc. working to pay them to look after your kids. so sad. i had to move out of town to a cheaper house so i could afford to stay home with my kids....i just couldnt do it. now i dont know if thats possible to raise kids as stay at home (of course there is 1 year after birth thats it). Thank you feminists ....(: so sad for those who want to raise there own kids.
Believe it or not, back in the early 2000's Elizabeth Warren -- yes, THE Elizabeth Warren the now Dem Senator from Massachusetts -- wrote a book (with her daughter) titled "The Two-Income Trap" in which she argued AGAINST married couples building their lifestyle around both spouses working. When only one spouse is the breadwinner, she wrote, the other spouse is there as a backup in case the breadwinner loses their job, becomes sick/injured, etc., and their income does not suffer as much of a hit as when they are living on two salaries and lose one. I have not read the book but have heard about it and it has often been cited in the past in defense of SAHMs.
Op, it is not so much the two incomes driving up prices, it is the doubling of the work force driving wages down
Godbless amen st.father.pio amen godbless
Would love to speak with Father Ripperger ...am in S Africa .
If in ~95% of traditional conservative marriages the wives have reduced their husbands to mere domesticated, beasts of burden then imagine just marriages in general…
This is why churches have become so useless because you need to appeal to women’s pride and insecurities to stay relevant. None of those wives in the 80-95% femturd marriages will reach paradise because humility is the ticket for entrance into heaven.
Even in some of the most traditional, conservative, pious, religious Christian homes (the last hold outs in this Age of Eve AoE), the husband doesn’t actually have any true headship or authority because when push comes to shove the wife generally has exclusive legal (corrupt gynocentric/ Eve-centric courts) and social (court of public opinion, within the context of relationships the women’s account is more readily believed and she’s regarded as more infallible - her point of view) power, authority and leverage over him.
Being labeled as the "head" or "leader" doesn't necessarily mean having actual, substantive authority, especially if that authority can be revoked at any time or if others have more legal or social power over you. Genuine authority implies the ability to make binding decisions, exercise control, and maintain influence over others without constant threat of losing that power.
If a husband’s leadership or headship is contingent on the approval of the wife and can be overridden or revoked easily, then that authority is not genuine in the strictest sense. It's more symbolic or conditional, dependent on the consent or deference of the wife being "led." The husband is merely the “nominal head of his wife”. Authentic leadership or authority typically requires not only a title or role but also the legal, social, or institutional backing that secures one's ability to act independently and enforce decisions. If that backing is weak or revocable at will, the authority is essentially limited or superficial.
This aligns with the idea that true authority is stable and not easily subject to removal unless under extraordinary circumstances. Otherwise, the husband’s “headship” or leadership is nominal, lacking real decision-making power or control.
On the contrary the wife wields significantly greater power and dominance over the husband through fear/ legal intimidation so that he doesn’t step out of line. Since the wife has the unilateral authority to exact legal penalties, it does imply a form of hierarchical dominance. This is because the ability to impose consequences without requiring consent or approval from the other party - the husband (via no fault divorce) indicates an unequal distribution of power and authority. In such a scenario, the party with the power to exact penalties (the wife) holds a dominant position over the husband, who is subject to those penalties without having reciprocal control.
The court system seems to operate on the notion “whatever primarily benefits Eve’s self-interests despite however corrupt”
It’s ironic we get persistently force fed the idea that women are somehow more innately empathetic.
Men have abused their “power“ and therefore it has been taken away. It seems like maybe you’ve been very hurt by a woman in the past and I’m sorry for that. I understand where you’re coming from.
Id love to see you say this to god @@rachelelizabeth5416
@@rachelelizabeth5416 Perhaps you need to re-read what he wrote, because there is a lot of logical and legal fact in what he said, especially in light of church promotion of "headship" in some quarters, which really is a vain attempt at making religious morals and ideas about marriage relevant in a society where marriage is a product of the State.
Whether men abused power in the past is irrelevant to what society faces today, just as the dating and marriage standards of the 1950's are irrelevant to life today. One has to deal with today's issues from today's perspective, and today's issues -- after 50 years of feminist influence in laws and social structures -- are much different from those that dominated most of the last century. For example, today 60% of men between 18-30 are single and aren't even dating. Also statistically, 60% of the women in the same age range are all dating the same 20% of men. The average marriage lasts 8.3 years and only 25% of the remaining marriages are happy ones. Less couples are having children. These are real issues that have nothing to do with what happened 50 years ago, and society will experience the results of the present day issues whether people like it or not.
When the OP mentioned that "headship" and "authority" is not substantial or real because it can be so easily revoked by his wife filing papers and the ensuing court divorce orders (and TRO's, many of which are trumped up to gain the wife a better legal position in the divorce), he's actually correct: it's not real 'headship' or 'authority' at all, but a sham version -- a facade. Most men have figured this out. They know that if they marry there is statistically more than a 50% chance their wife will file papers within 8-9 years, and churches have no clue how to remedy this even for the dwindling numbers of men in their congregations. Even Christian men have figured this out. They're told all this BS about headship -- but they know the reality, that the State ultimately determines whether you actually have 'authority' in marriage or not. The reality is that you don't.
You are correct that men's "power" has been taken away -- it's been removed from the family. And in greater society, women have much more freedom, and that is a good thing. But men still have power -- over their own lives, and over their own choices. And they are using that to survive.
@@rachelelizabeth5416"Governments have abused their power in the past therefore we should have no government at all"
Quite often I hear the “state” has destroyed marriage. Do lawyers and judges “force” women to emotionally, psychologically and financially eviscerate the lives of their ex-husbands? Or is it female empathy which does that? Women do that by their own free will. Case in point, if I could get away with theft, I’d still be a thief - a felon criminal. Just because the state empowers me to commit theft doesn’t make me any less of a thief in the event that that I do commit theft. Likewise with women filing for divorce in countries like China, USA, Russia, UK, Australia 70-83%+ of divorces are filed by them.
As much of an abomination that gay marriage and transgenderism are the breakdown of society is due to invalid divorces, and the majority of invalid divorces also happen to be initiated by society’s “protected” special sacred cows albeit straight women.
Fr Ripperger, please do a speech on “nice guys’” vs “kind” men. There is a huge difference. Kind men will sacrifice for their wives and children. The nice guy has a boat or golf or hunt club membership. Discern the difference gals or live an isolated, oppressed life.
I was a sahm until my husband left. My youngest was 3 months old. After that I worked as a single mom. Men need to be the spiritual head of their households that they are called to be and quit leaving it to the women to do.
I married a man who I thought was a leader, strong and head of our family (military for a decade). As soon as he found out what I was capable of, he quit working, and i supported us, the house, his children, cooked, cleaned, did all the laundry, etc. I begged him to get a job bc we were drowning. He refused.
We had a miracle baby, and a year later, he completely abandoned us.
If I didn't step up, we'd have lost everything.
Now, he's living with a woman half his age, the age of his eldest, and HER child (who is our child's age).
I grew up, and still have, traditional values. I have a degree in psychology/sociology and special education. I do NOT agree with this feminist movement. We have different strengths naturally.
It's been the most difficult last 2 years.
I think the world has made our men so effeminate and I don't know how to pray that out. I've been praying for 1.5 years for his conversion and return to my daughter and I ... this really hit home. I just don't know what else to do about it.
I married a marine who resents providing and is unfaithful. Beware military men, ladies, and don't be fooled by the image of strength and the uniform.
@catherineobrien-mchue1388 exactly right. I pray daily but wow. The infidelity, the mental anguish, the refusal to get help and worst of all, the pain they inflict on our children.
I will pray for you, if that's ok?
I hear many trad wives are left alone. It's dangerous when your life is dictated by people who have no stakes in it. I like the trad movement, but all these trad channels are run by men, hours and hours behind a microphone and camera, editing, etc... In the mean time, who is doing the endless life chores? Is not as if youtube pays millions for them to provide
I am so sorry that you have went through this betrayal, Stay close to Jesus and carry your cross. I will pray for you.
@tscipio69 thank you. 🙏
St Paul is often cut short.
He actually said that wives should submit to their husband. Husbands should love their wives as Jesus loved His church and died for her
If I ever find that man who will love me enough to die for love of me, you can be sure that I will submit. Until then, I submit to Jesus only.
You'll be looking a long time then. Because what Paul told wives to do is not conditioned upon what he told husbands to do. What you suggest is the ideal, but the commands / instructions given to both spouses by St. Paul do not hinge on what the other spouse does or doesn't do.
@@chriscampbell9191isn't that the nub of the problem? Stating the ideal is all fine and dandy, but you need a rubric for imperfect people.
@@ssllylawrence618 True, people weren't stamped out of some factory somewhere. We all have our faults. That said, there is a difference between establishing a rubric for imperfect people, and trying to apply the ideal that way, and denying that the 'ideal' was ever written in Scripture, or completely rewriting it to fit modern day society. Once one ideal is rewritten, they all can be. And I think that -- for better or for worse -- we see a lot of that happening today in churches.
Lol, the concept of duty is still beyond OPs comprehension
@@lwest46 Nowhere in scripture does any Apostle condone domestic (or other) violence, from anyone. Nowhere. Especially when dealing with Christians, regardless of the setting. The Scriptures were intended for Christians, and Christians aren't supposed to settle their differences with violence. Period. That should be a given when dealing with these verses. Violence and ill treatment of others goes against everything Christ and the Apostles taught Christians to be. The verses about the roles of husband and wife hinge on those other edicts -- to be humble, patient, love others, etc.
Rebellion is the devils perrorgative,
Typical is the Jezebel Spirit, the problem with the Church of Thyatira, (that behind the Protestant reformation rather rebellion) Even as the prophecy says " Those who have not known the depths of satan " I will give him the Morning Star-- The Antidote of the Jezebel Spirit,, It does suggest that the Jezebel teaching have to do with the depths of satan,
Just bought your book
Waiting for this interview for a while ❤
Where is rest of the interview??
@@johnanon658 Go to the original podcast on the same channel.
Women are wanting a perfect man to support everything and are all looking for a St Joseph. Yet they are not Mary. The current society, we can do our best but unfortunately it’s not enough for the women these days. That’s even for us men going to FSSP mass.
I think Hildebrand’s philosophy really touches on the idea of “ natural inclinations” the problem is a lack of ability to respond to proper value and or have a response at all in a feminine or masculine way .. values in this case being masculinity or femininity ..
Yeah it’s the culture .. but there are other reasons too..screens and television are one …
I wonder if Eve would of separated from Adam if he was more patriarchal? Asking for a friend.
PS
Thinking no, because she had no government or other man to protect her.
Don't blame women for the communist/luciferian scheme to separate men and women and parents and children. The communists, in their stated 48 goals of communism, wanted to bring women outside the home so they could more readily indoctrinate and attack the vulnerable children. Defeating Christianity is much simpler if mothers and fathers are not present to teach and model the faith to their children.
So Adam should’ve have denied Eve her autonomy and oppressed her into discarding the forbidden fruit? 🍎 help me understand your point.
Ok grasshopper, I shall try to help you understand, since you didn't get the pebble from my hand. Eve always has her autonomy. She chose wrong. Adam chose to do wrong with her. He should not have. He should of grabbed the bad fruit from her hand and burned it. That way she could have the autonomy of not having death entering into the world.
All I know is that since the rise of modern-day Feminism and its political, social and cultural impact, I seem to have lost my country.
O MARIA… - “I have noticed that the devil seeks first of all, with any excuse, to deprive his victim of the MIRACULOUS MEDAL of the IMMACULATA. Once he has donet that, the rest will come very easy to him.” †St. Maximilian M. Kolbe (her littlest knight), ora pro nobis
I need to read both these books!
Trickle down economics has caused the destruction of the family..
The Catholic Maronite liturgy has the same reverence as the LM. Check it out if you have the chance.
Broad generalization- Maronite liturgies generally got hit by Vatican II pretty hard as well, more than most eastern liturgies
All forms of the mass can be reverent. But unfortunately most priests don’t understand or aren’t willing to take a stance as to why reverence is necessary. I’m thankful to have a priest at our parish who understands this.
@@RussCornwall-un3spReverence is always key , but Unfortunately the Novus Ordo is inherently flawed by the methodology for its creation … that of overlapping Protestantism like worship practices with an intermixing of elements of the True Mass of the Ages . Confusion is sown , and these begets confusion to this very day .
Depends on if they up hold pre Vatican II form, believes, and disciplines.
@@AlanThomas-hp3fn Hold to the mercy of God with help of our Lady.
Women are waiting to submit...they want to submit, but there must be a leader and if the husband cant or wont lead, then women must step forward...
I am catholic...before i divorced my husband we went to a priest for counseling...he said i needed to let my husband lead...i did...he overdrew the band account...the electricity was turned off ( he neglected the bills)
One car was reposessed...i had to lead to survive...we divorced...got an annulment and 10 years later i married a man ( Catholic) and he was a leader...We were married nearly 40 years until he died...he was the light of my life...we were both consecrated to Our Lady...that matters too
you chose him with the curse. take accountability. stop blaming men. stop chasing assholes and chad's.
@@wolfkingsigma2795don't make your judgement off of so little informations, bitterness at first action is not useful
@@planteruines5619 No bitterness at all. Societal observations. Masculinity. Men First. Peace quiet and freedom.
@@wolfkingsigma2795 "societal observations"-->your own experience of life who is not even a millionth good enough to describe what happens in the world
@@planteruines5619 Insults behind a keyboard? OK SIMP GOOFBALL CUCK. Be your own fool with eyes blinded over. May you find your needle in the haystack in modern female culture. Good luck.
The case for Patriarchy needs to account for the modern misapprehension regarding what Patriarchy is and how to implement a Patriarchy at home and in the business world sensitive to modern psychological and emotional needs. Its a very worthy project.
A development of Patriarchy theology of St Thomas Aquinas is also a worthy enterprise.
You sound like someone who overcomplicates things.
@@RubenWalsh-iv5ik The modern western world is psychologically deformed through feminism and a deformed sexuality through contraception. The Patriarchy intellectual movement needs to be sensitive to the legitimate needs of men and woman subject to the modern deformed culture, initially changed and reformed by a legitimate Patriarchal society.
@@RubenWalsh-iv5ikagree
Without legal backing, you’re playing with Monopoly money pretending it’s legal tender
Little late on feminism. 1960's was great push in my generation.
Yeah, Tim should talk less and let his guests talk more.
I hate to say it but the most evil women I've met are actually misogynistic. For example, my ex mother in law (I mistakenly or misguidedly married a muslim who forcably sodomized me and as a result I had to divorce) would literally bring my ex husband money to go to prostitutes everytime she visited us. My mother also- hated other women but claimed to be submissive. Before Susan B Anthony's early feminism, 1 out of 20 (or more) women in NYC were prostitutes. Please please for one address the iceberg of the sin of misogyny. It's big, it's often hidden and to be honest, feminists at least stand up to some of the misogyny.
Yeah, Catholics aren't misogynistic. Feminists don't stand up to misogyny; they muddy the water and call patriarchy misogyny. Catholics developed chivalry. Of course people living outside the grace of God will live lives that are disordered.
It's shocking that your mother in law would do such a thing. Narcissistic men are often very close to their toxic mothers. Sounds similar. Yes, many women dislike other women. There are hidden resentments, jealous feelings, even sabotage in female friendships. I rather stay on my own for that reason. I'm kind, offer help and concern for female friends, but its seldom returned.
Implying that mysogoney even registers at all as a problem in general, lol
I feel sorry for what you got through. Do not expect from this kind of religious ppl to address misogyny, they have a very specific agenda. Pray to God to give you discernment to find your own spiritual kin. Do lve your life with responsibility -its life who teaches us in person, not any idle youtube preachers. Let these ppl (men and many women) fight their own demons (feminism, modernism, communism or whatever). Live your life in full, God bless you
@@vickyk1861 divorcee
Im never gonna stop
Stop what?
Pope John Paul 2 suggested mothers should be paid a wage
In my opinion, the indispensible treatment the Patriarchy received in the Old Testament and the rigidity of the laws that maintained it gave way in some respects as other disciplines did with the fulfillment of the law accomplished by Jesus. God taking on human nature as a man born of a perfect woman, one that He created with such perfection and graced with such gifts that He could submit Himself to her, turned, one could say, things upside down(The Magnificat). This was not done to negate Divine Order but to signal a change, a change needed , the change of the heart that Jesus so emphasized. The Pharisees were the epitome of Patriarchy but managed to continually stir the ire of Jesus. They could obey all laws to the t and still not be saved. The vestiges of sin that remain with us until Jesus comes again cause the loss of souls and we should discipline ourselves with humility to prevent it, but in Christ, women as well as men are justified. Jesus is the new Adam and Mary is the new Eve. A husband and wife, most importantly, should be equally yoked and work for the salvation of each other and that of their children. Otherwise, there will be bitterness that will transfer to the children and cause the social and psychological problems spoken of. Finger pointing never works( the plank in the eye). Again, my comments are my opinions.
Well what is your opinion exactly in that meandering post? That you should be free of dury to submit to a man b/c muh pharisees? ??
Good Chat but this should of been put up 60 yrs ago.... I'ts too late even the "trad" women are feminist unknowing yet attend church regularly
No they aren’t. Women who are home having kids are not caring about career or social media.
@@Foxie770 They're in the minority.
The scourge is so widespread nobody even knows it exists.
@@Foxie770unfortunately, they are trying to live a trad lifestyle byt have no idea how to submit to their husbands authority
@@vw5056yes, there are some many feminist assumptions operating in the software, they are some common and accepted now. Like how a fish does not know what water js
If someone needs a guide to personal prayer Poustinia by Catherine Doherty . Eastern Spirituality for Dummies
Hang on why should the women be blamed for man we only have man's word for that God didn't blame eve he blamed them both
Adam was essentially a cuck. Had he reprimanded Eve for her sin he'd have likely found favor with God. How many times have we heard modern men say things such as "happy wife, happy life?" Same thing. This type of beta behavior is not Godly. That's why i blame both rebellious (feminist) women and weak men who won't put their foot down.
Who was blaming only women??
Adam actually is held to be more responsible because he is the head of his family
Why didn't he mention the Teology of the Body?
not trad pill enough
TG begins the show by stating that he and Fr Ripperger are very much alike. I thought, "Really, is Fr. Ripperger a narcissist, too?" I guess so, because the two of them spend the whole video talking about themselves. I had only decided to listen to this because I thought some issues would be covered. The last time I listened to R4R was about Vatican II where TG blamed the failures of Vatican II on feminism! But there were no women at Vatican II! It was all priests.
Finally, during the last half minute of this video Fr Ripperger said something substantiative, that the Curse of Adam was that men are unwilling to be responsible and unwilling to suffer. That's sort of the way I see Adam in the Garden, but I would describe him as selfish and manipulative. For most of history, people have been blaming Eve solely for the fall. But Adam was fully involved. Popular art and movies, for example, often depict Adam as being somewhere else when Eve partook. The popular movie of the '60s, "The Bible," for example shows Adam in another area of the Garden, and Eve brings him the apple of which she has already partook. But the Bible says clearly that Adam was right at Eve's side when she partook. (And we're not talking about an apple here, that's just a metaphor for sex and occultism that the Devil used.) So why didn't Adam speak up and do something? Fr. Ripperger and TG would say it was because he was weak, didn't take authority, yada, yada. I think Adam didn't speak up because he wanted to see if Eve would die first before he partook. After all, God had promised that "on the day. . ." they partook, Adam and Eve would surely die. Adam wanted to use Eve as a guinea pig. He was just as greedy and power hungry as Eve, but didn't want to endanger himself. And when he saw she survived, he then partook himself. But Adam didn't know how God was defining a day. In God's timeline, a day is as a thousand years. And Adam did indeed die at almost a thousand years of age. What makes me believe Adam was this underhanded, a toothless rat, as it were? His own words tell me that. When God found them out and confronted them, Adam retorted the he never would have sinned had it not been "for that woman you gave me." So Adam blamed Eve, and, by extension, God, because God created Eve.
So at least Eve confessed. Hers is called the first confession. She said that the Devil had tempted her, "but I did eat." But I don't think that either Adam or Eve ever repented. At least it's not mentioned that they did so. So God should have gotten two confessions and two repentences. But he only got one confession.
You obviously never heard Fr Ripperger's talk on the fall of Adam and Eve. He never says that Adam never sinned. In fact, he says just the opposite in that talk.
@@annatmarshall5133 I look forward to hearing it then. Both Adam and Eve typified the negative traits of both sexes.
Tim loves himself so much its hilarious. He constantly pouts at the camera and adjusts his hair more than any woman ive ever seen!!! His wife cannot say 1 single sentence without giggling like a child. I watch this for pute comedic value 😂😂😂
Love it or hate it, a view is a view. Thanks you for coming. Thank you for leaving.
TL;DR
I suppose I am a 'feminist' as in a female who is single independent owns a home, car...so I have the responsibility of taking care of myself. Retired RN, so took care of others for years including an elderly mother. I have learned to use tools, changed spark plugs, a little plumbing - it's called survival with God as my savior. When I listen to 2 men try to define women....well it's definitely from an inexperienced point of view. Good look fellow men on trying to figure out women. Sometimes I think God made us for your entertainment, be it laughter or putting you down on your knees praying to God for relief.
retarded post. I have a wife of over 20 years that agrees with me as well as six daughters. Perhaps, YOU don't understand women that well.
@@RulesForRetrogrades
I admire Father Ripperger's work, his words are bringing light and true guidance to many.
I am however very surprised and saddened by this disrespectful answer to a lady viewer.
Even if this woman tries to contradict your talkshow, is it really necessary to answer in such an aggressive way ?
I doubt Father Ripperger would approve of it.
So…rather than marring a man at your station, you wasted your youth getting ran thru by one randy Doctor after another, thinking you could lock them down with your sassy gumption??
@@RulesForRetrogradesPerhaps you boxing in women into a box of your liking is calming for you to collect your mind. I don't disagree with women who live by what they stand for I think it is disrespectful to try to place all into your idea of how they should live and relate to men. If you actually knew the Aramaic translation of the Bible you may understand differently.
@@johnanon658That's a hideous remark. There's no locking down of anyone - freedom.
What did you say exactly at 7:00?
Nietzschian resentément
Such a necessary subject. So many are so ignorant at least in this country. Thank you Father & Tim. May God reward you.
Where are tbe strong men? The family leaders? The men who pray and take care of their families? Women don't want to Be men, some have to take on that role bevsuse the men don't want to.
Unfortunately these days, many young men are taught that these positive male attributes are "toxic". It's a lose-lose-lose situation. We need to teach boys and men that being strong and protective and masculine are good things!
@@nicolamustard7232 I consider that an excuse. The young males are allowed to indulge themselves with video games and porn (both of which are pushed by communists/luciferians). Children who are given cell phones and computers with internet access are being exposed to porn (including violent porn) starting at the age of 8 -- parents need to understand this evil. No women that I know are teaching young men that being mature, responsible, protective and working for the family is "toxic".
What percentage of fatherlessness is due to women leveraging corrupt courts to physically remove the presence of their children’s fathers from the lives of their children?
Father ripperger and Timothy just said 80-95% of trad con women have emasculated their husbands. What do you mean where are all the strong men?
What’s women’s level of moral agency compared to men’s? That’s the right question to ask.
I’m in my soft guy era” = the realization that what’s the point of manning up and carrying the extra burden and weight of responsibility if you can just basically be a “woman” in some sense and be entitled to the same equal benefits and advantages of manning up without actually having to man up.
@rccyberwarrior2267 you are extremely out of touch
So true
"Is at hand today"
Hahahahah
Wat
I think with regards to the men’s right to the marital act the men need to go first. They need to be responsible and willing to suffer. My husband was watching porn and I always felt I HAD to, you know, because of the Bible. But I was reading this book on angels and when I finished it I felt like I received a message that I didn’t have to. And so it’s been years and years and I just don’t want to. He also was abusive verbally and I prayed and prayed and prayed but I never felt license from God to leave him. Even I thought he was trying to poison me and in prayer about it I think Jesus said, “Let him.” (I’ve been careful with him around my food, I keep an eye on it all the time out of habit, but I also think God is keeping me alive). And once at mass he thinks God told him, “I will remake you.” So I keep waiting and he’s been fairly reliable about not verbally abusing me. But I don’t believe him when he says he doesn’t use porn. That’s what I’m waiting for, I think, plus for him to integrate with the family. The kids really love him and wouldn’t understand if I left.
“I felt like I received a message…”. A message that what? That You could break the natural law, and your marriage vows, forcing your husband into Celibacy, which is not a gift given to him by God in his vocation as a married man.
No lady, God does not allow you to just abrogate your duty b/c you had a feeling from an angel book, lol.
Are you sure this is not a power play in the relationship, that you have not succumb to temptation of a spirit of usurper?
Twice in OP you say that you heard the voice of God. understand that people receiving messages from God is EXTREMELY rare. It happens to a few in some rare circumstances but we are to be skeptical of any alleged inner or outer and we are not to judge these thing all on our own outside of spiritual direction…
Also, your discussion of him poisoning you makes me suspect you may have some mental health issues… jus saying you should probably not take these vpices so seriously…
…and we should NEVER heed any such voices that tell us to to do wrong. Deciding to, categorically, and for YEARS, refuse to do the marital duty is a sin, an infidelity to your marriage vows and a GRAVE uncharity. you need to confess this, you need to divulge exactly how long this has been going on of you unilaterally deciding to end all intimacy.
And you need not only apologize to God but to your husband and do penance…
…and regarding his (hopefully former) porn use, yes this is a serious problem and it can have a negative impact in the bedroom, and even beyond just the distress it causes you and it absolutely needs to stop. That is for him to work out with the grace of the sacrament of confession.
Even if he still may…do it himself sometimes, he needs to leave the porn out of it as the first and most critical step in a journey towards self mastery.
But you also need to consider how you are imperiling both his and your souls with this abandonment and ursupation. I really cant believe I am having to explain this to a Christian woman that you can not just arbitrarily decide to make him wait and wait and suffer endlessly. You are basically driving him to sin, are being incredibly derilict and uncharitable. You will have to answer to the Almighty for all of this…
…You need to divulge all of this in detail in the confessional ASAP. You cant just to say: “id like to confess being arbitrarily unavailable to my husband on more than one occasion.” That would be deceptive and a sacrilege. You need to explain EXACTLY what you have done to your marriage and for how long this has been going on!
I will be praying for your family tonight. God Bless you all, and may God have mercy on your husband, and especially on you…
Sincerely.
You lost me at 6:11. You wasted *MY* time because you failed to get to the point of the discussion.
AND because you were too busy patting yourself on the back.
AND flattering your guest was more important to you than serving the needs of your customers.
Don't waste my time kid.
Go pound sand.
Well now, isn't that an informed, intellectual response by a Christian Catholic author ?! I'm writing on Healing Diabolic Narcissisism in the Church, care to have me on?@@RulesForRetrogrades
@@RulesForRetrogrades comments, like this make you look like a real..... (fill in the blanks)
@@RulesForRetrogrades ...And you want people to listen to and respect you??...
@@RulesForRetrogrades My dude, take the L on this one. You did take a lot of time to get to the discussion and spent too much on defending originality. Not throwing shade, just an observation. Appreciate what you do.
At some point, one must wonder if certain individuals are cognizant of the fact that they are actively attempting to turn half of the population away from Christianity due to the distortion of Christian teachings they are disseminating? I fully believe these individuals need to be more careful and should realize that they WILL one day be held accountable for every soul they may have turned away from Christ in their hubris. From the perspective of some of us, such individuals are just as wrong as the Fr. James Martins of the world.
Great point. Instead of helping young men with their actual issues (gaming, p&rn addiction, loneliness, violence) they add up to the incel culture. However, these clerics are quite few thankfully. Catholic Church has done a lot to overcome her past demons and be more inclusive. The problem is much more flagrant within the Orthodox (s)-
This perspective sounds a lot like deflecting blame. It seems like immoral or bad men are trying to point a finger and blame it on women when ultimately it comes down to individual responsibility. It’s kind of sad because honestly, both genders are responsible for a lot of bad. Men lost their power because they abused it and women are now losing their femininity because they’re abusing their gain of power. And the family suffers. And on and on it goes. My husband, who is the head of the household, does an amazing job of being the head of the household without making me feel like a subject. He deserves my submission because he is a good man who is leading me to holiness and I gladly give it to him however, he does respect me, my body and my mind. It’s definitely a two-way street. The way this RUclipsr talks seems dangerously close to the “women are cattle” notion. I don’t think I’m going to listen to anymore of his videos. It’s disappointing that Father Ripperger was on here.
@@rachelelizabeth5416 if you actually read the original feminists you'd understand that gaining power and losing femininity was what feminism was all about. Losing femininity, as femininity used to be defined, was intrinsic to freeing women from the prisons of motherhood and marriage. Women had to be freed from motherhood and marriage to be fully independent persons, and achieve their full potential as individuals. And we're seeing the results of that today. Is it a problem? Only if you still hold morals and values from the 1950's or earlier.
If you're referring to women, most churches in the United States are 60% women and the men are leaving. So who's really being turned away exactly?
@@chriscampbell9191 You're not up to date on this. New stats just dropped this year on this topic. It's the opposite, in fact. Women are leaving churches in unprecedented numbers now. In Gen Z there are more men than women in church and women are leaving the faith, and how women are treated is one of the biggest factors cited. One definitely sees this in Orthodoxy (we call them Orthobros) and in more traditional Catholic parishes (more younger men than younger women). If you spend any time whatsoever in online religious forums you'll see a trend of young men being very toxic against women and also simultaneously wondering why there are no women around to date in church. Topics I've seen personally from random young men (repeatedly) concerned with whether women are wearing head coverings, how women dress, whether or not women should be allowed to commune whilst menstruating, whether women can kiss icons whilst menstruating, whether or not women should even go to college, how Russia getting rid of all of their domestic violence laws is based and not a problem, the surprise that there aren't many women in their churches, how their girlfriends/wives (if they have them) are not interested In Orthodoxy after they've been pushing for the lack of women's autonomy and rights, etc. On the other hand, these guys are the definition of folks who are so into aesthetics that they've completely forgotten about the person of Christ. They need Jesus in the worst way.
Weird. I put a thumbs up just now and it didn’t count.😢
You have apparently been a bad goi
You two exemplify the vice of Pride.
I agree. In the East we have a word that exemplifies what's going on here, called prelest. It's a state where one mistakenly believes that they are more holy and less sinful than they actually are.
I do not at all see the vice of Pride in these two Catholic gentlemen (one ordained, one laity). They have similar interests and are sharing the things upon which they are working. There was very little actual self-referencial commentary, and no hint of boasting. The supposed vice, i just cannot see it. C'mon, give these men a break...
@@michelledalenaa I think this sin applies to most humans.
The decline of the west is mostly attributed to the special, sacred cows of society - women. Women are the true leaders of society into perdition like Eve. Men like Adam are their followers.
@@silverback3382Adam actually had the first sin - where was he? Why was he not there protecting Eve? That was his primary role - protector- and he failed and so it goes throughout history.
Reality check:
Even in some of the most traditional, conservative, pious, religious Christian homes (the last hold outs in this Age of Eve AoE), the husband doesn’t actually have any true headship or authority because when push comes to shove the wife generally has exclusive legal (corrupt gynocentric/ Eve-centric courts) and social (court of public opinion, within the context of relationships the women’s account is more readily believed and she’s regarded as more infallible - her point of view) power, authority and leverage over him.
Being labeled as the "head" or "leader" doesn't necessarily mean having actual, substantive authority, especially if that authority can be revoked at any time or if others have more legal or social power over you. Genuine authority implies the ability to make binding decisions, exercise control, and maintain influence over others without constant threat of losing that power.
If a husband’s leadership or headship is contingent on the approval of the wife and can be overridden or revoked easily, then that authority is not genuine in the strictest sense. It's more symbolic or conditional, dependent on the consent or deference of the wife being "led." The husband is merely the “nominal head of his wife”. Authentic leadership or authority typically requires not only a title or role but also the legal, social, or institutional backing that secures one's ability to act independently and enforce decisions. If that backing is weak or revocable at will, the authority is essentially limited or superficial.
This aligns with the idea that true authority is stable and not easily subject to removal unless under extraordinary circumstances. Otherwise, the husband’s “headship” or leadership is nominal, lacking real decision-making power or control.
On the contrary the wife wields significantly greater power and dominance over the husband through fear/ legal intimidation so that he doesn’t step out of line. Since the wife has the unilateral authority to exact legal penalties, it does imply a form of hierarchical dominance. This is because the ability to impose consequences without requiring consent or approval from the other party - the husband (via no fault divorce) indicates an unequal distribution of power and authority. In such a scenario, the party with the power to exact penalties (the wife) holds a dominant position over the husband, who is subject to those penalties without having reciprocal control.
The court system seems to operate on the notion “whatever primarily benefits Eve’s self-interests despite however corrupt”
It’s ironic we get persistently force fed the idea that women are somehow more innately empathetic.
What percentage of women who initiate divorce psychologically, emotionally and financially eviscerate the lives of the husbands? Paternity fraud, child custody, alimony, child support + without having to prove how they spend it, his assets - the fruits of his labor, his toil. They say men have become soft and too weak to fight in battles. On the contrary men still fight in battles, the battlefield has shifted from the outdoors into family courts. No lawyer forces women full child custody or forces her to keep the fruits of his labor. This whole notion of female empathy runs counter to reality. Then you have abortion.
It only makes sense why 95% of households have become feminist, because men are afraid of a very real threat subconsciously at best. What percentage of this crisis of fatherlessness is caused by women leveraging the corrupt courts to physically remove the presence of fathers from the lives of their children? Even in homes men have retreated into man caves. Proverbs 21:9 states, "It is better to live in a corner of the housetop than in a house shared with a quarrelsome wife".
I could be wrong but it seems like a substantial portion young “trad con” women seeking to get married view their prospective husbands as some sort of resource acquisition that they feel entitled to have and to manage and direct, rather than to truly follow their husbands as means of getting their “misbegotten and defective” (to quote St. Thomas Aquinas) behinds into heaven
The only true authority that husbands have these days is moral authority and they’ll have this moral authority until the end of time; however, this moral authority is rarely preached in churches but it will be actualized on judgment day when wives have to pay an account as to how they “followed” their husbands like how the church - the bride - is to follow Christ.
Please do not blame women for the evils of communism/luciferianism that have been imposed by the ruling luciferian cult that Jesus identified in the Book of Revelation (2:9 and 3:9) -- imposed through secular education, entertainment, porn, abortion, unjust laws and corrupt courts.
Men really have no 'authority', except over themselves, and themselves alone. Churches' teachings on 'headship' and 'authority' in marriage and family are a weak attempt at being relevant in a society where the Laws of the State are paramount, and will always prevail in marriage and family.
@@lwest46 We had a version of 'patriarchy' (under the feminist definition) until the 1970's, and believe you me, women before then were thought of as a lot more than just 'mindless breeders'. They were respected as wives and mothers, and their opinions were respected also. Ask anyone who lived back in the early 20th Century how things were. They weren't a panacea, but they weren't all abusive marriages, either.
Feminism is what Betty Friedan and others taught. The advancement of women by freeing them from the old morals, freeing them from being tied permanently marriage and motherhood, and freeing them from familial responsibilities if they so choosed. Along with that there were calls for equal pay, equal opportunity, and completely equal rights under the law. So it wasn't just one thing, but the marriage and motherhood aspects were important because they held women back. In 1980 they were even calling for the family to be redefined, to accommodate women's desires to be all they can be in business and other pursuits -- if they so choosed.
Judges get involved in the majority of marriages, because the divorce rate is well over 50%, most marriages only last 8.3 years, and even Catholic commentators recognise those statistics -- so divorce is pertinent to the conversation, especially when 70% of them are filed by the wife.
And you seem to be equating Biblical 'headship' -- of the husband -- in the family with abuse and bullying, two things which Paul was completely against (Ephesians 5:25, and also Ephesians 6:4)). And where did St. Paul say women can't do tasks like drive or hold a job? That said, St. Paul wrote what he wrote for a reason. There had to have been a reason he wrote, at least three or four times, that wives are to submit to their husbands. We didn't write it -- he did. We may not agree with it today, and we may not like it, but it's still Scripture, and Paul (and Peter) wrote it.
Of course, none of this matters, because the Laws of the State will always prevail, as well as the customs and morals of today's society. We get the society we live in.
@@lwest46 I never said they were idyllic, but your average family in the 50's, 40's, and before then wasn't the way you describe things, either. The fact is, no polling survey institute ever polled all families back in the early 20th Century because polling didn't really exist until the late 1950's and early 1960's. Betty Friedan wrote a book full of anecdotes that were portrayed to represent all suburban and married women. More than half the book is full of them. Yet the women in the anecdotes were all under therapy of some sort. They were not the typical suburban, married housewife in America at that time. The book was based on an extrapolation of the statistically few women Friedan encountered. Yet her conclusions were accepted as gospel truth by millions, and she was the mother of a movement which results we all live with today -- modern feminism has shaped modern society in ways that we still are seeing play out.
Whenever I tune into Catholic radio, the subjects they complain about the most -- broken homes, divorce, absent fathers, abortion, etc. -- all can be traced in some way to feminism. I'm not exaggerating here, it's just fact. I've read the literature, I was raised by a feminist, I know clearly what the movement stood for and stands for -- good or bad. I think churches in general are lost when it comes to dealing with these things. Bringing back 'patriarchy' not only wouldn't work, it simply will never, ever happen. But churches have to be able to identify the source of a problem if they truly want to deal with it, and attempt to solve it. I don't' see that happening.
Agreed on extremism. It seems to be endemic in society these days.
[Edited for a left out word, and a typo]
Suppose a wife wants to divorce and her husband wants to see his children regularly while his wife leverages the courts to eviscerate his life (financially and psychologically). Are you suggesting that most women who keep sole child custody are basically subhuman completely bereft of empathy?
You mentioned Kamala...Am I to assume you support Trump? why mix politics with the logic? Makes me think there is an agenda.
This guy probably has nuanced views on trump, (and many of those backing him). Regardless, this guy obviously does not the idea of ANY woman beibg president
Women are made in the IMAGE OF GOD.
It doesnt say that
@@johnanon658Yes it does. And maybe stupid men should concern themselves with the state of masculinity…men are more like beasts than human these days. Leave women alone and sort your own sick selves out.
It says man is made in the inage, and it says, and thay “were made in the image of God, male and female He made them.”
Read Gen 1 & 2 again
@@johnanon658you've made a theological error , man and woman have the same nature, thus the same dignity
@@kayy4040tbh both are beasts , we both are in the bottom of the well
Unfortunately, for women to be able to trust their husbands enough to be able to submit to them, the husbands would need to be more aligned with the teachings of the faith....HOWEVER...what is MUCH overlooked is the original cause of feminism...AND THAT BEING that husbands have abused AND NEGLECTED their role in a marriage (as taught by example by ST. JOSEPH AND THE FAITH). FEMINISM is a response to the fault, NOT vice versa . And until men are responsible enough to play their roles in what it means to be a husband...(ie- role model ST. JOSEPH-he never mistreated Mary....) women can't submit to men who don't follow the teachings of Christ, and fundamentally, lead a family into chaos and decay. I do not agree with all of the feminism views, but-i can understand why it is so strong of a response to the abusive, mistreating, cheating husbands of the past...(among other issues)...sooo...until guys are held responsible for their faults in bringing about feminism...order in the family unit WILL NOT be restored.
Op, you seem to be coming up with some generalized justification to not submit to your husband, as if any of the alleged crimes of “men” in the past justify your attitude. Or, are you even married?
That is not the cause of feminism. The elites that rule our societies are the cause of feminism. They want to inflate the currency, put more of that money in their own pockets. But they can't do that if families are single income homes. They have to trick women into working. They have to trick everybody into accepting the new paradigm. They created feminism to fool you into thinking slavery is empowering. And it worked. My grandfather could support a family of seven kids on a taxi drivers wage. Now families struggle to support one kid with both parents working. Why do you think that is?
@@johnanon658 And the original sin was that of Adam. The instruction not to eat the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was given to Adam before Eve was formed. Adam failed in his duty to protect his bride Eve and he failed in his obligation to God to not eat of the forbidden fruit. So men are the first to fail in their duty as spiritual leader and protector. A true leader serves his bride -- just as Christ, the true leader, served His Church and continues to do so today.
@@johnanon658 haha...I could have been deceived into a marriage where my husband follows satan...I WILL NOT, and AM NOT obliged to obey...I will take my chances and obey Christ, instead....THE ORIGINAL BRIDE-GROOM... sooo... no. It is not an excuse, AND it's also NOT a cop out for husbands to use that to do what ever the hell they want in a marriage and control and abuse their wives and children. Learn to be like Christ!...if a husband is not obligated to follow what's right, they are the original breakers of the vow...and breach of contract.
@@rccyberwarrior2267 AMEN!...finally!!...men have for soooo long used women as scapegoats for their faults!!...always focusing on the sin of Eve to divert taking responsibility for their own actions, and they back this up by paragraphs in scripture to justify their means, instead of conveying the entire message. I used to have an issue with the whole wives obey your husbands...until I learned the whole story...women ARE supposed to obey their husbands, BECAUSE husbands are supposed to act like Christ!!!...WHO wouldn't obey someone who's got your back to the point of laying their life down for you???...OF COURSE I would trust that person WITH MY LIFE (like we are called to do in Christ...as the church, as well)...BUT, let's get real...how many husbands are in compliance with this scenerio??...(and...let's not forget, if they have let in the evil one into their life via sin ( we all sin), the husband can be influenced to bring about destruction to the wife and the whole family....so...I think there has to be some context formed here, about this general rule of obeying the husband...
I think now also we women who wear revealing clothes thus putti g some men into sin is same as Eve .
Holy cow😅
Wat
September 18, the Woman of Revelation 12 giving birth to Melech Hamoshiach, Archangel of Light., the greatest of all Divine Spirits😊
Tf you talking about?
Same! 😬
I’m fully aware of the feminist movement and how destructive it is. However… Adam failed to protect Eve from the serpent. So where does the blame actually start?
Eve.
@@RulesForRetrogrades…Okay…Yes we took the bite and convinced Adam to do the same…but…as man is to protect and lead their families….you would think that would’ve been an equal bad. When Adam should have not allowed the serpent in and protect Eve. I know it sounds like I’m being a jerk…I’m honestly not trying to. I will 100% admit the feminist movement has destroyed the family. I’m still trying to brake that mindset …because, being born in 1973, I am a product from the hippies and feminine revolution. I also don’t consider myself evil because I’m a woman. I’m truly trying to live out my roll as a woman. I failed at being a stay at home mother…instead took a career. You’re going to love this one…. My career is a police officer. With that being said both my daughters are married and stay at home mothers. I did strongly encourage that.
The Church Fathers disagree. It was Eve who sinned first. Adam's sin of negligence isn't as bad as hers.
@@RulesForRetrogrades Don't forget that God made the covenant with Adam, not Eve. The real sin occurred when Adam went along with it. Also, because of the fall and how God used the BVM, the devil has made a concerted effort to be extremely evil against all women.
@@RulesForRetrogrades Just stating “The church fathers disagree” isn’t a great answer. ‘The church fathers’ are hardly going to accept culpability are they? Being as sinful and imperfect as the rest of us. What might the church mothers say? 🤣
... and this is why St Paul advised it is better not to marry. I wish I'd listened to him 😂 25 years with an abusive closeted gay man was enough and the Lord guided me safely out of it. You guys are so prescriptive, like the pharisees.
Some men are absolute scumbags. That's why you need to choose carefully.
Father,please receive conditional traditional Rite Ordination from a Resistance-SSPX or Thuc line Bishop.
Bishop Williamson,Father Moylan,and this Priest,are the only clerics who condemn Feminism.
Drinking beer does not make a woman a feminist.
Let me guess, Mary. You drink beer?
As a woman I’ve actually felt that drinking beer was a masculine thing to do. Never thought anyone else felt that way at all…that’s so interesting!
To me it is masculine and unattractive, we want women who are better than us to keep us grounded, we will go out and take on the world don't want the ways of the world to infect my home as well
@@RulesForRetrogradesand what if she does?
girlies, beware of the male podcasters. They are not the same as male providers who are out there making money
You know, since Adam and Eve, men have been blaming women for their problems and refusing to take responsibility for their own shortcomings. Nothing changes. Adam and Eve were equal partners in the Fall; we both sinned. We both have to make it up . And right now, the patriarchy is not working for the church. Only men can be priests, but men are not stepping up to the plate. So if you want patriarchy, then you, ie men, are going to have to do something about that. So sort it.
You are suggesting what? Priestesses?
You just said Adam and Eve were equal partners and then proceeded to blame men. Also this video is talking not only about feminism but about effeminate men.
@@johnanon658 Nope, I'm suggesting that men take up the role that they reserved for themselves.
Men are leaving. Your problem is being solved.
So it’s more typical of men to blame women than for women to blame men. Just checking your level of sincerity.
I'm in RCIA w/ 2 female teachers. Does anyone know if this is permitted? Something seems off and they were soft on mortal sin saying it's very hard to commit it, and that you should "feel" during Mass, if you should receive the Eucharist. Advice is very appreciated.
@@nicolasdazefilms they are stupid.
Male RCIA teacher here. You shouldn’t receive the Eucharist in a state of mortal sin. Mortal sin needs to meet these conditions: grave, know it is wrong, and do it anyway. It is easier to commit than most of us think. Do not be driven by feelings, but instead use your intellect and will to make a conscious decision. Feelings are fleeting, especially when God challenge us in life. Good luck in your spiritual journey. God bless.
@@steveb5331 Thank you for the great response. I objected to their teachings by saying that you should mistrust yourself and your feelings and look to Church teachings instead... They didn't buy it.
I dislike going to RCIA because of this... even though I love our faith. I dislike being told by women about our faith in this manner. Do you recommend me to keep going there?
God bless.
@@nicolasdazefilmsPerhaps you might seek out a traditional church and find good solid instruction that way.
@@RosietheRiveter11 yeah I would but I live in Sweden. Not many parishes with TLMs here
Since Eve gave a wrong advice to Adam, I never had confidence in women wanting to govern. If married she should put her priority to her family. I'm a woman and I know why some women are evil...Eve always comes up in my mind.
@@lwest46would you actually submit to a strong man or accuse him of being "controlling" and leave? Ponder this question objectively.
If modernism is the synthesis of all heresy then feminism is the synthesis of all sin, Eve would not serve.
That is your opinion. The first and worst sin is Pride -- it was lucifer who would not serve, not Eve.
@@rccyberwarrior2267 Eve wouldn't serve either, Lucifer wasn't human
My goodness 🤣🤣🤣 this is really bad content.
What is the problem?
All I hear is platitudes and generalities.
You want strong men ?
Give me a specific road map on how to become one.
Tell her no
@@crevecouer6772 Ok I am a widow and was married for many years to a strong man. He was kind and generous, he saw the good. His first wife died and he raised his two daughters very well. He was highly intelligent and wise. We never quibbled over who does what as our relationship was built on respect and love. A strong man is one whose foundation is Christ and who acts and behaved as Christ would.
That describes my late husband!!!
"FAKING IT AT FATIMA".
(2015 piece)
. . .The jig is up.
What does that mean?
IM NEVER GONNA STOP
The nature of the snake .
The snake is the woman .
Nothing new at all .
Just blind men,
Also not new
Catholics have some serious issues with women.
Your analysis is off. The snake isn't the woman, the snake is Satan. Woman isn't Satan, she is human. And men aren't blind, they are cowardly. The nature of women has been corrupted by original sin to want to control. And the nature of men has been corrupted by original sin to cede control.
Yet it's a woman that crushes the snake with her feet...
@@Maiseymax696 obviously ,
The worst enemy of a woman are women .
@@Maiseymax696 obviously , the worst of a woman are women .