The asha'ria and their misguidance are the worst of the worst Ibn qudamah [620 H]: And we do not know amongst the people of innovation, any group who conceal their saying, and do not have the boldness to proclaim it openly except the Heretics and the Ash'ariyyah. وقال: "ولا نعرف في أهل البدع طائفة يكتمون مقالتهم ولا يتجاسرون على إظهارها إلا الزنادقة والأشعرية." [كتاب المناظرة في القرآن (ص35)]
@Tahmid Alpha12 I literally was in the zoom meeting mentioning Mohammed Hijabs name, try harder. He did spoke about daees belittling great scholars and he even went further calling them "khawarij" but hey you are deaf to truth and rather want to remain like that.
This is some of the most important points people need to understand especially from the social media age. Debating is a skill not a hobby. Just because someone asks you to debate on your social media platform, doesn't mean you should. This is an utter disrespect of the religion that anyone with a keyboard and a mouth believes they're qualified to debate. It's like two high schoolers debating intricate details of rocket science. Would you take them seriously? No. You would consider them ignorant and ill mannered. How much more the religion of Allah?
JazakAllah Khair for clearing this matter sheikh, it's sad that these days anyone can make a Twitter account and debate over sensitive matters of Aqeedah(without having any knowledge) so casually and are quick to label the scholars of the past.
@@muhammadaaus105 There was a brother (a Da'I) on Twitter who started quoting Ibn Qudamah and misrepresenting his views. he refused to listen to those who were correcting him. Sadly he still does
Jazakallahu khair. Finding you was a blessing for me. This debate had been causing conflicts in my mind. May Allah give you more ilm and understanding of Islam.
@Tahmid Alpha12 assalamualaikum there has been a debate going on twitter regarding this matter. It caused the conflict in mind in such way that I also felt like to question about forbidden things in Islam but Alhamdulillah sheikh cleared it for me. And some of my Arabic friends did so too. Jazakallahu khair
Wahhabiyah najdiyah in my country Indonesia claim that Allah subhaanahu wataala has hands all left hands has fingers face leg. But not the same like us people
I'm so happy you addressed this ya shiekh some people think they can do their own itjtihad talk on intricate aqeedah matters when they can't even grasp the Arabic language
Tafwid - means leaving meaning to Allah. Tafwid Khayfah - Leaving How of an attribute to Allah. (Correct) Tawfid Maa'nah - Leave/reject meaning of (a revealed) Attribute to Allah. (False) Ibn Qudamah We do not accept meaning opposite Apparent Meaning! Imam Malik says Istiwa is known, Kayfa is unknown! ibn Hanbal - We believe in those siffat, tasdig, w/o kayf and we don't give maa'naa.... meaning we our selves don't give meaning or don't do tawil but we accept its apparent meaning. 10 :45 - Ibn Uthaymin in Sharr Lum Itiqad, we don't give our own meaning opposing apparent like ppl of tawil.
We shouldn't even want to claim him tbh, he isn't from the salaf. He did tafwidh al-ma'na for the sifat khabariyyah (يد، عين) but he affirmed the sifat fi'liyyah (kalaam) and he also affirmed uluw'. So he's not the same as the asha'ria mufawidh but is a mufawidh nonetheless
@Abu Ishaaq Abdullaah what the hell are you talking about? How's claiming Ibn Qudamah or not on the matters of creed "picking and choosing" your deen? Pack your shit up and be quiet. He isn't the only scholar in the world. There's many uluma' earlier that I take from in aqidah. Ibn qudamah did tafwidh al-ma'na on the sifat khabariyyah whether you like it or not.
@@DrJames_YT Ibn Qudama in Lum’at al-I’tiqad: ‘Verses in relation to Allah’s attributes is the saying of Allah, ‘the Face of your Lord…’, & ‘Rather His two Hands are outstretched’. *‘These texts and the like, the chain of which has been authenticated, and the narrators of which are upright, we believe in them, and do not reject them nor deny them, nor do we give them a ta’wil which opposes their dhahir.’*
@@ibnmuhammad9027 The Meaning is in the word, otherwise you say its a metaphor and do a partial rejection of the ayat if you don't have a dalil its figurative. and we look at the verses together, as tafsir ibn Kathir Q 2 :25 says, the similarity of this life and the next is only in names, Quran 16 :60 and for Allah is the highest description
This is why being A Muslim is an endeavoring journey cause knowledge never put limits and your expiry date for knowledge age is the last breath comes from your body. #KnowledgeIsSweet WhenYouUnderstand
Ibn qudamah [620 H]: وقال: "ولا نعرف في أهل البدع طائفة يكتمون مقالتهم ولا يتجاسرون على إظهارها إلا الزنادقة والأشعرية." [كتاب المناظرة في القرآن (ص35)] And we do not know amongst the people of innovation, any faction who conceal their saying, and do not have the boldness to proclaim it (openly) except the Heretics (Zanaadiqah) and the Ash'ariyyah.
Jazak Allahu Khayran shaykhna Uthman for this beautiful explanation, wallahi this is real knowledge that is an obligation for every Muslim to learn otherwise we can out of our own opinion without any knowledge end up misguiding our own selves or others.
Masha Allah laquatay illabilla. Very complicated topic. It all pays in the end ur effort dedication and ur relentless unyielding quest to learn . U spend years learning Fusa Arabic to better understand Quran. Allhumdulilah. What is best that u don’t entertain text that is not documented. JazakAllah Khair. May Allah give u and ur family ajar for enlightening us with deep understanding of Islam . May Allah give ajar to all the team of masjid Al Ribat and OMF . And RUclips to make this possible.
@@marwan_ht93 It's true, overwhelming majority of Hanbalis including the founder were Muffawids. I mean during Twitter war it was Ash'aris and Atharis vs Mujassima.
@@marwan_ht93 Ibn Qudama in Lum’at al-I’tiqad: ‘Verses in relation to Allah’s attributes is the saying of Allah, ‘the Face of your Lord…’, & ‘Rather His two Hands are outstretched’. *‘These texts and the like, the chain of which has been authenticated, and the narrators of which are upright, we believe in them, and do not reject them nor deny them, nor do we give them a ta’wil which opposes their dhahir.’*
@@lumiam6982 Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal was no a Muwafid. He and the other 4 mathhab and 6 hadith imams were all Athari who affirmed Allah's Istiwa in a true sense! Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d. 241 H.) : Abu Yusuf bin Musa Al-Qattan said: "It was said to Abu Abdullah Ahmad ibn Hanbal: ‘Allah -Azza wa Jal- is above the seventh Heaven on His Throne separate from His creation, and His Ability and Knowledge is everywhere?’ He replied: «Yes, over the Throne, and no place is free from His Knowledge.»” (18) Sharh I`tiqad Ahl AsSunnah by Al-Lalikai (3/402); And it was narrated by al-Khalal in “As-Sunnah” from his Shaykh Yusuf bin Musa Al-Qattan, as is mentioned in “Kitab al-Arsh” by Adh-Dhahabi (2/247), and “Al-Uluw” (p.176), so the chain is sahih.
@@marwan_ht93 btw Jake after his recent debate with that shiuh aga khan guy became Athari and quoted : Shaikh ‘Abdul-Qaadir al-Jeelaanee (d. 561H) said, “It is essential to carry the attribute of Allaah’s al-Istiwaa (Allaah’s Ascending) upon its apparent sense, without ta’weel, and that He ascended by His Dhaat (self) over the Throne. Istiwaa does not mean sitting or touching, as the Mujassimah and Karraamiyyah say. Nor does it mean ‘uluww (grandeur and highness), as the Ash’ariyyah say; nor does it mean isteela (conquering and dominating over), as the Mu’tazilah say. None of this is related in the Sharee’ah. Neither has this been related by any one of the Salafus-Saalih (Pious Predecessors) from the Sahaabah and the Taabi’een, nor from the Ashaabul-Hadeeth (Scholars of Hadeeth). Rather, it is related from them that they carried the meaning of Istiwaa with its apparent meaning.” 174 174 Al-Ghuniyatut-Taalibeen, of ‘Abdul-Qaadir al-Jeelaanee, 1/50.
Quotes from ibn al-Uthaymīn were given from his commentary on al-Lum’ah but the speaker forgot to mention the following: أما ما ذكره في “اللمعة” فإنه ينطبق على مذهب المفوضة، وهو من شر المذاهب وأخبثها، والمصنف -رحمه الله- إمام في السنة، وهو أبعد الناس عن مذهب المفوضة وغيرهم من المبتدعة، والله أعلم [تعليق مختصر على لمعة الإعتقاد للعثيمين ج ١ ص ٣١] “As for what he mentioned in ‘al-Lum’ah‘, then indeed, he was an adherent upon the methodology of the Mufawwiḍah, it is from the worst of methodologies and the filthiest of them. The author, may Allāh have mercy on him, is an Imām in the Sunnah and he is the furthest of the people from the methodology of the Mufawwiḍah and others beside them from the innovators. And Allāh knows best.” [Ta’liq Mukhtasar ‘alā Kitāb Lum’at al-I’tiqād al-Hādī ilā Sabīl al-Rashād, 1/31] Clear admission by the one quoted himself that ibn Qudāmah was a Mufawwidh of the meaning! Everyone who sees this video should search and read the article “Imam Ibn Qudamah the Mufawwidh”
@Tahmid Alpha12 May Allah reward you abuntantly for intending to show me good do you know who yasir qadhi is? Lots of students of scholars spoke about him an said that he is not reliable and one of the reasons being that he said calling upon the the dead is harram but not shirk. And anybody who reads the Quran knows this to be a lie. There are countless verses of the Quran that speak against calling upon the dead, one of them being: “Such is Allaah, your Lord; His is the kingdom. And those, whom you invoke or call upon instead of Him, own not even a Qitmeer (the thin membrane over the date stone). If you invoke (or call upon) them, they hear not your call; and if (in case) they were to hear, they could not grant it (your request) to you. And on the Day of Resurrection, they will disown your worshipping them. And none can inform you (O Muhammad) like Him Who is the All-Knower (of everything)” [Faatir 35:13-14 - interpretation of the meaning] So Allah calls their prayers to others shirk. And even yasir qadhi (few years ago) spoke against calling upon the dead and he said it is shirk and he qouted the verse above. There are no two opinions in this matter,; calling upon the dead is shirk according to the Quran and the Sunnah
Baarakallaahu feek, please do not participate with the likes of Jake (non-Salafis) etc on RUclips Da'wah channels. I didn't even know who he was until I saw him in a video with you.
Allahuma barike, great that I found you. Al 7hmdoe lilah to the salaf way. Just talking with source and from books love it. Then making storytelling thing and laughing hahaha like other speakers
Some informations missing on his explanation of tafwid of ibn Qudamah, please check here : ruclips.net/video/pvaQL5Q6s4E/видео.html&ab_channel=Yunis%27Abdallah
Attributes, not body parts. U can't say that Allah has body parts. We say it's the attributes of Allah, lafaz and meaning is known, haqiqat is unknown and don't ask how. Just like 'ummul kitab' (mother of the book) in Arabic for example. Of course it doesn't mean that the book has a mother right?
9:41 why do we need a 21st century Salafi scholar to explain a statement of Imam Ahmad so clear? Tifwidh Al-Mana has been the position of the Atharis from day one. The Salafis are ignorant in kalam and Aqeedah.
Unfortunately shaykh Uthman, every sharh you used is a contemporary sharh which is the point of contention. You will need to bring other shawahid from the classical books of the Hanabila themselves explaining this issue. It is difficult to circumvent this point when the canonized aqeedah of the Hanabila is tafweed al-ma'na and this is apparent in their books, those of aqeedah and usool. BarakAllahu feekum.
Shaykh Ibn Baaz (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Ahmad said concerning those who promote tafweed: They are worse than the Jahamis. Tafweed means saying: Only Allah knows what it means. This is not permissible because the meaning is known to the scholars. Maalik (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Istiwa’ (rising over) is known, but how it occurred is unknown. This was narrated from Imam Rabee‘ah ibn Abi ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan and from other scholars. The meanings of the divine attributes are known to and understood by Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah, such as pleasure, anger, love, rising over, smiling and so on. These are meanings that are distinct from other meanings. Smiling is something other than pleasure; pleasure is something other than anger; anger is something other than love; hearing is something other than seeing. All of them are known to be attributes of Allah, may He be exalted, but they cannot be likened to the attributes of created beings. End quote. Fataawa Noor ‘ala ad-Darb by Ibn Baaz, p. 65 He also said: Imam Ahmad (may Allah have mercy on him) and other leading scholars of the early generations denounced those who promoted tafweed and regarded them as innovators because what their view implied was that Allah, may He be exalted, addressed to His slaves something the meaning of which they could not understand or know what He meant by it. But Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, is far above such a thing and Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah know what He, may He be glorified, meant by His words; they ascribe to Him what is implied by His names and attributes and they declare Him to be above anything that is not befitting to Him. They know from His words and from the words of His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that He has the attribute of absolute perfection in all that He has told us Himself or that His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) has told us about Him. End quote. Majmoo‘ Fataawa Ibn Baaz, 3/55
@@3GHee4erwer Ibn Baz (RA) vs Imam Hafid Al Dahabi (RA) and Imam Ibn Qudamah (RA). The chain Ibn Baz (RA) got is fabricated and forged according to Imam Hafid Al-Dahabi (RA). The most authentic variants transmitted from Imam Malik (RA) with isnad is the following version narrated by Hafid Imam Al-Bayhaqi (RA): From Ibn Wahb: “We were with Malik when a man asked him: ‘O Abu `Abd Allah! “al-Rahman ‘ala ‘arshi stawa” (20:5): how is His istiwa?’ Malik lowered his head and began to sweat profusely. Then he lifted up his head and said: ‘”al-Rahman ‘ala ‘arshi stawa” just as He described Himself. One cannot ask “how.” “How” does not apply to Him. And you are an evil man, a man of innovation. Take him out!’ The man was led out.” [Imam Al-Dhahabi (RA) said regarding this: al Bayhaqi brought it with an authentic isnad from abi rabi’ from Ibn Wahb…. Imam Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar (RA) said: Al-Bayhaqi’s isnad from Ibn Wahb is good. Implication: If ‘How’ or modality does not even apply to Him then any idea of not knowing a ‘How’ or Modality is impossible. Imam Ibn Qudamah (RA) refutes Bin Baz (RA) regarding Tafwid and explains the true creed of the Salaf. وعلموا أن المتكلم بها صادق لا شك في صدقه فصدقوه ولم يعلموا حقيقة معناها فسكتوا عما لم يعلموه وأخذ ذلك الآخر والأول ووصى بعضهم بعضا بحسن الإتباع والوقوف حيث وقف أولهم وحذروا من التجاوز لهم والعدول عن طريقهم وبينوا لهم سبيلهم ومذهبهم ونرجوا أن يجعلنا الله تعالى ممن اقتدى بهم في بيان ما بينوه وسلوك الطريق الذي سلكوه “And they (the Salaf) knew that the One who spoke them (Allah) was truthful without doubt, so they believed Him. And they did not know the reality of their meanings [i.e. the Attributes], so they were silent about what they did not know. The later and the earlier ones adhered to this. Thus, they strongly advised one another of good obedience and stopping where their formers stopped. And they warned from exceeding their bounds and diverging from their [i.e. the Salaf’s] path. Furthermore, they elucidated their methodology and doctrinal positions. We hope to Allah that He makes us from the ones who followed them in explaining what they explained and following the path that they traverse.” [Dhamm al-Ta’wīl, 1/11]
You can learn Arabic Akhi, join an institute for example, but the sheikh studied in Saudi if I’m not mistaken, in Makkah in the Islamic university : Umm Al Qura so of course he would know Arabic.
He spend 5 years and more in Dubai and Saudia to learn Fusa Arabic to understand Quran and got masters In fiqh, and got ijaza from Saudia to explain hadeese. He still learns and studies. Allhumdulilah
In his book "Idâhou d-Dalîl fî Qat'i Houjaji ahli t-ta'tîl" (pages 108) the Qâdî Badrou d-Dîn Ibnou Jamâ'ah a-Chafi'iy said: «إنّه - يعني الإمام أحمد بن حنبل - كان لا يقول بالجهة للباري تعالى» “Certainly Imam Ahmad Ibnu Hanbal never attributed direction to Al-Bârî (The Creator: that is to say Allah)” - The Qâdî (judge), the Faqih (specialist in jurisprudence), the Mouhaddith (specialist in the science of Hadîth), the Chaykh Badrou d-Dîn Mouhammad Ibnou Ibrâhîm known under the name of Ibnou Jamâ'ah was born in 639 in Hamah (Syria) and he died in 733 of the Hegira in Cairo (رحمه الله) that is to say about 700 years ago. He was the president of the Chafi'i judges in Egypt in his time.
Bro All of the explanations are by modern gulf scholars, you didn't bring a single classical scholar to explain the point. وين الشروحات من العلماء القديمة. كل شارح انت ذكرت من المعاصرين، كن عادلا، تكفى، جيب الشروحات من العلماء القديمة.
*listen what sayyidina Imam al Bukhari, raḍiAllahu anhu said: Allah has hands, eyes...but they are not physical, is the debate now over, or is there an ahmaq ready to refute imam al Sunnah?, rahmatullah aalayh wa arḍaah*
Funny guy, he keeps saying scholars of the salaf but the guys he quotes are contemporary people like uthamymeen or barrak. Lol. Stop embarassing yourself.
8:30 u add words to imam malik. imam malik said we affirm istiwa has happend thats not uknown. however what it means and how is unknown. this is what is implied
Its very unfortunate of shaykh to have left out the whole sentence from the book of imam ibn qudamah hambali RH. He quoted half of the sentence and ledt out the other half where he clearly meant the meaning known to us is not attributed to Allah. The whole context of his discussion was that meaning is known to us in language but the same meaning cannot be given when it comes to Allah swt, infact in one place he mentioned no one knows Arabic language more than our Nabi sallallahu alaihi wasallam, so if we consign one meaning to these sifaat then how can we say that's the correct meaning of this sifaat and not the other.
Bi la kayf- without a how. "HOW" doesn't apply to Allah ta'ala nor His Attributes reasons being: "kayfiyyah (how or modality)" by clear definition even in the arabic language relates to: an incident, an event, experence, expression, system, method, jawhar (particle), arad (attribute of a particle), or a jism (body) which is made up of a jawhar and arad and which has shape, form, depth, width, & length. All of those things are specific to creation & indicate that "HOW" only relates to created things. Allah ta 'ala is totally clear from those created things. Therefore "HOW" do not apply to Allah. To say we don't know "HOW" when it relates to Allah ta'ala or His Attributes is to affirm a "HOW" which is ilhad (blasphemy). Case close on this matter.
In his book "Daf'ou Choubahi t-Tachbîh" Imam Ibnou Al-Jawzi H597 al-Hanbali reports the creed of Ahmad ibn Hanbal : « كان أحمد - يعني الإمام أحمد بن حنبل - لا يقول بالجهة للباري » "Ahmad (i.e. Imam Ahmad Ibnu Hanbal) never assigned direction to Al-Bârî (The Creator: i.e. Allah) " - The Imam, the Hâfidh (specialist in the chains of transmission of the hadîth), the Mufassir (exegete) Abdou r-Rahmân Ibnou 'Ali known under the name of Ibnou l-Jawzi the Hanbalite, was born in 508 in Baghdâd and died in 597 of the Hegira in Baghdâd (رحمه الله) that is to say 835 years ago.
well his student Sheikh Al Islam Ibn Qudama disagrees. You must affirm for Allah the direction of Highness. Thats also what Sheikhul Islam Abdul Qadir al Jilani said.
The mute butcher, points to the sky as he cannot say bismillah when killing the animal. This is the fatawa of the hanbali school and amongst ahlul ilm. This is based on the hadith of the prophet s.a.w, in which he asked the girl where is Allah and she point to the sky. Take from this what you will.
You don't define the word "يد" by the dictionary as the heretics (asharis and their likes) force you to do since defining them by the dictionaries dwells into the kay'fiyyah which is what the salaf said not to indulge in and neither do dictionaries even define words by the apparent, in fact it's the opposite they do it by its denotative characteristics. So to define the apparent, we define يد by its function, due to trying to define it in line with dictionaries is incorrect as they use the denotative meaning which dwells into the kay'fiyyah. Like i keep mentioning, trying to define the sifat in line with dictionaries is faulty because they focus on particulars and a denotative meaning. Which again dwells into the kay'fiyyah; which is rejected (having knowledge of) There are types of definitions in the Arabic language: al-Rasm and al-Hadd, explaining by the rasm definition is what we do as the hadd [definition] dwells into the kay'fiyyah. So don't be forced by ahlul-bid'ah to define it by the dictionary. Its meaning would be "it is an eternal attribute established in Allah’s essence, by which He creates with (created Adam with both Hands, created the qalam, the Arsh, wrote the torah as mentioned by the hadith and etc.), he grips and folds with (surah Zumar: 37) and so on."
JazakAllahu Khayr for bringing a legitimate Hanbali work from a legitimate Hanbali Murji. But Ustad with all due respect, Ibn Qudama did not go around bashing the position of the rest of the Ummah, he gave the Hanbali position and left it be. Just because, Imam Hanbal said it, doesn't mean it is Hujjah. This debate will never end and the learned have learned to live with differences of opinion. Asharis are the majority of the Ummah and they have the overwhelming majority of the scholars and the Mujtahids. No, the majority is not in error according to the riwayah mutawatirah attributed to Prophet. For Asharis and Maturidis Allah simply does not have a hand, feet, shin or face (glory be to him far is he removed from human similarities and attributes) plain and simple - it is majaz. They are linguistic metaphorical expressions well known in the Arabic language that you claim to know so much.
*Allah existed before time and space, He existed the same before as He is now, and it is incorrect to say He is inside, or outside a space, or any of the 6 directions giving Him likeness to His Creation, there is nothing like Him.*
Istawa is known means the statement is known to people because the Quran states it, the kayf /how/modality is inapplicable for Allah this is what Imaam Malik meant , this is typical of wahabi/salafis to confuse what is clear these are people whose knowledge supersedes their intelligence.
The word is known the meaning is left with Allah ta'ala. There is a meaning that Allah ta’ala knows. Stop your misguided belief. None of the Scholars of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jama'ah had that understanding you hold that is the understanding of the Wahhabis. Taqwa Allah. Give your isnad of that understanding of that text.
It isnt Right to bring contemporary scholars to Proof a Point in aqeeda because it can always be Said that we dont accept them as ashaira for Proofing a Point. Rather it Should be Argued with Classical scholars from the past we both accept to Show that manaa Here means manaa kayfiyya.
*when Sayyiduna Umar RadhiAllahu anhu was asked about istiwa, he hit the person with a stick, until his head was bloody, the person after asking a few questions, said he understands now(there is no istiwa for Allah in a meaning of the Creation, having a space and time).*
Who you studied the matn with give your isnad & ijazah of the riwayah (narration) & diraayah (explanation). I guarantee it lead to Wahhaabis or Pseudo Salafis & not Ulama of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jama'ah. Taqwa Allah! You would judge for your misguidance.
Ibn Taimiyya nor Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah and their Wahhabi and "Salafi" subscribers in later times belong to the true Salaf al-Saliheen or to their school of thought.. They don't represent the 'Aqeedah of Ahl al-Haqq/ " The People of Truth".. The term denotes Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama'ah as opposed to the sects and is identical with "The Saved Group" ( al-firqat al-naajiya) mentioned in the Hadith of the Prophet Sallallaahu alayhi wa ala aalihi wa sahbihi wa sallam.. Ahl Sunnah wal Jama'ah consist of 3 groups: the textualist ( al-Athariyya), whose Imam is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal: the Ash'aris whose Imam is Abu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari: and the Maturidis, whose Imam is Abu Mansur al-Maaturiedi.. They are all one sect , the saved sect, and they are Ahl al-Hadith.. ( al-Saffarienie) Anyone that deviates from this meaning is an innovator.. Ahl Sunnah wal Jama'ah: " People of the Way of the Prophet and the Congregation of Muslims, also known as Sunni Muslims..
*Ibn Tayymiyah qadasAllahu sirruhu is buried between the Awliyaullah, alayhimur Ridwan in Damascus.* *He is buried as a sufi saint, Rahmatullahi alayhi, all of them are alive in their graves(asking people like them, who are alive in their graves, for help is Sunnah, like Shuhada, awliyaullah, and prophets, alejhimus Salatu wa Salaam).*
Alhamdulilah shaykh, May Allah bless you for this great explanation.
The asha'ria and their misguidance are the worst of the worst
Ibn qudamah [620 H]: And we do not know amongst the people of innovation, any group who conceal their saying, and do not have the boldness to proclaim it openly except the Heretics and the Ash'ariyyah.
وقال: "ولا نعرف في أهل البدع طائفة يكتمون مقالتهم ولا يتجاسرون على إظهارها إلا الزنادقة والأشعرية."
[كتاب المناظرة في القرآن (ص35)]
@Tahmid Alpha12 I literally was in the zoom meeting mentioning Mohammed Hijabs name, try harder. He did spoke about daees belittling great scholars and he even went further calling them "khawarij" but hey you are deaf to truth and rather want to remain like that.
@@one_dawah ewa broer
This is some of the most important points people need to understand especially from the social media age. Debating is a skill not a hobby. Just because someone asks you to debate on your social media platform, doesn't mean you should. This is an utter disrespect of the religion that anyone with a keyboard and a mouth believes they're qualified to debate. It's like two high schoolers debating intricate details of rocket science. Would you take them seriously? No. You would consider them ignorant and ill mannered. How much more the religion of Allah?
JazakAllah Khair for clearing this matter sheikh, it's sad that these days anyone can make a Twitter account and debate over sensitive matters of Aqeedah(without having any knowledge) so casually and are quick to label the scholars of the past.
Asalām-Alaykum. Can you please tell me what had happened that led Sheikh Uthmān to make this video?
@@muhammadaaus105 There was a brother (a Da'I) on Twitter who started quoting Ibn Qudamah and misrepresenting his views. he refused to listen to those who were correcting him. Sadly he still does
@@mustafafaruqi2097
Who was the brother?
Jazakallahu khair. Finding you was a blessing for me. This debate had been causing conflicts in my mind.
May Allah give you more ilm and understanding of Islam.
@Tahmid Alpha12 assalamualaikum there has been a debate going on twitter regarding this matter. It caused the conflict in mind in such way that I also felt like to question about forbidden things in Islam but Alhamdulillah sheikh cleared it for me. And some of my Arabic friends did so too.
Jazakallahu khair
@Tahmid Alpha12 i agree but we can't do anything if we just stumble upon such things then we have to clear our minds.
Keep it simple. Allah has all the attributes mentioned in the quran in a manner that befits his majesty. May Allah bless the shaykh.
And don’t go beyond that 👍
Then stop claiming that Allah is sitting on his throne
That’s the Ash’ari position
Wahhabiyah najdiyah in my country Indonesia claim that Allah subhaanahu wataala has hands all left hands has fingers face leg. But not the same like us people
@@pocophone2010 Nothing wrong with it if the attributes are not likened to the creation
I'm so happy you addressed this ya shiekh some people think they can do their own itjtihad talk on intricate aqeedah matters when they can't even grasp the Arabic language
This has easened the heart. Thank you, Sheikh!
Clicked as soon as it was sent to me on Twitter by the Sheikh - jazakhallah khairan, beloved sheikh.
Masha Allah,this was very necessary.May Allah protect us from ignorance and arrogance.
Alhamdulillah.. JazakAllah khair Ustadh.. The explanation is crystal clear..
Barakalahu feek sheykh a lot of innovaters trying to debating this topic without knowledge
JazakAllahu khayran Shaykh very beneficial may Allah the Most High bless Shaykh Uthman
Wow this was much needed
JizaakAllah khayr ustaadh may Allah preserve you and grant you Shahadah in His cause, Ameen
Tafwid - means leaving meaning to Allah.
Tafwid Khayfah - Leaving How of an attribute to Allah. (Correct)
Tawfid Maa'nah - Leave/reject meaning of (a revealed) Attribute to Allah. (False)
Ibn Qudamah We do not accept meaning opposite Apparent Meaning!
Imam Malik says Istiwa is known, Kayfa is unknown!
ibn Hanbal - We believe in those siffat, tasdig, w/o kayf and we don't give maa'naa.... meaning we our selves don't give meaning or don't do tawil but we accept its apparent meaning.
10 :45 - Ibn Uthaymin in Sharr Lum Itiqad, we don't give our own meaning opposing apparent like ppl of tawil.
We shouldn't even want to claim him tbh, he isn't from the salaf. He did tafwidh al-ma'na for the sifat khabariyyah (يد، عين) but he affirmed the sifat fi'liyyah (kalaam) and he also affirmed uluw'. So he's not the same as the asha'ria mufawidh but is a mufawidh nonetheless
@Abu Ishaaq Abdullaah what the hell are you talking about?
How's claiming Ibn Qudamah or not on the matters of creed "picking and choosing" your deen? Pack your shit up and be quiet. He isn't the only scholar in the world. There's many uluma' earlier that I take from in aqidah. Ibn qudamah did tafwidh al-ma'na on the sifat khabariyyah whether you like it or not.
@@DrJames_YT Ibn Qudama in Lum’at al-I’tiqad: ‘Verses in relation to Allah’s attributes is the saying of Allah, ‘the Face of your Lord…’, & ‘Rather His two Hands are outstretched’. *‘These texts and the like, the chain of which has been authenticated, and the narrators of which are upright, we believe in them, and do not reject them nor deny them, nor do we give them a ta’wil which opposes their dhahir.’*
tafweed mana means we affirm...but we dunno the meaning and the how. thats to Allah swt. but we do agree with the verse
@@ibnmuhammad9027 The Meaning is in the word, otherwise you say its a metaphor and do a partial rejection of the ayat if you don't have a dalil its figurative.
and we look at the verses together, as tafsir ibn Kathir Q 2 :25 says, the similarity of this life and the next is only in names, Quran 16 :60 and for Allah is the highest description
This is why being A Muslim is an endeavoring journey cause knowledge never put limits and your expiry date for knowledge age is the last breath comes from your body.
#KnowledgeIsSweet
WhenYouUnderstand
Ibn qudamah [620 H]:
وقال: "ولا نعرف في أهل البدع طائفة يكتمون مقالتهم ولا يتجاسرون على إظهارها إلا الزنادقة والأشعرية."
[كتاب المناظرة في القرآن (ص35)]
And we do not know amongst the people of innovation, any faction who conceal their saying, and do not have the boldness to proclaim it (openly) except the Heretics (Zanaadiqah) and the Ash'ariyyah.
Jazakhallahukhair very beneficial
Jazak Allahu Khayran shaykhna Uthman for this beautiful explanation, wallahi this is real knowledge that is an obligation for every Muslim to learn otherwise we can out of our own opinion without any knowledge end up misguiding our own selves or others.
jazakallahu khair. great and nice advice
Loving the deen from park ave in the sunny Tucson Arizona #OMFsaabiqoon
May Allah bless you and reward you for the hard work
Mashā'Allāh this is beautiful 👍🏼👍🏼
Jazakalahu khairan from Indonesia
Masha Allah laquatay illabilla. Very complicated topic. It all pays in the end ur effort dedication and ur relentless unyielding quest to learn . U spend years learning Fusa Arabic to better understand Quran. Allhumdulilah. What is best that u don’t entertain text that is not documented. JazakAllah Khair. May Allah give u and ur family ajar for enlightening us with deep understanding of Islam . May Allah give ajar to all the team of masjid Al Ribat and OMF . And RUclips to make this possible.
I love this shaykh
May ALLAH BLESS YOU
love the outro mash'Allah
بارك الله فيه ، زادك الله علمك
جزاك الله خيرا شيخ عثمان
Thank you this was needed because of the controversy on Twitter yesterday.
What happened? Can someone tell?
@@marwan_ht93 It's true, overwhelming majority of Hanbalis including the founder were Muffawids. I mean during Twitter war it was Ash'aris and Atharis vs Mujassima.
@@marwan_ht93 Ibn Qudama in Lum’at al-I’tiqad: ‘Verses in relation to Allah’s attributes is the saying of Allah, ‘the Face of your Lord…’, & ‘Rather His two Hands are outstretched’. *‘These texts and the like, the chain of which has been authenticated, and the narrators of which are upright, we believe in them, and do not reject them nor deny them, nor do we give them a ta’wil which opposes their dhahir.’*
@@lumiam6982 Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal was no a Muwafid. He and the other 4 mathhab and 6 hadith imams were all Athari who affirmed Allah's Istiwa in a true sense!
Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d. 241 H.) :
Abu Yusuf bin Musa Al-Qattan said: "It was said to Abu Abdullah Ahmad ibn Hanbal: ‘Allah -Azza wa Jal- is above the seventh Heaven on His Throne separate from His creation, and His Ability and Knowledge is everywhere?’
He replied: «Yes, over the Throne, and no place is free from His Knowledge.»”
(18) Sharh I`tiqad Ahl AsSunnah by Al-Lalikai (3/402);
And it was narrated by al-Khalal in “As-Sunnah” from his Shaykh Yusuf bin Musa Al-Qattan, as is mentioned in “Kitab al-Arsh” by Adh-Dhahabi (2/247), and “Al-Uluw” (p.176), so the chain is sahih.
@@marwan_ht93 btw Jake after his recent debate with that shiuh aga khan guy became Athari and quoted :
Shaikh ‘Abdul-Qaadir al-Jeelaanee (d. 561H) said,
“It is essential to carry the attribute of Allaah’s al-Istiwaa (Allaah’s Ascending) upon its apparent sense, without ta’weel, and that He ascended by His Dhaat (self) over the Throne.
Istiwaa does not mean sitting or touching, as the Mujassimah and Karraamiyyah say.
Nor does it mean ‘uluww (grandeur and highness), as the Ash’ariyyah say; nor does it mean isteela (conquering and dominating over), as the Mu’tazilah say.
None of this is related in the Sharee’ah. Neither has this been related by any one of the Salafus-Saalih (Pious Predecessors) from the Sahaabah and the Taabi’een, nor from the Ashaabul-Hadeeth (Scholars of Hadeeth). Rather, it is related from them that they carried the meaning of Istiwaa with its apparent meaning.” 174
174 Al-Ghuniyatut-Taalibeen, of ‘Abdul-Qaadir al-Jeelaanee, 1/50.
Finally I realised why imam Shafii spent ten years with Bedouins to learn the pure arabic. Even though he was an arab
Sh Uthman spend 5 years in Middle East learning Fusa Arabic to understand Quran. MAsha Allah
I knew Imam Shafiee...but who is Sh Uthman? He is Imam?Mujtahed?
@@abumoe no, he is the speaker in this video
Mash’Allah
أسّلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Is Hafiz Abu Yahya Noorpuri one of the teachers of Sheikh Uthman ibn Farooq? Can someone please answer this?
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته
No he is not
That’s what you need
الله يحفظك يا شيخ
Loved this video!
Quotes from ibn al-Uthaymīn were given from his commentary on al-Lum’ah but the speaker forgot to mention the following:
أما ما ذكره في “اللمعة” فإنه ينطبق على مذهب المفوضة، وهو من شر المذاهب وأخبثها، والمصنف -رحمه الله- إمام في السنة، وهو أبعد الناس عن مذهب المفوضة وغيرهم من المبتدعة، والله أعلم
[تعليق مختصر على لمعة الإعتقاد للعثيمين ج ١ ص ٣١]
“As for what he mentioned in ‘al-Lum’ah‘, then indeed, he was an adherent upon the methodology of the Mufawwiḍah, it is from the worst of methodologies and the filthiest of them. The author, may Allāh have mercy on him, is an Imām in the Sunnah and he is the furthest of the people from the methodology of the Mufawwiḍah and others beside them from the innovators. And Allāh knows best.” [Ta’liq Mukhtasar ‘alā Kitāb Lum’at al-I’tiqād al-Hādī ilā Sabīl al-Rashād, 1/31]
Clear admission by the one quoted himself that ibn Qudāmah was a Mufawwidh of the meaning! Everyone who sees this video should search and read the article “Imam Ibn Qudamah the Mufawwidh”
You see how this distorter who doesn't know how read Arabic tried to manipulate, lmao.
May Allah guide us all. Ameen
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Will Shaykh Uthman be coming to Dallas?
وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته
Yes إن شاء الله
Oct. 21 - 24 2021
@@MasjidRibat جزاك الله خيرا
Do you know what Masjid?
Assalamu ALikeum, can you please continue your usool at-tafseer series?
You only made 2 videos on this series
May Allah reward you immensely
@@deenreloaded
I mean this:
ruclips.net/p/PL6B-aCDgHR4hP6lRX1fJ846AOWGsgktEk
I stand corrected.
@@deenreloaded ??
I thought you were talking about the Seerah series. I misread seerah for Tafseer.
@Tahmid Alpha12
May Allah reward you abuntantly for intending to show me good
do you know who yasir qadhi is?
Lots of students of scholars spoke about him an said that he is not reliable and one of the reasons being that he said calling upon the the dead is harram but not shirk.
And anybody who reads the Quran knows this to be a lie.
There are countless verses of the Quran that speak against calling upon the dead, one of them being:
“Such is Allaah, your Lord; His is the kingdom. And those, whom you invoke or call upon instead of Him, own not even a Qitmeer (the thin membrane over the date stone).
If you invoke (or call upon) them, they hear not your call; and if (in case) they were to hear, they could not grant it (your request) to you. And on the Day of Resurrection, they will disown your worshipping them. And none can inform you (O Muhammad) like Him Who is the All-Knower (of everything)”
[Faatir 35:13-14 - interpretation of the meaning]
So Allah calls their prayers to others shirk.
And even yasir qadhi (few years ago) spoke against calling upon the dead and he said it is shirk and he qouted the verse above.
There are no two opinions in this matter,; calling upon the dead is shirk according to the Quran and the Sunnah
جزاكم الله خيرا
Jazakallah. I wish we had pdf English translations of all these books
Baarakallaahu feek, please do not participate with the likes of Jake (non-Salafis) etc on RUclips Da'wah channels. I didn't even know who he was until I saw him in a video with you.
Allahuma barike, great that I found you. Al 7hmdoe lilah to the salaf way. Just talking with source and from books love it. Then making storytelling thing and laughing hahaha like other speakers
Some informations missing on his explanation of tafwid of ibn Qudamah, please check here :
ruclips.net/video/pvaQL5Q6s4E/видео.html&ab_channel=Yunis%27Abdallah
ما شاء الله و جزاك الله خيرا. Seakh how to contact with you
Alhamdulillah, Ibnu qudama is mufawwidh
So according to this method, Allah has body parts hand, face, eyes but how only Allah knows?
Attributes, not body parts. U can't say that Allah has body parts. We say it's the attributes of Allah, lafaz and meaning is known, haqiqat is unknown and don't ask how. Just like 'ummul kitab' (mother of the book) in Arabic for example. Of course it doesn't mean that the book has a mother right?
*what say you about Sayyidina imam Al Atham and sayyidina Shaykh Abdal Qadir al Jilani?, raḍiAllahu Ta'aalaa anhumA*
Establishing the meaning (mana) establishes the kayfiyyah the how-to
9:41 why do we need a 21st century Salafi scholar to explain a statement of Imam Ahmad so clear? Tifwidh Al-Mana has been the position of the Atharis from day one. The Salafis are ignorant in kalam and Aqeedah.
Alhamdullilah.
احبك from egypt 😍😘
❤
I don't have much knowledge I was on twitter brother jake metaphysician was talking about it..
Is this book Lumatul Ittiqad available in english?
"The Illuminating Creed"
Unfortunately shaykh Uthman, every sharh you used is a contemporary sharh which is the point of contention. You will need to bring other shawahid from the classical books of the Hanabila themselves explaining this issue. It is difficult to circumvent this point when the canonized aqeedah of the Hanabila is tafweed al-ma'na and this is apparent in their books, those of aqeedah and usool. BarakAllahu feekum.
Shaykh Ibn Baaz (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
Ahmad said concerning those who promote tafweed: They are worse than the Jahamis. Tafweed means saying: Only Allah knows what it means. This is not permissible because the meaning is known to the scholars. Maalik (may Allah have mercy on him) said: Istiwa’ (rising over) is known, but how it occurred is unknown. This was narrated from Imam Rabee‘ah ibn Abi ‘Abd ar-Rahmaan and from other scholars. The meanings of the divine attributes are known to and understood by Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah, such as pleasure, anger, love, rising over, smiling and so on. These are meanings that are distinct from other meanings. Smiling is something other than pleasure; pleasure is something other than anger; anger is something other than love; hearing is something other than seeing. All of them are known to be attributes of Allah, may He be exalted, but they cannot be likened to the attributes of created beings. End quote.
Fataawa Noor ‘ala ad-Darb by Ibn Baaz, p. 65
He also said:
Imam Ahmad (may Allah have mercy on him) and other leading scholars of the early generations denounced those who promoted tafweed and regarded them as innovators because what their view implied was that Allah, may He be exalted, addressed to His slaves something the meaning of which they could not understand or know what He meant by it. But Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, is far above such a thing and Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa‘ah know what He, may He be glorified, meant by His words; they ascribe to Him what is implied by His names and attributes and they declare Him to be above anything that is not befitting to Him. They know from His words and from the words of His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) that He has the attribute of absolute perfection in all that He has told us Himself or that His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) has told us about Him. End quote.
Majmoo‘ Fataawa Ibn Baaz, 3/55
@@3GHee4erwer Ibn Baz (RA) vs Imam Hafid Al Dahabi (RA) and Imam Ibn Qudamah (RA). The chain Ibn Baz (RA) got is fabricated and forged according to Imam Hafid Al-Dahabi (RA).
The most authentic variants transmitted from Imam Malik (RA) with isnad is the following version narrated by Hafid Imam Al-Bayhaqi (RA):
From Ibn Wahb: “We were with Malik when a man asked him: ‘O Abu `Abd Allah! “al-Rahman ‘ala ‘arshi stawa” (20:5): how is His istiwa?’ Malik lowered his head and began to sweat profusely. Then he lifted up his head and said: ‘”al-Rahman ‘ala ‘arshi stawa” just as He described Himself. One cannot ask “how.” “How” does not apply to Him. And you are an evil man, a man of innovation. Take him out!’ The man was led out.”
[Imam Al-Dhahabi (RA) said regarding this: al Bayhaqi brought it with an authentic isnad from abi rabi’ from Ibn Wahb….
Imam Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar (RA) said: Al-Bayhaqi’s isnad from Ibn Wahb is good.
Implication:
If ‘How’ or modality does not even apply to Him then any idea of not knowing a ‘How’ or Modality is impossible.
Imam Ibn Qudamah (RA) refutes Bin Baz (RA) regarding Tafwid and explains the true creed of the Salaf.
وعلموا أن المتكلم بها صادق لا شك في صدقه فصدقوه ولم يعلموا حقيقة معناها فسكتوا عما لم يعلموه وأخذ ذلك الآخر والأول ووصى بعضهم بعضا بحسن الإتباع والوقوف حيث وقف أولهم وحذروا من التجاوز لهم والعدول عن طريقهم وبينوا لهم سبيلهم ومذهبهم ونرجوا أن يجعلنا الله تعالى ممن اقتدى بهم في بيان ما بينوه وسلوك الطريق الذي سلكوه
“And they (the Salaf) knew that the One who spoke them (Allah) was truthful without doubt, so they believed Him. And they did not know the reality of their meanings [i.e. the Attributes], so they were silent about what they did not know. The later and the earlier ones adhered to this. Thus, they strongly advised one another of good obedience and stopping where their formers stopped. And they warned from exceeding their bounds and diverging from their [i.e. the Salaf’s] path. Furthermore, they elucidated their methodology and doctrinal positions. We hope to Allah that He makes us from the ones who followed them in explaining what they explained and following the path that they traverse.”
[Dhamm al-Ta’wīl, 1/11]
How did you get so good at understanding and speaking Arabic sheikh Uthman?
You can learn Arabic Akhi, join an institute for example, but the sheikh studied in Saudi if I’m not mistaken, in Makkah in the Islamic university : Umm Al Qura so of course he would know Arabic.
He spend 5 years and more in Dubai and Saudia to learn Fusa Arabic to understand Quran and got masters In fiqh, and got ijaza from Saudia to explain hadeese. He still learns and studies. Allhumdulilah
@@dinopalavra876 there’s literally a video of him arguing with a native arab speaker in fluent Arabic
In his book "Idâhou d-Dalîl fî Qat'i Houjaji ahli t-ta'tîl" (pages 108) the Qâdî Badrou d-Dîn Ibnou Jamâ'ah a-Chafi'iy said:
«إنّه - يعني الإمام أحمد بن حنبل - كان لا يقول بالجهة للباري تعالى»
“Certainly Imam Ahmad Ibnu Hanbal never attributed direction to Al-Bârî (The Creator: that is to say Allah)”
- The Qâdî (judge), the Faqih (specialist in jurisprudence), the Mouhaddith (specialist in the science of Hadîth), the Chaykh Badrou d-Dîn Mouhammad Ibnou Ibrâhîm known under the name of Ibnou Jamâ'ah was born in 639 in Hamah (Syria) and he died in 733 of the Hegira in Cairo (رحمه الله) that is to say about 700 years ago. He was the president of the Chafi'i judges in Egypt in his time.
From what I heard from scholars, Ibn Qudama left the meanings of the sifat to Allah, which is wrong. Only the hows should be left to Allahu Taalaa
Bro All of the explanations are by modern gulf scholars, you didn't bring a single classical scholar to explain the point.
وين الشروحات من العلماء القديمة.
كل شارح انت ذكرت من المعاصرين، كن عادلا، تكفى، جيب الشروحات من العلماء القديمة.
😊
How to contact shaikh uthmaan farooq hafidhullah 🥺
*listen what sayyidina Imam al Bukhari, raḍiAllahu anhu said: Allah has hands, eyes...but they are not physical, is the debate now over, or is there an ahmaq ready to refute imam al Sunnah?, rahmatullah aalayh wa arḍaah*
Ibn kodama mofwad meaning
You can revise these books
ذم التاويل
اثبات الحرف القديم
روضة الناضر
نصوصه مليئة بذلك راجع يا شيخ
Anyone know the name of the intro sound?
Funny guy, he keeps saying scholars of the salaf but the guys he quotes are contemporary people like uthamymeen or barrak. Lol.
Stop embarassing yourself.
Has the sheik refuted these individuals or only refuted the doubts being spread and how did the salaf deal with individuals who spread misguidance
8:30 u add words to imam malik. imam malik said we affirm istiwa has happend thats not uknown. however what it means and how is unknown. this is what is implied
Its very unfortunate of shaykh to have left out the whole sentence from the book of imam ibn qudamah hambali RH. He quoted half of the sentence and ledt out the other half where he clearly meant the meaning known to us is not attributed to Allah. The whole context of his discussion was that meaning is known to us in language but the same meaning cannot be given when it comes to Allah swt, infact in one place he mentioned no one knows Arabic language more than our Nabi sallallahu alaihi wasallam, so if we consign one meaning to these sifaat then how can we say that's the correct meaning of this sifaat and not the other.
9:41
"Without how"
"Without giving it a meaning"
Isn't this Tafweed Al-Ma'na?
Yeah, exactly shaykh doesn't know what he is saying.. Because the statement clearly prove tafwid al mana...
You didn't clear anything. Especially with the statement of Imam Ahmad cuz you only used salafi scholars for its explanation
Bi la kayf- without a how. "HOW" doesn't apply to Allah ta'ala nor His Attributes reasons being: "kayfiyyah (how or modality)" by clear definition even in the arabic language relates to: an incident, an event, experence, expression, system, method, jawhar (particle), arad (attribute of a particle), or a jism (body) which is made up of a jawhar and arad and which has shape, form, depth, width, & length. All of those things are specific to creation & indicate that "HOW" only relates to created things. Allah ta 'ala is totally clear from those created things. Therefore "HOW" do not apply to Allah. To say we don't know "HOW" when it relates to Allah ta'ala or His Attributes is to affirm a "HOW" which is ilhad (blasphemy). Case close on this matter.
In his book "Daf'ou Choubahi t-Tachbîh" Imam Ibnou Al-Jawzi H597 al-Hanbali reports the creed of Ahmad ibn Hanbal :
« كان أحمد - يعني الإمام أحمد بن حنبل - لا يقول بالجهة للباري »
"Ahmad (i.e. Imam Ahmad Ibnu Hanbal) never assigned direction to Al-Bârî (The Creator: i.e. Allah) "
- The Imam, the Hâfidh (specialist in the chains of transmission of the hadîth), the Mufassir (exegete) Abdou r-Rahmân Ibnou 'Ali known under the name of Ibnou l-Jawzi the Hanbalite, was born in 508 in Baghdâd and died in 597 of the Hegira in Baghdâd (رحمه الله) that is to say 835 years ago.
well his student Sheikh Al Islam Ibn Qudama disagrees. You must affirm for Allah the direction of Highness. Thats also what Sheikhul Islam Abdul Qadir al Jilani said.
The mute butcher, points to the sky as he cannot say bismillah when killing the animal. This is the fatawa of the hanbali school and amongst ahlul ilm.
This is based on the hadith of the prophet s.a.w, in which he asked the girl where is Allah and she point to the sky.
Take from this what you will.
Masha Allah, Jazak Allah khair
Asha'ari & Maturidi aqeedah is misguidance and salaf is Haq and Truth
but shaykh what is the meaning of hand (yed) then?
ruclips.net/p/PLExCKwROz20Fx-CU6VpfWMKC5vEluvJ3R
You don't define the word "يد" by the dictionary as the heretics (asharis and their likes) force you to do since defining them by the dictionaries dwells into the kay'fiyyah which is what the salaf said not to indulge in and neither do dictionaries even define words by the apparent, in fact it's the opposite they do it by its denotative characteristics.
So to define the apparent, we define يد by its function, due to trying to define it in line with dictionaries is incorrect as they use the denotative meaning which dwells into the kay'fiyyah.
Like i keep mentioning, trying to define the sifat in line with dictionaries is faulty because they focus on particulars and a denotative meaning. Which again dwells into the kay'fiyyah; which is rejected (having knowledge of)
There are types of definitions in the Arabic language: al-Rasm and al-Hadd, explaining by the rasm definition is what we do as the hadd [definition] dwells into the kay'fiyyah.
So don't be forced by ahlul-bid'ah to define it by the dictionary.
Its meaning would be "it is an eternal attribute established in Allah’s essence, by which He creates with (created Adam with both Hands, created the qalam, the Arsh, wrote the torah as mentioned by the hadith and etc.), he grips and folds with (surah Zumar: 37) and so on."
The literal meaning of hand is a body part
@@ihsanmahmood8789 this is what most jahmis use right?
@@MrJuniornl
Then Muqatilah said Hand is body part.
He did Tafweedh ul Ma’na الحمد لله
First
Allah has a Leg and Two hands on the right side. Don't ask how bruddddddddders.
*Sayyiduna Ibn Qudamah, QadasAllahu sirruhu was a qadiri sufi, so was Sayyiduna ibn Tayymiyah, qadasAllahu sirruhu.*
the question is wrong, tafwid al-ma'na wa kayfiyyah or tafwid wa kafiyyah faqat
It should be tafweed al manawiyy, not tafweed al manawiyya تفويض المعنى او التفويض المعنوى (arabic correction)
JazakAllahu Khayr for bringing a legitimate Hanbali work from a legitimate Hanbali Murji. But Ustad with all due respect, Ibn Qudama did not go around bashing the position of the rest of the Ummah, he gave the Hanbali position and left it be. Just because, Imam Hanbal said it, doesn't mean it is Hujjah. This debate will never end and the learned have learned to live with differences of opinion. Asharis are the majority of the Ummah and they have the overwhelming majority of the scholars and the Mujtahids. No, the majority is not in error according to the riwayah mutawatirah attributed to Prophet. For Asharis and Maturidis Allah simply does not have a hand, feet, shin or face (glory be to him far is he removed from human similarities and attributes) plain and simple - it is majaz. They are linguistic metaphorical expressions well known in the Arabic language that you claim to know so much.
This topic has been a huge source of fitnah for people coming after the hanbali madhab on twitter also. Especially after Imam Ahmad RA
*Allah existed before time and space, He existed the same before as He is now, and it is incorrect to say He is inside, or outside a space, or any of the 6 directions giving Him likeness to His Creation, there is nothing like Him.*
Boycott French products
This guy is doing tahreef if Ibn Qudama’s words.
Exactly...he is literalist and pseudosalafi and trying to preach ideology of wahabbiya....like anthropomorphism
@@muhammadumaralhanbali I agree
Istawa is known means the statement is known to people because the Quran states it, the kayf /how/modality is inapplicable for Allah this is what Imaam Malik meant , this is typical of wahabi/salafis to confuse what is clear these are people whose knowledge supersedes their intelligence.
This guy obviously has not studied from the Hanaabila. The mutamad books of the Hanaabila do not carry this interpretation.
The word is known the meaning is left with Allah ta'ala. There is a meaning that Allah ta’ala knows. Stop your misguided belief. None of the Scholars of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jama'ah had that understanding you hold that is the understanding of the Wahhabis. Taqwa Allah. Give your isnad of that understanding of that text.
4:16
you're just proving the point of asharis,and please stop bringing shaykh uthaymeen and other of our generation in explaining the mutuun.
It isnt Right to bring contemporary scholars to Proof a Point in aqeeda because it can always be Said that we dont accept them as ashaira for Proofing a Point. Rather it Should be Argued with Classical scholars from the past we both accept to Show that manaa Here means manaa kayfiyya.
@Quran and Sunnah i am not ashari by the way i am athari Sunni in my Creed. I meant by „we“ in the eyes of an ashari so calm down
*when Sayyiduna Umar RadhiAllahu anhu was asked about istiwa, he hit the person with a stick, until his head was bloody, the person after asking a few questions, said he understands now(there is no istiwa for Allah in a meaning of the Creation, having a space and time).*
Who you studied the matn with give your isnad & ijazah of the riwayah (narration) & diraayah (explanation). I guarantee it lead to Wahhaabis or Pseudo Salafis & not Ulama of Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jama'ah. Taqwa Allah! You would judge for your misguidance.
ruclips.net/video/qgnWwf7BPoc/видео.htmlsi=SngFj6QDLbSsBDYN
*The real version of your title...*
Ibn Taimiyya nor Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah and their Wahhabi and "Salafi" subscribers in later times belong to the true Salaf al-Saliheen or to their school of thought..
They don't represent the 'Aqeedah of Ahl al-Haqq/ " The People of Truth"..
The term denotes Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jama'ah as opposed to the sects and is identical with "The Saved Group" ( al-firqat al-naajiya) mentioned in the Hadith of the Prophet Sallallaahu alayhi wa ala aalihi wa sahbihi wa sallam..
Ahl Sunnah wal Jama'ah consist of 3 groups: the textualist ( al-Athariyya), whose Imam is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal: the Ash'aris whose Imam is Abu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari: and the Maturidis, whose Imam is Abu Mansur al-Maaturiedi..
They are all one sect , the saved sect, and they are Ahl al-Hadith..
( al-Saffarienie)
Anyone that deviates from this meaning is an innovator..
Ahl Sunnah wal Jama'ah: " People of the Way of the Prophet and the Congregation of Muslims, also known as Sunni Muslims..
Have some respect for Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Al Qayim
*Ibn Tayymiyah qadasAllahu sirruhu is buried between the Awliyaullah, alayhimur Ridwan in Damascus.*
*He is buried as a sufi saint, Rahmatullahi alayhi, all of them are alive in their graves(asking people like them, who are alive in their graves, for help is Sunnah, like Shuhada, awliyaullah, and prophets, alejhimus Salatu wa Salaam).*
What Nonsense i guess you have smoked enough weed for the day😁