Friedrich Nietzsche on Feminism and Equality.

[@DamaniJones]

Aaaaaand he predicted the future like a boss.

[@thenarrator1984]

The past is the future

[@misspollysdolly]

@@thenarrator1984 guess all you incels have someone to look up to

[@Dutch_bastard_23]

"the perfect woman is a higher type of humanity than the perfect man"
He stole this from Arthur Schopenhauer (who also hated f*minism) who also said that a woman will "grow further" if she sets herself free from society, precisely because woman IS the more social of the species, therefore it requires more effort and could produce a stronger being.

[@limitless1692]

WOW
He was light years ahead of his time ...

[@420KUSHWIN]

No, not ahead, he was right on it, it's been known since ancient times. Cavemen knew best that we where not equal.

[@mashable8759]

Damn. He foresaw Feminist movement

[@combatantezoteric2965]

It is estimated that in the west male inceldom is at a sky high 40%. And it will only become worse as women become more and more entitled to richer, more powerful and more goodlooking men.

[@orangetoes223]

hes preaching the opposite of modern feminism

[@arthurgross6269]

@@mashable8759 He didn't really foresee anything... He was born in 1844, just 4 years before the formal beginning of feminism at Seneca Falls 1848. So it was very much relevant and existing during his time.

[@combatantezoteric2965]

"there cannot be pace between man and woman because the war between them is eternal" - beautifuly said

[@mashable8759]

He foresaw the Feminist movement

[@arthurgross6269]

He didn't really foresee anything... He was born in 1844, just 4 years before the formal beginning of feminism at Seneca Falls 1848. So it was very much relevant and existing during his time.

[@summer20105707]

I may try reading Nietzche. He seems to make sense.

[@gubourn]

good luck haha

[@lloydharley9297]

ahahaha i second this

[@khr957]

It’s easier to walk on water 🙂

[@hatrack5977]

The older you grow the more it will make sense.

[@majed5472]

Most of this stuff is from the Story of Philosophy by Will Durrent. At Friedrich Nietzsche, the Chapter of Aristocracy.
the beginning of this video ithough, is from one of Will Durrent qoutes (that's what I found online.

[@gubourn]

absolute legend, had his ear to the ground his whole life

[@lucabaar1]

Honesty & Innovation are luxuries of celibacy... That is how you speak the concise truth

[@bradwalton3977]

I was delighted by his comment about Ibsen. I have had the same opinion of Ibsen for years.

[@sangsb2726]

This is music to my ears.

[@Grargsnir]

I'd be a rotting corpse before I'm equal to anyone or anything.

[@DrSpooglemon]

You'll be just another skull on the heap when the revolution is done with you...

[@boka3751]

@@DrSpooglemon What revolution do you mean?

[@DrSpooglemon]

@@boka3751 I have no idea what year ago me was thinking when he wrote that. Probably some super meta joke that would have been hilarious if anyone could figure out the angle.

[@boka3751]

@@DrSpooglemon Yes i tried

[@whenpigsfly8178]

@@boka3751 The socialist one, the leftist one.. duh and yes, true equality is found in death.

[@VotePaineJefferson]

Based

[@victorcamposs1]

whould be great if could put a list of works and aphorisms that were quoted.

[@ht6771]

Relevant than ever in 2020.

[@ManPursueExcellence]

A dangerous toy. So f****** true 😂

[@comradecommissar311]

Why would anyone want to be equal? We all have different potentials and they are endless. Equality is the same as oppression.

[@dragushcobaj4121]

The worst form of inequality is making unequal things equal.

[@carri102]

The hell are u talking about😭

[@mode4148]

Fact

[@oskarakaable]

spoken like someone who died hundreds of years ago

[@nicholasmaxwell9899]

U mad

[@oskarakaable]

@@nicholasmaxwell9899 came back to this comment 3 years later just to tell you how mad i am

[@stevemakinson2222]

This is now regarded as far right extremism,but the obvious question has to be why?It sounds like very common sense doesn't it?

[@BlaBla-jj6sh]

It is seen as 'far right extremism' precisely because it it common sense. Cultural marxists cannot see the world for what it truly is, or how it truly functions because it doesn't suit their narrative. Just like women are unhappy when they're finally equal to men, socialists will still not be content when there is economic equality. This is not how human nature works and why communism failed.

[@mahe4]

@@BlaBla-jj6sh communism didn't fail because equality was achieved.
but you are still right.

[@StoicSurvivor99]

@Honest Citizen the ones with the strongest wills. The race who are strong as warriors and with the highest IQ. The Egyptians, the japanese, the Scandinavians, the medieval Caucasian nobles and kings. The Romans who have a mix of darker and light skin. You may think im racist for saying this but only the strongest breed of humans are the masters. Good and evil is irrelevant.those with the will to dominate their environment are; thereby, the ones that are empowering their species.

[@Lightnings]

Wise words.

[@statepotcovaru7208]

"The woman will not have the gift of beauty without having the second role instinct"
F.W. Nietzsche

[@Axton476]

Does anyone know what this excerpt is from?

[@johanjoensen7080]

Hunter Axton Also sprach Zarathustra

[@derwandschauer]

It's from different books.

[@majed5472]

Most of this stuff is from the Story of Philosophy by Will Durrent. At Friedrich Nietzsche, the Chapter of Aristocracy.
the beginning of this video ithough, is from one of Will Durrent qoutes (that's what I found online.

[@theoraciasilva9236]

Story of civilization audiobook, available on RUclips

[@ericlegge2884]

From Nietzsche's autobiography called "Ecce Homo" (Behold the Man).

[@mahfuzannan8270]

Have woke leftists cancelled him?

[@zacharypayne4080]

I have listened to this probably 6 time's

[@tiborkeser74]

Inventor of the red pill

[@wonder7798]

Manly, we don't have to be manly to accomplish our own survival.

[@emilyh6926]

If honesty and innovation are the luxuries of [being single], I'm staying single. I've already learned in childhood how the lack of honesty lead to the suffocation and anguish of the heart soul.
If I based my approach to gender on this philosophy, I'd most certainly become transgender. (even if it means missing out on fashion and shopping! Lol)

[@zeitgeist2point087]

Emily H Well in the end for him he actually wanted to be with a woman, because without someone to share your ideas with philosophy is worthless.

[@orangetoes223]

take a second look at that dumbfucks moustache and change your mind bitch

[@chill3282]

zeitgeist2point0
Pretty sure he shared his ideas with the world. He is one the most famous philosophers ever

[@analienfromouterspace]

Know your abilities in nature, then work on it, stop trying to be what you can't to be. Problem is, women needs heroes, heroes dies. In today world, there are few heroes, or heroes haven't been recognized for their hard work. Instead, we are shaming and crucifying those who simply trying living for nature standards. Therefore, society is now creating standards can not be reached by most and alluding others with illusion of control until their generations is no more.
If you are born woman, act as such. If you are born man, act as such. There are exceptions for those born neither due to side effect of evolution. Right now, we are wasting time.

[@jyotiradityaguleria907]

Holy fuck, he was right

[@paulsolon6229]

Language

[@3cabbyy632]

Does anyone know which book this quote 3:40 from?

[@nehaljoe8885]

The story of philosophy by Will Durant. Pg: 565

[@carolmiles2351]

A real Dead Beat Dad like a menace to society.....☎️🎥👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍😱🥱🤬😡😠🤐🌚👽💩🤓🤠🤖

[@behzadasgharpour661]

.........myth never dies....rip .....master

[@majed5472]

Most of this stuff is from the Story of Philosophy by Will Durrent. At Friedrich Nietzsche, the Chapter of Aristocracy.
the beginning of this video ithough, is from one of Will Durrent qoutes (that's what I found online.

[@josephboharon9343]

Well done

[@xpallodoc]

Whoa a vid

[@lukedevlin45]

We might not be equal in skills and qualities, but we are all human. We are all trying to deduce the workings of meaning - whether male or female; and that makes us equal animals. Everyone is free to philosophize, surely that makes us equal?

[@StoicSurvivor99]

Knowing we are human does not mean we are equal. Just because a lion and a leopard are predatory cats doesn't mean they are equal. A lion will always dominate the leopard because it has a biological advantage in strength, regardless if the leopard can kill and climb trees. The last part of your sentence is misplaced. Having different skills and qualities means we....are...not....EQUAL!

[@mashable8759]

No we are not

[@erzablack1080]

@@StoicSurvivor99 lion ,tiger,elephant,wolf.....ect are superieur to human in physical strength but does that mean that they are superior to human? No....human is not like other animals human is a rational being his only and real strength that made him above all other animals is his mind.....thus no matter what a human sex skin color or race....having a mind that work means that you are a human

[@anmolpatel793]

@@erzablack1080 the mind of a man is not the same as the mind of a woman even biologically

[@erzablack1080]

@@anmolpatel793 even if it doesn't exactly work the same ...but woman and men both have intelligence, and that's the only thing that matters because in the end of the day each person not just each sex has a unique mind of his,besides that in life a lot of things matters like people thoughts , things which can handicap and prevent person from achieving what he really can achieve.....for example there's searches that claim that black people had lower genetic intelligence....but there's a lot of smart black people so they can't be called exciptions but if a black personne believes that claim here it's the probleme he will prevent himself from exploiting his intelligence and achieving great things...so I believe in the end if a human has a mind that's works correctly, then all is needed is to feed it with knowledge .

[@Kod0x1]

Source ?

[@ericlegge2884]

From Nietzsche's autobiography called "Ecce Homo" (Behold the Man).

[@haidyncovert2363]

Frederich Neightche is always to be taken with a grain of salt. He was one of the greatest thinkers of his time and I've studied his work for years now and all the things he said should be considered. However this world is not fully comprehensible to one man. Inside every human is a soul deserving sovereignty. Modern diversity fails because of a lack of a common goal, not from a mixture of classes and races. I do agree that for most women child bearing will provide them with the most purpose in life however I know this is not the case for many women, therefore all women need the autonomy to choose their path and the same goes for men.

[@MyAnnusMirabilis]

"Inside every human is a soul deserving sovereignty." There is no such thing as a soul. Thats not even biblical. Your premise is faulty.
"Modern diversity fails because of a lack of a common goal, not from a mixture of classes and races."
How can you HAVE a common goal if everybody is equal yet people are tribal by nature? What would the common goal even be?
"however I know this is not the case for many women, therefore all women need the autonomy to choose their path and the same goes for men"
yeah we see how well that works out, do you believe that women should be virgins before marriage?

[@josephpercy1558]

"Soul" as such is equivalent with the way of "Being in the world," as Heidegger puts it. And Nietzsche would agree. Mixtures of classes and races are integral _within_ ways of being in the world process. You claim to have studied his work for years. I'll have to take that with a grain of salt, for you fail to see past your own ears to be much of a philosopher.

[@Knaeben]

Is there a reference???

[@ericlegge2884]

From Nietzsche's autobiography called "Ecce Homo" (Behold the Man).

[@th3pankake]

Why u no give references??

[@ericlegge2884]

From Nietzsche's autobiography called "Ecce Homo" (Behold the Man).

[@arete7884]

Philosophers are a great source of knowledge but they lack true wisdom of the enlightened masters , its talking without walking the path and making it to the end tho i do believe he reached that stage eventually

[@josephpercy1558]

They "lack true wisdom?" Au contraire, are you aware of what the term _philosophia_ actually means? I'll answer it for you: the love of Wisdom. And who are these "enlightened masters" you speak of so fondly? Self-improvement gurus?

[@InsanitysApex]

Enlightenment is well-balanced bullshit. To remain in perfect equilibrium for centuries, even millennia, without changing or accomplishing anything; that is true -enlightenment- bullshit.
And the people do love eating enlightenment.

[@krunkle5136]

From which book?

[@ericlegge2884]

From Nietzsche's autobiography called "Ecce Homo" (Behold the Man).

[@waltercomplojer329]

dang

[@ZooDinghy]

Explains a lot. That's why he became the first incel and stayed single throughout his entire life.

[@ajedrezbrasil7968]

He was not an incel because he was voluntarily celibate.

[@ZooDinghy]

@@ajedrezbrasil7968 "Lol," Lou Salome said.

[@lilpp4791]

Every man who dares to criticize women is an incel ha you dumbass, ironically weak man that worship women are the incels

[@ZooDinghy]

​@@lilpp4791 Nietzsche was an involuntary celibate, except when he had sex with prostitutes (which eventually got him syphilis). He proposed to Lou Salome by SENDING his friend Paul Ree - who also had a crush on her. Salome, on the other hand, thought that he was a bit strange. I suggest reading some of his biographies.

[@ZooDinghy]

@WhiteNationalist Portugal Bison No, because of his involuntary celibacy.

[@helentracy1402]

Nietzsche proposed to the same woman 3 times. After her 3rd rejection he became depressed and thought the only reason a woman could reject him is if they were all evil.

[@but_iWantedTo_speakGerman]

No bish. You just proved his point. Grow the eff up, cat lady.

[@josephpercy1558]

What utter bullocks. That was not his reasoning whatsoever. I shouldn't expect you to relate, seeing that your first name is "Helen."

[@nikjojo]

i think i mistakely watched an incel video and now this video is recommended to me.
my recommendations are messed up

[@roseskyeohmy]

same like wtf is this

[@Chiefrocka.]

​@@roseskyeohmy truth

[@littlemothbigwings6765]

Not everyone is perfect

[@markmerzweiler909]

I might take this seriously if he had ever had a successful relationship.

[@andrehof7876]

hahaha that is totally out of context or sense....NO Nietzsche was not at all succesfull in relationships for that matter.

[@markmerzweiler909]

@THEMAXIMUMPOWER Why bother living at all if it isn't without love?

[@nicolasarriaza7614]

​@@markmerzweiler909 the more you seek women for women's sake the further your life will become impoverished and you will be left with a need that can never be fulfilled, which will lead to self hatred for not feeling adequate enough to attract them. If you focus on cultivating yourself and accomplish your life goals instead, a woman, or many if you wish, will find its way towards you without you having to look for her.

[@markmerzweiler909]

@Supreme Ace This is about to ugly...so, let's just let it alone.

[@markmerzweiler909]

@THEMAXIMUMPOWER My original comment on Nietzsche was half joking and half serious. Friedrich was a brilliant miserable soul - I would never take lifestyle advice from a man like him. Don't get me wrong...he was a genius thinker, but lived a lonely sad life. Wjy would I take advice from a guy who was ditched by the only women he loved - and I promise you if she accepted him...his views would have much different. So, pardon me if I stand by my original comment.

[@Konaustin113]

And angry incels begin quoting specific parts of this in 3...2....1

[@Xremote]

Nietzsche speaks truth on a lot of issues but if we see further than our heroes it's because we recognize the failures in their works.

[@Xremote]

@gamesandguitars003, if you think women in general actually have equal rights in practice, you're only fooling yourself. Obviously they have more rights then they did during Nietzsche time. I can see it in how my boss treats my female co-worker. I seen it when I was in the military, I see it with one of my female co-workers who is a hell of a lot smarter than I am but makes less money than I do.
We tend to be blind to the things that don't really affect us as individuals. That was a lesson I learned long ago, and one you would do well to remember.

[@Xremote]

It's true that he said it oh, he is also incorrect.

[@Xremote]

@@lilpp4791 to misquote John Adams, human nature know thyself!

[@alpaci4600]

@@Xremote Stop trying to be a whiteknight and have some dignity. "muh wimminz get mistreated by my boss" doesn't mean women lack rights. Being equal to men means you have to endure pain and humiliation without crying for the government to step in unless something illegal happens. That's what men learn to do ever since they're kids, especially in the schoolyard. Women live comfortable lives for the most part and some of them play the helpless victim when they experience something uncomfortable that isn't even illegal.
The gender pay gap is falsehood. It's been refuted over and over again. You're clearly lying for claiming your mythical female worker doesn't get paid as much. If anything it's the opposite. Women get promoted just by sucking off their male supervisor/boss. Either way, it's illegal to not pay women the same wage for the same job a man does in the US.

[@alexdelarge195]

And all because Lou Salome rejected him three times

[@ht6771]

No. All because he was a philosopher.

[@LukeofSmeg]

I love Nietzche, read loads of him years back but he can chat some utter shit at times. xD
The obsession over sex here is just absurd, just live and let live ffs!
There is no true manly man or womanly woman, and even if their could be how insecure would you have to be to care anyway?
Gender isn't some competition.
Such a conflicted man Nietzche, one minute immense reason, the next; conflicted at times, contradictory, bigoted drivel.
The self destructive pressure he must have been putting on himself must have been horrible at times, and he knew it!
Sad to see him so often taken out of context but such is the way of the world!

[@soumyadipgoswami1721]

I
blame your university education for your poor and utterly uninformed opinions . who do you think is responsible ?

[@InsanitysApex]

Found the womanly man XD

[@LukeofSmeg]

@@InsanitysApex Thanks for proving my point. 😂 Got to say it's at least better than the guy who first replied who thought calling some random person an academic and university educated (which I'm actually not lmfao) was an insult.
Although calling someone a womany man after they point out that's a really insecure thing to do is pretty funny aswell.
B+ for effort 😂

[@InsanitysApex]

@wellardgerrard "Subject dismisses all rationality in favor of feminine passive aggression. -He- She has taken a liking to fictional drama and assumes victory rather than stating clear arguments against a world-renowned philosopher (who was one of the first socially accepted pseudo-psychoanalysts (And Jung ("the" psychoanalyst) well established the Anima-Animus)). And rejects the clear psychosocial-sexual unrest in society (which can be solved by integrating said Anima-Animus). And subject believes projecting said Anima-Animus problem (his self-righteously declared "victory"/peace) out onto society/other (instead of taking psychological responsibility for anima-animus within) is a viable solution."
"But unconscious psychoanalysis is insanity. And the unconscious anima-animus can not be solved socially/culturally/unconsciously until done individually/consciously to some degree, and is articulated/integrated by species. So since the subject would prefer to project psychological responsibility for inner unconscious sexual dynamics onto society ("proving" one's one sanity/incompetence in short-term, but driving species level schizanthroposia (split-human-illness)(man v woman split)), we have no choice but to assume the he-shemale subject is a psychologically irresponsible sheeple hiding in the herd, and continuing "humanity's" problem of the 2 billion year old sexual reproduction divergence of male vs female."
"Subject is clearly somewhat aligned with feminine axis (Chaos v Harmony) prioritizing instilling Chaos in others, while deluding oneself that his-her own psyche is also aligned by masculinity (Determined v Undetermined). Which is nigh impossible, given current state of psychosocial-sexual landscape, combined with subjects obvious adherence to most popular/rudimentary ideologies, which are oblivious to nearly all aforementioned materials, as well as their unconscious, as well as any form of psychological responsibility."
"Prognosis- Subjects unconscious is chaotic and undetermined, and rejects harmony while projecting chaos onto others (resentful anima), recovery also nigh impossible with current state of patients psychological stability, immaturity, lack of responsibility, and rejection of reality."
"Diagnosis- Subject is a basic b!tch. Recommend 100cc's of this fat truth-cock 'cross her hero-ego-wife (burrowed-home-hole for hidden/narcissistic consciousness, exploring mind= vewy scawy). Back in the herd with the other cows n' sows! You're useless as a man, go be whatever it is you believe you are, twink."
You're right though, "gender isn't some competition"; gender is made up nonsense by insecure losers.
Sex is a 2-billion-year-old cutthroat war; in nature females eat males after sex, males infanticide offspring of other males, males r*pe females, and use traumatic (abdominal) insemination, females enslave males with hormones etc.
You don't know what you're talking about; but your self-righteous, guru (peace, love, and let live as each "believes") bit is really gracious of you.
Reciprocity Grade = S+ for stepping off your soapbox to inform humanity of your superior ethics (all ethics are evolved, mother nature wants, designed, and created the war of the sexes, competition breeds excellence, universal acceptance results in.... you). If you want to beat her war you must know the land, laws, and lies (like the one's you're drowning in). Humanity is schizanthroposic with any split it can get its hands on, especially with sex aka "psycho-schizogenesis". (also S+ for competition and defiance, most crumble)
You can project empty victory, but it only results in your unconscious anima-animus eating into the autonomy of, and diluting the freewill of, your consciousness and conscious will (narcissism on rise as we exit "age of Machiavellians" and enter "age of narcissists", conformists, "sanity"-junkies, anxious/afraid etc. all accept that "sacrifice" and conform to herd/unconscious. Hence their psyche's remain mostly deterministically-locked to the unconscious-socialization marketplace of the species).
Humanity's psycho-schizogenesis is largely unresolved on the global level, and intensifying as more people have more free time to solve more problems that Man's (and woman's) hubris assumed we knew. We're not even close. And the more you project/avoid it the worse you make it (for everyone else, I can psychologically/socially/emotionally/ethically etc. reverse engineer the species, in case you hadn't noticed). Good luck in your continued victories at declaring peace (mother nature always knows, she's inside you 😉and believe me, she ain't leaving willingly without a seriously psychotic "eviction notice" of psycho-extinction level proportions, you're better off just integrating your anima. Or following the other cattle where they lazily graze).
TLDR; Doesn't matter if you went to university, or were the sum total of all modern academic sexual philosophy, psychology, and psychiatry...
I'd inevitably vex your restless sexual perplexions @bewilderedhildegard

[@LukeofSmeg]

@@InsanitysApex Hilarious. 😂😂 What an absolute wet wipe! Waffling about reverse engineering the species? You're absolutely barmey mate. 😂
For real though, and for your own sake, what do you honestly think drove you to reply like that?
Even if it's just for the lols (despite the fact that's now out the window) what was that even about?
Have you even taken a second to think why you felt an urge to just randomly insult people on the internet?
Your natural reaction to my comment was like I'd taken your manhood from you.
If your natural reaction to the idea that strong independent women are a threat, that says infinitely more about you than it does them.
Like you've clearly got some pent up issues (as proven by the length and absolute shit you were just chatting). Bro, if you need to vent something go right ahead, call me whatever you want man, but please for your own sake think about how silly your position makes you look: You think calling someone a womanly man is an insult, why? If I were a womanly man, why the fuck should I care let alone you?
And surely the fact you are so offended by it shows the very characteristics of said womanly man in the first place. Which can only lead me to assume you're only saying this because your projecting your own insecurities onto someone else. As a straight bloke, not once have I felt offended or emasculated by women using rights they should have had centuries ago.
This is 100% a you problem. I know that's not what you want to hear, but look back at what you wrote and just try (for your own sake) to see how silly what you're talking about is. It comes across as being really insecure, it's like Joe Rogan pumping himself with testosterone to make himself "more of a man" (which just think about it, can only realistically be an insecure position) yet he gets offended by trans people doing exactly the same thing. Sure he might tell you he's not insecure, but we can all see it from his actions, just as people can see it in your replies now, it's embarrassing, and cringe as fuck. I genuinely can't reiterate enough how unhealthy the way you are thinking is. It's pitiful really.

[@bakunin888]

great man theory is for children looking for a daddy

[@rinabhattacharjee174]

The tyrant insanity of impotence thus crieth out of you

[@pieckberry1229]

I, too, would say shit like this if I looked like that. Man is sooo mad oh my god

[@Chiefrocka.]

Stay mad

[@pieckberry1229]

@@Chiefrocka. someone's bitter

[@Chiefrocka.]

@@pieckberry1229 yea you sound like bitter from what you have heard In the video

[@fuwa9616]

@@pieckberry1229 No one is bitter, men decide what power women have. After all, what is stopping me from punishing you? Another man. Never a woman.

[@manuam98]

What a boomer

[@manuam98]

@@but_iWantedTo_speakGerman yeah

[@manuam98]

@@but_iWantedTo_speakGerman Hey thanks a lot!!

[@but_iWantedTo_speakGerman]

@@manuam98 i'm Koko Disco.. accept lol

[@FreddySimmon-c4b]

Nah boomers were yesterday's liberals who think they are conservatives. Ignorance is bliss and this bliss is common in yesterday's boomer parents who are dull in there understanding of w0men. This is why the young men are blamed for not attraction of w0men because parents are dumbed down by gynocentric dogma

[@taykenobi7332]

I love nietzsche, lot of good insights. but wtf is this pile of hot garbage? Lol

[@taykenobi7332]

@Pablo Asrin lol what? I stated my opinion. I'll rephrase more clearly, Yeah sure he's written alot of other great work, but this is the weakest writing I've seen from him.

[@awad7391]

@@taykenobi7332 have you dated a modern woman? I live in Quebec, a very left leaning society, and these things are much more pronounced here

[@chaoslimits]

@@taykenobi7332 only because you disagree.

[@taykenobi7332]

@@chaoslimits yeah. I disagree. This critique is weak as hell.

[@but_iWantedTo_speakGerman]

@@taykenobi7332 you’re literally proving Nietzsche’s point.

[@Povilas69]

Based