The slat armor did its job. The electrodes from the fuze where cut resulting in that the shaped charge flattened itself against the armor before detonating. If the warhead had worked properly, we'd see a metal jet shooting through the thin metal armor.
It lets the fuse (the pointy thing that activates the warhead) pass but damages the warhead that is wider, that way when the fuse finally hits the armor and activates the warhead, it is either not functional or has been deformed/broken, making it less effective.
Dan Frederiksen Well, slat armor can destroy a projectile no matter the angle, a perfect hit like that would stop it, a non perfect hit can also destroy it, just a hit to the main body but the fuse staying intact will negate a jet from forming. If the contact fuse hits the bar, it can cause a imperfect jet that won’t be able to penetrate armor.
Just to clarify a popular misconception. RPG (meaning the Russian designed anti-tank weapon) does not stand for "rocket propelled grenade". RPG stands for Ruchnoy Protivotankoviy Granatomyot which means handheld anti-tank grenade launcher.
Yes. But RPG still stands for "rocket propelled grenade" when used to describe the broader category of shoulder-mounted shaped charge projectile launchers.
actually is a recoiless gun , there are no rockets used to launch this devices is an explosion inside a tube that shoot the explosive head , thats why they have a shit ton of backblast
Slat armors are effective against RPG, but not against more modern rocket/missile. Also, slat armors have a 45-55% efficacy: If the piezo hits the slat, the shape charge will trigger and punch through 300-400mm RHA. Good vehicle design, base armor, Add-on armor, spall liners, FSS (...) shall be part of part of the protection package.
It wont sadly. RPGs or anti-tank weaponries with twin warheads or tandem shaped charges are designed to defeat the slat armor, era, modular armor, and thickest frontal armor of any modern mbts like abrams and T-90.
_ArmoredGlassCannon [IRD] [NA] No, the point of tandem is to have the primary charge destroy era blocks and slat armor. Mbt uses composite armor. The first charge won’t have anything to counter so it would not have any effect other than weaken it a bit as the first charge is very weak.
No, the slats are spaced apart so the fuze wouldnt hit the bar, if it hit the bar, the fuze would engage thus detonating the charge and allowing a jet to form and penetrate vehicle
Old Soviet antitank grenade/missile do is job regardless of any type of grill bars or even another wall of protection. Just watch the videos on RUclips
Батько наш - Бандера, Україна - мати, Ми за Україну будем воювати! | (2) Ой, у лісі, лісі, під дубом зеленим, Там лежить повстанець тяженько ранений. | (2) Ой, лежить він, лежить, терпить тяжкі муки, Без лівої ноги, без правої руки. | (2) Як прийшла до нього рідна мати його, Плаче і ридає, жалує його. | (2) Ой, сину ж мій, сину, вже навоювався, Без правої ручки, без ніжки зостався. | (2) Мами ж наші, мами, не плачте за нами, Не плачте за нами гіркими сльозами. | (2) Батько наш - Бандера, Україна - мати, Ми за Україну будем воювати! | (2) А ми з москалями та й не в згоді жили, На самого Петра у бій ми вступили. | (2) Москалі тікали, аж лапті губили, А наші за ними постріли били. | (2) Батько наш - Бандера, Україна - мати, Ми за Україну будем воювати! | (2) Ой, як мати сина свого поховала На його могилі слова написала. | (2) На його могилі слова написала: Слава Україні! Всім героям слава!
the armor is meant to damage the warhead of the anti tank munition without detonating it, the damage from the shaped penetrator making it much less effective, there is still a chance the munition can detonate before its damaged.
BUT what if it was MULTIPLE RPG blows? how many rounds would it be able to digest? ALSO what if the following weapons were used on the armor (assume 1 shot each) 1.) A 75mm Sherman gun firing the M72 AP round 2.) A 75mm Kwk L/48 firing Pzgrt 40 or 3.) A 76mm M1 Gun firing HVAPS or the 90mm M3 AP rounds? 4.) A 76mm PaK 42 of the Panther firing APCBC-HE 5.) A Sherman Mayfly 1c firing the QF 17 pdr using APCBC-HE 6.) A Tiger I 88mm firing Pzgrt 39 7.) A PaK 43 firing Pzgrt 39 8.) BS-3 100mm AP rounds 9.) 122mm BR-471 OR if it was subject to: 1.) HE barrages from the Sherman 75mm or 90mm HE rounds? 2.) HE barrages from the 88mm of a Tiger I 3.) HE barrages from the PaK 43 4.) HE rounds from the BS-3 5.) HE rounds from a 122mm gun cannon 6.) HE rounds from the 152mm guns
That's an interesting question, all the rounds you first mentioned are AP, either solid shot or with filler which would penetrate the armor without trouble, but the thing is that the RPG fires a chemical round, that is a HEAT warhead that depends on an explosion inside the warhead to shoot molten metal onto the armor to achieve a penetration, a HEAT no matter the speed or distance (the RPG's rockets actually travel slower than a 9mm bullet) will always achieve the same results unless it is detonated early or the warhead gets damaged before impact (as seen on the video). AP/Solid shots and penetrating rods rely on kinetic energy to achieve a penetration and can only be defeated by armor plating, that is Rolled Homogeneous Armor (solid steel alloy) or Composite Armor. Then onto the HE barrages, these do not penetrate but detonate on impact, if they are strong enough they can deform the metal or cause a concussion that will cause internal damage on the vehicle. A Sherman 75mm HE wouldn't be too lethal whereas a 152mm HE round can cause nasty damage by concussion.
Hmm what about REPEATED BLOWS FROM HE 75mm Sherman shells? So direct repeated barrages? Or at the very least internal damage and crew casualties would be inevitable? Or the armor will eventually give in? Given I thought hmm - if the SLAT armor could endure well a fair amount of firepower ...
(Yes I’m late) The mesh deformed the shaped charge so it doesn’t form the metal jet which would cause penetration. Instead it explodes like a normal frag grenade which is harmless to tanks.
+RJ Lee Because if it work against a live rpg it hurt your feeling ? There is a video in Afghanistan where a MRAP get hit by a RPG with that and it work perfectly fine, again.
Nop. The thing is that people seem to misunderstand what the armor is supposed to do. It works if it manages to deform the shaped charge or prevents optimal jet formation. That does not happen reliably though. And there are tests of this armor that show that even a deformed RPG can still penetrate the armor behind it. Most unconfined vehicles with high internal volume will be fine even without this sort of additional protection. Its used because its cheap and it does have a chance of reducing damage to the vehicle itself. Its not, never was and will never be an actual safeguard from anti-armor weapons.
+RJ Lee well wouldnt you rather have a, lets say, 40% chance of stopping a shaped charge than having no prevention resulting in 100% penetration every time?
@arielvaldman has a higher chance of properly setting off the shaped charge but their is still a possibility of both warheads being damaged before contacting the main armor.
@@odisy64 vague answer for a clear question,if the precursor charge is damaged,then the main charge wont detonate,so again,how would a tandem warhead do better against cage armour?
@arielvaldman because the first charge can still go off although its been damaged and not making a proper penetrating jet, the main charge can go off because the first one did detonate, just not properly.
Er no, the slats job is to deform the shape of the heat warhead and it will malfunction or explode outside the actual armor , lets say the heat round hit at the bar itself and detonated as usual it will still go through all that armor
@@CHEVI789 Are you fucking stupid? Slat armor is made to destroy the warhead thus not allowing it to create a bean to penetrate, if it failed, you'd see an explosion on the other side.
This is a total FAKE ! In the sense that it can't be a normal shaped charged PG 7V or whatever model of the grenade since these slats did nothing but shave away some of the metal casing of the top part of the grenade which couldn't mess up the internal set up of . This one looks more like an ordinary High Explosive grenade then a Cumulative one 🤔
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
The slat armor did its job. The electrodes from the fuze where cut resulting in that the shaped charge flattened itself against the armor before detonating. If the warhead had worked properly, we'd see a metal jet shooting through the thin metal armor.
It lets the fuse (the pointy thing that activates the warhead) pass but damages the warhead that is wider, that way when the fuse finally hits the armor and activates the warhead, it is either not functional or has been deformed/broken, making it less effective.
Normally, yes.
Wiki says it only works about half the time. And I would have less faith in it than that in practice.
interesting
Dan Frederiksen Well, slat armor can destroy a projectile no matter the angle, a perfect hit like that would stop it, a non perfect hit can also destroy it, just a hit to the main body but the fuse staying intact will negate a jet from forming. If the contact fuse hits the bar, it can cause a imperfect jet that won’t be able to penetrate armor.
Just to clarify a popular misconception. RPG (meaning the Russian designed anti-tank weapon) does not stand for "rocket propelled grenade". RPG stands for Ruchnoy Protivotankoviy Granatomyot which means handheld anti-tank grenade launcher.
Yes. But RPG still stands for "rocket propelled grenade" when used to describe the broader category of shoulder-mounted shaped charge projectile launchers.
it not true - dont believe his lies! RPG stands for Russkia Peoples Golupe
It means role playing game actually
it sounds awfully a lot like Rocket Propelled Granade
actually is a recoiless gun , there are no rockets used to launch this devices
is an explosion inside a tube that shoot the explosive head , thats why they have a shit ton of backblast
Should of shown what the armor looked like after.
Yes, and explain the type of armour (thickness, material, ...)
They never do
As seen in the video, there isn’t a jet going through
Dent, but no penatration.
should have
0:12 it worked
clearly mesh deformed the shaped charge so it malfunctioned
That's the point...
Slat armors are effective against RPG, but not against more modern rocket/missile.
Also, slat armors have a 45-55% efficacy: If the piezo hits the slat, the shape charge will trigger and punch through 300-400mm RHA.
Good vehicle design, base armor, Add-on armor, spall liners, FSS (...) shall be part of part of the protection package.
All this time I though some of the military must be poor to be using grandmas old bed frame as a sort of armor.
😂😂😂
They did indeed see t34 ww2.
and what about the twin warhead rpgs?
Than you’re fucked
It wont sadly. RPGs or anti-tank weaponries with twin warheads or tandem shaped charges are designed to defeat the slat armor, era, modular armor, and thickest frontal armor of any modern mbts like abrams and T-90.
_ArmoredGlassCannon [IRD] [NA] No, the point of tandem is to have the primary charge destroy era blocks and slat armor. Mbt uses composite armor. The first charge won’t have anything to counter so it would not have any effect other than weaken it a bit as the first charge is very weak.
Doom Guy yes it will help but it won’t counter composite as the other person said.
Something tells me most types other than heat are pretty scarce.
Shouldn't the slats be tighter together?
No, the slats are spaced apart so the fuze wouldnt hit the bar, if it hit the bar, the fuze would engage thus detonating the charge and allowing a jet to form and penetrate vehicle
Slate mesh armor, no big deal
This that girl who hates her dead mom?
that net is the one who broke down the rpg power
Anderson's Armour: Wood /plastic composite 😮
Old Soviet antitank grenade/missile do is job regardless of any type of grill bars or even another wall of protection. Just watch the videos on RUclips
Батько наш - Бандера, Україна - мати,
Ми за Україну будем воювати! | (2)
Ой, у лісі, лісі, під дубом зеленим,
Там лежить повстанець тяженько ранений. | (2)
Ой, лежить він, лежить, терпить тяжкі муки,
Без лівої ноги, без правої руки. | (2)
Як прийшла до нього рідна мати його,
Плаче і ридає, жалує його. | (2)
Ой, сину ж мій, сину, вже навоювався,
Без правої ручки, без ніжки зостався. | (2)
Мами ж наші, мами, не плачте за нами,
Не плачте за нами гіркими сльозами. | (2)
Батько наш - Бандера, Україна - мати,
Ми за Україну будем воювати! | (2)
А ми з москалями та й не в згоді жили,
На самого Петра у бій ми вступили. | (2)
Москалі тікали, аж лапті губили,
А наші за ними постріли били. | (2)
Батько наш - Бандера, Україна - мати,
Ми за Україну будем воювати! | (2)
Ой, як мати сина свого поховала
На його могилі слова написала. | (2)
На його могилі слова написала:
Слава Україні! Всім героям слава!
the armor is meant to damage the warhead of the anti tank munition without detonating it, the damage from the shaped penetrator making it much less effective, there is still a chance the munition can detonate before its damaged.
@@olexanderulyanchenko310 ⚡⚡🙋🏻♂🙋🏻♂
Who’s McCurdy?
very impressive
BUT what if it was MULTIPLE RPG blows? how many rounds would it be able to digest?
ALSO what if the following weapons were used on the armor (assume 1 shot each)
1.) A 75mm Sherman gun firing the M72 AP round
2.) A 75mm Kwk L/48 firing Pzgrt 40 or
3.) A 76mm M1 Gun firing HVAPS or the 90mm M3 AP rounds?
4.) A 76mm PaK 42 of the Panther firing APCBC-HE
5.) A Sherman Mayfly 1c firing the QF 17 pdr using APCBC-HE
6.) A Tiger I 88mm firing Pzgrt 39
7.) A PaK 43 firing Pzgrt 39
8.) BS-3 100mm AP rounds
9.) 122mm BR-471
OR if it was subject to:
1.) HE barrages from the Sherman 75mm or 90mm HE rounds?
2.) HE barrages from the 88mm of a Tiger I
3.) HE barrages from the PaK 43
4.) HE rounds from the BS-3
5.) HE rounds from a 122mm gun cannon
6.) HE rounds from the 152mm guns
That's an interesting question, all the rounds you first mentioned are AP, either solid shot or with filler which would penetrate the armor without trouble, but the thing is that the RPG fires a chemical round, that is a HEAT warhead that depends on an explosion inside the warhead to shoot molten metal onto the armor to achieve a penetration, a HEAT no matter the speed or distance (the RPG's rockets actually travel slower than a 9mm bullet) will always achieve the same results unless it is detonated early or the warhead gets damaged before impact (as seen on the video).
AP/Solid shots and penetrating rods rely on kinetic energy to achieve a penetration and can only be defeated by armor plating, that is Rolled Homogeneous Armor (solid steel alloy) or Composite Armor.
Then onto the HE barrages, these do not penetrate but detonate on impact, if they are strong enough they can deform the metal or cause a concussion that will cause internal damage on the vehicle. A Sherman 75mm HE wouldn't be too lethal whereas a 152mm HE round can cause nasty damage by concussion.
Hmm what about REPEATED BLOWS FROM HE 75mm Sherman shells? So direct repeated barrages? Or at the very least internal damage and crew casualties would be inevitable? Or the armor will eventually give in?
Given I thought hmm - if the SLAT armor could endure well a fair amount of firepower ...
Who uses dinosaur era tanks anyways?
This is for modern combat.
Foom-zilla ゴジラ honey all the tanks you named would be long destroyed before they even get in range of their guns...
we got a Warthunder player that plays too hard here
What's the point? It still hits the armor plate.
(Yes I’m late) The mesh deformed the shaped charge so it doesn’t form the metal jet which would cause penetration. Instead it explodes like a normal frag grenade which is harmless to tanks.
@@ariq4209 Oh, I see. Cool. Thanks, bro. Keep up the good work. 👍
wow so this is why we installed those cages on our Matvs in 2010 in afghanistan! makes sense
Now how about they actually use a live grenade?
+RJ Lee Because if it work against a live rpg it hurt your feeling ? There is a video in Afghanistan where a MRAP get hit by a RPG with that and it work perfectly fine, again.
Nop. The thing is that people seem to misunderstand what the armor is supposed to do.
It works if it manages to deform the shaped charge or prevents optimal jet formation. That does not happen reliably though. And there are tests of this armor that show that even a deformed RPG can still penetrate the armor behind it.
Most unconfined vehicles with high internal volume will be fine even without this sort of additional protection.
Its used because its cheap and it does have a chance of reducing damage to the vehicle itself. Its not, never was and will never be an actual safeguard from anti-armor weapons.
+RJ Lee well wouldnt you rather have a, lets say, 40% chance of stopping a shaped charge than having no prevention resulting in 100% penetration every time?
so it doesnt work then?
It deformed the charge and it actually detonated a bit earlier than it would have, causing a lot less damage and penetration.
Now try it with a modern tandem warhead as used by, for example, Hamas.
why? most of what they have are single charge warheads.
Can you clarify by which means would a tandem charge do better against this setup?
@arielvaldman has a higher chance of properly setting off the shaped charge but their is still a possibility of both warheads being damaged before contacting the main armor.
@@odisy64 vague answer for a clear question,if the precursor charge is damaged,then the main charge wont detonate,so again,how would a tandem warhead do better against cage armour?
@arielvaldman because the first charge can still go off although its been damaged and not making a proper penetrating jet, the main charge can go off because the first one did detonate, just not properly.
Hartmann Lakes
Very good
Armour worked.
I live in Brazil.
It worked
yamuldu arakdaki demir daha ne olsun 🤣
That seemed to be HE round not HEAT to defeat armour...
Lukas Kaucik its heat but mesh deformed the shaped charge so it malfunctioned
Lukas Kaucik The slat armor destroyed the body of the heat round so the heat round blew up on itself without forming a jet.
It is heat, the at part got screwed up by the cage
@@kristijanmedved6066 it clearly did not...went right trough the mesh...
@@lukaskaucik8616 no. The shell was damaged by the slats and didn't function correctly.
Lopez Amy Garcia Mary Jones Jessica
the real basketball game
Very good weapon.
The armor worked
how pathetic, those slats had to be closer, knew this was going to fail after seeing the distance between the slats.
It didnt.
It didnt fail....the warhead blew up outside and didnt penetrate the main armor. The slate armor worked.
Dave, are you fucking blind?, it went straight through the slats and hit the target then exploded, wtf?.
Er no, the slats job is to deform the shape of the heat warhead and it will malfunction or explode outside the actual armor , lets say the heat round hit at the bar itself and detonated as usual it will still go through all that armor
@@CHEVI789 Are you fucking stupid? Slat armor is made to destroy the warhead thus not allowing it to create a bean to penetrate, if it failed, you'd see an explosion on the other side.
fail
No its not. It didnt penetrate
This is a total FAKE ! In the sense that it can't be a normal shaped charged PG 7V or whatever model of the grenade since these slats did nothing but shave away some of the metal casing of the top part of the grenade which couldn't mess up the internal set up of . This one looks more like an ordinary High Explosive grenade then a Cumulative one 🤔
What's the he variant of the grenade called then?
@@BoraHorzaGobuchul Modified, what else?! Dimwit
lol you cry a lot for not understanding that if a shappd penetrator gets deformed, its no longer a shapped penetrator.