If i havent said this before. I appreciate all you do for us. These subjects are not explained enough. Please , Please keep creating content like this. I share them with groups and on personal FB.
Thank you, I will! I do not say this often enough either and comments like these really do help creators out. It takes a lot of time and effort to put these together and if we only have trolls responding with crap, it makes it hard to do more. And let's face it, nobody LOVES more rules, so I get it. So make sure you comment your appreciation to your favorite creators, it is important and appreciated! 👽🛸
As an Airport Operations specialist who gets these questions quite often, this is a pretty good explanation and one I will be pointing people towards when they have questions. To expound on why ALL drones are Part 107, it is because that is the section of the FARs that houses all the rules for UAS under 55 lbs. This is the same as Part 121 (All scheduled airline operations), Part 91 (All non scheduled, non commercial, non military flight), Part 103 (all manned aircraft under a max empty weight of 254 lbs ), etc. Another Part of the FARs that frequently catches non aviation people is Part 77 which outlines obstruction to air navigation. The big catch is anything over 250 feet ANYWHERE in the US as well as obstacles lower than that on a slope towards the nearest runway (if you are within 4 miles of any public funded airport, you're best to check) then you can't exceed that height without an Obstruction Evaluation. Lots of times cranes will be erected to do some quick operation (like HVAC on a warehouse) and not go through the process, because the process takes weeks. So, you have a poor crane operator getting a visit from someone like me because their obstruction makes my airport unsafe and I have to close a runway or sometimes the full airport. The crane operator is not only fined by the FAA (which isn't cheap), but is civilly liable for all costs associated with their disruption. The rules can be a PITA for all involved, but almost all of them are there from a safety standpoint that was unfortunately learned the hard way. To anyone wanting to fly your drone l, use the apps out there to check the airspace. If you're in a congested area, go only as high as you need. When in doubt, call the Airport Operations at the nearest airport. Most of us are drone pilots and love to talk about them. We're happy to give info on when and where are the best places to fly, how to fly safely around our airspace,and work to get you waivers if your mission requires it. Contrary to belief,most of the people in the FAA and airport operations want to help make the sky open to all, we just have to work a lot of compromises to make sure everyone fits.
Part 77 rules on obstruction are for "objects" and not aircraft, I would assume, correct? And is it 200ft AGL within 3NM, and then 300ft, 400ft, 499ft agl for every NM distant, up to 5NM?
@@alacazaba it is for objects based on height. Moored balloons and such are tangentially related,but have their own specific rules. I don't want to get into a really long comment about the various imaginary surfaces over a runway. There are five of them (Primary, Approach, Transitional, Horizontal,and Conical) because each one could be its own topic. Basically, a decent rule of thumb is to assume a 20 to 1 slope from the edge of the runway. So go out 20 feet, up 1, another 20 and up another foot. The truth is there are various slopes depending on the length of the runway and additional, more restrictive slopes will be added for runways with instrument approaches. It gets pretty complicated at an airport like O Hare where you have multiple runways, extremely low visibility approaches,and they intersect. The FAA requires that any obstacle that may potentially violate these be evaluated. You can submit an OE/AAA (Obstruction Evaluation/ Airport Airspace Analysis) request for free online and usually get a report back in a couple of weeks. It will basically come back with how the obstacle effects the National Airspace System. To be VERY clear, it doesn't prohibit the object, it just outlines the impact and what must change in the NAS to accommodate it. It is the entities on the ground that can regulate it based on the impact to their airport. This is why cities don't get to build skyscrapers off a runway. Because the FAA says the runway is unsafe for use and their airport is then impacted. It is cheaper to zone the buildings then move the runway. So, moral of the story is if you are within about 4 miles (straight line) of a public use runway and need to do something taller than your roof line, do a quick Google Earth measurement to the nearest point of the runway and divide that number by 20. That is how tall you can go before the FAA cares. If the number is 250 or higher, the FAA will always care.
Hey Parker I have a question when someone gets pre-authorization to fly their drone and class D airspace does the control tower get notified that there is drones in the vicinity and are man pilots notified or have equipment on their airplanes that let them know that there is drones nearby?
@@jay-dt3zq , So the authorization will be sent to Air Traffic Manager and the Airport Manager and will outline the time of the operation, location, and max permissable altitude. It will also detail if any operational changes need to occur at airport for safety (no instrument operation from a runway, closed runway, opposite traffic pattern, etc.). There will always be a note that operation of the drone still requires ATC approval and the ATC facility and Airport Operations must be called before liftoff and once the operation is complete. This is the part that catches most drone pilots. Just because you have the DroneZone paper doesn't mean you have carte blanche to fly. LAANC authorizations don't usually have that contact requirement, but LAANC is more tightly restricted on altitudes. There is nothing the drone sends out that a manned aircraft can detect. Aircraft have ADS-B In/Out for manned flights, but to minimize congestion, drones are only allowed to receive this info (ADS-B In), not transmit (ADS-B Out). If UAS operations are occuring within the Class D the best practices is for the Airport Authority to issue a Notice to Air Missions (NOTAM), which alerts air raft operators in the area. The ATC will then update their Automated Terminal Information Service (ATIS) to reflect the NOTAM. Authorization at a Class D isn't too difficult for a Part 107 that is willing to work around the operational tempo. Class C is harder, but possible as long as not in an approach corridor. Class B is exceedingly difficult and practically never gets authorized off the runway ends.
I live on 93 acres situated outside any flight restriction areas. I’ll fly my drone recreationally and whenever I choose, and “the man” is not coming onto my private property to check anything.
except the man has every right to enter with probable cause. but i feel ya. sadly i think that my time as a drone pilot is at an end. i havent flown in 7 Mo.
Not without a warrant, their not. The FAA has not jurisdiction on private property. Pursuant to the 9th and 10th Amendments, US Constitution, the federal government cannot assume powers not specifically granted to it by the Constitution. There has never been a constitutional amendment establishing the FAA in the US, until that happens, it is my position that the FAA has no constitutional authority over the actions of any private citizen. Congress cannot grant the FAA power, that Congress itself does not have under the US Constitution. Assuming that the FAA is constitutional, it does not have the authority regulate the privately owned air space that reaches the enveloping atmosphere of a persons real property, anymore than having the authority to regulate the airspace within ones home. The US Supreme Court has ruled, a landowner owns as much of the space above the ground as he can occupy or use in connection with the land. Flying a quadcopter around and above privately own trees, buildings, animals, or any other object owned, controlled, and connected to the property, is clearly an activity that is done in direct connection with the use of the land. Privately owned airspace is as much a property right as anything else attached to the property. The government cannot take possession of privately owned airspace and tell a landowner how privately owned airspace can, or cannot be used, without due process of law. The United States Supreme Court ruled, “We have said that the airspace is a public highway. Yet it is obvious that, if the landowner is to have full enjoyment of the land, he must have exclusive control of the immediate reaches of the enveloping atmosphere. . . . . The landowner owns at least as much of the space above the ground as they can occupy or use in connection with the land.” States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 (1946) If you don't stand up for your constitutionally protected rights, you don't have them.
@@0utcast On private property, the FAA cannot prove probable cause by simply observing a drone in the air. Without knowing who is flying the drone, how much it weighs, etc., there is no probable cause for anything, only speculation. Without the drone operator volunteering information related to the drone, the FAA can only assume that the drone in question is under 250 grams. Since a citizen has no obligation to witness against themselves, the FAA must make their own independent investigation on the matter, and cannot enter upon private property without a 4th Amendment warrant. Fly safe, fly free!
I still hear from all of these videos that, when asked, "the intent of my flight is solely for recreation and I had line of sight" would be hard to disprove in court, if it ever got that far.
Keep in mind it's easy for someone on a video to tell others to be cavalier about the rules but when you're in front of the judge and the FAA says you were not following the rules and here's why, the guys in the video won't be there to back you up, just sayin. In your other comment you mentioned you don't have a clue about CBOs. That in itself is against the rules and means the FAA (and the law) will judge your flights against part 107 rules and will add this to what will be a large list of 107 rules not followed, doesn't matter if they can't prove one beyond a reasonable doubt. The FAA isn't out to get people, I've actually found most to be really decent and they love the hobby. If you make some effort to become knowledgeable and follow the rules at all you likely won't have an issue even if something goes wrong.
You realize you can right now, get into an ultralight aircraft that weighs 254 pounds, it poses a far more significant threat to manned aircraft and not have to do anything the things FAA is requiring for 251 gram drone? How is that fair? This is why I mostly ignore FAA I use LAANC and stay under 400 feet, I use LAANC to avoid restricted airspace beyond that the FAA isn't going to over regulate my hobby or ruin my fun. I'd be happy to school FAA in SCOTUS about my rights they are violating.
as for cbo's, pilot institute has an article about WHICH cbo to choose for rules to follow....you don't need to be a member to follow the cbo's, btw. The 3 CBOs noted: Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA), First Person View (FPV) Freedom Coalition, Flite Test Community Association (FTCA) ----- and these rules apply whether you fly under 250g up to 55lb. If you are 107, when flying rec you will need to cite a CBO.
Did you print it out, or did they send it to you via email? [Contact them?] /// Also, it seems strange that, I do not see a gov website data Website, that would allow verification of license (TRUST), via name, email and or License number of the given, (TRUST LICENSE), that has been issued. Would be nice to be able to verify you have a valid TRUST License, and did not have a, (maybe not good one done), does anyone have an answer on this????? - Should not the Government have a data base on this, so that you and or authorities may check? - PLEASE COMMENT, or is this a xyz ........ ? /// And, NO NO NO, blah blah blah, just take again??? - How would a ........ verify your TRUST license in the field?
Good review of the rules. Did you know, that up in Canada, you do not need to register sub 250g drones. And you can fly them FPV sans spotter, or BVLOS. And … here’s the kicker … nothing … yeah … nothing. No harm has befallen a single Canadian. No damage. The skies up north … they remain safe. The CAA is so much more sane and responsive to facts, than is our vaunted, Boeing challenged, FAA.
Being an FAA certified A&P mechanic, I think it is it is important to note that after you confirm their credentials, that you do NOT hand them your card. As soon as you hand them your card and if they take it, it is considered surrendering your card (license). They can observe your card while you are holding it. If you (accidentally) surrender your license, you have to go through the whole original process of getting certified all over again - including that first initial proctored emam. (This is something that we were all told about and taught).
Thank you for touching on this subject. Everyone flying recreationally needs to know this information and have a plan. I agree with everything you said except for the ID part. If a local police officer or deputy comes up to you and asks for your ID, they still need reasonable articualable suspicion of a crime to ID you. If you are not breaking any laws, then you wouldn't have to show ID. From what I understand, the only thing you need to present is your trust certificate for a recreational flight. Again, thanks for touching on this important subject
Like my friend likes to say "you may have the right of way but the other driver is driving a Mack truck". If the LEO has been dispatched to investigate what you're doing, I would personally show him/her my ID because if I don't my interaction is gonna get ugly soon enough especially if the officer isn't too well versed in the FAA regulations.
@@Errr717 just ask "if I do not present my documents will I be arrested or fined?" If yes then comply, state "I'm complying under duress," and sue later since you have damages.
HOVERAir drones open up a whole other can of "recreational use" as they can be flown without a controller by using the pre-programmed buttons. They are practically toys in this capacity. So many rules for such a small "drone".
Thank you for the excellent videos!! I used to fly small RC planes and helicopters but after a many year break, am just starting back and decided to try small drones. All just for fun! I diligently studied the rules and feel confident that I am fully in compliance with 44809 (TRUST certificate, registration, B4UFLY, LAANC when needed and I’ve studied the latest AMA (CBO) rules). My lingering anxiety is that some local authority who is not completely informed about the real regulations, and is instead influenced by media hype to be fearful of drones as some kind of threat to humanity, is going to ruin my enjoyment and turn it into some kind of legal nightmare. I never had that kind of fear with my little foam park-flyer RC planes. No one else feared them back in the day either. Stray baseballs or angry hawks were more perceived dangers! Even a tiny “quad-copter” does not sound like a threat. But, put the name “drone” on it and rational thought seems to go out the window.. This video helps me feel a little more confident. Please pardon the rant. Here are my more constructive questions: Do you think it is worth the extra money for me to actually re-join the AMA to get a card confirming I am a member and am therefore operating under those rules? I don’t think it is technically required but wonder if you know of any situations where this was practically helpful? I am also studying to get the full 107 certificate for a similar reason. Not because I think I really need it for my personal hobby, but because that certification might help me avoid potential unwarranted issues. Fun learning more about general aviation in any case. Your thoughts on that? I know I’m likely being overly cautious. That is just what us folks who try to follow the rules do 😊.
So, I need more documents to fly a 260 gram foam board model airplane than I needed to fly a Cessna back when I was flying maned aircraft. Makes perfect sense.
This is the simplest yet most comprehensive list I've seen. Now off to find my aircraft registration certificates. Where do you get the fancy FAA-printed recurrent certificate? Did they mail that? I just took it online and don't remember getting anything nice like that.
Thanks! It's been a few months but I thought there was a button or link to "print" the recurrent certificate... Could always take it again to get to to the screen again. It's nice that its free and easy now instead of spending $150 and heading off to a testing center every 2 years.
There is an option to Download it as a PDF and save it on your phone just like the waiver and Lannc. Also, it’s very rare for an FAA inspector to show up when your flying but this video is helpful when they check for papers 🤣
@@peacefulthrillseeker Indeed it is rare, I imagine if you fly a lot in controlled airspace near high profile airspace you would have a significantly increased probability of FAA or local security/police rolling up...
@@AlienDrones it’s more common for a police officer to come up to you than the FAA in most situations which has happened to me before. To mitigate this and a professional courtesy( especially when working a gig) is to approach law enforcement as well as other officials and give them a heads up, show them credentials, etc. you’d be surprised how much they appreciate that and they will go as far as assist you with the operation 👍🏽
Many of us bought a sub 250gram drone so as to not be required to register it with the FAA. But the TRUST certificate REQUIRES you to register your drone with the FAA. A government catch 22.
Howdy! TRUST test does not require registration if you're below 250g. If you're flying recreationally below 250g you are good to go without registration or remote ID! 🤙🤙
Show me your papers Comrade! Actually, thanks for this. I have heard various people make comments on this topic lately (e.g. heard one person say you had to have a copy of the CBO rules with you) and I appreciate you addressing it.👍
I will add another comment that I ran into on this subject. I had pilons around me and two cameras filming, when my first hostel approach. I have my vest one. FAA COMMERCIAL PILOT LICENSE, Please do not disturb. 3 people. I dropped my controller down around my neck and handed one a packet with a letter stating do not interfere while I flying, I will lad and talk with you, my card and IDENTIFICATION. I had it documented and came out okay but it was not pleasant. I’m not here to educate you but I have a job. Clueless. I landed and was able to deescalate the situation and leave. Came back the next day to finish the job. But it was real interesting to see how people reacted when close to there property.
@@SC515 Indeed, some people don't care if it's legal or legit, they already have their mind made up and will be a jerk. It's not only drones, some people are just idiots and there's no fixing stupid, even when you're in the right... Fortunately at least for me, I've been able to turn _most_ situations into a positive, but sometimes it's better to walk away and try another day...
I didn't get into this drone thing to do it with people. I'm a loner, and I do it as a form of getting away from people. Two years and no confrontations.
Thanks, not sure of anything specific, though might want to consider a bright tablet like the hugerock, you can see it in bright sun even without a visor... ruclips.net/video/yqrTTtjAH4Y/видео.html
Nope, not needed in the field. If you have an accident and depending on how bad the incident is then these might be asked for later as part of an investigation, but the requirement for these is based on whatever you decide it is. CYA for the insurance company maybe if flying commercially and they require it as part of your insurance, but not usually... Lots you CAN do if you want to CYA but not required...
Who does the FAA intend on requesting to go enforce these new rules at every corner of every rural area in North America? Because I have zero intentions on flying, landing or piloting my drone at or anywhere near an airport, which is the only place I’ve ever even heard of an FAA official being present. Nor do I plan on flying my drone over about 400-450 AGL. In most cases there is no reason for it and I certainly wouldn’t want to chance having my drone at Ann altitude that could interfere with air plane traffic. Also it sounds like a good handful of these new FAA rules were made by a committee of people who have never piloted a drone.
When I talked with the FAA, they said they rely on compliance more than enforcement though they do partner with LEO to the extent they are interested in enforcing federal laws. They (the FAA) will only really do anything when something happens (a flight-for-life helicopter gets diverted, a fly-away hits a car on a highway, hits a commercial airliner, etc.) and then they unload with all the infractions. That being said, I just saw some articles recently that the FAA has been getting nastier regarding "after the fact" fines.
Very nice Keith. Although, I never knew that we "pilots" COULD GET a waiver for BVLOS. Even though I never fly more than I can see, but yeah. If I ever wanted one, where do I get one? Thanks for sharing. 👍👍👍
I will never, NEVER take or pay for the extremely government overreach Part 107! It is none of the FAA's business if I post drone video on RUclips or not! None of their business!! The business of the FAA should be for safety, not shakedowns! How about the FAA concentrate on Boeing instead of drones!
Great educational videos! I have the New DJI Mini 4 Pro (under the weight limit)....and I am not planning to register it because I only fly on my property or maybe a hike to check out the view. Do I have to carry any of that paperwork being my drone is a mini? Additionally... my drone does NOT require Remote ID but apparently it came installed and puts out a signal anyway....what can I do to avoid being on the radar to protect myself from someone having bad intentions coming to find me???
This is a very common misunderstanding. Being below 250g doesn't get you any exemptions except _possibly_ registration. So, yes, regardless of the weight you still need the paperwork mentioned here (Items 1-5, with the exception of item #3 since you are planning not to register). #4 is situational, so depending what you're doing or where you're flying it may be a requirement, even as a recreational pilot. As far as the broadcast transmitting, if that's a concern there is no option except to use a different drone. The RID cannot be turned off on UASs supplied with RID already installed.
A recent update from DJI makes the mini 3 and 4 pro NOT transmit RID with the smaller battery installed, those drones DO transmit with the PLUS battery installed.
@@fez3606 Indeed, that is a welcomed recent decision by DJI to serve the recreational community. I'm sure they were seeing a huge decrease in sales because of the RID transmitting regardless.... Money talks, sometimes.
@@fez3606which is a huge mistake on the part of DJI. They need a means by which the PIC can turn the RID on or off depending on what the PIC determines is appropriate for a given flight!!!! Smaller battery, automatically no RID, but I’m flying under 107…… now I have to stick on a damn RID module. Oh but wait, if the aircraft is equipped with standard RID (manuf internal) capability I’m not allowed to turn it off….. but I just did by putting in a smaller battery. Really STUPID to not have a PIC controlled (at least when the smaller battery is installed) RID in the controller. So, I have the smaller battery but put on a strobe and am now over 250g. Ooops, Mini 4 pro with prop guards DJI says only with the smaller battery. Now I’ve got an aircraft over 250g and DJI turned off the damn RID. Do I put an external RID module and increase risk or tell the gooberment to pound sand? Hey left hand, the right hand is over there. Why don’t you two GTF out of the way.
What would I give them ? The middle finger...that's what...The FAA and the AMA can kiss my shiny metal butt...I've been flying rc for 40 years now...without guvmint help...More people die every year from baseball injuries than ever flying rc... The new FAA rules allow flying over people and property..Something we hobbyists deemed a hazard too many years ago to count.. good idea FAA...🙄
So I have a DJI mini pro 4. I have both the 249g battery and the above 249g identify battery. If registered can I fly my drone based battery used. Commercial on one and recreational on the other?
Nope, not quite depending on what you're implying. The problem is that if the drone is registered it must also transmit remote ID. If you put the smaller batteries in to fly recreationally under USC 44809 and the remote ID turns off you are non-compliant because the drone is still registered and not transmitting RID, so you'd have to add a RID module to it. You could de-register it, but then you'd have to re-register it (and pay another $5) to register it again every time you change batteries, IF you want to fly recreationally under 44809 rules. What you could do though is simply fly under part 107, but in a "recreational fashion". This means you are still following part 107 rules flying for fun, but under part 107 rule set and you are not following USC 44809 rules, ever. Hope that makes sense.
@@AlienDronesI think that’s wrong. Part 107 and fly for the fun of it works right up to the point he puts in the smaller battery and the RID goes off. He has turned off RID by installing the smaller battery and an RID module won’t satisfy the regulation because the drone has RID capability built in. Further I’m not sure you can register a module in a drone that’s on the RID roster.
@@OpenCarryUSMC The reply is correct as stated. The issue is that if the drone is registered you need to transmit remote ID. You can add a module to it without issue, when registering it you need to select no RID built in, which is true in this case with a smaller battery. Then the module information is entered.
I know all the videos I see on RUclips and Facebook flying over people, at night, >400 ft etc are not 107 certified. It seems pretty wild west out there with a lot of drone pilots not even knowing what 107 is.
Indeed, that is true. We can thank many of them for the increasing restrictions, regulations and new laws that are continuing to target the hobby for sure... I've reached out to a few just suggesting they may want to look at the rules and most of the time they say that the rules don't apply to them for one reason or another, especially because recreational flyers of mini drones don't need to follow any rules, it's just a toy. I guess it's like the tree falling in the forest making a sound analogy: If I don't read or acknowledge any rules, do they even exist? Apparently not. 😎 Thanks for sharing!
@@AlienDronesno, we can thank government over reach and tyranny as well as the environment of fear that has been created by government and their accomplices in the lane stream media. It’s been 23 years since 9-11 and yet these goons continue to cite that day as justification to terrorize the people. Enough.
I register to FAA with the trust test requirement got both on digital haven't print it yet... question the number for the drone does it have to be on the below 250grams mavic mini? Thanks edit he aloft app you mentioned on another video is saying that the max altitude on queens NY and Jamaica queens village is of 50 feet which is miles away from the airport or hospitals ( by the look of the app colored circle ) I message them showing maps of the highway and the MTA train yard that is huge I said my drone fits is my hand so imagine how small microscopic it shows on the map way out of range of any airplane traffic ...airplanes don't fly below 200 feet I fly usually 100 feet max but trees are taller than 50 feet it's ridiculous I have to fly below 50 in Sunnyside queens or queens village when the airport is about 30 minutes away by train ( just a rant about aloft FAA rules )
If you're flying for fun only, then you do not have to register the drone if it is less than 250g. If you are not flying for fun OR the drone weighs more than 250g (even if you're still flying for fun) then you have to register it and install Remote ID. I understand about having a altitude restriction where it doesn't make sense. Keep in mind that sometimes the apps are just wrong. I had that once and I sent in a request for review on the app (I think it was Airmap at the time) and it took a couple of days but the map was updated and the restrictions in the area were gone.
@@AlienDrones thanks I registered because the holystone is a little more than 250grams but when it started to go crazy on me I stopped flying above tree level so I bought the mavic mini so my registration would be for the mini and whatever I buy after then... thank you 👍
Yup, no problem, as long as the drone RID is registered under part 107, not recreational. In other words, the drone can't have a recreational registration and flown under part 107.
so what would happen to a company if they hire someone to fly a drone for them and the guy gets arrested? would they be fined? I applied for a videographer job for a construction company who wanted someone with drone experience and never asked me if i had a part 107. should i warn them about making sure the guy they did hire has one?
There's no "drone police" out there, anf the FAA is unlikely to follow up, it's simply a matter of resources. That being said, it's never a problem until there's a problem. If someone without their certification is doing commercial work and something happens the company hiring can be liable as well, so it is a bad idea in general, but again, there will probably be no problem until the drone hurts someone, diverts a flight or causes damage, THEN it is found out that the pilot isn't certified and the company is using them. I would mention to the company, maybe they just don't know. Reference: bit.ly/47b3tTI
Indeed, the one I show that I was clicking in the video is the least obnoxious one by far. I actually said that in a part of the video that got cut to try and get closer to 3 minutes... 😎
What i want to know is why is my drone listed on the declaration of compliance list when it is incapable of broadcasting a remote id signal. It literally doesn't have the built-in hardware, yet there it is all compliant and shit according to the agency that'll fine me if i fly it, lol. Im going to fly it anyway. Im sure Mr FAA agent man has a non answer.
What kind of ID is my kid going to have to prove he is eho is named on thr TRUST certification? There is no age restriction for TRUST thst i am aware of.
That's a good question. First, they should be named on the TRUST certificate. For an ID, this is an exception that I imagine would be the same if any juvenile were stopped/questioned by the authorities for something else. Not that I can confirm or deny that I was ever in this situation but if something is being done that warrants further action (flying in an unsafe manner, flying in controlled airspace or restricted launch/land zone, basically not following rules) and in the absence of an ID in the case of a minor, then they will ask name and where they live/staying and follow them home to take it further with the parent/guardian. You are the responsible one in this situation.
@@AlienDronesoh you don’t understand how militarized, aggressive, and disgusting the police have become. They routinely cuff minors at schools and haul them off for interrogation without parents around. And we’re not talking seriously bad actors like gang bangers. Exercise free speech, violate a school policy (which is not law thus not arrestable) and kids end up in cuffs and transported. It’s disgusting.
So what you're telling me is that even though I'm flying under the weight and recreationally, I'm needing to get certification to fly my drone, at this point I might as well just forget about my tiny drone, get a nice big drone register it, get the certification even though I don't want to deal with the stupid remote ID, especially where all that's going to do is cause you to get harassed by anyone and everyone because they have a Nifty app to harass you.
Nah, just get a part 103 aircraft and you don’t need registration, license, or even any training. Lots more fun. And there’s even an 8 motor electric copter (think big drone) that is manned and under part 103. That one’s a bit soendy but prices are gonna come down. Or grab a powered parachute and go fly with zero training, no license, no registration, etc. Part 103 allows an a manned aircraft with an empty weight of up 254 pounds and no regs but a frickin unmanned toy that’s less than a pound requires stupid hoops. That alone is enough to show the idiocy of part 107
But will a registered drone under 250g fliying recreationaly still need remote ID? My first gen Mavic Mini doesn't support RID and it's so expensive to get that module!
@CtoGuantanamo , @RebelByNature is correct, IF you fly _only_ recreationally. If it is registered for any reason, even if it's not required (that's why I say it this way) then it needs RID. Holy stone is the cheapest stand alone module I've tested to date ruclips.net/video/CY4syImI9xg/видео.html , and it's fairly light as well. And you can simply un-register it if registration isn't required, then no remote ID is needed! 🤙
Yes, all things mentioned (either recreational or Part 107) plus you need a VO (visual Observer) to be legal. Look up the CBO from the FPV coalition fpvfc.org/safety-guidelines for the CCBO to follow.
@@KazanskyAlex You need everything mentioned in this video (certificate, ID, waivers/authorizations, plus CBO rules printed is recommended) PLUS you need a VO present (another person watching without goggles) if you're flying with goggles... The only thing not registering gets you is that you don't need registration documents or remote ID, you need everything else.
@@KazanskyAlex The certificate is the TRUST certificate. It is REQUIRED to be legal to fly in the US, at a minimum www.scouting.org/the-recreational-uas-safety-test/ . Its FREE, easy and is very informative. The waivers/authorizations are only needed if you NEED waivers or authorizations depending on the airspace you're flying in. This may be LAANC authorization or something else. Once you take the TRUST test, it will make more sense, it is a good way to start learning all the details of flying a drone legally according to the FAA. If you have questions once you pass the TRUST test feel free to ask, happy to help.!
@@AlienDronesdidn’t like her but she didn’t get lost. She destroyed the gateway because it was the right thing to do even though it was a hard thing to do. Kind of like telling a cop NO
All of the items mentioned in the video (certificate, ID, authorizations, CBO Rules) with the 1 possible exception of registration (maybe), are legally required for drones under 250g as well. This is a common misconception that sub 250g drones get a pass on any rules or regulation but this is simply not true. Please take a moment and take the TRUST test, it is required, easy, free and it is helpful to get some basic understanding of flying drones legally: www.scouting.org/the-recreational-uas-safety-test/ . Any questions let me know, happy to help if I can.
My question from the beginning is how does this do anything to prevent bad actors from misbehaving? I already have a part 107, can read a sectional and understand where and when I can fly. How does this benefit me or the general public? A few years ago, at AUVSI there were rumors floating around that several appointees at the FAA were heavily invested in some of the tech being developed for RID and hence the push for it in the industry. I also own and fly paramotors. Something with much more mass, combustible fuel, and a twentieth the maneuverability of any of my sUAS platforms and the FAA couldnt care less. Legislation should be based in logic.
Exactly, these rules are insane for tiny drones when a paramotor carrying hundreds of pounds of who knows what, with ranges of over 100 miles has no regulation at all. What are they protecting and who is paying them to push this insanity?
So not remembering which CBO rules one is following defaults one back to part 107 rules. I am amazed at all the well thought out and expensive traps they have created for us.
I’m curious if they’ll be more concerned about my drone or the pistol and spare mags outside my belt, or maybe the police body can that’s blinking….. recording their violations for the lawsuit.
Great video! I’m a FAA 107 pilot and carry all my paperwork including my insurance and certifications in a binder. I find many recreational flyers especially those with sub 250 drones think they don’t have to do any training. I direct them to the FAA website to take the trust test and explain how easy it is.
Indeed, I've had many conversations with newbies that think "sub 250g = exempt" from any rules/regulations... That's the right thing to do is point to the TRUST, it is very informational if you're new to the hobby...
@@mikehays6526 SkyWatch. Depends on how much you fly and what coverage you want. Starts at $10 for an hour. If you fly on and off you can do monthly $46 and up or if you fly all the time, $466 for a year
Show me your badge! Displays a state or city badge. -Kick rocks. Show me your badge! Displays a Federal id, not a USPS id either. -How may i help you. This is how it’s going to stay too.
I would suggest you instead print it. NEVER hand an unlocked phone to a government agent… EVER That is the definition of consent and they can then look through it, down load it, etc.
I like that you're answering questions. That's great. The answer is great. I hate the fluff. HATE IT!!! Coffee? Clock? Just do it without the fluff please.
I can train the drone police for a fee. It'll cost them airfare to Ukraine and a small fee to cover the costs of police whistles for them to run around fields with. I'm sure Russia and Ukraine would give me an armored vehicle they could drive around with. We all love our fun.
lol nope haha yeah im not carrying any of that + i let my registration lapse. I actually havent flown my drone since last june. anyone interested in a mavic air 2 (not the 2S) with 3 batteries that have undergone 50-60 charge cycles? as for govt regs... As Admiral Kathryn Janeway said: Oh, the almighty Temporal Prime Directive. ***"Take my advice: it's less of a headache if you just ignore it."***
almost feel the same way. Bought my Mavic 6 years ago and really only fly it once or twice a year. But after watching videos on this channel again and watching videos on Pilot Institute I am really thinking of doing the 107. I was against getting it before because I thought you had to take tests every few years and had to pay. Now I thought I read that you take the test once and it is good forever plus the Pilot Institute course is guaranteed 👍🏻 . I just found about that channel just today and now subscribed to it and will also checkout all he has to offer on his website … Thanks to this channel 👍🏻👍🏻
@@robskully3539 i see what your saying and good if that works for you but i cant say the same for my scenario as i really dont have any vested interest in shelling out the money for a part 107 when the type of flying i did didn't neccesitate one. its just another hoop for me to have to jump through and then theres always going to be another one after that.
A little late to the party, but in all the previous videos, interviews, etc, has it ever been explained why the remote ID needs to broadcast the operators location. I can understand, rather I agree or not, with wanting the UAV locations and id number. Anyone that really needed more than that would be from the FAA and have access to their database.
Bought a small drone (Mavic) when I left Calf and moved to Texas. I have flow it off and on with a group called The El Paso Drone Hive. But like the Hive I am loosing interest in the thing and decided not to fly it anymore. It was fun, as a recreational flyer, in the beginning but I don't plan making money from such activity so, bye, bye drone flying.
The FAA and its rules, are clearly unconstitutional as applied to a private citizen. Remote ID and part 107 are a blatant violation of the Bill of Rights. When anyone is approached by any government agent, they are under no obligation to answer any questions or produce any information. Every citizen has a right to reman silent and have counsel present when government is questioning them. Remember anything you say or do, can and will be used against you in a court of law. Don't say anything, keep your mouth closed, and shut up. Fly safe, fly free!
By any chance do you yourself have a 107 license? If so have you taken the latest one in which is actually a lot different in many questions that newer material would need to be studied. The charts remain the same though of course and about four or five of the old questions but that is about it. I believe it was February 9th. It was announced that the 2024 test would be out by that coming up Thursday. I tried rushing it in to focus my attention on the older study materials and test, the ,2024 107 test actually came out Tuesday so I was clearly wrong however I was still able to pass it. What I am getting to is the ,2024 test in regards to all the new laws and such focused on safety for all people around and operation of the flight. Therefore I was all for people understanding the test actually.. Yes I plan on part time commercial flying but only part time. I had studied hard for the test more to learn the safety areas of operating drones. Having the license is just an extra benefit nothing more. I do not know many drone operators either recreational and or 107 licensed however I flown my drone in a area I could legally with other drone operators in the area, unfortunately, I was hit over time unexpectedly twice by a inexperienced drone operator. The drone did not have the propeller guards on them and I was hurt pretty bad in one of the situations therefore I felt learning about everything could be beneficial for all to actually study nowadays. As much as you feel it is unconstitutional, please at least respect that the new test is for the safety and well being for all.
@@RickyL305 The airways are a public easement. We all have a constitutionally protected right to use them. The airways belong to all of us. As long as a private citizen flies their property (drone) in a manner that does violate the life, liberty or property of another, that person does not have to get governments permission to do so. In the event that a person flying a drone does violate the rights of another person, we have the "Bill of Rights" and due process of law to settle the issue. Part 107, does it violate the 1st Amendment? Is flying an FPV drone an art form? Are drone videos and photos an expression of that art form? Are drone videos, and photos, the intellectual property of the drone owner? Does the 1st Amendment protect the drone owners intellectual property from arbitrary government control and regulation? Does Part 107 violate 1st Amendment protections? While using a drone, can the FAA license, regulate and control a private citizen's 1st Amendment right to freedom of expression? Can a private citizen’s 1st Amendment intellectual property be sold without the permission and/ or licensing of the FAA? Does Part 107 turn 1st Amendment rights and protections into mere privileges that can be arbitrarily denied, regulated and controlled by the will of FAA without due process of law? "When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.
@@anonymoussoulFPV ..... I understand a lot when rules and laws change people get frustrated, I do and the only thing and this is why people need to turn to their local and state law makers if not the new rules and laws will be set in place. I have been hearing about case law being established now which occurs every time certain judicial actions are taken , some for the benefit of pilots both recreational and licensed and other times for those against them as well. I obviously see things a bit more different than you to at least to some degree anyhow. A example is, do you know that there is a drone pilot who claims he knows the laws , has a DJI drone I believe a mini two in Philadelphia who has his drone registered for the $5 dollars, claims he did the trust test but claiming he is a 107 drone Pilot who flies his drone on RUclips with a lot of subscribers not only getting paid monthly by RUclips but takes in daily donations from his subscribers for his video uploads which is against 107 commercial pilots rules and regulations. This man had his background check done by others proving he is a convicted two time child molester, charges of thefts, drugs, robbery ext. (18 charges in total that's viewable on Philadelphia dockets. ) It is not the same Philadelphia pilot now being fined 200 k for legally flying without the 107 either but a totally different pilot in the same general area. What I am getting at is why have such people giving drone pilots a worse reputation knowing this man had been charged and convicted as as a child sexual offender, court records showed he pimped these girls out and provided drugs to these children. Thank God the FAA for the 107 license do their own government background check as this guy is still on the streets of Ohio today taking videos of everyone including children. Sorry to inform you though we see things differently, certain rules and laws need to be in place but I will say that in a compromise that if there are rules and laws that do violate anything of course I would stand in support to have laws amended.
@@RickyL305 Your last comment, is nothing more than an emotional rant and completely off point. We are talking about constitutional law here. The man you are referring to, is presumed to be innocent. He is entitled to due process of law. I wasn’t there, so I don’t know what he did or didn’t do. I’m not going to try him in the court of public opinion. In the United States, we have a constitution that protects us from the FAA’s unconstitutional overreach! My understanding, Part 107, violates the 1st Amendment, by regulating and licensing a citizen's inalienable right to “freedom of expression”. It also denies the citizen ownership of the intellectual property derived from “freedom of expression.”
Look at Remote ID. On its face, it completely destroys the Bill of Rights. How can the FAA, a government agency, whether in public or not, force a citizen to wave their constitutionally protected rights (1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th Amendments) and submit to, without probable cause and/ or a 4th Amendment warrant, government tracking, surveillance, and control of a citizens private movements while enjoying a business or hobby, all while collecting and recording evidence that can, and will be used against a citizen in any FAA prosecution against them in a court of law? And, in most cases, forcing a citizen to pay for the surveillance equipment that will be used against them? How is this not a blatant violation of the Bill of Rights? "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law! "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) When the FAA is compliant with the Bill of Rights, I might consider complying with the FAA! Until then, fly safe, fly free.
I'm a recreational license operator. My house is surrounded by 800 acres of USDA government land. Have lived here for over 18 years and know all the employees here very well. Asked for permission to fly my drones before I started over a year ago when I retired. Never been approached by anyone when flying, but my registration number affixed to all of my drones.
All this advise seems to be predicated on many in your audience not having their Part 107 certification and the implication that their flights may or may not be within compliance to begin with. Here's a thought; Get your certification and make every effort come into compliance. Don't fly if there is any question on whether you are doing so lawfully. Nobody is paying you to be an outlaw. It is not profitable to proceed in ignorance.
I tried to give a balanced overview of both recreational and part 107 requirements because everybody starts out being recreational first, then progress to part 107 if it makes sense for them. Part 107 certification isn't for everybody, but regardless of your certification status, trying to be educated and follow the appropriate rules and knowing the consequences if you don't is always good form... I agree with you that everyone should "get your certification" as long that means that it could be part 107 or recreational certificate.
@@wp9002 There is a choice. AS the video says it's a choice, they call it an exception, but either way congress says there is a choice. I am not interested in getting a 107. It's not required and I don't need it to do anything I particularly want to do.
I start as a hobbyist and there is where I stay Many think a 107 is going to make MONEY 💰 for you It's all a fad . Just follow the rules and stay away from strangers !
If you are flying a drone under 250 grams you don’t need to register your drone unless you’re flying a part 107 flight. However you don’t need any documentation to fly a drone that doesn’t require registration. And even if you’re registered and are flying your drone. The law says that you don’t need to show your identification unless you’re suspected of a crime. There for you don’t have to show them anything. This has already been proven several times by drone pilots who had an encounter with law enforcement officers. As long as you are following the FAA guidelines you have no reason to show them anything. If you have done something illegal and they have seen it then you should provide your information. Let’s say you are flying your drone at a local park. You have not done anything illegal or wrong and police just want you to verify some identification or a proof of registration or something. Tell them to Go F themselves. Don’t forget in America you are protected by the constitution of the United States. If you are in another country then you might just be screwed. I don’t know I don’t follow laws about countries that I have never been to or ever planning on visiting.
Can you provide a citation to any of those cases where drone pilots won in the corrupt system after denying Cops their fishing trip? I agree 100%. No RAS no legal authority regardless of what any law, at any level, says. The Supreme Court has been clear, a citizen cannot be detained and forced to produce documents without RAS
All of the items mentioned in the video (certificate, ID, authorizations, CBO Rules) with the 1 possible exception of registration (maybe), are legally required for drones under 250g as well. This is a common misconception that sub 250g drones get a pass on any rules or regulation but this is simply not true. Please take a moment and take the TRUST test, it is required, easy, free and it is helpful to get some basic understanding of flying drones legally: www.scouting.org/the-recreational-uas-safety-test/ . Any questions let me know, happy to help if I can.
Not correct. ALL drone operators must have their certificate (either TRUST or 107) and your drone registration certificate (if you registered it) and (assuming you are making this comment because you aren't flying Part 107) the name of your CBO at a minimum (printed copy of those regs recommended).
Toed my quad into the trash, all you people kept calling them drones and the stupid public thinks you are spying on them it’s not worth all this to for around an ope field
If i havent said this before. I appreciate all you do for us. These subjects are not explained enough. Please , Please keep creating content like this. I share them with groups and on personal FB.
Thank you, I will! I do not say this often enough either and comments like these really do help creators out. It takes a lot of time and effort to put these together and if we only have trolls responding with crap, it makes it hard to do more. And let's face it, nobody LOVES more rules, so I get it. So make sure you comment your appreciation to your favorite creators, it is important and appreciated! 👽🛸
As an Airport Operations specialist who gets these questions quite often, this is a pretty good explanation and one I will be pointing people towards when they have questions.
To expound on why ALL drones are Part 107, it is because that is the section of the FARs that houses all the rules for UAS under 55 lbs. This is the same as Part 121 (All scheduled airline operations), Part 91 (All non scheduled, non commercial, non military flight), Part 103 (all manned aircraft under a max empty weight of 254 lbs ), etc.
Another Part of the FARs that frequently catches non aviation people is Part 77 which outlines obstruction to air navigation. The big catch is anything over 250 feet ANYWHERE in the US as well as obstacles lower than that on a slope towards the nearest runway (if you are within 4 miles of any public funded airport, you're best to check) then you can't exceed that height without an Obstruction Evaluation. Lots of times cranes will be erected to do some quick operation (like HVAC on a warehouse) and not go through the process, because the process takes weeks. So, you have a poor crane operator getting a visit from someone like me because their obstruction makes my airport unsafe and I have to close a runway or sometimes the full airport. The crane operator is not only fined by the FAA (which isn't cheap), but is civilly liable for all costs associated with their disruption.
The rules can be a PITA for all involved, but almost all of them are there from a safety standpoint that was unfortunately learned the hard way. To anyone wanting to fly your drone l, use the apps out there to check the airspace. If you're in a congested area, go only as high as you need. When in doubt, call the Airport Operations at the nearest airport. Most of us are drone pilots and love to talk about them. We're happy to give info on when and where are the best places to fly, how to fly safely around our airspace,and work to get you waivers if your mission requires it. Contrary to belief,most of the people in the FAA and airport operations want to help make the sky open to all, we just have to work a lot of compromises to make sure everyone fits.
Thanks for Sharing! 🤙
Part 77 rules on obstruction are for "objects" and not aircraft, I would assume, correct? And is it 200ft AGL within 3NM, and then 300ft, 400ft, 499ft agl for every NM distant, up to 5NM?
@@alacazaba it is for objects based on height. Moored balloons and such are tangentially related,but have their own specific rules.
I don't want to get into a really long comment about the various imaginary surfaces over a runway. There are five of them (Primary, Approach, Transitional, Horizontal,and Conical) because each one could be its own topic. Basically, a decent rule of thumb is to assume a 20 to 1 slope from the edge of the runway. So go out 20 feet, up 1, another 20 and up another foot. The truth is there are various slopes depending on the length of the runway and additional, more restrictive slopes will be added for runways with instrument approaches. It gets pretty complicated at an airport like O Hare where you have multiple runways, extremely low visibility approaches,and they intersect.
The FAA requires that any obstacle that may potentially violate these be evaluated. You can submit an OE/AAA (Obstruction Evaluation/ Airport Airspace Analysis) request for free online and usually get a report back in a couple of weeks. It will basically come back with how the obstacle effects the National Airspace System. To be VERY clear, it doesn't prohibit the object, it just outlines the impact and what must change in the NAS to accommodate it. It is the entities on the ground that can regulate it based on the impact to their airport. This is why cities don't get to build skyscrapers off a runway. Because the FAA says the runway is unsafe for use and their airport is then impacted. It is cheaper to zone the buildings then move the runway.
So, moral of the story is if you are within about 4 miles (straight line) of a public use runway and need to do something taller than your roof line, do a quick Google Earth measurement to the nearest point of the runway and divide that number by 20. That is how tall you can go before the FAA cares. If the number is 250 or higher, the FAA will always care.
Hey Parker I have a question when someone gets pre-authorization to fly their drone and class D airspace does the control tower get notified that there is drones in the vicinity and are man pilots notified or have equipment on their airplanes that let them know that there is drones nearby?
@@jay-dt3zq , So the authorization will be sent to Air Traffic Manager and the Airport Manager and will outline the time of the operation, location, and max permissable altitude. It will also detail if any operational changes need to occur at airport for safety (no instrument operation from a runway, closed runway, opposite traffic pattern, etc.). There will always be a note that operation of the drone still requires ATC approval and the ATC facility and Airport Operations must be called before liftoff and once the operation is complete. This is the part that catches most drone pilots. Just because you have the DroneZone paper doesn't mean you have carte blanche to fly.
LAANC authorizations don't usually have that contact requirement, but LAANC is more tightly restricted on altitudes.
There is nothing the drone sends out that a manned aircraft can detect. Aircraft have ADS-B In/Out for manned flights, but to minimize congestion, drones are only allowed to receive this info (ADS-B In), not transmit (ADS-B Out). If UAS operations are occuring within the Class D the best practices is for the Airport Authority to issue a Notice to Air Missions (NOTAM), which alerts air raft operators in the area. The ATC will then update their Automated Terminal Information Service (ATIS) to reflect the NOTAM.
Authorization at a Class D isn't too difficult for a Part 107 that is willing to work around the operational tempo. Class C is harder, but possible as long as not in an approach corridor. Class B is exceedingly difficult and practically never gets authorized off the runway ends.
I live on 93 acres situated outside any flight restriction areas. I’ll fly my drone recreationally and whenever I choose, and “the man” is not coming onto my private property to check anything.
That's always a personal choice!
except the man has every right to enter with probable cause. but i feel ya. sadly i think that my time as a drone pilot is at an end. i havent flown in 7 Mo.
Not without a warrant, their not. The FAA has not jurisdiction on private property. Pursuant to the 9th and 10th Amendments, US Constitution, the federal government cannot assume powers not specifically granted to it by the Constitution. There has never been a constitutional amendment establishing the FAA in the US, until that happens, it is my position that the FAA has no constitutional authority over the actions of any private citizen. Congress cannot grant the FAA power, that Congress itself does not have under the US Constitution. Assuming that the FAA is constitutional, it does not have the authority regulate the privately owned air space that reaches the enveloping atmosphere of a persons real property, anymore than having the authority to regulate the airspace within ones home. The US Supreme Court has ruled, a landowner owns as much of the space above the ground as he can occupy or use in connection with the land. Flying a quadcopter around and above privately own trees, buildings, animals, or any other object owned, controlled, and connected to the property, is clearly an activity that is done in direct connection with the use of the land. Privately owned airspace is as much a property right as anything else attached to the property. The government cannot take possession of privately owned airspace and tell a landowner how privately owned airspace can, or cannot be used, without due process of law. The United States Supreme Court ruled, “We have said that the airspace is a public highway. Yet it is obvious that, if the landowner is to have full enjoyment of the land, he must have exclusive control of the immediate reaches of the enveloping atmosphere. . . . . The landowner owns at least as much of the space above the ground as they can occupy or use in connection with the land.” States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256 (1946) If you don't stand up for your constitutionally protected rights, you don't have them.
@@0utcast On private property, the FAA cannot prove probable cause by simply observing a drone in the air. Without knowing who is flying the drone, how much it weighs, etc., there is no probable cause for anything, only speculation. Without the drone operator volunteering information related to the drone, the FAA can only assume that the drone in question is under 250 grams. Since a citizen has no obligation to witness against themselves, the FAA must make their own independent investigation on the matter, and cannot enter upon private property without a 4th Amendment warrant. Fly safe, fly free!
@@0utcastnot without a warrant
I still hear from all of these videos that, when asked, "the intent of my flight is solely for recreation and I had line of sight" would be hard to disprove in court, if it ever got that far.
Keep in mind it's easy for someone on a video to tell others to be cavalier about the rules but when you're in front of the judge and the FAA says you were not following the rules and here's why, the guys in the video won't be there to back you up, just sayin. In your other comment you mentioned you don't have a clue about CBOs. That in itself is against the rules and means the FAA (and the law) will judge your flights against part 107 rules and will add this to what will be a large list of 107 rules not followed, doesn't matter if they can't prove one beyond a reasonable doubt. The FAA isn't out to get people, I've actually found most to be really decent and they love the hobby. If you make some effort to become knowledgeable and follow the rules at all you likely won't have an issue even if something goes wrong.
You realize you can right now, get into an ultralight aircraft that weighs 254 pounds, it poses a far more significant threat to manned aircraft and not have to do anything the things FAA is requiring for 251 gram drone? How is that fair? This is why I mostly ignore FAA I use LAANC and stay under 400 feet, I use LAANC to avoid restricted airspace beyond that the FAA isn't going to over regulate my hobby or ruin my fun. I'd be happy to school FAA in SCOTUS about my rights they are violating.
as for cbo's, pilot institute has an article about WHICH cbo to choose for rules to follow....you don't need to be a member to follow the cbo's, btw. The 3 CBOs noted: Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA), First Person View (FPV) Freedom Coalition, Flite Test Community Association (FTCA) ----- and these rules apply whether you fly under 250g up to 55lb. If you are 107, when flying rec you will need to cite a CBO.
I just randomly picked one because it's pointless.
I Have my trust certification. Need to find it as I have not flown my drone in awhile.ohh and need to re register it too.
Did you print it out, or did they send it to you via email? [Contact them?] /// Also, it seems strange that, I do not see a gov website data Website, that would allow verification of license (TRUST), via name, email and or License number of the given, (TRUST LICENSE), that has been issued. Would be nice to be able to verify you have a valid TRUST License, and did not have a, (maybe not good one done), does anyone have an answer on this????? - Should not the Government have a data base on this, so that you and or authorities may check? - PLEASE COMMENT, or is this a xyz ........ ? /// And, NO NO NO, blah blah blah, just take again??? - How would a ........ verify your TRUST license in the field?
It will be interesting to see what the Chevron case does to the FAA, especially on this subject. I really want to get into this hobby...
Will be interesting for sure, but based on past government impingement, I'm not as optimistic as I once was...
Good review of the rules. Did you know, that up in Canada, you do not need to register sub 250g drones. And you can fly them FPV sans spotter, or BVLOS. And … here’s the kicker … nothing … yeah … nothing. No harm has befallen a single Canadian. No damage. The skies up north … they remain safe. The CAA is so much more sane and responsive to facts, than is our vaunted, Boeing challenged, FAA.
Thanks. I just shared your video to a local drone group on the Nextdoor app.
Awesome, thank you, appreciate that! 🤙
Being an FAA certified A&P mechanic, I think it is it is important to note that after you confirm their credentials, that you do NOT hand them your card. As soon as you hand them your card and if they take it, it is considered surrendering your card (license). They can observe your card while you are holding it. If you (accidentally) surrender your license, you have to go through the whole original process of getting certified all over again - including that first initial proctored emam.
(This is something that we were all told about and taught).
Thanks for sharing!
Thank you for touching on this subject. Everyone flying recreationally needs to know this information and have a plan. I agree with everything you said except for the ID part. If a local police officer or deputy comes up to you and asks for your ID, they still need reasonable articualable suspicion of a crime to ID you. If you are not breaking any laws, then you wouldn't have to show ID. From what I understand, the only thing you need to present is your trust certificate for a recreational flight. Again, thanks for touching on this important subject
Thanks for sharing!
Like my friend likes to say "you may have the right of way but the other driver is driving a Mack truck". If the LEO has been dispatched to investigate what you're doing, I would personally show him/her my ID because if I don't my interaction is gonna get ugly soon enough especially if the officer isn't too well versed in the FAA regulations.
@@Errr717 just ask "if I do not present my documents will I be arrested or fined?" If yes then comply, state "I'm complying under duress," and sue later since you have damages.
Thanks for the reminder to save all these documents to an easily accessible location.
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you! I just watched a few of your videos and just got the Trust Certificate. Part 107 Next!
Nice! 🤙 Thanks for sharing!
HOVERAir drones open up a whole other can of "recreational use" as they can be flown without a controller by using the pre-programmed buttons. They are practically toys in this capacity. So many rules for such a small "drone".
Thank you for the excellent videos!!
I used to fly small RC planes and helicopters but after a many year break, am just starting back and decided to try small drones. All just for fun! I diligently studied the rules and feel confident that I am fully in compliance with 44809 (TRUST certificate, registration, B4UFLY, LAANC when needed and I’ve studied the latest AMA (CBO) rules).
My lingering anxiety is that some local authority who is not completely informed about the real regulations, and is instead influenced by media hype to be fearful of drones as some kind of threat to humanity, is going to ruin my enjoyment and turn it into some kind of legal nightmare.
I never had that kind of fear with my little foam park-flyer RC planes. No one else feared them back in the day either. Stray baseballs or angry hawks were more perceived dangers! Even a tiny “quad-copter” does not sound like a threat. But, put the name “drone” on it and rational thought seems to go out the window..
This video helps me feel a little more confident. Please pardon the rant. Here are my more constructive questions:
Do you think it is worth the extra money for me to actually re-join the AMA to get a card confirming I am a member and am therefore operating under those rules? I don’t think it is technically required but wonder if you know of any situations where this was practically helpful?
I am also studying to get the full 107 certificate for a similar reason. Not because I think I really need it for my personal hobby, but because that certification might help me avoid potential unwarranted issues. Fun learning more about general aviation in any case. Your thoughts on that?
I know I’m likely being overly cautious. That is just what us folks who try to follow the rules do 😊.
So, I need more documents to fly a 260 gram foam board model airplane than I needed to fly a Cessna back when I was flying maned aircraft. Makes perfect sense.
You can tell the government was thinking clear as mud 😂
yes another video from one of the channel that help faa.
Glad to help!
@@AlienDrones ;)
@OverlandWisconsinFTW sure. overcontrolled aerospace is the solution. 🎉
This is the simplest yet most comprehensive list I've seen. Now off to find my aircraft registration certificates. Where do you get the fancy FAA-printed recurrent certificate? Did they mail that? I just took it online and don't remember getting anything nice like that.
Thanks! It's been a few months but I thought there was a button or link to "print" the recurrent certificate... Could always take it again to get to to the screen again. It's nice that its free and easy now instead of spending $150 and heading off to a testing center every 2 years.
There is an option to Download it as a PDF and save it on your phone just like the waiver and Lannc. Also, it’s very rare for an FAA inspector to show up when your flying but this video is helpful when they check for papers 🤣
@@peacefulthrillseeker Indeed it is rare, I imagine if you fly a lot in controlled airspace near high profile airspace you would have a significantly increased probability of FAA or local security/police rolling up...
@@AlienDrones it’s more common for a police officer to come up to you than the FAA in most situations which has happened to me before. To mitigate this and a professional courtesy( especially when working a gig) is to approach law enforcement as well as other officials and give them a heads up, show them credentials, etc. you’d be surprised how much they appreciate that and they will go as far as assist you with the operation 👍🏽
Many of us bought a sub 250gram drone so as to not be required to register it with the FAA. But the TRUST certificate REQUIRES you to register your drone with the FAA. A government catch 22.
Howdy! TRUST test does not require registration if you're below 250g. If you're flying recreationally below 250g you are good to go without registration or remote ID! 🤙🤙
@ Then I received faulty information. Thank you for the correction.
Great information
Show me your papers Comrade! Actually, thanks for this. I have heard various people make comments on this topic lately (e.g. heard one person say you had to have a copy of the CBO rules with you) and I appreciate you addressing it.👍
Show me your papers Comrade! Oh, and you're vaccination card! Wait, that's a different video, lol. Thanks for sharing! 🤙
Great information. Thanks for the post
Thanks for watching!
I will add another comment that I ran into on this subject. I had pilons around me and two cameras filming, when my first hostel approach. I have my vest one. FAA COMMERCIAL PILOT LICENSE, Please do not disturb. 3 people. I dropped my controller down around my neck and handed one a packet with a letter stating do not interfere while I flying, I will lad and talk with you, my card and IDENTIFICATION. I had it documented and came out okay but it was not pleasant. I’m not here to educate you but I have a job. Clueless. I landed and was able to deescalate the situation and leave. Came back the next day to finish the job. But it was real interesting to see how people reacted when close to there property.
@@SC515 Indeed, some people don't care if it's legal or legit, they already have their mind made up and will be a jerk. It's not only drones, some people are just idiots and there's no fixing stupid, even when you're in the right... Fortunately at least for me, I've been able to turn _most_ situations into a positive, but sometimes it's better to walk away and try another day...
I didn't get into this drone thing to do it with people. I'm a loner, and I do it as a form of getting away from people. Two years and no confrontations.
great video, im looking for a sun visor for my atom se controller. any suggestions?
Thanks, not sure of anything specific, though might want to consider a bright tablet like the hugerock, you can see it in bright sun even without a visor... ruclips.net/video/yqrTTtjAH4Y/видео.html
How about the flight log? service log of your drone?
Nope, not needed in the field. If you have an accident and depending on how bad the incident is then these might be asked for later as part of an investigation, but the requirement for these is based on whatever you decide it is. CYA for the insurance company maybe if flying commercially and they require it as part of your insurance, but not usually... Lots you CAN do if you want to CYA but not required...
Who does the FAA intend on requesting to go enforce these new rules at every corner of every rural area in North America? Because I have zero intentions on flying, landing or piloting my drone at or anywhere near an airport, which is the only place I’ve ever even heard of an FAA official being present. Nor do I plan on flying my drone over about 400-450 AGL. In most cases there is no reason for it and I certainly wouldn’t want to chance having my drone at Ann altitude that could interfere with air plane traffic. Also it sounds like a good handful of these new FAA rules were made by a committee of people who have never piloted a drone.
When I talked with the FAA, they said they rely on compliance more than enforcement though they do partner with LEO to the extent they are interested in enforcing federal laws. They (the FAA) will only really do anything when something happens (a flight-for-life helicopter gets diverted, a fly-away hits a car on a highway, hits a commercial airliner, etc.) and then they unload with all the infractions. That being said, I just saw some articles recently that the FAA has been getting nastier regarding "after the fact" fines.
Very nice Keith. Although, I never knew that we "pilots" COULD GET a waiver for BVLOS. Even though I never fly more than I can see, but yeah.
If I ever wanted one, where do I get one? Thanks for sharing. 👍👍👍
Thanks! It is possible, have to apply and be approved for it through the Drone Zone. It is a very difficult one to get but it has been done.
@@AlienDrones Thanks again.
the CBO part I still really have no clue about.......
Have you checked out this video? Might help: ruclips.net/video/b3yQYl7eAeQ/видео.html
@@AlienDrones I have. I just find the CBO rules contradictory and so restrictive I may as well not have this drone.
I will never, NEVER take or pay for the extremely government overreach Part 107! It is none of the FAA's business if I post drone video on RUclips or not! None of their business!! The business of the FAA should be for safety, not shakedowns!
How about the FAA concentrate on Boeing instead of drones!
Great educational videos!
I have the New DJI Mini 4 Pro (under the weight limit)....and I am not planning to register it because I only fly on my property or maybe a hike to check out the view. Do I have to carry any of that paperwork being my drone is a mini? Additionally... my drone does NOT require Remote ID but apparently it came installed and puts out a signal anyway....what can I do to avoid being on the radar to protect myself from someone having bad intentions coming to find me???
This is a very common misunderstanding. Being below 250g doesn't get you any exemptions except _possibly_ registration. So, yes, regardless of the weight you still need the paperwork mentioned here (Items 1-5, with the exception of item #3 since you are planning not to register). #4 is situational, so depending what you're doing or where you're flying it may be a requirement, even as a recreational pilot. As far as the broadcast transmitting, if that's a concern there is no option except to use a different drone. The RID cannot be turned off on UASs supplied with RID already installed.
A recent update from DJI makes the mini 3 and 4 pro NOT transmit RID with the smaller battery installed, those drones DO transmit with the PLUS battery installed.
@@fez3606 Indeed, that is a welcomed recent decision by DJI to serve the recreational community. I'm sure they were seeing a huge decrease in sales because of the RID transmitting regardless.... Money talks, sometimes.
@@fez3606which is a huge mistake on the part of DJI. They need a means by which the PIC can turn the RID on or off depending on what the PIC determines is appropriate for a given flight!!!!
Smaller battery, automatically no RID, but I’m flying under 107…… now I have to stick on a damn RID module.
Oh but wait, if the aircraft is equipped with standard RID (manuf internal) capability I’m not allowed to turn it off….. but I just did by putting in a smaller battery.
Really STUPID to not have a PIC controlled (at least when the smaller battery is installed) RID in the controller.
So, I have the smaller battery but put on a strobe and am now over 250g. Ooops,
Mini 4 pro with prop guards DJI says only with the smaller battery. Now I’ve got an aircraft over 250g and DJI turned off the damn RID. Do I put an external RID module and increase risk or tell the gooberment to pound sand?
Hey left hand, the right hand is over there. Why don’t you two GTF out of the way.
You forgot to say, no remote ID needed and no registration if under 250 grams and flying recreationally.
Didn't forget, just beyond the scope of a 3 minute vid. "If your drone is registered for any reason..."
What would I give them ? The middle finger...that's what...The FAA and the AMA can kiss my shiny metal butt...I've been flying rc for 40 years now...without guvmint help...More people die every year from baseball injuries than ever flying rc... The new FAA rules allow flying over people and property..Something we hobbyists deemed a hazard too many years ago to count.. good idea FAA...🙄
Why is your butt metal? 😅
@@AlienDrones I identify strongly with Bender the Robot and his attitude towards unnecessary intrusions on my life ..😅
@@steve_beatty 😅
So I have a DJI mini pro 4. I have both the 249g battery and the above 249g identify battery. If registered can I fly my drone based battery used. Commercial on one and recreational on the other?
Nope, not quite depending on what you're implying. The problem is that if the drone is registered it must also transmit remote ID. If you put the smaller batteries in to fly recreationally under USC 44809 and the remote ID turns off you are non-compliant because the drone is still registered and not transmitting RID, so you'd have to add a RID module to it. You could de-register it, but then you'd have to re-register it (and pay another $5) to register it again every time you change batteries, IF you want to fly recreationally under 44809 rules. What you could do though is simply fly under part 107, but in a "recreational fashion". This means you are still following part 107 rules flying for fun, but under part 107 rule set and you are not following USC 44809 rules, ever. Hope that makes sense.
@@AlienDronesI think that’s wrong. Part 107 and fly for the fun of it works right up to the point he puts in the smaller battery and the RID goes off. He has turned off RID by installing the smaller battery and an RID module won’t satisfy the regulation because the drone has RID capability built in. Further I’m not sure you can register a module in a drone that’s on the RID roster.
@@OpenCarryUSMC The reply is correct as stated. The issue is that if the drone is registered you need to transmit remote ID. You can add a module to it without issue, when registering it you need to select no RID built in, which is true in this case with a smaller battery. Then the module information is entered.
I know all the videos I see on RUclips and Facebook flying over people, at night, >400 ft etc are not 107 certified. It seems pretty wild west out there with a lot of drone pilots not even knowing what 107 is.
Indeed, that is true. We can thank many of them for the increasing restrictions, regulations and new laws that are continuing to target the hobby for sure... I've reached out to a few just suggesting they may want to look at the rules and most of the time they say that the rules don't apply to them for one reason or another, especially because recreational flyers of mini drones don't need to follow any rules, it's just a toy. I guess it's like the tree falling in the forest making a sound analogy: If I don't read or acknowledge any rules, do they even exist? Apparently not. 😎 Thanks for sharing!
@@AlienDronesno, we can thank government over reach and tyranny as well as the environment of fear that has been created by government and their accomplices in the lane stream media. It’s been 23 years since 9-11 and yet these goons continue to cite that day as justification to terrorize the people.
Enough.
I register to FAA with the trust test requirement got both on digital haven't print it yet... question the number for the drone does it have to be on the below 250grams mavic mini? Thanks edit he aloft app you mentioned on another video is saying that the max altitude on queens NY and Jamaica queens village is of 50 feet which is miles away from the airport or hospitals ( by the look of the app colored circle ) I message them showing maps of the highway and the MTA train yard that is huge I said my drone fits is my hand so imagine how small microscopic it shows on the map way out of range of any airplane traffic ...airplanes don't fly below 200 feet I fly usually 100 feet max but trees are taller than 50 feet it's ridiculous I have to fly below 50 in Sunnyside queens or queens village when the airport is about 30 minutes away by train ( just a rant about aloft FAA rules )
If you're flying for fun only, then you do not have to register the drone if it is less than 250g. If you are not flying for fun OR the drone weighs more than 250g (even if you're still flying for fun) then you have to register it and install Remote ID. I understand about having a altitude restriction where it doesn't make sense. Keep in mind that sometimes the apps are just wrong. I had that once and I sent in a request for review on the app (I think it was Airmap at the time) and it took a couple of days but the map was updated and the restrictions in the area were gone.
@@AlienDrones thanks I registered because the holystone is a little more than 250grams but when it started to go crazy on me I stopped flying above tree level so I bought the mavic mini so my registration would be for the mini and whatever I buy after then... thank you 👍
I am looking to get my Part 107. The drone I use is under the remote ID of my son’s name. Is that OK?
Yup, no problem, as long as the drone RID is registered under part 107, not recreational. In other words, the drone can't have a recreational registration and flown under part 107.
If I am already 107, I won't need to take the TRUST test, correct?
If you want to fly recreationally under USC 44809 (not under part 107) then you will need to take the TRUST test.
what is Part 107 Small Uas Recurrent - Part 61 Pilots certification, course #ALC -515 ?
That's the recurrent if you have your part 61 (manned aircraft certificate) as well as part 107 (remote pilot certificate).
so what would happen to a company if they hire someone to fly a drone for them and the guy gets arrested? would they be fined? I applied for a videographer job for a construction company who wanted someone with drone experience and never asked me if i had a part 107. should i warn them about making sure the guy they did hire has one?
There's no "drone police" out there, anf the FAA is unlikely to follow up, it's simply a matter of resources. That being said, it's never a problem until there's a problem. If someone without their certification is doing commercial work and something happens the company hiring can be liable as well, so it is a bad idea in general, but again, there will probably be no problem until the drone hurts someone, diverts a flight or causes damage, THEN it is found out that the pilot isn't certified and the company is using them. I would mention to the company, maybe they just don't know. Reference: bit.ly/47b3tTI
Any suggestions on the least obnoxious set of CBO rules to say you are following?
Indeed, the one I show that I was clicking in the video is the least obnoxious one by far. I actually said that in a part of the video that got cut to try and get closer to 3 minutes... 😎
@@AlienDrones Perhaps rules need to flexible 🤣
Cool👍😀
What i want to know is why is my drone listed on the declaration of compliance list when it is incapable of broadcasting a remote id signal. It literally doesn't have the built-in hardware, yet there it is all compliant and shit according to the agency that'll fine me if i fly it, lol. Im going to fly it anyway. Im sure Mr FAA agent man has a non answer.
What kind of ID is my kid going to have to prove he is eho is named on thr TRUST certification? There is no age restriction for TRUST thst i am aware of.
That's a good question. First, they should be named on the TRUST certificate. For an ID, this is an exception that I imagine would be the same if any juvenile were stopped/questioned by the authorities for something else. Not that I can confirm or deny that I was ever in this situation but if something is being done that warrants further action (flying in an unsafe manner, flying in controlled airspace or restricted launch/land zone, basically not following rules) and in the absence of an ID in the case of a minor, then they will ask name and where they live/staying and follow them home to take it further with the parent/guardian. You are the responsible one in this situation.
@@AlienDronesoh you don’t understand how militarized, aggressive, and disgusting the police have become.
They routinely cuff minors at schools and haul them off for interrogation without parents around. And we’re not talking seriously bad actors like gang bangers.
Exercise free speech, violate a school policy (which is not law thus not arrestable) and kids end up in cuffs and transported.
It’s disgusting.
So what you're telling me is that even though I'm flying under the weight and recreationally, I'm needing to get certification to fly my drone, at this point I might as well just forget about my tiny drone, get a nice big drone register it, get the certification even though I don't want to deal with the stupid remote ID, especially where all that's going to do is cause you to get harassed by anyone and everyone because they have a Nifty app to harass you.
Nah, just get a part 103 aircraft and you don’t need registration, license, or even any training.
Lots more fun.
And there’s even an 8 motor electric copter (think big drone) that is manned and under part 103.
That one’s a bit soendy but prices are gonna come down.
Or grab a powered parachute and go fly with zero training, no license, no registration, etc.
Part 103 allows an a manned aircraft with an empty weight of up 254 pounds and no regs but a frickin unmanned toy that’s less than a pound requires stupid hoops.
That alone is enough to show the idiocy of part 107
But will a registered drone under 250g fliying recreationaly still need remote ID? My first gen Mavic Mini doesn't support RID and it's so expensive to get that module!
Yes, if it's registered, game over, need RID. Need it to be registered? If not, I believe you can un register it.
@CtoGuantanamo , @RebelByNature is correct, IF you fly _only_ recreationally. If it is registered for any reason, even if it's not required (that's why I say it this way) then it needs RID. Holy stone is the cheapest stand alone module I've tested to date ruclips.net/video/CY4syImI9xg/видео.html , and it's fairly light as well. And you can simply un-register it if registration isn't required, then no remote ID is needed! 🤙
Do I need anything of these, if I fly a sub 250g fpv drone ?
Yes, all things mentioned (either recreational or Part 107) plus you need a VO (visual Observer) to be legal. Look up the CBO from the FPV coalition fpvfc.org/safety-guidelines for the CCBO to follow.
@@AlienDrones yeah, I know I need to folow CBO rules
But I mean, need I have anything with me as I not regestred the drone, because it sub 250g ?
@@KazanskyAlex You need everything mentioned in this video (certificate, ID, waivers/authorizations, plus CBO rules printed is recommended) PLUS you need a VO present (another person watching without goggles) if you're flying with goggles... The only thing not registering gets you is that you don't need registration documents or remote ID, you need everything else.
@@AlienDrones Thank you for your answers, but I still didn't get where I can get the certificate and the waiver ?
@@KazanskyAlex The certificate is the TRUST certificate. It is REQUIRED to be legal to fly in the US, at a minimum www.scouting.org/the-recreational-uas-safety-test/ . Its FREE, easy and is very informative. The waivers/authorizations are only needed if you NEED waivers or authorizations depending on the airspace you're flying in. This may be LAANC authorization or something else. Once you take the TRUST test, it will make more sense, it is a good way to start learning all the details of flying a drone legally according to the FAA. If you have questions once you pass the TRUST test feel free to ask, happy to help.!
Government regs..... Grrrrrrrrr
🐶 Grrrr.... 😅
As Admiral Kathryn Janeway said: Oh, the almighty Temporal Prime Directive. "Take my advice: it's less of a headache if you just ignore it."
But Janeway got lost, for years, and I think the promotion to Admiral was honorary. Not sure she's the one to take advice from... just sayin'😅
@@AlienDronesdidn’t like her but she didn’t get lost. She destroyed the gateway because it was the right thing to do even though it was a hard thing to do.
Kind of like telling a cop NO
Does any of this have to be done with a 249 g drone?
All of the items mentioned in the video (certificate, ID, authorizations, CBO Rules) with the 1 possible exception of registration (maybe), are legally required for drones under 250g as well. This is a common misconception that sub 250g drones get a pass on any rules or regulation but this is simply not true. Please take a moment and take the TRUST test, it is required, easy, free and it is helpful to get some basic understanding of flying drones legally: www.scouting.org/the-recreational-uas-safety-test/ . Any questions let me know, happy to help if I can.
Do I need a printout of the certificate, or can I show it on my phone?
My question from the beginning is how does this do anything to prevent bad actors from misbehaving? I already have a part 107, can read a sectional and understand where and when I can fly. How does this benefit me or the general public? A few years ago, at AUVSI there were rumors floating around that several appointees at the FAA were heavily invested in some of the tech being developed for RID and hence the push for it in the industry.
I also own and fly paramotors. Something with much more mass, combustible fuel, and a twentieth the maneuverability of any of my sUAS platforms and the FAA couldnt care less. Legislation should be based in logic.
Legislation must meet the mandates of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights, otherwise the law or rule in invalid!
Exactly, these rules are insane for tiny drones when a paramotor carrying hundreds of pounds of who knows what, with ranges of over 100 miles has no regulation at all. What are they protecting and who is paying them to push this insanity?
'They' fear the Camera.
@@fjanson2468 Government is concerned that "We the People" might use a drone pursuant to our second amendment rights!
@@ghettogardens1😄
And with the Ukrainian “experiments” posted so openly on RUclips….. they know some of “their subjects” are preparing.
It's the camera that Scares 'Them'.
...and their shadow... 😎
"I do not speak with law enforcement without a warrant and a lawyer."
So not remembering which CBO rules one is following defaults one back to part 107 rules. I am amazed at all the well thought out and expensive traps they have created for us.
haha I know right
I dont answer Questions.
Your paperz pleeze…
If law enforcement comes up to you asking silly questions, ask him about the regulations on GUNS!!!
I’m curious if they’ll be more concerned about my drone or the pistol and spare mags outside my belt, or maybe the police body can that’s blinking….. recording their violations for the lawsuit.
Great video! I’m a FAA 107 pilot and carry all my paperwork including my insurance and certifications in a binder.
I find many recreational flyers especially those with sub 250 drones think they don’t have to do any training. I direct them to the FAA website to take the trust test and explain how easy it is.
Indeed, I've had many conversations with newbies that think "sub 250g = exempt" from any rules/regulations... That's the right thing to do is point to the TRUST, it is very informational if you're new to the hobby...
We need insurance too? Anybody want to buy a Phoenix, cheap :(
@@oneninerniner3427 Insurance is not a requirement. It may be prudent depending on how/where you fly, but not required by the FAA.
Where r u getting your ins from and how much?
@@mikehays6526 SkyWatch. Depends on how much you fly and what coverage you want. Starts at $10 for an hour. If you fly on and off you can do monthly $46 and up or if you fly all the time, $466 for a year
Show me your badge!
Displays a state or city badge.
-Kick rocks.
Show me your badge!
Displays a Federal id, not a USPS id either.
-How may i help you.
This is how it’s going to stay too.
I have my trust test on my phone
Easiest way!
I would suggest you instead print it.
NEVER hand an unlocked phone to a government agent… EVER
That is the definition of consent and they can then look through it, down load it, etc.
All you have to say is " Can you educate me please !" 😂😂😂😂 to FAA person or Start running ...😂😂😂
...and hope the drone doesn't do an auto RTH! 😅
I like that you're answering questions. That's great. The answer is great. I hate the fluff. HATE IT!!! Coffee? Clock? Just do it without the fluff please.
I can train the drone police for a fee. It'll cost them airfare to Ukraine and a small fee to cover the costs of police whistles for them to run around fields with. I'm sure Russia and Ukraine would give me an armored vehicle they could drive around with. We all love our fun.
lol nope haha yeah im not carrying any of that + i let my registration lapse. I actually havent flown my drone since last june. anyone interested in a mavic air 2 (not the 2S) with 3 batteries that have undergone 50-60 charge cycles?
as for govt regs...
As Admiral Kathryn Janeway said: Oh, the almighty Temporal Prime Directive. ***"Take my advice: it's less of a headache if you just ignore it."***
almost feel the same way. Bought my Mavic 6 years ago and really only fly it once or twice a year. But after watching videos on this channel again and watching videos on Pilot Institute I am really thinking of doing the 107. I was against getting it before because I thought you had to take tests every few years and had to pay. Now I thought I read that you take the test once and it is good forever plus the Pilot Institute course is guaranteed 👍🏻 . I just found about that channel just today and now subscribed to it and will also checkout all he has to offer on his website … Thanks to this channel 👍🏻👍🏻
@@robskully3539 i see what your saying and good if that works for you but i cant say the same for my scenario as i really dont have any vested interest in shelling out the money for a part 107 when the type of flying i did didn't neccesitate one. its just another hoop for me to have to jump through and then theres always going to be another one after that.
there are more regulations on Drones now than Guns...amazing..!
A little late to the party, but in all the previous videos, interviews, etc, has it ever been explained why the remote ID needs to broadcast the operators location. I can understand, rather I agree or not, with wanting the UAV locations and id number. Anyone that really needed more than that would be from the FAA and have access to their database.
Bought a small drone (Mavic) when I left Calf and moved to Texas. I have flow it off and on with a group called The El Paso Drone Hive. But like the Hive I am loosing interest in the thing and decided not to fly it anymore. It was fun, as a recreational flyer, in the beginning but I don't plan making money from such activity so, bye, bye drone flying.
It mighy be easier to flee the country for flying a Drone in the park. Imagine if they gpot total firearms control!
The FAA and its rules, are clearly unconstitutional as applied to a private citizen. Remote ID and part 107 are a blatant violation of the Bill of Rights. When anyone is approached by any government agent, they are under no obligation to answer any questions or produce any information. Every citizen has a right to reman silent and have counsel present when government is questioning them. Remember anything you say or do, can and will be used against you in a court of law. Don't say anything, keep your mouth closed, and shut up. Fly safe, fly free!
By any chance do you yourself have a 107 license? If so have you taken the latest one in which is actually a lot different in many questions that newer material would need to be studied. The charts remain the same though of course and about four or five of the old questions but that is about it. I believe it was February 9th. It was announced that the 2024 test would be out by that coming up Thursday. I tried rushing it in to focus my attention on the older study materials and test, the ,2024 107 test actually came out Tuesday so I was clearly wrong however I was still able to pass it.
What I am getting to is the ,2024 test in regards to all the new laws and such focused on safety for all people around and operation of the flight. Therefore I was all for people understanding the test actually..
Yes I plan on part time commercial flying but only part time. I had studied hard for the test more to learn the safety areas of operating drones. Having the license is just an extra benefit nothing more.
I do not know many drone operators either recreational and or 107 licensed however I flown my drone in a area I could legally with other drone operators in the area, unfortunately, I was hit over time unexpectedly twice by a inexperienced drone operator. The drone did not have the propeller guards on them and I was hurt pretty bad in one of the situations therefore I felt learning about everything could be beneficial for all to actually study nowadays. As much as you feel it is unconstitutional, please at least respect that the new test is for the safety and well being for all.
@@RickyL305 The airways are a public easement. We all have a constitutionally protected right to use them. The airways belong to all of us. As long as a private citizen flies their property (drone) in a manner that does violate the life, liberty or property of another, that person does not have to get governments permission to do so. In the event that a person flying a drone does violate the rights of another person, we have the "Bill of Rights" and due process of law to settle the issue.
Part 107, does it violate the 1st Amendment? Is flying an FPV drone an art form? Are drone videos and photos an expression of that art form? Are drone videos, and photos, the intellectual property of the drone owner? Does the 1st Amendment protect the drone owners intellectual property from arbitrary government control and regulation? Does Part 107 violate 1st Amendment protections? While using a drone, can the FAA license, regulate and control a private citizen's 1st Amendment right to freedom of expression? Can a private citizen’s 1st Amendment intellectual property be sold without the permission and/ or licensing of the FAA? Does Part 107 turn 1st Amendment rights and protections into mere privileges that can be arbitrarily denied, regulated and controlled by the will of FAA without due process of law?
"When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.
@@anonymoussoulFPV ..... I understand a lot when rules and laws change people get frustrated, I do and the only thing and this is why people need to turn to their local and state law makers if not the new rules and laws will be set in place. I have been hearing about case law being established now which occurs every time certain judicial actions are taken , some for the benefit of pilots both recreational and licensed and other times for those against them as well. I obviously see things a bit more different than you to at least to some degree anyhow.
A example is, do you know that there is a drone pilot who claims he knows the laws , has a DJI drone I believe a mini two in Philadelphia who has his drone registered for the $5 dollars, claims he did the trust test but claiming he is a 107 drone Pilot who flies his drone on RUclips with a lot of subscribers not only getting paid monthly by RUclips but takes in daily donations from his subscribers for his video uploads which is against 107 commercial pilots rules and regulations.
This man had his background check done by others proving he is a convicted two time child molester, charges of thefts, drugs, robbery ext. (18 charges in total that's viewable on Philadelphia dockets. ) It is not the same Philadelphia pilot now being fined 200 k for legally flying without the 107 either but a totally different pilot in the same general area.
What I am getting at is why have such people giving drone pilots a worse reputation knowing this man had been charged and convicted as as a child sexual offender, court records showed he pimped these girls out and provided drugs to these children. Thank God the FAA for the 107 license do their own government background check as this guy is still on the streets of Ohio today taking videos of everyone including children. Sorry to inform you though we see things differently, certain rules and laws need to be in place but I will say that in a compromise that if there are rules and laws that do violate anything of course I would stand in support to have laws amended.
@@RickyL305 Your last comment, is nothing more than an emotional rant and completely off point. We are talking about constitutional law here. The man you are referring to, is presumed to be innocent. He is entitled to due process of law. I wasn’t there, so I don’t know what he did or didn’t do. I’m not going to try him in the court of public opinion.
In the United States, we have a constitution that protects us from the FAA’s unconstitutional overreach!
My understanding, Part 107, violates the 1st Amendment, by regulating and licensing a citizen's inalienable right to “freedom of expression”. It also denies the citizen ownership of the intellectual property derived from “freedom of expression.”
Look at Remote ID. On its face, it completely destroys the Bill of Rights. How can the FAA, a government agency, whether in public or not, force a citizen to wave their constitutionally protected rights (1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th Amendments) and submit to, without probable cause and/ or a 4th Amendment warrant, government tracking, surveillance, and control of a citizens private movements while enjoying a business or hobby, all while collecting and recording evidence that can, and will be used against a citizen in any FAA prosecution against them in a court of law? And, in most cases, forcing a citizen to pay for the surveillance equipment that will be used against them? How is this not a blatant violation of the Bill of Rights?
"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law!
"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
When the FAA is compliant with the Bill of Rights, I might consider complying with the FAA! Until then, fly safe, fly free.
@@anonymoussoulFPV ... He has his due process and was convicted in court , you just have no idea.
I'm a recreational license operator. My house is surrounded by 800 acres of USDA government land. Have lived here for over 18 years and know all the employees here very well. Asked for permission to fly my drones before I started over a year ago when I retired. Never been approached by anyone when flying, but my registration number affixed to all of my drones.
All this advise seems to be predicated on many in your audience not having their Part 107 certification and the implication that their flights may or may not be within compliance to begin with. Here's a thought; Get your certification and make every effort come into compliance. Don't fly if there is any question on whether you are doing so lawfully. Nobody is paying you to be an outlaw. It is not profitable to proceed in ignorance.
I tried to give a balanced overview of both recreational and part 107 requirements because everybody starts out being recreational first, then progress to part 107 if it makes sense for them. Part 107 certification isn't for everybody, but regardless of your certification status, trying to be educated and follow the appropriate rules and knowing the consequences if you don't is always good form... I agree with you that everyone should "get your certification" as long that means that it could be part 107 or recreational certificate.
Shouldn't there be a choice for people who do not want to get their 107 certification yet want to legally fly a drone?
@@wp9002 There is a choice. AS the video says it's a choice, they call it an exception, but either way congress says there is a choice. I am not interested in getting a 107. It's not required and I don't need it to do anything I particularly want to do.
Most drone fliers are recreational. It's not even close.
I start as a hobbyist and there is where I stay Many think a 107 is going to make MONEY 💰 for you It's all a fad . Just follow the rules and stay away from strangers !
If you are flying a drone under 250 grams you don’t need to register your drone unless you’re flying a part 107 flight. However you don’t need any documentation to fly a drone that doesn’t require registration. And even if you’re registered and are flying your drone. The law says that you don’t need to show your identification unless you’re suspected of a crime. There for you don’t have to show them anything. This has already been proven several times by drone pilots who had an encounter with law enforcement officers. As long as you are following the FAA guidelines you have no reason to show them anything. If you have done something illegal and they have seen it then you should provide your information. Let’s say you are flying your drone at a local park. You have not done anything illegal or wrong and police just want you to verify some identification or a proof of registration or something. Tell them to Go F themselves. Don’t forget in America you are protected by the constitution of the United States. If you are in another country then you might just be screwed. I don’t know I don’t follow laws about countries that I have never been to or ever planning on visiting.
Can you provide a citation to any of those cases where drone pilots won in the corrupt system after denying Cops their fishing trip?
I agree 100%. No RAS no legal authority regardless of what any law, at any level, says. The Supreme Court has been clear, a citizen cannot be detained and forced to produce documents without RAS
Unless you have under 250 grams 😂
All of the items mentioned in the video (certificate, ID, authorizations, CBO Rules) with the 1 possible exception of registration (maybe), are legally required for drones under 250g as well. This is a common misconception that sub 250g drones get a pass on any rules or regulation but this is simply not true. Please take a moment and take the TRUST test, it is required, easy, free and it is helpful to get some basic understanding of flying drones legally: www.scouting.org/the-recreational-uas-safety-test/ . Any questions let me know, happy to help if I can.
Not correct. ALL drone operators must have their certificate (either TRUST or 107) and your drone registration certificate (if you registered it) and (assuming you are making this comment because you aren't flying Part 107) the name of your CBO at a minimum (printed copy of those regs recommended).
Toed my quad into the trash, all you people kept calling them drones and the stupid public thinks you are spying on them it’s not worth all this to for around an ope field
What stupidity will be next
This crap should tell you one thing you own nothing and that government owns you. A free man doesn’t ask permission just gets it done.
Great information, thanks for sharing.
Glad it was helpful!