Enjoyed the review and it appeared you really liked the car. However, I would have liked it more if you had talked about the driving experience. Mention such topics as acceleration, comfort, and handling to name a few. That being said I did subscribe.
My dad almost bought one of these but ended up going with an Accord EX-L 1.5T. Much better choice in my opinion. The legacy is a great car, but the Accord is just worlds ahead in my opinion
@@99charged The Accord I'm pretty sure comes standard with blind-spot monitoring. If it doesn't I think the Sport trim and higher come with it. No 11" display, but in all honesty, there is no reason for that big of a display in a car. Especially with all the climate controls built into it and the amount of lag Subaru has in its displays is pointless. Our accord came with an 8" touch screen, which is plenty. Climate controls are separate physical controls. We paid $30,000 for it even though the MSRP is $31,200. Honda threw in a ton of extras for us as well bringing the MSRP up to around $34,000.
@@namesdom I looked at both and easily chose the Subaru. Accord is nice but worlds behind in technology and not to mention more expensive and still no AWD. Subaru is a much better deal specially if you live in snowy areas. Maybe there’s “no need” for the big screen but the reality is that there’s no need to spend more to get less in my opinion. For 30k I would’ve put my money on the Kia K5 👍🏽
@@S.0.G totally agree with you in terms of AWD. Yes the accord costs more, but also provides a more potent engine (although there may be issues with the CVT and other issues due to small displacement). Personally, I much much prefer the accord for where I live and I’d much rather have a car without a large screen. Hell, I’d even go as far as to say I’d rather have no screen in my car. The Subaru is by no means a bad choice! Just not practice for my family. Another reason we didn’t get the Legacy is because my mom has a 2013 Crosstrek which has been nothing but problems. I drive a 2008 Honda CR-V with very little issues so far. The crosstrek has had both front axles replaced, soon needs a new transmission, suspension is acting up, never have had a good alignment even with a camber kit and multiple alignments, head head gasket has failed and been replaced and Subaru has extended the warranty for the 3rd time for the drive train. Not to mention it rides terrible and is a complete shit show to drive…
Enjoyed the review and it appeared you really liked the car. However, I would have liked it more if you had talked about the driving experience. Mention such topics as acceleration, comfort, and handling to name a few. That being said I did subscribe.
Kinda like that color
It’s rlly nice
The premium doesn’t have push to start. They really cheap’d out on this one.
It does, but have to pay extra for the package that includes it!
My dad almost bought one of these but ended up going with an Accord EX-L 1.5T. Much better choice in my opinion. The legacy is a great car, but the Accord is just worlds ahead in my opinion
Does the Honda have the blind spot thing and an 11 inch display? and what did your dad pay for it just curious
@@99charged The Accord I'm pretty sure comes standard with blind-spot monitoring. If it doesn't I think the Sport trim and higher come with it. No 11" display, but in all honesty, there is no reason for that big of a display in a car. Especially with all the climate controls built into it and the amount of lag Subaru has in its displays is pointless. Our accord came with an 8" touch screen, which is plenty. Climate controls are separate physical controls. We paid $30,000 for it even though the MSRP is $31,200. Honda threw in a ton of extras for us as well bringing the MSRP up to around $34,000.
@@namesdom
I looked at both and easily chose the Subaru. Accord is nice but worlds behind in technology and not to mention more expensive and still no AWD. Subaru is a much better deal specially if you live in snowy areas. Maybe there’s “no need” for the big screen but the reality is that there’s no need to spend more to get less in my opinion. For 30k I would’ve put my money on the Kia K5 👍🏽
@@S.0.G totally agree with you in terms of AWD. Yes the accord costs more, but also provides a more potent engine (although there may be issues with the CVT and other issues due to small displacement). Personally, I much much prefer the accord for where I live and I’d much rather have a car without a large screen. Hell, I’d even go as far as to say I’d rather have no screen in my car. The Subaru is by no means a bad choice! Just not practice for my family. Another reason we didn’t get the Legacy is because my mom has a 2013 Crosstrek which has been nothing but problems. I drive a 2008 Honda CR-V with very little issues so far. The crosstrek has had both front axles replaced, soon needs a new transmission, suspension is acting up, never have had a good alignment even with a camber kit and multiple alignments, head head gasket has failed and been replaced and Subaru has extended the warranty for the 3rd time for the drive train. Not to mention it rides terrible and is a complete shit show to drive…
The accord doesn’t have AWD lmao
Does it have the same engine as the Subaru Outback and does it drive similiar to the OB and does it have AWD
This vehicle has the same 4 cylinder as the Subaru Outback. Which is great for finding parts if needed
Every Subaru every has AWD
There was no need to take us around the building twice. You could have used that time to tell us more about the interior features, etc. Thanks.
This was just you driving around in a car .... in very small circles.