I suppose it's inevitable that once created chickenosaurus would cleverly escape its confines, somehow manage to reproduce, and when hunting in hungry aggressive packs pose a threat to humans.
My question is: Why is it never talked about the hips of current birds and those that became extinct after the disappearance of non-avian theropod dinosaurs? If birds are descended from non-avian theropod saurischian dinosaurs, why do they have hips like ornithischian dinosaurs? From what I've heard it would be evolutionary convergence. If so, can the gene or genes that made that change be discovered or has it already been lost?
Yeah, they evolved more ornithischian hips from saurischian hips. I'm not sure if it can be perfectly replicated, what that would require is for them to look at the hips like they looked at the hand and tail. There is actually a shot of the hip in this video, but it look a LOT different than sauriscien hips already. Perhaps an earlier stage? It may not be possible, sometimes old genes are completely lost from a genome - just as the teeth for these dino chickens lack the gene that gives them enamel, requiring them to plant in that gene from crocadilians or other related animals.
Deciding when a new species exists is not a subjective thing. A species is a group of organisms which can breed together and produce fertile offspring. By definition then, a new species exists, not when a new physical feature -- like teeth or a tail -- exists, but when individuals in a population can no longer breed together and produce fertile offspring. The question is: "Have added changes in the phenotype (physical appearance) of an organism -- even ones repeated many times in many generations -- ever been demonstrated to produce changes in the genotype (genetic information) of an organism?
A woman and child were actually eaten in JP. It was that little girl (who is both a girl and a child, of course) who got eaten/attacked by the compies in TLW
I know there was one woman who got eaten in Jurassic World, and it was the coolest death in the movie. Progress! Maybe children get eaten in the next one? ...Eh, probably not.
When you realise Cambridge University studies show that Australian Aborigines languages are only 4000 years old , and the Sahara and Antartica had massive amounts of vegetation around 4300 years ago, and you know that carbon 14 , collagen, blood vessels are found in dinosaurs and much more in them, make evolution theory absolutely absurd, then you realise cultures talk about seeing dinosaurs and actually drew pictures of them, the real mystery is why catholic,Anglican, Muslim Universites , natural history museums and Smithsonian are spending billions of dollars teaching such absurdity as fact and it’s well worth realising that it is also impossible that an earthquake could take millions of years to travel across America, it’s time to watch Kurt Wises video “ in-depth explanation of Noahs Flood “ And then when you know that 30 year old rocks from Mt St. Helens got dated up to 2 million years old, and other known 200 year old rocks, got dated up to 1.6 billion years old, it’s time to study the work of Dr Steve Austin on Mt St. Helens. Also worth suffering the work of Dr andrew Snelling on uranium to pollonium decay and pollonium radiohalos, you then might see that what Dominique goerlitz and colonel Howard Vyse found in the Giza pyramid, iron plate and magnetite traces , which matches the book with the best evidence for, which has iron mentioned before the flood, making what previous date given for Iron Age absurd as well. Then you might wonder what Egyptians are doing on the Hoysaleswara temple in India, and why an Egyptian temple in found under the Norris dam in East Tennessee, well worth watching Dr Dan Wallace’s video on evidence for the New Testament, but hurry, Those catholic and Anglican leaders are now praising Islam, who say that Jesus wasn’t crucified!!!!!!! Also well worth watching Michael J Oards flood geology series.
Moas were utterly beautiful creatures. Ostriches are kinda cute, as for Cassowary's Jesus, they don't look like much, but I agree mate they'd seriously fuck your shit up. I Imagine a few unarmed aboriginals got wasted by them by back in the day. I shudder to think what they'd do to a child. Shame they are so fucking ugly with those ball sacks hanging off their chin.
So they conspire, but they're honourable. Nice to know, or it would be if I was a woman or a child. But I am starting to get sceptical that this guy is actually doing this project. I think he's just using it as a teaching tool. If he was really doing it, I would expect more pictures of work in progress.
I did some googling. Apparently he got funding by George Lucas back when Lucas was doing Jurassic Park, but he since ran out of funding after doing some genuine research on the development of tails. Other laboratories have made other related results, and I think Horner is implying he wants to replicate them. All in all, it's fine research, apparently,, but his main funder for the project just wanted it to be a marketing gimmick.
not really, he tweaked existing controller genes to reactivate quiet genes. I am talking about taking dino genes not already in the chicken into a chicken. this might result in some kind of dino that never existed before, genes without their controllers or in context of other controllers could act ("express") differently than they did originally.
@@infowolf1 No... In some very rare cases, soft tissues can be encased in stone and avoid being rotted away. This is small things such as cells and heme from blood, but even when tinkering with these incredibly rare finds there are no traces of DNA, not even shadows of it. There are no non-avian dinosaur fossils that are younger than 65 million years. No dinosaur that isn't a bird has died as recently as a few thousand years ago.
some dinosaurs r reptiles some r birds some r fish. the great white used to be a megladon. it just shrank a lot over the years. Crocodiles also used to be a lot bigger than they r now. Creatures get biger or smaller depending on the oxygene in the atmosphere and gravity changes. High oxygene lvls mean animals can get bigger if the gravity is more they also get bigger to counter it.
Dr. Jack is one of my favorite presenters. If more high school teachers were like him, we'd have more scientists.
I enjoy Jack Horner's style of talking about dinosaurs.
I really hope something comes of this; I'd like to see him get the Nobel Prize.
"This Bulldog thing, we don't know what that is, it doesn't look like anything" (Dr. Jack Horner, 2013)
If we genetically engineered something like that, they'd throw us in jail. Thought it's worht being completed
I would like to see the look on a fox's face when it gets into a hen house full of Dino-chickens.
made my day
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Good one M8
I suppose it's inevitable that once created chickenosaurus would cleverly escape its confines, somehow manage to reproduce, and when hunting in hungry aggressive packs pose a threat to humans.
This is a great idea for a film LOL
He's like a gentle Gould.
This will change the fried dino chicken industry forever!
“Dino legs buckets with ranch”, oh the future is looking bright!!
KFC should fund Jack Horner's research of dinochickens, so they could mass breed them and sell to us the deep fried version
Get me a Veloci-wrap-tor.
Why would it taste different? They could just say they were selling dino-chickens and not actually.
Everything tastes like dinosaur
@@dan240393 you sir, have earned my like 👍
Atavisms can be stimulated with electrostatic fields on fish eggs or plant seeds. I'm sure it works with bird eggs too.
this is 8 years old. Is there something more recent about the progress?
I CANT WAIT TO HAVE A PET CHICKENASUARUS! I KNEW A GUY WITH A PET ROOSTER THAT WAS FRIENDLY
My question is: Why is it never talked about the hips of current birds and those that became extinct after the disappearance of non-avian theropod dinosaurs?
If birds are descended from non-avian theropod saurischian dinosaurs, why do they have hips like ornithischian dinosaurs?
From what I've heard it would be evolutionary convergence. If so, can the gene or genes that made that change be discovered or has it already been lost?
Yeah, they evolved more ornithischian hips from saurischian hips. I'm not sure if it can be perfectly replicated, what that would require is for them to look at the hips like they looked at the hand and tail. There is actually a shot of the hip in this video, but it look a LOT different than sauriscien hips already. Perhaps an earlier stage? It may not be possible, sometimes old genes are completely lost from a genome - just as the teeth for these dino chickens lack the gene that gives them enamel, requiring them to plant in that gene from crocadilians or other related animals.
Deciding when a new species exists is not a subjective thing. A species is a group of organisms which can breed together and produce fertile offspring. By definition then, a new species exists, not when a new physical feature -- like teeth or a tail -- exists, but when individuals in a population can no longer breed together and produce fertile offspring. The question is: "Have added changes in the phenotype (physical appearance) of an organism -- even ones repeated many times in many generations -- ever been demonstrated to produce changes in the genotype (genetic information) of an organism?
A woman and child were actually eaten in JP. It was that little girl (who is both a girl and a child, of course) who got eaten/attacked by the compies in TLW
Jack save the day
I want one :)
I know there was one woman who got eaten in Jurassic World, and it was the coolest death in the movie. Progress! Maybe children get eaten in the next one? ...Eh, probably not.
Wait thats not the villain from the new puss and boots
When you realise Cambridge University studies show that Australian Aborigines languages are only 4000 years old , and the Sahara and Antartica had massive amounts of vegetation around 4300 years ago, and you know that carbon 14 , collagen, blood vessels are found in dinosaurs and much more in them, make evolution theory absolutely absurd, then you realise cultures talk about seeing dinosaurs and actually drew pictures of them, the real mystery is why catholic,Anglican, Muslim Universites , natural history museums and Smithsonian are spending billions of dollars teaching such absurdity as fact and it’s well worth realising that it is also impossible that an earthquake could take millions of years to travel across America, it’s time to watch Kurt Wises video “ in-depth explanation of Noahs Flood “
And then when you know that 30 year old rocks from Mt St. Helens got dated up to 2 million years old, and other known 200 year old rocks, got dated up to 1.6 billion years old, it’s time to study the work of Dr Steve Austin on Mt St. Helens.
Also worth suffering the work of Dr andrew Snelling on uranium to pollonium decay and pollonium radiohalos, you then might see that what Dominique goerlitz and colonel Howard Vyse found in the Giza pyramid, iron plate and magnetite traces , which matches the book with the best evidence for, which has iron mentioned before the flood, making what previous date given for Iron Age absurd as well. Then you might wonder what Egyptians are doing on the Hoysaleswara temple in India, and why an Egyptian temple in found under the Norris dam in East Tennessee, well worth watching Dr Dan Wallace’s video on evidence for the New Testament, but hurry,
Those catholic and Anglican leaders are now praising Islam, who say that Jesus wasn’t crucified!!!!!!!
Also well worth watching Michael J Oards flood geology series.
just wait. im gonna make it soon as i graduated from my collage
Albriando Yunarta Are you studying at a picture collection?
Albriando Yunarta You graduated yet?
Collage? That graduation seems a long way off....
@@Exiledk Maybe he's an artist? When he's finished making his collage, he's going to make one about chickasauruses.
Been 7 years. Still waiting.
Dolfins?
moa, ostrich cassowary left over dinosaurs
infowolf1 nah, the Cassowary is a bird imitation of Muhammad Ali. Don’t fuck with it.
Moas were utterly beautiful creatures. Ostriches are kinda cute, as for Cassowary's Jesus, they don't look like much, but I agree mate they'd seriously fuck your shit up. I Imagine a few unarmed aboriginals got wasted by them by back in the day. I shudder to think what they'd do to a child. Shame they are so fucking ugly with those ball sacks hanging off their chin.
Pigeons, chickens, sparrows, humming birds. Any avian fits the bill (badum tss).
But the terror bird
OK then why don't they use CRISPER???
So they conspire, but they're honourable. Nice to know, or it would be if I was a woman or a child.
But I am starting to get sceptical that this guy is actually doing this project. I think he's just using it as a teaching tool. If he was really doing it, I would expect more pictures of work in progress.
I did some googling. Apparently he got funding by George Lucas back when Lucas was doing Jurassic Park, but he since ran out of funding after doing some genuine research on the development of tails.
Other laboratories have made other related results, and I think Horner is implying he wants to replicate them.
All in all, it's fine research, apparently,, but his main funder for the project just wanted it to be a marketing gimmick.
all feed it cows
I’d be happy with a dinochicken
See, this is how we messed up the first time. Then they got humongous and starting eating us. Jurassic Park is based on true events.
i want a pet t-rex
what about taking bits of dino DNA that you can't clone into a full dinosaur, and putting it in a chicken?
not really, he tweaked existing controller genes to reactivate quiet genes. I am talking about taking dino genes not already in the chicken into a chicken. this might result in some kind of dino that never existed before, genes without their controllers or in context of other controllers could act ("express") differently than they did originally.
@@infowolf1 we don't really have dino DNA, we never found it. we found soft tissue like he said but no actual DNA, it can't last that long
soft tissue can't last that long either, the dinos it came from were only dead a few hundred or a few thousand years.
@@infowolf1 No... In some very rare cases, soft tissues can be encased in stone and avoid being rotted away. This is small things such as cells and heme from blood, but even when tinkering with these incredibly rare finds there are no traces of DNA, not even shadows of it. There are no non-avian dinosaur fossils that are younger than 65 million years. No dinosaur that isn't a bird has died as recently as a few thousand years ago.
so dinosaurs are flightless birds.
No, birds are just flying dinosaurs. (Well, except for the flightless birds. They're just dinosaurs.)
Correct!
some dinosaurs r reptiles some r birds some r fish.
the great white used to be a megladon. it just shrank a lot over the years. Crocodiles also used to be a lot bigger than they r now.
Creatures get biger or smaller depending on the oxygene in the atmosphere and gravity changes.
High oxygene lvls mean animals can get bigger if the gravity is more they also get bigger to counter it.
367
Although now we know marine reptiles eat women. Specifically the Mosasaur.
Ever wonder how THe boy from BOY MEETS WORLD (the one with hots for topanga) became Chris Ryan PHD. wtf dude
The presentation hasn't even started yet but i guarantee you that Scott Bakula is rolling over in his grave. Trust that.