The Slater Designs Sci-Fi 2.0 in I-Bolic Technology - Daniel 'Tomo' Thomson's update to the original

Press: bit.ly/42LJOY5 for the Sci-Fi 2.0.
A re-release of the classic Sci-Fi designed by Daniel 'Tomo' Thomson in collaboration with Kelly Slater, newly updated in I-Bolic Technology from Slater Designs.
Tomo says, "the Sci-Fi has been such a popular design and stood the test of time because of its functionality. It's such an easy board to ride. It gives the user an effortless sense of control and performance that you wouldn't get in a traditional shortboard."
Capturing the essence of Daniel's Modern Planing Hull innovations over the prior decade, the Sci-Fi 2.0 can handle and hold in significantly sized waves up to double overhead, but it still grovels with ease of speed in flat faced waves under waist high.
Much of the magic in the Sci-FI 2.0 comes from Daniel's innovative approach to tail design and concave configuration, as the Sci-Fi 2.0 combines his original Double Bat Tail concept and his Quad Inside Single Concave.
The result is a board that controls speed uncommonly well for how wide its tail is, making the Sci-Fi 2.0 in I-Bolic Technology a quiver enhancement to anyone's board rack.

[@DeforestLCooper]

So rad! Can't wait to try that tech in that model.
Too many board, not enough time to ride them all. lol.

[@rodneyevans4876]

good to see tomo healthy again and surfing good

[@sumatran]

I hope the Ibolic doesn't change the way it rides much, because I love it as it and use it in everything. And, Tomo, Firewire: PLEASE BRING BACK THE EL TOMO FISH!!

[@cheesmonster]

Don’t leave out the big guys either, my 6’4” El Tomo Fish is still my most successful shortboard! Excited to get a SciFi 2.0 to complement it.

[@NCsurfer607]

What does that 5th tiny fin in that quad do for the overall feel of the sci-fi 2.0 ??

[@NCsurfer607]

@@Bob-pv3ge ok wondering how it would go on my Dominator 2.0 ?

[@foxgd9117]

@@NCsurfer607good

[@martinwajda]

I ride the Cymatic, which is similar to the Sci-Fi and after going from FCS to Future fins I find that futures large rear quad fins are much smaller compared to FSC, making a little loose in bigger waves. Once I put in the little fin it was all good again.

[@bonsummers2657]

Solana Beach?

[@eyalpolishook6486]

is it lighter than the old LFT? does it feel heavier on the water than the old one? differences in general?? 🙏

[@medphysio3746]

Ibolic Heavier than LFT. And ibolic can have more footprint than LFT. Ibolic Sink more in the water, LfT yellowed ibolic no. That’s my experience

[@eyalpolishook6486]

i bolic become red...😮

[@peacepuffz]

Eye Bollock Yeeew!

[@wozza77able]

Hey Tomo do you feel like you have halved your market now you don’t make boards with FCS?