Total Defeat! Russia's Iskander Crushes HIMARS Convoy in Kherson!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 янв 2025

Комментарии • 331

  • @eliasyassin3853
    @eliasyassin3853 13 дней назад +208

    Technological superiority? Really give me a break. What I witnessed is the wests propaganda superiority not the weapons. Every so called game changer western weapons being destroyed by Russia.

    • @gillesgangneux2880
      @gillesgangneux2880 13 дней назад +2

      C'est la russie qui parle de ses armes invincible

    • @bl8danjil
      @bl8danjil 13 дней назад +4

      Who keeps telling you our weapons were game changers? Russian propaganda.

    • @Dudupol
      @Dudupol 13 дней назад +1

      @@gillesgangneux2880 😅 BFMtv visiblement vous lave tès bien le cerveau...et l'orthographe par la même occasion... 😅😅😅 clown!

    • @jessec4677
      @jessec4677 13 дней назад

      @@bl8danjil Yeah! Damn that BBC and their Russian propaganda! ("Ukraine: What are Himars missiles and are they changing the war?" - BBC headline August 2022) so STFU

    • @jessec4677
      @jessec4677 13 дней назад

      It's the majority over here that thinks we don't face propaganda of our own. Which means the West is hands-down the best at it.

  • @lovealways2609
    @lovealways2609 13 дней назад +211

    Hi-mars = best, the west has.
    Iskander = Not, the best ruxzia has, but enough to beat the west.

    • @merdalors5661
      @merdalors5661 13 дней назад

      The west is not fully engaged there, we all know that i suppose...

    • @Judaism_Terror
      @Judaism_Terror 13 дней назад +20

      Outdated western weapon
      Advanced Russia weapon

    • @rjyfjk-s4o
      @rjyfjk-s4o 13 дней назад +2

      free giveaway to Ukraine

    • @CHRISTOPHEROSSAI-j3m
      @CHRISTOPHEROSSAI-j3m 13 дней назад +13

      Hi,mers never lived up to the hype the claimed,!if that its all the west has as a high tech, then Russia is way superior!!!name one western weapon system,that out parforms that of Russia?? just one please!!

    • @TxChristopher
      @TxChristopher 13 дней назад

      Damn you are stupid, HIMARS is old technology that we are replacing. Missiles for it stopped being produced long ago.

  • @thetrumpnewsnetwork7503
    @thetrumpnewsnetwork7503 13 дней назад +55

    Shift what balance? Ukraine has been steadily losing.

  • @lastsam9846
    @lastsam9846 13 дней назад +195

    Iskander Missile system has proved itself on the battlefield. Impossible to intercept by NATO, simply invincible.

    • @alexraptors95
      @alexraptors95 13 дней назад +5

      Only if you ignore the fact that they have been intercepted many times. They're just a short range ballistic missile bro, many nations around the world can field and intercept them. Not just western nations either.

    • @bernib8353
      @bernib8353 13 дней назад +2

      alexraptors95 O, fool...

    • @denxero
      @denxero 13 дней назад +7

      @@alexraptors95 yeah some people just comment like hooligans.
      It's in fact hilarious that even this rudimentary missile turns out being so effective in this war. But then again, Ukraine is basically out of air defense, so why bother with advanced technology.

    • @denxero
      @denxero 13 дней назад +8

      In fact it's not that the missile itself has something special on its own, it's the RF's increasing capabilities in logistics, deployment, and the reduction between detecting a target and effectively striking it that are doing all the difference. And the progress since 2022 is nothing short of impressive.

    • @6.6.12
      @6.6.12 13 дней назад

      ​@@alexraptors95😂 как можно перехватить Искандер ? У него Скорость 6 МAX 320 метров в /секунду .Есть 30 Видео в Интернете где Искандер уничтожает ПВО НАТО как IRIS T ,NASAMS и Patriot это враньё .На участке в запуске он маниврирует ,дальше в процессе в зоне ПВО он ещё раз маниврирует по непредсказуемой траектории в 2-3 раза .Что бы его сбить нужно минимум 7-9 ракет от Patriot. Одна ракета Patriot стоит 1 Миллион 200 тысяч долларов. Так это ещё не факт .Считаем 17 миллионов доларов на один Искандер .Проблема в том ,что летит 2 ракета .Кстате Русские модорнезировали Искандер М они снизили Боевую часть с 480кг до 243кг .Искандер 1000 .Ракета стала лететь на 1000км -1,120 км и больше маневрировать .Так же любая Искандер может нести до 50-80 килотон ЯО .Это Гиперзвуковая ракета с 2002 года .В 2024 году произвадство этих ракет с 2023 году выросло на 18,5 процентов .

  • @Ghastly_Grinner
    @Ghastly_Grinner 13 дней назад +114

    Himars was never a game changer it failed miserably

    • @oldhag2881
      @oldhag2881 13 дней назад +14

      Overhyped and overpriced.

    • @bl8danjil
      @bl8danjil 13 дней назад +1

      Yet it still wiped out plenty of troops and tanks.

    • @Ghastly_Grinner
      @Ghastly_Grinner 13 дней назад +7

      @bl8danjil not enough to be considered anything besides a total failure

    • @TxChristopher
      @TxChristopher 13 дней назад +1

      ​@Ghastly_Grinner you just described the entire 3 day Special Military Operation!

    • @sarifsamudra9970
      @sarifsamudra9970 10 дней назад

      @@bl8danjil Compare to the Drone that was 71-77% output destroy of Ukraine Arms that was crazy different

  • @Youcomeasuare
    @Youcomeasuare 13 дней назад +86

    I always laugh when the reports of western "game changer" weapons used by ukraine enter the battle field. 1980's equipment can be lethal, but NOT a game changer.

    • @bl8danjil
      @bl8danjil 13 дней назад +1

      😂 Yup, 1980's stuff. NATO isn't giving Ukraine its top of the line stuff. It's actually impressive that Ukraine held out against Russia for this long with NATO's cold war era equipment against Russian modern equipment.

    • @Deucemuse
      @Deucemuse 13 дней назад

      @@bl8danjil Against Russian shovels? C'mon now.

    • @GoranSton
      @GoranSton 12 дней назад

      @@bl8danjil STOP MISSINFORMING bcs Russia also mostly used its OLD wepons from 60s-70s-80s-90s and only selectively used bit more modern but for like 90% of times it used old stuff.Even these bombs are basicaly 60s-70s-80s tech with just updated/upgraded chipset,the rest is old stuff.
      People are so rbainles OLD STUFF IS SOMEWHAT OK/GOOD IT JUST DEPENDS ON HOW ITS OPERATED AND THE HUMAN WHO OPERATES IT.
      Yugoslavian military was succesful in detering,damaging,taking down F-15/16 and sucesfuly taking down F-117 PRd by west as untouchable,unkilable,invisible with 60s-70s system that was basicaly needing repairs bcs Yugoslavia like many other countries didnt regulary maintain their equipment but used it as long as it can be pushed with just nessesary repairs after something breaks down.
      Thats one of the reasons when NATO officialy illegaly started bombings( unofficialy it started attack raids,bombings a year before officialy was announced to the public and was more of a specific/limited targets) Yugoslavia barely had 2 Mig-29 that were in decent condition,had like 1 additional Mig-29 that basicaly was in/was slated for maintanance that was used wich didnt have working radar and had problems with the switches to activate the rockets.
      Most repelings of F-15/16s and other variants by Yugoslavian army was mostly done by TRAINING PLANES that were basialy half assedly/quicly refited to be a semi fighter jet + 2 Mig-29s that were in decent shape (needed maintanace) and 1 Mig-29 that didnt have radar and switches to launch some of the rockets + remnants of Mig 21 that remained somewhat intact after the NATO raids,while some Mig 21s and 29s in more better conditions were stolen by croatian separatists weeks before the war broke out by croatian generals via documenst/papers putig the planes for repairs and transporting them to repair shops that were in Bosnia,Croatia.

    • @tonyp2865
      @tonyp2865 8 дней назад

      @@bl8danjil NATO has nothing more advanced.

  • @CogitoTesting
    @CogitoTesting 13 дней назад +48

    HIMARS technological superiority? Are you kidding? What have you been smoking?

  • @Chris-ql9bu
    @Chris-ql9bu 13 дней назад +88

    Summer 2022: "Russia is running out of missilies"

    • @meverynoobposter9423
      @meverynoobposter9423 13 дней назад +7

      😂😂😂😂 they have confidence in claiming this but now it's the other way around 😂

    • @basook6116
      @basook6116 13 дней назад +3

      USA PR

    • @grujicdanijel7963
      @grujicdanijel7963 12 дней назад +4

      It's impressive what can be done with shovels and refrigerator chips..

    • @MrPodinarac
      @MrPodinarac 12 дней назад

      😂😂😂

    • @Riga_Style
      @Riga_Style 9 дней назад

      И люди, на помощь идут северо корейцы 😂😂😂👍

  • @Bluemoon-m1n
    @Bluemoon-m1n 13 дней назад +70

    The British press are very silent these days. Why😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @blakgingerginger8573
      @blakgingerginger8573 13 дней назад +4

      😂😂😂😂

    • @MaxMaidiac-h5y
      @MaxMaidiac-h5y 13 дней назад

      The British press is busy attacking the True Patriots of Britain and demanding that political dissenters be thrown in prison for posting online anti Pakistani rape gang information.

    • @douglasnewman4163
      @douglasnewman4163 13 дней назад +6

      They are in "silent mode" while their engineers attempt to copy the Russian "shovels". Ha ha ha!!

    • @edwinchaffin3154
      @edwinchaffin3154 12 дней назад

      storm shadow still being used against russian targets only time till the uk are punished

    • @cheokleongchuan
      @cheokleongchuan 8 дней назад

      British....is a decandant nation. For more than 400 years, they survive on plundering, looting resources of the 3 world countries.

  • @whitefalcon630
    @whitefalcon630 13 дней назад +26

    Russian has the technological edgev in rocket artillery.
    Tornado S (Fires further and more than 2 HIMARS at once from an elevated position having their missiles pushed by the wind (100km range)
    Tonado S 160km range.
    ATACMS 400km range
    ISKANDER 1000KM range and it can be nuclear tipped.

  • @bravolima7394
    @bravolima7394 13 дней назад +39

    NOBODY....will ever force Russia to do anything...EVER again

    • @douglasnewman4163
      @douglasnewman4163 13 дней назад

      Nor should they! The Russian Federation has a right to defend its national sovereignty from the criminal Western Corporate Globalists who are INTENT on world domination, one sovereign nation at a time. THESE are the REAL "human" MONSTERS in The People’s rightful and God-given world! RESIST them everywhere!
      In solidarity and common purpose, We, The People, UNITE EVERYWHERE for OUR God-given Freedom, Liberty, and Justice in OUR world!

  • @-pompomforlife
    @-pompomforlife 13 дней назад +8

    If Zelensky's victory depends on NATO's support, how can that be seen as Ukraine's victory? The only reason NATO is avoiding direct war with Russia is that such direct involvement will definitely lead to nuclear weapon exchange. On the other hand, if NATO were to end it's support for Ukraine, the war would end quickly in Ukraine's defeat. The most troubling aspect of this conflict is that neither the United States nor any of the NATO members has been honest enough to tell the rest of the world why they have tirelessly sought to encircle Russia in order to have an advantage that would enable them to destroy the country. What are the bad things that Russia has done in the world that the United States, Germany, Britain, France, Turkey, etc, have not done?

    • @ltGargoyle
      @ltGargoyle 7 дней назад

      they have not bowed and kissed the ring of the west. they have pride and a willingness to say no. plus America needs a bad guy that allows the military industrial complex a reason to exist.

  • @ivanivan1983
    @ivanivan1983 13 дней назад +52

    Not just himars, patriots were destroyed easily with iskanders systems any day,any time

    • @gajahmada9539
      @gajahmada9539 10 дней назад +1

      Also Russia have better delivery system of nuclear bombs than us

  • @CliftonSimon4924
    @CliftonSimon4924 13 дней назад +6

    I remember earlier in the conflict. Ukraine had a promo boosting the HIMARS that the Russians couldn't touch em. Something like the MIGHTY HIMARS was impossible to defeat.

  • @oldhag2881
    @oldhag2881 13 дней назад +22

    HIMARS is expensive and difficult to replace. USA/NATO can't have too many left.

    • @JPen-pj6ck
      @JPen-pj6ck 13 дней назад +1

      But made politicians filthy rich

  • @alberthenriette8976
    @alberthenriette8976 13 дней назад +12

    Its a cat and mouse battle. So far the Iskander is far ahead on the scoreboard 😅

  • @MrRyder3737
    @MrRyder3737 13 дней назад +47

    Russia has the rights to defend itself

    • @pirat99
      @pirat99 13 дней назад +1

      From whom is Russia defending itself? By whom and when was Russia attacked?

    • @vorkog7259
      @vorkog7259 13 дней назад +9

      ​@@pirat99 the so-called defensive alliance, if you still don't understand the essence of this conflict and its prerequisites

    • @douglasnewman4163
      @douglasnewman4163 13 дней назад +1

      Slava Rusia! 🇨🇦🇷🇺

    • @dosmundos3830
      @dosmundos3830 13 дней назад +3

      @@pirat99 Russia is defending itself from Ukraine. Ukraine attacked the territories that subsequently left Ukraine and joined Russia. The battlefield is now on Russian territory. Ukraine needs to get out of Russia and until they do the war will persist.

    • @pirat99
      @pirat99 12 дней назад +1

      @dosmundos3830 In 2014 it was Russia that illegally occupied Ukrainian territories and organized so-called referenda there, which were as "fair" as any other elections in Russia. It was Russia that started a full-scale war in 2022. Ukraine has never been the first to attack Russia. The only aggressor in this conflict is Russia.

  • @rogeroeyen
    @rogeroeyen 13 дней назад +26

    Funny that they call the Himars a game changer, while nothing has changed for the better for the Ukrainians.
    Even funnier that they claim western technological to be superior, while all their wonder weapons failed to perform remotely as advertised.
    Although these weapons can surely cause significant damage in the fight against countries with a third rate military, they failed miserably in the fight against Russia.
    This whole conflict has been an utter humiliation of western technology.
    None of all the wonder weapons supplied to Ukraine has been able to turn the conflict to Ukraine's advantage.
    They are initially effective, but after a few weeks the Russians find a solution to render them ineffective.
    What Ukrainian resilience are we talking about?
    Ukraine is losing on all fronts and if anything, the Russian progress is picking up speed every single day.
    This war is already lost and the west knows it.
    They are now all looking for ways to blame each other for the loss.
    Ukraine is blaming the west for not supplying them with what they need to win the conflict, while NATO's military stocks are on depletion levels due to their massive donations to Ukraine.
    The western leaders are blaming Ukraine for not deploying their women and kids to the battle field, as if that would have made a difference.
    Fact is that the west never fought a war against a near peer adversary and grossly underestimated Russia.
    Ukraine is paying a terrible price for their arrogance and belligerence.

  • @roki5941
    @roki5941 13 дней назад +46

    I don´t get it,, why pick a fight if you have to depend on others to help out ?
    Seems insane to me. I am sure that the Bandera people regret their move in 2014.
    The only one who is happy is the weapons manufacturers.

    • @bl8danjil
      @bl8danjil 13 дней назад +4

      Russia is the one that picked a fight and invaded.

    • @μολὼνλαβέ-ψ5ξ
      @μολὼνλαβέ-ψ5ξ 13 дней назад +1

      @@bl8danjil … they warned the NATO chihuahuas and their Ukro proxy for years. But they wouldn’t listen but kept on provoking the fight.

    • @roki5941
      @roki5941 13 дней назад

      @@bl8danjil
      Why do you go for the propaganda mantra ?
      We all know that the war started 2014, with Kiev terrorising it´s own people in the east.
      (suprisingly you don´t write full scale invasion 😊)

    • @patrickganly5206
      @patrickganly5206 13 дней назад

      No Hillary! The war started in 2014 and the Ukrainian Russia haters started it.
      Now they've lost because haters always lose, and that applies to NATO also, which is also run by a just bunch of coke snorting losers anyway

    • @_ZVZ_
      @_ZVZ_ 13 дней назад

      Zelensky fool, that’s why the war started, for 80 years the world has been waiting for the next Hitler, he waite

  • @matsforsberg6287
    @matsforsberg6287 13 дней назад +15

    Russian tech are decades ahead of G7

  • @finscreenname
    @finscreenname 13 дней назад +13

    HIMARS has not been a "game changer", it's been nothing.

  • @roki5941
    @roki5941 13 дней назад +11

    All this reminds me about big corporate meetings where some
    power-point heroes are presenting something the dont know anything about.
    In my life the reality is always winning over a nice looking "power point product"

  • @PartTimePirate
    @PartTimePirate 13 дней назад +20

    Selenskij still talking about a ukrainian "Victory" shows us ... we are in the last stages of this war and i also now know what the situation was in hitlers bunker in the last month of ww2 ... he also was completely delusional...

  • @sergioluizbrito9980
    @sergioluizbrito9980 13 дней назад +22

    HURRA!❤ SALVE GRANDE RÚSSIA.

  • @yankeespanker1
    @yankeespanker1 13 дней назад +2

    Russia can counter Himars all day long, proven. The west grossly under estimated Russias capability

  • @GasparGaspar-w7g
    @GasparGaspar-w7g 13 дней назад +7

    Himars changing the game, when?

  • @nelsoncruz7278
    @nelsoncruz7278 12 дней назад +2

    I don't understand how Ukraine will force Russia to the peace table 🤔

  • @WeRSinwar
    @WeRSinwar 12 дней назад +3

    Comedian new year resolution by far was a jokes of the year😂😂

  • @slotaslota8417
    @slotaslota8417 12 дней назад +3

    Naprosto zbytečná válka kvůli několika nenažraným lumpům ☹️🇨🇿🇸🇰

  • @axiondarion4899
    @axiondarion4899 13 дней назад +2

    You forgot to say that Ukraine also attacks civilians with Himars, in Russia but also Donetsk.

  • @MDYUNUSMANDAL
    @MDYUNUSMANDAL 13 дней назад +4

    Excellent News Bro

  • @Meanscreen82
    @Meanscreen82 12 дней назад +3

    Looks like himars went straight to Mars

  • @johannesfeigl5309
    @johannesfeigl5309 12 дней назад +2

    Great news slava rossjahurraaaaaah😊

  • @hubertcrevels9843
    @hubertcrevels9843 12 дней назад +1

    BS. Ukraine’s would never move the HIMARS in a convoy or place them close together. The pictures of the HIMARS in action are, at least, one year old.

  • @scruffscruffeton986
    @scruffscruffeton986 12 дней назад +1

    Think Zelenski's hope for 2025 is he's able to get out of Kiev before his dictatorship completely falls apart.

  • @luvanime1986
    @luvanime1986 12 дней назад +3

    Himars are game changers? Technological advancements? Frustrating Russian advances? Who paid you guys to come up with this stuff??? The Russian military was able to use electronic warfare against u.s. deployed himaes rockets (they are fired by u.s. military commands and satellite data, ukrainian soldiers only push the launch button) within 6 months of their deployment. Russian EW specialists have only gotten even better at taking control of or confusing flight path commands on the himars. Of course there will be times when a missile or two get through one's safeguards and hit a bridge or weaopons depot, but it's only because of the law of averages, not because himars were some game changers. Same can be said for ATACMS, Storm Shadows, and the other nato weapons. Yet ukraine has yet to be able to ew take over any Russian missile (drones yes, but that's low tech) Russia utilizes.

  • @-pompomforlife
    @-pompomforlife 13 дней назад +3

    By the way, wouldn't the world be a better place, if people would put in enough effort to try and get along with their neighbors, instead of plotting with others to hurt their neighbors?

    • @ltGargoyle
      @ltGargoyle 7 дней назад

      in an evolved world yes. unfortunatly, we are humans. and if you looked at the world like the hunger games there are regions which are districts. and the USA is the capital. you do as the capital says or your district will be punished.

  • @SilvanoBertora
    @SilvanoBertora 13 дней назад +11

    Non volete ammettere che la Russia ha già vinto per la sua superiorità tattico-strategica sul campo di battaglia e per la sua superiorità tecnologica. Poveri illusi americani ed anglosassoni: il periodo dell'imperialismo è arrivato al capolinea. 50 stati occidentali contro uno:; risultato sconfitta clamorosa.

  • @cokrlicix
    @cokrlicix 12 дней назад +1

    Although Himars is a very capable weapons system that has caused many problems for the Russian army, it is not a game changer or proof of technological superiority. Tornado S
    is in the same class of weapons but superior in every way. And you showed just part of the Iskander strike on 6 Himars vehicles; there were 3 Iskander launched: the first one missed,
    the second one with cluster warhead was the one that made the most of the damage, and the third one ensured that the first two vehicles were gone. This is just one of several instances
    of multiple Himars being lost since the Kursk invasion happened, and Russian media doesn't proclaim victory after each such event.

  • @NgonidzasheNgwaru
    @NgonidzasheNgwaru 13 дней назад +6

    Famba Putin 🇷🇺🇷🇺💯rowa masasikamu aite order shit!!!

  • @juryi1
    @juryi1 13 дней назад +15

    СУПЕР РОССИЯ ПАБЕДА
    SUPER ROSSIYA PABEDA

  • @mpravica
    @mpravica 13 дней назад +4

    Putin has never said that he would not negotiate. But at this point with the west and ukraine totally collapsing, Russia has the upper hand.

  • @BrianRimmer-kt5md
    @BrianRimmer-kt5md 13 дней назад +3

    Mighty Russia

  • @mahirshahriarhussain5756
    @mahirshahriarhussain5756 13 дней назад +9

    Russia will sell plenty of Iskanders after this war ends

  • @trumanhw
    @trumanhw 13 дней назад +1

    Russia needs some form of better terminal guidance for DIRECT hits:
    "IDEAL" would've meant hitting the MISSLE of this HIMARS convoy.
    Larger Russian weapons RARELY get direct hits, instead getting 'near.'
    Whether they need a smaller CEP, imaging seekers, or slower missiles,
    They gotta do [something]. Iskanders are a pricey way to miss targets.

  • @viorelpiscanu9425
    @viorelpiscanu9425 12 дней назад +1

    What " Victory" means for Ukraine!? So many different ways of statements... Confuse the public...

  • @kamelkamel-d3d
    @kamelkamel-d3d 10 дней назад +3

    منضومة هيمارس اصبحت مجرد لعبة اطفال 😅

  • @andrewsansom4798
    @andrewsansom4798 13 дней назад +1

    What you need to understand is western equipment is marketed by the "Military industrial complex" they have whole teams making videos about how good their stuff is, but just like buying a second hand car you can not always believe what they say. and the other point is all their "tests" take place under perfect conditions, on the battle field when people are shooting back things are a little different.

  • @clarenceedwards2866
    @clarenceedwards2866 12 дней назад +1

    Stop using the name Ukraine when in fact Russia is fighting NATO and have been fighting them now for more than a year.

  • @hugosz1973
    @hugosz1973 13 дней назад +7

    Uuuurrrraaaaaa

  • @DrLookSkywalker
    @DrLookSkywalker 13 дней назад +17

    This happened days ago.

  • @nafiznastaim7491
    @nafiznastaim7491 12 дней назад +1

    Please wake up... You are facing Russia Forces... Not iraq or libya.

  • @jurekczarnowski5668
    @jurekczarnowski5668 13 дней назад +14

    We love Mr Putin

  • @orkidea80
    @orkidea80 13 дней назад +2

    this feels like some russian propaganda channel every vid is about russian victories

    • @vorkog7259
      @vorkog7259 13 дней назад +1

      because Ukraine is finished

    • @dosmundos3830
      @dosmundos3830 13 дней назад

      you mean the truth? 1st time experiencing it? lol

  • @Shinyboy29
    @Shinyboy29 13 дней назад +3

    5 birds with 3 stones

  • @davemccrillis1470
    @davemccrillis1470 13 дней назад +1

    $1.3 billion dollars each

  • @N4CR
    @N4CR 12 дней назад +1

    RU doesn't have budget to compete everywhere but SAM and missile tech they lead in.

  • @anthonyquainoo6505
    @anthonyquainoo6505 13 дней назад +4

    "Domestically produced" hih ?!??

  • @noexit7089
    @noexit7089 13 дней назад +8

    Make a milion Iskanders Russia

    • @bl8danjil
      @bl8danjil 13 дней назад

      Nyet, they get North Korean rockets.

  • @quazars236
    @quazars236 13 дней назад +1

    Beware of FALSE HOPE...😂🎉

  • @ИванИванов-ш4ч6з
    @ИванИванов-ш4ч6з 13 дней назад +10

    Слава Новароссии

  • @SergeyBaybr
    @SergeyBaybr 9 дней назад

    Все нато с ее шестерками проигрывает одной России.

  • @thomaswalker5277
    @thomaswalker5277 13 дней назад +1

    "HIMARS a game changer"...?.. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH
    Right, thats why Ukraine is getting their asses handed to them.

  • @matsforsberg6287
    @matsforsberg6287 13 дней назад +1

    New Years fireworks. In Ukraine and Karma L.A.

  • @viorelpiscanu9425
    @viorelpiscanu9425 12 дней назад

    What " JUST PEACE WITH RUSSIA" means anyway!?

  • @user-hi1gg1kt2e
    @user-hi1gg1kt2e 12 дней назад

    Never been game 🎮 changer at all,😅

  • @aakashboom
    @aakashboom 13 дней назад +7

    iskander should be more costly i think

  • @davemccrillis1470
    @davemccrillis1470 13 дней назад

    They use himars launchers for ATACMS also which makes this a twofer. It’s likely that they were operated by Americans.

  • @ivotomicic4471
    @ivotomicic4471 11 дней назад

    korrekt.....

  • @skydeclair
    @skydeclair 12 дней назад

    Relie on a broken horse,

  • @GregoryBamber
    @GregoryBamber 13 дней назад

    URA ROSSIYA !!!!!

  • @FatherFractal
    @FatherFractal 13 дней назад

    Don't bite off what you can't chew !

  • @jessec4677
    @jessec4677 13 дней назад

    Ah, Zelensky... What you SHOULD'VE asked for.... Was not HIMARS, but obviously shovels and washing machines. 🤣

  • @ReineDedeurwaerder-Sulmo-rz9cz
    @ReineDedeurwaerder-Sulmo-rz9cz 2 дня назад

    2nd Patriotic War❤🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💖🦢💖🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🏗️🇷🇺🇷🇺🕍🇷🇺⛪🇷🇺🐦💒🦢🐨🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🐨💖

  • @matsforsberg6287
    @matsforsberg6287 13 дней назад

    looks like they missed all 4 military vehicles

  • @jesserey-f8t
    @jesserey-f8t 13 дней назад +3

  • @p-nutgallery2511
    @p-nutgallery2511 13 дней назад

    40 seconds of adieu

  • @ronniaj
    @ronniaj 13 дней назад +1

    Zelensky says that Russia only used 24 iskander last year. In fact the used about a Thousand. Bad propaganda

  • @duman5596
    @duman5596 13 дней назад +1

    _Now the west know that they ain't sh*t._ 😂

  • @marxman00
    @marxman00 13 дней назад +1

    When are the metal melting weapons used in Maui and california going to get used ?

  • @rodneystevens8325
    @rodneystevens8325 13 дней назад

    HIMARS and Patriot systems are so effective Ukrainian advances on the battlefield are being recorded daily. Zelensky marches on Moscow next week.

  • @filippozoncada3660
    @filippozoncada3660 8 дней назад

    Himars losses is a big loss
    It is not a bmp 1 it’s maybe their best weapon

  • @tomislavvaldec1
    @tomislavvaldec1 13 дней назад +2

    so old news

  • @KG98760
    @KG98760 13 дней назад +2

    Long live Russia wish you well Russia from Britain.

  • @ansi17
    @ansi17 День назад

    Bro said " The incident" took place... its WAR what incident 😂

  • @CHRISTOPHEROSSAI-j3m
    @CHRISTOPHEROSSAI-j3m 13 дней назад

    your talking rubish, himmers never lived up the hype , as the claimed,and never gat to its destinations!!

  • @KupiProdaj-b9b
    @KupiProdaj-b9b 13 дней назад +1

    Only significant damage was done by cluster-one, first missile missed like 400m, second missed by 50 at least

  • @jerryross9638
    @jerryross9638 8 дней назад

    physics makes it virtually impossible to intercept an incoming Iskander missile with the current level of Western anti-missile defense capabilities. with a non-ballistic arc and a terminal speed of over Mach 7 to Mach 10 the response time is not quick enough nor are the missiles capable of intercepting something that is traveling at such high speeds as Mach 6 on an unpredictable path. We all see who has the superior weapons in this conflict and it certainly isn't the side of the USA. Their weapons have proved a dismal failure, not even living up to their own limited capabilities as claimed by the money go round weapons manufacturers "superior technology". The only thing superior to the Russians is the incredible price tag for so many duds, underperforming systems and inability to rapidly manufacture any of these things.

  • @TheTruth-vi1nf
    @TheTruth-vi1nf 13 дней назад

    This happened some time ago.

  • @denxero
    @denxero 13 дней назад

    'symbolic display of dominance' .. oh the sad cope.

  • @evanelledev7237
    @evanelledev7237 13 дней назад

    So many demented and gullible keyboard warriors in these comments.

  • @thehonorablejiveturkeyspoo6370
    @thehonorablejiveturkeyspoo6370 13 дней назад

    What do you mean "Without any further ado"

  • @francescobettin9566
    @francescobettin9566 13 дней назад +2

  • @macanalista
    @macanalista 13 дней назад

    Old footage?

  • @BradStyles-h7x
    @BradStyles-h7x 7 дней назад

    Really 😂 iskander can't prove it's success without having confirmation! And this video doesn't show you any confirmation of the systems being hit, and as usual, Russia doesn't give us any good or useful information, but Ukraine has done just that!! State television claiming victory without certainty 😂isn't that what got them in this mess when it began 😂

  • @gopherhockeygeek
    @gopherhockeygeek 13 дней назад

    I see the Russian propaganda machine is alive and well.

  • @phatster88
    @phatster88 8 дней назад

    Money well spent.

  • @lopcliz8190
    @lopcliz8190 13 дней назад

    NATO 🤜🤜👎

  • @blenozaro8980
    @blenozaro8980 13 дней назад

    Dream on producer

  • @gillesgangneux2880
    @gillesgangneux2880 13 дней назад

    Voir Engels, Kazan, etc....

    • @vorkog7259
      @vorkog7259 13 дней назад

      and then look at the state of Ukraine's energy sector🤣