The Most Terrifying Weapon the Nazis Feared

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 325

  • @brianhalberg131
    @brianhalberg131 Год назад +204

    A story on flamethrowers without much about them. Still, a good, albeit brief telling of Veritable and Blockbuster. My father fought through these operations (and more) as part of Canadian 1st Army. All the way from Normandy to Kleve. Among the souvenirs he brought home was my mother. That generation was tough. They (Mom and Dad) survived some of the worst that the 20th century had to offer, and when it was done, they simply went about their lives. No fanfare, no seeking fame or recognition. We could could use major helpings of their generation's strength right now.

    • @DavyRo
      @DavyRo Год назад +10

      The Canadian forces alongside their British allies were an unbelievable courageous fighting force. I know how much the British admired & thought the world of the men they fought alongside. What's a little annoying for we British is the fact the country that portrays itself above all others of being victorious in WW2. Did the least amount of fighting in the ground war. Where the fighting was it's most brutal. Canadian forces came in to the war right at the very start also. These things aren't & won't ever be forgotten. Like you said it was amazing these men just went back into civilian life with no fuss. Despite being the heroes that they were

    • @brianhalberg131
      @brianhalberg131 Год назад +4

      @@DavyRoI can't comment on the level of risk or courage of the British in WWII, but they were key to Canadian 1st Army. Canadian 1st Army was a unique fighting force comprised of Canadian, British, Polish, Belgian, Dutch, Czech and at times American troops.

    • @blackcountryme
      @blackcountryme Год назад +9

      That generation fought the greatest evil the world had seen at the time, came home and went to work in factories and offices... no song and dance.. just dusted off their hands and got on with it...

    • @martyn8116
      @martyn8116 Год назад +7

      @@DavyRo Exactly the same with the Aussies and Kiwis. They declared war on the Axis Powers with UK. A million Aussies served overseas in the military during WW2, out of a pop of 7 million. Kiwis, 140,000 out of 1.6 million.
      What a generation.

    • @scrappydoo7887
      @scrappydoo7887 Год назад +7

      ​@@martyn8116yes! The Aussies and kiwis are outstanding fighting men too from basically every account I've seen them in.

  • @silentblackhole
    @silentblackhole 11 месяцев назад +12

    They truely are "The Greatest Generation". I have so much respect for them. I only wish they would have know how much they are appreciated. It probably would have looked like that in the 60s, 70s and 90s. I feel like only now with the internet do we actually have the opportunity to SEE and really learn what happened.
    Thank you to all the heroes that setup a bright future for all. Let us not waste it.

  • @michaeldebellis4202
    @michaeldebellis4202 11 месяцев назад +16

    One thing that made the Crocodile stand out compared to other flame tanks is other flame tanks replace their main gun with the flame thrower. The Crocodile kept its main gun and used one of the machine gun ports for the flame thrower. That really made it a formidable weapon capable of destroying entrenched positions with cannon and flame thrower. Lindy Beige has a great video on the Crocodile. He also thinks it was one of the best weapons the British had and has interesting statistics and stories about how they were used.

  • @seanmaier4941
    @seanmaier4941 Год назад +41

    My great grandfather was a tanker in that battle, 2nd Canadian Armored Division

    • @bradtaylor4596
      @bradtaylor4596 Год назад

      There wasn’t a 2nd Canadian Armoured Division. There was the 2nd Canadian Infantry Division. The only Armoured divisions the Canadians deployed were the 4th (part of the II corps) and the 5th (part of the I corps - fought mainly in Italy)
      It is possible he fought in an armoured battalion attached to the 2nd Division, if that was the correct division.
      Do you know the regiment by chance?

    • @seanmaier4941
      @seanmaier4941 Год назад +5

      @@bradtaylor4596 All I know is that he was originally part of the 16th infantry brigade, 8th division, of no. 26 company, before being moved to the 2nd Canadian division. I assumed it was a armored division due to him being put in command of a firefly tank (have some old pictures and a few paintings he made in Holland) and fighting in the battle of scheldt in one.

  • @chrislong3938
    @chrislong3938 Год назад +18

    My father-in-law was a Marine in the Pacific. He was a TC on a Sherman. He and I used to sit up late at night with him bullshitting about our times in the Service.
    I once asked him about the flamethrower Shermans. He said they were almost more afraid of the guys who rode and operated on those things!
    They all thought they were all lunatics and when eating chow in the field or whatever, they would always be off by themselves.
    He said a lot of the tanks leaked fuel everywhere and they really stunk up the place!
    Ahh, I miss ya George!

    • @mustang1912
      @mustang1912 Год назад

      Germans wanted to fight a war properly using tanks and Americans just wanted to use infantry and kill people. This is why Germany never bothered to fight battles.

  • @michaelwicks7680
    @michaelwicks7680 Год назад +20

    I don't think the Germans could call upon "reserves" most of Germany had been stripped of fighting men to feed the meat grinder on the eastern front 😮

    • @OpenCarryUSMC
      @OpenCarryUSMC Год назад

      Reserve forces not reservists. Big difference. You have to have reserve units in waiting.

    • @dannybryant6873
      @dannybryant6873 5 месяцев назад

      Battle of the Bludge is where they really pissed away their reserves.
      Even knowing that the Russians were coming (and not happy)

  • @SteveBueche1027
    @SteveBueche1027 Год назад +57

    I would think all soldiers fear the flame thrower.

    • @escos0410
      @escos0410 Год назад +2

      Definitely not a good way to go is it
      The 5 years that the world was just carnage must have been 😳
      I know this is line of script from a ww2 film (fury) but it haunts me for some reason as it’s true
      Wait till you see it
      See what?
      What a man can do to another man
      Normal everyday men thrown in with no option or choice on the front line
      For it all to end and go back to normal peaceful lives
      Look at the generation now, god if it or when it happens

    • @railgap
      @railgap Год назад

      Yeah, the banning of flame weapons by international convention(s) was probably just old maids being fussy. After all, how bad could it really be to be BURNED ALIVE?

    • @martyn8116
      @martyn8116 Год назад +6

      @@escos0410 Yes, it does make you think. My great uncle (Grandmother's younger brother) fought in Sicily & Italian mainland. The only thing he ever said was that there was a lot of cowardice.
      Since reading about the Italian campaign, it was a hard grind fighting against German defensive positions. When one was taken, the Germans fell back to the next prepared position.
      His family received a letter saying he was MIA in 1944. Heard nothing more until he walked into the kitchen in 1946 and gave his mother the shock of her life. He'd been taken POW.

    • @jamesfowley4114
      @jamesfowley4114 Год назад +3

      Even the guys operating them were extra careful. They exploded easily if danaged.

  • @nobody-ly9ef
    @nobody-ly9ef Год назад +57

    Its hard to imagine the sheer horror of a flamethrower tank attacking your position......they should have called it the dragon

    • @davidkoehler136
      @davidkoehler136 Год назад

      the Flammenwerfer was a German invention first used in 1916 at Verdon and plans included using it in armor as far back . No solder wants to be on the receiving end of it. Remember this is British propaganda

    • @tommyvarcity2783
      @tommyvarcity2783 Год назад +2

      They called the ones who didn’t make it crispy critters 😂

    • @jamesocker5235
      @jamesocker5235 Год назад

      Listen to the atlantic wall defenders that Mark felton did it must gave been terrify in those bunkers

    • @leger205
      @leger205 10 месяцев назад +1

      the dragon's breath

  • @blazerocker1734
    @blazerocker1734 Год назад +33

    After more than seven minutes of video he finally gets to the part about the flame thrower.
    Dark Docs up to their same old tricks.

    • @jamesburns2232
      @jamesburns2232 10 месяцев назад +1

      👍🔥🪃

    • @nickpiludu137
      @nickpiludu137 7 месяцев назад +1

      He builds up the stories well, much better than most.

    • @John14-6...
      @John14-6... 4 месяца назад +1

      Thanks for the info so I didn't have to waste time

  • @OrDuckVet
    @OrDuckVet Год назад +12

    I’ve really enjoyed your content, but I agree with many of the most critical comments here. The title is misleading and has little to nothing to do with the majority of the content of this video.

  • @HubertofLiege
    @HubertofLiege Год назад +6

    “We gonna smoke you out!”
    “We’re in a tight spot”

  • @LeveretteJamesClifford1955
    @LeveretteJamesClifford1955 Год назад +3

    The Germans had them too, and planted stationary flame throwers close to bunkers in Normandy and happily, the pre bombardments severed their fuel lines.

  • @amadeusamwater
    @amadeusamwater Год назад +27

    A 1000 gun barrage sounds like a lot until you realize that many Soviet barrages were several times bigger than that.

    • @seanbigay1042
      @seanbigay1042 Год назад +6

      A 1000-gun barrage IS a lot. The concise and sober technical description of a Soviet barrage is OH SHIT!

    • @amadeusamwater
      @amadeusamwater Год назад

      That sounds about right.@@seanbigay1042

    • @robotorch
      @robotorch Год назад

      @@seanbigay1042The Seelow Heights barrage, while impressive on paper, did nothing because the Germans had already evacuated the forward lines

    • @seanbigay1042
      @seanbigay1042 Год назад

      @@robotorch Hm ... Come to think of it, the Soviets tried to use one of their humungous barrages to kill Simo Hayha, the sniper they called The White Death ... It didn't work.

    • @Snakebloke
      @Snakebloke 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@seanbigay1042 Yeah well using a machine gun is pointless, if you're trying to hit a needle in a haystack...
      ...but if you're goal is to hit the haystack and set it on fire? :D

  • @macdodd
    @macdodd Год назад +3

    I used to live around that area & visited these towns on several occasions.

    • @simon_wink
      @simon_wink 11 месяцев назад

      Oh, noch jemand vom Niederrhein? :)

  • @Whipkick2
    @Whipkick2 Год назад +10

    Would have been good to have some maps, to show the locations etc.

    • @Peter-Du
      @Peter-Du Год назад

      This is about drama. Not about tactics, strategy , logistics Etc. Nevermind "The weapon that made the Nazis panic" (For entertainment purposes' only).

  • @danielanderson6360
    @danielanderson6360 Год назад +1

    I bet Canadian Artillery guys be like "Soory" after every artillery shell they fire.

  • @alfnoakes392
    @alfnoakes392 Год назад +3

    For a thorough description of the use etc of tank-flamethrowers I recommend Lindybeige The Most Effective Weapon of World War Two. Excellent video, as are all Lindybeige offerings (I also recommend The Last Charge of the Calcutta Light Horse).

  • @ChetJang
    @ChetJang 6 месяцев назад +1

    Where were the flamethrowers only briefly mentioned? They were a two-edged sword. They were greatly feared and thus intensely targeted. Many had their flamethrowers blow up on their backs. Nobody wanted to be the person carrying the flamethrower because of the extreme danger.

  • @FDR_progressive_liberal
    @FDR_progressive_liberal Год назад +1

    I'm flummoxed that I have never heard of Operation Veritable. And I am a WWII buff.

  • @grapeshot
    @grapeshot Год назад +9

    They say the Germans we're not big fans of the 50 caliber machine gun neither. I saw how it was putting in work in the movie Fury.

    • @Great_Sandwich
      @Great_Sandwich Год назад +2

      So you saw how it was working in a Hollywood film, did you? Did it trigger the PTSD you got from playing Call of Duty?

    • @grapeshot
      @grapeshot Год назад +3

      @Great_Sandwich first of all what are you even talking about it was a movie people watch movies and no I don't even like Call of Duty.

    • @grapeshot
      @grapeshot Год назад +4

      @@Great_Sandwich so how are things down in your mom's basement dweller

    • @buiItnotbought
      @buiItnotbought Год назад

      They had the mg42 which was pretty great

    • @grapeshot
      @grapeshot Год назад

      @Great_Sandwich oh yeah I've seen them working in real life cutting down trees

  • @harcovanhees394
    @harcovanhees394 Год назад +7

    Nice ! @9:18 A Panzer 1 passing a “Belgian gate”. Must been may 1940

  • @JoesWebPresence
    @JoesWebPresence Год назад +2

    @0:25 " . . over a thousand artillery . . aimed directy at the enemy."
    Indirectly.

  • @stephanarizona9094
    @stephanarizona9094 Год назад +12

    Though movies depict flame throwers exploding when hit, the firearms channel Forgotten Weapons kind of debunks that and shows they were made with self sealing bladders so if struct by small arms fire a flame thrower would not explode, only if hit with an artillery shell or something to rupture the fuel bladder was there a risk of a explosive event.

    • @jimmyrustler8983
      @jimmyrustler8983 Год назад +1

      The pack straps for the tanks were fitted with quick detach buckles too, so the operator can take it off in a hurry.

  • @RayTorres-t3u
    @RayTorres-t3u 10 месяцев назад +1

    Germans thought they were going against 🔥🐲 fire-breathing, swimming tank monsters

  • @jerombajames9679
    @jerombajames9679 10 месяцев назад +1

    It is awesome you spent unbelivable 30 seconds of 10 minutes long video on description of that most terrifying weapon the nazis feared. Another great part is that they used it in WW1 already so it was completely unknown to them. Soldiers from other armies probably didn't fear it as Nazis, most probably because it was special antinazi flamethrower shooting stars and stripes.

  • @jimpool7780
    @jimpool7780 Год назад +2

    Germans used them against French and British during World War One, and against the Soviet Army during WW 2?

  • @jasonalmendra3823
    @jasonalmendra3823 Год назад +2

    They did not see that coming.

  • @marwerno
    @marwerno 5 месяцев назад +1

    7 Minutes in, and still no weapon that was special or "feared" more by the Germans than any other. BTW: NOt all Germans where Nazis and not all Nazis where soldiers...German Soldiers of WW2 would have been more accurate.

  • @brucermarino
    @brucermarino 4 месяца назад

    Another Shadow and an accurate presentation.

  • @mrhassell
    @mrhassell Год назад +2

    Panzerkampfwagen, "tank" or "armoured combat vehicle". The modern commonly used synonym is Kampfpanzer, or "battle PANZER". NOT - "Ponzer", which belongs to "Ponzi scheme".

  • @tonygagey
    @tonygagey Год назад +1

    Two crews that very rarely get taken prisoner. Snipers and flame thrower crews

  • @MothaLuva
    @MothaLuva Год назад +9

    If the Nazis „totally panicked“, why did it took the Allies almost a year to get from the Normandy beaches to Berlin.

    • @JDDC-tq7qm
      @JDDC-tq7qm Год назад +2

      Exactly the Allies were in German soil since late 1944 yet they couldn't even capture Berlin 😂😂

    • @richardpopielarz8526
      @richardpopielarz8526 Год назад

      ​@@JDDC-tq7qmThe forces taking Berlin were Soviet and Polish.

  • @Robert-lg2bl
    @Robert-lg2bl Год назад

    Awesome video !!

  • @cj4short
    @cj4short Год назад +7

    It took a long time for this video to actually provide content related to the title.

  • @benjaminrush4443
    @benjaminrush4443 Год назад +2

    I guess the weapon was the Tank-Flamethrower. Still a good Video. Thanks.

  • @nerdtvch5
    @nerdtvch5 Год назад

    Would you ever consider doing a dark doc on Ancient Egypt ?

  • @gruberstein
    @gruberstein Год назад +147

    Unsubbed, hate when channels use a pic that has nothing to do with the video. It's just like all those ads using stupid pics to get a click.

    • @monkeytimestamps4915
      @monkeytimestamps4915 Год назад +32

      This has been a growing problem with this channel. I used to love these videos and they’re all clickbait and fluff now.

    • @monkeybarmonkeyman
      @monkeybarmonkeyman Год назад +20

      @@monkeytimestamps4915Dat's what happens - typically - when a channel breaks through that 1M viewer count.

    • @jackpeterson3452
      @jackpeterson3452 Год назад +10

      Same unsubscribing

    • @kennethcurtis1856
      @kennethcurtis1856 Год назад +9

      See ya!

    • @Roadglide911
      @Roadglide911 Год назад +12

      This is not an airport so no need to announce your departure. Unlike today there wasn’t a camera every five feet to video the gruesomeness that you crave.

  • @0ldb1ll
    @0ldb1ll 6 месяцев назад

    Ironically, it was the Germans that first introduced the flame thrower. The weapon that the Germans really feared was the Allies incendiary grenade.

  • @0Zolrender0
    @0Zolrender0 8 месяцев назад

    Hey Dark Docs. Your content is good enough to not use click bait icons. If the intended video was meant to be about the Churchill Crocodile tank then it was defiantly not the most feared weapon of the Axis that the allies had. That would be their air superiority late in the war.

  • @ret7army
    @ret7army Год назад +2

    Dark Docs never claimed to be accurate with his imagery be it still or video. That said the thumbnail appears to be a prototype (and i can be wrong) of the M202 FLASH (Flame Assault SHoulder) from the 1960s. That said, severe artillery barrages were known to cause men to literally shit their pants. And flame was always scary as hell so i see nothing wrong in the historical presentation as well.

  • @misplays_irl1261
    @misplays_irl1261 Год назад +2

    video begins at 7:30

  • @paraguaymike5159
    @paraguaymike5159 Год назад +2

    Seven minutes in, and no.mention of any weapon.

  • @petermiller4953
    @petermiller4953 Год назад +3

    I don't watch the videos because of pictures. I watch em for the history. Still subbed!

    • @rosesprog1722
      @rosesprog1722 Год назад +1

      There comes a time when new images must be hard to find, but since it's the story that matters, the rest is secondary. Title a bit misleading though.

  • @nelsonbergman7706
    @nelsonbergman7706 8 месяцев назад

    I did not realize that flamethrowers were used in ETO 🔥

  • @simonkevnorris
    @simonkevnorris Год назад +1

    The Germans used flamethrower in WW1.

  • @railgap
    @railgap Год назад +1

    all sizzle, no steak

    • @railgap
      @railgap Год назад +1

      This piece appears to be a short summary of Operation Veritable, not a weapon. Furthermore, we never once see the made-up, clickbait image that appears in the key frame. Channel has gone weak sauce.

  • @apennameandthata2017
    @apennameandthata2017 Год назад +3

    Clickbait. Not much here about flamethrowers. Also, too few maps.

  • @benelias3556
    @benelias3556 6 месяцев назад +1

    I'm pretty sure no one's going to miss the critics who have unsubscribed LOL

  • @Finnigan9
    @Finnigan9 9 месяцев назад

    Why is the commentator almost whispering? I'm so glad I had a course in Speech and Public Speaking! I wish it was a required subject in every high school.

  • @acecombatter6620
    @acecombatter6620 Год назад +10

    Misleading title and thumbnail clickbait.

    • @Kahsimiah
      @Kahsimiah 6 месяцев назад +1

      Erm. The guy in the picture is literally carrying a flame thrower. For a video that is about the two operations, flame throwers were a key component in. What on earth is clickbait here?

  • @davedixon2068
    @davedixon2068 9 месяцев назад

    Considering this is supposed to be about flame throwers and how terrified the Germans were, there is no mention that they were first invented and used by Germany in the 1st WW, (Flammenwerfer) along with poison gas. The British man portable one shown on the thumbnail was called a Lifebuoy as it resembled a life saving ring on ships and seafronts. As others have said the tank carried version of the flame thrower was carried on a number of different tank types including the Infantry Light Carrier, (Bren Carrier). I suspect flamethrowers were given by the sergeant to the soldier in the section who had p*ssed him off the most as everyone would be trying to take him out ASAP.

  • @cordellej
    @cordellej Год назад +1

    crocodile tanks were used from since D-day . not from this operation as this video leads many to think

  • @ThePressurizer
    @ThePressurizer Год назад +7

    Your titles are becoming ever more ridiculous and clickbaity.

  • @Theire1
    @Theire1 4 месяца назад

    They dont fear the flames they fear the burning fuel :P

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 Год назад +2

    it is flame thrower? after 8 minues you will expect some other weapon of advanced technology

  • @philipliethen519
    @philipliethen519 10 месяцев назад

    It’s INSANE!!! Absolutely & utterly INSANE!!! It’s MORE INSANE than all other INSANE actions! INSANE INSANITY it is!!!

  • @mrmoosecreature
    @mrmoosecreature Год назад

    So what's the weapon?

  • @John14-6...
    @John14-6... 4 месяца назад

    Dragon would have been a more appropriate name than Crocodile

  • @ToddBrooks-o5m
    @ToddBrooks-o5m Год назад +1

    Seems to me the Canadians did all of the British Armies heavy lifting .

  • @joehayward2631
    @joehayward2631 Год назад +1

    Humans greatest fear is being burned to death. Second drowning percentage is low compared

  • @flickingbollocks5542
    @flickingbollocks5542 Год назад +9

    Flame throwers are a nasty kunt of a weapon.
    And not just for the enemy.

    • @lateefpou2986
      @lateefpou2986 Год назад +2

      Facts I was in the army. I was a tank mechanic but I still wouldn't want a damn flamethrower.

  • @clints7834
    @clints7834 Год назад +1

    7 minutes and 30 seconds until you got to the point at hand.

  • @MegaBloggs1
    @MegaBloggs1 Год назад

    Totally lifted from the british army documentary on the same subject-they didnt even bother to redo the diagrams

  • @marklaplante8675
    @marklaplante8675 Год назад +1

    Kind of a click-bait video. You're expecting to see some weird man-portable weapon, like a hand-held rocket launcher or something. And about 8 minutes in you find out that he was referencing a tank with a flame-thrower. This is an instant turn-off for me and makes me question the integrity of the video creator.

  • @Bitdog4U
    @Bitdog4U Год назад +1

    Frightening weapons of the future might look like this.
    What if, a DLE60 motors header pipes went down and then back to mount the tail elevator & rudder. The two biplane wings made out of Sitka spruce beams covered in urethane foam and visqueen were mounted on those pipes also. The headers pipes also held the engine that had a low carb facing forward as an air scoop and the crank had a 2 blade prop on front and one on the rear 90 degrees difference. The mortar bomb and $40 cellphone brains were mounted below the lower wing and thousands of them were sent to Ukraine, with a note attached. You write the cell phone app that controls the plane & you write the ONline game so kids around the world can blow up Russian tanks for fun. Of course you would have to sell the monthly gun camera DVD to pay for it all. But that goes without saying, as does the T-shirt sales, hero of the month rewards, etc. No invading army would stand a chance after that. I would consider a design where the tail elevator and the upper wing were the same height when flying level. The motor slightly above the upper wing so the drive shaft for the rear prop went all the way behind the tail which had the rudder going down with a skid rod sticking down and back on the bottom, that way to turn right the rudder would also bank the plane in the right direction instead the the wrong direction as a vertical rudder does & it would keep the prop out of the dirt. And the wings tilted up to take off instead of elevators with flaps. Then to separate the wings I would have a flat plate made of plastic in the shape of a pink pig (When viewed from the side). Because my dad always said after I bit the dog, son you can end all wars when pigs can fly.
    PS, I would burn used veggie oil in a blower burner to melt outboard motors and car tyranny's from the garbage dump for the aluminum and make boxer 100cc motors with a magneto for $100 so the whole bomb delivery system cost $200 total and it would cost thousands to shoot it down. Lower manufacturing cost is how wars are won. Once you build one and show it off, you'll have a buyer call you. Believe it or nut.
    Sincerely Bitdog4u

  • @andrewhammond1949
    @andrewhammond1949 Год назад +2

    250,000 soldiers shoulder to shoulder? I’ve told you 500,000 times don’t exaggerate?

  • @johntrottier1162
    @johntrottier1162 Год назад +10

    Like Market Garden before it and Operation Plunder after it, Veritable was an expensive and very slow operation. Montgomery's tactics during this campaign mirrored the tactics of WWI as did the majority of the battles he fought. He tried a narrow front assault once, and that operation is well documented as a "Bridge Too Far".
    Otherwise he conducted a slow grinding attacks back by a huge amount of artillery.
    He took so long to build up the supplies and equipment that the Germans knew almost to the day when the attack would commence.
    The Germans defended skillfully and made 21st Army Group pay dearly for every foot of ground.
    The Germans did not respect Monty and his tactics. What they did respect was that the American armies to the south made much better progress and uncovered the German southern flank. That forced the Germans to fall back across the Rhine.
    When that happened Monty got his "victory".

    • @Trebor74
      @Trebor74 Год назад +2

      Whereas,it could be seen that Monty wanted enough material for the battle and wanted to save as many loves as possible by using artillery bombardment instead of boots on the ground. Also,the tactics towards the end of the war were successful.

  • @thesleekgreek
    @thesleekgreek Год назад +2

    Clickbaiting with the picture. Ain’t subscribing to be lied to

  • @ManiacSkateboarding
    @ManiacSkateboarding Год назад +44

    Yeah this weapon made them panic and not the millions of Soviet soldiers pouring into Germany😂

    • @Great_Sandwich
      @Great_Sandwich Год назад +13

      How is your comment even relevant? Different place, different time, different situation. Can't two things be true at the same time? So, only ONE thing in the entire war made them nervous? (Friggin' bright bulb, over here.)

    • @GardenerEarthGuy
      @GardenerEarthGuy Год назад +1

      Oh yeah- America won the second war... 😂

    • @lordchaa1598
      @lordchaa1598 Год назад

      @@Great_Sandwich, don’t worry, it’s just another Putin bot or stupid MAGA moron. I hope they’re not paying him in rubles to post this drivel. No worries though, soon even the trolls will be sent into the meat grinder in Ukraine, never to be heard from again. Turns out air soft suits don’t really protect to well against actual bullets.

    • @hicknopunk
      @hicknopunk Год назад +3

      ​@@Great_Sandwichyou're drunk or trolling, right?

    • @Great_Sandwich
      @Great_Sandwich Год назад +5

      @@hicknopunk You're a kid whose historical knowledge comes from playing Call of Duty, right?

  • @generalkayoss7347
    @generalkayoss7347 Год назад +2

    But not really.

  • @glorybound7599
    @glorybound7599 8 месяцев назад

    A weapon that anyone open the USA 🇺🇸 can purchase and own with no restrictions and not requiring an FFL.

  • @stefanschleps8758
    @stefanschleps8758 Год назад +1

    What's this about?

  • @adamb45003
    @adamb45003 Год назад +5

    Use to be great videos, mostly click bait and repeat information

  • @TheGV50
    @TheGV50 9 месяцев назад

    0:33 World War 1 German Army footage LOL!!!!

  • @vincedibona4687
    @vincedibona4687 Год назад

    Nice.

  • @panzerpoodle
    @panzerpoodle Год назад

    Ich möchte keinen Flammenwerfer tragen, die ziehen Kugeln an😂

  • @jimififul
    @jimififul 9 месяцев назад

    Bernard Montgomery - NOT Bernaaaard!

  • @raysmith1971
    @raysmith1971 Год назад

    7:23 The weapon is the flamethrower

  • @shiladityahaldar5241
    @shiladityahaldar5241 11 месяцев назад

    The story in the video has no link with the picture in the caption.Neither the title matches the contents. When did this channel resorted to such practices?

  • @maineoutdoorsman677
    @maineoutdoorsman677 Год назад +1

    So 7:34 till they say anything about flamethrowers
    So in reality is the only thing the German soldiers we're really scared of a was the allied soldiers not the flamethrowers like you saying that your description

  • @shanemossmoss
    @shanemossmoss Год назад

    It never ceases to amaze me if the yanks fight and succeed than its The American forces a young else it just the Allies.

    • @hotdog9262
      @hotdog9262 Год назад

      most of germany faught on the eastern front anyway. seems most programs, books and videos fail to mention this which is quite funny. nationalism trumps objective truthful story telling

  • @julesw4037
    @julesw4037 9 месяцев назад

    It is not appropriate to, finally in the last 10 seconds, reflect the video description.

  • @janhviljoen
    @janhviljoen 5 месяцев назад

    Don't get sucked in by the advertisement for adjustable glasses. The glasses are pure rubbish.

  • @gdutfulkbhh7537
    @gdutfulkbhh7537 Год назад +1

    Wow, lots of filler in this one. Spinning it out in order to monetize?

  • @dionysise5008
    @dionysise5008 Год назад +1

    I wish you could speak cooler or slower I should say cause otherwise your videos are perfect

  • @roberthavens7700
    @roberthavens7700 Год назад +1

    Stop the click bait thumbnails

  • @phyxlor
    @phyxlor Год назад

    7:26 before we get to it..... meh

  • @WilliamDudley
    @WilliamDudley Год назад +1

    a bit click-baity, don't you think?

  • @geoffvador
    @geoffvador Год назад

    Oh it's about the crocodile, was wondering what that fat bloke was holding

  • @johngalt6929
    @johngalt6929 Год назад +3

    Clickbait

  • @alasdairblack393
    @alasdairblack393 Год назад

    All that loss of life fighting Fascism only to see its resurgence in USA.

  • @steveolive9991
    @steveolive9991 Год назад +1

    Flamethrowers were mostly used by the US soldiers and Marines in the Pacific.

  • @rosesprog1722
    @rosesprog1722 Год назад +7

    Sadly, much of this could have been avoided if Roosevelt hadn't called for an unconditional surrender, even the generals who had offered to bring down Hitler were ignored. Apparently, nothing less than the complete destruction of Germany would do, and that's what they got.

    • @marycopeland4049
      @marycopeland4049 Год назад +2

      The arrogance of those men that see themselves as omnipotent….

    • @joejohnson4183
      @joejohnson4183 Год назад

      Because the allies learned their lesson in WW1 by having an armistice so with an unconditional surrender they have complete control over their enemies . You remind me of all the people calling for Israel to have a cease fire after being attacked . The object of war is hurting your enemies so bad that not only do they agree to surrender but will never challenge you again . Something America and the west has forgotten about .

    • @Asymmetrical-Saggin
      @Asymmetrical-Saggin Год назад

      Empty head.

    • @rosesprog1722
      @rosesprog1722 Год назад +1

      @@marycopeland4049 ... and for whom human life has no value whatsoever.

    • @wstavis3135
      @wstavis3135 Год назад +12

      It wasn't "arrogance". Neither the Germans nor the Japanese deserved a negotiated surrender. They were faced with two choices because they both initiated the war. Surrender unconditionally or die. The fact that either of you feels it was unjustified simply shows your ignorant naivete.

  • @pmdwyer274
    @pmdwyer274 9 месяцев назад

    Slow down and turn the damn misic off!

  • @budgiefriend
    @budgiefriend Год назад +11

    Unsubbed as well. Tired of clickbait....

  • @Manny7RM
    @Manny7RM 9 месяцев назад

    United States Army Air Force,
    Air Force was not born yet.

  • @stonefox9124
    @stonefox9124 Год назад +1

    This was a terror weapon at Normandy but once it became known it was just another weapon.

    • @larslarsman
      @larslarsman Год назад +1

      Plausible deniability, good one. Next?

  • @gordon295
    @gordon295 Год назад +1

    How do you get away with this BS ???

  • @newtronix
    @newtronix Год назад

    A pretty useful funny.

  • @Vickyvee97
    @Vickyvee97 Год назад

    It's at 7:19 just fyi