Joe, you would notice that in the Carlill case, the terms and /or conditions were made clear-that is the exact things the customer had to do to qualify for the reward, thus the principle of definiteness was satisfied, hence it was a good offer. Thanks for your comment and keep watching
This video l is helpful 👍
Please we need more of contract Law posts from you👌
In fact, you are the best. I have got the best out of you. I would prefer you to make a combined video of the entire contract law ❤
Noted
Great submission 🎉
I'll be glad if you have specific videos on cases associated with each element
❤ Thank you
You're welcome 😊
Thank you, this was very helpful. Would be glad to see you post more on Contract law.
More to come!
Very helpful. Please do more of this
Helpful!
Glad it was helpful!
What of the calill vs carbolic smoke ball case
Joe, you would notice that in the Carlill case, the terms and /or conditions were made clear-that is the exact things the customer had to do to qualify for the reward, thus the principle of definiteness was satisfied, hence it was a good offer.
Thanks for your comment and keep watching