Like North Omaha, a predominantly black poor area of town, as Warren Buffett wanted to honor the memory of his late wife who was a big PP supporter. So he funded PP to put in a lot of clinics up there.
And crazy how planned parenthood said that abortions were not the determining factor when keeping their offices open but all of a sudden when laws passed banning abortion they started packing up and closing clinics left and right.
Margaret Sanger didn't have the power of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Oliver Wendall Holmes and he was the one who OK'd the forced sterilization of Carrie Buck. If you are upset Sanger disliked "dysgenic types," you can get back at her by handing a generous amount to the next beggar and supporting a guaranteed annual income.
No one wants to admit they’ve been fooled anymore than they want to admit they were wrong. They get defensive. Even when it is clear they are wrong they will continue making justifications. Pride has a way of digging in instead of admitting weakness.
@@jaredwilson1938 Margaret Sanger started her crusade in large part to DECREASE abortion. She thought prevention was the way to stop abortions. As far as the public generally, in major ways we've gone the OPPOSITE of what Sanger wanted. She believed only married people should have a common domicile and married couples should have a permit for parenthood. Not only is parenthood not licensed but it no longer even has the bare minimum of marriage prior to it. In addition, we've gutted Sanger's basic vision by having people of opposite sex have common domiciles (living together, cohabiting, shacking up) without marriage. Her influence wasn't that powerful or neither cohabiting nor single mother would ever have become common.
He is the kind of person that votes based on his feelings instead of facts. He is the kind of person that would rather see the world burn down around him, himself included, if it means that he gets his way even when wrong.
Not necessarily. He could have actually agreed with Margret Sanger and the previously mentioned goals of the Planned Parenthood company. However, that's not the type of thing the average person has the courage to admit on a video which will likely be uploaded to the internet.
It might be the best example of cognitive dissonance I've ever seen because he did not even try to refute the fact she said it, and was literally just upset that he now had to face the fact she said it. I really hope he went home and looked it up.
@@jasondashney The whole problem is these people have that kind of personality that prevents them from looking things up. They are afraid of information because it exposes their ignorance and mistakes
one argument I've heard in the past - for sanger - was "oh well people could change" and "that was in the past" and still defending the rhetoric of planned parenthood.... however... you ask them about Trump's quotes from nearly 20 years ago its something along the lines of: "no he's always like that" or "he can't change" - so I guess when they want to support something, they're willing to say people and businesses are capable of change. when they don't like something... well...
I am a black man and for at least 15+ years I have physically specifically SHOWN black and white women that I know and even ones that I do not know all kinds of quotes and videos about Margaret Sanger. My life has been threatened on many occasions. I have been spit at, punched, kicked, cursed out and even had water thrown on me ALL by BW and WW after show them the thing things Margaret Sanger has said and did. I to this day will do everything in my power to make sure children are being born.
That last woman who said "each to their own" seems to be the exact type of person who Harriet Tubman was referring to when she said "...I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves."
That first guy was terrified not to tow the line. He knows the rules of "the party" and will do whatever he must to be loyal to "the party," which means never saying or even conceiving of something outside of their message. Reality or truth will be sacrificed on the alter of the party's will.
@@PatrcWU67-w3c Yeah, it’s a problem. I’m sure it’s a pretty big problem in China and N Korea and such, too. The whole world under siege and many individuals have ‘painted themselves into a corner’, so to speak. And you know what they say about cornered animals…
@@rm_con they think they will get laid by taking this stance... truth is his GF is fucking a dude that disagrees with her and has his own views. Thats why shes fucking him.
Five years ago I was having lunch with coworkers. We were talking about people we admired, and one woman said everyone should admire Margaret Sanger for Planned Parenthood. I looked at her and said, "Do you know that she advocated eugenics?" No one at the lunch table knew what eugenics meant, and the woman jumped up from her seat and screamed at me, "Whatever eugenics is you're lying! " She didn't even know the meaning or implications of the term, but she was defending Sanger. Another person looked up Sanger on his cellphone, and he began reading her bio. When it came to eugenics, and what the word meant, people at the table weren't too happy. I had bet them $50 that Sanger was an advocate for eugenics, and they told me I was a liar. Surprise!!!! I took my $50, went back to my desk for the afternoon, and hoped that they realized the racism that Sanger proposed all in the name of weeding out undesirable genes and populations. People need to know the truth about her, but this eugenics business is obscured by the abortion issue. Sanger----not the heroine most of America thinks her to be.
Margaret Sanger said racist things and she is not cancelled. The selective outrage is ridiculous. I’m glad Live Action are exposing the lies and standing for the Truth. I hope you all are safe, and thank you for the video. God bless.
There's a whole slew of liberal Sanger apologetics trying to whitewash her racist legacy, and PolitiFact even in the process once downplayed the KKK of all things. The fact still remains that Sanger appointed Klansmen and leading white supremacist Lothrop Stoddard, an influencer of Nazi eugenics and figurehead for today's "alt-right," as a board member to the American Birth Control League. Liberals freak out thinking Trump didn't distance himself from racists enough, but have no problem with Sanger literally speaking to the KKK and appointing a Klansman to a top elitist organization.
Sanger was an eugenicist. In one way, I'm glad they don't cancel her, otherwise we'd never know just how outrageous some of her comments were. God bless the pro-life lobby.
Yes, Margaret Sanger would be very pleased. Her mission has reached the success of 50% removal of new arrivals from the group she hated most. Better yet, those same people act like her organization are their friends. Margaret Sanger was a hardcore eugenisist.
They were baity. They were every bit as baity as when I give my students a problem that runs through a dozen steps and then the answer is the number in step one and everything else was pointless. Taking the bait teaches a lesson. (I teach a programming class; the example is a demonstration as to how a typo in one command results in unintended behavior that is different from a program simply crashing out)
@@catholicumbra Not simple enough. Being married doesn't automatically limit the number of times a female gets pregnant. Not every married woman wants to have kids at all.
Because of Sanger's work, the black population of America has remained at 13% since the 1960's. It has recently dropped to 12%. She would be so proud of her accomplishment.
Just think about it this way, the black population had the potential to be much larger than it is today. 30+ million larger. It's crazy when you think about things compounding over time. I remember reading I think in 2021 more black babies were aborted than born in NY.
@ssjwes572 Exactly right. With an average of 1 million abortions every year, 70% are bl@ck women. That approx. 700,000 babies of bl@ck women aborted yearly. The bl@ck race in Qmerica is gen0ciding itself.
She is literally where Hitler got the idea of eugenics from…. Her and her buddies in various political parties pushing this stuff. This is also when race hustling became a big thing. She’s on record saying that blacks had to introduce it to other blacks in order for it to stick. Same with white trash culture and any other undesirable group.
"I want Negroes to be free of enslavement but I have no intention of making voters or jurors out of them," said Abraham Lincoln. Are we to bring down his statues? Should we stop admiring him? The fact is that they are taking things Margaret Sanger said in the early 20th century to smear 21st century Planned Parenthood. Sanger was sympathetic to the problems of "Negro" women who had big families and were worn out by child-bearing.
Wrong. She was NOT a racist. She wanted to HELP black married ladies plan their families. She was also a product of her time period. She assumed ONLY married couples would have "a common domicile" because only bizarre people cohabited sans marriage in those days.
@@denisenoe3702 Many people in those days knew the KKK was an evil, racism organization and would have NEVER said those things that she wrote. Did you actually watch the video? If you're being sarcastic then I'm sorry I misunderstood. If not, what could she have possibly said to convince you that she's a racist?
@@JaneDoe-f9y Margaret Sanger wanted to HELP black married ladies plan their families. In general, in those days the only people who used contraceptives were the affluent. She wanted all to have access to it, especially those married women who might get worn out through incessant child-bearing. Her efforts to help this group were opposite of racist. Since the KKK was unfortunately an all-too-popular group, she also wanted to help KKK married women plan and space their families. If you wonder why I repeat "married," it's for the reason I said that only married couple usually had the same residence in those days.
Right? Like you can at least say she was evil and you learned something even if you still think the organization does good. He just couldn't handle a challenge to his world view. Weak. Reflective of my generation
Yeah, you could tell he realized he needed to reassess, but then doubled down out of pride in his own words. (SMH) Hope he went home and looked it up and began to truly think about it.
That was because no one was told about the TIME PERIOD. Sanger spoke to the women's branch of the KKK in the 1930s. Had time period been mentioned, NO ONE would have thought it was Trump since he wasn't born then!
They may be post-abortive and grieving their choice. This may have hit too close to home because of the matter of "person responsible for caring for others" not doing so or doing the opposite. Responsible person = health care provider or a parent.
Odd as it sounds, Sanger OPPOSED abortion! It was her belief that contraceptives would prevent unplanned pregnancies and therefore prevent abortions. The whole thing about Hitler is backwards. The Nazis closed all family planning clinics when they took power. They removed women from political offices. They promoted big families, giving special awards to women who had 4 or more children. Show me evidence that Sanger opposed women in political positions. Show me where she advocated for awards for women who had big families. Unless you have such evidence, she is the opposite of Hitler.
@@AlanRoehrich9651 These quotes were from the 1930s and one from the 1950s. The fact is that Sanger was reacted to certain problems within a certain context. As a nurse in the slums, she had seen very large families and children often neglected and/or abused.
“Oh no, I’m in an uncomfortable situation due to the fact that my worldview has been challenged, take your money back and now I will run away and try to forget this encounter.,”
The actual purpose of Margaret Sanger was to decrease abortions and unplanned pregnancies through contraception. Maybe she was wrong but that was her goal.
I get disgusted when I see some people in the video trying their best to divorce her quotes from the organization that she helped to create… willful blindness
@@trencesmall8704 She founded the American Birth Control League. She opposed the change of its name to Planned Parenthood. She didn't have complete control of it or it wouldn't have had the name change.
@@trencesmall8704 There is an organization notorious for rampant sexual abuse, usually of young boys. It openly discriminates against women. This organization enjoys tax-exempt status. Should it lose that status?
@denisenoe3702 In the early history of the race…. The weak died early or were killed. Today, however, civilization has brought sympathy, pity, tenderness and other lofty and worthy sentiments, which interfere with the law of natural selection. We are now in a state where our charities, our compensation acts, our pensions, hospitals and even our drainage and sanitary equipment all tend to keep alive the sickly and weak, who are allowed to propagate and in turn produce a race of degenerates. Another writing of sanger
“We have a moral philosophy here at The Party” and the moral philosophy at The Party is: Don’t let morals or philosophy get in the way of The Party.” Every Communist Ever
Communism and Religion Abolished - all religious and metaphysics is rejected. Engels and Lenin agreed that religion was a drug or “spiritual booze” and must be combated. To them, atheism put into practice meant a “forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.”
@@thrithgolden2748 Why did the Nazis shut down family planning clinics? Why did they award moms who had 4 or more kids? These weren't Margaret Sanger things at all.
When My wife and I was going to have our first child we went to Planned Parenthood for our first checkup. The first thing that the lady there said to us was "Do you want an abortion?" I now have 6 children, Grandchildren and a Great Grand Child!
And the keep lying about performing "mammograms" .... they don't operate them or have radiologists in their clinics. they refer people to get them....maybe...somewhere else..
Planned Parenthood is pro choice. But only if your choice is to abort your child. More honest to say they are pro-abortion than pro choice, but since when has honesty been a characteristic of such folks?
@@RighteousReverendDynamite they only deal in murdering children. They do not support the healthy development of the child, nor the pregnancy of the mother, at all. They'll lie and say they do, but they don't provide anything besides abortions and whatever else is needed to completely carry that out
@EndDimsSame reason they taught soldiers in ww2 the Japanese were really just some form of advanced ape in propoganda. It's far easier to take a life and commit abhorrent acts when you dont view it as human being.
Her purpose was to help married women of all class groups and races plan their pregnancies and have smaller families. This is why Hitler burned and banned her books. Hitler gave awards to women who had 4 or more children.
A dyed-in-the-wool liberal I used to know brushed information like this aside by saying, “Back then, a lot of people were eugenists” - as if that excused the whole thing.
That a lot of people were eugenicists back then is true and is why it was acceptable back then. It doesn't make it right but it explains their attitude. However, there is no excuse for someone to go on about racists and calling people Hitler and then supporting someone who supported the same thing that Hitler and Sanger supported. They admire the one and despise the other. They can't be that lacking in self awareness.
It is true that eugenics was more acceptable back then, but it makes you wonder what values the people who support organizations like Planned Parenthood today have. It is clearly not that every human life is precious.
@@Furienna "It is clearly not that every human life is precious." I think that this sentence gets to the heart of the issue. In their eyes, it would seem that if a life is unwanted, inconvenient or a burden, maybe it would be best to end it. They get to decide the criteria that determine what has to go. Invariably, that unwanted life doesn't seem to be their own life. With the unborn, they've figured out a way to be able to claim their own brand of virtue.
The history of Eugenics needs to be taught in every school. They forcibly sterilized people in mental hospitals, and wanted to wipe “undesirables” off the face of the earth. The terror didn’t end until the 1970s. AH read the Eugenics book and used it to kill millions
As a foreigner, I heard an honorable countrymen once say this, and he was right: Politics in America has really been reduced to blind fanaticism mostly. People prefer to support/vote for album stickers than for real policies. Even if they admit the person is bad they vote/support it nonetheless. The woman there literally said that "she's beneficial despite everything she says sounding absolutely terrible*. I just can't fathom this level of voluntary blindness, man
Well, as an American who doesn't vote for people i think are bad, you don't get the moral high ground because idiots scream the loudest. If you can't fathom this level of voluntary blindness, then may I suggest you're completely unfamiliar with history? Particularly outside America? American identity politics is disgusting, but your pathetic attempt at being superior, really is cringe. 😂
Where did “reproductive rights” come from? A lot of people mistakenly think Planned Parenthood or even Margaret Sanger coined the term “reproductive rights”. However, it was Soviet Russia who coined the term “reproductive rights”. In October 1920, with the “Decree on Women’s Healthcare,” Soviet Russia became the first government in Europe to legalize abortion on demand. The government launched a massive propaganda drive to “educate” women in their “reproductive rights.” Margaret Sanger did not coin this expression. She borrowed it from Soviet Russia, which she visited in 1935. Returning from this trip, Sanger wrote: “Russia today is the country of the liberated woman,” the delight of the “staunchest feminist”.
"gender transition" is another stupid euphemism. You can't change your gender. Even "sex change" was a euphemism but even that got a bad wrap so they made a euphemism for the euphemism
Its been the same people behind all of it. Unfortunately most get angry at the truth. They are talked about in a very old book that most don't believe is true Unfortunately. Rev 3:9
People really love the prisons that they have stumbled in. They see truth, but they love their cage and aren't willing to questions what they have been told.
People are so blind that they think murdering babies is good, and it's absolutely insane. They do what their father the devil does, it's as simple as that. I pray people repent of their sin and come to Jesus the Son of God as their Savior. God bless you all for the work you do on this channel.
For decades hospital births have cut umbilical cords; I'd recently heard this impedes oxytocin production and signals the mother's body through placental cortisol productions that she's lost her baby at birth. So many people are dead to their mother at birth, it's ghoulish. No cut umbilical
@@CatholicHousewife2017 humanity is a plague on this planet. the more people, the more saturated work force, lower wage, less resources, more need for agricultural and housing land. the best thing happening in first world countries is we have 1-2 kid average.
@@psier11 Margret Sanger was a racist who performed sterilization on young black women and said black people were like weeds that needed to be pulled out of the ground and cast into the fire
It's simple. It's an evil organization and it amazes me, that someone who would be disgusted by these quotations, will in the end agree when confronted with who has said it. It's kind of sad.
Many people continue to follow another organization, one infamous for sex scandals, usually about the abuses of males. Yet they don't leave the organization despite its negative reputation.
@@denisenoe3702 It is important to note, that there are groups where such scandals come to light and are being deemed "repugnant" and "abhorrent", such things leave everyone cold. Let's be fair, there is no group in the world free of scandals. But when a group is build on someone's subjective, sick and twisted view of the world... it is unrepairable and unredeemable.
@@GentleMenschClub Margaret Sanger's basic view of the world was that women should be able to choose when to have babies and how many to have. She believed children in smaller families would be more apt to get the resources, attention, and love necessary for good lives. THAT was her healthy and reasonable view of the world. I can't believe people who slam Planned Parenthood and then join a church notorious for its abuses of children (usually boys). Q: How do you get a priest to make love with a nun? A. Dress her up as an altar boy.
You want to get back at her? Be extra generous when a beggar approaches you. Work for a guaranteed annual income. Work for more women in politics and non-traditional fields generally. "Take that, Sanger!"
The second lady is right, you don't have to subscribe to every single idea in order to follow or use the work of someone. This should apply to both the left and the right.
maybe but if disproportionately a certain group is killing their babies and that's what this lunatic racist wanted....... seems like to this day it's still operating as planned. And no, not saying ban abortion but setting a limit (minus exceptions) seems viable as well as it being 100% not funded by any tax dollars(again minus exceptions if that person doesn't have insurance to cover it).when it's not life or death or about SA then it's a Personal elective surgery/procedure choice = personal money. Also, no more labeling it Reproductive Health which was a cute way to change it up since they (politicians and activists) know the word abortion isn't as soft on the ears or palatable. Reproductive Health is keeping the woman healthy before during and after her pregnancy and giving birth.... not choosing to end the life of the baby.
Watching this kid, in my head I was hearing the chorus from "Open Your Eyes" by Asia. "Open your eyes And see the world that stands before you now Open your eyes And see the world that stands in front of you"
We got a similar story here in Sweden with our equivalent to Margaret Sanger: Elise Ottesen-Jensen. She is mostly seen as an awesome pioneer today, but you will find that she too supported eugenics because it was popular in some circles back then.
Q: So.., why is it that when a fool is shown that the ideology they support is fundamentally wicked, they still will not change their mind? A: Because... they are a fool
Chances are it'll take some time. Quite often material needs some time to cook in someone's mind before it's ready to be eaten, so to speak. But yeah it is kinda sad they're not willing to even have a discussion about it. The 'leading figures' of their principles and beliefs were all completely messed up and awful human beings and yet they still choose to follow them. Heck the whole gender =/= sex thing was started by a pdf file who experimented with children and the prime example of his research... a boy forced to be a girl because as a baby something went horribly wrong, ended up taking his own life.
This is why reading is fundamental! People believe what they want instead of believing facts. I enjoyed this because it really does show how ignorant society can be and how much more praying needs to be done as well as education. Bless The Host who did The study.
I was pro abortion , I got convicted . We are so ignorant. And we abuse are body's are children and allow this travesty to continue because we don't know what respecting are body's are .and how to be loyal and stay in a marriage. The grass is not greener next door . We take care of are Dogg's better than are children . Thankyou this was very insightful .
It's been a while, but the last time I checked, PP was getting something like $2 million a year in tax payer's dollars and at the same time, PP was donating something like $2 million a year to the DNC.
These are the same people who are convinced that THEY wouldn't have supported slavery back in the day just because it was the "norm"...... Yes you would cupcake. You would fold like a cheap lawn chair.
Very True. In fact, slavery is still here in the form of human trafficking, and instead of heralding Sound of Freedom for calling attention to it, they vilify it.
Remember when democrats started defending illegal immigration because "someone has to do the work white people dont want to do or things like fruit will become more expensive". Now, where else have I heard of a scheme where foreigners are imported to do terrible work for basically nothing for the benefit of white people? Weird how the media scrubbed all those argumsnts from the national consciousness.
Planned Parenthood provides services for abortions, pregnancy prevention, vasectomies, female sterilisation, reversible contraceptions....but as far as I was able to find, no artificial inesemination or treatments to increase fertility or fascilitate pregnancies. Couple this with the fact that the founder was a staunch promoter of eugenics and that the vast majority of Planned Parenthood clinics are in/near black communities is quite telling as to their true believes and purpose.
It is. I summarized this issue briefly in a paper I wrote on common pool resources. Children may take parents out of the workforce for many years, and the return to the workforce is often difficult, as the parent who left the workforce is generally 'behind the times' as it is often said. The workplace is always evolving, new technology is being implemented, and it is now more vital than ever to remain in the workforce as long as you can, as the economy is rapidly declining. There is also the issue of the education of the youth. There are many children today who cannot count change or tell time on an analog clock. Our education system is pathetic, especially when compared to India, China, and Japan. The youth are not being taught how to think, but rather what to think, and no dissent is tolerated. The school systems are also unsafe, and with the rise of the 'transformers' as we'll call them, I think it is clear as day why things are becoming much worse. There is also the occasional instance of a lunatic firing a weapon in schools, which is an issue that the previous generations didn't have to deal with. The world is also overpopulated, and an equivalent amount of resources are now having to be distributed to a greater number of people. There are many problems with the welfare state and foreign aid, but that discussion would fill a book. Still, the resources will not last forever. While we will not immediately run out, it is unwise to table the matter indefinitely. I could continue, but I believe we have adequate evidence that the greatest human rights violation is not happening in a prison of some third world country. Rather, the greatest human rights violation is the creation of new life, and it's happening all across the globe. The fact that Planned Parenthood is working to negate these issues is commendable, and they are from my perspective, certainly a net benefit to society. Even so, I hope there is a day when their services are unnecessary, as humanity itself realizes that it's continuation is unethical.
@@josiahwright3751 You believe that killing innocent human beings, sometimes torturously as is the case with many late-term abortions, is necessary because, according to you, the world is overpopulated. I think you are wrong about population and find it pathetic that you think that homicide is a good means to solving problems. There should be a good means to a good end. Your end (the need to reduce population) is dubious and your means to it is horrible and unjust. You mentioned in your first paragraph "common pool resources." Are you familiar with Elinor Ostrom, who, though she might have denied the claim, effectively debunked the work of Garrett Hardin, who, for example, supported China's One-Child policy and who popularized the idea of the tragedy of the commons? Ostrom won a shared Nobel Prize in Economics in 2009 for her economic analysis of the commons. Hardin wound up apparently killing his wife and himself in 2003, you know, to save the planet.
@@St.IrenaeusOfLyons Homicide? No, certainly not. It's a blatant violation of human rights to prematurely deprive a living person of life, with the exception of a capital sentence following conviction for extremely serious crimes. If you allow homicide, you open pandora's box, potentially creating a precedent for the elimination of the elderly, psychologically and physically impaired, and many other types of people. This is certainly not the answer. Abortion does not deprive any living person of life, but is an approved medical procedure, comparable to removing a parasite from a host. I would argue that the ethical reasons are more important, and that overpopulation and economic responsibility both contribute to this broader issue. I would cite Garrett Hardin, in the Tragedy of the Commons where he makes the same argument that freedom to breed is intolerable because society is devoted to the welfare state. By preventing the creation of new life, we will reduce the surplus population, as it is generally those who are unable to financially support a child without governmental assistance who are seeking abortions. Garrett Hardin's philosophy is one that you will generally either completely agree with or fully reject. I fall into the former category, and while my paper goes into much greater detail as to why, I would argue that Mr. Hardin's death only reinforces what he stated in his writing: conscience is self eliminating, and it is because of this fact that the world will always be plagued with those who support the continuation of humanity, unless we are so fortunate as to see some world-ending phenomenon that eliminates humanity in its entirety. I would argue that Ostrom did not, in fact, negate the truth behind the tragedy of the commons, and while she did make some valid points relating to alternative methods of preserving common pool resources, it did not address the greater issue that Earth's natural resources are indeed finite. Given a large enough window of time and a large enough population, these resources will indeed run out. Maybe not this year, this decade, this century, or even this millennium, but who can truly say for certain? While it is possible to slow the decline, she was unable to do that which is impossible, and present a solution to the inevitable depletion of the world's resources. Fortunately, Garrett Hardin provided such a solution. Revoke the freedom to breed, and allow humanity to disappear from the surface of the planet. Allow the world to return to it's natural state, without the plague that is humanity. Just an additional note: I do not advocate for population reduction, defined as the premature termination of life. I do advocate for population control, defined as a hard limit on the number of people allowed to breed, which will steadily decrease, ideally eliminating humanity within three generations.
And more Planned Parenthood locations packed into black communities than other places.
Margaret Sanger would be happy she believed certain people should be sterilized or not allowed to have babies
Like North Omaha, a predominantly black poor area of town, as Warren Buffett wanted to honor the memory of his late wife who was a big PP supporter. So he funded PP to put in a lot of clinics up there.
Correct. Planned Parenthood is the incarnation of racism.
And crazy how planned parenthood said that abortions were not the determining factor when keeping their offices open but all of a sudden when laws passed banning abortion they started packing up and closing clinics left and right.
One of the reasons is the well off suburbanites who support Planned Parenthood, don't want one on their block.
It is easier to fool someone than convince them they've been fooled
Yep
Margaret Sanger didn't have the power of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Oliver Wendall Holmes and he was the one who OK'd the forced sterilization of Carrie Buck.
If you are upset Sanger disliked "dysgenic types," you can get back at her by handing a generous amount to the next beggar and supporting a guaranteed annual income.
No one wants to admit they’ve been fooled anymore than they want to admit they were wrong. They get defensive. Even when it is clear they are wrong they will continue making justifications. Pride has a way of digging in instead of admitting weakness.
@@jaredwilson1938 Margaret Sanger started her crusade in large part to DECREASE abortion. She thought prevention was the way to stop abortions. As far as the public generally, in major ways we've gone the OPPOSITE of what Sanger wanted. She believed only married people should have a common domicile and married couples should have a permit for parenthood. Not only is parenthood not licensed but it no longer even has the bare minimum of marriage prior to it. In addition, we've gutted Sanger's basic vision by having people of opposite sex have common domiciles (living together, cohabiting, shacking up) without marriage. Her influence wasn't that powerful or neither cohabiting nor single mother would ever have become common.
And theyre not receiving money while “She is”
The kid that gave the money back is the embodiment of why we can't have nice things. Refusing to learn is refusing one's freedom.
He is the kind of person that votes based on his feelings instead of facts. He is the kind of person that would rather see the world burn down around him, himself included, if it means that he gets his way even when wrong.
@@stevenalexander4721most voters vote based on feelings
@@thatdamncrow9197 And they are all idiots no matter what party they identify with.
Not necessarily. He could have actually agreed with Margret Sanger and the previously mentioned goals of the Planned Parenthood company. However, that's not the type of thing the average person has the courage to admit on a video which will likely be uploaded to the internet.
Holy shit, yes. The blatant denialism in the face of damning evidence.
The guy that gave the money back is just another example of a Liberal being presented with facts, but refusing to accept them.
It might be the best example of cognitive dissonance I've ever seen because he did not even try to refute the fact she said it, and was literally just upset that he now had to face the fact she said it. I really hope he went home and looked it up.
@@jasondashney The whole problem is these people have that kind of personality that prevents them from looking things up. They are afraid of information because it exposes their ignorance and mistakes
one argument I've heard in the past - for sanger - was "oh well people could change" and "that was in the past" and still defending the rhetoric of planned parenthood.... however... you ask them about Trump's quotes from nearly 20 years ago its something along the lines of: "no he's always like that" or "he can't change" - so I guess when they want to support something, they're willing to say people and businesses are capable of change.
when they don't like something... well...
That dude brain locked right in front of my eyes. Beayoootiful!!!
They don’t want accountability for their actions.
I am a black man and for at least 15+ years I have physically specifically SHOWN black and white women that I know and even ones that I do not know all kinds of quotes and videos about Margaret Sanger. My life has been threatened on many occasions. I have been spit at, punched, kicked, cursed out and even had water thrown on me ALL by BW and WW after show them the thing things Margaret Sanger has said and did. I to this day will do everything in my power to make sure children are being born.
I'm sorry you had to go through that man. People always parot what they're told but never actually look into it. God bless you if you believe brother
Guilt by association. They feel it in their conscience when you tear away the veil of lies
It looked like the working class men and the older Black lady were they only ones to see the empress "has no close"
You sound like a warrior for Truth, sir. Well done!
God Bless You Brother ❤
That last woman who said "each to their own" seems to be the exact type of person who Harriet Tubman was referring to when she said "...I could have freed a thousand more if only they knew they were slaves."
Yesssss. Such and underrated comment!!!!!!!
Goddamn
Wow
Well said!❤
Wow makes more sense now
Its incredible how they will believe everything bad about Trump but support people like her and dont care what she said
People are so easily manipulated.
Sickening
Public “schools”, media and pop culture train them to be unquestioning leftist zombies. Some people are just too dumb to overcome their programming.
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
So true
That first guy was terrified not to tow the line. He knows the rules of "the party" and will do whatever he must to be loyal to "the party," which means never saying or even conceiving of something outside of their message. Reality or truth will be sacrificed on the alter of the party's will.
And baphomet
Might have a job he doesn't want stripped away. Not a sympathy statement, but often true.
@@WinkLinkletter Which is what is wrong with this world, especially the left and the west.
@@PatrcWU67-w3c Yeah, it’s a problem. I’m sure it’s a pretty big problem in China and N Korea and such, too. The whole world under siege and many individuals have ‘painted themselves into a corner’, so to speak. And you know what they say about cornered animals…
@@WinkLinkletter One who understands
That young dude who was on the brink of tears because he felt baited needs to dive out of his comfort zone every now and then.
Probably raised by a single mum lmao
@@samhilton4173nah I’m talking about the white dude
Plenty of deadbeat white dads too
@@rm_con they think they will get laid by taking this stance... truth is his GF is fucking a dude that disagrees with her and has his own views. Thats why shes fucking him.
Even with receipts some won't consider taking a closer look. Mark Twain observed, " No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot".
Oh boy 🤔 there are a lot of idiots around ...
Five years ago I was having lunch with coworkers. We were talking about people we admired, and one woman said everyone should admire Margaret Sanger for Planned Parenthood. I looked at her and said, "Do you know that she advocated eugenics?" No one at the lunch table knew what eugenics meant, and the woman jumped up from her seat and screamed at me, "Whatever eugenics is you're lying! " She didn't even know the meaning or implications of the term, but she was defending Sanger. Another person looked up Sanger on his cellphone, and he began reading her bio. When it came to eugenics, and what the word meant, people at the table weren't too happy. I had bet them $50 that Sanger was an advocate for eugenics, and they told me I was a liar. Surprise!!!! I took my $50, went back to my desk for the afternoon, and hoped that they realized the racism that Sanger proposed all in the name of weeding out undesirable genes and populations. People need to know the truth about her, but this eugenics business is obscured by the abortion issue. Sanger----not the heroine most of America thinks her to be.
Abortion is the means of practicing eugenics. Sanger did not like blacks or poor people. She was despicable as is her legacy.
Bet she didn't learn a damn thing that day. But at least you got $50 to put up with her...
Lemme guess. You guys didn't have lunch after that.
Good for you sharing the truth about the horrors of abortion and racism.
Eugenics and abortion go hand in hand.
Rich kid handed money back because he was scared of stigma.
Old poor guy... he knows how poor people are treated.
I’m hopeful this experience makes him look into himself and some history..
@@Vmcgee234It won't. Narcissism isn't curable.
Margaret Sanger said racist things and she is not cancelled. The selective outrage is ridiculous. I’m glad Live Action are exposing the lies and standing for the Truth. I hope you all are safe, and thank you for the video. God bless.
There's a whole slew of liberal Sanger apologetics trying to whitewash her racist legacy, and PolitiFact even in the process once downplayed the KKK of all things. The fact still remains that Sanger appointed Klansmen and leading white supremacist Lothrop Stoddard, an influencer of Nazi eugenics and figurehead for today's "alt-right," as a board member to the American Birth Control League. Liberals freak out thinking Trump didn't distance himself from racists enough, but have no problem with Sanger literally speaking to the KKK and appointing a Klansman to a top elitist organization.
FACTS!
Margaret Sangar was based and redpilled
Hard to cancel a dead person lol
Sanger was an eugenicist. In one way, I'm glad they don't cancel her, otherwise we'd never know just how outrageous some of her comments were. God bless the pro-life lobby.
Yes, Margaret Sanger would be very pleased. Her mission has reached the success of 50% removal of new arrivals from the group she hated most. Better yet, those same people act like her organization are their friends. Margaret Sanger was a hardcore eugenisist.
@constitutionalrights827 Sanger is possibly the world's greatest marketing specialist.
The average black lady gives birth slightly more often than the average white lady in the US.
Instead of 30%, black Americans are 13% of population. Sanger is a racist hero.
@@gorilladisco9108 Their numbers have held steady. The average black lady has slightly MORE babies than the average white lady.
Yes, it really didn't matter what experiments she perform on her victims it just was so easy to use Black Communities across the US.
Tell me you're brainwashed without telling me you're brainwashed.
haha straight up!
dude said he felt the questions where "baity" yet calls killing children healthcare...
His programming caused him to react defensively.
He's not wrong. The questions were "baity", but even "baity" questions can be true. In fact, they tend to be true. Else, they woudn't be "baity".
I would have been like, “yeah they are, wanna answer the question?” Lol
he's an evil man, who hero is an evil person
They were baity. They were every bit as baity as when I give my students a problem that runs through a dozen steps and then the answer is the number in step one and everything else was pointless. Taking the bait teaches a lesson.
(I teach a programming class; the example is a demonstration as to how a typo in one command results in unintended behavior that is different from a program simply crashing out)
" My ONLY enemy is the Catholic Church.". M. Sanger 1938
Thanks for the info. I didn't know that.. Holy smokes 😲😯😯
Not surprised. Hilariously funny because they also have the solution. Don't have sex unless you're ready to settle down and marry, simple enough?
Also the Nazis who burned Sanger's books and closed family planning clinics.
@@catholicumbra Not simple enough. Being married doesn't automatically limit the number of times a female gets pregnant. Not every married woman wants to have kids at all.
What a nice Woman. She would get along with most dictators
“I support planned parenthood” & “Who is Margaret Sanger?” within 10 seconds is exactly what I would expect from a pro-abort
ruclips.net/video/HsrOPDdbTzM/видео.htmlsi=F1cVZVaj8X6d8gkd
People should ask why planned parenthood centers are mostly in black neighborhoods!
Because the well off suburbanites who support Planned Parenthood don't want them in theirs.
Minority neighborhoods. Both black and brown.
The very short answer is 'foetus farming'.
highest rate of single mothers. that's why
Well the reason is Margret’s “quotes”. A “national sterilization program” if you will.
The kid who gave the money back is a foolish child.
Brainwashed sheep.
And waved at the camera self-consciously…
He seemed scared of being noticed and cancelled by someone for just having the conversation.
Maybe a seed was planted to help him wise up.
@@joanneadamovich8114I sincerely doubt it
@@chrismiller3490 We can always hope.
Because of Sanger's work, the black population of America has remained at 13% since the 1960's. It has recently dropped to 12%. She would be so proud of her accomplishment.
Thank you, thats good information.
Just think about it this way, the black population had the potential to be much larger than it is today. 30+ million larger. It's crazy when you think about things compounding over time. I remember reading I think in 2021 more black babies were aborted than born in NY.
@ssjwes572
Exactly right.
With an average of 1 million abortions every year, 70% are bl@ck women.
That approx. 700,000 babies of bl@ck women aborted yearly.
The bl@ck race in Qmerica is gen0ciding itself.
if she isn't the definition of systemic racism, i don't know what is
She is literally where Hitler got the idea of eugenics from…. Her and her buddies in various political parties pushing this stuff. This is also when race hustling became a big thing. She’s on record saying that blacks had to introduce it to other blacks in order for it to stick. Same with white trash culture and any other undesirable group.
"I want Negroes to be free of enslavement but I have no intention of making voters or jurors out of them," said Abraham Lincoln. Are we to bring down his statues? Should we stop admiring him?
The fact is that they are taking things Margaret Sanger said in the early 20th century to smear 21st century Planned Parenthood. Sanger was sympathetic to the problems of "Negro" women who had big families and were worn out by child-bearing.
Wrong. She was NOT a racist. She wanted to HELP black married ladies plan their families. She was also a product of her time period. She assumed ONLY married couples would have "a common domicile" because only bizarre people cohabited sans marriage in those days.
@@denisenoe3702 Many people in those days knew the KKK was an evil, racism organization and would have NEVER said those things that she wrote. Did you actually watch the video?
If you're being sarcastic then I'm sorry I misunderstood.
If not, what could she have possibly said to convince you that she's a racist?
@@JaneDoe-f9y Margaret Sanger wanted to HELP black married ladies plan their families. In general, in those days the only people who used contraceptives were the affluent. She wanted all to have access to it, especially those married women who might get worn out through incessant child-bearing. Her efforts to help this group were opposite of racist. Since the KKK was unfortunately an all-too-popular group, she also wanted to help KKK married women plan and space their families.
If you wonder why I repeat "married," it's for the reason I said that only married couple usually had the same residence in those days.
The kid who gave the money back is textbook cognitive dissonance. His head almost exploded.
Right? Like you can at least say she was evil and you learned something even if you still think the organization does good. He just couldn't handle a challenge to his world view. Weak. Reflective of my generation
👍👍👍👍 Not a man, a baby who won’t look truth in the eye!!
Racism is overlooked when it comes to their beliefs.
Imagine that
Because, she was a racist on a power trip.
She wanted to exterminate blacks like weeds, her words.
😂
She was a demon
She was a person of the early 20th century, not of the 21st century. Her attitudes were formed by that environment.
@@denisenoe3702The more blatantly racist environment back then & why you couldn't just say that?
AT 2:22, The guy was mad at the other guy for showing the truth!
He sure got his panties in a twist.😊
2:14 This is why stupidity is out of control...for them, the end justifies the means...so they don't care when they are exposed to the facts.
'I'm going to give your money back, I actually love eugenics' some of these people are unbelievable...
Yeah, you could tell he realized he needed to reassess, but then doubled down out of pride in his own words. (SMH) Hope he went home and looked it up and began to truly think about it.
@@hollybolien2053these people are incapable of self reflection.
All of them.
The fact that some people heard the triple K part and thought of Donald..... these people...
So unninformed and with no desire to learn anything.
The media did a good job washing their brains against Donald Trump.
The media sold them that lie and they bought it. Critical thinking is dead.
That was because no one was told about the TIME PERIOD. Sanger spoke to the women's branch of the KKK in the 1930s. Had time period been mentioned, NO ONE would have thought it was Trump since he wasn't born then!
Absolute idiots.
I know right? But it is Boston after all.
We've been tricked, we've been backstabbed, and we've been quite possibly, bamboozled!
Wow just wow those two people STILL believe in planned parenthood. Wow. Sad. Willful participation in malicious actions.
exp a black person who's own people were targeted for genocide. Lord Jesus come soon......God bless you sister!
They may be post-abortive and grieving their choice. This may have hit too close to home because of the matter of "person responsible for caring for others" not doing so or doing the opposite. Responsible person = health care provider or a parent.
@@robmc120 Sanger didn't target anyone for genocide. She tried to help black ladies plan their families.
😂😂😂 planned parenthood is a service that provides contraception and abortion services which are essential for womens health you f**king idiot
I EXPECTED THAT FROM THE LGBTQ SOY WHITE BOY
That kid was more mad at the messenger than the murderer. So backwards
And he was so close too. So close.
Odd as it sounds, Sanger OPPOSED abortion! It was her belief that contraceptives would prevent unplanned pregnancies and therefore prevent abortions. The whole thing about Hitler is backwards. The Nazis closed all family planning clinics when they took power. They removed women from political offices. They promoted big families, giving special awards to women who had 4 or more children.
Show me evidence that Sanger opposed women in political positions. Show me where she advocated for awards for women who had big families. Unless you have such evidence, she is the opposite of Hitler.
You will find that telling people that they have been lied to will make them far more angry at you than they are at those who lied to them.
@@AlanRoehrich9651 These quotes were from the 1930s and one from the 1950s. The fact is that Sanger was reacted to certain problems within a certain context. As a nurse in the slums, she had seen very large families and children often neglected and/or abused.
@@denisenoe3702 Does that justify her extremist views??
Guy at 2:36 shows what cognitive dissonance really is
“Oh no, I’m in an uncomfortable situation due to the fact that my worldview has been challenged, take your money back and now I will run away and try to forget this encounter.,”
Hahahaha
his gf is fucking a guy she doesnt agree with that thinks for himself. Poor dude thought this would get him laid.
Plenty of people have bad quotes. The point is Planned Parenthood clearly founded to achieve the goals in those statements.
The actual purpose of Margaret Sanger was to decrease abortions and unplanned pregnancies through contraception. Maybe she was wrong but that was her goal.
I get disgusted when I see some people in the video trying their best to divorce her quotes from the organization that she helped to create… willful blindness
@@trencesmall8704 She founded the American Birth Control League. She opposed the change of its name to Planned Parenthood. She didn't have complete control of it or it wouldn't have had the name change.
@@trencesmall8704 There is an organization notorious for rampant sexual abuse, usually of young boys. It openly discriminates against women. This organization enjoys tax-exempt status. Should it lose that status?
@denisenoe3702 In the early history of the race…. The weak died early or were killed. Today, however, civilization has brought sympathy, pity, tenderness and other lofty and worthy sentiments, which interfere with the law of natural selection. We are now in a state where our charities, our compensation acts, our pensions, hospitals and even our drainage and sanitary equipment all tend to keep alive the sickly and weak, who are allowed to propagate and in turn produce a race of degenerates.
Another writing of sanger
THE LADY AT 3:50 GOT IT EXACTLY RIGHT!! GOLD STAR FOR HER!! ⭐️
“We have a moral philosophy here at The Party” and the moral philosophy at The Party is: Don’t let morals or philosophy get in the way of The Party.”
Every Communist Ever
Communism and Religion
Abolished - all religious and metaphysics is rejected. Engels and Lenin agreed that religion was a drug or “spiritual booze” and must be combated. To them, atheism put into practice meant a “forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.”
Hitler also made similar statements about the morality of his fellow Nazis.
What is yours is mine and what is mine is mine .Every Communist Ever. But if you read the Talmud you know where the concept originates.
@@JacobPaul-ix7oc communism k1lled over 150 million people.
@@psier11 cool it with the antisemitism goy
Bruh these people are so obedient. None of them would react this way to Hitler yet her views are perfectly in line with his, unbelievable
Sanger knew Hitler, and they shared their eugenics beliefs.
She inspired the Nazi's movement in Germany..
@@thrithgolden2748 Why did the Nazis shut down family planning clinics? Why did they award moms who had 4 or more kids? These weren't Margaret Sanger things at all.
@@sandykimbrough7170they got their ideas from each other
@@thrithgolden2748thank you, I was about to post the same thing, they didn’t just share the idea of eugenics, Hitler learned from Margaret Sanger
People will make excuses for the most horrendous things and call them self righteous.
When My wife and I was going to have our first child we went to Planned Parenthood for our first checkup. The first thing that the lady there said to us was "Do you want an abortion?" I now have 6 children, Grandchildren and a Great Grand Child!
And the keep lying about performing "mammograms" .... they don't operate them or have radiologists in their clinics. they refer people to get them....maybe...somewhere else..
@@RighteousReverendDynamite Same experience here in Colorado.
Planned Parenthood is pro choice. But only if your choice is to abort your child. More honest to say they are pro-abortion than pro choice, but since when has honesty been a characteristic of such folks?
That's ALL they do. They want to make you an appt for abortion asap.
@@RighteousReverendDynamite they only deal in murdering children. They do not support the healthy development of the child, nor the pregnancy of the mother, at all. They'll lie and say they do, but they don't provide anything besides abortions and whatever else is needed to completely carry that out
She also said the abortion clinica should be near black neighborhoods to prevent them from " breeding like flies".
And that's exactly where they are. And they offer vasectomy too
Sanger was despicable
Prove that . Quote the source.
Look up Sanger. It's all on Google for anyone wanting to truth.
it's not working and getting worse
The fact that people thought one of those was Trump isn’t speaking of his character, it is speaking of what people are told his character is.
I was far more concerned about the person who picked Reagan.
Cognitive dissonance exposing dogmatic thoughts. "Its My right to cull the unborn"
Exactly.
@EndDimsSame reason they taught soldiers in ww2 the Japanese were really just some form of advanced ape in propoganda.
It's far easier to take a life and commit abhorrent acts when you dont view it as human being.
How was this baited? I knew all those quotes were Margaret Sanger's. She never hid her purpose.
So did I, it's their ignorance that baited him.
These people are voting, that's a disturbing fact.
Except that one quote about hiding her purpose.
What do you think of this quote? Who do you think made it?
"only fit blacks should procreate to eradicate the race's heritage of moral iniquity."
Her purpose was to help married women of all class groups and races plan their pregnancies and have smaller families. This is why Hitler burned and banned her books. Hitler gave awards to women who had 4 or more children.
Most people don't want the truth.
A dyed-in-the-wool liberal I used to know brushed information like this aside by saying, “Back then, a lot of people were eugenists” - as if that excused the whole thing.
Oddly enough, I've never heard liberals say that about adolph hitler.
That a lot of people were eugenicists back then is true and is why it was acceptable back then. It doesn't make it right but it explains their attitude. However, there is no excuse for someone to go on about racists and calling people Hitler and then supporting someone who supported the same thing that Hitler and Sanger supported. They admire the one and despise the other. They can't be that lacking in self awareness.
One of Harvard's greatest presidents (1869-1910), Charles W. Eliot was a big eugenics though leader. He gave speeches on it all over the country.
It is true that eugenics was more acceptable back then, but it makes you wonder what values the people who support organizations like Planned Parenthood today have.
It is clearly not that every human life is precious.
@@Furienna
"It is clearly not that every human life is precious."
I think that this sentence gets to the heart of the issue. In their eyes, it would seem that if a life is unwanted, inconvenient or a burden, maybe it would be best to end it. They get to decide the criteria that determine what has to go. Invariably, that unwanted life doesn't seem to be their own life. With the unborn, they've figured out a way to be able to claim their own brand of virtue.
Great question! People need to understand the history of Planned Parenthood
The history of Eugenics needs to be taught in every school. They forcibly sterilized people in mental hospitals, and wanted to wipe “undesirables” off the face of the earth. The terror didn’t end until the 1970s. AH read the Eugenics book and used it to kill millions
Keep speaking truth! 🔊 Shout it from the rooftops and maybe some will come to know the truth and seek the Father before it's too late. 🙏
As a foreigner, I heard an honorable countrymen once say this, and he was right: Politics in America has really been reduced to blind fanaticism mostly. People prefer to support/vote for album stickers than for real policies. Even if they admit the person is bad they vote/support it nonetheless. The woman there literally said that "she's beneficial despite everything she says sounding absolutely terrible*. I just can't fathom this level of voluntary blindness, man
That's what decades worth of indoctrination by bad actors does. And it's why people need to learn more about history.
Well, as an American who doesn't vote for people i think are bad, you don't get the moral high ground because idiots scream the loudest.
If you can't fathom this level of voluntary blindness, then may I suggest you're completely unfamiliar with history? Particularly outside America?
American identity politics is disgusting, but your pathetic attempt at being superior, really is cringe. 😂
Where did “reproductive rights” come from?
A lot of people mistakenly think Planned Parenthood or even Margaret Sanger coined the term “reproductive rights”. However, it was Soviet Russia who coined the term “reproductive rights”. In October 1920, with the “Decree on Women’s Healthcare,” Soviet Russia became the first government in Europe to legalize abortion on demand. The government launched a massive propaganda drive to “educate” women in their “reproductive rights.” Margaret Sanger did not coin this expression. She borrowed it from Soviet Russia, which she visited in 1935. Returning from this trip, Sanger wrote: “Russia today is the country of the liberated woman,” the delight of the “staunchest feminist”.
J*wRussia and "margaret" Sanger, what could go wrong?
"gender transition" is another stupid euphemism. You can't change your gender. Even "sex change" was a euphemism but even that got a bad wrap so they made a euphemism for the euphemism
Its been the same people behind all of it. Unfortunately most get angry at the truth. They are talked about in a very old book that most don't believe is true Unfortunately. Rev 3:9
@@psier11what does j*wrussia mean? She wasn't jewish?
The term "feminist" was not coined until more than 20 years later... congrats on disproving your own bullshit.
She was one of Hitler's personal heros. He based his extermination policies affecting the disabled, mentally ill, and racial groups on her writings
There’s the future of many people in this country : even when facts are proven to them they chose to ignore the truth. To their peril.
People really love the prisons that they have stumbled in. They see truth, but they love their cage and aren't willing to questions what they have been told.
they CLING TO the bars on their cells.
"It's the truth - but I don't like this truth - so I'm outta here." smh
People are so blind that they think murdering babies is good, and it's absolutely insane. They do what their father the devil does, it's as simple as that. I pray people repent of their sin and come to Jesus the Son of God as their Savior. God bless you all for the work you do on this channel.
Better than having a country full of single mothers.
For decades hospital births have cut umbilical cords; I'd recently heard this impedes oxytocin production and signals the mother's body through placental cortisol productions that she's lost her baby at birth. So many people are dead to their mother at birth, it's ghoulish.
No cut umbilical
Sacrifice
Jesus said it himself. The devil is their father and their god . 😁
And yes , people are blind 👨🦯👩🦯🧑🦯and the blind lead the blind until ..........
“It’s easier to fool someone than convince them they’ve been fooled.” - Mark Twain
Wow. 😮 That’s disturbing.
“Planned Parenthood has a net benefit to the population” - Ma’am, they do the exact opposite.
They're a main contributor to the nation's declining birth rate.
@@CatholicHousewife2017 humanity is a plague on this planet. the more people, the more saturated work force, lower wage, less resources, more need for agricultural and housing land. the best thing happening in first world countries is we have 1-2 kid average.
@@andrewjones4115 you've been brainwashed by a false ideology embraced by Gates. You really ought to look at the facts.
@@andrewjones4115You've been fed the most attrocious of lies and think you're so hip.
@@fernandaabreu5625 how am I wrong? humanity is a plague on the earth
And in the end days they shall call evil good, and good evil
And Hillary Clinton is an admirer of Margret Sanger and has not been cancelled 😮
She won her award and did not give it back.
Those two didn't risk at all to have need of an abortion. Perhaps if they make a woman pregnant, being likely unoperated.
@@psier11 Margret Sanger was a racist who performed sterilization on young black women and said black people were like weeds that needed to be pulled out of the ground and cast into the fire
It's simple. It's an evil organization and it amazes me, that someone who would be disgusted by these quotations, will in the end agree when confronted with who has said it.
It's kind of sad.
It's the old "Rules for thee but not for me" standard. What makes it evil depends on whether I like the person. My rules.
Many people continue to follow another organization, one infamous for sex scandals, usually about the abuses of males. Yet they don't leave the organization despite its negative reputation.
@@denisenoe3702 It is important to note, that there are groups where such scandals come to light and are being deemed "repugnant" and "abhorrent", such things leave everyone cold. Let's be fair, there is no group in the world free of scandals. But when a group is build on someone's subjective, sick and twisted view of the world... it is unrepairable and unredeemable.
@@GentleMenschClub Margaret Sanger's basic view of the world was that women should be able to choose when to have babies and how many to have. She believed children in smaller families would be more apt to get the resources, attention, and love necessary for good lives. THAT was her healthy and reasonable view of the world.
I can't believe people who slam Planned Parenthood and then join a church notorious for its abuses of children (usually boys).
Q: How do you get a priest to make love with a nun?
A. Dress her up as an altar boy.
Like they are disgusted by Stalin and love communism. But in every way all they think is doublethink. All they speak is doublespeak. Fabian slaves.
It’s odd to me that people would think it’s odd that someone who’s goal is to delete as many babies as possible would say such things.
Good job. Expose these evil people. Lord Jesus Christ have mercy on us and deliver us from evil.
Amen 🙏
😐
That guy who gave the money back is the definition of a fool.
"A fool and his money are soon parted." And he gave the money back.
“NO NO NO NO YOU CAN’T SAY THAT BECAUSE YOU’LL BURN IN HELLFIRE”
Good for you! Thanks for putting out the Truth!!
It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled.
You want to get back at her? Be extra generous when a beggar approaches you. Work for a guaranteed annual income. Work for more women in politics and non-traditional fields generally. "Take that, Sanger!"
Just shows hpw evil she is 😭
Makes me so sad
This gentleman is refined and intelligent. Thank you for your education!
I am from Germany and I love these channels! Learned more about history than in school 😊
As soon as people realise it challenges their politics, they switch off and push the truth away. Shocking.
The second lady is right, you don't have to subscribe to every single idea in order to follow or use the work of someone. This should apply to both the left and the right.
maybe but if disproportionately a certain group is killing their babies and that's what this lunatic racist wanted....... seems like to this day it's still operating as planned. And no, not saying ban abortion but setting a limit (minus exceptions) seems viable as well as it being 100% not funded by any tax dollars(again minus exceptions if that person doesn't have insurance to cover it).when it's not life or death or about SA then it's a Personal elective surgery/procedure choice = personal money. Also, no more labeling it Reproductive Health which was a cute way to change it up since they (politicians and activists) know the word abortion isn't as soft on the ears or palatable. Reproductive Health is keeping the woman healthy before during and after her pregnancy and giving birth.... not choosing to end the life of the baby.
The kid is a perfect example of having confirmation bias. No amount of evidence will change his mind.
PP was founded with the help of Bill Gates Sr. Bill Jr. still funds them.
Two rotsch..s stooges
They are both staunch eugenics men so who is surprised?
I believe the father of Gates senior is of the same ilk too.
Wow. Eye opening responses. Shaking my head.
Wow. The brain washimg is real. When confronted with the truth, people still refuse to acknowledge it. Cognitive dissonance is a real problem.
Cancel bigotry, protect life!
Thank you. The truth will set us free.
Watching this kid, in my head I was hearing the chorus from "Open Your Eyes" by Asia.
"Open your eyes
And see the world that stands before you now
Open your eyes
And see the world that stands in front of you"
We got a similar story here in Sweden with our equivalent to Margaret Sanger: Elise Ottesen-Jensen.
She is mostly seen as an awesome pioneer today, but you will find that she too supported eugenics because it was popular in some circles back then.
“She probably is“ truer words were never spoken
Q: So.., why is it that when a fool is shown that the ideology they support is fundamentally wicked, they still will not change their mind?
A: Because... they are a fool
Chances are it'll take some time. Quite often material needs some time to cook in someone's mind before it's ready to be eaten, so to speak. But yeah it is kinda sad they're not willing to even have a discussion about it. The 'leading figures' of their principles and beliefs were all completely messed up and awful human beings and yet they still choose to follow them. Heck the whole gender =/= sex thing was started by a pdf file who experimented with children and the prime example of his research... a boy forced to be a girl because as a baby something went horribly wrong, ended up taking his own life.
The guy who gave the money back shows you the lengths dishonest people will go to not accept evidence that butts up against their religious beliefs.
This is why reading is fundamental! People believe what they want instead of believing facts. I enjoyed this because it really does show how ignorant society can be and how much more praying needs to be done as well as education. Bless The Host who did The study.
Thank You for the truth. I am from Europe and probably would never know about this.
ruclips.net/video/HsrOPDdbTzM/видео.htmlsi=F1cVZVaj8X6d8gkd
Obama and Hillary praised her! Do yo homework
“I hear your facts and what she said in her own books but I reject them!!” These people 🤦🏼♂️
Who remembers when Hillary PROUDLY proclaimed that she studied at the feet of, was greatly influenced by, and had great respect for Sanger?
A "net benefit for the population"??? Does she even KNOW PP at all??? They do LITERALLY the DIRECT OPPOSITE!
I was pro abortion , I got convicted . We are so ignorant. And we abuse are body's are children and allow this travesty to continue because we don't know what respecting are body's are .and how to be loyal and stay in a marriage. The grass is not greener next door . We take care of are Dogg's better than are children .
Thankyou this was very insightful .
I can’t believe our tax dollars still support PP.
It is money laundering for the evil democrat party.
It's been a while, but the last time I checked, PP was getting something like $2 million a year in tax payer's dollars and at the same time, PP was donating something like $2 million a year to the DNC.
😔 I wish our family would have known these things... 💔
I'm sorry. 😢 It is difficult to realize what's going on.
I appaul everything she said BUT I will support what she created. Crazy!!
This just proves to you that propaganda works.
I wish I could at least say I was surprised to hear she thought the government should dictate whether married couples would be allowed to have kids.
I respect the guy who gave his money back, I hope he reflects more and changes his mind.
These are the same people who are convinced that THEY wouldn't have supported slavery back in the day just because it was the "norm"......
Yes you would cupcake.
You would fold like a cheap lawn chair.
😂🤭
Very True. In fact, slavery is still here in the form of human trafficking, and instead of heralding Sound of Freedom for calling attention to it, they vilify it.
Yes they would too..
Remember when democrats started defending illegal immigration because "someone has to do the work white people dont want to do or things like fruit will become more expensive". Now, where else have I heard of a scheme where foreigners are imported to do terrible work for basically nothing for the benefit of white people? Weird how the media scrubbed all those argumsnts from the national consciousness.
I used to wonder what that saying meant until I sat in a cheap lawn chair.
I just figured cheap lawn chairs folded funny.
I'd rather be judged for the crimes of Hitler than the crimes of Margaret Sanger.
Planned Parenthood provides services for abortions, pregnancy prevention, vasectomies, female sterilisation, reversible contraceptions....but as far as I was able to find, no artificial inesemination or treatments to increase fertility or fascilitate pregnancies. Couple this with the fact that the founder was a staunch promoter of eugenics and that the vast majority of Planned Parenthood clinics are in/near black communities is quite telling as to their true believes and purpose.
Exactly they want population control and are targeting the black community
how you have the internet at your fingertips and believe any of this nonsense is beyond me
My idiot coworker thinks PP is great and MS is some sort of a hero. You can’t tell people anything; their minds are closed to the truth.
2:47 net benefit to the population? Maybe you should research more about PP…
When she said that I really went 🤨👀
Well, if their goal is to reduce the population,
mission accomplished.
It is. I summarized this issue briefly in a paper I wrote on common pool resources.
Children may take parents out of the workforce for many years, and the return to the workforce is often difficult, as the parent who left the workforce is generally 'behind the times' as it is often said. The workplace is always evolving, new technology is being implemented, and it is now more vital than ever to remain in the workforce as long as you can, as the economy is rapidly declining.
There is also the issue of the education of the youth. There are many children today who cannot count change or tell time on an analog clock. Our education system is pathetic, especially when compared to India, China, and Japan. The youth are not being taught how to think, but rather what to think, and no dissent is tolerated. The school systems are also unsafe, and with the rise of the 'transformers' as we'll call them, I think it is clear as day why things are becoming much worse. There is also the occasional instance of a lunatic firing a weapon in schools, which is an issue that the previous generations didn't have to deal with.
The world is also overpopulated, and an equivalent amount of resources are now having to be distributed to a greater number of people. There are many problems with the welfare state and foreign aid, but that discussion would fill a book. Still, the resources will not last forever. While we will not immediately run out, it is unwise to table the matter indefinitely.
I could continue, but I believe we have adequate evidence that the greatest human rights violation is not happening in a prison of some third world country. Rather, the greatest human rights violation is the creation of new life, and it's happening all across the globe. The fact that Planned Parenthood is working to negate these issues is commendable, and they are from my perspective, certainly a net benefit to society. Even so, I hope there is a day when their services are unnecessary, as humanity itself realizes that it's continuation is unethical.
@@josiahwright3751 You believe that killing innocent human beings, sometimes torturously as is the case with many late-term abortions, is necessary because, according to you, the world is overpopulated. I think you are wrong about population and find it pathetic that you think that homicide is a good means to solving problems. There should be a good means to a good end. Your end (the need to reduce population) is dubious and your means to it is horrible and unjust.
You mentioned in your first paragraph "common pool resources." Are you familiar with Elinor Ostrom, who, though she might have denied the claim, effectively debunked the work of Garrett Hardin, who, for example, supported China's One-Child policy and who popularized the idea of the tragedy of the commons? Ostrom won a shared Nobel Prize in Economics in 2009 for her economic analysis of the commons. Hardin wound up apparently killing his wife and himself in 2003, you know, to save the planet.
@@St.IrenaeusOfLyons Homicide? No, certainly not. It's a blatant violation of human rights to prematurely deprive a living person of life, with the exception of a capital sentence following conviction for extremely serious crimes. If you allow homicide, you open pandora's box, potentially creating a precedent for the elimination of the elderly, psychologically and physically impaired, and many other types of people. This is certainly not the answer.
Abortion does not deprive any living person of life, but is an approved medical procedure, comparable to removing a parasite from a host.
I would argue that the ethical reasons are more important, and that overpopulation and economic responsibility both contribute to this broader issue. I would cite Garrett Hardin, in the Tragedy of the Commons where he makes the same argument that freedom to breed is intolerable because society is devoted to the welfare state. By preventing the creation of new life, we will reduce the surplus population, as it is generally those who are unable to financially support a child without governmental assistance who are seeking abortions.
Garrett Hardin's philosophy is one that you will generally either completely agree with or fully reject. I fall into the former category, and while my paper goes into much greater detail as to why, I would argue that Mr. Hardin's death only reinforces what he stated in his writing: conscience is self eliminating, and it is because of this fact that the world will always be plagued with those who support the continuation of humanity, unless we are so fortunate as to see some world-ending phenomenon that eliminates humanity in its entirety.
I would argue that Ostrom did not, in fact, negate the truth behind the tragedy of the commons, and while she did make some valid points relating to alternative methods of preserving common pool resources, it did not address the greater issue that Earth's natural resources are indeed finite. Given a large enough window of time and a large enough population, these resources will indeed run out. Maybe not this year, this decade, this century, or even this millennium, but who can truly say for certain? While it is possible to slow the decline, she was unable to do that which is impossible, and present a solution to the inevitable depletion of the world's resources.
Fortunately, Garrett Hardin provided such a solution. Revoke the freedom to breed, and allow humanity to disappear from the surface of the planet. Allow the world to return to it's natural state, without the plague that is humanity.
Just an additional note: I do not advocate for population reduction, defined as the premature termination of life. I do advocate for population control, defined as a hard limit on the number of people allowed to breed, which will steadily decrease, ideally eliminating humanity within three generations.