Construction of foundation for onshore wind turbine

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 76

  • @Knuck_Knucks
    @Knuck_Knucks 2 дня назад +2

    Thank you SO MUCH for demonstrating the absolute inefficiency of windmill construction relative to energy output! 🐿

  • @wozt3257
    @wozt3257 3 месяца назад +10

    Now do it 1000s more times across the countryside and pat yourself on the back for saving the environment.

  • @jennybridge6276
    @jennybridge6276 8 дней назад +2

    This should b compulsory viewing for every "Greenie". What does this cost???

  • @pablolabarta5611
    @pablolabarta5611 2 года назад +30

    Wow, zero carbon emission with magical concrete, magical steel and on and on

    • @kim2796
      @kim2796 2 года назад +5

      zero carbone emission ? it's a joke ? lol

    • @dimitristsekeris1821
      @dimitristsekeris1821 2 месяца назад +1

      It's much better than lignite mining.

    • @thibauddu6868
      @thibauddu6868 Месяц назад +2

      You do realize that before generating energy, obviously it needs to be built and that would consume energy. Then you need to consider it's whole lifecycle, between 20 and 25 years, how much electricity it has generated and how much it has cost to build and maintain. The result is largely positive.

  • @saltyprunz
    @saltyprunz 9 месяцев назад +5

    Some many ecological experts in the world

  • @curtislowe4577
    @curtislowe4577 3 года назад +5

    Thank you for showing that under the rebar reinforced foundation the puddle of concrete it is built over is not much more than a thin layer of soil prep.

    • @michaelwayne4568
      @michaelwayne4568 10 месяцев назад +1

      That thin layer is called Phil flow

  • @saraswatih9703
    @saraswatih9703 2 месяца назад +5

    And how exactly this could be considered a green solution?

  • @johnmcentegart007
    @johnmcentegart007 Год назад +4

    A Friction foundation would probably use much less concrete and steel to achieve the required torque at maximum wind load plus headroom

  • @sovereignjoe5730
    @sovereignjoe5730 10 месяцев назад +6

    Do you know many roads need to be constructed to enable the delivery & erection of just one wind turbine & what's the average life of a wind turbine & do they all get scrapped in an ecological way & are birds, humans & other creatures effected negatively by wind turbines?

    • @doriga2009
      @doriga2009 10 месяцев назад +3

      Totally agree with you,, the amount of energy of material is ridiculous, it should be forbidden to install in mountains of special protection areas. 😢

    • @dimitristsekeris1821
      @dimitristsekeris1821 2 месяца назад +1

      Literally one dirt road.

  • @Sawasdeekat
    @Sawasdeekat Год назад +5

    Great video, how many tons of concrete are needed to hold that thing down?

    • @jimmytwostones
      @jimmytwostones Год назад

      Looking at the I’d guess about 2000 ton of concrete and maybe 100 ton steel. Didn’t look like they compacted the backfill they used to cover it but if they did there’d be possibly another couple of thousand ton dirt on top of the concrete

    • @colleenking6229
      @colleenking6229 9 месяцев назад

      @@jimmytwostones It takes 8 tonnes of coal, with 4 tonnes of iron ore and 1 tonne of limestone to make just 1 tonne of steel. And the Greenies want to stop coal mining to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions. ????????? I think there is a whole heap of hypercriticism going on in government over the issues.

  • @themiyaadikari4140
    @themiyaadikari4140 Год назад +4

    How many MW for this base?

  • @mariorojasg
    @mariorojasg 2 года назад +3

    Is this anchor bolt cage foundation or just concrete foundation? Thanks

  • @Vikinatorn
    @Vikinatorn 3 года назад +5

    Interesting video, thanks for sharing. No piles? That surprised me.

    • @captinhoop
      @captinhoop 5 месяцев назад +1

      I’m surprised more don’t fall over to be honest.

    • @brianletter3545
      @brianletter3545 Месяц назад

      @@captinhoop Probably built to a 'max. wind speed spec.' There may well be an agreed anemometer somewhere around.🤒

  • @openyoureyes3901
    @openyoureyes3901 Год назад +4

    And how do we remove this little foundation?

  • @DarrellDevenny
    @DarrellDevenny 6 месяцев назад +6

    These things will never break even with the energy needed to produce them and install them. Not even close to being “green”.

    • @StarshipCruiser1749
      @StarshipCruiser1749 5 месяцев назад

      You can't honestly believe that.. they operate for 20+ years.

    • @steveatkins814
      @steveatkins814 3 месяца назад

      @@StarshipCruiser1749why so many blades in landfill now?

    • @jarek0737
      @jarek0737 2 месяца назад

      ​@StarshipCruiser1749 Okay, tell me of a single site that has had a turbine operate for even ten years without any major maintenance? I will wait...

    • @StarshipCruiser1749
      @StarshipCruiser1749 2 месяца назад +1

      @@jarek0737
      1. Roscoe Wind Farm in Sweetwater Texas.
      Operational since 2009
      2. Fenton Wind Farm, Chandler MN.
      Operational since 1994
      3. Maple Ridge Wind Farm, Lowville NY
      Operational since 2006.
      Sorry to keep you waiting.

    • @eifeldude1
      @eifeldude1 2 месяца назад

      @@steveatkins814blades are now recyclable lol

  • @mokoyanuar
    @mokoyanuar 3 месяца назад +3

    not using piling for foundation??

    • @brianletter3545
      @brianletter3545 Месяц назад +1

      A lot of these will be placed where the bedrock is not far down, I imagine.

    • @braxfield5815
      @braxfield5815 7 дней назад

      Its basically a giant counterweight. Piles would be too light.

  • @tylerpedigo2938
    @tylerpedigo2938 4 года назад +4

    That’s an insane amount of steel. Anyone know how many yards of concrete one of these foundations take?

    • @theartofgregoryevans
      @theartofgregoryevans 2 года назад +2

      Just looked it up... 120- 240 cubic meters. A méter cubed is just à bit bigger than a cubic yard.

    • @redwater4778
      @redwater4778 2 года назад +3

      Over 500 cubic meters

    • @theartofgregoryevans
      @theartofgregoryevans 2 года назад +12

      @@redwater4778 kind of blows thé whole idea off the lid of "ecological." The zéro-charbon industry has big money as a priority- no real care to stop polluting.

    • @derklebob8161
      @derklebob8161 2 года назад +3

      Enough to be impossible to remove.

    • @pablolabarta5611
      @pablolabarta5611 2 года назад +2

      that is correct. An amount of steel , concrete and everything moved, manufactured, and so on with diesel machines...all very renewable! . A windmill of 2MW is about 1600tm ( 1200 of concrete + 70 of steel for foundation + 350 the windmill)

  • @НиколайШлеенко-ц8в
    @НиколайШлеенко-ц8в 3 года назад +2

    good video but grouting operation was cut

  • @LinhKhanh-dm2si
    @LinhKhanh-dm2si 3 года назад +2

    The video sound is pretty good, beyond my imagination

    • @Ellabobel
      @Ellabobel 6 месяцев назад

      It all sounds ‘So-good’ to me -- much like any political ‘too_good_to _be_true’. Typical of political Hocus_Pocus to me!!! By the find out the truth most of us will be dead and gone. They’ll just change the whole situation and still nothing anybody can do.

  • @abdulhaki7652
    @abdulhaki7652 3 года назад +2

    I am intresting take can do it the work with your company civil structure

  • @libertariantranslator1929
    @libertariantranslator1929 8 дней назад

    That thing would could house a small nuclear reactor and actually generate power!

  • @umeshmulimani2443
    @umeshmulimani2443 2 года назад +4

    Good video. Thank you

  • @Frank-co6zp
    @Frank-co6zp 8 дней назад

    crazy!!

  • @iamnode2088
    @iamnode2088 4 года назад +4

    great video

  • @AnilRathod-fo9gy
    @AnilRathod-fo9gy 10 месяцев назад +2

  • @성북구김씨
    @성북구김씨 Год назад +1

    good~~

  • @Q_20
    @Q_20 4 года назад +2

    earth carbon neutral when?

    • @curtislowe4577
      @curtislowe4577 3 года назад +3

      It's a complicated calculation. Here's a comment I've made on other videos:
      I have not yet seen an honest assessment of how much fossil fuel is consumed manufacturing everything related to the foundation. Rebar and concrete require huge amounts of fossil fuel to mine the raw materials, condition/prep the raw materials, make iron then steel then rebar and concrete. Add the steel and copper and composites that make up the wind turbine itself. And finally the entire construction project from site prep to assembly to interconnection.
      I want to know when a wind turbine has produced enough electricity to offset the fossil fuel burned to produce it. I've seen claims that the answer is never.

  • @davebutler3905
    @davebutler3905 2 года назад +2

    So lucky concrete is carbon neutral!!!!
    ?

  • @aladeenmadafaka6286
    @aladeenmadafaka6286 Год назад +14

    Ive heard one windmill doesnot produce energy through whole lifetime which would equal his price to build it. So we have to donate this "green" energy. Whole green deal is such a fake

    • @donmerry
      @donmerry 5 месяцев назад +3

      What energy production is green? None.

    • @eifeldude1
      @eifeldude1 2 месяца назад

      @@donmerrylol bullshit

  • @theartofgregoryevans
    @theartofgregoryevans 2 года назад +3

    Yup, thats an ecological solution.

    • @thetasworld
      @thetasworld Год назад

      Can't get more ecological than this...

    • @theartofgregoryevans
      @theartofgregoryevans Год назад +1

      @@thetasworld For one turbine, 300 cubic yards of cement for the foundation. That's over 2 million pounds each, 40 truckloads of cement! Can you smell carbon foot print ? And the toxicity of the production of the électronics? The mining of the various métals (some ordinary, some bizarre) for both those électronics and the foundation. The severly toxic chemical used in the Labs where components are produced. White coveralls, gloves and booties and respirators for those working on these machines. This is about big business, not about ecology. Then, decommisioning à unit after its 20 year peak of production, and another 10 years for good measure and réputation, and you have masses of nothing reusable. Tons of fiberglass which is pretty much the same as asbestos suitable for the landfills (back to the earth ?) Électronics which required spécial treatment, and oh yeah, à 69 foot block of cement that will never, ever be moved anywhere. LMAO. Do you see how naïve we can be when we rally behind big business that's waving an ECO flag ?

    • @thetasworld
      @thetasworld Год назад

      @@theartofgregoryevans couldn't agree more with you. We have to do some serious reconsidering of this 'green energy production'

    • @panishirovim2888
      @panishirovim2888 Год назад

      Yeah, fuck the trees and the forest and the animals!
      Burn them and go eco mode!
      I wonder how many decades a Steam Electric Station needs to operate in order to produce the fumes of a wildfire! But it is fascism to wonder nowadays! All heil Klaus!

  • @derykhamshaw3362
    @derykhamshaw3362 3 месяца назад +1

    MUST HAVE COST A FORTUNE -- Planning permission put in at Bronte Country for 65 wind turbines the size of Blackpool Tower & if this video is an example then HOW MUCH PEAT will be
    dug up then the experts are correct who have commented on the cost. Loosing all that PEAT with all the roads to 65 turbines & the Flooding with the soak up all lost not including the loss
    of Tourism to Bronte Country. WHO will go on walks from Bronte Parsonage over Ugly Moors with NOISY WIND TURBINES ALL 200 meters high -- ???????????????? --- NO one.

  • @ChattrSingh-u7z
    @ChattrSingh-u7z 3 месяца назад

    यह काम कहां मिलेगा

  • @ariaditya7733
    @ariaditya7733 3 года назад

    Can i get the foundation drawing?

  • @PrashantSingh-pj7nw
    @PrashantSingh-pj7nw 6 месяцев назад

    Ya kuch nAhi hai

  • @fredflintstone8159
    @fredflintstone8159 3 года назад +8

    soooooooooooo, all of the steel, and concrete is manufactured using renewable resources? hahahahahaha

    • @pauloriglio5076
      @pauloriglio5076 3 года назад +1

      The sarcasm isn’t warranted, especially when you didn’t get Curtis’s point.

    • @derklebob8161
      @derklebob8161 2 года назад +4

      And then its put into the ground where it will blight the landscape and never be removed.

    • @omjagdeesh8731
      @omjagdeesh8731 Год назад

      @@derklebob8161 yeah because coal plants emitting soot all over are so much better right?

  • @ChattrSingh-u7z
    @ChattrSingh-u7z 3 месяца назад

    यह मेरे को कांटेक्ट करना है कांटेक्ट नंबर मिलेगा क्या किसी के पास