Yup. You are right that they are exactly the same but completely different. When I was in college I understood capacitors but not inductors, so I asked the instructor about it. He said "Well. What do you think a capacitor is?" So I said "A rechargeable voltage source". So he said "Then an inductor is a rechargeable current source". It all made sense after that. (Except for calculus with complex numbers. Lol.) Cheers from Canada :-)
To learn electronics without learning math is the attempt of a fool. You are a VERY good teacher of these concepts. I'm commenting here 5 years after this video came out and I just discovered this channel.
hello everyone, i have a way to understand inductor reactance easily and intuitively(my take at least)! first, assume the AC case, where we measure signals and such. The inductor is replaced by its reactance 2*pi*f*L. The voltage across the inductor IS the backwards EMF. Now i know that the direction of the voltage drop is in the same one as the polarity of the signal, but since the EMF subtracts from the total voltage drop, its literally the same. Now, assume we have a signal passing through our inductor, with a frequency. We'll analyze in both high frequency and low frequency cases. Imagine the signal as being an infinite sum of dirac impulses (math concept i learnt in signal processing, its basically a square pulse with an infinitesmally small width and a height of 1, the height could be any unit, and in our case it's volts, and on the x axis we have time in seconds). For the duration of the dirac delta, the EMF decreases, because in that time the current is constant, and the EMF decreases gradually. As the frequency increases, the width of the dirac impulse decreases because the voltage changes more rapidly, not giving enough time for the EMF to decrease(in either direction that the signal swings), and thus the voltage across the inductor increases more and more (because the EMF decreases less and less) and at very high frequencies the voltage of the signal will be dropped entirely on the inductor, or the EMF will decrease extremely little after each change in voltage. In the low frequency case, the voltage drop across the inductor decreases because the impulses have a longer duration, in which the current is stable and the EMF has more time to decrease until the next impulse, making the voltage drop at the end of each impulse and right before we move onto the next, smaller. Anyways, that's my take at least. Simply Put, thanks so much for the video, without it I might not have figured out this stuff! I'll try figure out the capacitor next and I'll post it here too! If I am wrong in any way, please, correct me. And if you have any questions, please ask!
Love the straight forward explanations in your videos. Something about the way you explain them makes it seem like you're actually just trying to convey to me a concept over beers at the pub rather than in some heady, academic way. You know your stuff and you make it really interesting and easy to grasp! Thanks and keep it up!
Lent's law has nothing to do with back EMF, but rather it's related to forward/front EMF. Trying to stop or decrease the current (or magnetic field) of an inductor will cause forward/front EMF that will make sure the current (magnetic field) remains continues. back EMF is actually a result of Farady's law.
@@GalenMatson I too have only positive and no negative views to charge this way of teaching with, and that’s saying a lot since my capacitance for learning is well under spec
I was looking at a buck converter circuit and trying to figure out the role of the inductor and the capacitor right after the switch, but I found myself unable to tell what exactly the difference in function was of the inductor and a capacitor. So I looked for a video explaining the two. I do not understand 100% of what you just explained but things make so much more sense now. I am saving this and probably going to rewatch it over and over again, having it make more sense everytime I watch it. Very good video. Thank you for making it and taking the time to teach other people your wisdom.
I do not know why you do not have a Zillion subscribers. Your vid's are fantastic. Concise and so on topic. Thank you............you have become my goto in this fantastic field of engineering. Dave from "Downunder"
Symbol of inductance is L honoring physicist Heinrich Lenz. Your explanation about the magnetic field opossing changes in current... that is Lenz's law. :-)
Excellent video. And you're so right, I definitely had an easier time understanding capacitors as opposed to inductors, it was a pain for me to grasp inductors with the counter EMF and expanding and contracting magnetic fields, and polarity changes and this and that... ugh. Anyway, love your videos, this was a great refresher for me.
One way to think of capacitors in series (conceptually) is to add up the gaps within each one. Capacitance is inversely proportional to distance, therefore distance is inversely proportional to capacitance, so you add up the inverses of each capacitor to get the sum of the distances, and then take the inverse of the result to get the total capacitance. (Capacitance is also directly proportional to plate surface area, but it works out anyway. You could probably think of the surface area simply being distributed across the plates, but I'm not sure). While I did come up with the intuition for the formula myself, the actual conceptualization of adding distances is taken from one of Eugene Khutoryansky's videos (which I highly recommend). Parallel inductors can be thought of as being akin to resistors with values that decrease over time. Therefore, the formula for resistors in parallel also works in this context (adding up the currents flowing through each and then taking the inverse to get the effective inductance. Two identical inductors in parallel have the same current as a single inductor with half the inductance).
Such a video didn't really existed until now and a lot of people working with electronics don't know these. Well done! I just wish if you said something about saturation.
I saw this inductor current on the O'scope when I built a telegraph. Once I would hit the key, and release the Code Key, there would be a momentary Strong Spike "A Spark ' produced by the coil in the ' Clapper' I had to install a Diode to prevent burning of the points in the code key from this spike. It's a nice basic experiment with Coils and Back Current ...
Thanks for your amazing video. Just imagine voltage applied immediately while current needs time to flow. I understand it this way since college days 😅
@@simplyput2796 One of my instructors would discribe the inner workings of some chips as science because explaining how they worked was a little to hard to understand for some people.
@Simply Put. Just joined your excellent channel. Being able to explain this in laymen's terms like you do it is just pure genius. Most academics cannot teach but you certainly can. I am sure many EE grads do not have the depth of understanding that you have too. By the way Eugene Khutoryansky (a physics prof.) has a video that explains capacitors really well. Well worth a watch if you have not seen it yet. Basically as the electrons build up on one of the plates they repel the electrons on the opposite the plate thereby creating a current flow. Anyway, love your insights. Thank you.
The thoery of relativity connects the electric and magnetic field , actually magnetic field is also a moving electron but you are observing it in a different frame of refrence[watch varistasium video on it] , I liked your wreking ball analogy , also i like to think capacitor is like a mini water tank , if you increase the freuency of water going in and out from the same pipe ,then tank doesnt have time to fill ,it remains the same just like capacitor , and the wrecking ball is just the opposite , despite both wreking ball and mini water tank work on completely different concept , we can observe that both work are like reciprocal of each other , so thanks for the clarity on inductor ,I wish my school had someone like you to solve my doubts ,some one so practical and creative ,who can basically breakdown any problem into simple real life examples , Again thanks for the video ,It helped me a lot.🙏🙏
i just found your channel and this is the first video of yours I've watched, but I lost my fuckin shit when you turned your head to reveal your modded out headphones lol, I want a set, but I am not very skilled at audiophile level stuff like that. serious note though, You're a good teacher, I've had a hard time wrapping my bean around inductors, this made it click, thankyou!
very well put, how u compare physics is great, the wrecking ball hangs str8 down. pushed forward with a truck and held, the power that the truck needed to push the ball will be stored in the ball, when the ball is allowed to swing back, it will have a lot of inertia, same with magnetic field around primary of ignition coil, points open and the flux bilt up now collapses back into primary coil, that is why a condenser is across the points making a tank circuit, absorbing the back volts an keeping the points from burning out.
This was a great video. I've been watching lots of presentations about decoupling capacitors and seeing the reactance by frequency graphs and so on but this video gives me a much more intuitive model to digest. Many thanks!
Back in 2008 , there was a circuit I read about that added 100v to the existing circuit that was going forward as pulse on/off 40V DC about 6amps. There was no capacitor. The part added was a sealed 60cycles AC relay in vacuum with dual inductors 1.6Millihenry each, of .6ohm. Diode in front of 1st coil L in series with internal diode in between L coils then that 2nd coil L in series with another output diode. Did this arrangement just happen to be lucky and obtain the needed extra 100volts forward? Back EMF forced forward as flyback voltage put to use? I have many inductors to practice with and I need to get just voltage to superimpose on to circuit line. 100v or a miniature autotransformer.
wow. this is an excellent video. Great work! I like your humour and examples that you use to explain complex things. your videos motivate me to learn more.. you are patient enough to edit videos!
Awesome! That was really interesting and also made me laugh. I'm going to make a battery power supply for a tube amp and researching the topic. To understand wtf I'm doing and also get a clean DC.
Wow great job explaining ive tried to understand these things more than once but your video just helped me mind grasp the theory so much better. Thanks . this is the second video on this channel ive seen and. Theyre both great
When you said that inductors can be thought of as the reciprocal of capacitors it made me wonder if you could use inductors to filter signals like how capacitors are usually used.
YUP, The Leyden jar was the first capacitor a large bottle with tin foil on in and outside with a chain of brass to touch the inner layer. Ben Franklin got across a battery of Leyden jars that were well charged, said it was like stickin a hot branding iron into a keg of gunpowder.
Very interesting! So in this case.What exactly mean Henry's value and Farad value? Example,what means exactly 10 Henry's 🙄 And what exactly means for example 23mf Farad's? What exactly measure those values? Please 🙏
I think i got it, you are good, excellent explanationS; it sounds like you know more beyond that too, maybe A LOT more? And i have another question; your hair and beard, are they in series or in parallel,difficult to tell from here.. lol, thanks,man
My confusion with capacitors is that how do they discharge electrons if theres a barrier between them? Whats funny is a I found a book called electromagnetism and when i opned it on a random page it was about metal conducting, and they said that how electricity really flows is a question only quantum mechanics can answer. And maybe why the confusion and unhelpful anologies used when describing capacitors, and maybe there is something to Veritasium's claim that electricity doesnt actually flow through wires, but in the magneti field around the wire connection? or something like that. Maybe this would help alliveiate the problems in understanding inductors too? I dont know, im still on step 0 on electical components ie - I understqand wires carry electricit,y but see maybe thats the problem... not really understanding the basics like step 0 is why we're having trouble understanding everything else.
A wise man once told me I can harvest emf with a inductor and that'll feed a capacitor and with a diode I can send that charge to a cell to store the energy. Can you simplify this as you have with your hi pass low pass understanding. We live in a world with a constant 7hrz and the right shape inductor can be harmonically tuned to this?
This guy is how Lord of the Rings over time turns into Star Wars, we are witnessing Anikens teachers, teachers, teachers, teacher and so one x 10. I figured it all out, this is why we have to go back to the future a long long time ago and over the misty mountains deep in a galaxy far far away....😳 such a loney stranger in this time bomb town
Hello Simply put, I'vebeen messing with primary of microwave xformer modified to be an electro-magnet, there is a real bit of an arc when disconnected from a storage battery, is a condenser across the points of ignition coil a tank circuit? Very interesting, as I get it, less current thru and inductance, say field of traction motor, less current thru it, lass back voltage.
Yup. You are right that they are exactly the same but completely different. When I was in college I understood capacitors but not inductors, so I asked the instructor about it. He said "Well. What do you think a capacitor is?" So I said "A rechargeable voltage source". So he said "Then an inductor is a rechargeable current source". It all made sense after that. (Except for calculus with complex numbers. Lol.) Cheers from Canada :-)
You were born to teach people. I love how you speak. well done. more please
To learn electronics without learning math is the attempt of a fool. You are a VERY good teacher of these concepts. I'm commenting here 5 years after this video came out and I just discovered this channel.
Inductors are like a flywheel for current
hello everyone, i have a way to understand inductor reactance easily and intuitively(my take at least)! first, assume the AC case, where we measure signals and such. The inductor is replaced by its reactance 2*pi*f*L. The voltage across the inductor IS the backwards EMF. Now i know that the direction of the voltage drop is in the same one as the polarity of the signal, but since the EMF subtracts from the total voltage drop, its literally the same. Now, assume we have a signal passing through our inductor, with a frequency. We'll analyze in both high frequency and low frequency cases. Imagine the signal as being an infinite sum of dirac impulses (math concept i learnt in signal processing, its basically a square pulse with an infinitesmally small width and a height of 1, the height could be any unit, and in our case it's volts, and on the x axis we have time in seconds). For the duration of the dirac delta, the EMF decreases, because in that time the current is constant, and the EMF decreases gradually. As the frequency increases, the width of the dirac impulse decreases because the voltage changes more rapidly, not giving enough time for the EMF to decrease(in either direction that the signal swings), and thus the voltage across the inductor increases more and more (because the EMF decreases less and less) and at very high frequencies the voltage of the signal will be dropped entirely on the inductor, or the EMF will decrease extremely little after each change in voltage. In the low frequency case, the voltage drop across the inductor decreases because the impulses have a longer duration, in which the current is stable and the EMF has more time to decrease until the next impulse, making the voltage drop at the end of each impulse and right before we move onto the next, smaller. Anyways, that's my take at least. Simply Put, thanks so much for the video, without it I might not have figured out this stuff! I'll try figure out the capacitor next and I'll post it here too! If I am wrong in any way, please, correct me. And if you have any questions, please ask!
man that's a lot of text
when you used the fact that inductors don't use energy to oppose the electromagnetic force, made everything very clear. thank you very much sir!
Love the straight forward explanations in your videos. Something about the way you explain them makes it seem like you're actually just trying to convey to me a concept over beers at the pub rather than in some heady, academic way. You know your stuff and you make it really interesting and easy to grasp! Thanks and keep it up!
7:57 Chubby Emu, no, but massive Ewok, yes lol, sorry couldn't resist.
Lent's law has nothing to do with back EMF, but rather it's related to forward/front EMF. Trying to stop or decrease the current (or magnetic field) of an inductor will cause forward/front EMF that will make sure the current (magnetic field) remains continues. back EMF is actually a result of Farady's law.
I found this explanation to be within tolerances.
I found your reply "good enough"
I find your lack of precision disturbing (the stability of the circuit).
@@edinfific2576 Your desired precision is up to standard.
@@GalenMatson I too have only positive and no negative views to charge this way of teaching with, and that’s saying a lot since my capacitance for learning is well under spec
Wish you were still doing videos. Very clear.
I was looking at a buck converter circuit and trying to figure out the role of the inductor and the capacitor right after the switch, but I found myself unable to tell what exactly the difference in function was of the inductor and a capacitor. So I looked for a video explaining the two. I do not understand 100% of what you just explained but things make so much more sense now. I am saving this and probably going to rewatch it over and over again, having it make more sense everytime I watch it. Very good video. Thank you for making it and taking the time to teach other people your wisdom.
"and then open your umbrella"
welp, I'm dead now hahahahah
that made my day !!!! literally LoL
Where are you. Come back. I love your videos.
The Data poster makes me trust you 100%
I do not know why you do not have a Zillion subscribers. Your vid's are fantastic. Concise and so on topic. Thank you............you have become my goto in this fantastic field of engineering. Dave from "Downunder"
Symbol of inductance is L honoring physicist Heinrich Lenz.
Your explanation about the magnetic field opossing changes in current... that is Lenz's law. :-)
Because I'm learning on my own instead of at university, I'm kind of coming at everything backwards, so it's a little weird but fun still!
Your passion for education shines through, thanks for the great work. Very informative & very well illustrated.
Excellent video. And you're so right, I definitely had an easier time understanding capacitors as opposed to inductors, it was a pain for me to grasp inductors with the counter EMF and expanding and contracting magnetic fields, and polarity changes and this and that... ugh. Anyway, love your videos, this was a great refresher for me.
I am still learning and trying my best to grasp these, but thank you for your very informative and hilarious video!
Thanks for your presentation.
You have a gift for teaching.
Remain blessed.
Excellent explanation about the basics of capacitors and inductors mechanisms. Well done.
You have amazing skill at explaining complex concepts in a simple way. Thank you!
One way to think of capacitors in series (conceptually) is to add up the gaps within each one. Capacitance is inversely proportional to distance, therefore distance is inversely proportional to capacitance, so you add up the inverses of each capacitor to get the sum of the distances, and then take the inverse of the result to get the total capacitance. (Capacitance is also directly proportional to plate surface area, but it works out anyway. You could probably think of the surface area simply being distributed across the plates, but I'm not sure).
While I did come up with the intuition for the formula myself, the actual conceptualization of adding distances is taken from one of Eugene Khutoryansky's videos (which I highly recommend).
Parallel inductors can be thought of as being akin to resistors with values that decrease over time. Therefore, the formula for resistors in parallel also works in this context (adding up the currents flowing through each and then taking the inverse to get the effective inductance. Two identical inductors in parallel have the same current as a single inductor with half the inductance).
A bit late to the party here, but I like your videos! Very interesting and informative, and straight to the point! Exactly what I was looking for :)
Such a video didn't really existed until now and a lot of people working with electronics don't know these. Well done! I just wish if you said something about saturation.
you the man !
My three hour lecture into half hour lecture Thank you!!
I saw this inductor current on the O'scope when I built a telegraph.
Once I would hit the key, and release the Code Key, there would be a momentary Strong Spike "A Spark ' produced by the coil in the ' Clapper'
I had to install a Diode to prevent burning of the points in the code key from this spike.
It's a nice basic experiment with Coils and Back Current ...
Thanks for your amazing video. Just imagine voltage applied immediately while current needs time to flow. I understand it this way since college days 😅
lol, the energy has transferred into your face. Relating it to inertia was a great analogy. Thanks!
You have got the ball rolling, thanks dude
Dude, I just found out about you. You are the man.!!! love your explanations of things
this is fucking awesome men I have been searching for this on youtube for more than a year
Thanks, well said. Excellent analogy
One of the bests explanation I've ever see about both devices. Congrats and thanks
I just watched this video again. Awsome! One of my sons refured you as the Math Viking. All hail the Math Viking. Great vid my friend!
One of my viewers made this. Seems appropriate. i.imgur.com/24dgbgn.gif
@@simplyput2796 One of my instructors would discribe the inner workings of some chips as science because explaining how they worked was a little to hard to understand for some people.
Excellent teacher. Thank you for taking of your time to explain this to us.👍🏼
Genius man, just brilliant. Exactly what i needed. Thanks
please make a video of back e.m.f of the indutor and how things wrapped up with motor windings along with inductance
The L for inductance is for the voltage being out of phase by 90 degrees - represented as an 'L' formation of a node.
Feeling lucky to find this channel...simply put!
Learning and laughing at the same time when watching your videos. You're awesome :)
@Simply Put. Just joined your excellent channel. Being able to explain this in laymen's terms like you do it is just pure genius. Most academics cannot teach but you certainly can. I am sure many EE grads do not have the depth of understanding that you have too. By the way Eugene Khutoryansky (a physics prof.) has a video that explains capacitors really well. Well worth a watch if you have not seen it yet. Basically as the electrons build up on one of the plates they repel the electrons on the opposite the plate thereby creating a current flow. Anyway, love your insights. Thank you.
I laughed so hard when he made that joke open your umbrella.
Please asplain it
THAK FOR SHARING YOUR KNOWLEDGE !!! I AM SO HAPPY THAT I FOUND YOU !
Excellent explanation.
Thank you.
The thoery of relativity connects the electric and magnetic field , actually magnetic field is also a moving electron but you are observing it in a different frame of refrence[watch varistasium video on it] , I liked your wreking ball analogy , also i like to think capacitor is like a mini water tank , if you increase the freuency of water going in and out from the same pipe ,then tank doesnt have time to fill ,it remains the same just like capacitor , and the wrecking ball is just the opposite , despite both wreking ball and mini water tank work on completely different concept , we can observe that both work are like reciprocal of each other ,
so thanks for the clarity on inductor ,I wish my school had someone like you to solve my doubts ,some one so practical and creative ,who can basically breakdown any problem into simple real life examples , Again thanks for the video ,It helped me a lot.🙏🙏
It was excellent. I felt like sitting in front of u in class room
Excellent. Great teaching
i just found your channel and this is the first video of yours I've watched, but I lost my fuckin shit when you turned your head to reveal your modded out headphones lol, I want a set, but I am not very skilled at audiophile level stuff like that.
serious note though, You're a good teacher, I've had a hard time wrapping my bean around inductors, this made it click, thankyou!
Thank you so much for explaining all these so clear.
I am going to save this video right away.
Thank you so much for this video.... This is superb ... Please continue ... I hope U are doing well. Be happy ..may all Be happy
I was about to pull my hair out reading this book. Thank you you saved my long hair.
You are such a passionate teacher
great explanation,thank you.
You put it really simply. Well done!
very well put, how u compare physics is great, the wrecking ball hangs str8 down. pushed
forward with a truck and held, the power that the truck needed to push the ball will be
stored in the ball, when the ball is allowed to swing back, it will have a lot of inertia, same with
magnetic field around primary of ignition coil, points open and the flux bilt up now collapses
back into primary coil, that is why a condenser is across the points making a tank circuit,
absorbing the back volts an keeping the points from burning out.
This was a great video. I've been watching lots of presentations about decoupling capacitors and seeing the reactance by frequency graphs and so on but this video gives me a much more intuitive model to digest. Many thanks!
The freaking hole in your headphones made me laugh lol.
7:56 - A fellow chubbyemu viewer 🤪🤪😂😂
16:31 - To all the mathematicians, 1+e ^ (iπ)
Nice video as usual BTW 😇
Back in 2008 , there was a circuit I read about that added 100v to the existing circuit that was going forward as pulse on/off 40V DC about 6amps. There was no capacitor. The part added was a sealed 60cycles AC relay in vacuum with dual inductors 1.6Millihenry each, of .6ohm. Diode in front of 1st coil L in series with internal diode in between L coils then that 2nd coil L in series with another output diode. Did this arrangement just happen to be lucky and obtain the needed extra 100volts forward? Back EMF forced forward as flyback voltage put to use? I have many inductors to practice with and I need to get just voltage to superimpose on to circuit line. 100v or a miniature autotransformer.
wow. this is an excellent video. Great work! I like your humour and examples that you use to explain complex things. your videos motivate me to learn more.. you are patient enough to edit videos!
You're completely disregarding the Miley coefficient in the force of the wrecking ball :P
Underrated channel!
I think I get it. Great video. I think the hardest part is remembering all the terms
i understand some in theory but i am kin to know more in practice , thanks a lot!
Awesome! That was really interesting and also made me laugh. I'm going to make a battery power supply for a tube amp and researching the topic. To understand wtf I'm doing and also get a clean DC.
You,Sir, are amazing
Amazing! Thanks for the comparison - mind blown
amazing thanks......you explain things in the way my brain works!
Wow great job explaining ive tried to understand these things more than once but your video just helped me mind grasp the theory so much better. Thanks . this is the second video on this channel ive seen and. Theyre both great
Thanks and good on you I like the way you explain this stuff
When you said that inductors can be thought of as the reciprocal of capacitors it made me wonder if you could use inductors to filter signals like how capacitors are usually used.
YUP, The Leyden jar was the first capacitor a large bottle with tin foil on in and outside with a chain
of brass to touch the inner layer. Ben Franklin got across a battery of Leyden jars that were well
charged, said it was like stickin a hot branding iron into a keg of gunpowder.
Excellent explanation thank u
You got the gift. Cheers!
Very articulate, you are good
My man!
Definitely well explained! Thanks.
Dude! this is so good I feel guilty for getting it free.
Cool man, much appreciated.
Great video, thank you. Keep up the terrific work!
Very interesting!
So in this case.What exactly mean Henry's value and Farad value?
Example,what means exactly 10 Henry's 🙄
And what exactly means for example 23mf Farad's?
What exactly measure those values?
Please 🙏
I think i got it, you are good, excellent explanationS; it sounds like you know more beyond that too, maybe A LOT more?
And i have another question; your hair and beard, are they in series or in parallel,difficult to tell from here..
lol, thanks,man
Just as much its needed
wonderful lesson
The Wizard of the electron.
Brilliant!
My confusion with capacitors is that how do they discharge electrons if theres a barrier between them? Whats funny is a I found a book called electromagnetism and when i opned it on a random page it was about metal conducting, and they said that how electricity really flows is a question only quantum mechanics can answer. And maybe why the confusion and unhelpful anologies used when describing capacitors, and maybe there is something to Veritasium's claim that electricity doesnt actually flow through wires, but in the magneti field around the wire connection? or something like that. Maybe this would help alliveiate the problems in understanding inductors too? I dont know, im still on step 0 on electical components ie - I understqand wires carry electricit,y but see maybe thats the problem... not really understanding the basics like step 0 is why we're having trouble understanding everything else.
Funny and informative 😄 👍🏽
A wise man once told me I can harvest emf with a inductor and that'll feed a capacitor and with a diode I can send that charge to a cell to store the energy. Can you simplify this as you have with your hi pass low pass understanding. We live in a world with a constant 7hrz and the right shape inductor can be harmonically tuned to this?
This guy is how Lord of the Rings over time turns into Star Wars, we are witnessing Anikens teachers, teachers, teachers, teacher and so one x 10. I figured it all out, this is why we have to go back to the future a long long time ago and over the misty mountains deep in a galaxy far far away....😳 such a loney stranger in this time bomb town
You explain well.
Very simply put
Simple Genius 🖖👍🏽👍🏽
Hello Simply put, I'vebeen messing with primary of microwave xformer modified to be an
electro-magnet, there is a real bit of an arc when disconnected from a storage battery, is a
condenser across the points of ignition coil a tank circuit? Very interesting, as I get it, less
current thru and inductance, say field of traction motor, less current thru it, lass back voltage.
Damn man where did you get a life-sized poster of Commander Data. I'm sure I posted this comment before but still.
Good vid 👍 You got a new subscriber.
Should I be thinking of an inductor like a flywheel?
Dude! Great video. I hope you keep making them you're great. If you ever want contint ideas I have some.