OK. But if you have to know A(normal) to compute lVxAl , I don't see how this formula isn't circular? Is there another way to compute A to plug into formula?
@bprpcalculusbasics you needed the k in the definition of A normal to solve for k. So you can't derive k from an independent representation of A or V on the other side of the equation?
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
I will prove the torsion formula soon!
with all due respect you are a mystical calc wizard
Maybe you should tag these videos as calc 3 so folks know going in
OK. But if you have to know A(normal) to compute lVxAl , I don't see how this formula isn't circular? Is there another way to compute A to plug into formula?
What made you think the formula is circular?
@bprpcalculusbasics you needed the k in the definition of A normal to solve for k. So you can't derive k from an independent representation of A or V on the other side of the equation?
This video might help ruclips.net/video/LB4SVSWvLXk/видео.htmlsi=embRRtmQkmMX8z4o
Good explanation 👍👍👍.
I like being out of college and looking at the finnesse and flow of it all.
didnt understand anything but hoping to do so just like i did with calculus
Niha what is it ?