true! but recognise that the VSTI emulations of analog synths are better and better.I also have several real analog synths,particully from Moog,and about the sound , I agree whith you.
I think modern analog emulations have bridged the gap sonically. The advantage of hardware today lies in other aspects like tangible control surfaces and spontaneous workflow.
This has been my favorite synthesizer run through video because you show each one doing a normal thing and then you show each one doing a weird thing and none of it is about showing off expensive gear, instead it's about showing off what the instrument can do. bravo!
Most of these instruments were works of art to say the least.Great wild sounds that personified the 70's and 80's.You really had to know how to program these instruments just right.
I love that everytime I see a video like this there are always dozens of people hating on someone because they didn't go out and buy £100,000 worth of kit just for a 10 minute youtube video.
Come on peasant. You actually think that a plugin sounds REMOTELY close to the original? The answer is no - it doesn't - it PALES in comparison to the original. Take the Moog System 55 : ruclips.net/video/n3K_fZDvINs/видео.html
@@dingo7055 Actually you can get incredibly close. And conversely, the hardware can't get exactly the same sound as a plugin. Every hardware has its own sound, just as does every VST. Someone could just as easily say "The 'Original' PALES in comparison to the VST version. You couldn't build a hardware version of a VST that sounds nearly the same. Only purists are really concerned with this stuff. Other people just sell records.
@King Chromosome And that's the kind of comment a fool that paid 100,000 on gear only to find out you can get the same sounds from a laptop for a fraction of the price would say. Bless your cotton socks!
@@dingo7055 A moog Yeah. Some plugins are crap but there are high end emulation plugins that you could not even tell the difference and they are getting better all the time. There is even a Matrix 12 plugin that is just breath taking.I have lots of gear and plugins so i am not just talking. I still prefer to have gear but it's only a matter of time.
@@dingo7055 I mean...I don't really hear anything special there. Just the usual saw wave and other common forms. At best the plugins have a hard time nailing the filter. Other than that no there isn't a gigantic difference. Purists just trying hard to look purist.
I have the new re-issue Mini Moog. My dad had one when I was a kid and it used to amaze me with the sounds it made. I like the current trend for analogue synths.
probably the best sounding period for a analogue synths: played almost all of those shown here and still owning quite a few (MS 20, 800DV, SH2, Odyssey, MoogD, Prophet5)... sadly, had to sell AKS, EML101 and System100 (not listed here)
You could have featured the Yamaha CS30, it's a bit an oddball in most synthesiser users book but is truly amazing in the range of sounds it can produce. It always gets overlooked because of its semi-modular layout and patch setting through switch positions. I think pretty much every sound you demo here i have had my CS30 create. (is there a CS30 plug in?) for those of you who know synths, here is a quick rundown of its features, 3 envelope generators (one of which is not a traditional ADSR having attack level and initial level settings instead of a sustain level, it is invertable too.) the other two are ADSR type, one of which is invertable giving 5 eg's to choose from. they can modulate pitch, frequency cut off and of course amplitude, also will modulate the LFO rate. There are two oscillators both have square and sawtooth plus a sine wave, from oscillator one.Both square waves have PW and PW modulation driven by a sine wave from the LFO. You can modulate oscillator one with oscillator two. it has two filters modulated by the LFO square sawtooth sine, external or Sample and hold and modulated by the EG's You can patch the filters to create a variable width notch filter, the filters can be high pass, low pass and band pass filters. The ouput signal from the LFO is only chosen at its destination, so each block can have a different modulation shape. i could go on but i would fill this page with its features. Oh yeah then there is the eight not sequencer also with interesting features......
Awesome! I can't believe you included an ElectroComp here, as I have never seen anyone refer to that before. I took a college music course in Synthesizer and Tape Composition back in 1974. We used a Moog and an ElectroComp. While I much preferred the Moog, the ElectroComp was easy and fun to use. I bought a Moog Subsequent 37 a couple of years ago. I miss the old telephone switchboard like patchcords, but it's easier to use and understand with just knows. I have an EHX Synth9 guitar pedal I can throw my guitar or Casio keyboard through to dial in fairly decent sounds from other synths, as well as a couple of software synthesizers I can control with the Casio using Midi. Throw in the Moog and I have a seemingly limitless pallette of sounds to work with. I could never afford a synthesizer when I first heard "Switched On Bach" as a teen in the 2960s, and that persisted until very recently. But, gven how relatively cheap most synthesizers are today, we are truly living in an age of unprecedented sound synthesis capability.
I love the Odyssey (may get the Korg remake someday), but only the 2600 could make the noises heard at the beginning of the Chicago song, "Italian from New York." That's Chicago's Robert Lamm reaching into the labyrinthine world of avant garde electronic music.
+ShreadTheWeapon Thanks for turning me on to that. I saw a pic of Bobby Lamm with the 2600 and I wondered where he really used it - that answers my question!
Bill Vincent I'm very glad to have steered you to that song. While I totally dig the way David J. "Hawk" Wolinski used it during those same sessions, I equally dig the way Lamm tapped into the random nature of this baby. And, I wonder if it can be re-created with any of the 2600 emulation software.
Yeah i love these old rough original sounds, then twig them to your own specs.I have Korg wave station sound module,Korg Qw-1 sound module and Prophecy Synth,Roland JV2080.I love them all.
@@MisAnnThorpe Owning a CS-10 myself, I think that in this video between 9:33 - 9:35 someone put his own voice through the filter of the CS-10. Lot's of synthesizers are capable of this, as long as they have an "external in" option.
I had the Yamaha CS 5. I played in a duo. Had a Rhodes stage and the Yamaha on top for L hand bass. Talk about kicking. The footages went 2 - 4 -8 - 16- 32- and 64. There was a pitch slider on the left cheek block that raised or lowered the pitch up to one octave.. If the synth was at the 64' setting, I could play the bottom "C" and move the pitch slider all the way down ( lowered another octave giving a 128' footage stop) and you could hear the oscillation.
Pascal Fouquereau Ehhh ..... the MS-20 is from Korg .. I own one,, also a Voyager select series, and I made my living with two model D's from 1978 - 1988. There is no sense in arguing which one sounds better anymore than arguing which Italian sports car is more bitchin lol. My point was the Voyager is called a Minimoog .. I'm looking at my black and gold owners manual and it says 'Minimoog Voyager' So technically this video is not incorrect.
The title of this video is "vintage synthesizer 1970-1979". Unless someone went to the future in a time machine in 1970-1979, there was no Minimoog Voyager back then.
I've owned/own few minimoog's, I have to agree, the video is supposed to be 70-79 so the voyager is the wrong minimoog to represent, Im getting into any of the "this one is better, NO! THIS one IS better!!" nonsense, they are both moogs, both sound great and have many uses. Im only statimg that it isnt the correct moog for this period of demo.
I had this playing in the background while reading something else. The sounds emanating from the speakers were as normal as me breathing. I think I'm in too deep.
I'm CURIOUS: I've NEVER had enough money to buy ANY Synthesizer, BUT, I have a Kindle Fire Tablet. On the APP STORE, there is an APK called CAUSTIC 3.2. I IMMEDIATELY GOT IT. IT HAS 9 synths, a tonewheel (Hammond like!), a vocoder, 12 fx pedals that you can use (2 per Instrument), a mixer, ad a master board. The synthesizers include a modular (moog-type) that you can use up to 16 modules on( I made one that HAD 8 waveform generators (oscillators)). Once you've got a setup that you like, you save it, then when you want to use it go to the saved list and tap 'load' and it's there! The modular also has an arpeggiator, and an oscilloscope so you can SEE the waveform that you've created. The other synths are each different from each other: A pad synth, a synth that specializes in string and oriental type sounds, a Bass Synth, a sub synth, an 8 bit synth for those who want to go back to the Radio Shack Synth days. The modular synth also has a Machine Input module that sends sounds from ANY of the synths(up to 3 per M.I!) to the modular synth, which you can use the arpeggiator and/or oscilloscope on. IF YOU DON'T HAVE CAUSTIC 3.2, GET IT!!! "WHY?" ( This will cinch the deal!!!) IT IS FREE, FREE, FREE!!!!!!! p.s. Caustic can be connected, by MIDI, to a keyboard! 1 person from an ELP tribute band put me down for even posting this on FB! He laughed at me and asked if C3.2 would LOOK as impressive, on stage, as his MOOG Model 55. If I could talk to him in person, I'd say "Change your synth to sound like THIS, and back again." In LESS THAN 5 SECONDS I WOULD BE DONE!!! Then I would say "SO LONG, DUMB-$#!T" and walk away! IF ANYONE OUT THERE HAS CAUSTIC 3.2 TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK OF IT!!!???? THANX!
I forgot to mention that it also has a sequencer, a beat box, and each keyboard can be programmed to play notes. I, at one time, had several keyboards playing the ending of KARN EVIL 9 3RD IMPRESSION, starting out slow, and increasing the speed until it was just a 'sonic blur'.
I had an RML; bought it new. However, I lost it while in college in Maine, and have no idea where it is now. I still have the manual and original Bill of Payment. Stolen? Did I just leave it in a dorm?
Plugins don’t do a bad job at mimicking the sound of an analog synth but analog synths have a charm and a sound that will never be matched.
true! but recognise that the VSTI emulations of analog synths are better and better.I also have several real analog synths,particully from Moog,and about the sound , I agree whith you.
Have you checked out Moog model 15 app? Pretty serious emulation of the original. (Not that I’ve compared it directly, but still....it’s good)
And 99% of people buying and listening to music don't hear that or even care about it.
When I am listening to my analog gear ROAR I don't care about people who can only buy and listen to music. xD
I think modern analog emulations have bridged the gap sonically. The advantage of hardware today lies in other aspects like tangible control surfaces and spontaneous workflow.
This has been my favorite synthesizer run through video because you show each one doing a normal thing and then you show each one doing a weird thing and none of it is about showing off expensive gear, instead it's about showing off what the instrument can do. bravo!
Most of these instruments were works of art to say the least.Great wild sounds that personified the 70's and 80's.You really had to know how to program these instruments just right.
Oh, _man_ -- that modular Moog puts out the most _amazing_ textures!
You're synths seris of videos are excellent. You cover the best synths from 1970-96, without being biased. Great stuff! :-)
I love that everytime I see a video like this there are always dozens of people hating on someone because they didn't go out and buy £100,000 worth of kit just for a 10 minute youtube video.
Come on peasant. You actually think that a plugin sounds REMOTELY close to the original? The answer is no - it doesn't - it PALES in comparison to the original. Take the Moog System 55 : ruclips.net/video/n3K_fZDvINs/видео.html
@@dingo7055 Actually you can get incredibly close. And conversely, the hardware can't get exactly the same sound as a plugin. Every hardware has its own sound, just as does every VST. Someone could just as easily say "The 'Original' PALES in comparison to the VST version. You couldn't build a hardware version of a VST that sounds nearly the same. Only purists are really concerned with this stuff. Other people just sell records.
@King Chromosome And that's the kind of comment a fool that paid 100,000 on gear only to find out you can get the same sounds from a laptop for a fraction of the price would say. Bless your cotton socks!
@@dingo7055 A moog Yeah. Some plugins are crap but there are high end emulation plugins that you could not even tell the difference and they are getting better all the time. There is even a Matrix 12 plugin that is just breath taking.I have lots of gear and plugins so i am not just talking. I still prefer to have gear but it's only a matter of time.
@@dingo7055
I mean...I don't really hear anything special there. Just the usual saw wave and other common forms. At best the plugins have a hard time nailing the filter. Other than that no there isn't a gigantic difference. Purists just trying hard to look purist.
I have the new re-issue Mini Moog. My dad had one when I was a kid and it used to amaze me with the sounds it made. I like the current trend for analogue synths.
All of these synths are immortalized in modern day computers as DAW samples. and workstation keyboards samples.
I still remember the Proph 5 in my middle school music class (mid 80's), everyone always fought to be on it.
probably the best sounding period for a analogue synths: played almost all of those shown here and still owning quite a few (MS 20, 800DV, SH2, Odyssey, MoogD, Prophet5)... sadly, had to sell AKS, EML101 and System100 (not listed here)
Ah the system 100 ! you are right,is missing as it is also a great vintage synth of this period.
I cut my teeth on the EML 101. Local university and college had ‘em in their Electronic Music labs. Too bad you had to let yours go.
the sounds at 8:44 reminds me of tv ident music of the 70s, nice. Synth music was everywhere in tv in those days
I love moog system 55. It has very warm sound in my opinion.
You could have featured the Yamaha CS30, it's a bit an oddball in most synthesiser users book but is truly amazing in the range of sounds it can produce. It always gets overlooked because of its semi-modular layout and patch setting through switch positions. I think pretty much every sound you demo here i have had my CS30 create. (is there a CS30 plug in?) for those of you who know synths, here is a quick rundown of its features, 3 envelope generators (one of which is not a traditional ADSR having attack level and initial level settings instead of a sustain level, it is invertable too.) the other two are ADSR type, one of which is invertable giving 5 eg's to choose from. they can modulate pitch, frequency cut off and of course amplitude, also will modulate the LFO rate. There are two oscillators both have square and sawtooth plus a sine wave, from oscillator one.Both square waves have PW and PW modulation driven by a sine wave from the LFO. You can modulate oscillator one with oscillator two. it has two filters modulated by the LFO square sawtooth sine, external or Sample and hold and modulated by the EG's You can patch the filters to create a variable width notch filter, the filters can be high pass, low pass and band pass filters. The ouput signal from the LFO is only chosen at its destination, so each block can have a different modulation shape. i could go on but i would fill this page with its features. Oh yeah then there is the eight not sequencer also with interesting features......
Yamaha CS-10 was my first synth, it's great to see and hear it again!
Awesome! I can't believe you included an ElectroComp here, as I have never seen anyone refer to that before. I took a college music course in Synthesizer and Tape Composition back in 1974. We used a Moog and an ElectroComp. While I much preferred the Moog, the ElectroComp was easy and fun to use.
I bought a Moog Subsequent 37 a couple of years ago. I miss the old telephone switchboard like patchcords, but it's easier to use and understand with just knows.
I have an EHX Synth9 guitar pedal I can throw my guitar or Casio keyboard through to dial in fairly decent sounds from other synths, as well as a couple of software synthesizers I can control with the Casio using Midi. Throw in the Moog and I have a seemingly limitless pallette of sounds to work with.
I could never afford a synthesizer when I first heard "Switched On Bach" as a teen in the 2960s, and that persisted until very recently. But, gven how relatively cheap most synthesizers are today, we are truly living in an age of unprecedented sound synthesis capability.
Autocorrect:
"Knows" => knobs
"2960s" => 1960s
I love how modern they sound. It's just the way of implementing them that changed.
Hey buddy. just got this video recommended in 2020.
I miss my old Arp Odyssey, should have never gotten rid of that!:)
Good selection but there are some important missing synth like ARP 2600, ARP Pro Soloist, RMI Harmonic Synthesizer...
Hi, i have ARP2600 in kontakt and vst version, RMI Harmonic vst, ARP Odessay - contact me , skype: creationszahra
DON'T FORGET PS 3300/200 MODULAIRE KORG
Now I know why the prophet 5 is a monster...
How could you forgot about the legendary roland sh-5 synthesizer? it THE flagship of instruments beside the Minimoog in my opinion...
I love synthesizer that's my favorite instrument
I love the Odyssey (may get the Korg remake someday), but only the 2600 could make the noises heard at the beginning of the Chicago song, "Italian from New York." That's Chicago's Robert Lamm reaching into the labyrinthine world of avant garde electronic music.
+ShreadTheWeapon Thanks for turning me on to that. I saw a pic of Bobby Lamm with the 2600 and I wondered where he really used it - that answers my question!
Bill Vincent
I'm very glad to have steered you to that song. While I totally dig the way David J. "Hawk" Wolinski used it during those same sessions, I equally dig the way Lamm tapped into the random nature of this baby. And, I wonder if it can be re-created with any of the 2600 emulation software.
fantastic instruments...I love synths!
Yeah i love these old rough original sounds, then twig them to your own specs.I have Korg wave station sound module,Korg Qw-1 sound module and Prophecy Synth,Roland JV2080.I love them all.
Nice to see the EML 100! Underrated gem.
Os sintetizadores sao a extensao da nossa criatividade musical abstrata!
Remember that 1970s TV show “In Search Of?“ I can hear some of the music from that show in these synthesizers.
wow, the RML is beautiful. Nice filters.
Normally, all the popup 'ads' really get on my nerves, but that Duracell ad at 1:19 was catchy!
The ElectroComp 100 its savage!
Nice overview!The CS-10 is the only synth I have from these. If I will have the money in the future I will buy certainly the E.M.U. Modular!
My university's electronic music program has one, and it's an absolute joy to use!
Is it easy to get it to "talk" like in this demonstration?
One of the most interesting sounding ones...
@@MisAnnThorpe Owning a CS-10 myself, I think that in this video between 9:33 - 9:35 someone put his own voice through the filter of the CS-10. Lot's of synthesizers are capable of this, as long as they have an "external in" option.
@@pakey423 Thank you for that Peter.
I had the Yamaha CS 5. I played in a duo. Had a Rhodes stage and the Yamaha on top for L hand bass. Talk about kicking. The footages went 2 - 4 -8 - 16- 32- and 64. There was a pitch slider on the left cheek block that raised or lowered the pitch up to one octave.. If the synth was at the 64' setting, I could play the bottom "C" and move the pitch slider all the way down ( lowered another octave giving a 128' footage stop) and you could hear the oscillation.
Haha, I’ve got a CS 10 sitting in a Rhodes 73 myself! Great combination indeed.
Odyssey 🥰
That aint a Minimoog Model D, its a Voyager Old School.
Dean Honer It doesn't say its a Model D, it just says Minimoog, and the Voyager IS a Minimoog, its a Minimoog Voyager old school.
no, Voyager is not Minimoog D! just listen the sound... The Ms20 is more "fat" !!!
Pascal Fouquereau Ehhh ..... the MS-20 is from Korg .. I own one,, also a Voyager select series, and I made my living with two model D's from 1978 - 1988. There is no sense in arguing which one sounds better anymore than arguing which Italian sports car is more bitchin lol. My point was the Voyager is called a Minimoog .. I'm looking at my black and gold owners manual and it says 'Minimoog Voyager' So technically this video is not incorrect.
The title of this video is "vintage synthesizer 1970-1979". Unless someone went to the future in a time machine in 1970-1979, there was no Minimoog Voyager back then.
I've owned/own few minimoog's, I have to agree, the video is supposed to be 70-79 so the voyager is the wrong minimoog to represent, Im getting into any of the "this one is better, NO! THIS one IS better!!" nonsense, they are both moogs, both sound great and have many uses. Im only statimg that it isnt the correct moog for this period of demo.
cs-10 for the win
System 55 got my attention. 1:38
The second Pro.5 patch sounds like a recognizer from Tron.
I'm so glad I'm not the only one who noticed that. :D
2:20 sounds like a song from a movie i've seen....
I had an EML-101. Paid $700 for it in 1980. Boy do I regret selling it!
Had a 800dv,got it for150 us in an estate sale years ago ,god i wish i never would have sold it when the powrr supply smoked,it could've been saved
Great video 🎹
Great Sounds and great synthies .....
Very cool.
I wonder if these are VST simulations? The sounds do not sound quite original through my PC.
4:40 She's Got Claws
You can hear the same sound if you hold on to the free wires in the attic next to the 220-110 V converter
I had this playing in the background while reading something else. The sounds emanating from the speakers were as normal as me breathing.
I think I'm in too deep.
reiss philippe you are awesome mad ass drummer.
Actually in the beginning when he says "minimoog" he doesn't say that it is the minimoog model D so it could still mean that it is Voyager old school
Oh wait... The Voyager didn't come out back then
It's not a minimoog. End of.
Gotta love them KNOBS & SLIDERS!!!
& don't forget the wires & plugins too
The Yamaha CS10 sounds like as if it was talking, a talking keyboard
Future Behringer collection.
5:09 Sequential Prophet 5= *"Atomic Dog" synth guitar* sound (1982 George Clinton) 😎
So that is why the Prophet 5 is legendary - it created the standard layout of synthesizers and electronic keyboards to this day...
wrong minimoog
No Yamaha CS-80 ?
these are vst's. i know these sounds, coz i have them also.
So, where's your "correct" video..? ;)
T-man's keyboards and organs I think he meant that he‘s got the vsts. And yes, these are not the sounds from the originals as you can tell.
And Tony Banks's ARP Pro Soloist, no?
AMAZING
beasts!
At 2:50, that reminds me of something from The THX "Deep Note", right, guys?
no
No Roland Jupiter 4?
It's remarkable how all of those "vintage" synths sound the same...
noob
lol
Please make typo correction, it is EML ElectroComp 100, E not "R"
Fun = Younger i like the Cruman DS2 box = trés lourd à transporter
awesome
Good video.. thanks
Prophet-5 sure was shown the door pretty quick!
you also forgot the ARP omni 2 and Quadra as well as the Yamaha gx1 and vs 80 the polyusion and the Roland system 700
Give it 10 years and AI will have this under wraps for us all to enjoy.
No deal. We rather have it now and master it.
2:51 to 3:59 it sound like a horror movie in 70s
3:33
4:30
The RML should read EML electrocomp.
I'm CURIOUS: I've NEVER had enough money to buy ANY Synthesizer, BUT, I have a Kindle Fire Tablet. On the APP STORE, there is an APK called CAUSTIC 3.2. I IMMEDIATELY GOT IT. IT HAS 9 synths, a tonewheel (Hammond like!), a vocoder, 12 fx pedals that you can use (2 per Instrument), a mixer, ad a master board.
The synthesizers include a modular (moog-type) that you can use up to 16 modules on( I made one that HAD 8 waveform generators (oscillators)). Once you've got a setup that you like, you save it, then when you want to use it go to the saved list and tap 'load' and it's there! The modular also has an arpeggiator, and an oscilloscope so you can SEE the waveform that you've created.
The other synths are each different from each other: A pad synth, a synth that specializes in string and oriental type sounds, a Bass Synth, a sub synth, an 8 bit synth for those who want to go back to the Radio Shack Synth days.
The modular synth also has a Machine Input module that sends sounds from ANY of the synths(up to 3 per M.I!) to the modular synth, which you can use the arpeggiator and/or oscilloscope on.
IF YOU DON'T HAVE CAUSTIC 3.2, GET IT!!! "WHY?" ( This will cinch the deal!!!) IT IS FREE, FREE, FREE!!!!!!!
p.s. Caustic can be connected, by MIDI, to a keyboard! 1 person from an ELP tribute band put me down for even posting this on FB! He laughed at me and asked if C3.2 would LOOK as impressive, on stage, as his MOOG Model 55. If I could talk to him in person, I'd say "Change your synth to sound like THIS, and back again." In LESS THAN 5 SECONDS I WOULD BE DONE!!! Then I would say "SO LONG, DUMB-$#!T" and walk away!
IF ANYONE OUT THERE HAS CAUSTIC 3.2 TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK OF IT!!!???? THANX!
I forgot to mention that it also has a sequencer, a beat box, and each keyboard can be programmed to play notes. I, at one time, had several keyboards playing the ending of KARN EVIL 9 3RD IMPRESSION, starting out slow, and increasing the speed until it was just a 'sonic blur'.
@@firstnamelastname3574 Just get a cheap MIDI controller.
the 800dv has a spy vs spy goin on
Yamaha CS80
wow
Anyone knows the song used as demo at 6:40 for the EML ElectroComp 100 ? Massive..
"VST of Vintage Synthesizer 1970-1979" please.
I want the emu!
QUICK HOLLY RUN, ITS THE SLEESTAKS!!!
Where is CS-80?
Awesome!
My Modular has the same Sound!
Loving it! Thanks for providing this!
and it's all going into my sampler...
was that demo near 1:20 supposed to be Pink Floyds Echoes? it sounded very similar
lol I thought it sounded like the Duracell Sound
does anyone know what make/model Hot buttered used for the song "Popcorn" ?
minimoog model d
Incrível!!!!
5:23-5:57 sounds like 80s Funk/Soul bass
6:41-6:55 sounds like EBM bass
I had an RML; bought it new. However, I lost it while in college in Maine, and have no idea where it is now. I still have the manual and original Bill of Payment. Stolen? Did I just leave it in a dorm?
I got hyped at 1:40 im a tyler fan
Tarkus sounds at the beginning
estos son vst? cómo conseguiste poder tocarlos a todos?? en un museo?
На очень старых синтах можно делать очень современную музыку
where is CS-80, Oberheim Voice-8 ?
Not gonna lie the the first demo sounds way too clean for a moog filter.
4:50 the recognizes from Tron.
61 keybord or less toy
Japanese➡61鍵盤以下は玩具
I have YAMAHA EOS-B2000
Japanese➡ヤマハEOS- B2000を持っています
Maravillas
Around 6:55 you have an EML-101 pictured. It’s not RML. And it’s not the 100.
un beau voyage !
I wonder if someone know what synth / sound is used in Boney M - Ma Baker, in the Solo.