Sunak’s Rwanda failure: experts tear up decision to delay Rwanda flights to after the election
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 май 2024
- “I shudder to think what the situation is going to be in the UK. We’re going to be looking at 40, 50 thousand refugees this year”, says Kevin Saunders.
“It’s an admission of reality” says Matt Dathan, home affairs editor at the Times
Rishi Sunak has announced that no Rwanda flights will take off before the general election. Experts analyse his decision.
📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.co.uk/radio
📍 Subscribe to our channel - / @listentotimesradio
🗞 Subscribe to The Times www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/...
📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-...
The Rwanda flights were never going to take off
The idea is to stop illegal immigrants from risking £3000 paying traffickers knowing they could be sent to Rwanda
@@colinfryett8174 No, the idea is to flood the UK with Africans and Asians, more than ever before….
Who made the most money out of the illegal immigration
A)Ruwanda Govt
B)French Govt
C)People Smugglers
D)Serco
Yes Serco
Starmers cronies human rights lawyers are making millions out of illegal migrants starmer want stop immigration just the opposite.
Starmer cronies human rights lawyers are making millions out of illegal migrants he voted 130 times against policies to stop illegal migrants.
This man is delusional, Rwanda was never intended to work.
True, it was just the dead cat Borris launched onto the table to deflect attention. It's not a deterrent, why would any human trafficker care what happens to them? It's vastly expensive, so costing everyone far more than just letting everyone stay. It's illegal. It's just an insane idea. Sunak didn't want it to begin with, does anyone now? Perhaps just Sue Ellen Braverman.
@@AndrewLakeUKwell said he can’t even answer simple questions about it from journalists even after 1 year of advertising and trying to sell us this brilliant idea, he has no clue if they will get shipped on RAF planes or civilian flights or private charter planes😂😂😂 I mean you would think planning to send people to Rwanda you should at least know how you intend on flying them there, 😂😂😂😂
The flights never took off but our money did .
"Sunak The Failure!" - how history will (reluctantly, if at all) remember him.
Who?
Absurd comment.
Sunak and Boris wasted tax payers money.
Decoy ploy was never designed to come into effect!
He s etching his bets! The Rwanda flights will not happen! He is telling lies! He needs to go!
Hedging.
He is going. The problem is Labour will just open the floodgates even further.
@@jimthompson9370 citation needed
@@jimthompson9370 it will all be a waste of money that the government have paid for rwanda
@@AndrewLakeUK thank yiu
They sent ONE person who will probably now sue because he was singled out and say he was forced to go 🙄A 5* hotel, £100 a week free health care and living in England is still better
Didn't deliver did he. All lies, can't trust him....4th July independence for the people.
Kevin Saunders? What is he on? I find it hard to believe that he was ever in a position of responsibility.
I agree with you
Bad omen of Rishi Sunak strikes the flight
He is using Rwanda flight to divert attention from real issues
How is it This man did nothing before when he was not former this and that...?????
Beats me how he got to be in charge of anything.
Why would Rwanda be a deterrent to the smugglers? They wouldn't be sent there, the people they smuggled in would. I dont know that the smugglers care where the people go once they have the money and dropped them off.
Second, don't people on visas work, buy things, and otherwise contribute to the economy?
The smugglers are vast and organised - our government doesn’t want to stop this - ECHR is the answer though the politicians ignore the solution
No. They’re largely economically inactive, are often involved in serious crime and require a lot of social services (housing, medical care etc.) When you consider the cultural and societal impact on our society this needs to stop and those here illegally deported.
If they applied legally they could maybe get a work visa and contribute but they are illegal and work in the illegal economy of the criminal network. They will claim every penny they can either from the Social security system or crime and send it home to fund more illegals.
Not necessarily. Most of them keep under the radar and send money out of the Country back to their homes.
Everyone STILL scratching their head.. why now?? 🙄Here’s your answer: didn’t want to suffer the humiliation of this flop announced for July. C’mon journos WAKE UP!!
Are those pre- paid hundreds of millions refundable?
What the ones the immigration Barristers have charged to keep them in our country
No they just want the money back if you're paid 1p over you're carers allowence 😡
It was never meant to work, just to kick the can down the road a little bit further till the next pretend idea…
This prime minister is way past his pay scale. Needs to go. Dreadful man.
So whats happened to the £400 million he gave them
🕵️🧙🤷🎊🏆🎖️🎉🎈🎇
But if we were only going to send a few hundred to Rwanda then how would it dent the tens of thousands coming across in small boats? It doesn't add up. Then if Rwanda send more of their problem asylum seekers on the return flight than we send to them, which the agreement allows for, what will the public reaction be?
Sunak hasn't stopped the boats as he promised, so what value should we give to any other promises he may make in the next few weeks?
What about our £170 million?
Liar
This down payment of millions of pounds are they refundable!!?? If not, this was a sort of money 💰. British taxpayers need to get their money back ASAP.
Also Human Rights Watch should give a report to where about the people who went to form Afghanistan, Lybia because Rwanda took the money to lift them out of the above mentioned places.
Why after all these unumerable atrocities committed by Rwanda toward his neighbors which are well documented by UN itself , the most civilized nations are the ones violating the human rights sending asylum seekers to an unroofed prison. I hope they will reconsider the case after Sunak departure.
Sunak promised to stop the boats. Now blah blah blah! Sunak the lier
The answer is to stop destabilising and interference in other countries..
What a joke
It’s been a joke for years - no solution on these talk shows as always
I’m currently abroad right now in the Middle East theirs so many refugees here in the country I’m currently at from other African or Middle Eastern countries for the sole purpose of 1 day making it to Europe there’s gangs here that exploit them put 100 people on rubber dingy boats that barely float on the big ocean do you know how much those people pay to be on those boats? They sell all their belongings and save up to get on them it costs around 10,000 dollars for a ticket on them rubber dingys you see get intercepted by European navies off their coast. Those people are so desperate and willing to risk dying in the ocean and sold everything they own do you think the possibility of going to Rwanda is going to stop them? It won’t they are risking the most valuable thing to them their life the possibility of going to Rwanda will not stop them. The boats will also keep moving because those human trafficker gangs will still get paid as-long as people pay to go on those boats
These flights will never take off.ive a very simple solution to a very simple problem,if you really want to stop these boats,all you have to do is just as they come to UK water's,have them stopped,give them 2 choices,first choice is tell them to turn the boat around and go back to france,second choice is,if they refuse to turn the boat around then just pop it and make them swim back to france,then put people on these French beaches and at these camps they stay at handing out flyers stating that all boats will be popped and there will be no rescue once they approach UK water's,sooner or later they will get it and it will stop.like I said,a very simple solution to a very simple problem,it's the only way.and to the people who wants these immigrants here YOU PAY FOR THEM,YOU FEED THEM,YOU HOUSE THEM.lets see how quickly you change your tune
Cost £2 😂
Feckin waist of our money!
Never had a plan that could work & no idea how to solve the problem.
300 asylum seekers a year, one payed £3000 to go, and he's already disappeared. And there's a clurse, the same asylum seeker can't be sent twice from the UK 😂
Audio volume is too low again.
I think Sunak took over from a disgraced party after Liz Truss. He’s a decent man but his team are a shambles.
I would not be surprised to see Starmer offer Britain as the Europeans Rwanda
Rwanda not finished it looks like some EU countries are going to use the scheme.
Defend our boarders properly and you don’t have to send them anywhere apart from backwards.
All individuals that choose a so called career in politics tell big pork pies. They may initially start off with good intentions but they are soon 'tainted' by the environment and the individuals that they have to mix with in the course of their work. Most of them couldn't lie straight in their own beds!
Not surprised at all, kept going as a gimmick to keep the unhappy people hopeful, just same behaviour as Treason May and "Brexit means Brexit" dumb as f**k phrase just to string those along who expected action, all Tossers.
Rwanda never started what a lot of nonsense
Turn the bloody volume up
Nice little earner for Rawanda
Rishi Sunak so botgered about deportation of human beings.
Dont worry about human rights act.
I hope millions more come to Great Britain.
Deploy Navy... ONLY ANSWER....PHYSICALLY STOP ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS !
They're obviously not looking for an answer, are they? It's just theatre: sham democracy in action.
He should do it now, dont wait for the election, and you're get more votes
Was all bs
Why Government couldn’t put a strong law against the illicit immigrants?
Why wasting people’s massive tax money on illegal people, France & Rwanda, … etc??
I don’t think UK is that rich country to give free money to the people or countries that’s nothing to do with the UK?
UK people needs Government support!!
ahh it would've worked so well
Masacr of Tories.Their all policy have failed and PM of UK doesnt have labarotorie results to justify criminal police of UK.Its like clamining flour is sugar.
Starmer = Sharia Law
Reform UK voter alert !
@@johnburrows3385 100% not wasting my vote by voting Reform!! 😂😂
Just because theres an election,it should not stop these deportations, labour want to reverse it,in doing so its handing power back to the courts and ehcr over our elected parliament, that's what was included in that Rwanda bill,the supreme court could no longer interfere with our parliamentary laws,this is not right, we elect these people to pass legislation ,not the courts,who by the way are breaking the law,by interpreting the human rights laws too much.yhey myst ve removed,
You don’t seem to understand how the U.K. works. Parliament makes the laws and the judiciary determines how the laws work. It is specifically the judiciary’s job to determine how laws interact. If the government was serious about it they could have changed the relevant U.K. human rights laws to allow whatever they want and the only challenge would be in the ECHR. They didn’t do that instead they passed a law that might of worked as intended but would certainly have needed to be challenged in U.K. courts. Then before it could be challenged they went for an election.
Someone said this election will be a referendum on small boats.
Rishi Sunak - Stop the boats
Keir Warmer -
Help the boats more like
a WEF puppet or another WEF puppet what a choice.
Exhorbitant street theatre closes
No deterrent is needed.&
Swift processing of applications is needed. The French have offered to allow processing within France.
Safe routes to reach the UK are needed.
Permitting our embassies to issue visas on the basis of local knowledge and ability to discern likely grounds for asylum is needed.
Permitting asylum seeakers to work while awaiting processing decisions is needed.
Will people please understand that most asylum seekers to the UK are here because they speak English or have relatives here. No other reason.
We already have safe routes, a million came last year by legal means!!
@@japfourme381 No. We do not have legal means.
Work visas can be obtained by people with job offers having an annual salary of -£40k. Also core workers, nurses and doctors inevitably come to mind. Ditto students on their second and third degrees, preferably with an option on high salary employment. Neither core workers nor graduate students can bring their spouses and children.
Those routes aside. There is no safe route. If you are a teenager, or younger, who has just lost your family in Gaza, but has relatives in the UK willing to give you a home, you can't get to them. You can't get a visa. You probably don't have any paperwork. Your relatives can't post a bond or sign an affidavit confirming that they undertake your care.
I therefore reiterate, there are no legal routes for asylum seekers. None.
We have safe routes we take in thousands, these are illegal male economic migrants, that want free everything, they don’t want to work!!!
Thank you. U stated the solution but how can u win elections if there’s no immigrants to place the failures it’s all a game and u all being played
@@japfourme381Not from the places the boat people come from. For heaven’s sake wake up and smell the coffee. Plus 70% of people arriving on boats get asylum.
The title of this by Times Radio... makes me laugh. The majority of people in this country I would argue, dont want the illegal immigrants arriving by boats. Why celebrate the fact that we will be steps away from that should Labour get in??
Since most legal routes are no longer available, the refugees have to come in illegally. Immigration is good for the economy, good for society, and great for food. I guess you're just wrong.
Rwanda scheme failed because of Suella Bravermans incompetence not Sunaks.
Suella has done far more than the whole con conservatives group all together. At least she looks out for us Brits and not the immigrants
Sue Ellen, I believe she's pretty much against people deciding who they are and wants them to stick to their birth certificates. Sunak isn't enough of a leader for his incompetence to even matter.
Lol
What an absolute maroon.
{:o:O:}
😂😂😂😂😂
Surprise! Surprise! Vote REFORM UK.
The party for racist old farts.
Would dearly love to if there is z candidate on the ballet form.
Blah blah
Far right channel 'Unsubsribed'
I know what the consequences will be bye-by Richie sunak
I shudder to think what we will do when our universirs have more paying stuidents and the NHS has more care workers.
Let them come hopefully stop some of this white supremacy!
Anti white Racist ☝🏻
@@matt01506 Says the white supremist! 🖕
@@matt01506 Says the suspected white supremist!
@@matt01506 says the real racist
@@matt01506 says the racist
Its mental an a waste of blimin money!!! Typical they prob back handed it to their mates once again....
So it's all a desperate plan yo get himself voted back in - we would be more likely to vote for him if he started the flights today !!!!! And return to sender all the boats - send them straight back !!!!!
Again - just take us out the ECHR ACT 1998 🫤
It’s just a repetitive merry go round of talking the same talk.
To fill the job vacancies? Really??
We’ve just had 2 million immigrants in the 2 years. So you’re telling us that they have all found work and there are still vacancies?
Highly likely most of these immigrants are not working.
It’s all messed up RIP UK
Don’t you want your human rights?