I can't call you angry I can't call you birds I can't invite you to Rio I can't celebrate the seasons with you I can't explore outer space with you I can't play Knights with you I can't race with you I can't pop Bad Piggies with you I can't transform with you I can't be a jedi with you ...I can't launch you anymore...
this isn’t the first time rovio have done something like this lol. back in april, angry birds pop got a new app icon that featured ai art and no rovio employee commented on it at all. the person who is currently the brand strategist for the angry birds ip has also been seen training ai tools off of fanart people have made for angry birds. theyre absolutely gonna do something like this again
Why do you care if a prototype or promotional art is made with AI art? You'd also complain if they asked people to draw for them for free. Using AI for prototypes before hiring someone to make the real product sounds like a completely normal and fine thing to me.
Besides, even if they are lying, what's wrong with using AI for a promotional picture? The fact that it's AI? How is that bad? Because it's AI? Endless loop with no real explanation other than unjustified anger.
Talk about the Disney artist who’s now using AI generated images and used AI in “drawing” a new Ducktales comic cover for Disney. Maybe they’ll change it before it’s released
@@imtyler99yearsago90 What you mean? Among Us may not be as popular, but it’s still functioning as usual, and is supported by the King of Honorary Indie Games, Innersloth.
I agree with everything you said! While I agree using AI for art ideas is alright. The fact that they used this "art prototype" to advertise/promote the game is the problem, and it was definitely intentional. Like Vailskibum said, they should have kept this behind the scenes until they had an actual artist create the final design.
Месяц назад+307
Just reading the comments it seems like no one actually watched the video and they're just taking the title at face value huh.... This is not "bad", this is good, the community called them out and they're gonna be more careful in the future, the use of AI art for prototypes or early testing phases is fine as long as it's not released to the public, especially more so when it's a private model trained solely on their own artwork, so it's unlikely they'll repeat this incident.
Its like these people never heard about "never judge a book by its cover" like can you actually watch the video for once instead of just crying over the AI, I might aswell play a sad song on the worlds tiniest violin like Mr. krabs if I see another person crying over it🤦♂
It hurts being an Angry Birds Fan right now. This franchise had a shining light when AB reloaded & Rovio Classic Angry Birds came out. But then the franchise died again when they removed the original game from Android & this AI crap.
Oh my gosh, you're acting like they just killed the entire global population. It's not even that deep. Every company makes a mistake and we gotta acknowledge that
Just because you're an artist doesn't mean you have to be so proud and arrogant. There are so many artists that are angry and you don't need to stand out
It's not just Rovio, all companies have been consumed by greed, and a few just ignore their fanbase. It's not just big name game companies too, even some smaller indie companies refuse to listen to their fans, especially if some games involve issues that the fans actually hate and want reverted.
Man.... I remember Angry Birds used to be PHENOMENAL at advertising their games. I still remember the funny animated shorts they used as trailers... They were so good...
*Rovio remembering that Angry Birds fell off a long time ago: 😭😭😭* *Rovio if "The Angry Birds Movie 3" flops at the box office due to nobody caring about Angry Birds anymore: 😭😭😭* *Rovio remembering that nobody wants to play their 55250th basic and trash Angry Birds-themed mobile game: 😭😭😭*
@@imtyler99yearsago90calm down, we will still see the 3rd angry birds movie, everyone will still care about angry birds. I will defeat ai art by turning the ai project into a classic 2010’s angry birds slingshot game ( being good )
...They seriously couldn't even attempt to EDIT the blatant AI oddities of the image? Like, I'm not advocating for companies doing bad things and covering it up to mislead their customers, but given that they do it anyway, I'm legitimately shocked there were so many obvious indicators of AI left in the image
I don't see a problem with it for prototyping only, as long as it's only being used internally for initial ideas, doesn't steal random people's art, and it's not used for public marketing material. Only the third thing is really what went wrong here in my opinion, as it was publicly shared and used as official marketing material.
@@Joe-7706 What you're describing certainly sounds like Angry Fans to me ngl. I just want Epic back and instead we get AI art using, crappy reskinned generic puzzle games.
@@TheDogeOfSarcasm yeah all I’m saying is that we keep getting lazy ass games when all we want is the classic games or even spin off that are the quality of the past ones like epic
to be aboslutly real, the a.i was made by a human, the work was based of of rovio work, if its only for development, theres literally like no reason to still be upset
i've been a fan since 2010/2011, i had a bad feeling about the franchise since toons came in like, yeah, toons nowadays is one of the few things i still enjoy about ab, but since then i feel like they forgot the "angry" part of angry birds, just by watching the current ab friends title screen you can relate. I may sound like a "new bad old good" typa person, but pre-chrome and chrome (and also the era of flash games oh my god that era was pure joy for me) were the peak of angry birds.
yall are shitting on rovio but tbh i feel like ai art is acceptable if it's trained on your own world and ONLY used as a placeholder/prototype and not the final product
As a part of a small indistudio I understand their response and how AI can speed up the process of prototyping or getting inspiration... it's usally better than just using squares... but as you said, putting this as display for a relativly big community is not really bright... it seems like a test if the audience recognises that AI was used or not... a final project should imo only contain self created art & music...
But here the thing they used ai as a tool which is what people wanted Like using ai for draft designs before they officially go into production Tho yes they should of kept this internally and not used as marketing For things like survey research is fine as that's just test phase but going full public that can be confusing for official release
its kinda like Stone Story RPG, where they have "ai art" as a "concept" to "visualize an idea" to "then build from scratch" for their game, "but instead" they "didn't promote that ai art to public", unlike rovio.
I mean... At least they're honest? I'll give them that It ain't everyday a company's gonna be like that and admit they were in the wrong, In any consequence really, Not just this so it's great to see it sounds like they (hopefully) learnt something from this
If it’s an early stage prototype than what was the point of it being soft launched this early? additionally I just wanted to say that the reasoning for it being available for everyone was because they needed more people to test it and give their thoughts they were basically asking for fan input of any kind such as the fans opinions on the ai art or ways they could improve the gameplay. I’d love to give some input but it’s only on android and I have an iPhone as of now
I think that the use of ai in this scenario is ok! If the ai is trained off of Rovios own artwork made by there team, than it’s fine. Artists art are not being stolen. It also makes sense, I would understand not wanting to waste artists time for something that doesn’t get far and ends up getting scrapped and never touched again,ultimately wasting there artists time. Ai art as a place holder vs a finalized piece is what it comes to and how you feel about that is how you’ll look at it.
I believe they allegedly also stole some of the art assets that are used in game. Just google this you will find reddit threads about this. And no Rovio did not train their own AI (regardless of they may or may not have claimed). They are likely using a pre trained base model ( trained unethically) and then fine tuning with their own art.
People getting mad about laziness in generating a poster for the game, meanwhile the whole angry birds franchise has always been basically plagiarism. :'D
"Prototype" The game was a finished product, with microtransactions, and gameplay. Don't call it a prototype, Rovio, because it was obviously released to the public.
why is everyone suddenly forgetting about concept artist. they’re not a small company, its not like they cant hire someone to come up w ideas instead of placing an ai do to their job.
@AviTwesvii that's fair but they don't need to super transparent about everything. They did say it is just a prototype and it doesn't make sense that they would need to be transparent about that especially when they're training their own ai with their own art library.
I think he was referring to the use of the images rather than the use of ai art in general since its a prototype, so what i understood from it, yes tell us you’re using ai, no don’t use it for actual games.
@@c4t610 That makes sense. I think using ai is great for brainstorming but it shouldn't be used for advertisement or final product. I think it's nice that they also developed their own ai trained on their own library of artwork too.
thats understandable tbh it costs alot to make promo art and when your testing a games concept with an already small budget that art will take a good percentage of funds and they even said theyd replace it when there out of prototype so whats the big deal anymore i wish people viewed ai as a tool and not a villian cause ai isnt the bad entity making all these things happen its like saying a gun murders people and not the wielder of the gun that pulled the trigger
i think mcdonalds also udes ai art on their restaurants, or maybe not. in Mcdonalds (or at least on the one is close to my location) there are like these poster about a roblox game or something using these Mcdonald workers in anime style. since the style of the ad is kinda ai like I don't really know. idk if anybody else has talked about this.
Here's my point in all this, but I know it might piss off some people: I don't mind Rovio using AI to prototype the game, but the problem is that they should've made it CLEAR with everyone that the game was still in early access. If this game was branded as being in early access, that would've solved SO MANY problems Rovio could've had with marketing and making the game, because if the players are aware of what's made with AI, and that it's all subject to change, nobody would've complained. I don't mind creators using AI to assist in asset development, I really don't understand why people hate AI for exising so much, but the point is that Rovio was using AI in the way they should, but should've made it clear to people playing the game that the assets were temporary.
Agreed, using AI for concepts and ideas is fine, and I think some people need to realize that. Especially since AI isn't leaving any time soon. But I also agree with some people's arguments with how AI is being used right now.
@@so12productions Understandable. People have been using AI in shitty ways, I can't deny that, but I don't think it's an excuse to hate AI as a whole. Yes, we should stop people from using AI in shitty ways, but AI does have it's benefits as well. But this is as far as I'll go on this matter, cuz I don't want a war in the replies.
I can probably see the use of AI art for like- temporary thumbnails for the game as it develops Because I don't think artists would want to redraw every new concept, but again that's a bit of a controversial statement-
I think it would’ve been fine if it was a mistake that it got out, because I think that early stage prototype stuff is some of the only things that AI images should be used for. However, they put it out for the world to see, which I don’t think was a good thing. I do hope that Rovio learn from this, and I’m also glad that they only trained it on their own stuff
Uh, I dont think they have enough art internally even to train an AI. They are likely using a base model which has been pre trained unethically and only fine tuning with rovio art (if at all).
@anon6383 Angry birds came out in 2009, and has over 140 projects under their belt. Im sure they have plenty of art to feed it. And again, you obviously dont know for sure and are reaching.
@@zerik_media haha buddy sure i am the one reaching. Do you have any idea about the monetary costs to train a model from scratch. If they had that much cash, they could have just hired an artist you know.
I mean... what's the matter? If the AI is built internally and trained on their own work, why is it so bad that they used it for a prototype? The wrong details are just wrong details that most people won't notice nor care about.
This is technically what AI is meant for, its meant for prototyping and concepts but not as a final product, Its fine that they are using it for speeding up concepts, btu they should really be getting people to remake and clean the images properly before beta if this is the direction they are going. It's just like the guy that said "The graphics are the first thing a game finishes, controls and missions are done later".
Rovio: 'Damn, fans didn't like that, we should change this and be more cautious..' Rovio after taking 80% of all angry bird games off the app store: 'Damn, fans didn't like that, oh well.'
Why do you care if a prototype or promotional art is made with AI art? You'd also complain if they asked people to draw for them for free. Using AI for prototypes before hiring someone to make the real product sounds like a completely normal and fine thing to me.
Besides, even if they are lying, what's wrong with using AI for a promotional picture? The fact that it's AI? How is that bad? Because it's AI? Endless loop with no real explanation other than unjustified anger.
I mean im an artist and hate a.i. but if they only use it for prototypes or beta builds and its only based off of their own art and products it is fine. its not going to be used for the final product. if it is used for the final product then ill be pissed. but something like this I feel like is fine.
It's their game, and they have the creative freedom to develop it however they choose. If it's not to your liking, you can simply choose not to play it. its literally just an ai photo, you are being a content farm rn. In this case, the AI-generated photo is just a part of their artistic vision, and there's nothing inherently wrong with that.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
caught in 4k 📸
Yes
👀
Ye
Agreed
📸
The birds are no longer angry, it’s the fans now.
I saw you in ii ep17...
So are the pigs Rovio?
I'll go grab the slingshot.
Angry Birds fell off
@@ayaancoolboy3887bfdi
I can't call you angry
I can't call you birds
I can't invite you to Rio
I can't celebrate the seasons with you
I can't explore outer space with you
I can't play Knights with you
I can't race with you
I can't pop Bad Piggies with you
I can't transform with you
I can't be a jedi with you
...I can't launch you anymore...
😭
Pure poetry
Why did bro cook? 🗣️🔥
bro was mad so he turned into William Shakespeare
I can't race with you…
"You know, when I was a kid....I used to think you were cool........"
Reference.
@@diegcon0which reference?
@rezaghanbari2172 To that video.
@@rezaghanbari2172 hotdiggitydemon channel
A straight white man
And here I thought the “I” in AI stood for intelligence
Nah, It's Artificial Incompetence
It doesn't.
oh, the influence
Nah, Ai means Artificial Ignorance. Maybe Artificial Idiocracy.
Lmao
this isn’t the first time rovio have done something like this lol. back in april, angry birds pop got a new app icon that featured ai art and no rovio employee commented on it at all. the person who is currently the brand strategist for the angry birds ip has also been seen training ai tools off of fanart people have made for angry birds. theyre absolutely gonna do something like this again
SEGA spent hundreds of millions to buy ROVIO. Let that sink in.
sounds like misinfo tbh
@@nazomius7033 And nothing changed. Rovio is still Rovio.
Why do you care if a prototype or promotional art is made with AI art? You'd also complain if they asked people to draw for them for free. Using AI for prototypes before hiring someone to make the real product sounds like a completely normal and fine thing to me.
Besides, even if they are lying, what's wrong with using AI for a promotional picture? The fact that it's AI? How is that bad? Because it's AI? Endless loop with no real explanation other than unjustified anger.
I wish we could go back to the old days when we had actual good Angry Birds games like the OG, Seasons, Rio, Star Wars 1 and 2, Space, Go!, and Epic
I'm suprised AB Transformers is still alive and kicking, almost 10years since it was first out
Agreed
Dont forget Space!
All they ever make now is candy crush clones like what the hell are they doing
I remember Angry Bords Go
This is the worst time to be an angry birds fan…
I want Rovio to bring back Angry Birds Star Wars 1 & 2
True that.
It's never a good time.
@@wolfgangamadeusmozart1293Bruh what a coincidence I was just playing angry birds star wars 2 lol
Yeah, Angry Birds was my youth game
Bro why do companies keep hyping up ai its like do they not check online bc NOBODY IS EXCITED ABOUT IT😭
If you checked online atleast 70% of people are excited about it
@@tonypatino1765because they are gonna use it for the wrong purpose
Only you Americans have problems with it, the rest of the world doesn't mind.
@@tonypatino1765yeah
@@SimplyTheGuyoh yeah, they are going Terminator with AI
I miss the 2010's golden age of Angry Birds. I'm a huge fan, but this age of Angry Birds just isn't the same, unlike the golden age.
Angry Birds fell off, just like Fall Guys and Among Us
@@imtyler99yearsago90 Among Us isn't even THAT bad, it just isn't as popular as it once was.
@@imtyler99yearsago90 Not exactly
I miss the 2010s. Wish I could visit them with my mind now
Yeah same here. Although I really like Reloaded, I don't care about paying for Apple Arcade, it's a great remake with regular updates.
Talk about the Disney artist who’s now using AI generated images and used AI in “drawing” a new Ducktales comic cover for Disney. Maybe they’ll change it before it’s released
Who had a harder fall off?
Angry Birds or Among Us
@@imtyler99yearsago90Angry birds for sure
@@so12productions can't forget pvz but yeah angry birds definitely
@@imtyler99yearsago90 What you mean? Among Us may not be as popular, but it’s still functioning as usual, and is supported by the King of Honorary Indie Games, Innersloth.
@@imtyler99yearsago90Among Us is still great
0:14 I used to have one of those robots during my childhood, thanks for making me feel nostalgic 🥲
Same 🥲
That was a blast from the past.
Same, I also had the one with the blue eyes.
Me too
That's what I was gonna say
This is why AI should NEVER take people's jobs.
This ⬆️
Yeah, AI should help people with their jobs not replace them.
@@so12productionslol
@@so12productions like we care
@@shrubbush-ts4tywho tf are you?
I agree with everything you said!
While I agree using AI for art ideas is alright. The fact that they used this "art prototype" to advertise/promote the game is the problem, and it was definitely intentional. Like Vailskibum said, they should have kept this behind the scenes until they had an actual artist create the final design.
Just reading the comments it seems like no one actually watched the video and they're just taking the title at face value huh.... This is not "bad", this is good, the community called them out and they're gonna be more careful in the future, the use of AI art for prototypes or early testing phases is fine as long as it's not released to the public, especially more so when it's a private model trained solely on their own artwork, so it's unlikely they'll repeat this incident.
Exactly
You are now officially the smartest user on the internet,here is your crown 👑
100% agree with everything you said!
Its like these people never heard about "never judge a book by its cover" like can you actually watch the video for once instead of just crying over the AI, I might aswell play a sad song on the worlds tiniest violin like Mr. krabs if I see another person crying over it🤦♂
Perhaps, but the response feels ai-generated to me
0:36 The "BLLLEAAUUGHH!" 🤮🤮🤮 is back lmao 🤣
It hurts being an Angry Birds Fan right now. This franchise had a shining light when AB reloaded & Rovio Classic Angry Birds came out. But then the franchise died again when they removed the original game from Android & this AI crap.
Oh my gosh, you're acting like they just killed the entire global population. It's not even that deep. Every company makes a mistake and we gotta acknowledge that
Angry birds reloaded doesn't even exist...
WHERE IS A ANDROID PORT ROVIO???
I would NEVER do a thing like THAT!
Same here!
What did the word that do to you? 😭
Never what
@@ItchyBurritoMiniAltThingy never gonna give you up
@@Xamrugins rip
AI just doesn't know when to quit...
@@MercedesSerrano-1815 It just a tool you evil digimon
🤦♂️
they're just following orders
@@gryphonphillips5669 A tool that can only exist by plagiarizing the entire internet
@@gryphonphillips5669evil digimon is now my main insult
2:56 if want to win back their support then maybe they should, I don’t know,
BRING BACK THE OLD GAMES AND STOP MAKING CANDY CRUSH CLONES!
Agreed 100%
these aren't "high standards." these are expectations of basic respect towards artists.
Just because you're an artist doesn't mean you have to be so proud and arrogant. There are so many artists that are angry and you don't need to stand out
@@chocolatevanillaswirlya you don't get to steal, you're not entitled to forced unpaid labour just because you want it
@@bunnywar You're entitled to the features made available to you. If someone's getting replaced theyre getting replaced.
Let's replace you@@trento6842
I mean, they are still technically putting effort. They said they made the AI themselves.
If they want quality, THEY SHOULD'VE KEPT THE OLD GAMES!!!!!!!!!!!
@@goonking420 People get bored of older things regardless of quality normally.
@gryphonphillips5669 so you're saying you DON'T want them back?!
@@gryphonphillips5669 I mean, just cause people are bored of say minecraft, doesnt mean it should be fricken removed from all store fronts.
@@ianbrink4487 exactly! That's what I'm saying!
Ik like,why did they do that😭
that angry birds christmas animation in background, the nostalgia hit me like a truck
no ai means no ai, big fat greedy corporations, learn to read our comments FOR ONCE
Why would they do that if they make money anyway?
@@BarbaraCienfuegos “fat” is a insult and they have to make money to pay their employees realistically.
What has Rovio become?
all companies have been and will become mr krabs
It's not just Rovio, all companies have been consumed by greed, and a few just ignore their fanbase. It's not just big name game companies too, even some smaller indie companies refuse to listen to their fans, especially if some games involve issues that the fans actually hate and want reverted.
@@medicTF2. Mr Krabs:Hello, i like money
@@medicTF2.Atleast mr krabs learns from his mistakes💀
A cash grab
Man.... I remember Angry Birds used to be PHENOMENAL at advertising their games. I still remember the funny animated shorts they used as trailers... They were so good...
They even put a giant inflatable Red on the Seattle Space Needle
2009: Angry Birds
2024: Angry Fans
Common Modern Rovio L
*Rovio remembering that Angry Birds fell off a long time ago: 😭😭😭*
*Rovio if "The Angry Birds Movie 3" flops at the box office due to nobody caring about Angry Birds anymore: 😭😭😭*
*Rovio remembering that nobody wants to play their 55250th basic and trash Angry Birds-themed mobile game: 😭😭😭*
@@imtyler99yearsago90calm down, we will still see the 3rd angry birds movie, everyone will still care about angry birds. I will defeat ai art by turning the ai project into a classic 2010’s angry birds slingshot game ( being good )
@@imtyler99yearsago90 Fr Bro
We have been caught in 4K!
...They seriously couldn't even attempt to EDIT the blatant AI oddities of the image? Like, I'm not advocating for companies doing bad things and covering it up to mislead their customers, but given that they do it anyway, I'm legitimately shocked there were so many obvious indicators of AI left in the image
When The Angry Birds Movies are better than the games recently is honestly sad.
The second movie is terrible.
@@Josue_S_6411 There was a second movie?
@@mekingtiger9095 yes, I don’t have an opinion on it because I haven’t watched it.
I'd rather not watch the movies
@@gryphonphillips5669 i have and holy crap it was ass
Oh rovio, how much more are you going to kill my childhood 😭
You know a series has gone bad when they resort to using AI.
And that they have fallen off badly
And go away from a good formula
It’s for beta testing
Coca Cola got caught using AI for this year’s Christmas commercials too
it’s not “getting caught” if coca-cola is proudly brandishing their ai content like a flag
I noticed that
I don't see a problem with it for prototyping only, as long as it's only being used internally for initial ideas, doesn't steal random people's art, and it's not used for public marketing material. Only the third thing is really what went wrong here in my opinion, as it was publicly shared and used as official marketing material.
Agreed. Like, It's a placeholder of some sort even
our newest angry birds game
is
*angry fans*
Nah our real new game is just a reskin of an already existing game but with an angry birds skin
@@Joe-7706 What you're describing certainly sounds like Angry Fans to me ngl. I just want Epic back and instead we get AI art using, crappy reskinned generic puzzle games.
@@TheDogeOfSarcasm yeah all I’m saying is that we keep getting lazy ass games when all we want is the classic games or even spin off that are the quality of the past ones like epic
Thank goodness that Rovio is taking criticism, I guess Sega's aquistion kinda redeemed them.
50 SECONDS TO A VAILSKIBUM VIDEO??????
to be aboslutly real, the a.i was made by a human, the work was based of of rovio work, if its only for development, theres literally like no reason to still be upset
i've been a fan since 2010/2011, i had a bad feeling about the franchise since toons came in
like, yeah, toons nowadays is one of the few things i still enjoy about ab, but since then i feel like they forgot the "angry" part of angry birds, just by watching the current ab friends title screen you can relate.
I may sound like a "new bad old good" typa person, but pre-chrome and chrome (and also the era of flash games oh my god that era was pure joy for me) were the peak of angry birds.
To be honest, I can support the use of AI art when it's used only for placeholders and is replaced with usual high quality art at official release
Agreed, that's what AI should be. Instead we have people trying to create robot domination.
It's made by stealing from everyone on the planet, there is no good use of it
yall are shitting on rovio but tbh i feel like ai art is acceptable if it's trained on your own world and ONLY used as a placeholder/prototype and not the final product
No AI Should be banned. It shouldn't exist.
Womp womp , cry more@@Spider-Man1408
@@Spider-Man1408 that's never going to happen, so we must make it so it works along side you.
fair point.
@@itzgoogol69420 EXACTLY. And or shtposts
"Hey guys, we just left it just to see how you'd resonate with it, only after that we let our Sr. Artist to finish it."
Sure lil corporate bro.
As a part of a small indistudio I understand their response and how AI can speed up the process of prototyping or getting inspiration... it's usally better than just using squares... but as you said, putting this as display for a relativly big community is not really bright... it seems like a test if the audience recognises that AI was used or not... a final project should imo only contain self created art & music...
angry birds more like angry fans
Kek
But here the thing they used ai as a tool which is what people wanted
Like using ai for draft designs before they officially go into production
Tho yes they should of kept this internally and not used as marketing
For things like survey research is fine as that's just test phase but going full public that can be confusing for official release
its kinda like Stone Story RPG, where they have "ai art" as a "concept" to "visualize an idea" to "then build from scratch" for their game, "but instead" they "didn't promote that ai art to public", unlike rovio.
@@samkid123 Too many quotations
I mean... At least they're honest? I'll give them that
It ain't everyday a company's gonna be like that and admit they were in the wrong, In any consequence really, Not just this so it's great to see it sounds like they (hopefully) learnt something from this
I think they used ai art back then as well, but they never mentioned it, not until they were caught, like this one
I don't think they learned sadly. This has happened before according to other comments. If they didn't learn then, they likely haven't now.
@@TheDogeOfSarcasm Well i guess the one way to find out is that they do it again, In which case: Yeah they didn't learn bullcrap
The fact that this will be nostalgic for some people is just sad
@@pastelbluemoon generational gap between us and them
I don’t see a issue with it being a place holder as long as it uses real art for the full release
If the game is a prototype. Why the hell is it an available game to the public.
@@RealDmrau567 Looking for fan feedback you virus
beta testing is always available
and its an excuse
If it’s an early stage prototype than what was the point of it being soft launched this early? additionally I just wanted to say that the reasoning for it being available for everyone was because they needed more people to test it and give their thoughts they were basically asking for fan input of any kind such as the fans opinions on the ai art or ways they could improve the gameplay. I’d love to give some input but it’s only on android and I have an iPhone as of now
Even Coca Cola uses AI for their ads now
I fucking hate it
Can we be grateful that the Angry Birds comics that IDW made in 2014 are back and better than ever?
Still waiting for these guys to bring Angry Birds Epic back to the appstore. Prob the only Angry Birds game worth playing rn imo
“We apologize, we will now only take half the dose of the research chemicals we smoke before doing anything”
I think that the use of ai in this scenario is ok! If the ai is trained off of Rovios own artwork made by there team, than it’s fine. Artists art are not being stolen. It also makes sense, I would understand not wanting to waste artists time for something that doesn’t get far and ends up getting scrapped and never touched again,ultimately wasting there artists time. Ai art as a place holder vs a finalized piece is what it comes to and how you feel about that is how you’ll look at it.
I believe they allegedly also stole some of the art assets that are used in game. Just google this you will find reddit threads about this. And no Rovio did not train their own AI (regardless of they may or may not have claimed). They are likely using a pre trained base model ( trained unethically) and then fine tuning with their own art.
People getting mad about laziness in generating a poster for the game, meanwhile the whole angry birds franchise has always been basically plagiarism. :'D
"Prototype"
The game was a finished product, with microtransactions, and gameplay. Don't call it a prototype, Rovio, because it was obviously released to the public.
Man, and here I am playing the old games with APKs on my Android phone... Apparently I haven't missed much.
It was a prototype. A freaking prototype. We got trolled so hard.
I guess crude drawings would work better for a prototype. I mean, the 7DRL build of Dicey Dungeons looked different.
they thought they wasn't getting caught.
gramer
@@medicTF2. nigga what are talking about nothing is misspell.
@@medicTF2. Grammar* you cant even spell why are you responding to them
I remember when the Angry Birds games had some passion put into them. I miss those days. 😞
Well, this can’t be good
It can be good.
I miss when Angry Birds was on the App Store. I played it on my old iPhone 5 and iPad Mini 2
“They’ll probably be more cautious moving forward…”
Meaning they’ll do it again, but make sure they won’t get caught. 🤦🏾♂️
That is what I was thinking. That they would just make the AI images ✨better✨ 😕
@@bluej.studios4523That's a good thing.
...Imma wait until Rovio themselves says they'll be more cautious moving forward to say that
why is everyone suddenly forgetting about concept artist. they’re not a small company, its not like they cant hire someone to come up w ideas instead of placing an ai do to their job.
at least old chuck is back (he appeared in the first cutscenes in the first angry birds game
0:55 Which Angry Birds game is that commercial playing in the background?
The only reason AI art was bad was because it was stealing art from others. Without that issue, theres literally nothing wrong with using it.
2009-2018:Angry Birds 2019-Present:Angry Fans
who the hell cares
0:35 bro sounded like a shulker 💀💀
2:45 so you'd rather they not be transparent with their fans???
I'd rather them be transparent about it from the beginning, not just when they get backlash for doing something profoundly shitty
@AviTwesvii that's fair but they don't need to super transparent about everything. They did say it is just a prototype and it doesn't make sense that they would need to be transparent about that especially when they're training their own ai with their own art library.
@@AviTwesviiWhy would they need to be transparent on a non issue?
I think he was referring to the use of the images rather than the use of ai art in general since its a prototype, so what i understood from it, yes tell us you’re using ai, no don’t use it for actual games.
@@c4t610 That makes sense. I think using ai is great for brainstorming but it shouldn't be used for advertisement or final product. I think it's nice that they also developed their own ai trained on their own library of artwork too.
Damn it's sad to see one of my childhood nostalgic classics fumble so hard 🙁
Idk why yall are still angry at them, they just apologized and said they will do better and thanked you guys for holding them up to high standarts
thats understandable tbh it costs alot to make promo art and when your testing a games concept with an already small budget that art will take a good percentage of funds and they even said theyd replace it when there out of prototype so whats the big deal anymore i wish people viewed ai as a tool and not a villian cause ai isnt the bad entity making all these things happen its like saying a gun murders people and not the wielder of the gun that pulled the trigger
AI in prototypes? Then don't release the game before it's complete!
Well said.
I mean, many people bought Scarlet and Violet, an unfinished game...
@@iToonNetworkOffical Your logic is flawed because the ai part is temporary.
@@gryphonphillips5669 "AI in prototypes?" I never said "AI in the full game?"
@@iToonNetworkOffical ignore him, he sucks off everything terrible about modern rovio
i think mcdonalds also udes ai art on their restaurants, or maybe not.
in Mcdonalds (or at least on the one is close to my location) there are like these poster about a roblox game or something using these Mcdonald workers in anime style. since the style of the ad is kinda ai like I don't really know. idk if anybody else has talked about this.
Here's my point in all this, but I know it might piss off some people: I don't mind Rovio using AI to prototype the game, but the problem is that they should've made it CLEAR with everyone that the game was still in early access.
If this game was branded as being in early access, that would've solved SO MANY problems Rovio could've had with marketing and making the game, because if the players are aware of what's made with AI, and that it's all subject to change, nobody would've complained.
I don't mind creators using AI to assist in asset development, I really don't understand why people hate AI for exising so much, but the point is that Rovio was using AI in the way they should, but should've made it clear to people playing the game that the assets were temporary.
Exactly on the part, "I really don’t understand why people hate AI for existing so much."
Smartest person in the comments
Agreed, using AI for concepts and ideas is fine, and I think some people need to realize that. Especially since AI isn't leaving any time soon.
But I also agree with some people's arguments with how AI is being used right now.
They are a company, and should be paying artists, even for prototypes and ideas.
@@so12productions Understandable. People have been using AI in shitty ways, I can't deny that, but I don't think it's an excuse to hate AI as a whole. Yes, we should stop people from using AI in shitty ways, but AI does have it's benefits as well. But this is as far as I'll go on this matter, cuz I don't want a war in the replies.
I can probably see the use of AI art for like- temporary thumbnails for the game as it develops
Because I don't think artists would want to redraw every new concept, but again that's a bit of a controversial statement-
How long before Rovio’s CEO brings out their Ukulele?
I don't know.
But why would They have a ukulele?
@@diegcon0 it's a reference to Colleen's "apology" video
@@diegcon0How do you not know 🤬👊?
You do realize that Colleen's situation was much more worse than this, right 💀
@@LightningAdrian I mean yeah, AI being used for human tasks is bad, but never as worse as ruining a child's life
I think it would’ve been fine if it was a mistake that it got out, because I think that early stage prototype stuff is some of the only things that AI images should be used for. However, they put it out for the world to see, which I don’t think was a good thing. I do hope that Rovio learn from this, and I’m also glad that they only trained it on their own stuff
I think you're nitpicking beyond belief. If it's their ai, being trained in art they feed it, it's absolutely fine, both morally and legally.
Uh, I dont think they have enough art internally even to train an AI. They are likely using a base model which has been pre trained unethically and only fine tuning with rovio art (if at all).
@anon6383 Angry birds came out in 2009, and has over 140 projects under their belt. Im sure they have plenty of art to feed it. And again, you obviously dont know for sure and are reaching.
@@zerik_media haha buddy sure i am the one reaching. Do you have any idea about the monetary costs to train a model from scratch. If they had that much cash, they could have just hired an artist you know.
Didn’t even fix the artifacts. They actually don’t care. 🤦♂️
At least they admit it. Some just ignore about it.
I mean... what's the matter? If the AI is built internally and trained on their own work, why is it so bad that they used it for a prototype? The wrong details are just wrong details that most people won't notice nor care about.
Another "AI bad because AI bad" video. At least I now know to avoid any of your future videos with the word "AI" in it
This is technically what AI is meant for, its meant for prototyping and concepts but not as a final product, Its fine that they are using it for speeding up concepts, btu they should really be getting people to remake and clean the images properly before beta if this is the direction they are going. It's just like the guy that said "The graphics are the first thing a game finishes, controls and missions are done later".
Good news, guys!
The game got delisted. :)
Nice, no more angry bird microtransactions
If you guys really hate Rovio that much, then how come you're still playing what the Angry Bird franchise has to offer?
0:36 Vailskibum barf is giving me a laugh.
Rovio, please just do Angry Birds 3 for God's sake...
Rovio: 'Damn, fans didn't like that, we should change this and be more cautious..'
Rovio after taking 80% of all angry bird games off the app store: 'Damn, fans didn't like that, oh well.'
Why do you care if a prototype or promotional art is made with AI art? You'd also complain if they asked people to draw for them for free. Using AI for prototypes before hiring someone to make the real product sounds like a completely normal and fine thing to me.
Besides, even if they are lying, what's wrong with using AI for a promotional picture? The fact that it's AI? How is that bad? Because it's AI? Endless loop with no real explanation other than unjustified anger.
I mean im an artist and hate a.i. but if they only use it for prototypes or beta builds and its only based off of their own art and products it is fine. its not going to be used for the final product. if it is used for the final product then ill be pissed. but something like this I feel like is fine.
I don't have a problem with Ai art
*But!*
It's their game, and they have the creative freedom to develop it however they choose. If it's not to your liking, you can simply choose not to play it. its literally just an ai photo, you are being a content farm rn. In this case, the AI-generated photo is just a part of their artistic vision, and there's nothing inherently wrong with that.
*Oohhh response..!*
That aint Block Quest
Thats AB x Block Blast collaboration 💀