Why I Ignored Patrick D'Arcy, Attorney At Law for Mediation of Solicitation- Merb Rejected Debates!

A few minutes before work I will clear the air of the Short Bus Patrol Antics. I originally ask Merb to debate me. He refused. Then he made up lies about me. Why I Ignored Patrick D'Arcy/Merb's Invitation to Debate a Moot Point 101 🗣️❌
1. Merb falsely stated that I am claiming common law solicitation is identical in CA
2. Merb ignored that my video was based on American/English common law, model penal code and scenarios on the bar exam/law school.
3. D'Arcy probably was baited by these false statements and likely believed the Short Bus Patrol.
Here is an excerpt from original video: "When Ehline discusses soliciting a crime, he discusses general legal principles taught in LAW SCHOOLS unless he explicitly mentions a particular state. Here, Ehline discusses the FACT that Nevada conspiracy requires no act in furtherance, making it inchoate and close to common law "soliciting” a trespass." Source: • 🤔🏞️ "Soliciting a Tres...
4. I was trying to show how various state statutes could have subsumed traditional solicitation.
5. Merb admitted he NEVER WATCHED or viewed any of my videos and along with Short Bus Patrol, made multiple libelous and slanderous statements PER SE and went so far as to passively/actively encourage viewers to give my law firm 1 star reviews. (see also Discord videos and screenshots, text messages, etc.)
Welcome to our latest video, where we explore why I chose to ignore Patrick D'Arcy/Merb's invitation to debate a moot point. In the world of legal discussions and debates, it’s essential to pick your battles wisely. In this video, I explain the reasoning behind my decision, the importance of focusing on meaningful debates, and how to effectively prioritize your time and energy.
🔍 Key Topics Covered:
The Invitation: Overview of Patrick D'Arcy/Merb’s invitation and the topic proposed for debate.
Moot Point: Understanding what constitutes a moot point and why it may not be worth debating.
Strategic Decisions: The importance of choosing debates that matter and have real-world implications.
Legal Priorities: How to prioritize your involvement in legal discussions and debates effectively.
Expert Insights: My personal take on when to engage and when to step back from a debate.
💼 Why It's Important: Debates can be a valuable tool for exploring different viewpoints, but it's crucial to ensure the topics are substantial and relevant. This video provides insights into making strategic decisions about which debates to participate in, helping you make the most of your time and efforts.
📖 Educational Resource: This video serves as a resource for anyone involved in legal debates, discussions, or advocacy. Learn how to evaluate the significance of a debate topic and make informed decisions about your participation.
🔗 Engage and Support:
Subscribe: Stay updated on our latest videos by subscribing to our channel and hitting the notification bell.
Comment: Share your thoughts, questions, or experiences in the comments below.
Share: Spread awareness by sharing this video with your network and on social media.
📜 Join the Discussion: Become part of our community dedicated to meaningful legal discussions and advocacy. Stay connected and informed as we navigate the complex world of law together.
🏷️ Tags: #MootPoint #LegalDebate #StrategicDecisions #DebateInvitation #LawyerReaction #LegalPriorities #EffectiveAdvocacy #LegalStrategy #FocusOnImportant #DebateTactics #TimeManagement #LawDiscussion #MeaningfulDebates #LegalInsights #ExpertAdvice #ChooseYourBattles #LegalCommunity #LawEducation #LegalEngagement #InformedDecisions #DebateSkills #LegalAnalysis #AvoidingDistractions #LawyerAdvice #LegalTalk #SmartDebating #EngagementTips #LegalWisdom #LawPerspective #EffectiveCommunication #LegalMindset #injuryattorneys #defamation #slander #dickbagpatrol #accidentattorneys ‪@hoyaloya‬ ‪@DeleteLawz1984‬ ‪@CivilianTactical‬ ‪@HerestheDeal‬