Wood County Court Common Pleas case where three attorneys have been appointed two of which were granted withdrawal leaving defendant without defense counsel providing effective assistance of counsel Motion To Compel Formal Motion for Order forcing prosecuting attorney to deliver or police dept. To provide all evidence recordings audio video cop car cams, police body cams recordings of police dispatch call of complaint investigation was not turned over or delivered leaving defense counsel without full discovery evidence being turned over evidence was not turned over and now only partial evidence in control of states attorney has been delivered. The police agency or states attorney cannot now withold destroy not make available evidence essential to the defense of charges in case. Two attorneys thru no fault of defendant were permitted to withdraw the case is a Dec.2020 case and counsel advised defendant to waive his right to a fast speedy trial without being provided full complete evidence discovery being delivered or compelled by appointed counsel. Third counsel was appointed all three attorneys alumni of Toledo University, have not compelled the opponant by motion by defense rule 16 Defendant's own statements given to police at time of investigation complaint recordings audio video cop car cams, to clarify arrest evidence, police assaulted defendant the defendant made statements his sister had also assaulted battered defendant police body cam recordings videos would present evidence of impeachment misrepresentation by police who withheld defendant's statements what would show impeachment of officers and alleged victim's statements evidence upon defense counsel must rely to provide effective representation in essence now being withheld by attorney for State also being held back by excuses police are deliberately withholding such evidence is required by law and Rule 16 and also under Brady vs. Maryland must be compelled by Court Order to obtain all evidence in control of police videos audios dispatch call recording butchered erased only given question hello perrysburg twnshp. Police dispatch alleged victim was questioned but tape was blank for her answers when defense counsel has a duty to file Formal discovery evidencr request for Court Order to Compell A Motion to Compell must be filed to get withheld discovery evidence. The other two attorneys appointed to defend withdrew when only a partial evidence was provided .Now we both know unless and until dicovery all evidence facts upon which defense counsel relies hss not been provided attorney third one is trying to tell me everyting has been provided which hasn't formally requested or provided withheld What am I supposed to do? Sincerely, Troy Stoll
Can I file a motion to receive the statements from a search warrant that it reasonable for my case. For example, holding a policemen accountable for entering the wrong home?
Yes fill out an open records request. Also do a complaint form from the agency that broke in. And I show you how to get a quick 25Thousand Respond back to me b4 Statue of limitations ends. When did this happen?
if 16.3 says grand jury transcripts are part of disclosure and a trebus letter is sent to the prosecuction, then how is the defense to know the letter was submitted for the grad jury you review before indictment if they do not disclose the transcript? - Trebus moved to remand a grand jury's indictment for a new determination of probable cause. See Rule 12.9, Ariz.R.Crim.P. Trebus contends the trial judge abused his discretion by refusing to remand this case because the prosecutor had deprived him of the right to make a written request to present explanatory evidence to the grand jury pursuant to A.R.S. § 21-412. We granted review to examine the responsibility of a prosecutor who learns that a defendant wishes to present exculpatory evidence or testify before a grand jury. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3) and Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P.
The explanation of the process of when a counsel should be appointed to an indigent defendant. It is important that legal counsel is present before a plea is entered.
all they need to do is put someone in front of him in a room and those eyes...well, they'd be saying "I confess! I did it. Now PLEASE let me get away from this guy and those eyes!"
Wood County Court Common Pleas case where three attorneys have been appointed two of which were granted withdrawal leaving defendant without defense counsel providing effective assistance of counsel Motion To Compel Formal Motion for Order forcing prosecuting attorney to deliver or police dept. To provide all evidence recordings audio video cop car cams, police body cams recordings of police dispatch call of complaint investigation was not turned over or delivered leaving defense counsel without full discovery evidence being turned over evidence was not turned over and now only partial evidence in control of states attorney has been delivered. The police agency or states attorney cannot now withold destroy not make available evidence essential to the defense of charges in case. Two attorneys thru no fault of defendant were permitted to withdraw the case is a Dec.2020 case and counsel advised defendant to waive his right to a fast speedy trial without being provided full complete evidence discovery being delivered or compelled by appointed counsel. Third counsel was appointed all three attorneys alumni of Toledo University, have not compelled the opponant by motion by defense rule 16
Defendant's own statements given to police at time of investigation complaint recordings audio video cop car cams, to clarify arrest evidence, police assaulted defendant the defendant made statements his sister had also assaulted battered defendant police body cam recordings videos would present evidence of impeachment misrepresentation by police who withheld defendant's statements what would show impeachment of officers and alleged victim's statements evidence upon defense counsel must rely to provide effective representation in essence now being withheld by attorney for State also being held back by excuses police are deliberately withholding such evidence is required by law and Rule 16 and also under Brady vs. Maryland must be compelled by Court Order to obtain all evidence in control of police videos audios dispatch call recording butchered erased only given question hello perrysburg twnshp. Police dispatch alleged victim was questioned but tape was blank for her answers when defense counsel has a duty to file Formal discovery evidencr request for Court Order to Compell A Motion to Compell must be filed to get withheld discovery evidence. The other two attorneys appointed to defend withdrew when only a partial evidence was provided
.Now we both know unless and until dicovery all evidence facts upon which defense counsel relies hss not been provided attorney third one is trying to tell me everyting has been provided which hasn't formally requested or provided withheld What am I supposed to do? Sincerely,
Troy Stoll
Can I file a motion to receive the statements from a search warrant that it reasonable for my case. For example, holding a policemen accountable for entering the wrong home?
Yes fill out an open records request. Also do a complaint form from the agency that broke in. And I show you how to get a quick 25Thousand
Respond back to me b4 Statue of limitations ends. When did this happen?
if 16.3 says grand jury transcripts are part of disclosure and a trebus letter is sent to the prosecuction, then how is the defense to know the letter was submitted for the grad jury you review before indictment if they do not disclose the transcript? - Trebus moved to remand a grand jury's indictment for a new determination of probable cause. See Rule 12.9, Ariz.R.Crim.P. Trebus contends the trial judge abused his discretion by refusing to remand this case because the prosecutor had deprived him of the right to make a written request to present explanatory evidence to the grand jury pursuant to A.R.S. § 21-412. We granted review to examine the responsibility of a prosecutor who learns that a defendant wishes to present exculpatory evidence or testify before a grand jury. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3) and Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P.
The explanation of the process of when a counsel should be appointed to an indigent defendant. It is important that legal counsel is present before a plea is entered.
Hope updates are forthcoming.
VERY CLEAR, THANK YOU FOR THE WORKS.
the guy with the glasses NEVER blinks
all they need to do is put someone in front of him in a room and those eyes...well, they'd be saying "I confess! I did it. Now PLEASE let me get away from this guy and those eyes!"
i meant are not part of disclosure.
Can you change your plea to guilty after a pretrail?
Gosh. He doesn't blink.
And he never will
thanks
actually he does at 5:41
Fun and excitement that's how they see this shit, as a damn game?
if eyes could kill.
Lol RIP 🪦
his expression is priceless. Hes on some sort of drug, probably prescription, but hes whacked out.
nvm lazy eye. and his eyebrow is raised on his good eye.
@ctbrading and look at his eyebrows!
4:32