To those who are students and are watching this, Im a practicing fluids engineer for about 4 years now, and I frequently come back to these lectures. What I would have given to have this guy as a professor!
My son was in the hospital for a whole week and that set me behind in this course. We had a quiz the weekend that he got back home and I was freaking out. I watched 3 of your videos and got perfect on the quiz. Thank you!
thanks sir, but id didnt undertsand why the diameter taking 100? 10 cm fistly but during e/D we divided by 100 at 45:35,, are we gonna change ıt milimeter everytime ? and if i get the D ısnt ınner or outer, thats nomınal value, are we take 100 from table or just convert to mm ?
shouldn't the lowermost value of y-axis (friction factor) on Moody diagram read 0.01, instead of 0.02 ? i think it should. because prof. Biddle finds the f as 0.0179 (at 3:33) and marks it at a point higher than 0.02 on y-axis !... it can't be right.
hey dude, i was wondering if u could tell me the math required for this course? like till which mit course or harvard or maybe the topics,it would be super helpful and nice🙃
When calculating the head loss through fittings, is the same "K" value used no matter what the viscosity? Everything I've read, states the "K" values are for based on water. Wouldn't there be bigger losses in a fitting for a more viscous liquid?
K values are actually dependent upon a lot of factors. However, there are so many uncertainties involved in the pipe flow calculations that treating them like a constant is often okay. K values help get an estimate of flow speed, pressure drop, or whatever you are trying to find.
In the energy equation written by Prof. Biddle, are V1 and V2 average velocity? Doesn't friction or shear stress cause the velocity profile to become non-uniform anymore?
Hi, I would like to know does Dr.Biddle have " Dimensional Analysis • Buckingham Theorem • Common Dimensionless Parameters • Modeling and Similitude" and "Compressible Flow • Ideal Gas Relationships • Mach Number and Speed of Sound • One-Dimensional Flow of an Ideal Gas • Normal Shock Waves" lecture video. Thanks again for the great lecture videos.
Update... Dr. Biddle's Fluids II lecture series was recorded and is now being finalized. It hopefully will be available in this playlist by September 2018.
That is all for now. Only about half of the book is covered in this course. We may record the follow-up course from the same instructor at a later time though.
The value of H calculated in the first part has all the minor and major loses involved in that, and that value is wrong to be used in part two. The head developed by the pump must be equal to the the H calculated in part first because it will overcome the gravity, minor and major losses.
The Swamee-Jain equation, Haaland equation, and other approximations can be found on Wikipedia. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darcy_friction_factor_formulae#Approximations_of_the_Colebrook_equation All are designed to calculate the friction factor as easy as possible, but introduce some small error.
+Mohammed Najeeb you've probably found the answer but the formula with the 4 is usually used in chemical engineering.basically they give the same outcome but for the formula with the 4, you have to use fanning friction instead of darcy weisbach,(f from moody chart)
A pipe of 244cm diameter made from new cast iron carries water of kinematic viscosity 1.13*10^6 m^2/s . the head loss due to friction is 46cm per 305m of the pipe when the flow running through the pipe is steady and has a Reynolds number (Re) less than 2000
Hello, where can I find the remaining of the 34 videos?
Thanks.
ruclips.net/p/PLZOZfX_TaWAE7uM59dIBr-rH73WTJCcp_
@@CPPMechEngTutorials Thank you very much. This is saving my grade right now.
@@igwaltz7794 its just 17 videos there
@@CPPMechEngTutorials i need all 34 these link has just 17
@@jolaoshooluwatobi4582 Dude the second playlist has videos 19-34...which are the remaining lectures after watching 1-18 on this current playlist.
To those who are students and are watching this,
Im a practicing fluids engineer for about 4 years now, and I frequently come back to these lectures. What I would have given to have this guy as a professor!
This guy is incredible! He is legitimately about to save my grade on my fluid mechanics final. Much love my dude
mine too, hes a legend
My son was in the hospital for a whole week and that set me behind in this course. We had a quiz the weekend that he got back home and I was freaking out. I watched 3 of your videos and got perfect on the quiz. Thank you!
Don't know how to describe my gratitude, this is true physics lesson.
I'm so relieved that I'm not the only person who removes the plastic lid to sip my coffee.
I wish you were my instructor, your are really a great and amazing teacher,thank you
It would be very helpful,If you add the pdf link of the hand-outs, he talk about in the lectures in the description of the vedio
wow!!! this doctor is really impressed me he is amazing
49:16 how come K = 5.7 when in the book it's given for a Globe, fully open valve K = 10!
49:45 I'm looking at another table in my notes and don't see K=0.64 for a standard elbow
thanks sir, but id didnt undertsand why the diameter taking 100? 10 cm fistly but during e/D we divided by 100 at 45:35,, are we gonna change ıt milimeter everytime ? and if i get the D ısnt ınner or outer, thats nomınal value, are we take 100 from table or just convert to mm ?
e is in millimeter so, just change D to millimeter to cancel the dimension out.
thanks sometimes i couldnt think simply :)
shouldn't the lowermost value of y-axis (friction factor) on Moody diagram read 0.01, instead of 0.02 ? i think it should. because prof. Biddle finds the f as 0.0179 (at 3:33) and marks it at a point higher than 0.02 on y-axis !... it can't be right.
good lecturing style, I like it.
Sire, do you have lectures on Daisy law calculation and that of chezy law?
where are the equations at from 25:20
Thank you for great lectures "Adamsın"
Our pleasure.
professor, is there any way to get your handouts? btw I'm really appreciated of your lecture. thank you!
47:30 wasn't f was supposed to be 0.02?
58:00 can somebody explain this formula?
23:43 damn, I told you guys, he should declare his prophecy, that's a miracle, he just went away, just to drink his coffee
Dr. Biddle does indeed have magical powers.
Well, I continue with the second part of this series. 👍👍
globe valve, fully open says 10 in the textbook (8th ed)
where does 5.7 come from?
@23:42 What are the good news? 😀
Is there a pdf for professor's worksheets or homeworks or examples etc. ?
thanks sir you saved my final
hey dude, i was wondering if u could tell me the math required for this course? like till which mit course or harvard or maybe the topics,it would be super helpful and nice🙃
When calculating the head loss through fittings, is the same "K" value used no matter what the viscosity? Everything I've read, states the "K" values are for based on water. Wouldn't there be bigger losses in a fitting for a more viscous liquid?
K values are actually dependent upon a lot of factors. However, there are so many uncertainties involved in the pipe flow calculations that treating them like a constant is often okay. K values help get an estimate of flow speed, pressure drop, or whatever you are trying to find.
In the energy equation written by Prof. Biddle, are V1 and V2 average velocity?
Doesn't friction or shear stress cause the velocity profile to become non-uniform anymore?
Hi, I would like to know does Dr.Biddle have
" Dimensional Analysis
• Buckingham Theorem
• Common Dimensionless Parameters
• Modeling and Similitude"
and
"Compressible Flow
• Ideal Gas Relationships
• Mach Number and Speed of Sound
• One-Dimensional Flow of an Ideal Gas
• Normal Shock Waves"
lecture video.
Thanks again for the great lecture videos.
We currently do not have videos on dimensional analysis. However, there are plans on adding such videos in the future.
Update... Dr. Biddle's Fluids II lecture series was recorded and is now being finalized. It hopefully will be available in this playlist by September 2018.
It is now available.
ruclips.net/p/PLZOZfX_TaWAE7uM59dIBr-rH73WTJCcp_
Can we get the notes , example questions he tell during lectures?
Can you please provide a link for the first 17 videos? I can only find the first 18 videos.
There are around three chapters in the book which are not covered in those 18 videos.
Is there another playlist or something?
That is all for now. Only about half of the book is covered in this course. We may record the follow-up course from the same instructor at a later time though.
Update: The Fluids II lecture series is now available on our channel.
ruclips.net/p/PLZOZfX_TaWAE7uM59dIBr-rH73WTJCcp_
CPPMechEngTutorials what a timing, just completed the first course. Thanks
Hooray!
Good lecture 😊
thanks for explaining plain ol' V that was tripping me up for some reason
so whats gama for the last part of the example
The value of H calculated in the first part has all the minor and major loses involved in that, and that value is wrong to be used in part two. The head developed by the pump must be equal to the the H calculated in part first because it will overcome the gravity, minor and major losses.
Please, are there videos for theory of machines, vibration and control subjects?
There are some videos related to controls at www.cpp.edu/meonline
Its helpful thanks teacher
hey, do you guys have recorded the thermodynamics video lecture series of dr. biddle,... please put the link below if u have, thank you
Prof. Biddle usually teaches fluid mechanics and heat transfer. We do have a thermodynamics series with Prof. Miller though.
Sir please do you have a solution to this problem
Praise to Allah. Finally finished fluid thank you professor so much.
Can we have the 3 alternative formulas chart that Dr Biddle shared with the class or at least the name of the equations. Thank you very much
Can you provide a timestamp where he mentions this?
@@CPPMechEngTutorials it's in 23:48. The page two from the paper he has in his hand. Thanks a lot.
The Swamee-Jain equation, Haaland equation, and other approximations can be found on Wikipedia.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darcy_friction_factor_formulae#Approximations_of_the_Colebrook_equation
All are designed to calculate the friction factor as easy as possible, but introduce some small error.
Is it possible to get the same charts that are being used in this lecture? Biddle said they're not the ones from the textbook used.
Please provide a time where you see a chart.
@@CPPMechEngTutorials its at 30:29. It would be really helpfull, thank you, amazing lectures btw!
whats the formula to find pump power pls
i found this formula hfs=4fL/d but you allways write hfs= fL/d which one is the corect?
+Mohammed Najeeb Can you provide a time where you see this equation?
+CPPMechEngTutorials i found it in deferente references not here but is it corected or not? the equation need 4 only plz i wate
+Mohammed Najeeb you've probably found the answer but the formula with the 4 is usually used in chemical engineering.basically they give the same outcome but for the formula with the 4, you have to use fanning friction instead of darcy weisbach,(f from moody chart)
+khaira i see thank you..
pls how do u find the gamma
i had that same question
you are the best
Thanks!
Why V1 and V2 taken as zero?Is it because of reservoir concept?
Can you provide a timestamp?
Very nice explanation, he was missing an Arabic translation to understand some words during the explanation 😅
Thank you 🙏🖤
finally i found it was tow frection factor fanning factor multiplied by 4
where we can find the hand out pls
same question
Where can we get lecture handout notes?
thanks
None will be available. Sorry.
@@CPPMechEngTutorials eh.. thanks for the video lecture series which already contain massive knowledge it seems I should start going to library again.
A pipe of 244cm diameter made from new cast iron carries water of kinematic viscosity 1.13*10^6 m^2/s . the head loss due to friction is 46cm per 305m of the pipe when the flow running through the pipe is steady and has a Reynolds number (Re) less than 2000
What about static head z1 @ 45.00
Are you sure you have the correct timestamp? If so, can you explain your question a bit more?
thank sirrr
👍👍
there is a wrong at 45.57 we known diameter 10cm but teacher writed 100 so calculatıon ıs maybe wrong
The epsilon was most likely in mm so he had to put the diameter in terms of mm to nondimensionalize the roughness factor. That is my guess.
I wish i could have that hand out as well..lol
ابوس ربك
rabbak