Buy the CANON RF 70-200 f/4 | a enthusiast prospective.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 17

  • @seanmuller5145
    @seanmuller5145 Год назад +3

    I have to laugh. I just bought the F4 friggin yesterday, about 24 hour ago actually. Now out of the blue your video came up.
    In Canada the f2.8 version is $3300 and the F4 is $1900 as of June 12 2023. You save $1400 dollars.
    This 70-200 F4 is about the same size of my 24-105mm f4.
    I think with these new Cameras coming out F4 is good for most of your work.
    My R6 mark2 can handle hi ISO like 16000- 25,000 so F4 works like a F2.8 on a DSLR.
    Thanks for the video.

    • @iknownothing610
      @iknownothing610  Год назад +1

      Dang, I feel bad for you Canadians. Those price are terrible. I got an R5 so I try to stay below 6400 ISO. It could handle more but no need really. I agree you really don't need the 2.8 for the 70-200 range when you can bump the ISO. If you really need to blow out a background I think it is better to use a prime lens anyway. Something like a 85mm 1.8 or 1.4. I actually just bought the EF100mm macro for scanning film and that thing would make a good portrait lens too.

    • @williamgollatz1911
      @williamgollatz1911 11 месяцев назад

      I'm gonna disagree about handling the that high iso. At that high iso - dynamic range at 25600 is almost half of iso 400 (photons to photos). For me anyway where my subjects with be martial artists wearing black and not blowing out the background.

  • @TaleskiC
    @TaleskiC Год назад +1

    I have been going back and fourth and stressing over this decision for weeks. I wish I had saw your video weeks ago, you helped me make my decision easily. You are right love love love this lens do not miss 2.8 aperture at all. Thankyou for taking the time to make this video.

  • @dbenedict357
    @dbenedict357 Год назад

    Thanks man! I have owned R6 a little over a year… didn’t find out about the f/4 70-200 until last week.. I have been contemplating getting it because currently I am using a Tamron EF G2 70-200 f/2.8..

  • @zimbolenz
    @zimbolenz Год назад

    Lol you had me dying at look at me don’t do it ! 😅

  • @burt101welly6
    @burt101welly6 Год назад

    Thanks for the review,was looking at the sigma 2.8 ,is it just the weight that’s a downer , as over here it’s about 300 bucks cheaper than the f4 canon ,and about 4500 to 5000 for the canon
    F2.8

    • @iknownothing610
      @iknownothing610  Год назад

      Just the weight and size really. I think its equally as sharp as the canon.

  • @TMVVisualMedia
    @TMVVisualMedia Год назад +2

    It's still an L-series lens. Premium.
    Thanks for the video.

  • @Hidden_____ask012
    @Hidden_____ask012 7 месяцев назад

    Hey u still like the f4 is it worthy for r8…?

  • @williamgollatz1911
    @williamgollatz1911 11 месяцев назад

    Still not decided. I like to do non-paid amateur indoor sports/martial arts shooting

  • @Mikedegot
    @Mikedegot Год назад

    I got the F4, I ain't got nobody to impress.

  • @richardbarclay9095
    @richardbarclay9095 Год назад

    Such a great review :)

  • @Brianmc2134
    @Brianmc2134 Год назад

    I'M SOLD lol! bringing it along for an iceland trip

    • @iknownothing610
      @iknownothing610  Год назад

      Nice, Have not been to Iceland yet but the 70-200 is gonna be great for them tight landscape shots at 5.6 or f8 ;)

  • @gloriamdeo749
    @gloriamdeo749 Год назад

    you should make more informative videos like this👍🏽