There were no vocal overdubs here. This is all Paul. This is what Paul was known for, screaming, hard Rock vocals. The Beatles' remasters got rid of tap hiss.
That's only Paul!! He's known for having a versatile singing voice! 😊😊 This is one of my favourite but there are other examples of what he could do with his voice!
Modern music, including Rap and Hip Hop, would not be the same without the Beatles. They changed the way music and "records" were made. They, and Geoge Martin, developed recording techniques and new combinations of sounds and instruments to evolve music to never before seen levels. All without auto tune or pitch correction!
The "other voice" you hearing in screaming parts are the echo effect they added on the record. But its just paul, maybe some overdubs right and there. The other beatles are doing the harmony parts. Another great vocal performance from Paul is "Ive got a feeling" live from rooftop concert. please check it out
On the lead vocal, it's Paul doubling his lead vocal, plus some vocal effects. Regarding the backing vocals, it's Paul, John, and George doing the backing vocals.
Accept no imitations! 😃 The Beatles remasters don't add anything new to the songs, like vocal stacks or whatnot, they merely bring out what was always already there with extra clarity. Bear in mind that some of us have been listening to The Beatles our entire lives going back to the sixties, so we know every song practically by heart, every fill, every drum hit, every bass line, every vocal tic and so on. And that makes it easy for us to spot an imitation or an outtake or a live version in contrast. If a remaster changed the songs we would know. By the way, Abbey Road is one of the greatest albums of the 20th century. It's full of classic songs any one of which would make for a fine reaction. But also note that the whole second side of the album pretty much flows together as one long song starting from "You Never Give Me Your Money" and ending with "The End", although "Her Majesty", a twenty second hidden track, caps off the medley quite nicely. Tackle it if you will, but good luck figuring out where to pause because it's full of change ups. Maybe listen to that without interruption and then drop in the RUclips interruptions during the edit. But for something more straight forward from that album, check out "Here Comes The Sun" if you haven't already, but go for the album track itself to avoid the distraction from the video. The video is fine, but we didn't have that back when and the song doesn't need it anyway. It's so good it spins its own video in the listeners imagination.
Yes Paul did a lot of screaming, straining his voice back then. Unfortunately, it has taken a toll on his vocal ability. But Paul is my favorite artist, composer, singer of all time! His catalog is so vast and his songs are all so different. Really still in awe of how one person could create that many awesome, catchy, timeless tunes! I just love his music! So many masterpieces! Not to mention..... Paul is just a great guy! Everyone loves him!
The Beatles often double-recorded the lead vocals for the specific effects it creates. The same singer records it twice and the two takes are played back together.
One day, in the 1980s, I went outside to help my mom with some yardwork. I knew a new Wings song was going to be released that day or the next so I left our stereo on, playing the station that would most likely play it first. Eventually, I worked my way so far from the house that all I could hear was the baseline. I had stopped paying much attention. Suddenly, I stopped. I knew Paul's base so well, Even though I knew nothing about the tempo of the new song, I conscious recognized it 15 seconds after really hearing it, and knew it was the new one. Yeah, yeah, yeah! Don't worry, you'll get eventually.🧓🎸🎭💖
You realize that this album, Abby Road is over 50yrs old? It came out in 1969, the day i graduated high school. It was the last album the Beatles did together and in my opinion, it was their greatest!
Paul McCartney said his greatest influence in rock and roll was Little Richard who’s influence can be heard in that scream you backed up at 2:16. (John’s favorite early rocker was Chuck Berry, George’s was Carl Perkins)
Paul is Double Tracked singing with himself. When this recording was made you actually had to sing it more than once yourself listening through headphones. No digital cut and pasting back then . You had to DO IT!
@@bananajr9915 Yes, I know. Abby Road had an Analog ADT which was plagued with problems. But, most studios depended on the manual techniques. EMI installed Telefunken four-track machines in 1959 and 1960, but the Beatles didn't have access to them until 1963. The first 4-track Beatles recording was "I Want to Hold Your Hand" in 1964.
The Beatles did a lot of double tracking of their vocals. It's all over many of their tracks. Curt Cobain did the same thing specifically because the Beatles did it.
This was recorded on a 16 track machine. The Beatles would double track sometimes either live or they would use a technique called ADT, which was basically just taking the first vocal re-recording it with a very, very, very slight delay. There was no pitch correction and there was no vocal stacking like they do today. I don’t even think they had guitar tuners ha ha These guys had it all and by the way Little Richard said there’s only one guy in the whole world. They could sing songs like him and that was Paul McCartney. He loved Paul’s cover of long tall Sally and others. Enjoyed your video.
That is all Paul vocally. The Beatles learned a trick in 1965 using double tracked vocals to fill out the sound and make the voice sound richer. It also allows some cover up of little micro flats or sharps. John Lennon swore by his double tracked (slap back echo, or slight delay) vocals, being uneasy about his own voice.
100% Paul McCartney. This was recorded in the 1960s when the technology was not so good as now. So, the remastering took care of it and made it clearer. Paul sang rock, blues, country, classic etc. He so versatile.
John made the comment that he thinks he should've sang this song. I'm sure it would've been good but I can't imagine it would've been better than Paul's performance here.
All Paul. And remember, autotune hadn't been invented yet. There is video of him arriving at the studio early, just so he could work the vocals and get his voice to just the right rasp and growl.
Two of my all-time favorite artists are the Beatles and Ren/The Big Push (who have busked a few Beatles songs over the years)--and you are one of my favorite reactors to both of them. Puts me in a great mood!
That’s all Paul, he was the most versatile in his voice VS the others. He also practice this song screaming in order to get his voice right to hit this lyrics, he wanted his voice to sound strained when singing it.
Not to take away from Paul's performance, but Robin Gibb sang the heck out of this when performing in the Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band movie with this brothers.
This is the original recording, nothing added, nothing away. Remasters only clean up the sound of the original without changing anything. A re-mixed version is different, in that they actually change the original version. This is what came out in 1969, and the vocal ia all Paul McCartney.
Think it was a 2 or 3 track vocal layer of Paul. Sounds like him singing with and then without distortion in the chorus. I might be wrong. Maybe John and/or George are the backup.
Double tracked lead vocals both paul. Slap back echo. 3 part backing vocals paul, john, george. Any remasters were simply cleanup, fatten vocals, pan differently, or no pan (imitating mono but leaving stereo). No other vocals were ever allowed to be put onto anything they did. Everything was as recorded originally. The Beatles put out stereo and mono versions on everything. Some stereo remasters kept the hard panning the Beatles often did, and some like I said more centered everything to keep it stereo but make it more along the lines of, say, their mono versions. The Beatles are sacrosanct. No one would be allowed to mess much with their shit. I was around then. I bought the record when it first came out. That was paul singing another track...doubling his vocal...as recorded originally. They did that a lot. This was before voice doubling technology came along, though they DID do some of that when it DID come along, but more often than not they preferred to double record themselves singing against their own voice.
Here's the scoop my man. Beatles remasters from 2009 even the remixes from 2017 thru now which sound incredible are in no way tampered with. These are the original version's. There are no stacked voices or whatever else you were hearing here. With technology now they can center the vocals now and the instruments brought forward. Original Beatles pressings Paul's bass and Ringo's drumming are kinda buried in the background. Now we can bring them to the front. This was recorded in 1969 on an eight track board. I believe all The Beatles had until "The White Album" in 1968 were recorded on 4 track, that's all they had up to then. Here's what you want now, anything you do starting with the 1966 Lp "Revolver", 1967 Sgt Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band" Lp, 1968 "White Album", 1969 "Let It Be" and 1969 "Abbey Road" you want the 2017 thru 2022 remixes, they sound incredible. Forget the 2009 remasters. To confuse you a little further, in November, 2023 they released "The Beatles 1962-1966" and "The Beatles 1967- 1970" Lp's remixed. These were compilation double Lp's released in 1974. The new remixes both have a lot of bonus tracks on them and they sound incredible. This song is a bonus track on the 67-70 Lp. The only problem I have with 67-70 is aside from the singles and a few tracks from "Magical Mystery Tour" which for some reason hasn't been remixed yet, the majority of the tracks are just the remixes of the Lp's from 2017 to 2022. You want your mind blown? Go to the 1967-70 remix and listen to the single Lennon's "Strawberry Fields Forever", it will blow you away, sounds as weird and wonderful today as it did 57 years ago in 1967 when this song came over the radio. John was in his LSD faze on this one, it's incredible. Then the B-side, Paul's "Penny Lane" incredible! This is still widely regarded as the greatest single in the history of recorded music. These two songs are a great example of how diverse this band was. Also on the bonus disc on "Revolver" their 1966 single, Paul's "Paperback Writer" and John's "Rain". "Rain" is a "Must Listen". The first Beatles recording after John and George started taking LSD. Paul and Ringo weren't on board yet. This song has so many studio recording first's on it in history. The first backwards vocals and music on the outro at the end, it's really cool. Ringo's drumming is off the charts along with Paul's bass and John and George's heavy guitars sounds incredible. Remember now the 2022 remix of these. No one was making music like this in April, 1966. Then their August,1966 release of their "Revolver" was incredible. This Lp is one of the all time greats, check it out. Now on "Oh Darling" Paul got that raspy vocal by coming in an hour early or more for 5 days straight and belted it out on the piano until on that 5th day he was happy with it. That's what you call dedication to your craft. What you hear on that record is Paul's voice straight up, no BS enhancements. Also from "Abbey Road" must listens are John's "Come Together" George's "Something" which Billy Preston plays organ on. John's "I Want You (She's So Heavy)" which Billy Preston plays some incredible organ on and George's "Here Comes The Sun" which is The Beatles most played song on Spotify with as of August 2021 over 700 million plays and from what I hear around 900 million now. The remix of this also has a very nice video with it. This one should be kind of a must for you. Sorry for the long post but I've been a Beatles but since 1964. They are simply the greatest, most diverse and influential band in the history of recorded music and it ain't even close! The only other artist I would put up there on Beatles level would be Bob Dylan, the greatest American songwriter and poet of the 20th century. Hope this info is helpful for you. Peace ❤😢
Listen all the way through man...?! There are not many covers of this Beatles original song written and sung solo by Paul McCartney. There are no support lead vocals IT IS ALL PAUL!!!
@@Neighborhood_spdrman, no that is not what I am saying. I realize that he has to make some stops. He’s a reaction guy, I get that. But I’ve seen hundreds of them and this reactor is particularly prone to it, I would say excessively so. That’s all…just ease up on them. Maybe instead of 8 - 10 stops per song, how about 6? That sort of thing. That’s what I mean by “ease up”.
I wish you would not pause so much, only to nitpick at things or to ask if it's Paul doing all the lead vocals. OF COURSE IT IS! If you'd looked it up beforehand, you'd know that. Instead you choose to comment on things that explain themselves. Otherwise, you nitpick over the obvious, and it's really ****ing irritating. You are far from the best reactor.
@@keithbrown7685 if not being the best reactor got me to 100k subs then I'm doing fine bro! Most decent reactor do look up songs before they react. That's not my style, I'm come in fresh with questions like a student. Cause this is a communal channel
Sorry, I like a lot of the songs you play but I can’t deal with more than one stop, let alone a dozen stops. That’s no way to listen to a song. I wish I could subscribe but I know that it will be too annoying. No offense intended, just the honest truth.
It’s a reaction channel. If you want uninterrupted, why not just listen to the song? I’ve never understood comments like this. I find the best comments to be the ones that come in the moment.
That's all Paul. He wasn't called the man of a thousand voices for nothing. And the best rock voice to me.
ABSOLUTELY!!!
AGREED 👍👍👍👍
It’s 100% Paul.
This is the original
100 percent Paul. And it is the original song.
Yes, “all Paul!!!”
You can never go wrong with the Beatles. They had something for everyone.
The lead vocal is all Paul McCartney. He came to the studio before the others to work up his vocals for this song. He also plays a mean Bass guitar!
I’m pretty sure that’s George on bass
This is the official version. Glad you liked it
There were no vocal overdubs here. This is all Paul. This is what Paul was known for, screaming, hard Rock vocals. The Beatles' remasters got rid of tap hiss.
sounds like reverb.
@@Kieop A little tape echo. Nothing that wasn't on the recording in 1969.
@@Kieopbe double tracked it and spent a few days practising because the vocal was so aggressive.
@@debjorgo he def is using some echo and double track here and there
@@debjorgohe double tracks in the middle and uses echo at times
It's all Paul, my friend 😊
Paul spent a week in the studio roughing up his voice to his satisfaction beforehand. Had he not, his voice, in his opinion would have been to smooth.
Paul McCartney had an extremely versatile voice . Soul , rock , pop , blues , he could sing all of it
That's only Paul!! He's known for having a versatile singing voice! 😊😊 This is one of my favourite but there are other examples of what he could do with his voice!
yep its Paul
Modern music, including Rap and Hip Hop, would not be the same without the Beatles. They changed the way music and "records" were made. They, and Geoge Martin, developed recording techniques and new combinations of sounds and instruments to evolve music to never before seen levels. All without auto tune or pitch correction!
The Beatles had no Influence on HipHop
@@MugnifyRTS You don't know the Beatles or any much of their records at all....
The "other voice" you hearing in screaming parts are the echo effect they added on the record. But its just paul, maybe some overdubs right and there. The other beatles are doing the harmony parts.
Another great vocal performance from Paul is "Ive got a feeling" live from rooftop concert. please check it out
On the lead vocal, it's Paul doubling his lead vocal, plus some vocal effects. Regarding the backing vocals, it's Paul, John, and George doing the backing vocals.
Accept no imitations! 😃 The Beatles remasters don't add anything new to the songs, like vocal stacks or whatnot, they merely bring out what was always already there with extra clarity. Bear in mind that some of us have been listening to The Beatles our entire lives going back to the sixties, so we know every song practically by heart, every fill, every drum hit, every bass line, every vocal tic and so on. And that makes it easy for us to spot an imitation or an outtake or a live version in contrast. If a remaster changed the songs we would know. By the way, Abbey Road is one of the greatest albums of the 20th century. It's full of classic songs any one of which would make for a fine reaction. But also note that the whole second side of the album pretty much flows together as one long song starting from "You Never Give Me Your Money" and ending with "The End", although "Her Majesty", a twenty second hidden track, caps off the medley quite nicely. Tackle it if you will, but good luck figuring out where to pause because it's full of change ups. Maybe listen to that without interruption and then drop in the RUclips interruptions during the edit. But for something more straight forward from that album, check out "Here Comes The Sun" if you haven't already, but go for the album track itself to avoid the distraction from the video. The video is fine, but we didn't have that back when and the song doesn't need it anyway. It's so good it spins its own video in the listeners imagination.
I listen on vinyl and the backing vocals are higher in the mix - I love analogue. :)
@@mikecaetano you are💯 Correct. No fing remastered crap. Stop 🤨
Yes Paul did a lot of screaming, straining his voice back then. Unfortunately, it has taken a toll on his vocal ability. But Paul is my favorite artist, composer, singer of all time! His catalog is so vast and his songs are all so different. Really still in awe of how one person could create that many awesome, catchy, timeless tunes! I just love his music! So many masterpieces! Not to mention..... Paul is just a great guy! Everyone loves him!
The Beatles often double-recorded the lead vocals for the specific effects it creates. The same singer records it twice and the two takes are played back together.
One day, in the 1980s, I went outside to help my mom with some yardwork. I knew a new Wings song was going to be released that day or the next so I left our stereo on, playing the station that would most likely play it first. Eventually, I worked my way so far from the house that all I could hear was the baseline. I had stopped paying much attention. Suddenly, I stopped. I knew Paul's base so well, Even though I knew nothing about the tempo of the new song, I conscious recognized it 15 seconds after really hearing it, and knew it was the new one.
Yeah, yeah, yeah!
Don't worry, you'll get eventually.🧓🎸🎭💖
You realize that this album, Abby Road is over 50yrs old? It came out in 1969, the day i graduated high school. It was the last album the Beatles did together and in my opinion, it was their greatest!
Paul McCartney said his greatest influence in rock and roll was Little Richard who’s influence can be heard in that scream you backed up at 2:16. (John’s favorite early rocker was Chuck Berry, George’s was Carl Perkins)
Paul is Double Tracked singing with himself. When this recording was made you actually had to sing it more than once yourself listening through headphones. No digital cut and pasting back then . You had to DO IT!
@@larryfried7742 actually the Beatles were the first to use ADT (Automatic Double Tracking) a few years prior to this
@@bananajr9915 Yes, I know. Abby Road had an Analog ADT which was plagued with problems. But, most studios depended on the manual techniques. EMI installed Telefunken four-track machines in 1959 and 1960, but the Beatles didn't have access to them until 1963. The first 4-track Beatles recording was "I Want to Hold Your Hand" in 1964.
@@larryfried7742 ahh okay 👍
Paul: BEST R and R screamer of all time. Hey, check out his Kansas City.
This will knock your socks off! 😎
As a boomer, oh yes to this day!
Paul could sing rough and ready as well as Lennon.
A master class in cord shredding.
And chord shredding.
The first one wasn't a cover. It was Paul siging live with his new band when he was older.
How do you know?
He’s right. The first version was a live version. Second was album.
@@mjj2311he can woohoo and do it all live just as well
Now I got to hear Maxwell's hammer it's the next song on the album I think
It's the same I grew up on remastered it didn't matter
It's already been said, all Paul and this is the original version. The remaster has not "added" anything, only enhanced what was already there.
The Beatles did a lot of double tracking of their vocals. It's all over many of their tracks.
Curt Cobain did the same thing specifically because the Beatles did it.
This was recorded on a 16 track machine. The Beatles would double track sometimes either live or they would use a technique called ADT, which was basically just taking the first vocal re-recording it with a very, very, very slight delay. There was no pitch correction and there was no vocal stacking like they do today. I don’t even think they had guitar tuners ha ha
These guys had it all and by the way Little Richard said there’s only one guy in the whole world. They could sing songs like him and that was Paul McCartney. He loved Paul’s cover of long tall Sally and others. Enjoyed your video.
Paul McCartney's greatest vocal of all time on the greatest rock album of all time.
Great Stuff Mugs!
That is all Paul vocally. The Beatles learned a trick in 1965 using double tracked vocals to fill out the sound and make the voice sound richer. It also allows some cover up of little micro flats or sharps. John Lennon swore by his double tracked (slap back echo, or slight delay) vocals, being uneasy about his own voice.
The other Beatles do back him with the "ooohs and ahhhhhhs" at the end.
Ringo is killing it
RIngo has said that he never made a mistake, and I think it's true.
This is also mccartney trying to do his version of some r&b blues music called ‘swamp music’
In the early sixties when paul sang ooo all the girls fainted
He double tracked the vocal.
The harmonies are great and George Harrison on bass sounds like Paul McCartney playing bass.
Great tune.
100% Paul McCartney. This was recorded in the 1960s when the technology was not so good as now. So, the remastering took care of it and made it clearer.
Paul sang rock, blues, country, classic etc. He so versatile.
John made the comment that he thinks he should've sang this song. I'm sure it would've been good but I can't imagine it would've been better than Paul's performance here.
All Paul. And remember, autotune hadn't been invented yet. There is video of him arriving at the studio early, just so he could work the vocals and get his voice to just the right rasp and growl.
Two of my all-time favorite artists are the Beatles and Ren/The Big Push (who have busked a few Beatles songs over the years)--and you are one of my favorite reactors to both of them. Puts me in a great mood!
It's all Paul's vocals.
That’s all Paul, he was the most versatile in his voice VS the others. He also practice this song screaming in order to get his voice right to hit this lyrics, he wanted his voice to sound strained when singing it.
Little Richard oooo,ooooh!
Not to take away from Paul's performance, but Robin Gibb sang the heck out of this when performing in the Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band movie with this brothers.
Paul sometimes channeled some Little Richard.
Definitely the original here
It's ALL PAUL
I always thought that Paul double-tracked parts of this vocal. The Beatles, and others, did it very often to get a fuller sound.
That was all Paul
This is the original recording, nothing added, nothing away. Remasters only clean up the sound of the original without changing anything. A re-mixed version is different, in that they actually change the original version. This is what came out in 1969, and the vocal ia all Paul McCartney.
Pauls rock voice -Try Helter Skelter, Johns rock voice, twist and shout, revolution
@@Eskay1206 One of his early ones Little Richards Long Tall Sally
You can see now why we had our say about that other version. Nothing like the original
One of my favorites…….
Think it was a 2 or 3 track vocal layer of Paul. Sounds like him singing with and then without distortion in the chorus. I might be wrong. Maybe John and/or George are the backup.
🌻♥️
Double tracked lead vocals both paul. Slap back echo. 3 part backing vocals paul, john, george. Any remasters were simply cleanup, fatten vocals, pan differently, or no pan (imitating mono but leaving stereo). No other vocals were ever allowed to be put onto anything they did. Everything was as recorded originally. The Beatles put out stereo and mono versions on everything. Some stereo remasters kept the hard panning the Beatles often did, and some like I said more centered everything to keep it stereo but make it more along the lines of, say, their mono versions. The Beatles are sacrosanct. No one would be allowed to mess much with their shit. I was around then. I bought the record when it first came out. That was paul singing another track...doubling his vocal...as recorded originally. They did that a lot. This was before voice doubling technology came along, though they DID do some of that when it DID come along, but more often than not they preferred to double record themselves singing against their own voice.
1000 stops on the man with the 1000 voices... 😢😢😢
you stop it WAY TOO much. it really breaks up the feel. they added nothing, it's the same recording.
My feel and your feel are two different feels 😂
There's no support vocals that's ALL PAUL McCARTNEY!
Here's the scoop my man. Beatles remasters from 2009 even the remixes from 2017 thru now which sound incredible are in no way tampered with.
These are the original version's. There are no stacked voices or whatever else you were hearing here. With technology now they can center the vocals now and the instruments brought forward. Original Beatles pressings Paul's bass and Ringo's drumming are kinda buried in the background. Now we can bring them to the front. This was recorded in 1969 on an eight track board.
I believe all The Beatles had until "The White Album" in 1968 were recorded on 4 track, that's all they had up to then.
Here's what you want now, anything you do starting with the 1966 Lp "Revolver", 1967 Sgt Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band" Lp, 1968 "White Album", 1969 "Let It Be" and 1969 "Abbey Road" you want the 2017 thru 2022 remixes, they sound incredible. Forget the 2009 remasters.
To confuse you a little further, in November, 2023 they released "The Beatles 1962-1966" and "The Beatles 1967- 1970" Lp's remixed. These were compilation double Lp's released in 1974.
The new remixes both have a lot of bonus tracks on them and they sound incredible. This song is a bonus track on the 67-70 Lp. The only problem I have with 67-70 is aside from the singles and a few tracks from "Magical Mystery Tour" which for some reason hasn't been remixed yet, the majority of the tracks are just the remixes of the Lp's from 2017 to 2022. You want your mind blown?
Go to the 1967-70 remix and listen to the single Lennon's "Strawberry Fields Forever", it will blow you away, sounds as weird and wonderful today as it did 57 years ago in 1967 when this song came over the radio. John was in his LSD faze on this one, it's incredible. Then the B-side, Paul's "Penny Lane" incredible!
This is still widely regarded as the greatest single in the history of recorded music. These two songs are a great example of how diverse this band was. Also on the bonus disc on "Revolver" their 1966 single, Paul's "Paperback Writer" and John's "Rain".
"Rain" is a "Must Listen". The first Beatles recording after John and George started taking LSD. Paul and Ringo weren't on board yet. This song has so many studio recording first's on it in history. The first backwards vocals and music on the outro at the end, it's really cool. Ringo's drumming is off the charts along with Paul's bass and John and George's heavy guitars sounds incredible. Remember now the 2022 remix of these.
No one was making music like this in April, 1966. Then their August,1966 release of their "Revolver" was incredible. This Lp is one of the all time greats, check it out.
Now on "Oh Darling" Paul got that raspy vocal by coming in an hour early or more for 5 days straight and belted it out on the piano until on that 5th day he was happy with it. That's what you call dedication to your craft. What you hear on that record is Paul's voice straight up, no BS enhancements.
Also from "Abbey Road" must listens are John's "Come Together" George's "Something" which Billy Preston plays organ on. John's "I Want You (She's So Heavy)" which Billy Preston plays some incredible organ on and George's "Here Comes The Sun" which is The Beatles most played song on Spotify with as of August 2021 over 700 million plays and from what I hear around 900 million now. The remix of this also has a very nice video with it.
This one should be kind of a must for you. Sorry for the long post but I've been a Beatles but since 1964. They are simply the greatest, most diverse and influential band in the history of recorded music and it ain't even close! The only other artist I would put up there on Beatles level would be Bob Dylan, the greatest American songwriter and poet of the 20th century. Hope this info is helpful for you.
Peace ❤😢
Listen all the way through man...?! There are not many covers of this Beatles original song written and sung solo by Paul McCartney. There are no support lead vocals IT IS ALL PAUL!!!
Ease up on the stops, please!
Thats not the way I react Mikey
It’s a reaction my guy. He’s commenting on the song. You wanna just listen to the song put the vinyl on lol
@@Neighborhood_spdrman, no that is not what I am saying. I realize that he has to make some stops. He’s a reaction guy, I get that. But I’ve seen hundreds of them and this reactor is particularly prone to it, I would say excessively so. That’s all…just ease up on them. Maybe instead of 8 - 10 stops per song, how about 6? That sort of thing. That’s what I mean by “ease up”.
Was it all Paul. The solo voice never changed. We are not talking about background harmony. Why would it not be Paul. That makes no sence.
Shifting voice doesnt mean different voice. Don't put Paul in a box. That's kind of dumb.
I wish you would not pause so much, only to nitpick at things or to ask if it's Paul doing all the lead vocals. OF COURSE IT IS! If you'd looked it up beforehand, you'd know that. Instead you choose to comment on things that explain themselves. Otherwise, you nitpick over the obvious, and it's really ****ing irritating.
You are far from the best reactor.
@@keithbrown7685 if not being the best reactor got me to 100k subs then I'm doing fine bro!
Most decent reactor do look up songs before they react. That's not my style, I'm come in fresh with questions like a student. Cause this is a communal channel
Why do you have that blue in your mouth? I stop watching because of that.
Sorry, I like a lot of the songs you play but I can’t deal with more than one stop, let alone a dozen stops. That’s no way to listen to a song. I wish I could subscribe but I know that it will be too annoying. No offense intended, just the honest truth.
none taken. we all have different ways we digest music
It’s a reaction channel. If you want uninterrupted, why not just listen to the song? I’ve never understood comments like this. I find the best comments to be the ones that come in the moment.
This isn't Paul, it's a man named William Campbell.