Toyota meant to be 5 star...Volvo too strong for words. Hardly scratched..Toyota 5 star during careful, lab controlled tests..So what if Toyota is marginally more reliable, only get one life.
Very true! There's no description here to say what the circumstances of this multiple pile up were, the Volvo is certainly rigidly strong, the Avensis behaved exactly as it's supposed to, without intrusion to the cabin space. The Volvo to Audi impact looked to be at a much lower closing speed judging by the relatively minor damage between those two. The Avensis has ploughed into the rear of the Volvo at a greater speed and caught it on the diagonal of the Volvo, this version being an all wheel drive, so more heavy mechanically than the Toyota. The windscreen is intact and the doors open perfectly post impact. The airbags deployed and the driver appears to have stepped out uninjured. Launched in 2003 this model of Avensis has a very safe 5star ncap safety rating and all models had 9 airbags as standard. Yes, it's now a total loss but it protected its occupants ! If this had been in the 1970s someone would have been very injured or dead....!
Wir fahren selbst einen. Unser V 70 ist vor 2 Jahren in einem Mitsubishi Colt eingeschlagen. Das Ergebnis war ungefähr das selbe. Der Mitsubishi hatte keinen Kofferraum mehr und war zusammen geschoben. Am Volvo war eine 2cm breite und 0,5 cm tiefe Beule und ein Clip vom Grill war abgebrochen. Dieses Auto fahren wir immer noch und fühlen uns voll sicher. Ich würde immer wieder Volvo kaufen! 🙋♂️
Pretty much identical results to my '89 Merc W201, that caught a 2005 Clio up its ass. Rear bumper got few scratches, Clio had to call the tow truck. And that was the smallest Merc prior to the A-class, developed in the late '70s.
My dad has a Volvo XC70 exactly like that one. A couple years he was involved in a 40 kph front offset car accident. A lady in her Mazda ran a red and hit him. Her airbags deployed and my dads didn’t. Her car was completely totaled and she had a broken arm and my dads car had damage but not nearly as much as the totaled Mazda. He was fine but the lady broke her arm. Car is now fixed and has had zero issues. Volvo’s are built to last even after an accident.
So you don't see the issue where Volvo engineered there car for its own driver instead of both car crumpling and both could have Walked away without broken arms
The back of the car is way stronger than the front, cause of the crumple zones, and the scenario would be different if that volvo hits that toyotas back
Nope... The Toyota will be crushed same way... The string areas of the Toyota couldn't hit the Volvo... XC70 similar to SUVs is higher and the Toyota did an emergency brake... So it slipped underneath the Volvo... That's it. I had sadly a crash once with my Volvo S70 T5 against a Kia SUV. My Volvo (littlebit lowered) looked the same like that Toyota...
That really is quite incredible, I mean we have all seen the XC70 vs Fiat Ciciquento video, and that makes sense being a tiny poorly built city car. But this was family car vs family car, unreal
I like the XC-70 (was even thinking about buying one) but what you see on this video is not what you might think it is. If one car has less damage than the other, it doesn't necessarily mean it's safer. I've seen a few crashes like this one and have even been involved in two and it's always the same result. No matter what brands/models are involved, it's always the rear end that stays "unscratched" and the front looks like disaster and that's completely normal. Rear end only has little distance between it and the rear passenger seats, so in order to protect the passengers, it's tougher, but in terms of shock absorbance, thats not a good thing, since a lot of force is transfered to the passengers this way. With the front end being far away from passengers, there's a lot of space for metal to bend - and while for a lot of people this may seem like a bad idea and unsafe, front end is designed so that it gives when you crash hard. And that's because in order to absorb the impact, your deceleration must be as slow as possible which is what that design achieves. When you jump and land on the floor from let's say 1m/3ft, you bend your knees to absorb the impact. You might not even want to imagine how bad it would have felt and how bad it might have had ended if your legs would have stayed locked straight. If the Volvo would've had hit the Toyota's rear end, the result would've looked very similar for Volvo, trust me. Once I was driving with my co-worker in a VW Caddy and he was not concentrated on the road and so we crashed into a VW Polo (same brand but a lot smaller car) and it almost wasn't even scratched, while the caddy's front end looked like sh*t.
Not true. I crushed 3 times with my xc90 (2005) front into back and side of other cars. All cars in front had visible damage and one couldn't close back door. My car has no visible damage in the front. I still drive it like nothing happened.
I'm not here to argue with you my friend, but I suggest you take a look at the video where an XC70 crashed into a Scania truck and then tell me that a strong body shell is less important and body for that matter it's not important. Volvos are designed the absorb the impact a lot better then probably any other make of cars. This was a low speed impact . I would rather be in a car that is strong at high speeds than in one that's a write-off at a low speed.
Toyotka pewnie cisła jakieś 80 km/h, skoro udało jej się uszkodzić zderzak Volviacza. W moje v70II uderzył Mercedes w124 przy ok. 60 km/h i nawet nie uszkodził zderzaka.
Same thing happened to me many years ago when I had a old Volvo 245, I almost missed a redlight and slammed the breaks, I succeeded to stop but not the guy behind me, I just saw in my mirror a fast coming car, and prepared my self for the impact. The car hitting me was totally wrecked and had to be towed to the scrap yard, I checked my car and couldn't find any thing exempt from som small scratches on the bumper, a real tank 😃
Repair bill on that volvo will be the same as a new toyota.I like volvo expecially xc70, but toyota behave like it supposed. Dont see anything special in this video.toyota got under a heavier car in the most resistant part of the car -corner
A Ford Focus rear-ended my 2020 XC90. The Ford front-end was completely totaled and all air bags deployed. My xc90 had damage to the rear bumper and side pane. It was utterly amazing. Ford vs. Volvo. Volvo wins by a landslide.
Google says a Volvo typically will last for 20 years, which is much better compared to 15 years of Passat. What I am wondering is how safe could they be after 10/15 years on the road? Airbags, let's say, are guaranteed for ten years to work properly, after that they need to be changed. And there is this 'metal fatigue' issue. A 2005 Volvo xc70 has 16% more metal, which is to assure safety, I guess, compared to a 2008 Forester. Can we say a 2011 and later family sedans are safer than a 2005 XC70? As you see I need ideas here. Thanks.
The people that thinks avensis as a tin can are all dumb,that volvo's rear bumper is too high for avensis's front bumper so avensis hit the volvo on the radiator-motor cover part (and it's the most soft part) as you can see avensis chassis is untouched and front bumper metal is intact And also in general, rear is far rigid than front,show us videos of volvo hitting even a chinese car from behind
wow that toyota must be a ant then if the toyota would have driven under the volvo why wasnt the toyota under the volvo or infront and why is there damage on top of the bumper then?
Had a accident ... i have an avensis, with an bmw, the same thing, bmw crashed totaly, my avensis with tow had nothing, he get under my car thats why Edit : the volvo are trash cars, had one, changed to toyota, even renault are better than volvo
XC70 це танк спору немає,але дане відео нічого не відображає взагалі,особливо якщо в момент аварії водій тормозив, перед відповідно притискає до асфальту і машина заходить під передню як зубило,плюс в лобовій частині авто більше зон деформації,я попадав в подібне дтп на Пассат б5 2.5тді v6 4 motion в'їхав в Кіа ceed,в Кіа зірвало бампер з кріплень,а в пасаті цілий букет(капот,фари,радіато...і т.д) Тому дана ситуація нічого не говорить,просто авенсіс залетів під низ і зім'яло капот
У меня Вольво v50,за этот год уже два ротозея прилетело в зад,первый это форд фокус,у него телевизер ушел в глубь и бампер лопнул,а у меня мелкие царапинки и второй случай,прилетел крузак 150 в зад,но на малой скорости,тоже у меня только царапины,а у крузака немного лопнула нижняя часть бампера.
Totally unfair "test" and impossible to make any conclusion at all. 1) A heavier car always has an advantage. It's not a proof of better safety design. 2) The rear of the car is always stronger and more sturdy. 3) The front of the car is supposed to crumble to absorb and disperse the collision energy.
From the picture it looks as though the Toyota's front partially slid under the rear of the Volvo. From the outside view, the Volvo appears to have survived the crash very well, but what was the damage on the underside of the Volvo?
This is not the volvo the Avensis has crashed into, my word for it! it has had a frontal choc with an other vehicule and just landed afterwards on his back!
I cant believe people still believe that if the front part of you car crumbuled, it mean that you are in a insafe car. It its designed to do that!. In case you were going to hit a pedestrian, you rather hit it with a plastic bumber or a steel one ? Plus, plastic bumpers are required by laws, they are lighter making the car save more fuel economy, have a better performance, it doesnt rust, and more importantly cost less to replace. Seriously the amount of people that still believe that a car should be made completly out of steel and doesnt crumble still amaze me. ( sorry for my bad english )
Compare 0:50 with 0:56 - why are there different gaps between body and rear doors at left and right side? Looks like the whole back end of the car has been twisted anti-clock wise. Which correlates to impact of the Avensis beeing slightly off centre on the Volvo to the right... maybe not so good after all!
The avensis driver: o fuck car is ruined im dead my life is broken While The volvo driver: oh never mind just some little scufs and some small damage but lets carry on
Cars are designed that way, that the front of the car collapses to absorb the force of Crash and soften the blow. If Toyota and Volvo would change places, result would be reversed. Meaning that the back of Toyota would be unharmed, and the front of Volvo would look like Toyota now.
I was rear ended at a slow speed in my 2009 Volvo S80 by a Dodge minivan, the bumper fell off the van and my car didn't have a scratch. Even the paint is tough! 🙂
Я сам езжю на своей Volvo 850 и кайфую тоесть радуюсь каждый Божий день ведь это машина моей мечты !!! На нем ты забываешь страха что можешь умереть или стать инвалидом потому, что он защищает тебя и тех кто находится в ней
This goes to show how overbuilt Volvo Wagons really are!!!! They are literally almost impossible to destroy!!!! That XC70 only needs a new set of bumpers where as the Toyota is finished. But the good news is it looks like nobody was hurt, and the cars held up well, and protected their occupants.
I think people are a bit misguided when it comes to Volvos. There's no such thing as a 'safe car' it's luck of the draw in a crash really. I drive a Volvo V70 but I'm under no illusion it will save me in a serious collision. The Volvo cars of today are a joke to be honest. Safety is a driver that is constantly aware and on the look out for others misconduct on the road! I hate when people use the word 'tank' also, as you can't change the laws of physics. Safe car is a marketing gimmick for sure, I've heard small hatchbacks being called safe cars! It's a safe car as long as your not hit by a truck!
Every car that hits other car from the back takes more damage! I was driving Dacia Sandero 2009 and one girl hit my car on my back. Her car was destroyed, mine was perfectly fine! It is not about the brand. All cars are fragile on the front! It is a safety feature.
Wow, a car goes under the rear bumper of a larger estate car, and come off worse. Check out S70 crash test, or S60/80 no standard passenger bag. All modern cars are safe now.
It's not because Volvo is tough. There were some years ago when sedans, SUVs, pick-up's, and trucks did not align their bumper and this is a classic case. The result has been huge damage to the smaller cars when hitting bigger cars becaus their bumpers were too low so all the impact went directly to the hood and all the components within. Volvos are safe but doesn't mean they're so tough. In fact if they're xrumple zones are too tough, that would make them less safe.
Northernspear Im a Volvo driver. I do consider my Volvo tough. Its been broken but never left me stranded. I drove it 800 miles with an obvious leaking gas tank on a the donut with a shoestring timing belt. It cut off in the driveway as I pulled up. Its tough enough for me!!! Ive been in a few crashes over the years in Volvo's and walked away. Im not wrenching shit or crossing the Mojave or tractor pulling. I dont need a roll or to pull a 40ft camper up the mountain. Its a Volvo, not a pickup. So what if someone calls it "tough".
If crumple zone is soft like for Toyota then at low speed crash ex:40km/h, you will have a lot more greater comfort then in Volvo but at high speed crash ex:80km/h, that soft crumple zone will render useless and person in volvo will survive but but that in Toyota may not
For the whole comparison we need to see the same situation with volvo behind Toyota. Because the front part of all cars are made so that it just works like harmonica, like a big airbag.
my vw scirocco lost to a 1998 honda accord in the same way. the honda was only scratched and my front end was totalled. we are all under maximum braking when crashed.
Sempre questi filmati con volvo tamponare da dietro ....ma si sa che la macchina che urta una davanti nel suo senso di marcia si distrugge. Lo vediamo sulle strade di tutti i giorni. Questi video non dicono niente.
My Volvo S80 review
ruclips.net/video/v271EqGsW9c/видео.html
Subtitles! Субтитры!
The strength of Volvo simply put is beyond incredible sometimes....even as a Volvo owner and driver for years now, it never seizes to amaze me ❤️
Toyota meant to be 5 star...Volvo too strong for words. Hardly scratched..Toyota 5 star during careful, lab controlled tests..So what if Toyota is marginally more reliable, only get one life.
I think that you mean 'it never 'ceases' to amaze.... Now, VOLVO for LIFE!!!
Almost makes me cry. I have two XC70’s. They are the most beautiful, elegant, battle tanks on the road. I wouldn’t put my family in anything less.
TNA2Me why u buy 2 the same?
Yao Li bruh one volvo is never enough
I love my XC70. I just couldn't imagine life without it. Once you have experienced Volvo you wouldn't want to own anything else.
TNA2Me; I have a 2004 XC70 Battle Tank myself actually my wife owns the car. 147K and she is just broken in....the car that is....
I have XC70 D5 and XC60 D5 I love my Volvos. Volvo for life
Really like the channel but please cut it with the cringe music 24/7
VolvoRaggare there’s something called a mute button.
God just turn it down and quit moaning about it for fuck same
My S40 is named 'Sia' because she is Titanium.. grey metallic! Daya is the fucking Toyota.
Yeah, absolute bullsxxt
@@adamv242 Moms V70 is called the Swedish Panzer Elite because it's a damn tank
So the crumple zones in the Avensis worked, and absorbed the force like they should ^^
Very true! There's no description here to say what the circumstances of this multiple pile up were, the Volvo is certainly rigidly strong, the Avensis behaved exactly as it's supposed to, without intrusion to the cabin space. The Volvo to Audi impact looked to be at a much lower closing speed judging by the relatively minor damage between those two. The Avensis has ploughed into the rear of the Volvo at a greater speed and caught it on the diagonal of the Volvo, this version being an all wheel drive, so more heavy mechanically than the Toyota. The windscreen is intact and the doors open perfectly post impact. The airbags deployed and the driver appears to have stepped out uninjured. Launched in 2003 this model of Avensis has a very safe 5star ncap safety rating and all models had 9 airbags as standard. Yes, it's now a total loss but it protected its occupants ! If this had been in the 1970s someone would have been very injured or dead....!
Ammageddon89 There isnt any crumple zone left.....
It looks like it absorbed a little too much
There's a difference between a crumple zone and a car crumpling like a tin can.
Ammageddon89 yes they did. Occupants went to the hospital and the car went to the scrapyard. .. the volvo went home with the family it protected...
Volvo’s top reputation is being as strong as a tank, the true “built like a rock”
Wir fahren selbst einen. Unser V 70 ist vor 2 Jahren in einem Mitsubishi Colt eingeschlagen. Das Ergebnis war ungefähr das selbe. Der Mitsubishi hatte keinen Kofferraum mehr und war zusammen geschoben. Am Volvo war eine 2cm breite und 0,5 cm tiefe Beule und ein Clip vom Grill war abgebrochen. Dieses Auto fahren wir immer noch und fühlen uns voll sicher. Ich würde immer wieder Volvo kaufen! 🙋♂️
Scotty Kilmer needs to see this
;-) ruclips.net/video/Qwa0Qc2qlNA/видео.html
when it comes to safety Toyota sux but it does save gas lol but who cares about gas if your life is in danger
Качество volvo 🔥🔥🔥🔥
"Volvo" is another name of tank. 😂😂😂💗💗💗
aka Stridsvagn 122
yo mom is a tank
Pretty much identical results to my '89 Merc W201, that caught a 2005 Clio up its ass. Rear bumper got few scratches, Clio had to call the tow truck. And that was the smallest Merc prior to the A-class, developed in the late '70s.
My dad has a Volvo XC70 exactly like that one. A couple years he was involved in a 40 kph front offset car accident. A lady in her Mazda ran a red and hit him. Her airbags deployed and my dads didn’t. Her car was completely totaled and she had a broken arm and my dads car had damage but not nearly as much as the totaled Mazda. He was fine but the lady broke her arm. Car is now fixed and has had zero issues. Volvo’s are built to last even after an accident.
my dad has a 2005 Volvo v70 it looks like new and they havent had a single problem
Not mine. Mind you, frontal offset at 80 is different than 40
Dude don't talk shit
So you don't see the issue where Volvo engineered there car for its own driver instead of both car crumpling and both could have Walked away without broken arms
одна из самых безопасных марок авто.
Сделано с заботой о людях и любовью до того, что и как необходимо сделать
The back of the car is way stronger than the front, cause of the crumple zones, and the scenario would be different if that volvo hits that toyotas back
xXxDEMANJENIYAxXx Correct
Nope... The Toyota will be crushed same way... The string areas of the Toyota couldn't hit the Volvo... XC70 similar to SUVs is higher and the Toyota did an emergency brake... So it slipped underneath the Volvo... That's it.
I had sadly a crash once with my Volvo S70 T5 against a Kia SUV. My Volvo (littlebit lowered) looked the same like that Toyota...
If Toyota wouldn't crush it would be bad for toyota driver because all of the energy would be transferred through drivers body
That toyota would be smashed and I bet you could still drive the volvo after
xXxDEMANJENIYAxXx yeah, the volvo would go through the avensis :^)
The same thing happened when someone crashed in to my V60. The police wondered who the guy crashed in to.
Yes same hahaha
In first they said it's a hid and run but I was still there
Music fatal
That really is quite incredible, I mean we have all seen the XC70 vs Fiat Ciciquento video, and that makes sense being a tiny poorly built city car. But this was family car vs family car, unreal
Volvo is like a Tank 💯💯💯👍👍 good job Volvo.
Despite damage difference it would be a lot of laugh if the repair of cost will be the same :)
I like the XC-70 (was even thinking about buying one) but what you see on this video is not what you might think it is. If one car has less damage than the other, it doesn't necessarily mean it's safer. I've seen a few crashes like this one and have even been involved in two and it's always the same result. No matter what brands/models are involved, it's always the rear end that stays "unscratched" and the front looks like disaster and that's completely normal. Rear end only has little distance between it and the rear passenger seats, so in order to protect the passengers, it's tougher, but in terms of shock absorbance, thats not a good thing, since a lot of force is transfered to the passengers this way. With the front end being far away from passengers, there's a lot of space for metal to bend - and while for a lot of people this may seem like a bad idea and unsafe, front end is designed so that it gives when you crash hard. And that's because in order to absorb the impact, your deceleration must be as slow as possible which is what that design achieves. When you jump and land on the floor from let's say 1m/3ft, you bend your knees to absorb the impact. You might not even want to imagine how bad it would have felt and how bad it might have had ended if your legs would have stayed locked straight. If the Volvo would've had hit the Toyota's rear end, the result would've looked very similar for Volvo, trust me. Once I was driving with my co-worker in a VW Caddy and he was not concentrated on the road and so we crashed into a VW Polo (same brand but a lot smaller car) and it almost wasn't even scratched, while the caddy's front end looked like sh*t.
O doubt mate.dont think if instead that Volvo there would be some Corsa the result would be same
Not true. I crushed 3 times with my xc90 (2005) front into back and side of other cars. All cars in front had visible damage and one couldn't close back door. My car has no visible damage in the front. I still drive it like nothing happened.
You must be a terrible driver
I'm not here to argue with you my friend, but I suggest you take a look at the video where an XC70 crashed into a Scania truck and then tell me that a strong body shell is less important and body for that matter it's not important. Volvos are designed the absorb the impact a lot better then probably any other make of cars. This was a low speed impact . I would rather be in a car that is strong at high speeds than in one that's a write-off at a low speed.
Это такой случай типо встал оттряхнулся и пошел дальше
Toyotka pewnie cisła jakieś 80 km/h, skoro udało jej się uszkodzić zderzak Volviacza. W moje v70II uderzył Mercedes w124 przy ok. 60 km/h i nawet nie uszkodził zderzaka.
Same thing happened to me many years ago when I had a old Volvo 245, I almost missed a redlight and slammed the breaks, I succeeded to stop but not the guy behind me, I just saw in my mirror a fast coming car, and prepared my self for the impact.
The car hitting me was totally wrecked and had to be towed to the scrap yard, I checked my car and couldn't find any thing exempt from som small scratches on the bumper, a real tank 😃
Repair bill on that volvo will be the same as a new toyota.I like volvo expecially xc70, but toyota behave like it supposed. Dont see anything special in this video.toyota got under a heavier car in the most resistant part of the car -corner
Its not gonna be that expensive even if you said it as a joke
@@Antilaakeri Not that expensive, for sure, you can buy a used toyota that is mechanically sound for the same price as the repairs for that Volvo lol.
Its not hard. And not that expensive. Just do your own repair
I love volvo
Nothing's like volvo. Volvo for life.
Pablo yeah. Mine old V70 have around 401.000km behind him and it's driving like to be in heaven😇
Volvo el mejor para la protección en carretera
So same thing a Volvo crasch into a Audi.. The Volvo was not so fine. Rip Volvo
A Ford Focus rear-ended my 2020 XC90. The Ford front-end was completely totaled and all air bags deployed. My xc90 had damage to the rear bumper and side pane. It was utterly amazing. Ford vs. Volvo. Volvo wins by a landslide.
Google says a Volvo typically will last for 20 years, which is much better compared to 15 years of Passat. What I am wondering is how safe could they be after 10/15 years on the road? Airbags, let's say, are guaranteed for ten years to work properly, after that they need to be changed. And there is this 'metal fatigue' issue. A 2005 Volvo xc70 has 16% more metal, which is to assure safety, I guess, compared to a 2008 Forester. Can we say a 2011 and later family sedans are safer than a 2005 XC70? As you see I need ideas here. Thanks.
Если мы не в компьютерной симуляции, то почему у Вольво отключены повреждения а у других нет??
Да там металл вообще офигеешь
потому-что это VOLVO !!! это вам не шо попало!
0:06 Crashing, Hit a wall lol
I'm sorry your visit to the Netherlands got you caught in a crash. I hope you have more luck next time. Most of us drive more careful lthen that :)
The people that thinks avensis as a tin can are all dumb,that volvo's rear bumper is too high for avensis's front bumper so avensis hit the volvo on the radiator-motor cover part (and it's the most soft part) as you can see avensis chassis is untouched and front bumper metal is intact
And also in general, rear is far rigid than front,show us videos of volvo hitting even a chinese car from behind
Volvo car monstr.. Respect your from ARMENIA 🇦🇲👍☝️⚠️
Stupid comparison, the toyota dove under the volvo that's why you see very little damage on the volvo...
wow that toyota must be a ant then if the toyota would have driven under the volvo why wasnt the toyota under the volvo or infront and why is there damage on top of the bumper then?
Agree
Had a accident ... i have an avensis, with an bmw, the same thing, bmw crashed totaly, my avensis with tow had nothing, he get under my car thats why
Edit : the volvo are trash cars, had one, changed to toyota, even renault are better than volvo
I have an 07 S40 and absolutely love it.
Love my Volvo V70 T5!
love you Volvo😘😘😘😘😘
love from INDIA
Nooo I got a scratch on my paint!!
XC70 це танк спору немає,але дане відео нічого не відображає взагалі,особливо якщо в момент аварії водій тормозив, перед відповідно притискає до асфальту і машина заходить під передню як зубило,плюс в лобовій частині авто більше зон деформації,я попадав в подібне дтп на Пассат б5 2.5тді v6 4 motion в'їхав в Кіа ceed,в Кіа зірвало бампер з кріплень,а в пасаті цілий букет(капот,фари,радіато...і т.д)
Тому дана ситуація нічого не говорить,просто авенсіс залетів під низ і зім'яло капот
У меня Вольво v50,за этот год уже два ротозея прилетело в зад,первый это форд фокус,у него телевизер ушел в глубь и бампер лопнул,а у меня мелкие царапинки и второй случай,прилетел крузак 150 в зад,но на малой скорости,тоже у меня только царапины,а у крузака немного лопнула нижняя часть бампера.
Красава
Вот это надёжный автомобиль я тоже себе хочу такую машину
Браво Щведы,браво Вольво номер 1 в мире,твоя жизнь,жизнь твоей семьи,нет ничего дороже!!!
Totally unfair "test" and impossible to make any conclusion at all.
1) A heavier car always has an advantage. It's not a proof of better safety design.
2) The rear of the car is always stronger and more sturdy.
3) The front of the car is supposed to crumble to absorb and disperse the collision energy.
From the picture it looks as though the Toyota's front partially slid under the rear of the Volvo. From the outside view, the Volvo appears to have survived the crash very well, but what was the damage on the underside of the Volvo?
But even if it did some damage, there isn’t allot to break at first place. Maybe exhaust could be damaged.
This is not the volvo the Avensis has crashed into, my word for it! it has had a frontal choc with an other vehicule and just landed afterwards on his back!
I cant believe people still believe that if the front part of you car crumbuled, it mean that you are in a insafe car. It its designed to do that!. In case you were going to hit a pedestrian, you rather hit it with a plastic bumber or a steel one ? Plus, plastic bumpers are required by laws, they are lighter making the car save more fuel economy, have a better performance, it doesnt rust, and more importantly cost less to replace.
Seriously the amount of people that still believe that a car should be made completly out of steel and doesnt crumble still amaze me. ( sorry for my bad english )
I love the fact that all volvo’s don’t give a shit when they crash, or someone crashes into the volvo, volvo will be my first and my last car!
OMG💕🔥
Volvo is the most safety car.
まさでん of VOLVO
You make me very agry
まさでん of VOLVO nope new mercedes e class is the first and only car with 5 stars + on the euro ncap!
no Volvo XC60 is the safest car
mercedes the best volvos safer
simpa You are fucking dumb man. Xc60 is a model from Volvo.
Depleted Uranium bumper as standard
Volvo dont getted damage. VOLVO IS BEST CAR
Compare 0:50 with 0:56 - why are there different gaps between body and rear doors at left and right side? Looks like the whole back end of the car has been twisted anti-clock wise. Which correlates to impact of the Avensis beeing slightly off centre on the Volvo to the right... maybe not so good after all!
Volvo wegon for sale
Miner scratch on rear bumper
Don't buy Japanese car... LMAO
Stupid comparison is not a distant person. If the volvo had come (sat down) under a higher car, then with its face it would be the same.
i hope this car will get fixed properly, not just with duct tape o_O
Arsch Kopp that’s probably all it will need.😂
Temporary fix
This is normal and this behaviour goes back 46 years to the 240 !
you can polish the scratches out on the volvo
Надутое, горбатое правое крыло, подлежит замене. И полу багажнике издец. Интересно, что с крышей?
The avensis driver: o fuck car is ruined im dead my life is broken
While
The volvo driver: oh never mind just some little scufs and some small damage but lets carry on
Cars are designed that way, that the front of the car collapses to absorb the force of Crash and soften the blow.
If Toyota and Volvo would change places, result would be reversed.
Meaning that the back of Toyota would be unharmed, and the front of Volvo would look like Toyota now.
Volvo Forever! Only one car I stick to)
I was rear ended at a slow speed in my 2009 Volvo S80 by a Dodge minivan, the bumper fell off the van and my car didn't have a scratch. Even the paint is tough! 🙂
💪🏻
Я сам езжю на своей Volvo 850 и кайфую тоесть радуюсь каждый Божий день ведь это машина моей мечты !!! На нем ты забываешь страха что можешь умереть или стать инвалидом потому, что он защищает тебя и тех кто находится в ней
Да!!! В ноябре автобус мне дорогу не уступил, влетел я на 850 прям в переднюю балку... Только она и спасла!!!!
This goes to show how overbuilt Volvo Wagons really are!!!! They are literally almost impossible to destroy!!!! That XC70 only needs a new set of bumpers where as the Toyota is finished.
But the good news is it looks like nobody was hurt, and the cars held up well, and protected their occupants.
haha! Fucked up that Toyota! Volvo power!
Front must be soft. Collision should last long. 2008 avensis was safest car in Sweden.
love Volvo I have 1.6 (😬) Volvo s40 in silver love it
I think people are a bit misguided when it comes to Volvos. There's no such thing as a 'safe car' it's luck of the draw in a crash really. I drive a Volvo V70 but I'm under no illusion it will save me in a serious collision. The Volvo cars of today are a joke to be honest. Safety is a driver that is constantly aware and on the look out for others misconduct on the road! I hate when people use the word 'tank' also, as you can't change the laws of physics. Safe car is a marketing gimmick for sure, I've heard small hatchbacks being called safe cars! It's a safe car as long as your not hit by a truck!
If it had been an standard v70 i think it would got alot more damage. But still, the Toyota is crushed and did its Job.
first words of the background song was I have hit a wall 😂
The Avensis did
A wall with a Volvo badge
Volvo uses bore steel, the worlds strongest steel..
Daily Struggle Swedish steel
XC90 uses 7x stronger steel than normal steel
Not vibranium?
wrong, the strongest steel is stalinium
It's boron steel and no its not the strongest
2 accidents wtf
Every car that hits other car from the back takes more damage! I was driving Dacia Sandero 2009 and one girl hit my car on my back. Her car was destroyed, mine was perfectly fine! It is not about the brand. All cars are fragile on the front! It is a safety feature.
Wow, a car goes under the rear bumper of a larger estate car, and come off worse. Check out S70 crash test, or S60/80 no standard passenger bag. All modern cars are safe now.
Did you really have to get a tow truck for just some scratches on ur bumper😂😂
He too rich lol
VOLVO !!! 💪👊💪👊💪😎👍
Song should be saying, crashing hit the Volvo right now I need a miracle hurry up now I need a miracle
What's the Dutch guy doing in Lithuania? One of the countries with the worst drivers and dangerous roads in Europe.
Habría que ver el Volvo debajo de los plásticos
Volvo for the win. The survival chances are incredibly much better in a Volvo.
@@iolivier well the toyota crumpled a bit too much though didn't it
TATS HOLAND IM DUTCH IM A VOLVO FAN MY MOM HAS A VOLVO XC90
It's not because Volvo is tough. There were some years ago when sedans, SUVs, pick-up's, and trucks did not align their bumper and this is a classic case. The result has been huge damage to the smaller cars when hitting bigger cars becaus their bumpers were too low so all the impact went directly to the hood and all the components within. Volvos are safe but doesn't mean they're so tough. In fact if they're xrumple zones are too tough, that would make them less safe.
Northernspear Im a Volvo driver. I do consider my Volvo tough. Its been broken but never left me stranded. I drove it 800 miles with an obvious leaking gas tank on a the donut with a shoestring timing belt. It cut off in the driveway as I pulled up. Its tough enough for me!!! Ive been in a few crashes over the years in Volvo's and walked away. Im not wrenching shit or crossing the Mojave or tractor pulling. I dont need a roll or to pull a 40ft camper up the mountain. Its a Volvo, not a pickup. So what if someone calls it "tough".
If crumple zone is soft like for Toyota then at low speed crash ex:40km/h, you will have a lot more greater comfort then in Volvo but at high speed crash ex:80km/h, that soft crumple zone will render useless and person in volvo will survive but but that in Toyota may not
''crashing, hit a wall'' (lyrics of the song) LOL
Тот момент, когда после дтп протереть пыль с бампера, сел и поехал.
Ahora que choque el Volvo al avensis por atrás a ver cómo le va 😅😅
That XC70 is totally able to drive away with a couple of pieces of tape!!!
For the whole comparison we need to see the same situation with volvo behind Toyota. Because the front part of all cars are made so that it just works like harmonica, like a big airbag.
volvo the only one that focuses on safety many more brands should do like volvo.. great volvo
Toyata paper
Crush zone !!! It is normal on the front of car !!!
Awesome, like a tank! Volvo for life 💪👍👍
volvo + ducktape = immortality
me + yo mom = doggy
Don't mess with a Volvo XD ure bettered hitting a brick wall
Araçların önü bilerek zayıf yapılır ameleler! Yaya yaşasın diye.
What remix is this??
Don't let me down.
dont get me qrong but the toyota is a total loss while the volvo is barley a scratch.
🙁🙁😢😢😭😭 RIP Toyota. Well at least Volvo is one of my favourite brands
Viking car!
China car! 😆
Mariusz Prokop - True! LOL!!!
Wow amazing the Toyota will go to the scrap and the Volvo nothing
Toyota: Dies in hospital
Volvo: Ouch that didnt hurt
Mechanic: just a few scratches
Tom the raton 77 I had an accident a long time with an Mitsubishi.
His car was totally wracked. And my Volvo have a scratch
my vw scirocco lost to a 1998 honda accord in the same way. the honda was only scratched and my front end was totalled. we are all under maximum braking when crashed.
some say...... these new volvos arent the same as old ones....... well thats bullshit 😂😂😂
Sempre questi filmati con volvo tamponare da dietro ....ma si sa che la macchina che urta una davanti nel suo senso di marcia si distrugge. Lo vediamo sulle strade di tutti i giorni.
Questi video non dicono niente.