Sinking A Navy Frigate With Missiles And Torpedoes - SINKEX Sinking Exercise

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 июл 2016
  • Aerial video of the sinking exercise (SINKEX) of the decommissioned USS Thach (FFG 43) during Rim of the Pacific 2016. The decommissioned ship is fired at with missiles and torpedoes until they sink.
    The Oliver Hazard Perry-class guided-missile frigate USS Thach was decommissioned after more than 29 years of naval service in year 2013.
    SINKEX is live fire training exercises conducted by the U.S. Navy to practice gunnery, torpedo accuracy, and missile drills on decommissioned Naval Warships. It gives the U.S. Navy the opportunity to practice on live targets, using real ammunition, and observing the results.
    AiirSource Military covers events and missions from the United States Armed Forces: Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Coast Guard.
    Visit our channel for more military videos:
    / aiirsource
    Like & share this video to show your support!
    Subscribe to stay updated:
    ruclips.net/user/subscription_c...
    Facebook: / aiirsource
    Google+: www.google.com/+AiirSource
    Twitter: / aiirsource
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 1 тыс.

  • @brians48now
    @brians48now 7 лет назад +277

    For anyone that didn't read the article on this.
    Thach absorbed an enormous amount of punishment, starting with a Harpoon missile launched by a South Korean submarine, the ROKS Lee Eokgi. Next, the Australian frigate HMAS Ballarat launched another Harpoon, and an Australian SH-60S helicopter shot it with a Hellfire missile. U.S. maritime patrol aircraft then hit it with Harpoon and Maverick missiles.
    But Thach wasn't done. The cruiser USS Princeton hit it with yet another Harpoon missile, and an American SH-60S Navy chopper hit it with more Hellfires. US Navy F/A-18 Hornets lobbed a 2,000 pound Mk. 84 bomb at it, and a US Air Force B-52 bomber dropped a GBU-12 Paveway laser guided 500 pound bomb on it. A U.S. Navy submarine got into the action, striking it with a Mk. 48 torpedo. Thach was hit with nearly five thousand pounds of high explosive, plus unspent rocket fuel and yet held out for nearly 12 hours. How did it survive so long? Good warship design, which has improved considerably since the days of World War II.

    • @ahmadsasuki2831
      @ahmadsasuki2831 7 лет назад +2

      Bad weapon, y should see Iran Noor missiles n hoot torpedoes

    • @magnus1679
      @magnus1679 7 лет назад +67

      I guess Ahmed is form Iran so you cant really blame him for thinking that Irans weapons are superior to any western designed weapons, since his goverment fills him with propaganda bullshit

    • @oogieboogie232
      @oogieboogie232 7 лет назад +11

      Information for the warheads of those weapons isn't publicly available. Assuming they have the same size warheads as the Chinese and Russian weapons they are based on then they would be likely be less powerful than the Mk. 48 and Harpoon. That says nothing about the guidance systems and and hit probability. The Hoot in particular has an advantage in raw speed. It is important to note that in this video the frigate is completely empty, meaning no combustibles and significantly less weight so it is sitting higher in the water. All compartments are likely sealed as well, so flooding will not spread easily.

    • @ahmadsasuki2831
      @ahmadsasuki2831 7 лет назад +2

      INS Hanit was the victim of Nour btw launched by hezbollah, also don't forget the new upgraded Gadhir antiship missile and Valfajr torpedo as well. All documented in RUclips. Accuracy n prob? come on Iran is not that stupid.

    • @realmaindrianpace
      @realmaindrianpace 7 лет назад +14

      Time to bring back the Shah.

  • @zahadaq
    @zahadaq 7 лет назад +25

    That boat took a pounding. Fair play to the Yank designers and those that built her. Outstanding.

    • @masquereseau5635
      @masquereseau5635 7 лет назад +2

      I wonder how many hits a gerald-ford carrier can take before sinking. Knowing that they upgraded it's armor and now use lots of divisions in it's hull to prevent the ship from sinking by torpedoes.

    • @erwinschmidt7265
      @erwinschmidt7265 7 лет назад +1

      Silly - Well, if it's hypersonic missile hit in jet fuel/ordinance section....that would be about....ah.....one???

    • @valf1733
      @valf1733 6 лет назад +3

      Erwin Schmidt Any ship, matter the country or make will most likely go down if it's hit in the ammo rack

  • @scotsmun7993
    @scotsmun7993 3 года назад +9

    USS Thach still strong enough to get our boys to safety after all that . Salute to all the US ship builders .

    • @Ch1n4Sailor
      @Ch1n4Sailor Год назад

      OMG… that was the Thatch????

  • @Combatsmithen
    @Combatsmithen 7 лет назад +53

    Aw man. Poor oliver hazard perry class, shoulda made it a museum ship, would love to tour a relatively modern naval vessel

    • @samsonstone500
      @samsonstone500 3 года назад +7

      Yeah that should always be the first thought when thinking about decommissioned ships imho

    • @ManagedPan1k
      @ManagedPan1k 3 года назад +6

      My father served that ship, it was sad to see it go

    • @no_-j4627
      @no_-j4627 3 года назад +3

      Why would they give back to the tax payer when they can blow it up for no reason with more tax dollars

    • @dylanaoyagi3
      @dylanaoyagi3 3 года назад +12

      @@no_-j4627 I don’t think you understand how valuable an exercise like this is, most sailors will never have the opportunity to put their training into action until they have to be called upon to go to war.

    • @no_-j4627
      @no_-j4627 3 года назад +4

      @@dylanaoyagi3 well considering I served my country in a MOS that ACTUALLY goes to war I think I know a fuck load more about valuable exercises then you do. You don’t need to sink a multi million dollar ship to play “combat”

  • @codboroks97
    @codboroks97 7 лет назад +40

    Look how it bends and flexes when it gets hit by the torpedoes. I've never seen anything like it. I can't imagine how powerful the torpedoes had to be to do that. Also, that ship is incredibly well built. I expected it to sink like a stone after all that damage it took, but it just kept on floating. I thought modern ships were weak and easy to sink, but it looks like they are as tough as battleships.

    • @HUNDLEYGUY95
      @HUNDLEYGUY95 6 лет назад +1

      Half a ton of of explosive more powerful than TNT detonated underwater will do that.

    • @bossdog1480
      @bossdog1480 4 года назад +3

      The SINKEX I was involved in had a welded up hulk with extra partitions welded in so that it WOULDN'T sink straight away. They examined it afterwards to get usefull information which improves building methods etc.

    • @raco5754
      @raco5754 3 дня назад

      That is because we put tons and tons of paint into that Ship!
      also remember we are the sponge!

  • @southerngent716
    @southerngent716 3 года назад +6

    I served aboard the USS Reid FFG-30 before it was sold to Turkey. Nice to see how sturdy they really were.

  • @HoneyBadger363
    @HoneyBadger363 7 лет назад +66

    That old girl went out with a bang, that's one tough ship. A proper way to send her to the waters of Valhalla.

    • @bBersZ
      @bBersZ 7 лет назад +22

      Shiny and chrome.

    • @Galova
      @Galova 7 лет назад

      blackjack and whores

    • @MrChickennugget360
      @MrChickennugget360 7 лет назад +6

      where she can battle with the likes of HMS Hood, Bismark, Scharnhorst, Oklahoma, Yorktown, Hornet, Helana, Samuel B. Roberts, Hoel, Johnston and hundreds of others forever being wadded upon by Merchant Ships until the Ragnarok

    • @jburt779
      @jburt779 3 года назад +1

      She was my home for 4 years

  • @ap7k533
    @ap7k533 7 лет назад +111

    Dam this ship is really well build

    • @matthewalford2762
      @matthewalford2762 7 лет назад +1

      +ZIG ZAG
      No. Ships are built much better.

    • @SkyWolfCirrus
      @SkyWolfCirrus 7 лет назад +4

      Ships are surprisingly resistant to damage, especially once they get to this size. They just have so many compartments and redundancies they just take too long to actually fill with water.

    • @MrChickennugget360
      @MrChickennugget360 7 лет назад +13

      Oliver Hazard Perry class Frigates are known for being really tough ships during the Gulf War one of our OHP Frigates hit a naval mine and shrugged it off, it would have sunk many other ships. USS Stark took to missile hits from an Iraqi Fighter in the 80's and went home under its own power. OHPs are no joke

    • @joem1256
      @joem1256 7 лет назад +1

      Yet we are not updating the Perry's with ESSM's even though there are designs for that and our allies are dong similar things with the OHP's we sold or gifted them. What would a Mk 48 ADCAP do to an LCS?

    • @MrChickennugget360
      @MrChickennugget360 7 лет назад +6

      Joe M
      yup. Perry's should at least be put in the Naval reserve in case we need solid escorts

  • @joenavy3136
    @joenavy3136 3 года назад +4

    Attached to FFG-55 for 4 years in late 80s. Cool to watch for training. Sad to watch because the Elrod is gone as well and was my home for 4 years.

    • @takeitfromme9134
      @takeitfromme9134 3 месяца назад

      USS Aubrey Fitch FFG-34 1985-1988 SC-02 Division Radio Central, these were great ships indeed!

  • @crucifyrobinhood
    @crucifyrobinhood 3 года назад +8

    Always my favorite ship to unrep. Watching them pull away launching from 13 knots to about 40 in as long as it takes to count it out. Just awesome.

  • @truethat6890
    @truethat6890 3 года назад +11

    Got a tour on this ship when I was a kid, and played it numerous times on Naval Warfare Simulation games. I always thought it was a damn good little ship. It brought a lot to the table. 30 SM-1, 4 Harpoon, 6 torpedoes, 2 helicopters, 76mm cannon, all steel construction, and a CWIS on the tail. Yep, a damn good little ship.

    • @KreigsMarine2
      @KreigsMarine2 Год назад +1

      FFG's have aluminum from the main deck up

    • @raco5754
      @raco5754 3 дня назад

      yeah 6 torps... those beauties

    • @raco5754
      @raco5754 3 дня назад

      yeah forgot the twin 25 mm guns. . grenade launchers... manned 16 mm ....

  • @emperorpalpatine6494
    @emperorpalpatine6494 7 лет назад +24

    USS Thach, it took 12 hours to sink you. May you rest in peace.

  • @keithcurtis6671
    @keithcurtis6671 7 лет назад +137

    Very misleading title as no actual "sinking" takes place. Should read "Decommissioned Navy ship hit by missiles and torpedoes and stays afloat."

    • @maxjones503
      @maxjones503 6 лет назад +15

      It did sink, just took about 12 hours. I'm sure you would be much less interested in that. This is just a concise view showing the testing of guided missiles and displaying their effectiveness against a frigate.

    • @spartanalex9006
      @spartanalex9006 4 года назад +16

      The OHPs are tough little ships. Tougher than they had any right to be.

    • @VagabondiOfficialTV
      @VagabondiOfficialTV 3 года назад +4

      Yes sir

    • @mike5162
      @mike5162 3 года назад +2

      Very disappointed

    • @paouvous
      @paouvous 3 года назад +3

      That was without sailors trying to keep it afloat. With them and good weather it would have made to port imho.

  • @tac540
    @tac540 7 лет назад +36

    Should of been named the USS Honeybadger

    • @floobertuber
      @floobertuber 7 лет назад +1

      They certainly did come at her, bro.

  • @electroncommerce
    @electroncommerce 7 лет назад +2

    Naval weapons manufacturers no doubt gained some very valuable data points from SINKEX.

    • @erwinschmidt7265
      @erwinschmidt7265 7 лет назад

      electron - dat a waste and dat a shame combo.........

  • @twisted5544
    @twisted5544 7 лет назад +17

    And to think all our ships are made this way or better, God Bless America baby.

    • @kpadmirer
      @kpadmirer 7 лет назад +1

      Maybe not the LCS.

    • @user-ir2oo4wo3g
      @user-ir2oo4wo3g 7 лет назад +2

      I hope all your torpedoes and missiles are the same shit. God bless the American gunsmiths

    • @Vroktar2009
      @Vroktar2009 7 лет назад

      The only reason we can read your dumb comment is because of an american company RUclips, being broadcast on the Internet Invented by the US. Get a clue jackass

  • @TheRayterry
    @TheRayterry 7 лет назад +6

    Scotty says: I can't give you anymore power Captain!

  • @user-nn7fg1um3m
    @user-nn7fg1um3m 2 года назад +8

    Вот он Русский военный корабль😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @randywiggins1248
    @randywiggins1248 4 месяца назад +1

    Nice. This video is Way Better than what was shown when they sunk USS Reeves CG 24..

  • @InfuriatedHawk
    @InfuriatedHawk 7 лет назад +1

    That thing put up one hell of a fight. Design and metallurgy are only getting better.

  • @geoben1810
    @geoben1810 3 года назад +6

    Now consider if she had been manned. Damage Control teams along with Hull Techs would be
    making repairs while
    other crew and Fire Control would be returning fire with the bridge crew maneuvering the ship. I would hope that would be the actual scenario in combat at sea. The NAVY does it all, and DOES IT ALL AT ONCE! 👍🏻🇺🇸

    • @ronniefarnsworth6465
      @ronniefarnsworth6465 2 года назад

      Yeah your right, but that TT hit would have probably injured 100+ sailors with broken bones, backs, fractures, head injuries and many deaths also !! The ship would be combat ineffective ! Semper Fi

  • @Wobogy
    @Wobogy 7 лет назад +3

    oh my god. I had no idea these things were so robust. You can see the whole superstructure twist like the tacoma narrows bridge and it just takes it like a champ. . . not to mention the widespread buckling in the stern

  • @kentuckyblugrass
    @kentuckyblugrass 3 года назад

    The first few seconds of the video showing the entire hull of the ship flexing as its hit is absolutely incredible. The fact that it didnt sink then is amazing.👊

  • @johnschultz2000
    @johnschultz2000 3 года назад +1

    Seriously glad I sped up that video..

  • @TyCetto
    @TyCetto 7 лет назад +38

    The last country to have a go at the poor ship was Italy... they sent in the human missile, captain Francesco Schettino... the ship was doomed...

    • @e.a.p
      @e.a.p 7 лет назад +7

      That's a brilliant joke dude, LOL

    • @rednovember2205
      @rednovember2205 7 лет назад +1

      LOL?!

    • @Jax8002
      @Jax8002 7 лет назад

      People died nastily.

    • @RandallFlaggNY
      @RandallFlaggNY 7 лет назад

      Was his girlfriend with him on the bridge? Did she push the firing button?

  • @kirkkirkland7244
    @kirkkirkland7244 2 года назад +3

    Incredible just how much damage they can take and stay perfectly afloat!!! My ship was also sunk like this and they never did see her go down because she lasted into the night!!
    USS BADGER FF 1071

    • @donaldaustin1275
      @donaldaustin1275 Год назад

      My first ship was the USS Connole (FF-1056). I do miss those days -

  • @codykelley6243
    @codykelley6243 4 года назад +2

    Thanks to my Uncle. I did a tiger cruise on this ship. From Hawaii to San Diego. It was an awesome experience.

  • @WildBillCox13
    @WildBillCox13 7 лет назад

    A valuable record. Thanks for posting.

  • @prime8167
    @prime8167 2 года назад +3

    Украинцы думали, что это русский военный корабль, а в итоге нет)

  • @Niggato420
    @Niggato420 7 лет назад +122

    Wtf. That ship is built really well. That's where our taxes go. And I'm happy about that.

    • @Niggato420
      @Niggato420 7 лет назад

      +DGAFSS Legend I know that.

    • @SAVikingSA
      @SAVikingSA 7 лет назад +4

      Modern warships are built incredibly stout, and it usually requires a torpedo or mine hit that snaps the keel for a ship to go down with any kind of speed.
      Punching holes in it and filling it with water will give it enough time to potentially snap YOUR keel.

    • @Niggato420
      @Niggato420 7 лет назад

      SAVikingSA But it took a surprisingly long time to even sink. And it took quite a few hits to do so

    • @able506
      @able506 7 лет назад +6

      Keep in mind they were essentially shooting at a floating tin can had that ship had ammunition and fuel on board which it obviously would in a real world combat situation those bombs and torpedo's absolutely would have hit either or both and sent the ship to the bottom exponentially quicker or made it an oil burning death trap.

    • @SAVikingSA
      @SAVikingSA 7 лет назад +1

      Captain Rhodes
      That's true to an extent, but there's been a ton of ships during WWII and after that have taken rather nasty hits and survived.

  • @damonbombino1237
    @damonbombino1237 2 года назад +1

    I looked up uss Ford sinkage and this was my home for a while. I got tears in my eyes, Tenacious stands true!ffg 54.

  • @ronniefarnsworth6465
    @ronniefarnsworth6465 2 года назад +1

    US Ship builders should be very proud !!!
    Building such strong ships !!!

  • @greypatch8855
    @greypatch8855 3 года назад +4

    I think we need to develop more powerful weapons, this older ship just walked it off like it were nothing

  • @Treetop64
    @Treetop64 7 лет назад +8

    Obviously, they went through the checklist for Condition Z before disembarking. Strong ship.

  • @takeitfromme9134
    @takeitfromme9134 3 месяца назад +1

    I was stationed on the USS Aubrey Fitch FFG-34 85-88, these ships are tough, just look at the USS Stark FFG-31 hit by two Exocet missiles (only one exploded), the ship did not sink, lost 37 sailors though. Stark was our sister ship. Only two of the Perry class frigates were scrapped after decommissioning, the Aubrey Fitch and the Stark, the rest were sold to foreign navies or sunk like the Thach.

  • @kaydeberg4536
    @kaydeberg4536 2 года назад

    That was great to watch. Thank you

  • @iskender8888
    @iskender8888 7 лет назад +3

    Великолепное судно!

  • @TheGrenadier97
    @TheGrenadier97 7 лет назад +5

    Much better than ending as razors and nails in some asiatic breaking ground.

  • @merlemorrison482
    @merlemorrison482 6 лет назад +2

    I worked on that ship when she was being built - sad sight for me!

  • @EleosGamoto
    @EleosGamoto 4 года назад +2

    Torpedoes carry much larger warheads than most missiles do, and thanks to the way in which the non-compressibility of water transmits blast waves, it means that hit-for-hit torpedoes can fuck up a surface vessel for harder than most conventional-tipped missiles could ever dream of.

  • @craig_ramjet990
    @craig_ramjet990 7 лет назад +89

    Ruined a perfectly good fishing boat. Darn Navy.

    • @bengarcia9612
      @bengarcia9612 7 лет назад +1

      Lel

    • @hevendor958
      @hevendor958 5 лет назад

      It's not a fishing boat it's a destroyer

    • @vts0361
      @vts0361 5 лет назад

      Noelle L I’m assuming you don’t know anything about this ship. It’s a frigate
      .

    • @speckkatze2724
      @speckkatze2724 4 года назад

      @Craig Thomas | Fishing Boat with Phalanx aa gun?

    • @hercholand
      @hercholand 3 года назад

      @@speckkatze2724 yes of course there are to many flying fish around

  • @sciotoslim8431
    @sciotoslim8431 7 лет назад +8

    Video games have lied to me. 2 shots at the most.

    • @asa0046
      @asa0046 3 года назад

      first time?

  • @theHentySkeptic
    @theHentySkeptic 2 года назад

    The flight deck ( or mound ) was amazing!

  • @UAL012
    @UAL012 8 месяцев назад

    Imagine the kind of damage a battleship would do to this ship. A 9 gun broadside would devastate a frigate.

  • @Shaherezade68
    @Shaherezade68 7 лет назад +8

    All that punishment, and at the end, still floating, nose bent in like a Disney Witch. The boys who built this stepchild need a commendation. Or at least a "Good on ya!"

    • @kirkchirrick
      @kirkchirrick Год назад

      I helped in the building of this ship. Remember when it went out on sea trials. Very clean ship

  • @Makrokosmos
    @Makrokosmos 7 лет назад +6

    The ship had no fuel and ammo aboard probably. if it had: boom. big time boom.

    • @beldenkevin
      @beldenkevin 7 лет назад

      Ship also wasn't armed with active anti-missile defense systems, anti-sub weapons and anti-air weapons which would have prevented most of those hits. It is always tit-for-tat on the what ifs.

    • @TheATCMatt
      @TheATCMatt 7 лет назад

      Boom, Big Badda Boom

  • @ElementofKindness
    @ElementofKindness 7 лет назад

    Not sure what impresses me more. The punch of those torpedoes, or how well the ship held up to the onslaught.

  • @tiigalilly5320
    @tiigalilly5320 3 года назад

    Awesome ship builders

  • @dennisjpoleyjr8713
    @dennisjpoleyjr8713 7 лет назад +3

    Still floating !

  • @oksanaok1642
    @oksanaok1642 7 лет назад +6

    отличное качество корабля , он непотопляем

    • @ZuMi_WaLt
      @ZuMi_WaLt 5 лет назад

      Этот фрегат был абсолютно пустым (без топлива, вооружения и какой либо взрывчатки или горючего на борту).

  • @Krammitftn
    @Krammitftn 7 лет назад +1

    I served on the Kauffman FFG-59 its almost painful to see one of her sisters abused this way. It is however, nice to know that she could take it.

  • @caseylimbert266
    @caseylimbert266 4 года назад

    Let's just never forget them mighty little Perry-class

  • @ShenghongZhang
    @ShenghongZhang 7 лет назад +10

    There's no fuel or ammo to help blow it up.

    • @vincelok894
      @vincelok894 7 лет назад +8

      Yes exactly. Let's face it, unless you hole the hull below the waterline, it's going to keep floating. But an actual live ship in combat, you'd have killed half the crew with those hits and the fuel and ammo would have caught fire and/or exploded, or more likely the ship's crew will have withdrawn the ship from the battle for repairs. This ship here is just a raft now, doesn't matter if the top of it is blown to pieces or a work of art.

    • @simpleisbetter4132
      @simpleisbetter4132 7 лет назад +4

      And all the hatches are opened (preventing air-lock buoyancy).

    • @Galova
      @Galova 7 лет назад

      yeah. let's look at what Granite missile does with whatever it hits then you feel the difference.

  • @foxtrot789
    @foxtrot789 7 лет назад +6

    There's a hundred damn videos of this event, some as long as 20 minutes and not a single video shows anything more than any of the two minute videos and ZERO videos actually show the thing sink.

  • @TexasMan77
    @TexasMan77 4 месяца назад +1

    Served on the John L Hall (FFG-32) Proud of how tough they were.

    • @takeitfromme9134
      @takeitfromme9134 3 месяца назад

      I know that ship! Desron 8, I was on the Aubrey Fitch FFG-34 85-88 Radio Central.

  • @ZionistSoldier
    @ZionistSoldier 4 года назад +1

    The Perry Class were damn tough ships

  • @1152121
    @1152121 7 лет назад +9

    Отличный пароход!!!

  • @Rychun79
    @Rychun79 7 лет назад +8

    ух, янки жгут))) интересно было бы глянуть что было бы, если б этот пароход отстреливался))))

    • @user-sh2iy6dn8y
      @user-sh2iy6dn8y 7 лет назад +4

      Просто после этого экипаж авианосца уволился бы, а пилоты самолетов оказались бы в психушке.

    • @Sovereign_Citizen_LEO
      @Sovereign_Citizen_LEO 7 лет назад

      HAhh Ha ha hA. The entire military would have been confined to a mental institution. LOL

    • @evancollins4458
      @evancollins4458 5 лет назад

      Russian salt fuels me

  • @KreigsMarine2
    @KreigsMarine2 Год назад

    I was stationed onboard the USS Rentz. There were many times both the Rentz and Thach were both moored at pier 4 San Diego.

  • @PukaHeadMan
    @PukaHeadMan 3 года назад +1

    Incredibly built ship!

  • @SergGaevsky
    @SergGaevsky 7 лет назад +7

    "СРАМОТА"(c)

  • @mikahakinen6106
    @mikahakinen6106 7 лет назад +29

    It should have been recycled, quality steel and toxic materials should not be at the bottom of the sea.

    • @JoeOvercoat
      @JoeOvercoat 7 лет назад +14

      they clean these ships out fairly well, and while that is some fine steel, the fish love it, too!

    • @telesniper2
      @telesniper2 7 лет назад +3

      hey! Those global steel prices won't prop themselves up! Have to create artificial scarcity somehow! So the steel industry's cronies in the pentagon make sure this scrap stays off the market..........PERMANENTLY. What a tragic waste of resources.

    • @jetvette66
      @jetvette66 7 лет назад +1

      "Aluminum".

    • @telesniper2
      @telesniper2 7 лет назад

      mallory1970 Yes I know it's low. That's why they are resorting to extreme measures like this. This ship was sunk very recently

    • @FirstToken
      @FirstToken 7 лет назад +2

      The skin of the superstructure from the weatherdeck up was AL, the hull and most stuff inside was steel. As someone who spent time on that particular ship, including bringing her to the fleet, I was saddened, however I understand the time for all things past, and she was one of the last of her breed. With the exception of the USS Constitution (laid down in 1794, and still on the lists today) the US Navy is without Frigates or Destroyer Escorts for the first time in history.

  • @highwaystar8310
    @highwaystar8310 7 лет назад

    Was a gorgeous looking ship.

  • @royalanania3306
    @royalanania3306 3 года назад

    Man !!!!! Those frigates are tough.
    Good made America 😊

  • @lomlomlom7488
    @lomlomlom7488 7 лет назад +4

    А потом он поднял флаг, протаранил авианосец, сбил антенной вертолёт и ушёл во Владивосток.

    • @user-sh2iy6dn8y
      @user-sh2iy6dn8y 7 лет назад +3

      И во всем оказался виноват Путин.

    • @user-nu6ev7qo9s
      @user-nu6ev7qo9s 7 лет назад +1

      В каюте запертый пьяный боцман орал "наверх вы товарищи все по местам , последний парад наступа-а-ет.
      Врагу не сдается наш гордый корабль, пощады никто не жела-а-ет

  • @elmocotton3078
    @elmocotton3078 7 лет назад +3

    Just give it to EXXON, they'll sink it...,

  • @igortheyakutian
    @igortheyakutian 3 года назад

    Wow, that ship can withstand hell of a beat

  • @lucagarau902
    @lucagarau902 3 года назад +1

    Good ship!!!

  • @72Fel
    @72Fel 7 лет назад +7

    у наших попросили бы "Шквал", одного хватило бы, ну на крайняк "Калибром"

    • @ZuMi_WaLt
      @ZuMi_WaLt 5 лет назад

      Прежде чем такое писать (такую ахинею), нужно хотя бы посмотреть на вес БЧ (тех и других). Этот фрегат был абсолютно пустым (без топлива, вооружения и какой-либо взрывчатки или горючего на борту). Одного бы не хватило. Цель состояла в том чтобы отработать по мишени несколькими видами вооружений (ибо не часто представляется возможность пострелять по реальному боевому кораблю).

    • @OnderTorgov
      @OnderTorgov 3 года назад

      @@ZuMi_WaLt И без команды и борьбы за живучесть, причём стоящий на месте а не в движении, и не огрызающийся из всего своего вооружения. Дурень, его бы вообще нереально было бы тогда уничтожить. Сам такую "ахинею" написал, эксперт диванный! Думай прежде чем написать, если есть чем думать!

    • @ZuMi_WaLt
      @ZuMi_WaLt 3 года назад

      @@OnderTorgov ещё один, упорышь....

    • @ZuMi_WaLt
      @ZuMi_WaLt 3 года назад

      @@OnderTorgov упоротое, какая борьба за живучесть, если взрывается боекомплект? Если половина (или большая часть) экипажа выведена из строя и/или убита? Каким образом движение бы спасло от управляемого самонаводящегося вооружения? Не, ну от какого-нибудь дерьма, вроде "Шквала", да - возможно. Но уж точно не от универсальных самонаводящихся (с возможностью повторной атаки, в случае потери цели) торпед Mark 48, с диапазоном в 40-50, а то и более км. От них спасения не жди...Для кого, "нереально"? Для лучшего в мире и в истории флота, не просто реально, а даже легко.

    • @OnderTorgov
      @OnderTorgov 3 года назад

      @@ZuMi_WaLt ruclips.net/video/lpGQqBSuCtA/видео.html

  • @minermike61
    @minermike61 7 лет назад +2

    I guess recycling didn't make more sense?

    • @pieman141
      @pieman141 7 лет назад +1

      Probably cheaper just to sink it and let it become an artifical reef.

    • @HoneyBadger363
      @HoneyBadger363 7 лет назад +1

      No, it gives the Navy a chance to test weapons on an actual warship.....hence the target practice. Our allies also got a chance to test their weapons too.

    • @minermike61
      @minermike61 7 лет назад

      +draco6543 Now that makes sense.

    • @franklentz5388
      @franklentz5388 7 лет назад

      True, the Navy has to pay a ship breaker to scrap a ship, not like the days when they were auctioned off to the highest bidder. The exception are the last few carriers that were scrapped, the breakers were paid one penny to dismantle them but the government still had to pay the decontamination of the structure.

  • @maxquad6846
    @maxquad6846 5 лет назад +2

    During SINKEX 2016, my first
    ship the USS Crommelin FFG37
    1989-92, was used for a target ship.
    Sailed a lot of miles on her.
    From Long Beach to the Gulf
    Thailand Shri Lanka, Philippines,
    Hong Kong to sailing thru
    the Panama Canal during
    deployment 90-91.
    Sad to watch the video.
    She was sunk in this same
    area.

    • @takeitfromme9134
      @takeitfromme9134 3 месяца назад

      I served aboard the USS Aubrey Fitch FFG-34 NS Mayport FL, also sailed many miles on that ship, Panama Canal, crossed the equator, Middle East Force 3-86, Suez Canal, Straits of Hormuz, Pakistan, also crossed the Arctic Circle (87), participated in the Space Shuttle Challenger SAROP January 86.

  • @danacowboy3325
    @danacowboy3325 3 года назад

    Man I think these people really did a good job on this ship

  • @Sergej127
    @Sergej127 7 лет назад +4

    Пригласили бы российский корабль на учения,он бы одной ракетой его утилизировал.)

    • @ZuMi_WaLt
      @ZuMi_WaLt 5 лет назад

      Этот фрегат (мишень) был абсолютно пустым (без топлива, вооружения и какой либо взрывчатки или горючего на борту). Одной ракетой его не утилизируешь. Зачем приглашать убогие российские корыта на учения лучших флотов мира ?)

  • @RockPKK
    @RockPKK 7 лет назад +3

    Made in US

    • @EngineVSEngine
      @EngineVSEngine 7 лет назад

      And everybody knows when saying "America" the USA is being referenced. There is no country or even a continent just called America.

    • @EngineVSEngine
      @EngineVSEngine 7 лет назад

      Ok, so where is there a country or continent just called "America"? "South America" does not equal "America", notice the word "South" at the beginning??? If people who live in Brazil are Brazilian what are people who live in the USA called? Come on you can do it..they are called "Americans"

    • @DougAdams
      @DougAdams 7 лет назад +4

      I have been all over the world, 21 countries and counting, every continent except Antarctica, and EVERYONE calls the US "America" and people from there "Americans".

    • @user-ry6dn1tu8b
      @user-ry6dn1tu8b 7 лет назад +1

      the rockets made in USA

  • @ricowingfield4992
    @ricowingfield4992 3 года назад

    I sailed with the Thach FFG-43, one tough old Frigate.

  • @protoengineer
    @protoengineer 7 лет назад

    Great ship survivability.

  • @Denmark1150
    @Denmark1150 7 лет назад +4

    А у нас в России подводные лодки сами тонут. Их даже бомбить не нужно.
    Она утонула(с)

    • @andrewoiler6714
      @andrewoiler6714 7 лет назад +1

      Потому, что в стране-тюрьме живут по понятиям. А в тюрьме анальная тема относится к вопросам иерархии и доминирования. Потому "дать в жопу Обаме" - это значит спросить:"Ты что, работаешь на Обаму?"

    • @Denmark1150
      @Denmark1150 7 лет назад +1

      Andrew Oiler Пелевин писал нечто подобное:
      "Большинство русских мужчин гомофобы из-за того, что в русском уме очень сильны метастазы криминального кодекса чести. Любой серьезный человек, чем бы он ни занимался, подсознательно примеривается к нарам и старается, чтобы в его послужном списке не было заметных нарушений тюремных табу, за которые придется расплачиваться задом. Поэтому жизнь русского мачо похожа на перманентный спиритический сеанс: пока тело купается в роскоши, душа мотает срок на зоне"

  • @kutamsterdam
    @kutamsterdam 7 лет назад +7

    To be honest .... i am not very impressed, multiple rockets and a very, very expensive torpedo and the poor defenceless bugger is stil aflote ..... back to the drawing board if you ask me......... LOL

    • @samspadexxx
      @samspadexxx 7 лет назад +6

      What normally kills warships is fire, this ship would have had all of it's fuel and lubricating oil removed, and a lot of the fixtures and fittings that might have added to the flames, I doubt there was much left aboard to burn..

    • @BrennanCallan
      @BrennanCallan 7 лет назад +2

      "Afloat," not "aflote."

    • @kutamsterdam
      @kutamsterdam 7 лет назад

      Yeah ... well you got my meaning ..right?!, english is not my native language so sometimes a little glitch sneaks in teacher..

    • @JoeOvercoat
      @JoeOvercoat 7 лет назад +1

      it appeared to just be a air-dropped torpedo, so just a baby, but still, yah. the weapons guys have to feel a bit defeated...after all, compared to capital ships, this ship is just a baby too!

    • @Sovereign_Citizen_LEO
      @Sovereign_Citizen_LEO 7 лет назад

      The whole idea was to keep it afloat as long as possible so the many nations that were involved in this live fire exercise could all get target practice on it.

  • @zamistro
    @zamistro 3 года назад

    A clip of it finally sinking would've been a nice touch, but still interesting.

  • @DavidSB50
    @DavidSB50 7 лет назад

    tuff little ship!

  • @ahmadsasuki2831
    @ahmadsasuki2831 7 лет назад +9

    Exocet n western torpedos is so weak

    • @ramairgto72
      @ramairgto72 7 лет назад +17

      US Ships are so strong .
      Fuck off Commie!

    • @user-fm2go3kt2u
      @user-fm2go3kt2u 7 лет назад +1

      +ramairgto72 or rockets so weak )) Yes, non-commie?

    • @steeldriver5338
      @steeldriver5338 7 лет назад +2

      They're trying to piss you off mate. Don't give them the satisfaction.

    • @Elving_
      @Elving_ 7 лет назад

      Dont you see the damage? xD

    • @cja9515
      @cja9515 7 лет назад

      The Used The Weakest They Had.

  • @antonz1977
    @antonz1977 7 лет назад +3

    Тупым не понять что они опозорились )

    • @ZuMi_WaLt
      @ZuMi_WaLt 5 лет назад

      Тупой ты, поскольку не можешь понять что фрегат был абсолютно пустым (без вооружения, топлива и какого либо горючего или взрывчатки на борту). К тому же это фрегат класса Оливер Перри, которые отличались хорошей живучестью и прочностью.

  • @ObamaTookMyCat
    @ObamaTookMyCat 7 лет назад

    the way that the ship flexed in the water after the blast really amplifies the weak stress points of the ship. Im willing to bet that at flank speed that flight deck had a nasty vibration.

  • @BigTonySF
    @BigTonySF 4 года назад

    FFG-7's were tough ships, I taught at the FFG-7 Land Based Test Site LM-2500 school at the Philly Shipyard, 4/82-8/83. Have never served on one, but did tours on SpruCans.

    • @tommullaney8714
      @tommullaney8714 4 года назад

      I went through GSM A And C school at Great Lakes in 81 went to Philly for firefighting school. Good times

  • @RaidonThe1
    @RaidonThe1 3 года назад

    I sailed with "Archie" USS Jack Williams (FFG-24) ... Wespac, Med, IO as an FC. An Honor to serve on her!

  • @FishBaitBlue
    @FishBaitBlue 2 года назад

    Damn that torpedo was brutal but that’s one tough old ship too

  • @Ricky40369
    @Ricky40369 7 лет назад

    Holy ship !

  • @robertsullivan4773
    @robertsullivan4773 3 года назад

    Worked on some of her weapons interfaces when I was at Sperry Systems management in the late 70s about once a week I drink my morning coffee out of my Oliver Hazard Perry mug I got after her commissioning. A good ship made for a poorly conceived mission. I understand many were sold to Turkey.

  • @rasro
    @rasro 3 года назад

    She held up well. Impressed.

  • @lastknightalive9586
    @lastknightalive9586 3 года назад +1

    Damn even after all those hits it's still floating

  • @johnmadsen37
    @johnmadsen37 3 года назад

    Impressive. Every meat inside is purée but that boat is tough.

  • @richardmattingly7000
    @richardmattingly7000 7 лет назад

    To HyperionGM, I agree to a degree, naval arms/fuel can cause the loss of a vessel like what occured to HMS Hood and USS Arizona at Pearl Harbor but its more rare than one might think. As HMS Barham capsized its aft magazine exploded as its ordinance broke loose and a similar fate awaited the Yamato as it exploded ot once but twice as she sank. Most main magazines are well below the waterline and its more often fire along with improper stowage of armaments which are a greater danger than enemy shells to warships.

  • @josephwhiskeybeale
    @josephwhiskeybeale Месяц назад +1

    Those OHPs were straight up tanks

  • @jamesbuck555
    @jamesbuck555 2 месяца назад

    Once SERVED... I am PROUD of Her!😊😊

  • @k2apache60
    @k2apache60 4 года назад +2

    Tough little ships the OHP class

  • @user-vu3yi5rt4t
    @user-vu3yi5rt4t 4 года назад

    Super ship

  • @martinpalomo8523
    @martinpalomo8523 3 года назад

    What I see how well made is that ship 🚢 well man made

  • @smytb
    @smytb 3 года назад

    RUclips is DESTROYING all of the good videos with WAY TO MANY ADS!!!
    STOP WITH THE ADS!!!

  • @billkern7457
    @billkern7457 3 года назад

    So, when does it sink? Looked pretty sturdy to me.

  • @AndresGonzalez-lf7lu
    @AndresGonzalez-lf7lu 3 года назад

    Thank you to the USA 🇺🇸 ship builders and repair personnel have who maintain US Naval ships in America.

    • @kirkchirrick
      @kirkchirrick Год назад

      I helped building this ship from launching in the water to completion to sea trials we were exhausted . Many navel supervision signed off each step of the build.? Sad to see her leave our shipyard for the last time.