That is such a stupid sentence. "A legendary priest minion in a one-only deck has been seen as a one off in a priest deck" Oh really, what else, in hearthstone?
Ultimate Crystal Core 5 Mana Deal 5 Damage, Draw 5 Cards, Summon a 5/5, Destroy 5 Enemy minions, gain 5 Armor, gain 5 Health, your minions get +5 / +5, Summon 5 Jade Golems, Shuffle 5 Jade Idols into your deck, win 5 games, get to legend rank 5. Should be balanced
I know its a bit of a meme at this point where "Oh, trumps reviews are so bad" but in all honesty I love seeing these videos as kind of like a metagame analysis. It gives a little bit of insight in how a card can sneak up and really be a metagame terror and what cards to look out for in the future.
@@a3cer76 all these people that laugh at 1 archetype are kinda shooting themselves in a foot cuz u know blizz will release that 1 card that will push it and then who laughs xd
I'm struggling to find a volume where I can hear past Trump clearly, without having present Trump blow my ears out. I think their relative volumes should be slightly closer to each other.
Frost Lich Jaina 2 stars? Doesn't fit in Control Mage? Will see rapid decline? Nowadays, it's the absolute biggest win condition in Control Mage. What has changed?
34:48 (Non-mill) Valeera Deathknight decks have this weird "midrange" timetable for defeating your opponent when you don't get early god draw Edwin. If the game takes too long, you'll eventually get out valued by your opponent. Turn 9 Deathknight into turn 10 Vanish with all the Arcane Giant shenanigans. And then you attempt to kill your opponent ASAP before they are able to play out all the cards you just sent to their hand.
+JBennet9571 It can, but not often. It is so aggressive that unless the enemy has an endless stream of removal (and that right kind of removal), you usually overwhelm them lategame. Aggro vs aggro, then it gets interesting.
Haha Trump can't predict the future! It's not like everyone else who reviewed the cards before they came out without seeing how the meta reacted or how actually good certain cards were got any of their reviews wrong. Nope. Just Trump.
Trump's changed the rating system. Now it's just 5-star if in tier 1, 4-star if in tier 2, etc. with +1 star if it defines that deck. It used to be: 5: *defines* a tier 1 deck or appears in multiple tier 1 decks 4: appears in (but doesn't define) a tier 1 deck or defines a tier 2 deck 3: occasional tech in tier 1 or appears in tier 2 decks 2: occasionally appears in tier 2 or below 1: never played in a serious deck
19:43 "Has to break 2 divine shields quickly, and thats hard to do" Steward of Darkshire Much? In my paladin deck, I've gotten the weapon easilly up to 5+
This is what I most look forward to from you. I wish more streamers would analyze their reviews. Alas, this is great content and looking forward to the review of the review of the review!
I think warlock is better than tier 3, if it's the proper deck played by a good warlock player, it easily competes with the tier 1 decks on a regular basis.
You're right but the same can be said of most decks. Some guy reached rank 1 legend with hunter, so it can compete with tier 1 decks in the hands of a skilled player. But for the majority of people playing warlock or hunter they're going to be tier 3 decks.
If the enemy does not have enough removal after Warlock DK goes off, then it is GG. That can happen pretty often, but not often enough for it to be a good deck. Warlock can get killed before the DK goes off, the enemy hits his face with spells, or produces a board stronger than his.
You know, Cryostasis actually isn't too bad with Runic egg or Shieldbearer on curve, since 0 attack minions unfreeze at the end of your turn almost 100% of the time (A bit buggy sometimes). And if you don't draw any of those combo pieces and drop a totem instead, Hyldnir Frostrider has the same effect on turn 3. The 4/4 statline makes up for the rare whiff on the 1-2 RE/SB-CS combo. If these cards are implemented properly, it makes a tier 3 deck to be sure. The rest of freeze Shaman is abhorrent, though.
Warrior's stock is going to drop so hard on the rotation (unless they get some REALLY good stuff in Kobolds & Catacombs) that I honestly think they're going to start running Rotface just out of sheer desperation.
do you think the fatigue mirrors will be a problem on ladder? i am currently playing the dead mans hand warrior very excessively, but today i ran into an unusual amount of priests with benedictus and other dead mans hand warriors, the latter resulted in two stubborn warriors with 230 armor each both blowing up after 30 minutes, gaining nothing.
I feel like Hunter needs some sort of late game control legendary that does something based on how many 3 mana cards you have in your deck, if we're gonna see a true control Hunter, ya know? Also, I think the only reason Toxic arrow exists is because, in wild, you can go Dreadscale + Houndmaster + Toxic Arrow for 9 mana. It's essentially the Hunter's clunky version of Twisting Nether. :v In standard, you have a... worse? version of this for 10 mana: Bloatbat + Houndmaster +Toxic Arrow. The difference is that your opponent has a chance to silence the effect before it works, and when it goes off, you'll still have houndmaster alive.
I wonder why I got a Mercedes GT-R commercial on this video, it's not like 5% of the people who watch trumps hearthstone video could afford a 175 000$ car
So can anyone help me understand why he gave Scourgelord Garrosh and Blood Razor a five star rating even though it mostly sees play in dead mans hand fatigue warrior which he himself rated a tier 3 deck. He mentions that Blood Razor sees play in a variety of control warriors but the only kind of control warrior that currently exists in the meta is the dead mans hand one. When he spoke about Scourgelord Garrosh he also only talked about the dead mans hand deck.
i've played priest zoo and actually did pretty well. i also made a murloc priest deck with shadow ascendant and did even better. it's basically murloc pally but with priest class cards in place of the paladin class murlocs. so obviously it's worse than murloc pally, but priest's hero power naturally synergizes with murlocs. it's not as bad as you'd think, but it's got to be a lot worse since the warleader nerf. when i tried it, it performed quite well. bonemare and kabal talonpriest work really well with murlocs, and coldlight seer works really well with lesser heal.
Another graph at the end showing all the current ratings of cards is needed. That way we can compare to the existing graph of what trump rated when the set first came out (the graph already at the end of the video).
Anduin turned out to be extraordinarily powerful and exceeded its initial impact on the community, I feel that this card will be nerfed somehow in the future. However, blizzard is terrible with nerfs and so before anyone screams at me that this card is balanced because it needs raza to work, if both drop on the board, its a win unless the priest gets insanely unlucky with their draw. So the nerf that I expect to see is it will become 9 mana, but what I want to see is +1 mana cost every time their hero power resets that turn (restarts each turn). I feel this would be a good change overall which would limit the number of times each turn the hero power is played to 2 on average.
I think archbishop might see more play due to the fact that in my opinion it's a straight up hard counter to mill warrior/deadman's hand warrior. If dead man's hand warrior becomes a tier 1 in the meta deck, this becomes a possibly perfect counter to it since it gives you the dead man's hand combo while you also have a better hero power. HOWEVER, if the priest deck can still kill the warrior without it without problem then there's no need for the card.
If you listen to Trump's explanations he's actually pretty accurate/close with evaluating individual cards. He always takes the time to say "this card is actually good if a deck comes up for it" so I don't think people can really argue his ability to evaluate individual cards -- it's more that he's just not perfect at predicting an entire meta.
Trump what do u think of doing deck ratings on individual cards? This includes all cards and potential swaps or future iterations and where you think the deck will go in the future. I think this would be a popular series and I would personally watch every episode
Seems like the original review footage is playing at a lower volume than the recent footage. If this is intentional, I would suggest lowering the differences in volume.
22:30 not even mentioning OTK pally? might be a surprise to you but its actually not a troll deck and is DEFINED by uther (obviously lol), so for defining a lets say tier 3/4 deck it should get 3 stars?
I just discovered something interesting your new view of Nerubian Prophet is the same feeling you had about skulking geist if Machine Gun Priest becomes a thing Nerubian is the tech card making their spells cost two more to cast.
He did pretty well with the ratings this time, well done Trump! I remember everyone was ripping into you when you were reviewing the cards initially..!
Hey trump, I'd like to suggest a change to your rating system to increase accuracy and to distinguish between "occasional tech cards" in tier 1 decks and the meta-defining best cards. Just add a 0 star rating. 5 stars - defining card in a tier 1 deck 4 stars - average card in a tier 1 deck or a defining card in a tier 2 deck 3 stars - average tier 2, defining tier 3 2 stars - average tier 3 etc. 1 star - some experimentation 0 stars - no play
27:50 A legendary minion, in a Kazakus deck "as a one of" ...
A priest class card "has seen play competitive in PRIEST decks"
"One of the worst weapons in KFC"
I'm sure he's referring to frostmourne lol
That is such a stupid sentence.
"A legendary priest minion in a one-only deck has been seen as a one off in a priest deck" Oh really, what else, in hearthstone?
Trump has clearly lost his passion!!!!!!!
27:58 really? Only as a one of? I play 2 Benedictuses in every priest deck
Hunter Freeman I play 3 m8 get on my level
Fools I play 5 using both the brewmasters
Benedictusii
Now you actually can in a Wild Deck, so JOKES ON YOU! xDD
Trump got:
81 cards exactly right
22 cards wrong by one
19 cards wrong by two
12 cards wrong by three
1 card wrong by four
He did reeeeally better than the ungoro one! Way to go Trumpo!
Most cards he get wrong are all in big priest, guess he didnt envision the deck
Maybe he got a better "result" because the meta didn't spawn as many new decks as Ungoro, though :/
A exact 60%, nearly passed.
According to his own correction
Ultimate infestation
10 mana deal 5 damage, Summon a 5/5, gain 5 armor and draw 5 cards...
... and be *5 star!*
Wotplaya4 Should've been *5 MANA* MegaLUL
It should also give your minions +5 +5 just to fit the theme
if we just go for the whole 5 theme blizzard maybe should rename the card to "The Ultimate Caverns Below"
Not good enough, needs to summon 5 5/5s to fit the theme keepo
Ultimate Crystal Core
5 Mana
Deal 5 Damage, Draw 5 Cards, Summon a 5/5, Destroy 5 Enemy minions, gain 5 Armor, gain 5 Health, your minions get +5 / +5, Summon 5 Jade Golems, Shuffle 5 Jade Idols into your deck, win 5 games, get to legend rank 5.
Should be balanced
59:50 WHAT WAS HE THINKING!? HOW COULDN'T HE HAVE PREDICTED THE TILLER OTK!!?!?!? I AM SHOCKED
This is just as bad as his Dr. Boom miss, a real travesty
Nothing like some hot Trump on Trump action!
I for one look forward to the trump threesome in a few months
Joel Salyer up you go
Gotta love when trump specifies that archbishop benedictus would only be run as a single copy in a deck
Technically correct
you only run one? what are you? a madman?!?!
The best kind of correct
Trumps Reviews two months early? THE MADMAN!
"Haha, Trump!" - Priest
Trump Reviews Trump Reviews Trump Reviews?!?!?!
My dream has come true!
yo dawg
we put some reviews in your review so you can review while you review
T H E M E T A M A N
Just you wait for Trump Reviews Trump Reviews Trump Reviews Trump Reviews! Then shit's really gonna get wild!
I know its a bit of a meme at this point where "Oh, trumps reviews are so bad" but in all honesty I love seeing these videos as kind of like a metagame analysis. It gives a little bit of insight in how a card can sneak up and really be a metagame terror and what cards to look out for in the future.
This video: 5 stars!
Saronite Chain Gang is truly magical. At one moment it's 4 stars (1:05:42), while in another it's 3 stars (1:26:17).
27:57 I'm really surprised Archbishop Benedictus, when run, was only run as a one of.
HAHAHA FREEZE SHAMAN
Little did they know, 4 years later...
@@a3cer76 all these people that laugh at 1 archetype are kinda shooting themselves in a foot cuz u know blizz will release that 1 card that will push it and then who laughs xd
Trump Reviews Trump Reviews takes 1 hour and 28 minutes. Too slow for the meta, 1 Star.
Haha Trump!
19:50 "Welcome to the worst weapon in KFC"
I don’t really like their sporks they give you. Not even an effective single wield
love these trump reviews trump reviews videos! got more excited over this than the newest trolden video
19:50
the worst weapon in KFC.
now that I know this, life has no meaning.
Victor Holowinski He must have been hungry. #ripKernel
When you rate a legendary 2 stars because it saw play but only as a one of. He's right, no one would play 2.
I'm struggling to find a volume where I can hear past Trump clearly, without having present Trump blow my ears out. I think their relative volumes should be slightly closer to each other.
Frost Lich Jaina 2 stars?
Doesn't fit in Control Mage?
Will see rapid decline?
Nowadays, it's the absolute biggest win condition in Control Mage.
What has changed?
Why is Moorabi even a card, like holy shit is this the single worst card ever printed? Like even Acidmaw had SOME *MINISCULE* entertainment value.
Brenden Holmes honestly the card if just offensive
Someone forgot to playtest it.
Because blizzard plans expansions ahead. It might be good in next expansion if shaman gets the right tools for freeze synergy
DarkValentine Yeah well lots of cards don't get better even after 3-4 more expansions
31:20 Laughs in Kingsbane
I love watching Trump review Trump! Can't wait for the review of the review of the review.
The face Trump was paused on while discussing Devour mind is hilarious. Reminds of the BoJack sneezing picture
Play on x1.25 speed for normal human being speed and 1.5 speed for 'i only have 45 min' edition.
Blublayze This comment was really helpful, thanks
2.0x for grad students default :).
34:48 (Non-mill) Valeera Deathknight decks have this weird "midrange" timetable for defeating your opponent when you don't get early god draw Edwin. If the game takes too long, you'll eventually get out valued by your opponent. Turn 9 Deathknight into turn 10 Vanish with all the Arcane Giant shenanigans. And then you attempt to kill your opponent ASAP before they are able to play out all the cards you just sent to their hand.
Trump review-trump reviews-trump reviews in 2 months? THE MADMAN
Oh look at all those awsome decks that are absolutely unplayable because Blizzard still did not want to cure Jade Cancer.....
Orkan lol i did see only one jade druid since the nerfs and that guy won because of a misplay of mine, the deck is pretty much gone
I just noticed how chubby frost lich Jaina looks. Really packing on that winter coat.
thicc
Anyone have a link to that top legend hunter deck trump was talking about?
Huk6 I don't have a link but if you search hearthstone Reddit for stitched tracker face hunter you'll find it
Search hearthpwn for hunter legend deck
Huk6 its on the first page of hearthpwn. I used it from rank 18 and im now rank 8. It is good, but against control decks it can struggle.
Found it. Thanks for the help.
+JBennet9571 It can, but not often. It is so aggressive that unless the enemy has an endless stream of removal (and that right kind of removal), you usually overwhelm them lategame. Aggro vs aggro, then it gets interesting.
Haha Trump can't predict the future! It's not like everyone else who reviewed the cards before they came out without seeing how the meta reacted or how actually good certain cards were got any of their reviews wrong. Nope. Just Trump.
This one is probably his best expansion prediction yet, actually.
feel the same ... his predictions weren't really that far off ... and better then most others i watched.
Give credit where credit is due.
Actually his prediction was pretty good this time around
2 star frost lich jaina in 2020 OMEGALUL
22:18 (10:18 pm)
Thanks trump, you promote the fact that sleep is overrated.
3:18pm
22:43 Where are you living? I'm at Austria.
Wait, did they remove timezones in the last patch?
Vorname Nachname this comment so stupid in so many levels of stupidity
i get out of work at 11h30... what are you talking bout
33:17 Look at the paused Trump's eyes. He was studying this expansion so hard, he actually became undead...!
Trumpopo~, I would always rate you 1 star because I know... You will prove yourself 5 stars.
Rapid Fire Ratings time displayed at the start of the video? Praise Jens.
But I'm gonna watch the whole video anyway.
But of course!
Trump Reviews Trump Reviews Trump Reviews...
Reviewception. You never go 3 Reviews deep.
What a madman!
Trump's changed the rating system. Now it's just 5-star if in tier 1, 4-star if in tier 2, etc. with +1 star if it defines that deck. It used to be:
5: *defines* a tier 1 deck or appears in multiple tier 1 decks
4: appears in (but doesn't define) a tier 1 deck or defines a tier 2 deck
3: occasional tech in tier 1 or appears in tier 2 decks
2: occasionally appears in tier 2 or below
1: never played in a serious deck
19:43 "Has to break 2 divine shields quickly, and thats hard to do" Steward of Darkshire Much? In my paladin deck, I've gotten the weapon easilly up to 5+
27:50
Master Trump feels the need to emphasise that a Priest Legendary only saw play in Priest decks... as a "one of"
Oh Trump
I'm glad we'll finally get a Trump reviews Trump reviews Trump reviews: Knights of the Frozen Throne.
This is what I most look forward to from you. I wish more streamers would analyze their reviews. Alas, this is great content and looking forward to the review of the review of the review!
"haHAA Freeze Shaman" (2017, Trump)
27:00 love how annoyed he looked when Embrace Darkness popped up lmao
35:48 best part
@Trump: Your skills are growing. Tough task predicting ALL new possible decks, indeed. @Jens: Tight edit. Thanks.
I think warlock is better than tier 3, if it's the proper deck played by a good warlock player, it easily competes with the tier 1 decks on a regular basis.
You're right but the same can be said of most decks. Some guy reached rank 1 legend with hunter, so it can compete with tier 1 decks in the hands of a skilled player. But for the majority of people playing warlock or hunter they're going to be tier 3 decks.
Brenden Holmes well that can be said about every class
If the enemy does not have enough removal after Warlock DK goes off, then it is GG. That can happen pretty often, but not often enough for it to be a good deck. Warlock can get killed before the DK goes off, the enemy hits his face with spells, or produces a board stronger than his.
You know, Cryostasis actually isn't too bad with Runic egg or Shieldbearer on curve, since 0 attack minions unfreeze at the end of your turn almost 100% of the time (A bit buggy sometimes). And if you don't draw any of those combo pieces and drop a totem instead, Hyldnir Frostrider has the same effect on turn 3. The 4/4 statline makes up for the rare whiff on the 1-2 RE/SB-CS combo. If these cards are implemented properly, it makes a tier 3 deck to be sure. The rest of freeze Shaman is abhorrent, though.
Warrior's stock is going to drop so hard on the rotation (unless they get some REALLY good stuff in Kobolds & Catacombs) that I honestly think they're going to start running Rotface just out of sheer desperation.
The benedictus dude would be a great counter to dead man's hand warrior wouldn't it?
seriously Moorabi can be 5mana 5/5 card easily. Get all the 5mana 5/5 on the board as much as possible with potential blood lust.
50:10 Old Trump is like: Dayum, have to smoke all those 1 Star cards
14:16 Do you also see the pun being 1 star after the nerf as well?
"H A H A F R E E Z E S H A M A N"
I'm having a lot of fun with my Moorabi/Evolve freeze shaman!
...Once my rank stabilized at 20, that is.
I don't know if I can handle this much adorkable.
do you think the fatigue mirrors will be a problem on ladder? i am currently playing the dead mans hand warrior very excessively, but today i ran into an unusual amount of priests with benedictus and other dead mans hand warriors, the latter resulted in two stubborn warriors with 230 armor each both blowing up after 30 minutes, gaining nothing.
Always my fave type of video of yours. Nice one.
I feel like Hunter needs some sort of late game control legendary that does something based on how many 3 mana cards you have in your deck, if we're gonna see a true control Hunter, ya know?
Also, I think the only reason Toxic arrow exists is because, in wild, you can go Dreadscale + Houndmaster + Toxic Arrow for 9 mana. It's essentially the Hunter's clunky version of Twisting Nether. :v In standard, you have a... worse? version of this for 10 mana: Bloatbat + Houndmaster +Toxic Arrow. The difference is that your opponent has a chance to silence the effect before it works, and when it goes off, you'll still have houndmaster alive.
I wonder why I got a Mercedes GT-R commercial on this video, it's not like 5% of the people who watch trumps hearthstone video could afford a 175 000$ car
Quite good reviews this time around, definitely better than before
I wouldnt run obsidian statue in razakus but i do enjoy discovering it from Stonehill Defender
19:46 Wasn't aware one could bring a weapon in a KFC
So, Should I dust Professor Putricide? I got the golden one
And Moorabi too, which I also have? (not the golden)
TheBlockyBird Thanks for the advice.
And Putricide???????
According to Trump, people are running the Priest legendary card "in some Razakus decks as a one of" lol 27:55
Trump predicts a control meta? Welp, strap in for the return of face hunter or something equally aggro.
Not face hunter... but token shamans a lot better with less spreading plague around
So can anyone help me understand why he gave Scourgelord Garrosh and Blood Razor a five star rating even though it mostly sees play in dead mans hand fatigue warrior which he himself rated a tier 3 deck. He mentions that Blood Razor sees play in a variety of control warriors but the only kind of control warrior that currently exists in the meta is the dead mans hand one. When he spoke about Scourgelord Garrosh he also only talked about the dead mans hand deck.
16:00 I've been playing elemental mage a lot. I'm doing pretty good with it
Your definition of "pretty good" may differ from that of others.
I can't wait for Trump Reviews Trump Reviews Trump Reviews: The Trumpining
i've played priest zoo and actually did pretty well. i also made a murloc priest deck with shadow ascendant and did even better. it's basically murloc pally but with priest class cards in place of the paladin class murlocs. so obviously it's worse than murloc pally, but priest's hero power naturally synergizes with murlocs. it's not as bad as you'd think, but it's got to be a lot worse since the warleader nerf. when i tried it, it performed quite well. bonemare and kabal talonpriest work really well with murlocs, and coldlight seer works really well with lesser heal.
Another graph at the end showing all the current ratings of cards is needed. That way we can compare to the existing graph of what trump rated when the set first came out (the graph already at the end of the video).
I don’t think anyone could have predicted leeching poison getting nerfed
21:44 Every pro player thought Uther death knight was overpowered pre expansion. Guess not.
Anduin turned out to be extraordinarily powerful and exceeded its initial impact on the community, I feel that this card will be nerfed somehow in the future. However, blizzard is terrible with nerfs and so before anyone screams at me that this card is balanced because it needs raza to work, if both drop on the board, its a win unless the priest gets insanely unlucky with their draw. So the nerf that I expect to see is it will become 9 mana, but what I want to see is +1 mana cost every time their hero power resets that turn (restarts each turn). I feel this would be a good change overall which would limit the number of times each turn the hero power is played to 2 on average.
I thought I was going to have a 5-star day today, but unfortunately, it turned out to be a 2-star day, the only saving grace being this video.
"Hahaha freeze shaman!"
That's pretty much literally all he needed to say in the first place to defend his reviews. XD
Druid always plays from behind. > : > )
This expansion in a nutshell:
Druid, 5 stars!
Priest, 5 stars!
Everything else, 1 star!
Your enjoyment of Hearthstone, 1 star!
how can you possibly give uther of the ebon blade 2 stars lmao
I think archbishop might see more play due to the fact that in my opinion it's a straight up hard counter to mill warrior/deadman's hand warrior. If dead man's hand warrior becomes a tier 1 in the meta deck, this becomes a possibly perfect counter to it since it gives you the dead man's hand combo while you also have a better hero power.
HOWEVER, if the priest deck can still kill the warrior without it without problem then there's no need for the card.
Sayanos o.o I don't think you get the combo since they can only have 1 copy in deck unless you use it early
If you listen to Trump's explanations he's actually pretty accurate/close with evaluating individual cards. He always takes the time to say "this card is actually good if a deck comes up for it" so I don't think people can really argue his ability to evaluate individual cards -- it's more that he's just not perfect at predicting an entire meta.
I like Trump, but the HAHA "Insert deck" Joke, killed me on the inside.
I'll be honest I've ripped Trump pretty hard for the accuracy of his recent card reviews in the past, but he was pretty on point with this one.
Trump what do u think of doing deck ratings on individual cards? This includes all cards and potential swaps or future iterations and where you think the deck will go in the future. I think this would be a popular series and I would personally watch every episode
I guess "Haha - Freeze Shaman!" is the new "Haha - Priest!" now?
Seems like the original review footage is playing at a lower volume than the recent footage. If this is intentional, I would suggest lowering the differences in volume.
What the Hell? Frost Lich Jaina was in EVERY mage deck during this time. Trump is nuts.
22:30 not even mentioning OTK pally? might be a surprise to you but its actually not a troll deck and is DEFINED by uther (obviously lol), so for defining a lets say tier 3/4 deck it should get 3 stars?
trump's outro: has snowflipper penguin... 1 star! ahaha
By your definition, shouldn't Penguin be 2*? It's part of the OTK priest combo.
had a golden glacial mysteries and a golden spectral pillager.... free dust everywhere ^^ TY bilzz.
46:58 "Haha! Memes!"
I need a clip of that.
My favorite Part of this Video: 37:00-... Freeze Shaman :D
I just discovered something interesting your new view of Nerubian Prophet is the same feeling you had about skulking geist if Machine Gun Priest becomes a thing Nerubian is the tech card making their spells cost two more to cast.
19:49
"Welcome to the worst weapon of the KFC!"
Mmmm, yummy...
He did pretty well with the ratings this time, well done Trump! I remember everyone was ripping into you when you were reviewing the cards initially..!
Leeching Poison - HOW DO YOU RA ... Oh. Right. No Kingsbane. No Broken Uncounterable Weapon.
Hey trump, I'd like to suggest a change to your rating system to increase accuracy and to distinguish between "occasional tech cards" in tier 1 decks and the meta-defining best cards. Just add a 0 star rating.
5 stars - defining card in a tier 1 deck
4 stars - average card in a tier 1 deck or a defining card in a tier 2 deck
3 stars - average tier 2, defining tier 3
2 stars - average tier 3 etc.
1 star - some experimentation
0 stars - no play
27:53 Wait, you mean they don't run 2 of a legendary minion in their lists? amateurs.