I really enjoyed the conversations with these 2 guys .. dr peter I get a lot of insight from ur talks... Plus how u talk to lance so much respect and understanding... As far as lance Im not mad at you for ur accomplishments in life.
Dr. Attia asks about all the correct metrics: VO2 Max, power meters, food intake, protein, heart rate, hang time. Lance’s answer: “Nah…” Meanwhile, Lance kicks ass in the gym and is modest when he says he gets killed on the bike. He’s comparing himself to high level 25 year olds.
The difference in the skin is also one put a bunch of toxins injected in his body to beat a disease. It ages you from the inside. I know, as a survivor myself.
Chemo, brain surgery, stress of fighting cancer, TRT, no sunscreen, physical stress of his sport, drug and experimental doping while competing, being 2 yo older than peter - It's a lot of things potentially aged him more quickly but seeing a spouse go through cancer treatments - my intuition is it's mostly that followed by everything else.
While obviously not true, there is a grain of truth. There are certainly stories of everyone who did the right thing passing from cancer and those who smoked, drank their entire lives with no issue.
I actually think he misspoke , he was comparing it to heart disease which we have much more control over and we don't have that much control over cancer.
Jreddin, he said scientist. Yes Peter is a physician, which is not a scientist. When you take a step back, he is a RUclips influencer, which is a marketing tactic to claim the title “longevity expert” which is used to promote products he is an investor in, and promote his private practice that is only accessible to the most wealthy individuals. Last time I checked, it was a baseline 150k annually just to start as a patient of Peter? I’m sure that is not all inclusive, and you end up paying quite a bit more. Anyway, his primary interest is financial, and that should be obvious to everyone
I don’t usually engage in comments, but your remarks here need addressing. While I understand that opinions differ, it's important to recognize that most cancer initiation is indeed stochastic. This is an axiomatic fact of biology. Beyond well-established risk factors like smoking, obesity (likely via insulin resistance), and a few known toxins, the majority of cancer cases cannot be attributed to clear environmental triggers or genetic predispositions. Our DNA undergoes changes constantly, and in most cases, these are either repaired or cells undergo programmed cell death (or autophagy) without further consequence. However, when these chance mutations aren't corrected and lead to oncogenesis or the inhibition of tumor suppression, combined with immune evasion, cancer can develop. Describing these mutations as "bad luck" is simply shorthand for explaining that these mutations occur independently of any actions by the patient, aside from the known causal factors mentioned. If you believe differently, I would suggest reviewing the work of leading oncologists and cancer biologists who specialize in this area. Your comment suggests otherwise, and I’d encourage you to explore the evidence further. A good starting point would be the groundbreaking research by Bert Vogelstein, particularly this seminal study: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1260825. I hope this will provide clarity and context for a more informed discussion. Read more, chirp less.
highlight surely the irony that lance whose entire professional career is based on cheating now has a moral issue viewing overweight people taking semaglutide as somehow cheating obesity 🤣
@@davidgow7131not true, as EPO was in the pro peloton by 1990, if not earlier - look at the sudden rise in Italian riders such as Bugno, Chiapucci and others who had been average to decent pros, and were suddenly winning races left, right and centre. Aside from that, Lance was still an amazing athlete with an incredible hunger for victory.
I really enjoyed the conversations with these 2 guys .. dr peter I get a lot of insight from ur talks... Plus how u talk to lance so much respect and understanding... As far as lance Im not mad at you for ur accomplishments in life.
Dr. Attia asks about all the correct metrics: VO2 Max, power meters, food intake, protein, heart rate, hang time. Lance’s answer: “Nah…” Meanwhile, Lance kicks ass in the gym and is modest when he says he gets killed on the bike. He’s comparing himself to high level 25 year olds.
Rolling and being able to challenge at the end of a fast group ride (the hot ones), when you're 55yo, it's a pretty good feeling.
Amazing these two guys are the same age. The difference in their faces is wearing sunscreen vs not.
The difference in the skin is also one put a bunch of toxins injected in his body to beat a disease. It ages you from the inside. I know, as a survivor myself.
Nah just different genetics mostly.
@@jeffsharp4982 Not at all. Lance said she's never worn sunscreen, and it shows. years and years of cycling and running in the sun.
Chemo, brain surgery, stress of fighting cancer, TRT, no sunscreen, physical stress of his sport, drug and experimental doping while competing, being 2 yo older than peter - It's a lot of things potentially aged him more quickly but seeing a spouse go through cancer treatments - my intuition is it's mostly that followed by everything else.
I can’t believe Attia met with Lance. And I am still confused how Lance has the face to go in line. Amazing
Peter Attias FTP is 1,5 W/kg. But he keeps it secret.
What happened to JB Hager? I have not seen him since to TDF podcasts.
I'm a big fan of my daily beer or glass of wine. AG1, not so much.
This guy clearly doesn't understand that they use trick bars at those carnivals
Always good to hear these two chat but nothing new here, just two dudes inflating their egos.
Just lost all respect for Peter. "Most cases of cancer are due to bad luck." Unsubscribed to his social.
While obviously not true, there is a grain of truth. There are certainly stories of everyone who did the right thing passing from cancer and those who smoked, drank their entire lives with no issue.
I actually think he misspoke , he was comparing it to heart disease which we have much more control over and we don't have that much control over cancer.
He is just a fitness RUclipsr not a genuine scientist
I don’t take his words too seriously, just entertainment
Jreddin, he said scientist. Yes Peter is a physician, which is not a scientist. When you take a step back, he is a RUclips influencer, which is a marketing tactic to claim the title “longevity expert” which is used to promote products he is an investor in, and promote his private practice that is only accessible to the most wealthy individuals. Last time I checked, it was a baseline 150k annually just to start as a patient of Peter? I’m sure that is not all inclusive, and you end up paying quite a bit more. Anyway, his primary interest is financial, and that should be obvious to everyone
I don’t usually engage in comments, but your remarks here need addressing. While I understand that opinions differ, it's important to recognize that most cancer initiation is indeed stochastic. This is an axiomatic fact of biology. Beyond well-established risk factors like smoking, obesity (likely via insulin resistance), and a few known toxins, the majority of cancer cases cannot be attributed to clear environmental triggers or genetic predispositions.
Our DNA undergoes changes constantly, and in most cases, these are either repaired or cells undergo programmed cell death (or autophagy) without further consequence. However, when these chance mutations aren't corrected and lead to oncogenesis or the inhibition of tumor suppression, combined with immune evasion, cancer can develop. Describing these mutations as "bad luck" is simply shorthand for explaining that these mutations occur independently of any actions by the patient, aside from the known causal factors mentioned.
If you believe differently, I would suggest reviewing the work of leading oncologists and cancer biologists who specialize in this area. Your comment suggests otherwise, and I’d encourage you to explore the evidence further. A good starting point would be the groundbreaking research by Bert Vogelstein, particularly this seminal study: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1260825. I hope this will provide clarity and context for a more informed discussion. Read more, chirp less.
highlight surely the irony that lance whose entire professional career is based on cheating now has a moral issue viewing overweight people taking semaglutide as somehow cheating obesity 🤣
@@davidgow7131not true, as EPO was in the pro peloton by 1990, if not earlier - look at the sudden rise in Italian riders such as Bugno, Chiapucci and others who had been average to decent pros, and were suddenly winning races left, right and centre.
Aside from that, Lance was still an amazing athlete with an incredible hunger for victory.
Jan’s jersey, 🥲🥲🥲